Free Essay

Discipline of Innovation .Peter Drucker

In: Business and Management

Submitted By larsy
Words 4702
Pages 19
The Discipline of Innovation by Peter F Drucker .

Reprint r0208f

August 2002

HBR Case Study The Sputtering R&D Machine
Martha Craumer


Voices Inspiring Innovation Creativity Under the Gun
Teresa M. Amabile, Constance N. Hadley, and Steven J. Kramer



The Failure -Tolerant Leader
Richard Farson and Ralph Keyes

r0208d r0208e

Breaking Out of the Innovation Box
John D. Wolpert

Best of HBR The Discipline of Innovation
Peter F Drucker .

r0208f r0208g r0208h r0208j

Research That Reinvents the Corporation
John Seely Brown

Tough-Minded Ways to Get Innovative
Andrall E. Pearson

Organizing for Innovation: When Is Virtual Virtuous?
Henry W. Chesbrough and David J. Teece

Creativity Is Not Enough
Theodore Levitt


In Closing Stumbling into Brilliance
Danny Hillis




The Discipline

of Innovation by Peter F Drucker .
How much of innovation is inspiration, and how much is hard work? If it’s mainly the former, then management’s role is limited: Hire the right people, and get out of their way. If it’s largely the latter, management must play a more vigorous role: Establish the right roles and processes, set clear goals and relevant measures, and review progress at every step. Peter Drucker, with the masterly subtlety that is his trademark, comes down somewhere in the middle. Yes, he writes in this article, innovation is real work, and it can and should be managed like any other corporate function. But that doesn’t mean it’s the same as other business activities. Indeed, innovation is the work of knowing rather than doing. Drucker argues that most innovative business ideas come from methodically analyzing seven areas of opportunity, some of which lie within particular companies or industries and some of which lie in broader social or demographic trends. Astute managers will ensure that their organizations maintain a clear focus on all seven. But analysis will take you only so far. Once you’ve identified an attractive opportunity, you still need a leap of imagination to arrive at the right response – call it “functional inspiration.”

In business, innovation rarely springs from a flash of inspiration. It arises from a cold-eyed analysis of seven kinds of opportunities.

Despite much discussion these days of the “entrepreneurial personality,” few of the entrepreneurs with whom I have worked during the past 30 years had such personalities. But I have known many people – salespeople, surgeons, journalists, scholars, even musicians – who did have them without being the least bit entrepreneurial. What all the successful entrepreneurs I have met have in common is not a certain kind of personality but a commitment to the systematic practice of innovation.

Innovation is the specific function of entrepreneurship, whether in an existing business, a public service institution, or a new venture started by a lone individual in the family kitchen. It is the means by which the entrepreneur either creates new wealth-producing resources or endows existing resources with enhanced potential for creating wealth. Today, much confusion exists about the proper definition of entrepreneurship. Some observers use the term to refer to all small businesses; others, to all new businesses. In practice, however, a 5

Copyright © 2002 by Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation. All rights reserved.


great many well-established businesses engage in highly successful entrepreneurship. The term, then, refers not to an enterprise’s size or age but to a certain kind of activity. At the heart of that activity is innovation: the effort to create purposeful, focused change in an enterprise’s economic or social potential.

Sources of Innovation
There are, of course, innovations that spring from a flash of genius. Most innovations, however, especially the successful ones, result from a conscious, purposeful search for innovation opportunities, which are found only in a few situations. Four such areas of opportunity exist within a company or industry: unexpected occurrences, incongruities, process needs, and industry and market changes. Three additional sources of opportunity exist outside a company in its social and intellectual environment: demographic changes, changes in perception, and new knowledge. True, these sources overlap, different as they may be in the nature of their risk, difficulty, and complexity, and the potential for innovation may well lie in more than one area at a time. But together, they account for the great majority of all innovation opportunities.


Unexpected Occurrences

Consider, first, the easiest and simplest source of innovation opportunity: the unexpected. In the early 1930s, IBM developed the first modern accounting machine, which was designed for banks. But banks in 1933 did not buy new equipment. What saved the company – according to a story that Thomas Watson, Sr., the company’s founder and long-term CEO, often told – was its exploitation of an unexpected success: The New York Public Library wanted to buy a machine. Unlike the banks, libraries in those early New Deal days had money, and Watson sold more than a hundred of his otherwise unsalable machines to libraries. 6

Fifteen years later, when everyone believed that computers were designed for advanced scientific work, business unexpectedly showed an interest in a machine that could do payroll. Univac, which had the most advanced machine, spurned business applications. But IBM immediately realized it faced a possible unexpected success, redesigned what was basically Univac’s machine for such mundane applications as payroll, and within five years became a leader in the computer industry, a position it has maintained to this day. The unexpected failure may be an equally important source of innovation opportunities. Everyone knows about the Ford Edsel as the biggest new-car failure in automotive history. What very few people seem to know, however, is that the Edsel’s failure was the foundation for much of the company’s later success. Ford planned the Edsel, the most carefully designed car to that point in American automotive history, to give the company a full product line with which to compete with General Motors. When it bombed, despite all the planning, market research, and design that had gone into it, Ford realized that something was happening in the automobile market that ran counter to the basic assumptions on which GM and everyone else had been designing and marketing cars. No longer was the market segmented primarily by income groups; the new principle of segmentation was what we now call “lifestyles.” Ford’s response was the Mustang, a car that gave the company a distinct personality and reestablished it as an industry leader. Unexpected successes and failures are such productive sources of innovation opportunities because most businesses dismiss them, disregard them, and even resent them. The German scientist who around 1905 synthesized novocaine, the first nonaddictive narcotic, had intended it to be used in major surgical procedures like amputation. Surgeons, however, preferred total anesthesia for such procedures; they still do. Instead, novocaine found a ready appeal among

dentists. Its inventor spent the remaining years of his life traveling from dental school to dental school making speeches that forbade dentists from “misusing” his noble invention in applications for which he had not intended it. This is a caricature, to be sure, but it illustrates the attitude managers often take to the unexpected: “It should not have happened.” Corporate reporting systems further ingrain this reaction, for they draw attention away from unanticipated possibilities. The typical monthly or quarterly report has on its first page a list of problems – that is, the areas where results fall short of expectations. Such information is needed, of course, to help prevent deterioration of performance. But it also suppresses the recognition of new opportunities. The first acknowledgment of a possible opportunity usually applies to an area in which a company does better than budgeted. Thus genuinely entrepreneurial businesses have two “first pages” – a problem page and an opportunity page – and managers spend equal time on both.



Alcon Laboratories was one of the success stories of the 1960s because Bill Conner, the company’s cofounder, exploited an incongruity in medical technology. The cataract operation is the world’s third or fourth most common surgical procedure. During the past 300 years, doctors systematized it to the point that the only “old-fashioned” step left was the cutting of a ligament. Eye surgeons had learned to cut the ligaPeter F. Drucker is the Marie Rankin Clarke Professor of Social Science and Management at Claremont Graduate University’s Peter F. Drucker Graduate School of Management in Claremont, California. He has written more than two dozen articles for HBR. This article was originally adapted from his book Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles (Harper & Row, 1985). harvard business review

T h e D i s c i p l i n e o f I n n o vat i o n

ment with complete success, but it was so different a procedure from the rest of the operation, and so incompatible with it, that they often dreaded it. It was incongruous. Doctors had known for 50 years about an enzyme that could dissolve the ligament without cutting. All Conner did was to add a preservative to this enzyme that gave it a few months’ shelf life. Eye surgeons immediately accepted the new compound, and Alcon found itself with a worldwide monopoly. Fifteen years later, Nestlé bought the company for a fancy price. Such an incongruity within the logic or rhythm of a process is only one possibility out of which innovation opportunities may arise. Another source is incongruity between economic realities. For instance, whenever an industry has a steadily growing market but falling profit margins – as, say, in the steel industries of developed countries between 1950 and 1970 – an incongruity exists. The innovative response: minimills. An incongruity between expectations and results can also open up possibilities for innovation. For 50 years after the turn of the century, shipbuilders and shipping companies worked hard both to make ships faster and to lower their fuel consumption. Even so, the more successful they were in boosting speed and trimming their fuel needs, the worse the economics of ocean freighters became. By 1950 or so, the ocean freighter was dying, if not already dead. All that was wrong, however, was an incongruity between the industry’s assumptions and its realities. The real costs did not come from doing work (that is, being at sea) but from not doing work (that is, sitting idle in port). Once managers understood where costs truly lay, the innovations were obvious: the roll-on and roll-off ship and the container ship. These solutions, which involved old technology, simply applied to the ocean freighter what railroads and truckers had been using for 30 years. A shift in viewpoint, not in techTHE INNOVATIVE ENTERPRISE

nology, totally changed the economics of ocean shipping and turned it into one of the major growth industries of the last 20 to 30 years.


Process Needs

Anyone who has ever driven in Japan knows that the country has no modern highway system. Its roads still follow the paths laid down for – or by – oxcarts in the tenth century. What makes the system work for automobiles and trucks is an adaptation of the reflector used on American highways since the early 1930s. The reflector lets each car see which other cars are approaching from any one of a half-dozen directions. This minor invention, which enables traffic to move smoothly and with a minimum of accidents, exploited a process need. What we now call the media had its origin in two innovations developed around 1890 in response to process needs. One was Ottmar Mergenthaler’s Linotype, which made it possible to produce newspapers quickly and in large volume. The other was a social innovation, modern advertising, invented by the first true newspaper publishers, Adolph Ochs of the New York Times, Joseph Pulitzer of the New York World, and William Randolph Hearst. Advertising made it possible for them to distribute news practically free of charge, with the profit coming from marketing.


Industry and Market Changes

Managers may believe that industry structures are ordained by the good Lord, but these structures can–and often do – change overnight. Such change creates tremendous opportunity for innovation. One of American business’s great success stories in recent decades is the brokerage firm of Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, recently acquired by the Equitable Life Assurance Society. DL&J was founded in 1960 by three young men, all graduates of the Harvard Business

School, who realized that the structure of the financial industry was changing as institutional investors became dominant. These young men had practically no capital and no connections. Still, within a few years, their firm had become a leader in the move to negotiated commissions and one of Wall Street’s stellar performers. It was the first to be incorporated and go public. In a similar fashion, changes in industry structure have created massive innovation opportunities for American health care providers. During the past ten or 15 years, independent surgical and psychiatric clinics, emergency centers, and HMOs have opened throughout the country. Comparable opportunities in telecommunications followed industry upheavals – in transmission (with the emergence of MCI and Sprint in long-distance service) and in equipment (with the emergence of such companies as Rolm in the manufacturing of private branch exchanges). When an industry grows quickly – the critical figure seems to be in the neighborhood of 40% growth in ten years or less – its structure changes. Established companies, concentrating on defending what they already have, tend not to counterattack when a newcomer challenges them. Indeed, when market or industry structures change, traditional industry leaders again and again neglect the fastest growing market segments. New opportunities rarely fit the way the industry has always approached the market, defined it, or organized to serve it. Innovators therefore have a good chance of being left alone for a long time.


Demographic Changes

Of the outside sources of innovation opportunities, demographics are the most reliable.Demographic events have known lead times; for instance, every person who will be in the American labor force by the year 2000 has already been born. Yet because policy makers often neglect demographics, those who watch them and exploit them can reap great rewards. 7

august 2002


The Japanese are ahead in robotics because they paid attention to demographics. Everyone in the developed countries around 1970 or so knew that there was both a baby bust and an education explosion going on; about half or more of the young people were staying in school beyond high school. Consequently, the number of people available for traditional blue-collar work in manufacturing was bound to decrease and become inadequate by 1990. Everyone knew this, but only the Japanese acted on it, and they now have a ten-year lead in robotics. Much the same is true of Club Mediterranee’s success in the travel and resort business. By 1970, thoughtful observers could have seen the emergence of large numbers of affluent and educated young adults in Europe and the United States. Not comfortable with the kind of vacations their workingclass parents had enjoyed – the summer weeks at Brighton or Atlantic City– these young people were ideal customers for a new and exotic version of the “hangout” of their teen years. Managers have known for a long time that demographics matter, but they have always believed that population statistics change slowly. In this century, however, they don’t. Indeed, the innovation opportunities made possible by changes in the numbers of people – and in their age distribution, education, occupations, and geographic location – are among the most rewarding and least risky of entrepreneurial pursuits.


Changes in Perception

mortality rates for the newborn, survival rates for the very old, the incidence of cancers (other than lung cancer), cancer cure rates, or other factors. Even so, collective hypochondria grips the nation. Never before has there been so much concern with or fear about health. Suddenly, everything seems to cause cancer or degenerative heart disease or premature loss of memory. The glass is clearly half empty. Rather than rejoicing in great improvements in health, Americans seem to be emphasizing how far away they still are from immortality. This view of things has created many opportunities for innovations: markets for new health care magazines, for exercise classes and jogging equipment, and for all kinds of health foods. The fastest growing new U.S. business in 1983 was a company that makes indoor exercise equipment. A change in perception does not alter facts. It changes their meaning, though– and very quickly. It took less than two years for the computer to change from being perceived as a threat and as something only big businesses would use to something one buys for doing income tax. Economics do not necessarily dictate such a change; in fact, they may be irrelevant. What determines whether people see a glass as half full or half empty is mood rather than fact, and a change in mood often defies quantification. But it is not exotic. It is concrete. It can be defined. It can be tested. And it can be exploited for innovation opportunity.

Knowledge-based innovations differ from all others in the time they take, in their casualty rates, and in their predictability, as well as in the challenges they pose to entrepreneurs. Like most superstars, they can be temperamental,

Knowledge-based innovations can be temperamental,

capricious, and hard to direct. capricious, and hard to direct. They have, for instance, the longest lead time of all innovations. There is a protracted span between the emergence of new knowledge and its distillation into usable technology. Then there is another long period before this new technology appears in the marketplace in products, processes, or services. Overall, the lead time involved is something like 50 years, a figure that has not shortened appreciably throughout history. To become effective, innovation of this sort usually demands not one kind of knowledge but many. Consider one of the most potent knowledge-based innovations: modern banking. The theory of the entrepreneurial bank – that is, of the purposeful use of capital to generate economic development – was formulated by the Comte de Saint-Simon during the era of Napoleon. Despite SaintSimon’s extraordinary prominence, it was not until 30 years after his death in 1825 that two of his disciples, the brothers Jacob and Isaac Pereire, established the first entrepreneurial bank, the Credit Mobilier, and ushered in what we now call finance capitalism. The Pereires, however, did not know modern commercial banking, which developed at about the same time across the channel in England. The Credit Mobilier failed ignominiously. A few years later, two young men – one an American, J.P. Morgan, and one a German, Georg Siemens–put together the French harvard business review

“The glass is half full” and “The glass is half empty” are descriptions of the same phenomenon but have vastly different meanings. Changing a manager’s perception of a glass from half full to half empty opens up big innovation opportunities. All factual evidence indicates, for instance, that in the last 20 years, Americans’ health has improved with unprecedented speed – whether measured by 8


New Knowledge

Among history-making innovations, those that are based on new knowledge – whether scientific, technical, or social – rank high. They are the superstars of entrepreneurship; they get the publicity and the money. They are what people usually mean when they talk of innovation, although not all innovations based on knowledge are important.

T h e D i s c i p l i n e o f I n n o vat i o n

theory of entrepreneurial banking and the English theory of commercial banking to create the first successful modern banks: J.P. Morgan & Company in New York, and the Deutsche Bank in Berlin. Ten years later, a young Japanese, Shibusawa Eiichi, adapted Siemens’s concept to his country and thereby laid the foundation of Japan’s modern economy. This is how knowledge-based innovation always works. The computer, to cite another example, required no fewer than six separate strands of knowledge: • binary arithmetic; • Charles Babbage’s conception of a calculating machine, in the first half of the nineteenth century; • the punch card, invented by Herman Hollerith for the U.S. census of 1890; • the audion tube, an electronic switch invented in 1906; • symbolic logic, which was developed between 1910 and 1913 by Bertrand Russell and Alfred North Whitehead; • and concepts of programming and feedback that came out of abortive

Innovation requires knowledge, ingenuity, and, above all else, focus. attempts during World War I to develop effective antiaircraft guns. Although all the necessary knowledge was available by 1918, the first operational digital computer did not appear until 1946. Long lead times and the need for convergence among different kinds of knowledge explain the peculiar rhythm of knowledge-based innovation, its attractions, and its dangers. During a long gestation period, there is a lot of talk and little action. Then, when all the elements suddenly converge, there is tremendous excitement and activity and an enormous amount of speculation. Between 1880 and 1890, for example, almost

1,000 electric-apparatus companies were founded in developed countries. Then, as always, there was a crash and a shakeout. By 1914, only 25 were still alive. In the early 1920s, 300 to 500 automobile companies existed in the United States; by 1960, only four of them remained. It may be difficult, but knowledgebased innovation can be managed. Success requires careful analysis of the various kinds of knowledge needed to make an innovation possible. Both J.P. Morgan and Georg Siemens did this when they established their banking ventures. The Wright brothers did this when they developed the first operational airplane. Careful analysis of the needs – and, above all, the capabilities – of the intended user is also essential. It may seem paradoxical, but knowledge-based innovation is more market dependent than any other kind of innovation. De Havilland, a British company, designed and built the first passenger jet, but it did not analyze what the market needed and therefore did not identify two key factors. One was configuration – that is, the right size with the right payload for the routes on which a jet would give an airline the greatest advantage. The other was equally mundane: How could the airlines finance the purchase of such an expensive plane? Because de Havilland failed to do an adequate user analysis, two American companies, Boeing and Douglas, took over the commercial jet-aircraft industry.

Principles of Innovation
Purposeful, systematic innovation begins with the analysis of the sources of new opportunities. Depending on the context, sources will have different importance at different times. Demographics, for instance, may be of little concern to innovators of fundamental industrial processes like steelmaking, although the Linotype machine became successful primarily because there were not enough skilled typesetters available to satisfy a mass market. By the same token, new

knowledge may be of little relevance to someone innovating a social instrument to satisfy a need that changing demographics or tax laws have created. But whatever the situation, innovators must analyze all opportunity sources. Because innovation is both conceptual and perceptual, would-be innovators must also go out and look, ask, and listen. Successful innovators use both the right and left sides of their brains. They work out analytically what the innovation has to be to satisfy an opportunity. Then they go out and look at potential users to study their expectations, their values, and their needs. To be effective, an innovation has to be simple, and it has to be focused. It should do only one thing; otherwise it confuses people. Indeed, the greatest praise an innovation can receive is for people to say, “This is obvious! Why didn’t I think of it? It’s so simple!” Even the innovation that creates new users and new markets should be directed toward a specific, clear, and carefully designed application. Effective innovations start small. They are not grandiose. It may be to enable a moving vehicle to draw electric power while it runs along rails, the innovation that made possible the electric streetcar. Or it may be the elementary idea of putting the same number of matches into a matchbox (it used to be 50). This simple notion made possible the automatic filling of matchboxes and gave the Swedes a world monopoly on matches for half a century. By contrast, grandiose ideas for things that will “revolutionize an industry” are unlikely to work. In fact, no one can foretell whether a given innovation will end up a big business or a modest achievement. But even if the results are modest, the successful innovation aims from the beginning to become the standard setter, to determine the direction of a new technology or a new industry, to create the business that is–and remains–ahead of the pack. If an innovation does not aim at leadership from the beginning, it is unlikely to be innovative enough. 9

august 2002


Above all, innovation is work rather than genius. It requires knowledge. It often requires ingenuity. And it requires focus. There are clearly people who are more talented innovators than others, but their talents lie in well-defined areas. Indeed, innovators rarely work in more than one area. For all his systematic innovative accomplishments, Thomas Edison worked only in the electrical field. An innovator in financial areas, Citibank for example, is not likely to embark on innovations in health care. In innovation, as in any other endeavor, there is talent, there is ingenuity, and there is knowledge. But when all is said and done, what innovation requires

is hard, focused, purposeful work. If diligence, persistence, and commitment are lacking, talent, ingenuity, and knowledge are of no avail. There is, of course, far more to entrepreneurship than systematic innovation–distinct entrepreneurial strategies, for example, and the principles of entrepreneurial management, which are needed equally in the established enterprise, the public service organization, and the new venture. But the very foundation of entrepreneurship is the practice of systematic innovation. Reprint r0208f
To place an order, call 1-800-988-0886.


harvard business review


T h e D i s c i p l i n e o f I n n o vat i o n

To learn more about the ideas in “The Discipline of Innovation,” explore the related articles listed at the right. You may access these materials on the Harvard Business School Publishing Web site,, or by calling 800-988-0886 (in the United States and Canada) or 617-783-7500.

A RT I C L E S “Value Innovation: The Strategic Logic of High Growth”
W. Chan Kim and Renée Mauborgne Harvard Business Review, January–February 1997 Product No. 97108 Kim and Mauborgne help managers recognize the opportunities revealed by what Drucker describes as a purposeful search of the environment. Companies achieve sustained high growth, the authors maintain, by pursuing value innovation – shaping conditions in an industry and pursuing quantum leaps in value to customers. Virgin Atlantic, for example, challenged industry conventions by eliminating first-class service and channeling the cost savings into innovations for business-class passengers.

“Breaking Compromises, Breakaway Growth”
George Stalk, Jr., David K. Pecaut, and Benjamin Burnett Harvard Business Review, September–October 1996 Product No. 96507 How and where should companies search for growth? Look for opportunities to break industry compromises, these authors suggest. Compromises occur when an industry imposes its own operating practices or constraints on customers. For example, you can trade off luxury (Ritz-Carlton) for economy (Best Western), but the hotel industry forces you to compromise by not permitting checkin before 4 pm. The quest for innovation opportunities calls for wisdom, curiosity, and perseverance in order to overcome these compromises.

“Developing Products on Internet Time”
Marco Iansiti and Alan MacCormack Harvard Business Review, September–October 1997 Product No. 97505 This article offers a good example of a disciplined search for innovation opportunities in the marketplace. The Internet has created an extremely fast environment for product development. The customer needs that a product is designed to satisfy, and the technologies required to satisfy those needs, can change radically – even as the product is under development. Some companies have responded with a flexible product-development process that lets designers define and shape products up to the last possible moment before market release.


august 2002


Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Reading Note - Sources of Innovation

...------------------------------------------------- READING NOTES: The Discipline of Innovation In this article, Peter F. Drucker provides us a complete framework of the “Innovation”. Systematic innovation is both work and inspiration: it is at the heart of entrepreneurship. According to him, there are three requirements that must be met in order to succeed in innovation: KNOWLEDGE (study potential customers’ needs and expectations), INGENUITY (think about something simple and useful. “Faster, Better, Cheaper” summarize it well) and FOCUS (start with a small idea and make it growth to arrive to an effective innovation). Innovation is also a change in the behavior of people in general or a change in process (how people work or act). The main question is how to innovate. Peter F. Drucker writes that companies have to look for OPPORTUNITIES. He identifies seven ways to innovate, called “the seven sources of innovation”. He divides theses sources in 2 groups: the first four sources lie within the company and the last three depends on the environment of the company (external factors). Unexpected occurrences Successes or failures Incongruities Differences between what it is and what people wants Process needs New product/service is an answer to a need Industry/market changes Offer possibilities to launch a new product/service Demographic changes Statistics about population move quickly Changes in perception Meaning and mood change from a......

Words: 464 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Peter Drucker Essay

...The Drucker Assignment Kenny Astrianti In order for a business to grow, or even to stay alive, it will need to be innovative. Especially in this era of globalization, where competition between companies is getting more extreme and technology is vastly changing. Most people will agree that it is important, for business and individual, to stay innovative. Chapter 20 “Principles Of Innovations” enlightens me the most for several reasons. Firstly, although the chapter was first published in 1985, Drucker’s concept on how to innovate can still be applied today. Secondly, the concept introduced in this chapter will be incredibly beneficial for me to build my career, and to be a better individual, later on. And thirdly, the chapter topic “The Dos” really helps me to acknowledge the things that have to be done to be a performer in innovation. Coming from Indonesia that still struggles with poverty and unemployment, I fully realized the need to be innovative, however, I always questions the on how to innovate and this chapter really improved my knowledge to identify the source of innovations and what to do with it. 27-years after the chapter was published, Drucker principles of innovation can still be applied on today’s business environment. Drucker’s explanation on the sources of innovation gave me a different point of view on how to innovate. Prior to reading this chapter, I thought some people, like Steve Jobs, are born with the innovation DNA because I have not understand on......

Words: 1578 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay


...A brief discussion of the relationship between entrepreneurship, innovation and economic development as well as the role of sustainability in the relationship Introduction: The origin and development on theory As early as the 17th century, the French term "entreprendre "appeared in economics, which evolved into "entrepreneur" as commonly used (Dees,1998). The concept of entrepreneur keeps on developing and varies with the development of socio-economics. Richard Cantillon published his in 1775 “Essay on the Nature of Trade in General" (Murphy,1986). Since then, entrepreneurship was given a definition in the perspective of behavior, including decision-making, sound judgment, supervision of production, innovation, and resource reallocation (Herron, 1993). The new definition of the "entrepreneur" credited by French economists was put by Jean Baptiste in the 19th century "the entrepreneur shifts economic resources out of an area of lower and into an area of higher productivity and greater yield". In this time, entrepreneurship was given the meaning of "creating values"(Dees, 1998). In 1911, “entrepreneur as innovator” was put forward by Schumpeter. In his theory, entrepreneurship nearly the same as innovation is thought to be a critical factor in the promotion of economic development. This theory was unceasingly completed by Schumpeter. Through the process of “disruptive innovation” (Schumpeter, 1942), entrepreneurs create economic opportunities and obtain economic benefits by......

Words: 2375 - Pages: 10

Free Essay


...Organization Peter F. Drucker Jim Collins, Philip Kotler, James Kouzes, Judith Rodin, V. Kasturi Rangan, and Frances Hesselbein 5 “Nobody, not even Socrates, has ever asked better questions than Peter Drucker. All the personality, all the wisdom is here to make your work dramatically more effective. There’s nothing better. It’s like having Peter at your side.” —Bob Buford, author, Halftime and Finishing Well, and founding chairman, Peter F. Drucker Foundation for Nonprofit Management “Peter Drucker’s penetrating and profound insights are more relevant and needed today than when he originally produced them. This helpful revision of his classic Self-Assessment Tool offers managers and leaders in every sector—nonprofit, business, and government—a useful guide to figuring out what’s needed, why it matters, and how to make it work. At a time when the need for more effective management and more ethical leadership are the moral equivalent of global warming, Drucker’s common sense and courage should be modeled by everyone who cares about doing things right and doing the right thing.” —Ira A. Jackson, dean, Peter F. Drucker and Masatoshi Ito Graduate School of Management, and board member, The Drucker Institute “Peter Drucker’s Five Most Important Questions continue to be the indispensable questions that an organization must ask itself, regardless of size or sector, if it is determined to be an organization of the future. When these questions are asked, the journey begins. And......

Words: 20187 - Pages: 81

Premium Essay


...Copyright © 2013 by William A. Cohen. All rights reserved. Except as permitted under the United States Copyright Act of 1976, no part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the publisher. ISBN: 978-0-07-177863-3 MHID: 0-07-177863-2 The material in this eBook also appears in the print version of this title: ISBN: 978-0-07177862-6, MHID: 0-07-177862-4. All trademarks are trademarks of their respective owners. Rather than put a trademark symbol after every occurrence of a trademarked name, we use names in an editorial fashion only, and to the benefit of the trademark owner, with no intention of infringement of the trademark. Where such designations appear in this book, they have been printed with initial caps. McGraw-Hill eBooks are available at special quantity discounts to use as premiums and sales promotions, or for use in corporate training programs. To contact a representative please e-mail us at TERMS OF USE This is a copyrighted work and The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (“McGraw-Hill”) and its licensors reserve all rights in and to the work. Use of this work is subject to these terms. Except as permitted under the Copyright Act of 1976 and the right to store and retrieve one copy of the work, you may not decompile, disassemble, reverse engineer, reproduce, modify, create derivative works based upon, transmit, distribute,...

Words: 87486 - Pages: 350

Premium Essay

Assignment Entrepreneurship

...------------------------------------------------- Myth 5: Entrepreneurs Must Fit the "Profile" Entrepreneurs and Entrepreneurship: An Introduction It is not easy to give a particular answer to the question: Why do people want to start and run independent businesses? Different answers may come from different people. Some people may start a business just because they love independence and hate to tolerate bossing in the jobs. Some may not have the capability and qualification to do a job and as job is not available to them, they go for independent businesses in order to survive. Some may have some special skills and love challenges to run an independent business. Several motivational factors like need for affiliation, need for power and need for achievement (McClelland, 1961) are also responsible for going for an independent business. Murthy, et al (1986) found that entrepreneurs are motivated to start a business because of the factors like ambitious factors, compelling factors and facilitating factors. Whatever may be the reason, it can be said that in most of the times of the history of human civilization, there were entrepreneurs who did independent businesses and this trend of history still continues. For the last few decades in all over the world, entrepreneurs are regarded as value adding people to the society. Holt (1992) says, “The term entrepreneur may be properly applied to those who incubate new ideas, start enterprises based on those ideas, and provide added......

Words: 2496 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Balance Scorecard

...The Balanced Scorecard: Historical Development and Context, As Developed by Robert Kaplan & David Norton Karl R. Knapp Anderson University – Anderson IN ABSTRACT This paper discusses the general theory of the Balanced Scorecard and traces its historical origins. The Balanced Scorecard is based on three main areas: Measurement, Human Relations, and Customer Value Disciplines. The basis in measurement draws on Management by Objectives. The human relations school of management and open-book management theories are influential. The customer value discipline links the scorecard to the strategy of the firm. The Balanced Scorecard The Balanced Scorecard is a theory and management approach first proposed in the Harvard Business Review by Robert S. Kaplan & David P. Norton (1995). A subsequent book, The Balanced Scorecard, was published following this article (1996). The most recent refinement of this theory and management approach appears in Kaplan & Norton’s book, The Strategy-Focused Organization (2001). This paper attempts to present a high-level overview of this management theory, along with a description of its historical foundation and development. As defined by Kaplan and Norton (1996), “The Balanced Scorecard translates an organization’s mission and strategy into a comprehensive set of performance measures that provides the framework for a strategic measurement and management system”. This strategic management system measures organizational performance......

Words: 3416 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay


... A Class with Drucker The Lost Lessons of the World’s Greatest Management Teacher BY WILLIAM A. COHEN, PhD A M E R I C A N NEW YORK I M A N A G E M E N T I A S S O C I A T I O N I AT L A N TA I I B R U S SE L S I CHICAGO I MEXICO CITY I SAN FRANCISCO D. C. S H A N G H A I T O K Y O T O R O N T O W A S H I N G T O N, Special discounts on bulk quantities of AMACOM books are available to corporations, professional associations, and other organizations. For details, contact Special Sales Department, AMACOM, a division of American Management Association, 1601 Broadway, New York, NY 10019. Tel: 212-903-8316. Fax: 212903-8083. E-mail: Website: To view all AMACOM titles go to: This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional service. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional person should be sought. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Cohen, William A., 1937– A class with Drucker : the lost lessons of the world’s greatest management teacher by William A. Cohen. p. cm. Includes index. ISBN 978-0-8144-0919-0 1. Management. 2. Executives—Training of. 3. Drucker, Peter F (Peter Ferdinand), .......

Words: 103006 - Pages: 413

Premium Essay

Entrepreneurial Leadership

...using tools and resources available through the Small Business Administration (SBA) and the website SCORE. We will explore and compile useful information that can be obtained from the SBA that entrepreneurs and new business owners can use to gain an advantage on start up. I will describe my personal principles of leadership and explain why I believe in them. Entrepreneurial Leadership Discuss the common elements described in the theories/philosophies of Case, Kouzes, and Drucker including how their principles/strategies relate to the new definition of entrepreneurial leadership. Entrepreneurial leadership is a complex style of leading. Individuals who practice this style are generally; driven, risk taker, aggressive and can recognize when change will give the advantage. Peter Drucker (1985) discusses several strategies of entrepreneurs, but “Fustest With the Mostest” is one that looks to the future. Entrepreneurs are looking to the future of creating a new market or industry with their innovation. James Kouzes (2008) highlights his five practices of exemplary leadership. One of the five practices, “Inspire a Shared Vision” is leaders envision the future and create an ideal image of what the organization can become. Steve Case (2009)...

Words: 1096 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay


...1 LESSON- 1 ENTREPRENEUR AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP Dr. Jyotsna Sethi STRUCTURE 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Objectives 1.2 Entrepreneurship as a Career Option 1.3 Concepts and Definitions 1.3.1 Entrepreneur 1.3.2 Entrepreneurship 1.3.3 Enterprise 1.3.4 Difference between Entrepreneur and Entrepreneurship 1.4 Role of Entrepreneurship in Economic Development 1.4.1 Entrepreneurship and Economic Development 1.4.2Entrepreneurship and Education 1.5 Functions of an Entrepreneur 1.6 Innovation 1.7 Risk and Uncertainty Bearing 1.8 Organization 1.9 Functions Performed by an Imitator Entrepreneur 1.10Entrepreneur vs. Manager Relationship 1.11 Summary 1.12 Glossary 1.13 Self-Assessment Questions 1.14 Further Readings 1.0 INTRODUCTION Do you know that there are millions of unemployed youth in the country and by the time you graduate, this number would have increased substantially? Do you want to be part of that group which keeps knocking from pillar to post, checking with employment exchanges, relatives, friends, and neighbours and still not able to get a job to their liking and then settle for a second or third rate job? You can also choose to be like Mr. Patel of Nirma who was a chemist’s assistance and has a Rs. 2500 crore company today. Did you know that the original Mr. Bata was a cobbler? And now has stores in more than 30 countries all over the world. Or...

Words: 4399 - Pages: 18

Premium Essay

Entrepreneurial Leadership

...head: Entrepreneurial Leadership Entrepreneurial Leadership Angela Williams Dr. Mensah-Dartey The Business Enterprise April 24, 2011 1. Create a hybrid theory/philosophy which combines the common elements found in the thinking of Case, Kouzes, and Drucker. In your philosophy, be sure to include the new definition of entrepreneurial leadership presented in Understanding Leadership in today’s Dynamic Markets. The common elements found in the thinking of Case (2010), Kouzes (2008), and Drucker (1985) strategies all relate to Entrepreneurial Leadership and have similar qualities. Entrepreneurial Leadership crates visionary scenarios that are used to assemble and mobilize a supporting cast of participants who become committed by the vision to the discovery and exploitation of strategic value creation. The three men also share commonalities such as being risk takers, innovators, investing in people, and being persistent. For instance, Steve Case believes that success requires people, passion, and perseverance (the 3 P’s) and with all together, almost anything is possible. He also believes that entrepreneurship is important in terms of the underlying economic future of our country and that innovation and taking risks in entrepreneurship can get our struggling country back on track. Kouzes could relate to Case’s first “P”, which relates to people. Both Kouzes and Case stresses the importance of people and or his/her feelings. Case stresses the importance of......

Words: 1915 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

"Inside Drucker's Brain" Leadership Analysis

...“Inside Drucker’s Brain” There are no second thoughts when it comes to Peter Drucker being credited, as “the leading founder of the field of management.” He was the first to describe management as more so a “practice, or discipline” as oppose to a science much like Frederick Taylor had assessed. Drucker was a man all about, “getting mangers to ask the right questions. To see beyond what they thought they knew, to look past yesterday so that they might get a glimpse of tomorrow.” He strongly believed in a life and management style that thrived on moving forward without looking back. Abandoning the ineffective or old to make room for the “highly promising and opportunistic new.” He was a brilliant man who to his grave claimed, he knew nothing about management from the “inside” since he had never upheld a management position. Also that he was immersed into the management world “totally by accident” and by “falling into it.” Nonetheless author Jeffrey A. Krames in his written biography titled “Inside Drucker’s Brain,” depicts the man who wrote the “handbook on management.” Not just through his achievements and contributions to the business world, but also through his efforts as a young man paving his way on his own terms, despite criticism or contrary beliefs. In this biography one takes away a sense of who Drucker was personally, professionally and intellectually. Krames includes Drucker’s most valuable principles, and strategies on how to manage a business or......

Words: 1488 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay


...organizations to not only have the best product or service but also to diversify the dynamics of their organization through increased innovation and competitiveness. To be successful in this new age of business, business leaders must emerge ready to lead organizations that face these challenges and uncertainty in multiple dynamic markets (McGrath and MacMillan, 2000). These new types of business leaders are coming to be known as “entrepreneurial leaders.” These leaders are expected to be familiar with the common elements of different theories and philosophies as they relate to the new definition of entrepreneurial leadership along with being able to compare the dimensions of leadership styles within certain organizations. As entrepreneurs, they are privy to a wealth of knowledge, tools and resources that can be obtained from the Small Business Administration (SBA) and the website SCORE. Entrepreneurs are able to use this information to gain an advantage at the start-up of their new business. Hybrid Theory/Philosophy When defining entrepreneurial leadership, it is most widely viewed as a complex style of leading that helps develop and sustain elements of the organizational culture (Bergstrom , 2004). Individuals who practice this style are generally driven, aggressive risk takers and able to recognize when change will give the advantage. Peter Drucker (1985) discusses several strategies of entrepreneurs that aim for leadership and/or dominance of a new or existing market,......

Words: 1856 - Pages: 8

Free Essay


...Senge's learning organization theory- THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK peter senge and the learning organization Peter Senge’s vision of a learning organization as a group of people who are continually enhancing their capabilities to create what they want to create has been deeply influential. We discuss the five disciplines he sees as central to learning organizations and some issues and questions concerning the theory and practice of learning organizations.  contents: introduction · peter senge · the learning organization · systems thinking – the cornerstone of the learning organization · the core disciplines · leading the learning organization · issues and problems · conclusion · further reading and references · links Peter M. Senge (1947- ) was named a ‘Strategist of the Century’ by the Journal of Business Strategy, one of 24 men and women who have ‘had the greatest impact on the way we conduct business today’ (September/October 1999). While he has studied how firms and organizations develop adaptive capabilities for many years at MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), it was Peter Senge’s 1990 book The Fifth Discipline that brought him firmly into the limelight and popularized the concept of the ‘learning organization'. Since its publication, more than a million copies have been sold and in 1997, Harvard Business Review identified it as one of the seminal management books of the past 75 years. On this page we explore Peter Senge’s vision of the learning organization. We will......

Words: 8891 - Pages: 36

Premium Essay

Management Defn, to achieve the overall objectives of your organization. It is very difficult to give a precise definition of the term 'management'. Different scholars from different disciplines view and interpret management from their own angles. The economists consider management as a resource like land, labour, capital and organisation. The bureaucrats look upon it as a system of authority to achieve business goals. The sociologists consider managers as a part of the class elite in the society. Mary Parker Follett Management is also defined as "to get things done through others." She defined management as "the art of getting things done through people." This is a fine definition if there are "others" to help. You are more in the position of being "in charge", "handling" the task at hand, and "directing" yourself in the process. You "managed" to accomplish the task not "through others". So the definition of management in this context is that you got things done all by yourself, using your skills, knowledge and effort. Other definitions are "administration" and "the process of managing." This appears to fit more the previous way of managing people which is more administrative than strategic. Management guru Peter Drucker (1909-2005) stated that the basic task of a management is marketing and innovation....

Words: 1009 - Pages: 5