regarding Alexis as a student as well as that she too thought you did not have to source the bio.

During the investigative part of this case, Brett Meadors and Luke Donohoo both sated they could not look at any additional information including the letter from Professor Hausch. What type of fair and impartial investigations does not review all of the evidence?

Alexis and Paul did meet with Dean Robert Ulmer who indicted that both of the issues affecting Alexis could be resolved very easily. Issue #1 plagiarism #2 Instructor Espin told Alexis that she would not get anything higher than a C, and she made sure that she dragged reviewing the assignments long enough to make sure they were past the due date. Espin would not accept the final two exercise that Alexis completed. Exercise 8 social media if accepted would have given Alexis a B, the final exercise 9 digital news room if Espin had accepted this then Alexis would have an A for the class. Dean Ulmer suggested Alexis and Paul meet with Instructor Espin and Chair Dr. Mullen.

Alexis and her dad Paul, meet with Instructor Espin, Department Chair Larry Mullen. Espin …show more content…
Paul did tell the dean, this was finals week and didn’t want to waste Alexi’s valuable time if we are unable to get this resolved. Ulmer set up a meeting for the following day at 1:00 pm, with Burns, Espin and we thought Ulmer. However, Ulmer never showed for the meeting. The meeting was a waste of time Espin didn’t say anything except Alexi’s good luck with your finals. Burns was very cocky, stating how wonderful everything student conduct did including on numerous occasions how local judges had nothing but praise for his office. Burns had an agenda including makes sure he notified Paul that he was not allowed to speak and that both of his staff thought Paul was very