Free Essay

Drone Strikes

In: Other Topics

Submitted By aaronmirza
Words 785
Pages 4
Drone strikes under International Humanitarian Law
Feb 2, 2014
Aaron Mirza
If there is an armed conflict, the legality of any drone strike must then be evaluated in accordance with IHL, including particularly the fundamental principles of distinction, proportionality, humanity, and military necessity.
Distinction is particularly challenging in Federally Administered Tribal Areas, because fighters regularly intermingle with civilians, engage in routine activities and do not wear uniforms. None­theless, militaries engaged in an armed conflict must always attempt to distinguish between legit­mate and illegitimate targets for an attack.
Generally, “the civilian population as such, as well as individuals civilians, shall not be the object of attack.” Civilians lose this protection when they “take a direct part in hostilities.” Under the formulation of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) of what constitutes direct participation in hostilities, the act committed must adversely and directly affect the opposing party in a concrete manner or lead to the loss of life or property as part of a campaign in support of one party to a conflict. This definition adopts an approach focused on specific hostile acts of a certain magnitude rather than organizational membership or more indirect forms of support. The ICRC has further distinguished between civilians who participated in specific acts and those who maintain a continuous combatant function (CCF) by virtue of involvement on a “persistently recurrent basis.” While a civilian participating in a specific act becomes a permissible target during the execution of, and, in some formulations, the preparation of and deployment to and from the particular act, a person who maintains CCF status, under the ICRC formulation, may be targeted at any time. The recognition under IHL that, at times, a civilian can become akin to a regular combatant makes it “imperative that the other constituent parts of the [ICRC’s Interpretive] Guidance [on the Notion of Direct Participation in the Hostilities Under Humanitarian Law] (threshold of harm, causation, and belligerent nexus) not be diluted.” Even when a person is deemed to be a legitimate target of an attack, the attack must also satisfy IHL’s other core requirements. At a minimum, any attack must serve a legitimate military objective, and the expected harm or risk to civilians must not outweigh the expected military objective.
IHRL permits the intentional use of lethal force only when strictly necessary and proportionate. Thus, “targeted killings” as typically understood (intentional and premeditated killings) cannot be lawful under IHRL, which allows intentional lethal force only when necessary to protect against a threat to life, and where there are “no other means, such as capture or non-lethal incapacitation, of preventing that threat to life.” There is little public evidence that many of the targeted killings carried out fulfill this strict legal test. Indeed, and as described above, many particular strikes and practices suggest breaches of the test, including: signature strikes; strikes on rescuers; the administration’s apparent definition of “militant;” the lack of evidence of imminent threat; and the practice of extensive surveillance and presence on a list before killing.

The nature and effect of the US targeted killing policy may also contravene in some instances other sections of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), an international human rights treaty ratified by the US. Sections of the ICCPR potentially violated by US drone practice include Article 7 (prohibition on cruel, inhumane, and degrading treatment or punishment), Article 9.1 (right to liberty and security), Article 17 (right to freedom from arbitrary or unlawful interference with privacy, family, and home), Article 21 (right to peaceful assembly), and Article 22 (right to freedom of association). Thus, for example, Articles 21 and 22 might be violated where drone strike practices cause individuals to fear assembling in groups—as described by many interviewees—out of concern that they might be assumed to be engaged in suspicious activity that might result in a signature strike.
International law requires states to ensure basic transparency and accountability for wrongs. States must investigate war crimes allegations, and prosecute where appropriate. The obligation to be transparent is particularly relevant when there are civilian victims; indeed, some have argued that parties to an armed conflict are obligated to record civilian casualties. Further there is “emphasis on the obligation of states to investigate, prosecute and punish any alleged violation of the norms banning extrajudicial executions.” A proper investigation requires transparency: as the European Court of Human Rights explained, “There must be a sufficient element of public scrutiny of the investigation or its results to secure accountability in practice as well as in theory, maintain public confidence in the authorities’ adherence to the rule of law and prevent any appearance of collusion in or tolerance of unlawful acts.”

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Drone Strikes

...Drone Strikes, Effective Weapon in the War on Terrorism? William DeJarnette United States Diplomatic History November 21, 2014 September 7, 2009, in Machi Khel in Mir Ali, North Waziristan, Pakistan. At 20,000 feet death silently, stealthily, knifed its way through the afternoon sky. Two drones, operated by American Air Force drone pilots 7,000 miles away in Nevada, USA, had been hovering over the area throughout the day. Modern warfare and the fight against terrorism were about to greet Sadaullah Wazir and his family as they reentered their home after evening prayers in the garden. Moments later an explosive concussion from missiles launched by the drones rocked the neighborhood and body parts flew in every direction. Senior al Qaeda leader Ilyas Kashmiri was killed in his car as it entered the village. However, injured in the attack at the same time were fifteen-year-old Sadaullah and several others. Three of Wazir’s family members were killed. Wazir awoke in a hospital the next day, minus both legs and an eye. Objective met, target Kashmiri eliminated. Collateral damage is just another acceptable part of the plan. The Living Under Drones project interviewed Khalid Raheem, an elder in his community in Pakistan. Raheem is bewildered by the current state of affairs in his country. He states that they knew nothing about where the US was or what type of people lived there. They did know that the US supported the Taliban in their fight against the Soviets, until the......

Words: 2790 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

The Drone Strikes Again

...The Drone Strikes Again Take a moment and imagine this: for every terrorist killed by a U.S. drone strike, 50 Pakistani civilians fall victims to these ruthless attacks. According to an article written by David Kilcullen and Andrew McDonald from the NY Times, “press reports suggest that over the last three years drone strikes have killed about 14 terrorist leaders. But, according to Pakistani sources, they have also killed some 700 civilians. This is 50 civilians for every militant killed, a hit rate of 2 percent — hardly “precision”” (Killcullen, McDonald 9). Regardless if the number of casualties of innocent people caused by drone strikes has increased or decreased, the policy itself should be eliminated if there is even the slightest chance that innocent lives will be at stake. Kant was not a consequentialist theorist; in other words, he believed that despite the outcome of an action being good or bad, what was important was the premeditated idea behind the action, was it right or wrong, unrelated to the consequences. Therefore, if actions are not based on consequences, Kant’s theory would support the argument that using drone tactics to eliminate terrorists is morally unacceptable, for the following reasons: the U.S. military is using drone tactics against terrorist without their consent, and innocent lives are being taken at the push of a button. As humans, our moral duty is to treat people in such a way that shows them respect, as though they are autonomous beings......

Words: 967 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Drones Applications Into Logistics

...Drones applications into logistics – feasibility study Abstract The utilization of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) or drones in business applications can possibly drastically adjust a few commercial practices, and, all the while, change our dispositions and practices with respect to their effect on our day by day lives. The rise of UAVs into commercial applications will have to find a middle ground with the conventional ideas of wellbeing, security, protection, possession, obligation, and direction. With their capacity to gather information and improve logistics, drones are re-forming the way we ponder our physical surroundings. Notwithstanding, they likewise have been associated with being a reconnaissance gear, and their business use has been denounced by both people and dissident associations. In parallel, they have been legitimized by controls and licenses from government offices, and are utilized by organizations for reviewing, assessing, and imaging, and their mechanical advancement are driven by dynamic groups of specialists and fans of drone technology. This pressure presents extraordinary difficulties to their incorporation in the as of now existing open, legislative and private foundation. In this report, a couple of these issues to see how automatons could affect the advanced logistics, and provide suggestions for professionals, approach creators, and researchers concentrating on this technological marvel. Introduction The coming of new and developing......

Words: 2738 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Legal Issues Surrounding Defense Drones

...Introduction The term “drone” covers a wide variety of unmanned aerial vehicles. Drones range in size from one pound to 30,000 pounds. Various components can be added to a drone to increase its capability. Drones can be heat-seeking or capable of detecting certain chemicals, for example. Because of the variety of functions of drones, there is a great deal of interest in both public and private sectors in expanding drone usage. As drone use evolves in the United States, there are many legal ramifications to consider. This paper discusses current drone use, the future of drones, and the legal issues involved. Government Drone Use Drones or Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) have shifted the defense landscape not only in the US but also across various other nations. It is an additional layer of defense strategy that deviates from the traditional methods employed thus far. Although they may be used in strategically planned strikes, their primary purpose is in intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR). The US amongst other countries has been spearheading the advancement and use of this growing technology for the last decade. The Department of Defense operates approximately 8000 of these vehicles in their fleet. The use of drones by the US department of Defense is only one arm of the several other that is operated by the government. Customs and Border Protection Agency, Homeland Security, State fire departments and police departments are other significant users of this...

Words: 3474 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Argumentaive Drones

...Is the Use of Drone Military Tactics or not? In 2002 of February 4th history was made that allowed CIA and military to use such extraordinary equipment that made it safer for pilots and national security defense to use to spy on our enemies around the world without being noticed or even harming a human life at stake. But what can we really say that these drones let alone can be worth so much money of the tax payers that we don’t see the results that they are really made for.The drone was made and it was made for just that purpose in that world to help aid in the fight in counter-terrorism let alone not let any more of our military pilots put their lives at risk in dangerous zones. But due to recent events that lead to a sort of downfall in using these pilot less drones, is it actually worth the billions we spend on it to be used in the military or is it even worth having though due to some malfunctions of the drone killed innocent civilians not only from other lands, but our own American civilians as well. Does America really needs these drones that can help with the war on terror and costing us so much money let alone deaths, or do we need something different or not even the drones at all. Back in 2008 while I was serving in Afghanistan and right now I am gearing up for another tour right after the final week of school has ended, I remember hearing about the drones and what the purpose was for. At the time I could never really see one up close and let alone be in the......

Words: 2713 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Military Drones

...The Use of Armed Military Drones Should Be Banned The shape of warfare was changed dramatically over the past decades. In 2001 the armed military drone (unmanned aerial vehicle) was first used in warfare in Afghanistan (Schmit, E. (06.11.2002.)). Recently the world’s praise has been directed towards the military drone, which seems to be the perfect weapon for destruction. Although used more under Obama than Bush (Tschida, T. (26.09.2012.)) and responsible for the deaths of a number of Al Qaeda members the UAV has not been immune to criticism (Volker, K. (27.10.2012.)).[1] Drone attacks can be blamed for a growing irresponsibility as they create an emotional distance between the target and the attacker and lessen the possible losses. Furthermore, they have in no way eliminated the risks of collateral damage not to mention the unresolved issue with [3] promotion of warfare and extrajudicial killings as such. Therefore, the use of armed military drones should be banned. Military drones create more incentive for pilot irresponsibility. Not only does the distance from the actual warfare reduce the ability to fully comprehend the situation, but it also lessens the responsibility felt for the actions as the emotional contact is lacking and the pilot is in a safe situation where a mistake doesn’t mean possible harm coming to him/her. A comparison is often made between flying a drone and playing a video game. The similarity is so clear that even the United States Air Force uses...

Words: 1652 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Media Review

...Media Review Media Review Tyler Williamson SOC 110-02 Intro To Sociology U.S. Strike that Killed Hostages Could Change Drone Policies By Paul D. Shinkman April 23, 2015 3:40 p.m. Intelligence officials were unaware that hostages were at the site targeted by a U.S. strike in January despite “hundreds of hours" of surveillance, President Barack Obama said Thursday.  A signature element of President Barack Obama’s counterterrorism strategy sparked a critical backlash on Thursday, after the commander-in-chief admitted strikes in January along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border resulted in the accidental killing of two innocent hostages, along with the deaths of two American al-Qaida operatives. Obama took to the White House podium in a briefing Thursday morning to provide some details on the operations three months prior, details of which he has ordered declassified. U.S. officials confirmed in the aftermath of the strikes that aid workers Warren Weinstein, a 73-year-old American from Rockville, Maryland, and Giovanni Lo Porto, an Italian, had been accidentally killed in one strike. “On behalf of the U.S. government, we offer our deepest apologies to the families,” Obama said. Some aspects of the operation have to remain secret, he said, adding that “the U.S. is a democracy, committed to openness, in good times and in bad.” “It is a cruel and bitter truth that in the fog of war, generally, and in our fight against terrorists, specifically, mistakes and sometimes......

Words: 1348 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

What Does Representative Democracy Really Mean in the United States?

...What does Representative Democracy really mean in the United States? by Christian Gallardo Democracy has been traditionally defined as government by the people. However, here in the U.S. we know by democracy, what is known as representative democracy. In this model, the people transfer, through voting, their sovereignty to some “Representatives”. This model has been used over time to justify the exercises power of a social minority over the majority. To do this, they use legislative and presidential model, which uses the franchise as a way to assume the representation of the people, monopolizing the form of politics. The U.S. Constitution is clear about its political system, which is based on the representation and not in citizen participation. The important decisions are made by a very small group of people who are not accountable for what they do, so the people cannot do anything at the end against them as we are going to explain in this paper work. If we analyze the case of Wall Street in 2009 we realize that society has no way to reclaim their “Representatives" by act or omission errors they have committed. Nothing could be done to prevent the disgraced tycoon Bernard Lawrence "Bernie" Madoff through his investment firm that bears his name, swindled the American people the amount of US$ 50,000 million dollars. There was no law to protect the common citizen desires of unscrupulous businessmen on Wall Street. And though Madoff was sentenced to 150 years in prison...

Words: 838 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

The Counter Intelligence Community: Adequate Efficiency Within Our Ranks

...The Counter Intelligence Community Adequate Efficiency within Our Ranks American Military University Rodolfo Ivan Bustamante Professor Holden, Richard February 26, 2013 Counterintelligence is adequate only to those not directly affected by its lack of efficiency. CI adequacy is difficult to measure and its very status seems to be politically protected in secrecy. The American people are allowed to view things from the outside and cannot accurately provide a direct measure nor possess the slightest understanding of what really goes on behind closed doors. Measuring adequacy and efficiency requires benchmarks and detail accounts of mission failure or success. Classified information cannot be utilized in the equation, but at least the definition of the words can provide a basic understanding and from there begin to analyze unclassified information on various cases. Counterintelligence is defined by law as an embrace of both the collection of information and activities conducted to counter foreign intelligence threats (Cleave, 2007). In other words, it’s the ability to identify, assess, neutralize and exploit foreign intelligence out to cause harm to the United States of America and its citizens. Efficiency in general describes the extent to which time, effort or cost is well used for the intended task or purpose. It is often used with the specific purpose of relaying the capability of a specific application of effort to produce a specific outcome effectively......

Words: 1735 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Drones

...Use of Drone Strikes Abroad? The use of drones in the world has been known for some time now. Almost every country to this has day has acquired or has the technological advantages to industrialize these machines. There has always been a problem with should we send troops or not. Send missiles from home to our enemies. But now we send unmanned aerial vehicles or UAV’s that have no effect on American lives but cause chaos anywhere else. Here is the real issue. Should the United States continue to use drones, despite their long-term consequences, or should America deny itself the short-term effectiveness that drones provide? There is little question that armed UAVs are good at their job that is killing terrorists. Over 3,000 extremist operatives have been killed by drones since President Obama took office. However, the same tool that notices today’s terrorist seems to create the terrorist of tomorrow. Any supporter of drone use needs to recognize this reality, and opponents need to understand that drones offer strategic advantages that other means of addressing imminent threats do not. Many will ask what the victims did to deserve such an unexpected and fierce attack.  The answer is simply that they were members of the terrorist group Al-Qaeda and the U.S. government felt that they were too big of a threat to national security.  Many argue that such a decision is best left to the courts and should not be entertained by the executive branch.  They say that using drones is......

Words: 625 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Drones

...ANONYMOUS Professor Eidenmuller ENGL 103 28 April 2014 Drones: Beneficial to the United States Drones, also known as unmanned aerial vehicles, UAVs, are remotely piloted aircrafts used by both the military and law enforcement in the United States (“Drones” par.1). The benefits of drone usage includes tracking criminals, taking out terrorists, providing disaster relief, and saving lives. Drones are very versatile machines with many useful abilities that benefit the United States. Drones have been in development in the United States since World War I. Early drones were catapulted over destinations and then crash-landed to explode. Drones were expanded upon during World War II, however they were not much better than the older versions. They required a pilot who would parachute to safety once the drone was in position, then were remotely guided to their destinations and detonated (“Drones” par.5). A wide array of drones are used in the United States military. The size and purpose of modern military drones differ greatly. Some drones can be as small as a large breed dog and as be as large as a bus. Most of the smaller drones, like the RQ-7 Shadow for example, are used primarily for reconnaissance (Tirian 1). These smaller drones can be deployed by hand and are used to report enemy troop locations, track fleeing targets, and scout unknown terrain. As technology advances, the larger drones which include the Predator and Reaper have been enhanced with the ability o carry...

Words: 846 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Drone

...To Permanent Representatives of Member and Observer States of the UN Human Rights Council   Geneva, 17 September 2014   Your Excellencies,  The undersigned human rights and civil rights organizations write to share our concerns about state practices of targeted killings and the use of armed drones. We welcome the holding of a panel on the use of armed drones during the 27th session of the United Nations Human Rights Council and urge UN member states to support and take steps to monitor and promote meaningful transparency and legal compliance by states with regard to their targeted killing policies and practices. In particular, we call on states to publicly disclose their targeted killing standards and criteria; ensure that their use or facilitation of lethal force operations abroad comply with international law; enable meaningful oversight and remedies; and ensure effective investigations, tracking and response to civilian harm. Disclose legal standards and criteria. We are concerned about the lack of transparency in targeted killing operations. While many states affirmed their commitment to transparency at the UN General Assembly in 2013, some states have made only minimal progress in practice. Commitment to the rule of law requires that states disclose the legal constraints on their lethal targeting operations. Greater disclosure of legal and policy standards, and procedural mechanisms, is a prerequisite to informed assessment and debate. We believe this disclosure......

Words: 1165 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Outline

...Outline Structure I. Introduction A. Thesis: The use of drone strike’s is morally and ethically sound based on evidence that shows drone warfare saves American lives, are just as accurate as conventional air strikes, and save tax payers millions of dollars. II. Body Paragraph 1: The use of drone strikes has enabled the United States to neutralize thousands of terrorist targets without direct threat to American lives. B. Supporting evidence: 1. Explanation: You cannot put a dollar amount on a human life, however a U.S. military pilot has millions of dollars of training invested in them and the aircraft to make combat aviation safe. Look at the F-35 program for example it is highly experimental and has costed 1.5 Trillion Dollars. The most advanced drones such as the X-47B have only cost the United States 900 million dollars to develop and deploy due to the removal of the human element from flying the aircraft. 2. So what? If you look at all the aircraft crashes over the past decade they have killed 277 Americans. If you would have had drones in those combat areas versus manned aircraft those are 277 lives that could have been saved along with hundreds of millions of dollars in death benefits, lost training, and the cost of the aircraft. III. Body Paragraph 2: Topic sentence goes here. C. Supporting evidence 3. Explanation 4. So what? D. Supporting evidence 5. Explanation ...

Words: 780 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Us Drones

...one of the most technological advanced in the world. A controversial offensive strategy used by our military is to strike enemy target from the air using Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS’s). Formerly known as Unmanned Aircraft Vehicles (UAV’s), these highly advanced mechanized drones have been a controversial part of our military since they have been commissioned for use. From friendly fire, attacking civilians, and crossing into another countries airspace illegally these drones and their pilots have proved that this new technology must be carefully used with a level of expertise and caution, and abide to international aerospace, war and humanitarian laws worldwide. The new domestic controversial issue that deemed unethical by a majority of the U.S. population is using these UAS’s on U.S. soil, as they are co notated as a military surveillance weapon. The Federal Aviation Agency (FAA) has just permitted the use of these drone to civilian, government, and research agencies with strict guidelines however, the FAA is planning to opening the skies to public and private drones by 2015 and projecting that more than 30,000 UAS’s could be in flight nationwide by 2020. I feel that allowing and permitting the use of UAS’s in the United States without proper polices and strict laws in place are unethical. Specifically in California lawmakers are looking to attract the drone industry to the state by passing UAS friendly laws. This industry could bring $82 billion in to the states......

Words: 977 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Drones Technology

...Drones Technology: An Emerging Wireless Communication Trend at Workplace Allison Maestas BIS/221 March 14th, 2016 Lisa Ricks Introduction Emerging Technologies: Emerging technologies are type of new era technology which is currently developing or will be developed over next five to ten years. Emerging technologies have potential to alter business and social environment. These include IT, Wireless data communication, robotics, and bio-technologies. Drone is best example of emerging IT and wireless data transfer technology. It helps humans in many ways despite fact it has many drawbacks also. Drone technology is a type of emerging technology in which we feed commands in a flying object controlled by wireless controller. It helps us plenty of ways like Policing, delivery, entertainment, surveillance & surveying, agriculture, journalism, arts, firefighting, and nonmilitary security work (Byman, 2013). The reason for using these drones is that they are cheaper and more durable than helicopters due to their mechanical simplicity. Delivery drones are type of drones which is used to send medicines or other necessary stuff at faraway places where presence of human is hazardous for his life for example RQ-7 Shadow is capable of delivering a 20 lb (09.1 kg) “Quick MEDS” canister to front line troops. Professional Usage of Drone Technology at Workplace: The development of Unmanned Aerial Automobiles permitted the world to consider of innovative techniques to implement......

Words: 1156 - Pages: 5