Premium Essay

Descartes Argument for External Worlds

In: Philosophy and Psychology

Submitted By rtmoore
Words 1132
Pages 5
In Rene Descartes Meditation on First Philosophy, Descartes has cast a net of doubt on everything that he knows using three main arguments. In order to know something to be certain and true, he must get rid of the skeptical hypotheses to find truths that one simply cannot doubt. In order to fully overcome these doubts that he casts in Meditation I, he must analyze and show that he could be certain of the existence of the material world, despite the dreaming and demon arguments, which can be seen in the Sixth Meditation. He methodically gets to this by first considering the possible causes of material objects followed by the nature of these material objects and which attributes they possess.
In Meditation VI Descartes considers the relationship between the cause of an idea and the idea itself in terms of the “formal” or ‘eminent’ reality in the cause and the ‘objective’ reality in the idea. Formal reality is the kind of reality something has by virtue of the kind of thing it is, while the objective reality is possessed only by representations, that is, by things that stand for other things. In essence a thing has objective reality, for Descartes, if it is a representation of something. For example, a bird is objectively real, and to say that the bird, as the cause of my idea, has formal reality is to say that it has the represented properties that my idea has in actual fact. In other words, the bird actually has wings, whereas the idea only has represented wings. We can distinguish between the idea, considered as the carrier of the representational content, and also the idea considered as the content itself – much in the same way that when we consider a painting we can think of it as canvas and paint, and also as a painting of something (say, a bird). Descartes’ job is to show that the formal reality is the true source of the objective reality of the idea; to do

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Descartes: Evil Demon

...Karthik Keni Phil 21 Greg Antill Part A: 1. The Evil Demon Argument In Descartes’ First Meditation, he completely shatters the foundations of his previous beliefs and then uses the evil demon argument as a platform in which he can explain the source of his beliefs. Descartes proposes the evil demon argument because he wants to instill doubt not only in himself, but also in his audience that God may not be the only “Supreme Being”. He believes God to be a good being that wouldn’t deceive us and lead our thoughts astray. The evil demon argument has the purpose of casting doubt on his belief that God is the only being who has the capability of implementing thoughts into his mind, creating doubt of the existence of an external world, and aiding his pursuit of a strong and certain foundation for all his knowledge and beliefs. In this argument, Descartes doesn’t refute the reality of a God, however I believe he presents the argument as if they both exist and that if he is being deceived it could not be from God, the good being, but the evil genius providing him with false sensory material. The primary claim of this skeptical argument is to doubt the reality of an external world that has the possibility of being created by an evil demon. Deceit could be defined in such a way that our minds are being controlled by an evil demon and that our senses of an external world are mistaken. Depicting the evil demon argument of Descartes in a science fiction way like “The Matrix,” made me really...

Words: 1511 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

What Is Descartes Argument Of Skepticism

...Skepticism about the Internal World To begin the essay, Byrne describes Descartes’ argument of skepticism in the external world. Descartes believes things are not as they seem to be, and that one cannot prove what they think they know due to the lack of evidence. He believes that if you see yourself as you are in one moment, you could really be vividly dreaming, and be ignorant to it. He elaborates in his First Meditation by saying, “that there are never any sure signs by means of which being awake can be distinguished from being asleep” (Byrne 283). Therefore he concludes he does not know if he is actually awake and sitting by a fire, and this applies to everyone. As a result I do not know that I am sitting in Langsam typing a paper for Philosophy or if I am vividly dreaming of doing so....

Words: 971 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Do We Really Know Anything?

...TOPIC 1: Do you really know anything? With reference to Descartes’ first meditation justify your answer in full and respond to possible objections. A belief is any opinion or any view whether you are committed to the view or not. Thus, if you know something, you are entitled to believe in it. The subjective nature of knowledge partly is based on the idea that beliefs are things that individuals have and those beliefs are either justified or not justified (Pardi, 2011). However, Descartes notices that over the course of his life, he has from time to time accepted false beliefs and the falsity of these beliefs have influenced other beliefs. Thus, Descartes aim in his first meditation is to find out if what we know is truly correct (Blackburn, 1999:15). Once we have figured out what beliefs are beyond any possible doubt, it is suggested that we can use reason to deduce the rest of what is knowable (Pardi, 2011). There are three conditions when one can say they know something is true (Pardi, 2011). Firstly, you believe in something, secondly, it is in fact true and lastly you are justified in believing a statement is true. Of course it is possible that there are no complete unshakeable truths, it is also possible that we might discover that our prejudices cannot be detached or that the beliefs we think are our grounds for all our other beliefs are not really ultimate at all. For this reason, it is why rationalist say that knowledge comes from within, the only beliefs we can...

Words: 1630 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

World

...PHI-101-013 Rationalism VS Empiricism They say : Hume says knowledge comes from the way one’s mind perceived the physical world. 1.Hume claimed that people perceive the world in two ways – through impressions which are one’s senses and through ideas which are one’s thoughts. 2.Hume claimed that there was no such thing as an innate idea, which is an idea present in the human mind that was not created through some sort of experience. 3.Hume asserted that nothing remains the same, but that one’s mind perceives what is similar as being the same if change occurs gradually rather than abruptly. We say/I say: Descartes says knowledge lies in the mind not the senses. 1.Descartes claims that the way we perceive things comes from thinking. 2.Descartes claimed that we often sense things that don’t physically exist in the external world. 3.Descartes claimed if any component of something was in the very least questionable, then any conclusion drawn from it would be at the most questionable. 4.Descartes reasoned that our senses often misinterpret the physical world. 5.Descartes claimed while it’s possible to not sense things, it’s impossible not to think. Conclusion: Descartes wrote, “I find here that thought is an attribute that belongs to me; it alone cannot be separated from me”. While it’s possible to not sense things, it’s impossible not to think. Descartes claims that he is just “a thing which thinks”. His proof is that he can question his own existence. While he admits...

Words: 776 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Evil Genius Argument

...The writer Rene Descartes wrote during the rise of modern-day, since his main idea is to establish a safe foundation. He didn’t believe scientists had a pursuit of knowledge, and so his challenge was to offer an unsteady point, which was an “Archimedean Fulcrum”, he would say. To obtain this idea he introduces “The Method of Doubt,” that allows him to automatically doubt structures of his knowledge. “The Method of Doubt” is to allow Descartes to think about one thing that cannot be called into datable questions. This idea becomes the “first item of knowledge.” Doubting something that can be believed to be truthful is not a good practice to challenge the thought pattern. Descartes had an unsure feeling that gave us a great amount of knowledge....

Words: 754 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

John Locke's An Essay Concerning Human Understanding

...I am going to argue the following: The world around us as we know it can only be known to us through sense-data: what we gather through our senses that have been fed by our experiences. “Sense data,” argues John Locke, “ are the alleged mind-dependent objects that we are directly aware of in perception, and that have exactly the properties they appear to have” (Huemer, 2004) For as one person may hold the view of a celestial being's guiding and shaping all of events driven by an immutable ideal, another may view this terrestrial experience of ours as an accident driven by a series of unpredictable events that can only be roughly calculated by what feeble and temporary instruments we have to measure, the tools of math and science. Regardless...

Words: 2374 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

For What We May Hope According to Descartes

...“Mediation of First Philosophy’’, Rene Descartes attempts to separate the truth from false and the imaginary from reality while giving new hope to his readers. He actually tries to withdraw from his previous conclusions claiming that he could have used senses rather than thinking and therefore this round he withdraws totally from senses through a process of methodological doubt. He creates a sense of doubt in other scholars work by disputing their line of thinking with a distinguished line of logic. He sheds off any criticism directed at him and urges his readers to argue along his line of logic to get his concept and reason. HOW OR WHY THE COGITO EGO SUM IS HOPEFUL. Descartes concludes that he cannot doubt his existence. He argues that doing so would mean that even the idea of doubting would not exist and as far as it exists, then its source is him, his mind. However, the existence of the body puts him in a situation of doubt. He thinks that the idea of a mind implanted in a body is a deception and forms a basis of argument and cross psychological analysis. He goes ahead to state that this would be demons work of deceiving him or it can be that God was praying tricks on him, something he really doesn’t conquer with. God being perfect, He would not do that. ‘I think, therefore I am’ in the Discourse on method is hopeful because it brings out the picture of knowledge, that the mind can know itself better than it can do to anything else. Descartes is certain that he can only support...

Words: 912 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Descartes on the Distinction Between Body and Mind

...Name Tutor Course Date Descartes Premise for Distinguishing Body and Mind In the Meditations on First Philosophy, Descartes discusses the nature of the body and mind. By drawing from three lines of thought, Descartes launches a powerful premise that the body is something distinct from the mind. He conceptualizes his argument by using the uncertainty of knowledge argument, appealing to God’s omnipotence, and describing the indivisibility of the body and mind. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to discuss and analyze Descartes’s premise for distinguishing the body and mind. In the first Meditation, Descartes begins by discussing a topic that seems far removed from the subject, yet instrumental to his argument. He questions the certainty of reality or truth of worldly opinions. In meditations 1.5, he notes that his opinions about the world are based on senses and argues that he cannot be certain that his senses deceive him. He argues that he cannot be sure that what he thinks of as his perceptions of the world are not dreams (Cress 36). Because there is no mechanism for distinguishing sleep from wake, Descartes says that he is also uncertain about the existence of the body. In addition, he argues that an evil demon may be deceiving him about the existence of the sky, air, colors, sounds, and bodies yet such things are illusions of dreams (Cress 41). By reflecting on the scenario of the evil demon and dreaming, Descartes doubts whether external things such as the body exists...

Words: 1181 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Cartesian Circle

...Rene Descartes, like many philosophers immersed himself in many aspects of life including both art and science. One major topic he addressed in great deal regarding philosophy was whether or not we could have absolute knowledge, including that of the external world. He is considered by many people to be a foundational rationalist. He used both the aspects of foundationalism and reason to prove it was possible to possess true knowledge. After finishing his meditations he felt he had indeed accomplished this task. However, many philosophers have found problems with his reasoning. One philosopher in particular, Antoine Arnauld, felt one of his most important proofs employed the use of circular reasoning to prove his argument. This has become known as “The Cartesian Circle”, and it has given rise to great debates over the years. This paper will set out to prove Descartes does in fact commit the error of circularity. Using foundationalism as a starting point Descartes starts with the most basic intuition anyone can have, “I think, therefore I exist”. This is a self-evident truth which is true because he clearly and distinctly perceives it, and it is impossible to doubt. Throughout the rest of his meditations he uses a series of intuitions to reason the truth of the external world. Once he has nearly proved its existence he was forced to prove God exists and God was not a deceiver in order to rid the skeptical argument of an evil demon constantly deceiving us. Eventually...

Words: 1098 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Descartes Mind and Body

...Descartes’ Mind Body Dualism Rene Descartes’ main purpose is to attempt to prove that the mind that is the soul or the thinking thing is distinct and is separate from the body. This thinking thing was the core of himself, which doubts, believes, reasons, feels and thinks. Descartes considers the body to be an extended unthinking thing; therefore it is possible that one may exist without the other. This view is known as mind-body dualism. He believes that what he is thinking in his mind is what God created and instilled in him. Descartes outlines many arguments to support and prove his claims of his discoveries. He states that because he can think, his mind exists. This is known as the Cogito, which is the first existential principal of all of Descartes’ work where modern philosophy begins. Descartes also explains that it is possible that all knowledge of external objects, including his body could be false because of the deceiving actions of an evil genius. The evil genius could make him contemplate his existence of his nature as a thinking thing. Descartes further explains in his arguments, even physical objects, such as the body, are better and more distinctly known through the mind than through the body. Descartes shows this through his example of The Wax Argument, where solid wax transitions into liquid state. With all of this in mind, Descartes theories suggest the mind and body can exist separately but it can be argued, the mind needs the body in order to think and reason...

Words: 1480 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Paper

... Locke on the origin of Ideas AO1 Position and its implications: The mind is a tabula rasa or "blank slate" at birth, empty of all ideas and knowledge; it is gradually filled through experience AO1 Detail, Illustration: An Essay Concerning Human Understanding II.1 Locke's definition of "idea" = "the object of thinking" He gives examples: "such as are those expressed by the words whiteness, hardness, sweetness, thinking, motion, man, elephant, army, drunkenness, and others" We might say concepts rather than ideas, the basic mental building blocks of propositions or declarative sentences Ideas are acquired through two processes, sensation or reflection; each is a type of perception, the first of external objects, the second an inward perception of mental processes. Sensation The senses "convey" perceptions into the mind, or rather "they convey into the mind what produces there those perceptions". These are the ideas of "sensible qualities" e.g. colour, heat etc. Reflection Later on, once we have acquired some ideas through sensation, we are able to gain ideas from reflection; this is "the perception of the operations of our own mind within us." e.g....

Words: 8854 - Pages: 36

Premium Essay

Who Is Descartes Proof Of God

...d) Descartes pointed out the objector’s mistake by simply reestablishing the connection principle in his reply. Hobbes immediately disclaims that we cannot have any idea of God, however that is precisely what he does to even begin his objection. One has to consider the idea to be true before disproving it, and this is overseen by the objector but corrected by the originator. The simple statement to conclude his reply, “...this is completely self-evident,” is an excellent way that Descartes credits his proof of God; Hobbes must realize that he did, in fact, consider the idea of God. Descartes wants to convince his audience that there is an all omniscient being, without using total evidence to prove that there is this being; he wants the idea of God to be accepted without excessive evidence. He probes his audience to use their senses and their ideas to develop a belief in God , rather than just present “hard” evidence using the sensory argument. This is to provoke people, mainly skeptics, to consider this idea for themselves and truly work to understand and believe in it....

Words: 424 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Got on

...The Importance of God Descartes then, very quickly and cursorily, faces up to a major corner he seems to have painted himself into. How is he to have any reliable knowledge of the external world, when all his senses are deceptive and the only truth is his own inner process of thinking? How can his knowledge escape total self-consciousness, a thoroughgoing solipsism? The argument (or rather the summary sketch of the later argument) concerning God is the key stage which enables him to take this step. It is not uncommon for first-time readers of the Discourse to find this section rather problematic and to offer the comment that Descartes is here simply placating religious authorities rather than being sincere in his affirmations of belief. Whatever the nature of Descartes' religious beliefs (and there seems little evidence that his statements about them are not sincere), it's important to note that the paragraphs about God are an essential part of the philosophical argument, a necessary logical foundation for the method he is proposing. Without them, the certainty he is seeking would not be available. The argument for the existence of God is, in part, a traditional one, as Descartes acknowledges. Since he has ideas of perfection and all the flawless qualities of God, he questions where these might have arisen. As a limited and imperfect human being, he does not have those qualities himself. And they cannot have come from sense experience of nature or from outside...

Words: 590 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Philosophy Descartes

...Descartes' Methodic Doubt René Descartes (1596-1650) is an example of a rationalist. According to Descartes, before we can describe the nature of reality (as is done in metaphysics) or say what it means for something to be or exist (which is the focus of ontology), we must first consider what we mean when we say we know what reality, being, or existence is. He suggests that it is pointless to claim that something is real or exists unless we first know how such a claim could be known as a justified true belief. But to say that our beliefs are justified, we have to be able to base them ultimately on a belief that is itself indubitable. Such a belief could then provide a firm foundation on which all subsequent beliefs are grounded and could thus be known as true. This way of thinking about knowledge is called foundationalism. In his Meditations on First Philosophy (1641), Descartes indicates how we are able to guarantee our beliefs about reality by limiting what we believe to what is indubitable or is based on what is indubitable. That involves him in a series of six "meditations" (of which we will focus on only the first two) about the proper method of philosophical reflection and the conclusions that can be drawn from using that method. Throughout these Meditations Descartes insists that (1) we should claim to know only that for which we have justification, (2) we cannot appeal to anything outside of our ideas for such justification, and (3) we judge our ideas using a method...

Words: 1949 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

“I Know That There Is a Mind-Independent, External World.”

...The statement “I know there is a mind-independent, external world” basically suggests 1) that the world and other material objects around us – e.g. tables, animals, other people – can exist independent of our perception and 2) that we can actually obtain knowledge about their existence. In this paper, I will criticize this claim by showing that, even if there exist an external world regardless of our perceptions, we can never “know” if they are actually part of our reality by just thinking about it. As a basis for discussion, I will classify the concept of understanding into three levels: believing, knowing, and having certainty about something. To believe is to accept an idea in our mind that could be innate, adventitious and self-produced. To know is to make judgement on what we believe based on experience, while to have certainty is to know without a doubt that an idea or knowledge is a definite truth. At the end of his Meditations on First Philosophy, Descartes comes up with a conclusion that an external world does indeed exist regardless of his perception. He begins his meditations by doubting everything he sense and experience, supposing that everything he knows about the external world is just a dream. In this state of absolute doubt, he withdraws the mind from the sense and tries to perceive the nature of reality through a purely intellectual perspective. The first thing Descartes realizes he can be certain of is his own existence for he would have to exist to be able...

Words: 1354 - Pages: 6