Dr Pepper Snapple Group Energy Drink Case Study

In: Business and Management

Submitted By Samueljk
Words 1334
Pages 6


Definition of the problem
The Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. senior company management has developed a corporate strategy to target high-growth and high-margin beverage businesses. The firm is the only major domestic nonalcoholic beverage company in the US without a significant branded energy drink of its own while this beverage market is the fastest growing category. Dr Pepper Snapple group needs to determine if a market opportunity exists to introduce its own, new energy drink brand. In order to effectively evaluate the benefits of entering the energy beverage market, the company needs to identify a consumer group where a favorable opportunity exists, and develop a brand differentiation strategy that effectively appeals to that market.
1. The company may choose to remain inactive in the energy drink market. The company has a significant market share in the carbonated soft drink (CSD) segment and participates in other major beverage markets as well. The company achieves strong operating margins and stable cash flows from other businesses. Choosing not to enter the energy drink market is unlikely to impact the company’s performance in these other successful businesses.
2. The company may choose to introduce a new energy drink brand to the market. This alternative would expose the company to the fastest growing and fourth largest nonalcoholic beverage category in the United States (in 2006). The company’s objective would be to achieve profitable growth using this approach.
Evaluation of alternatives
For evaluation, a SWOT analysis is used to indicate the firm’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats.
The company’s strengths:
1. Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. owns a diverse portfolio of well-known CSD and non-CSD brands.
2. The company…...

Similar Documents

Dr. Pepper Snapple Group Case Study

... on the world around them. Also, an important trend in the macro environment is globalization. With the growing use of electronic technological innovations, global communication is rapidly increasing. This allows firms to collaborate within the country market and expand internationally into world markets. (Hoovers) Industrial Analysis Dr. Pepper Snapple Group competes in the U.S. beverage manufacture and bottling industry which is composed of about 3,000 companies including manufacturers, bottlers, and distributers of non-alcoholic beverages. The main product lines of the industry are carbonated soft drinks, fruit beverages, bottled water, so-called functional beverages (including energy drinks and ready-to-drink teas and coffees), and sport drinks. The soft drink industry is made up of two major manufacturing systems that fall into distinct categories: (1) flavoring syrup and concentrate manufacturing and (2) soft drink manufacturing. The supply chain is largely dependent on the syrup producer, as this is the driver for most downstream operations. The majority of the bottled soft drinks follow a similar product life cycle, moving from syrup producer, to bottler, to distributor, to merchant, to final consumer. The principal raw materials used in the beverage industry are cans and ends, glass bottles, PET bottles and caps, paper products, sweeteners, juice, fruit, water and other ingredients. Major retailers associated with the beverage industry include Wal-Mart, Target......

Words: 1991 - Pages: 8

Energy Drink Study

... to the authors expectations, the impact of energy drinks on quality of life and well-being was equivocal, and requires further research, perhaps examining the specific different components in the drinks, as well as when people use them. Researchers in a study titled A taurine and caffeine-containing drink stimulates cognitive performance and well-being measured the effects of caffeine, taurine and glucuronolactone on people’s cognitive functioning and well-being. Predictions by Seidl et al. were that individuals who consume the three compounds will experience elevated mood and greater cognitive ability that those who did not have the mixture. The study was conducted using two groups, one containing five individuals who got the three mixture compound, and the other containing five people who served as the control group who received placebos. The groups had caffeine users and non-caffeine users in order to rule out caffeine withdrawal. Each group was tested at night time when the participants were feeling less energized and closer to becoming sleepy. Data that was collected shows that people who used the energy drink supplements displayed a higher cognitive functioning and displayed a more elevated mood than those in the placebo group. Individuals who use energy supplements, specifically energy beverages, experience short term benefits, even when the they are tired. Measurements were taken based on the single dose of energy supplements, and there is no data in this......

Words: 5002 - Pages: 21

Case Study on Dr Snapple Group Inc.

...UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA KOTA SAMARAHAN CAMPUS MKT750 MARKETING MANAGEMENT CASE STUDY DR PEPPER SNAPPLE GROUP, INC. ENERGY BEVERAGE PREPARED BY: RAMSIS ANAK WILLIAM AGIM 2012402536 Strategic Issues and Problems Being the consultant of Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. (DPSG), I am charged to assess whether or not a profitable market opportunity existed for a new energy beverage brand to be produced, marketed, and distributed by the company. The decision to explore a new energy beverage was made by senior company management of DPSG as part of a corporate business strategy to focus on opportunities in (1) High Growth and (2) High Margin beverage businesses. My tasks involve a number of important factors. I must assess the likelihood that DPSG Competitive environment will be liberal or conservative in its marketing of the new energy beverage. An important consideration is DPSG role in affecting this environment, given its strong presence in the CSD market and utilizing that strength to push the new energy beverage. Ultimately I must make a “go-no go” decision. A “go” decision requires a recommendation in the form of the new energy beverage, its target market, its price, and promotion. A “no go” decision must take into consideration Dr Pepper’s profit and growth position without the new energy beverage and measures to minimize their impact. The problem facing Dr Pepper’s is how to retain its present competitive position given an environmental...

Words: 2416 - Pages: 10

Dr. Pepper Snapple Group

...Dr. Pepper-Snapple Company Kim Hayes Deonta Samilton Jordan Narcisse Tori Wallar Professor Cary Accounting November 11, 2013 Section 2: Introduction Dr. Pepper-Snapple Group, Inc. 5301 Legacy Dr. Plano, TX 75024 Industry: Beverages (Non-Alcoholic) Sic Code: 2080- Beverages Major Products: Canada Dry (Ginger ale,) 7-up (lemon-lime,) A&W (Root beer,) Sunkist (Orange,) and Sun Drop (Citrus.) Competitors: Coca-Cola and PepsiCo. Stock exchange: 47.33 Ticker symbol: DPS Name of outside auditors: Deloitte & Touche, LLP SIC (Standard Industry Classification): 2080 Beverages * History: Today, Dr Pepper Snapple Group is one of the leading producers of flavored beverages in North America and Caribbean. The have 6 of the top 10 non-cola drinks, and 13 of their 14 leading brands are ranked in the top two of its flavor categories. The DPS market more than 50 brands of carbonated soft drinks, juices, teas, mixers, water, and other premium beverages. Dr Pepper Snapple group include: 7UP, A&W, Canada Dry, Clamato, Crush, Hawaiian Punch, Mott's, Mr. & Mrs. T mixers, Penafiel, Rose's, Schweppes, Squirt and Sunkist soda. We are able to thank DPS for inventing the first carbonated drink. In 1783, Jean Jacob Schweppes created the world’s first carbonated mineral water. Schweppes’s was the original inventor of this new product, shared his invention with a young pharmacist in Waco, Texas, named Charles Alderton. They both invented Dr Pepper...

Words: 2880 - Pages: 12

Dr Pepper Snapple Group

...Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. Energy Beverages Author: Ravi Sockalingam, PhD Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc.’s brand manager Andrew Barker was tasked with recommending the company’s top management if it should decide to introduce a new branded product into the energy beverage market. A brief overview of the company’s position Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. maintains a well-entrenched position in the flavored carbonated soft drink (CSD) market. In 2007 he held a market share of the US CSD market. And this share had been steadily growing year to year. The company is also a leader in the non-CSD drink category that comprises ready to drink tea, juice, juice drinks, enhanced water, drink concentrates and mixer categories. In addition to these beverages, the company also manufactures Mott’s apple sauce. Why Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. is considering introducing a new energy drink? There are several strengths the company has. There is high brand awareness and a strong diverse portfolio of consumer preferred products. Their business model as far as ownership, bottling and distribution go, is very well integrated and robust. The top management is also very experienced with an average of 20 years in the food and beverage industry behind them. Plus, the company has a long standing relationship with major retailers and third party distributors. Through their extensive networks they have the capability to reach out to most geographical areas of the US. The company has...

Words: 1398 - Pages: 6

Case Study - Dr Pepper

...Practice Case 1: Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc: Energy Beverages 1. How would you characterise the energy beverage category, competitors, consumers, channels, and DPSG’s category participation in late 2007? Energy Beverage Category: Energy drinks provide consumers with a boost of energy and they fall under the category of functional drinks. Functional drinks are non-alcoholic drinks which include ingredients such as herbs, vitamins, minerals, amino acids or other nutritional ingredients. Other functional drinks include sport drinks, teas, fruit drinks and enhanced water drink. DPSG participation → In the US and Canada, Dr Pepper Snapple Group participated primarily in the flavoured carbonated soft drink (CSD) market segment Competitor: The largest non-alcoholic beverage category, after carbonated soft drinks, sport drinks, and bottled water, but the fastest growing one. DPSG participation → their major competitors include Red Bull, Monster Energy, and Coca Cola. Consumers: Average US per capita consumption of energy beverage drinkers increased by 14% since 2004. Predominantly consumed by males aged between 12- 34 during the afternoon or morning. The reasons for consumption include energy boost, mental alertness and taste. Most limit their options to 1.4 different brands which sheds light on strong brand loyalty. DPSG participation → DPSG have an attractive positioning within a large, growing, and profitable market. Channels: Distribution channels include...

Words: 864 - Pages: 4

Dr Pepper Snapple Case

...TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY CORPUS CHRISTI MARKETING MANAGEMENT - MKT 5320 CASE STUDY ANALYSIS: Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc: Energy Beverages OLUSUBOMI Y. ADETUNJI STUDENT ID: A03936869 PROBLEM DEFINITION. Dr Pepper Snapple Group Inc., a non-alcoholic beverage producing company decided to enter into the market with a new product (energy drink) and they were faced with some problems along the line. They decided to introduce an energy beverage brand to the market (existing market) which already has competitors. With this as focus, it was important to choose best market and distribution channels and some other business strategies for the product in order for it to be a success. The problem faced includes retainment of its present competitive position in the market with other energy drink companies and at the same time preserving profitability and customer base. In order to maintain the market competition, the business strategy to launch the new products into the market was very vital. Some of the factors that has to be considered before the product launch is considered are: * Industry Experience * Customer base * Profitablity growth * Favorable market condition * Core competencies * Management Team Decision. ALTERNATIVES PROVISIONS FOR PRODUCT SUCCESS The company could carefully select the strategy to launch the new product into the market to understand both the strength of their current competitive position and the strength of...

Words: 701 - Pages: 3

Dr Pepper Snapple Marketing

...Dr. Pepper Snapple Energy Marketing Plan Executive statement: At Dr. Pepper Snapple we are releasing a new energy drink product line in which we will be appealing to the needs of those over the age of 25. We are releasing two new types and flavors of drinks. The first is the low calorie low sugar named; AcaiPom Berry. This will be a mix of acai berry fruit and pomegranates. We strive to use all natural fruits and products when producing our energy drinks. No high fructose corn syrup will be used in either product. The second product we are releasing is our Citrus Refresh Absolute Zero. This product is a zero everything citrus flavored drink. It is designed to energize and refresh its consumers. The citrus refresh line will be most appealing to those in the 30-60 age range, but will also suffice for those who chose healthy life styles in any age range. It is important that individuals understand that we are producing a “Clean” energy product that will not place all the harmful sugars in the bodies of its consumers. “Clean energy is not only important for our environment, it is important for our bodies as well.” Clean energy is upon us in all forms, so why not in our bodies as well. Individuals of the sophisticated and aged market cannot break down complex carbs and sugars. Our marketing plan for our products will be to target places the desired age group is. Our drinks will come in 12 Oz quantities focusing on a leek slender design that for the sophisticated market. The...

Words: 1316 - Pages: 6

Dr. Pepper Snapple Group Inc.

...1) What is the problem? Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. Marketing Executive Andrew Barker led the launch of Accelerade RTD into the USA market, this company is the only major non-alcoholic beverage company in the USA and they are entering a new segment, stepping into new waters from their usual CSD (carbonated soft drinks) and ready-made tea market. The idea to enter this market leads to a huge doubt as the Energy Beverages segment is a field with very well established competitors and up and coming fierce medium sized companies (Vendite, 2010). a) Alternative one We can confidently say that an open door for the brand RTD Accelerade exists, since it would separate effortlessly from other energy refreshments as sound item, and item that is intended to fulfill needs of the individuals who needs to frequently do sports which is a huge business sector comprised of 35,000 Americans who practice consistently. The essential advantages of item are unmistakable in its belongings such are: Extends Endurance, Speeds Muscle Recovery, Reduces Muscle Damage, improves Recovery. As indicated by specified certainties about the business, item and organization, presenting RTD Accelerade appears to be as an alluring option for Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc (Vendite, 2010). b) Alternative two Energy beverages have turned reality into a multibillion-dollar industry in the US. Drink Digest reported that retail offers of caffeinated beverages in the US expanded by 16...

Words: 1215 - Pages: 5

Dr. Pepper Snapple Group

...Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc.-Energy Beverages Teshia McSwain Columbia Southern Introduction Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc.-Energy Beverages initiated its triumph in business back in 1983 offering some of the most well-known beverages. Like any other businesses, this company has extreme competitors including Coca Cola and Pepsi, among others. However, the company faces challenges with an absence for energy drinks among its products (Hitt et al. 2013). Not only does Dr. Pepper Snapple Group not offer any energy drinks in their product offering; but they are a late adopter into the business. In addition, some of the other challenges Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. face include competition by major companies like Redbull, Coca Cola’s “Full Throttle”, and Pepsi’s “Amp Energy” among others. Another major threat is the pricing competition that tends to lower the company’s profits. Brand loyalty may be a major hindrance for this company, although their strategy in market entrance will determine their success. Another factor that will hinder Dr. Pepper Snapple group is the lack of as global presence like its competitors. A study by Smith (2013) asserts that the energy beverage market is a growing market because it is the 4th largest nonalcoholic beverage category and the fastest growing one after the carbonated soft drinks and sports drinks among others. Further study shows that 2001-2006 the total energy beverage retail sales increased to 42.5% annual rate with a...

Words: 419 - Pages: 2

Case: Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc.: Energy Beverages

...Case: Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc.: Energy Beverages Texas A&M Corpus Christi Marketing Management MKTG-5320 Case: Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc.: Energy Beverages Introduction Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. decided in September of 2007 to explore the profitability of expanding into the energy beverage market. Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. is a major competitor in the flavored carbonated soft drink (CSD) market, and also has a strong presence in the non-CSD market. The energy beverage market had an estimated $6.2 billion in retail dollar sales in 2006. The market grew at an average annual rate of 42.5 percent between 2001 and 2006, however, market industry experts estimated an average annual growth rate of 10.5 percent between 2007 and 2011. This slowing of growth was due to a number of factors: market maturity, an increase in price and packaging competition, and new entrants to the market in hybrid energy drinks, ready to drink energy teas, and energy colas. Analysis Strengths The strengths of Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. include: * A network of bottling and distribution throughout the United State, Canada, and Mexico * Stable cash flows * Substantial portfolio of diverse and well known CSD and non-CSD brands with a position as the number one CSD company in the United State. * Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. believes is holds a competitive advantage with its integrated business model * Strong customer relationships Opportunities...

Words: 792 - Pages: 4

Full Dr Pepper Case Study

... 1.0 Introduction : Nowadays, marketplace is fundamentally different as a result of major societal forces that have resulted in many new consumer and organization capabilities. These forces have created new opportunities and challenges and marketing management has changed significantly in recent years as organization seeks new ways to achieve marketing excellence. Furthermore, to maintain the product’s reputation in the market, organization focuses on branding the product internally and externally through market targeting and product positioning in order to increase organization sales volume and gaining trust from their respective consumers on their products. 2.0CASE SUMMARY The case is about three companies with 90% of the market share control the carbonated soft drink industry in the United States. These companies include in order of market share size, CocaCola, Pepsi Co, and Dr. Pepper/7Up. These three companies also represent the top ten selling brands in the United States market. In the United States, people consume more carbonated drinks than tap water. Research has shown that the average American drinks about 53 gallons of soft drinks per year. However, soft drink consumption has declined over the past few years (Kerin & Peterson, 2004). The soft drink industry has three major participants in the production and distribution; concentrate producers, bottlers, and retail outlets. Concentrate producers are responsible for consumer advertising and promotion...

Words: 2551 - Pages: 11

Dr.Pepper Snapple Group Case Study

...Problems and Opportunities It is important to understand the primary problem being addressed throughout this case study: Whether or not a profitable market opportunity exists for a new energy beverage brand to be produced, marketed and distributed by the Dr. Pepper Snapple Group. In order to effectively answer the above question, there are a number of secondary questions that need to be answered to get the full picture. They are as follows: Who would the target market be? What would be the full product line and how would it be positioned within the market place? What marketing channels would be used? How would it be advertised and promoted? What would be the RSP and within which margins can it operate to remain profitable? Before answering these questions, it is important to highlight some of the external challenges that would face the company were they to go ahead and introduce a new energy drink. Firstly, there has been significant price erosion within the energy drink market, with energy drink prices declining by 30% between the years 2001 and 2006. This has been attributed to larger package sizes, the introduction of multi-packs, and the increasing availability in supermarkets, which operate with lower retail gross margins. Secondly, the market has also experienced product proliferation due to line extensions, new packaging and sizes, and market segmentation. Thirdly, DPSG needs to be aware of the changing attitudes of the consumer. The consumer is becoming more...

Words: 2686 - Pages: 11

Dr. Pepper Snapple Group

...1. How would you characterize the energy beverage category, competitors, consumers, channels, and DPSG’s category participation in late 2007? Category: - Functional Drinks -> Drinks boost consumers energy, non-alcoholic drinks. o Other Functional Drinks: Teas, enhanced water drink, fruit and sports drinks, o Ingredients: vitamins, herbs, minerals, amino acids. ϖ DPSG -> Dr. Pepper Snapple Group participated in the CSD flavored carbonated soft drink US and Canada market segment. - Competitor: o Second Largest non-alcoholic drink category. First largest beverage: carbonated soft drinks, sport drinks, and bottled water. o Fastest growing non-alcoholic industry. ϖ DPSG -> Competitors: Red Bull, Monster Energy, and Coca Cola. - Consumers: o Boosts consumers energy and good taste. o Consumed by males 12-34 years old during the morning and the afternoon. o According to the US per capita, energy drinks consumers increased 14% since 2004. o Average US per capita consumption of energy beverage drinkers increased by 14% since 2004. ϖ DPSG -> engaging position in the profitable, large, expanding market. - Channels: convenience stores and supermarkets. o Dominant retail channels to sell energy beverages. DPSG -> Broad distribution coverage and manufacture of the product. 2. Does your characterization bode well for a new energy beverage introduction generally and for Dr. Pepper Snapple Group in particular? DPSG will need to invest a lot of money...

Words: 576 - Pages: 3

Dr. Pepper Snapple Group Inc. Energy Beverages

...Arab Academy for Science & Technology Graduate Scholl Of Business (AAGSB) Doki Brach Master of Business Administration Program (MBA) Academic Year (Spring 2012) Table Of Contents 1. Question 1: 3 2. Question 2: 4 3. Question 3: 5 4. Question 4: 6 5. Question 5: 7 6. Question 6: 8 7. Question 7: 9 i. Part A: 9 ii. Part B: 9 iii. Part B: 10 8. Question 8: 10 9. Bonus Question 10 10. References: 11 MBA Marketing Exam Take-Home Exam Feel free to use lecture notes, the text book, and any other source. I am looking for your line of reasoning and applications rather than listing of what is already found in the book or slides. Question 1: Do you think this company is following the differentiation or cost leadership strategy? Why? Which growth strategy (market development, product development, diversification and market penetration) did they follow to improve their product portfolio sales? Reviewing Dr. Pepper Snapple Group Inc. case and assessing the situation to dr. Michael Porter generic strategies of achieving and maintaining competitive advantage, we may see that the company mostly was following the differentiation strategy as it is offering differentiated products from its competitors in many terms including the packing and pricing [pic...

Words: 1783 - Pages: 8