Free Essay

Do You Agree with the View That in Domestic Policy, Wolsey Was Successful as the Kings Chief Minister?

In: Historical Events

Submitted By bigcock
Words 960
Pages 4
Do you agree with the view that in domestic policy, Wolsey was successful as the kings chief minister?
Yes, in my opinion I believe that Wolsey was successful as the king’s chief minister. He did have his ups and downs for example promoting civil law over common law but then not actually making any long lasting changes to the judicial system. His new system the subsidy raised £325,000 from 1513-1529 compared to £90,000 raised from fifteenths and tenths which is definitely a success. However he was responsible for the amicable grant which caused rebellions in 1925. Source 9 agrees that Wolsey was a success whereas Source 7 completely disagrees and source 8 says that he had his up and downs but mostly suggests failure.
Source 7 is an extract from Geoffrey Elton’s introduction to A.F. Pollards Wolsey, published in 1965. It suggests that actually Wolsey was not successful as the king’s chief minister. It tells us that Wolsey was ‘amateurish and uncreative’ in government and that even with the church he was only ‘moderately successful’. It suggest that Wolsey tried to do the impossible, he wanted to ‘rule as king when he was not king’ which again indicates that he was not successful as the kings chief minister as he was trying to take over the kings role. I agree to a certain extent because Wolsey was only trying to secure his own position rather than making any real reforms but I don’t believe that he was ‘amateurish and uncreative’ in government because if he was I don’t think that Henry would of made him Lord Chancellor and following that making him cardinal. I also believe that Wolsey wasn’t just moderately successful with the church as well because if he was only moderately successful then he wouldn’t have been appointed legate a latere. Therefore I only partly agree with what is suggested in the source as I still would say that actually Wolsey was successful as the king’s chief minister.
Source 8 is an extract from John Guy, Tudor England, published in 1988. It suggests that Wolsey had some success and some failure with regard to being successful as the king’s chief minister. It says ‘Wolsey had no guiding political principles’ which suggests that politically Wolsey was not successful. However he also says ‘his policies had the effect of centralising English politics’ however later he claims that it was ‘unintentional’. This actually suggests that yes he did have some success but it was unintentional. I agree that yes Wolsey was successful politically as Parliament only met twice and only used them to try and raise taxes. He also purged the privy chamber in 1519 and potential threats to his power were sent away from the court to complete more mundane jobs. Therefore again I can only partially agree with this source because it claims that Wolsey had limited success but I believe he was succesful.
Source 9 is a contemporary source from George Cavendish’s biography of cardinal Wolsey and it was written between 1556 and 1558. It suggests that Wolsey’s domestic policy was brilliant. He describes it as the best ever authority and rule in England. For example he writes ‘I never saw this kingdom in better order, quietness and obedience’. Which gives us the impression his domestic policy was a huge success. If it wasn’t a success it wouldn’t be described as the best ever. It also argues that his law and order was successful as it says ‘nor justice better administrated’. This tells us he was very good at administrating justice. I believe that he is right about Wolsey’s justice side of domestic policy as Wolsey took legal action against noble who had enclosed land illegally from 1517 onwards. I don’t agree however with this idea that the kingdom had never been seen in such quietness. As in 1525 there were rebellions as a result of the amicable grant which was put forward by Wolsey. Due to the George Cavendish was Wolsey’s closet companion you can’t not question the reliability of this source. I do think that Cavendish may have exaggerated slightly by saying ‘I never saw this kingdom in better order’ but I wouldn’t say he’s made anything up about Wolsey as what he says can be backed up with evidence. This source does agree with the view that in domestic policy, Wolsey was successful as the king’s chief minister and I agree with it a certain extent.
In conclusion, even though two historians believe that Wolsey wasn’t a success I’m going to disagree with them and say that actually yes he was a success. You can’t say that someone who has done a lot of good for his country is a failure. Yes he has done some wrong but in ratio he has done a lot more right than wrong. Source 7 suggests that he was amateurish and uncreative but I don’t believe that an amateur can put together this subsidy which was quite complex going against this suggestion of him being uncreative that raised a lot of taxes for the king. He did have his failures like the amicable grant which caused a revolution but one revolution in the whole time he was henrys chief minister is not bad at all. He also caused resentment from the nobles and they often made late payments. There is no way of making everyone in the country happy as they all want different things so you can’t call him a failure for that either. Even though source 9 is properly slightly biased due to the fact George Cavendish was Wolsey’s closet companion I’m going to agree with him that Wolsey was a success due to the many successes he had with domestic policy.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay


...Essays: How far do the sources agree that? Introduction:    Explain what you can learn from each source Briefly cross reference the sources Provide an argument in response to the question Main paragraphs:     State a similarity or difference between the sources – make sure you focus on ‘How Far’ Select relevant information from the sources to support this point Place this in context using your brief own knowledge Use provenance to explain this similarity/difference Conclusion:  Sum up how far the sources agree based on content and provenance Section B Essays: Do you agree with the view that? Introduction:   State your line of argument – how far do you agree with the view? State the main similarities and differences between the sources Main paragraphs:  State a reason for yes/no. Make sure you phrase this in a way that links to your line of argument and answers the question. Remember that each source will suggest a different reason for yes/no. Support this reason with evidence from the sources and your own knowledge Cross-reference between the sources Weigh up the evidence of the sources. Consider provenance for primary sources and judge secondary sources based on the evidence included and the weight given to certain evidence Link back to your line of argument     Conclusion:  Explain how your argument has been proven with reference to the sources and your own knowledge Unit 2 – Pre-Reformation Church Key Questions: 1. How important was the Church......

Words: 34668 - Pages: 139

Free Essay

The Tudors

...The Tudors: A Very Short Introduction VERY SHORT INTRODUCTIONS are for anyone wanting a stimulating and accessible way in to a new subject. They are written by experts, and have been published in more than 25 languages worldwide. The series began in 1995, and now represents a wide variety of topics in history, philosophy, religion, science, and the humanities. Over the next few years it will grow to a library of around 200 volumes- a Very Short Introduction to everything from ancient Egypt and Indian philosophy to conceptual art and cosmology. Very Short Introductions available now: ANCIENT P H I L O S O P H Y Julia Annas THE ANGLO-SAXON AGE John Blair ANIMAL RIGHTS David DeGrazia ARCHAEOLOGY Paul Bahn ARCHITECTURE Andrew Ballantyne ARISTOTLE Jonathan Barnes ART HISTORY Dana Arnold ARTTHEORY Cynthia Freeland THE HISTORYOF ASTRONOMY Michael Hoskin ATHEISM Julian Baggini AUGUSTINE HenryChadwick BARTHES Jonathan Culler THE B I B L E John Riches BRITISH POLITICS Anthony Wright BUDDHA Michael Carrithers BUDDHISM DamienKeown CAPITALISM James Fulcher THE CELTS Barry Cunliffe CHOICETHEORY Michael Allingham CHRISTIAN ART Beth Williamson CLASSICS Mary Beard and John Henderson CLAUSEWITZ Michael Howard THE COLD WAR Robert McMahon CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY Simon Critchley COSMOLOGY Peter Coles CRYPTOGRAPHY Fred Piper and Sean Murphy DADAAND SURREALISM David Hopkins DARWIN Jonathan Howard DEMOCRACY Bernard Crick DESCARTES TomSorell DRUGS Leslie Iversen TH E EARTH Martin Redfern......

Words: 34946 - Pages: 140

Free Essay


...a de luxe edition, illustrated in full-colour, and the other is an ordinary edition without illustrations. The material in the book has been further updated where called for. It has been felt necessary in particular to revise some material in the chapters dealing with adjectives, active and passive voice, articles and prepositions. Appendix I, which deals with American English, has been expanded. Appendix II has been replaced with a newer set of tests covering the important areas of grammar. It was in the year 1972 that the shrewd visionary Mr. Shyam Lai Gupta obtained the permission of Manecji Cooper Education Trust for the revision of this book and commissioned me to revise it thoroughly. The revised edition came out in 1973 and was well received. One of the main features of the revised edition was the addition of a great deal of new material (such as the three chapters on structures) based on the new developments in the study of English structure and usage. Subsequently the book was revised every four or five years and most...

Words: 211294 - Pages: 846

Premium Essay

Harold Bloom

...Bloom’s Classic Critical Views W i l l ia m Sha k e Sp e a r e Bloom's Classic Critical Views alfred, lord Tennyson Benjamin Franklin The Brontës Charles Dickens edgar allan poe Geoffrey Chaucer George eliot George Gordon, lord Byron henry David Thoreau herman melville Jane austen John Donne and the metaphysical poets John milton Jonathan Swift mark Twain mary Shelley Nathaniel hawthorne Oscar Wilde percy Shelley ralph Waldo emerson robert Browning Samuel Taylor Coleridge Stephen Crane Walt Whitman William Blake William Shakespeare William Wordsworth Bloom’s Classic Critical Views W i l l ia m Sha k e Sp e a r e Edited and with an Introduction by Sterling professor of the humanities Yale University harold Bloom Bloom’s Classic Critical Views: William Shakespeare Copyright © 2010 Infobase Publishing Introduction © 2010 by Harold Bloom All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage or retrieval systems, without permission in writing from the publisher. For more information contact: Bloom’s Literary Criticism An imprint of Infobase Publishing 132 West 31st Street New York NY 10001 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data William Shakespeare / edited and with an introduction by Harold Bloom : Neil Heims, volume editor. p. cm. — (Bloom’s classic critical views) Includes bibliographical references...

Words: 239932 - Pages: 960

Free Essay


...62118 0/nm 1/n1 2/nm 3/nm 4/nm 5/nm 6/nm 7/nm 8/nm 9/nm 1990s 0th/pt 1st/p 1th/tc 2nd/p 2th/tc 3rd/p 3th/tc 4th/pt 5th/pt 6th/pt 7th/pt 8th/pt 9th/pt 0s/pt a A AA AAA Aachen/M aardvark/SM Aaren/M Aarhus/M Aarika/M Aaron/M AB aback abacus/SM abaft Abagael/M Abagail/M abalone/SM abandoner/M abandon/LGDRS abandonment/SM abase/LGDSR abasement/S abaser/M abashed/UY abashment/MS abash/SDLG abate/DSRLG abated/U abatement/MS abater/M abattoir/SM Abba/M Abbe/M abbé/S abbess/SM Abbey/M abbey/MS Abbie/M Abbi/M Abbot/M abbot/MS Abbott/M abbr abbrev abbreviated/UA abbreviates/A abbreviate/XDSNG abbreviating/A abbreviation/M Abbye/M Abby/M ABC/M Abdel/M abdicate/NGDSX abdication/M abdomen/SM abdominal/YS abduct/DGS abduction/SM abductor/SM Abdul/M ab/DY abeam Abelard/M Abel/M Abelson/M Abe/M Aberdeen/M Abernathy/M aberrant/YS aberrational aberration/SM abet/S abetted abetting abettor/SM Abeu/M abeyance/MS abeyant Abey/M abhorred abhorrence/MS abhorrent/Y abhorrer/M abhorring abhor/S abidance/MS abide/JGSR abider/M abiding/Y Abidjan/M Abie/M Abigael/M Abigail/M Abigale/M Abilene/M ability/IMES abjection/MS abjectness/SM abject/SGPDY abjuration/SM abjuratory abjurer/M abjure/ZGSRD ablate/VGNSDX ablation/M ablative/SY ablaze abler/E ables/E ablest able/U abloom ablution/MS Ab/M ABM/S abnegate/NGSDX abnegation/M Abner/M abnormality/SM abnormal/SY ab......

Words: 113589 - Pages: 455