Free Essay

Do You Agree with the View That, in the Years 1511-27, English Successes in Foreign Policy Outweighed the Failures?

In: Historical Events

Submitted By eviedarnell
Words 710
Pages 3
Do you agree with the view that, in the years 1511-27, English successes in foreign policy outweighed the failures?

I agree with the view that English successes in foreign policy outweighed the failures in the years 1511-27 to a certain extent. England managed to successfully pursue a policy of peace making in the years 1514-21 and wolsey was flexible in his diplomacy. However, it could also be argued that Henry’s chief aim, the invasion of France, was unpopular with people at the time and that Henry’s foreign policy was too costly given how little of long term value it brought to England. His allies also often let him down and put their own aims before those of England. In this essay I will be looking at three sources and weighing up the two sides of the argument.

A point in support of this view is that that England managed to successfully pursue a policy of peace making in the years 1514-21. This is shown in source 4, where MD Palmer tells us that Wolsey successfully brought about peace between England and France in 1514 and that he engineered the universal peace of London in 1518. He also planned the Field of the Cloth of Gold of 1520 and negotiated peace between the Empire and France at Calais in 1521. Wolsey’s peaceful approach also benefitted England in that it reduced costs at a time when the country could not afford another war, and successfully made England a major ‘player’ in Europe, which was a desire of Henry’s.

Another point in support of the view that the successes in foreign policy outweighed the failures is that Wolsey was sly and flexible in his diplomacy. We can see this is source 4 which shows us how Wolsey used the pursuit of peace as a weapon to deceive the French. This argument is also supported in Source 6, where Alastair Armstrong gives Wolsey credit for aligning England with the strongest power in Europe from 1521, in spite of criticising other aspects of English foreign policy.

Source 5 is against the view that successes in foreign policy outweighed the failures, as William Warham says that it was ‘widely spoken’ that invading France would be too expensive and that even if England was successful it would take too much time and money to keep France'. This suggests that an invasion of France was unpopular with people at the time. Further evidence to support this is the failure of the Amicable Grant of 1525. Wolsey set about raising funds to invade France by attempting to levy a tax, without the approval of parliament. This led to protests and refusal to pay, showing that people at the time were not willing to finance an invasion of France.

Another point against the view that success in foreign policy outweighed the failures is that Henry’s foreign policy was too costly. We learn this from Source 6 where Armstrong calls English foreign policy ‘short-sighted, costly and out of date’. He refers to how little even the successful campaigns of 1512-13 brought to England and tells us that £1.4 million was spent on wars in the years 1511-25, money Armstrong considers was ‘squandered’. English tax revenue was vastly inferior to that of France or the Empire, because of England’s much smaller population.

Source 6 is against the view that success in foreign policy outweighed the failures, as it suggests that Henry’s allies often let him down. Armstrong tells us that Charles V, when allied with Henry, increasingly pursued his own aims and ambitions after 1521. Further evidence of this is in 1525 after the Battle of Pavia, as Charles had no interest in Henry’s proposal that they invade France together.

Overall, i disagree with the view that successes in foreign policy outweighed the failures. Henry failed to invade France as the operation was too costly and not backed by contemporaries. England’s scant resources were simply not enough to finance glory on the scale that Henry wanted it and as a result he often had to rely on allies who let him down. The people of England did not support Henry in his aims, which shows just how little his foreign policy brought England.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

History

...as important as Henry.” However it was not the dispensation that caused concern, it was a text from Deuteronomy that claimed Henry was infact right in marrying Catherine as Deuteronomy claimed that if a mans brother dies and he and his wife are without child, then it is the brother’s role to raise his widow. This essentially proved Henry’s claim wrong, weakening his case. However, despite the opposition based on biblical teachings, this was not a large concern as Source 2 and 3 highlight, Wolsey... View Full Essay Join Now Please login to view the full essay... Essay's Statistics Submitted by: kirstymackinlay Date shared: 11/07/2012 02:21 PM Words: 904 Pages: 4 Save Paper Report this Essay Similar Documents Do You Agree With The View That The Main Reasons For Henry's Failure To Obtain The Annulment Of His Marriage In The Years 1525-29 Was The Determined Opposition Of Katherine Of Aragon? Do You Agree With The View That The Main Reason For Henry’s Failure To Obtain...

Words: 820 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Bgcse History

...TOPIC 1: THE AMERINDIANS Week 1: THE ARAWAKS (Theme One) PAPER: CORE CONTENT----BAHAMIAN-WEST INDIAN HISTORY References: Bahamian History Bk.I by Bain, G. Macmillan,1983 2.Caribbean story Bk. I and II By Claypole, W Longman (new edition) 1987 3. Development to Decolonization by Greenwood R, Macmillan, 1987 4.Caribbean people Bk.I by Lennox Honeychurch. Nelson, 1979 The Migration of the Indians to the New World. It is believed that the people who Columbus saw when he came to the New World were nomadic hunters from central and East Asia who followed the buffalo and deer. When the herds moved, people moved after them because they were dependent on the animals for food. It is therefore suspected that the herds led the people out of Asia by the north-east, across the Bering Strait and into North America. They crossed the sea by an ice –bridge when it was frozen over during the last Ice-Age. They did not know that they were crossing water from one continent to another. Map 1 Amerindians migration from central Asia into North America. The Amerindians settled throughout North America and were the ancestors of the many Red Indian tribes we know today, as well as the Eskimos in the far north. In general, they were nomadic but some followed settled agricultural pursuits and developed civilizations of their own like the Mayas in South America (check internet reference for profile on this group, focus on...

Words: 69958 - Pages: 280

Free Essay

Japan Trade Laws

...Country Commerce Japan Released September 2011 The Economist Intelligence Unit 750 Third Avenue New York NY 10017 USA Economist Intelligence Unit The Economist Intelligence Unit is a specialist publisher serving companies establishing and managing operations across national borders. For 60 years it has been a source of information on business developments, economic and political trends, government regulations and corporate practice worldwide. The Economist Intelligence Unit delivers its information in four ways: through its digital portfolio, where the latest analysis is updated daily; through printed subscription products ranging from newsletters to annual reference works; through research reports; and by organising seminars and presentations. The firm is a member of The Economist Group. London Economist Intelligence Unit 26 Red Lion Square London WC1R 4HQ United Kingdom Tel: (44.20) 7576 8000 Fax: (44.20) 7576 8500 E-mail: london@eiu.com Hong Kong Economist Intelligence Unit 60/F, Central Plaza 18 Harbour Road Wanchai Hong Kong Tel: (852) 2585 3888 Fax: (852) 2802 7638 E-mail: hongkong@eiu.com New York Economist Intelligence Unit The Economist Group 750 Third Avenue 5th Floor New York, NY 10017, US Tel: (1.212) 554 0600 Fax: (1.212) 586 0248 E-mail: newyork@eiu.com Geneva Economist Intelligence Unit Boulevard des Tranchées 16 1206 Geneva Switzerland Tel: (41) 22 566 2470 Fax: (41) 22 346 93 47 E-mail: geneva@eiu.com This report can be accessed electronically as...

Words: 52449 - Pages: 210

Premium Essay

Marketing

...Review of Marketing Research Review of Marketing Research VOLUME 1 Naresh K. Malhotra Editor M.E.Sharpe Armonk, New York London, England 4 AUTHOR Copyright © 2005 by M.E.Sharpe, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without written permission from the publisher, M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 80 Business Park Drive, Armonk, New York 10504. Library of Congress ISSN: 1548-6435 ISBN 0-7656-1304-2 (hardcover) Printed in the United States of America The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z 39.48-1984. ~ MV (c) 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 CHAPTER TITLE 5 REVIEW OF MARKETING RESEARCH EDITOR: NARESH K. MALHOTRA, GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Editorial Board Rick P. Bagozzi, Rice University Ruth Bolton, Arizona State University George Day, University of Pennsylvania Morris B. Holbrook, Columbia University Michael Houston, University of Minnesota Shelby Hunt, Texas Tech University Dawn Iacobucci, Northwestern University Arun K. Jain, University at Buffalo, State University of New York Barbara Kahn, University of Pennsylvania Wagner Kamakura, Duke University Donald Lehmann, Columbia University Robert F. Lusch, University of Arizona Kent B. Monroe, University of Illinois, Urbana A. Parasuraman, University of Miami William Perreault, University of North Carolina Robert A. Peterson, University...

Words: 167068 - Pages: 669