Free Essay

Drug Courts: Juvenile and Adult

In: Social Issues

Submitted By xshagwagonx
Words 1367
Pages 6
Drug Courts: Adult and Juvenile Rehabilitation Programs
Eugene Berry
Crj2200
Introduction to Criminal Courts

Drug courts handle nonviolent substance abuse offenders, drug courts are used primarily to solve a problem rather than to send someone to jail or lock an offender away with less chance of rehabilitation. In the United States there are currently almost 2500 drug courts in the 50 states as well as the U.S. territories of Guam, and Puerto Ricco. Drug courts got their start in Florida, in 1989 judge Gerald Wetherington, Judge Herbert Klein, and state attorneys designed the court for non-violent offenders in Miami-Dade County, to battle a rising crack-cocaine problem in there city’s. Drug courts are a program the can involve different levels of intensive supervision by the courts themselves, this includes drug testing and substance abuse clinics or treatment programs. Drug court judges gain a lot of discretion and leeway in this system and can give the offenders instant or gradual sanctions if the offenders fail to meet the standards of the program given. To help keep the offenders compliant the courts can offer fewer drug tests, fewer court dates, and even the possibility of reduced or completely dismissed sentences if they programs are fully completed. Drug courts are proven to keep offenders from repeating their offences and the overall reduction in recidivism rates on these charges. There is research being done today that shows this treatment method could reduce drug related crimes even though it doesn’t show to reduce the demand for drugs in the country. These programs however when combined with treatment, can be a way to stop incarceration rates for low level, and non-violent repeaters from swelling up the jail population to its current all-time highs.
The US congress passed a grant program in support of the growing drug court system, these grants are handed out by the BJA and the DOJ. Congress budgeted 530million dollars in federal funds for drug court grants in since 1995. In 2010 alone congress gave the grants in total of 45 million dollars. Since these programs started sweeping the nation there are now new expanding programs to cover other types of abuse, with growth of over 466 juvenile drug courts specifically for those under the age of 18, as well as a growing number of DUI or DWI courts to help treat guilty plea offenders with over 166 active today. There are no actual national totals available at this time for total number of participants in these programs but the Urban Institute using a statistical model estimated that over 55000 offenders are treated each year, with an astounding 1.47 million people in total that are eligible to participate in these programs in the united states. Drug and DUI courts are one of the most effective strategies for curbing recidivism to date. There are many critics that say that these court programs do not really reduce recidivism any more than normal incarceration, parole or probation methods. On main issue with knowing for sure who is right is that the court systems do not normally track the abstinence of the offenders after the programs are complete, the only way to know if the offender failed to stay clean is if he gets caught again.
These court programs are evaluated by three different criteria. First is evaluating the overall operations, which track the number of participants, the number of offenders who complete the programs, and how many referrals to the programs are received from the court system. Second is the cost-savings compared to the conventional cost of arrest, incarceration, and any criminal victimization that occurs? They have to prove that there funding is cost effective compared to the normal process mentioned. The third criteria is the effectiveness of the programs on the lives of the offenders compared to the offenders who were not referred to these programs and were processed through the traditional systems. Research shows that many offenders to not respond to traditional incarceration and that more than half fail to drug test or comply with treatment conditions and rules of normal probation methods, and that the majority of these offenders return to drug use as soon as 6 months after release from jail. The Government Accountability Office used Meta analytical techniques to study the effectiveness of the drug court and dui court systems starting in 2005. The GAO reported that these programs did in fact lower recidivism rates at a noticeable and reportable level. They found out that the after program recidivism rates of the offenders continued to decline even after graduation of the programs. Four out of five of the programs that reported for the study had shown lower relapse rates than the traditional comparison groups studied the used incarceration and probation. The fifth study showed that there was no noticeable difference in the positive drug testing when compared but still shows that it was at least equal to traditional methods. Four of the GAOs study’s studied the cost effectiveness comparisons. Only one of the four study’s reported a benefit cost of about 800 – 8,500 dollars saved per offender. The three other studies showed a cost of 750 – 8500 dollar increase in spending per participant compared to conventional case processing. This direct cost comparison when compared shows no favor for the drug courts being a cost effective way to handle drug and dui offenders. The GAO realized they missed an important factor and calculated and reported the reduced costs of crime resulting from the recidivism reductions gained from the programs. The report showed that when added the programs saved in total 1000 to 15000 dollars per participant compared to traditional processing cost. So after all is totaled thanks to the reduced recidivism rates directly reducing the cost of crime, the programs are shown to be in favor over the traditional methods when it comes to financing and cost saving. Juvenile drug court programs came into place to try and push the success of the adult drug courts into the juvenile justice system. There are two main goals that are mentioned when these programs were launched. First is to provide “intensive and continuous judicial supervision over delinquency and status offence cases that involve substance abusing juveniles”. The second is to provide “coordinated and supervised delivery of an array of support services necessary to address the problems that contribute to juvenile involvement in the justice system”. The second goal is reached through services of mental health care, family care, and substance abuse treatment. In 2007 the center for Criminal Justice Research obtained a grant to fund a research study on the outcome and process evaluation of juvenile drug courts. Overall two of the nine courts scored as being effective, four scored low enough to need improvement, and three were claimed as ineffective. The referral agencies were scored as well and over 10 were found either highly effective or effective, and 12 were noted as needs improvement, and the last 13 were found ineffective. Juveniles were found to complete the drug court programs 1 percent less than traditional probation. When calculating the results for recidivism for drug and alcohol offenses the juveniles in the drug court programs had worse results when compared to youth attending standard probation after the program was finished. Follow up from both groups however tell us that drug courts had significantly lower chances of substance abuse in alcohol abuse specifically with a 8 percent less chance overall. For general drug use the drug court group was behind by almost 15 percent then standard probation methods. With only two of the drug courts giving evidence for better outcome with juvenile drug courts it’s apparent that the same techniques do not work remotely as well as with the adult drug court system.

References

Douglas B. Marlowe, David S. DeMatteo, and David S. Festinger, “A Sober Assessment of Drug Courts,” Federal Sentencing Reporter, vol. 16, no. 2, December 2003, p. 153.

Drug Courts. (n.d.). Retrieved May 20, 2015, from http://www.nij.gov/topics/courts/drug-courts/Pages/welcome.aspx
Latessa, E., Sullivan, C., Blair, L., Sullivan, C., & Smith, P. (2013). Final Report Outcome and Process Evaluation of Juvenile Drug Courts.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Juvinile Justice

...Criminal Justice Deborah Carr, J.D. Juvenile court is a specific court which deals with young adults who violate federal, state, and county laws. The court also addresses children and young adults who have been abused sexually, physically or emotional and mentally, dependent upon drugs or neglected.  Most juveniles will be seen in this court until the age of eighteen.  There is then an additional facility that may house young offenders from 18-25. If an offender needs further incarceration to finish their sentence then they will be sent to adult facility once they turn 25. In recent years however some crimes are so heinous that young adults have been tried as adults in adult court subject to those rules.  The definition of delinquency is the behavior of a person that is a violation of the law. It is a continued disobedient behavior that does not seem to be able to be corrected by community leaders, church or parents. The offender is then handed over to the juvenile courts for correction. Status offenses are based on behavior of status offenders. A status offender is the special category that encompasses a specific genre of offender. In this case it is based on children who violate laws specific to them such as truancy from school, running away from home and basic disrespect of parents and laws.       Some basic similarities exist in both courts. Both courts are there to punish the offender and protect the community.  Adult courts are based on an offender being a criminal...

Words: 1663 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Juvenile Court System

...Juvenile Court System Felicia Simmons CJS/200 10/13/2012 Monty H, Mathis M.Ed Juvenile Court The juvenile court system takes into different consideration when it comes to juveniles. They look at the age of the juvenile as well as the nature of the offense or crime that has been committed. Although the nature of the offense or crime will not ensure that the juvenile will be charged as an adult. In the juvenile court system when a minor commits a crime they are referred to as delinquent not criminals. Juveniles are not arrest they taken into custody and also in court a juvenile case can have adjustment made so that the minor may be sent home or placed in a detention facility, or a child care shelter. At this point the juvenile will be a findings hearing or adjudication hearing. If the juvenile is sentenced they can be sentenced from a range of different things such as commitment to a youth center, treatment, training schools. Before the juvenile is released they might be moved to a residential childcare facility or an aftercare facility. Adult Court System In the adult court system age isn’t a big factor at all, but the courts do look at pass offense as well as any other background or criminal history. Adults are refereed as criminal and they may chose to plead guilty, not guilty or no contest to any charges that they may be facing. An adult offender that is in the due process stage will either be sent to jail or they get a reduction in the charges that they have...

Words: 1112 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Juvenile Deliquency

...An Overview of Juvenile Delinquency in the United States 1. Introduction Juvenile delinquency regards crimes that are committed by individuals under the age of 18. Juveniles can be treated as adults depending on the nature of the crimes. Misdemeanors are minor crimes that don’t carry harsh penalties although felony related offenses do. Each state has juvenile courts that deal with juvenile delinquency. In 2010, there were a total of 308,745,538 juvenile delinquents living in the United States. This large has caused an increased concern about the number of youths that are committing crimes of all kinds. Major causes of juvenile delinquency are a lack of employment opportunities, little to no education and drug addiction among the parents. Juveniles that live with parents that have substance abuse problems often exhibit negative behaviors that result in crime. One program, “Beyond Scared Straight” has been highlighted in the media recently because it uses scare tactics to help juveniles avoid crime and the resulting jail time. This paper will provide an over of juvenile delinquency by defining it in terms of prevalence, causes and interventions. 2. Juvenile Delinquency Defined Each state in the United States have pre-established laws that define juveniles. Roberts concludes that individuals that have not turned 18 are juveniles in the eyes of the law. However, juveniles can be tried as adults if they commit serious crimes such as murder and robbery (Roberts). This has...

Words: 1655 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Juvenile Crime

...For those who come into the juvenile justice system, the answer may lie in their treatment. There are varieties of reasons why a child may become delinquent or commit a status offense. The juvenile justice system operates differently from adult courts because many times their offenses are different. While there are times when a juvenile will cross over and be tried as an adult, most will remain in the juvenile system. Categories The term delinquencies covers anytime a “juvenile’s actions or conduct is in violation of criminal law, juvenile status offenses, and other juvenile misbehavior” (Schmalleger, 2011, p. 543). Delinquent is one of the categories in the juvenile justice system. It applies if the child violates a law that would be considered to be a criminal offense if they were an adult. The category of undisciplined children covers children who are considered to be beyond their parent’s control. Children who fall into the category of dependent have no parents or guardians to care for them. Neglected children have parents or guardians who fail to provide proper supervision or care. Finally, there are abused children. These children may suffer physical, emotional, or sexual abuse at the hands of their parents or guardians. Status Offenders A status offense is “an act or conduct that is declared by statute to be an offense, but only when committed by or engaged in by a juvenile, and that can be adjudicated only by a juvenile court” (Schmalleger, 2011, p. 547)...

Words: 1135 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Juvenile Crime

...Juvenile delinquency has steadily increased over the years and does not look to be decreasing any time soon unless measures are taken. Juveniles are usually convicted and sentenced in juvenile court but some cases have also been tried in adult court. Status offenses are also controversial topics that need further research before any conclusions are drawn on them being an actual violation of the law. There are also a number of different variables and characteristics of each juvenile in detention, and these paint a broader picture of the environment and culture they come from. Juvenile delinquency is also known as juvenile offending or youth crime, which is the participation of juveniles in illegal behavior. A juvenile delinquent is usually a person under the age of 18 who commits an offense that would otherwise have been charged as a crime if they were an adult. It is also possible based upon the type and severity of the crime that an under-18 juvenile delinquent could be charged and tried as an adult. State policies vary as to the age at which a person legally becomes an adult, but if we refer to a juvenile as a person under the age of 18, the figures are shocking and disproportionate. The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), reports that nearly 16 percent of all violent crimes and 26 percent of all property crimes are committed by under 18 year olds. What is even more worrying is that this age group only makes up 26 percent of the total population...

Words: 1391 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Criminal Justice

...The juvenile court was created in the early 20th century when it was recognized that children and adults are different, and the rehabilitation process for them should be different as well. Until the late 19th century children and adults where tried alike in criminal courts. When a juvenile offender commits a crime it is the responsibility of the state to rehabilitate the juvenile offenders, as well as protect them. Youth crime rates have actually declined over the past twenty years, despite the public’s perception that it has increased. This has led to an overwhelming support that the juvenile court system be restructured to include tougher crime punishment, such as being able to try children as adults. This belief is that children are able to commit the same crimes as adults, and why should they be treated any different. Take for instance that if an adult commits a murder they will likely be in prison for the rest of their life, whereas a child or youth offender would likely be out by the time they are twenty one. Juvenile and criminal courts have many differences but the most outstanding is that juvenile courts tend to focus on the offender rather than the crime itself. Juvenile court is long believed to focus on the rehabilitation of the offender, as opposed to the focus of the crime as in criminal court. With rehabilitation in mind this gives the court much more leniency and flexibility, with options as far as punishment goes to the judge. The main concern in the public’s...

Words: 1130 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Juvenile Waiver

...|Trying Juveniles as Adults in Criminal Court: An Analysis of State Transfer Provisions Report, December 1998 Patrick Griffin Patricia Torbet Linda Szymanski National Center for Juvenile Justice Shay Bilchik, Administrator Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention [pic] Table of Contents Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Foreword Acknowledgments Introduction Transfer Provisions Waiver Direct File Statutory Exclusion Reverse Waiver Once an Adult/Always an Adult Additional Analyses Transfer for Nonviolent Offenses Additional Pretransfer Findings Required Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard Special Transfer Treatment Based on Prior Record Devices To Limit Prosecutorial Discretion Minimum Age Provisions Appendix: Summary of Transfer Laws Share With Your Colleagues Publications From OJJDP List of Tables Most States Have a Combination of Transfer Provisions Summary of Transfer Provisions, 1997 Discretionary Waiver: Minimum Age and Offense Criteria, 1997 Mandatory Waiver: Minimum Age and Offense Criteria, 1997 Presumptive Waiver: Minimum Age and Offense Criteria, 1997 Direct File: Minimum Age and Offense Criteria, 1997 Statutory Exclusion: Minimum Age and Offense Criteria, 1997 Minimum Age and Offenses for Which a Juvenile Can Be Transferred to Criminal Court in Every...

Words: 2470 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Juvenile Crime Paper Final Essay

...Juvenile Crime Jacqueline Allen CJS200 June 9, 2013 Charles Musselwhite Abstract Juvenile crime is a crime committed by minors (juveniles) younger than the statutory adult age. In most of the legal systems there are specific procedures followed when dealing with minor offenders, such as juvenile detention centers, boot camps, etc. This paper will attempt to create a better understanding of the offenses, the causes, and the procedures to deal with the criminal behavior of juveniles. In addition this paper will project ideas to reduce the criminal behavior of these minor’s through intervention and preventative measures. Juvenile Crime Each state has its own trenchant juvenile justice system with its own practices and laws. There are however broad underlying opinion that separates the juvenile justice system from the criminal justice system. The fundamental rationalization of the juvenile court system is that youth are developmentally different from adults and that they are susceptible of being lead or directed. Because of this pliant behavior the justice system feels that rehabilitation and treatment, with the addition of community protection are very feasible goals. In the adult court the defendant is provided greater Constitutional rights than are available in the juvenile court. An example of this is the criminal defendant has a right to a trial by a judge or a jury of their peers. A minor does not have that right; their fate is decided by a juvenile court...

Words: 1131 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Justice System Paper

...convince you through information and evidence my belief of what needs to happen in the juvenile justice system in order to make a difference in our children’s lives. My belief’s is that we need to make comprehensive plans for the juvenile offenders including both rehabilitation and punishment efforts. I do not believe rehabilitation nor punishment will work on their own and need to be used together to ensure the correct message is being sent to our youth. In my opinion there has to be education at a young age, rehabilitation and punishment in each individual’s plan. Juvenile Court Juvenile courts were first introduced into the United States court system in 1899. In 1899, the first juvenile court was finally established in Cook County, Illinois, and by 1925, all but two states had followed (Center On Juvenile & Criminal Justice, n.d.). The main purpose of juvenile courts was to make sure that adolescents were not treated and punished like adults and rehabilitation was thought to be the main way helping the youth. Why is juvenile court so important? The juvenile court system is very important to the youth of our country. This court not only ensures there will be consequences for illegal activity done by minors, but also helps to protect adolescents from being treated like adults. These courts take into consideration that minors do not have the same thought processes that adults do, and is able to take other factors such as their living environment, mental state,...

Words: 1811 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Juvenile Crime

...Juvenile Crime Tracey B. Freeman CJS 200 February 15, 2015 Jeffery Beasley Juvenile Crime The court system is very important and plays a role in how safe our community, state, and country can be. There are different and specials courts but the ones that are mainly divided would have to be juvenile and adult courts. Juvenile courts and adult courts have similarities, but they also have many differences. Although they both have the same principle, they both use different terminology, options, and reserve different constitutional rights. The court system will always treat minors and adults differently and because of this, teenagers or adolescents are offered more of a chance to turn their lives around before they turn down the wrong path too significantly to retract, gain more responsibility (some may have fines to pay that only they are allowed to pay if judge/probation officer demands), and depending on how bad of the situation, they will receive a dose of reality. Juvenile court is made up of three different cases: delinquency, dependency, and status offenses. For delinquency cases, the adolescent who has committed the crime would have been tried as an adult, however since they are a minor, they would use procedures of significant difference. According to Juvenile Justice (2015), since 2005 the U.S. Supreme Court has limited practices such as the execution of offenders who are under the age of 18 when their crimes were committed and life without parole...

Words: 1222 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Juvenile Crime Issues

...Juvenile Crime Issues CJS 200 February 12, 2012 Juvenile Crime Issues Children and young adults today are exposed to media shows and movies that affect them. Many have broken homes, face poverty and have other problems in school that affect them and can cause them to do wrong things. The arrest rates for juvenile males are 70%, and 30% for females. Anyone under the age of 18 is considered a juvenile. There are six categories of children in the juvenile justice system. The delinquent children are those who violate the criminal law. The undisciplined children are beyond parental control. The dependent children have no parents or guardians. The neglected children are those who do not receive proper care from parents or guardians. The abused children are those who suffer abuse at the hands of their parents or guardians (Criminal Justice Today, p.547). The status offender is a special category that embraces children who violate laws written only for them and they need supervision. This includes truancy, vagrancy, running away from home and incorrigibility. (Schmalleger, p. 547) Eight states have set a minimum age at which they are considered delinquent. Eight of them have the age as 10, Arizona s age is 8, three states is 7, and North Carolina has set the age as 6 to be delinquent(Fonseca, Associated Press, December 13, 2008, Used permission copyright laws) The officers today read their Miranda rights to juveniles before they ask any questions According to our...

Words: 1120 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Juvenile Crime

...Juvenile Delinquency and Juvenile Crime Name Class Date Instructor Juvenile Delinquency and Juvenile Crime Have you ever wondered how juvenile and adult courts operate? How they are similar but yet how they’re so different from each other? This is a very misunderstood topic and process. We will try to shed light on some of the situations that surround these types of courts, and help provide a clearer picture to help understand exactly what happens and what’s going on inside the two. Juvenile and Adult Courts Before we go into how juvenile and adult courts compare to each other we will first look at a few terms that are often misconstrued. The act or behavior of someone that is young often seen as illegal or going against laws are known as a delinquency. The second term we should get familiar with when talking about juveniles are status offenses. Status offenses for juveniles are actions that wouldn’t be considered illegal if they were of age. Prime examples being running away from home and underage drinking, things of that nature. So what exactly is the difference between juvenile court and adult court one might ask? Or how are they similar? Well we will discuss that now and try to get a clearer picture of these two questions. Juvenile courts are of course for people that are under the age of 18, and have committed some sort of act or acts that are considered to be against the law. Even though some people may be a juvenile they could still be put on trial in...

Words: 780 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Drug Courts

...first Drug Court in the United States was established in Miami- Dade County, Florida in 1989 as a response to the growing crack-cocaine problem affecting the city. Chief Judge Gerald Wetherington, Judge Herbert Klein, then State Attorney Janet Reno and Public Defender Bennett Brummer designed the court for nonviolent offenders to receive treatment. A Drug Court is a specialty court that manages drug abuse cases through comprehensive supervision, drug testing and treatment. Incarceration is an appropriate resolution for some people, but for many, society is better served by addressing the underlying causes of a person’s addiction. Montgomery County Circuit Court offers two drug court programs, one for adults and one for juveniles. Both are comprehensive treatment programs for adults and youth offenders who have serious drug/alcohol dependency problems. The drug treatment court was established in October, 2003persuant to the order of Chief Judge Robert M. Bell of the Maryland Court Appeals. The drug court was developed because of high rates of re-arrest, fragmented approaches to treatment, a focus on punishment rather than rehabilitation. The Montgomery County Circuit Court Adult Court Program is a voluntary program that offers offenders with drug/alcohol-dependency problems a new opportunity to break the chain of the cycle of drug/alcohol addiction and crime through intensive treatment and, monitoring and direct attention from the court. The purpose of the Adult Drug Court Program...

Words: 960 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Treating Juveniles as Adults

... I believe treating juveniles as adults is a good law to ensure that they can go to jail and receive time for a crime they committed. I think no matter what age a person is they should learn a lesson by doing their punishment or do hour services for the community. If a child that can pick up a dangerous weapon and harm an innocent person they knows what is right or wrong. They know that they can get in trouble for it. They should expect the consequences are going to be giving to them. My offer, point of view to prevent things like this is that children and adults should take delinquency programs. They can get counseling, get other services where they can get help to get their life straighten out, and prevent them from getting in trouble in the future. During the 1990s, nearly every state passed more punitive justice laws making it easier to try juveniles in adult court. More and more teens are doing time alongside adults in prison. This represents society’s recent shift towards taking a harsher view of adolescent’s culpability. When a juvenile is charge with certain felony offenses, his or her case may be transferred to the adult criminal division where a juvenile will be prosecuted in the same way as adults charge with laws violations. When a child is found guilty or pleads guilty in adult court and is sentenced as an adult, that child is forever considered an adult for the future violations of state law. In some cases, minors can be tried as adults. There three strikes...

Words: 1165 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Juvenile and Adult Courts: a Comparative Analysis

...Juvenile and Adult Courts: A Comparative Analysis Introduction Juvenile and adult courts have different language barriers that separate the two. Juvenile courts tend to use words such as detention hearing, petition, and adjudication to make things seem less harsh. Adult courts use words such as bail hearing, complaint or indictment, and the verdict. Adult courts deal with a stricter sentencing than juvenile courts do. Juvenile courts take the approach of a more controlled approach. Adults are taught to live a healthy and productive life, unlike minors. Juveniles have been reinstated so that they can be released back into society with a fresh start. The languages for juvenile courts are different than that of adult courts. Here are the different languages that separate juvenile courts from adult courts: Adult Courts • Bail Hearing • Trial • Complaint or Indictment • Defendant • Verdict • Guilty Juvenile Courts • Detention hearing • Fact-Finding Hearing • Petition • Respondent • Adjudication • Delinquent or Involved In juvenile courts they don't get a jury; instead the judge is the only person who determines if a minor has broken the law and what his or her punishment will be. The courtroom is closed to the media as well as to the general public. Juveniles are more prone to probation for longer times than adults. (#2)A juvenile's conditions of them being on probation tend to be obnoxious, including having a curfew, getting adequate grades...

Words: 1478 - Pages: 6