Free Essay

Eeoc - Law 610

In: Social Issues

Submitted By heidybejarano
Words 1287
Pages 6
The United States of America has long been known as the land of opportunity. America is a country where immigrants from other lands could go to begin a new life, and change their family legacy. Not only is America a land of opportunity for immigrants, but there is opportunity for anyone inside its borders who are dedicated and are willing to work hard to not only make a living, but change the direction of their life and the lives of their descendants for the better. But, opportunities here are not limited to people with an idea or an entrepreneurial spirit. You can take advantage of America’s offerings by simply being a hard worker, or be bettering yourself through education and vocational training to help yourself gain the job of your dreams. America is one of the richest economies in the world and truly is the land of opportunity for all. Or, is it?

Not only is America referred to as the land of opportunity, she is also referred to as a melting pot. America is a country of immigrants. Native Americans are but a fraction of our overall population. The population and workforce of the United States has roots in many foreign countries. In a typical company it is not unusual to sit in a meeting and see three or four different ethnicities represented at the table. Further, there is a wide range of age and a fairly equal balance of gender. Having such a diverse workforce was part of the vision the lead to Title VII of the Civil Rights act in 1964 that led to the formation of the EEOC in 1965. The need for change and Title VII was clear. According to the Bureau of Labor and Statistics Women made up just 29.6% of the workforce in 1950 compared to 47.9% in the year 2010. That represents a 18.3% jump in female participation in the workforce. In addition, women who were in the work force during the 1950-1960 time frame earned between 59-64 cents on the dollar versus their male counterparts. In 1980 Caucasians made up 87.5% of the workforce. In 2010 that number dropped to 81.2%. These statistics show a skew in the workforce that leans to white male workers being preferred over all other demographics. The time had come for an agency to assist in attaining diversity within the workforce.

Sadly while the creation of the EEOC has helped create much needed diversity in the workforce, not all businesses are covered be the laws and regulations that the EEOC investigates and administers. Companies with fewer than 15 employees are not covered by many of the regulations that the EEOC oversees. This creates situations where small businesses can use less than ethical guidelines when it comes to hiring prospective candidates and promoting employees in to higher level positions. The only regulation that covers every single business regardless of size is that of equal pay. While this regulation is important there are many other discrimination classes that can be just as important and affect workers in just as profound a way.

So, one may ask why are small businesses with fewer than fifteen employees exempt from such laws as age discrimination which has a cut off of twenty employees. Pregnancy discrimination which has a cut off of fifteen years, Disabilities discrimination which has a cut off of fifteen years and others. Do people that want to work for a smaller business deserve any less protection?

According to the Small Business and Entrepreneurship Council in 2011 there were 5.98 Million employer firms in the U.S. 99.7% of those firms had 500 workers or less and a staggering 89.8% of the employee firms in the U.S. had less than twenty employees. This is a huge number of firms that are not covered by EEOC rules. Statistics from SBA.GOV for the 2010-2011 period shows that of the 111,952,223 workers employed that 20,562,300 were employed by firms with fewer than twenty employees. That is a startling number of employees that are not protected by the EEOC. Why would our government create what appears to be a great idea only to cripple it by not covering over 18% of the workforce?

I think we can begin to understand why by simply looking at the simple fact that the company is quite small. With a small company you don’t have a lot of capital or revenue to work with. According to Entrepreneur.com 28% of small businesses have revenue of less than $100,000 and over 50% less than $500,000. If we look at the ADA portion of EEOC coverage we quickly conclude that small businesses in this category simply cannot afford to build facilities to accommodate disabled. Simply installing an ADA ramp could very well cost the company more than its annual revenue.

In some cases of businesses with less than 15-20 employees there may often be need for an employee to do some task or job that is well outside of their job description. Maybe there are instances where an associate in a sales position may be called upon to provide some physical form of labor. In this example say that a prospective employer is looking at two candidates, both are accomplished sales associates. One of them may be in his sixties while the other is in their thirties. If this company is a startup company this sales associate very well could be asked to stand in and build product one day, or perhaps do some other task vital to the survival of the business. In this case the owner may very well select the younger worker because he may be more versatile over the older worker. Same situation may apply to a man over a woman in this case. We can look at several examples as to why businesses with less than 15-20 people may stretch the rules of hiring and promotion. But what about the EEOC? Why would they choose to only represent companies with more than 15 employers when they already have at least one rule in place that covers everyone which is the equal compensation rule?

The EEOC has statistical surveys that must be complete by in scope companies such as the EEO-1 survey that collects gender and ethnicity information. At present this survey is required by businesses with more than 100 employees. If they were to include all employers that would increase the number of reports they have to collect by over 450%. Also, the EEOC provides, free of charge to the companies, representatives to provide any necessary information and training needed to comply with equal opportunity regulations. Once again, can the EEOC handle a 450% increase in load when it comes to provided firms with training and representatives? The idea of an EEOC is one that has helped any employee who is not Caucasian and male gain a level playing field in the work force. However, there is certainly a hole in coverage by the EEOC. Not being able to cover every single business regardless of employee count with oversight could very well derail some prospective employee’s dream of the American way. It could also cost a short sighted company talent they may have not otherwise considered due to archaic ideas on whom the ideal employee would be. Perhaps one day, maybe through the use of technology or some other means, we will be able to ensure fair labor practices in all sizes of companies. It would be a shame if the land of opportunity began to lose her title of the place to be to chase your dream.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Eeoc Impact on Small Businesses

...EEOC Impact on Small Businesses Southern New Hampshire University MBA 610 Business Law Unit 2-3 Short Paper Dr. Sheed W. Dahar II By Thomas W. Scalf   EEOC Impact on Small Businesses Lawmakers realized a need for laws specifically designed to protect American workers. Over the years numerous laws and acts have been enacted to protect the Civil Rights of employees. The passage of these laws warranted the creation of an agency to regulate and enforce these laws. The Equal Employment Commission was established and tasked with the compliance monitoring and enforcement of these laws. However several areas of these laws created hardships on small businesses, which required the EEOC to treat small businesses differently than their larger counterparts. The small business fact sheet outlines the federal laws that are enforced by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). The employment laws that fall under the EEOC jurisdiction would include: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Age Discrimination, Equal Pay, Americans Disability Act Titles I and IV (Small Business Fact Sheet, 2015). These laws protects American workers from being discriminated against on the basis of race, religion, age, sex, or nationality. Policy makers realized the extensive cost to businesses to be compliant with the EEOC laws would greatly hamper the sustainability and growth of small businesses. Also knowing that small businesses make up almost half of the economic landscape and......

Words: 720 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Donate

...James Jenkins MBA-610-Q5442 Business Law July 25, 2015 While reviewing the U.S. Equal Opportunity Commission’s website, a broad principle quickly become clear. The laws governing businesses of different sizes can greatly vary due to the potential impact that laws can have on smaller businesses. The EEOC defines a small business as one that has 500 or less employees. However, the resources of a company with 400 employees has access to can greatly differ from a company that has ten. The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) allows agencies to potentially scale back certain regulatory rules in certain situations to protect small businesses from being devastated by laws that large businesses would have to abide by. According to the EEOC website, the RFA “requires agencies to consider the impact of their rules on small entities and to evaluate alternatives that would accomplish the objectives of the rule without unduly burdening small entities when the rules impose a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Inherent in the RFA is Congress' desire to remove barriers to competition and encourage agencies to consider ways of tailoring regulations to the size of the regulated entities.” What this basically means is that agencies can tailor their rules regarding equal opportunity employment so that the laws governing will not economically cripple a small business. In cases like these, the RFA comes into play. According to the EEOC, only......

Words: 753 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Small Business

... ASARE, NANA 19 JUL 2015 MBA 610 There are three types of small entities. • "Small businesses" are defined in section 3 of the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. . 632, and in the SBA's regulations at 13 C.F.R. . 121.201 (2002). 5 U.S.C. . 601(3). • "Small organizations" are any not-for-profit enterprises that are independently owned and operated and not dominant in their fields (for example, private hospitals and educational institutions). 5 U.S.C. . 601(4). • "Small governmental jurisdictions" are governments of cities, counties, towns, townships, villages, school districts, or special districts with a population of less than 50,000. The size standard used by the Small Business Administration to define small businesses varies by industry; however, the SBA uses the "fewer than 500 employees" cut off when making an across-the-board classification. (A large percentage of small entities are not covered by EEOC laws, because they employ fewer than 15 employees.) If EEOC wishes to use a different definition for any of these types of small entities for purposes of an RFA analysis, it must consult with the Office of Advocacy at the SBA, publish the alternative definition for comment and publish the final definition in the Federal Register. If EEOC seeks to change the definition of small business in a general rulemaking context, it should contact the Administrator of the SBA. In accessing the Equal Employment Opportunity Office (EEOC) website, I found it very hard to......

Words: 1424 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Constructive Discharge

...A former employee of our company has filed a claim with the EEOC that the company discriminated against him and due to this discrimination; the employee was forced to resign due to constructive discharge. The claim states that the constructive discharge violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The former employee alleges that the constructive discharge was in correlation with religious discrimination based on a work schedule policy change. The former employee states that the change in the work schedule policy was discriminatory, because it required employees to work on a religious holy day and due to this change the employee was forced to quit. Constructive discharge in employment law is typically when working conditions are so intolerable that the employee feels compelled to resign (Constructive Discharge, n.d.). Constructive discharge is a discriminatory practice that forces an employee to resign due to perceived intolerability in the work environment. Courts will typically agree with the claim of constructive discharge, if the court determines that any reasonable employee in a similar situation would also feel discriminated against if in the former employee’s position (Ford, Notestine, & Hill, 2000). Courts also require that an employee show that the working condition was so intolerable and that the employer made it purposely so, it forced the employee to resign (Ford, Notestine, & Hill, 2000). The burden of proof is placed on the former employee...

Words: 1960 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Title Vii

...our growth. Not doing so would result to catastrophic financial losses because of lost opportunities. In Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Townley Engineering & Manufacturing (1988) the Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit granted EEOC’s motion for summary judgment on 2 issues regarding religious service attendance of employees, but denied summary judgment on the constructive discharge issue on behalf of a former employee, Pelvas. Townley Engineering and Manufacturing, as a company borne out of faith in God, requires its employees to attend religious services and they are aware of the requirements by the time they get hired. The former employee, Pelvas, complained to the EEOC that the mandatory services are in conflict with his beliefs. One of the defenses that Townley used was the “undue hardship” if they accommodate religious beliefs of Pelvas, which would excuse him from attending the religious services. Townley lost in this argument because the court did not see undue hardship happening for the company if they not allow Pelvas to attend the services. For our situation, we can win in this case because our claim of undue hardship is valid, unlike the Townley’s. We needed this shift change because of business necessity. Not doing so would cause us undue hardship.   Our workplace environment or the shift change itself is not abusive or hostile as to compel a person with similar beliefs to our......

Words: 1465 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Wgu Jdt Task 1

...threat of discharge or discipline on part of the company. The schedule change was for all employees and not just the former employee. And the company was never informed by the former employee of the religious belief that is genuine and sincere that was in conflict with the new duties. This shows that the former employee cannot prove the 2nd prima facie either. The former employee may be able to prove the 1st prima facie but that will be the only one. The company can show to the courts that the accommodation of such a religious practice would result in undue hardship for the company. The shift change is being made due to the growth of the company. Not doing this will result in significant financial losses due to lost opportunities. In EEOC v, Townley Engineering and Manufacturing (1988) the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals granted the EEOC’s motion for summary judgment on 2 issues regarding religious service attendance of employees. But they denied summary judgment on constructive discharge on behalf of a former employee. Townley Engineering and Manufacturing is a company borne out of faith and required its employees to attend religious services. All employees are made fully aware of this requirement at their time of hire. The former employee made a complaint that this requirement was a conflict with his own religious beliefs. Undue hardship was one of the defenses Townley used. The courts did not see excusing the former employee from attending the mandatory services as......

Words: 1340 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Human Resources Task 1

...incorporate the evidence that the former employee had shown a genuine religious belief that interfered with their job responsibilities. Secondly, the former disgruntled employee must have notified their employer of their religious beliefs prior to the allegation, and finally he will need to prove that the employer terminated or sought discipline from him for failing to comply with the conflicting employment requirement (Tepper v Potter, F.3d, 6th Circuit Ohio, 2007). According to the indebt research, and analysis I have made the constructive discharge claim was absent during his employment, and therefore I personally recommend that ABC Toy’s take this to litigation. B. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. There is a commission called EEOC (Federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission), which has a provision under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in regards to accommodating all religions in the workplace and states; “ the employer is required to reasonably accommodate the religious beliefs of an employee, or prospective employee, unless doing so would impose on undue hardship”. With ABC Toy’s situation, the disgruntled past employee alleged that the newly structured schedule change would force him to be present at work on multiple religious days, and would not be the same schedule it was when he first started as an employee only working Monday-Friday. After researching section 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 I found that it......

Words: 2649 - Pages: 11

Free Essay

Case

...was not protected against retaliation because the investigation was an employer's internal investigation and a charge had not been filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Crawford only filed with the EEOC after she had been terminated, as required by Title VII. Crawford appealed to the Supreme Court, who heard the case on October 8, 2008. The court ruled unanimously in her favor on January 26, 2009. ------------------------------------------------- Decision Writing for the majority, Justice Souter defines two activities Title VII protects, saying section 704(a) "makes it unlawful 'for an employer to discriminate against any... employe[e]' who (1) 'has opposed any practice made an unlawful employment practice by this subchapter' (opposition clause), or (2) 'has made a charge, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under this subchapter' (participation clause)." The Sixth Circuit held, when it heard the case, that the opposition clause demanded "active, consistent" opposing, which it did not find Crawford had done, as she did not initiate her own complaint before to the investigation. It also held that since the internal investigation was not conducted pursuant to a charge pending with the EEOC, Crawford was not protected by the participation clause. The court found that "oppose" is not defined by the statute, so a normal definition of it may be used, per Perrin v. United States. "Thus, a person can......

Words: 4929 - Pages: 20

Free Essay

Ban the Box: Employment Discrimination and the Ex - Offender

...(Apr. 25, 2012), http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/arrest_conviction.cfm. (this document looks to guide employer actions in regards to use of convictions and arrests in employment decisions under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e) 2 Jeanna Smialek, Putting Released Prisoners Back to Work, BLOOMBERG BUSINESS WEEK. (Feb. 6, 2014), http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-02-06/companies-rethink-ex-con-hiringpolicies. See Data Bureau of Justice Statistics (428,300 in 1992 to 637,411inmates released from state and federal prisons) 2 offenders are African-American or Hispanic seemingly excludes these populations from the work place as they carry both stigmas of a criminal record and minority status.3 While extensive research shows that a criminal conviction coupled with incarceration lowers employability, the findings neglect to place appropriate responsibility on the decreased employment prospects available. 4 Unfortunately, employers show a tendency to prefer individuals who have no criminal record without allowing those who do, a chance beyond the initial application. Screening processes include applications that question whether or not the candidate has ever been charged or convicted of misdemeanors or felonies – each application is tailored specifically to employer preference. Recently, several employers have faced legal ramifications for their employment practices. In 2013, EEOC filed suit against two major......

Words: 14524 - Pages: 59

Premium Essay

Instructions

...DMBA 610 Knowledge Integration Exam Fall 2015 ________________________________________Please read all instructions carefully before you begin. 1) Use the provided Student Exam Answer Sheet. Include your responses to all questions in the column, “Your Response” next to the appropriate question. This ONE Exam Answer Sheet document should be saved with your last name and "final," -- e.g. "Smithfinal"-- and posted in your Assignment Folder no later than 11:59 PM (EST), Sunday, November 15th, 2015. This exam also must be submitted to Turnitin.com It is recommended that you submit your exam to Turnitin.com at least 24 hours before the deadline to allow you sufficient time to address any issues identified in the Originality Report prior to posting your exam in your Assignment Folder. Please note: The exam questions are already included on the Answer Sheet. If the exam content is recognized as non-original by Turnitin, it will be ignored in analyzing your Turnitin report. Do not include any repeat of the exam case content on your Answer Sheet. Only place your answers and references on the Answer Sheet. 2) No extensions may be granted on this assignment; be sure to submit it on time and check to make sure that the document you submitted is readable and what you intended to submit. NOTE: This is an individual assignment. Any discussion or collaboration regarding the assignment constitutes a violation of UMUC's Academic Dishonesty and Plagiarism Policy. If you have any...

Words: 8490 - Pages: 34

Premium Essay

Management

...CASE: JACK NELSON'S PROBLEM 26 CONTINUING CASE: CARTER CLEANING COMPANY 26 KEY TERMS 27 ENDNOTES 27 Equal Opportunity and the Law 30 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY 1964-1991 32 \ i i | j j i ! | Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act 32 Executive Orders 32 Equal Pay Act of 1963 33 Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 33 Vocational Rehabilitation Act of 1973 33 Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 34 . Federal Agency Guidelines 34 Early Court Decisions Regarding Equal Employment Opportunity 34 EQUAL E M P L O Y M E N T O P P O R T U N I T Y 1990-91-PRESENT 35 The Civil Rights Act of 1991 35 The Americans with Disabilities Act 36 Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA) 39 State and Local Equal Employment Opportunity Laws 39 Sexual Harassment 39 • MANAGING THE N E W WORKFORCE: Enforcing Equal Employment Laws with International Employees 45 I j ! '• ; DEFENSES AGAINST DISCRIMINATION ALLEGATIONS The Central Role of Adverse Impact 46 Bona Fide Occupational Qualification 48 Business Necessity 49 Other Considerations in Discriminatory Practice Defenses 46 : 50 ILLUSTRATIVE DISCRIMINATORY EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES A Note on What You Can and Cannot Do 50 Recruitment 50 Selection Standards 51 Sample Discriminatory Promotion, Transfer, and Layoff Practices What the Supervisor Should Keep in Mind 52 50 52 THE EEOC ENFORCEMENT PROCESS 53 55 ; Voluntary Mediation 54 Mandatory Arbitration of Discrimination Claims DIVERSITY MANAGEMENT......

Words: 4865 - Pages: 20

Premium Essay

Yeasy Fermentation

...of harassing behaviors they report, and whether they subjectively interpret their experiences as harassment. After establishing basic empirical relations using survey data, we analyze qualitative interviews with YDS respondents to delineate and explain the processes underlying these relationships. We then situate both sets of results within theories of gender and power and extant research on sexual harassment. Gender, Sexual Harassment, And Workplace Power Sexual harassment is classified as a form of sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) defines it as “unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature” that interferes with one’s employment or work performance or creates a “hostile or offensive work environment” (U.S. EEOC 2011). Due, in part, to varying definitions and indicators, prevalence estimates vary dramatically (Welsh 1999), leading many researchers to adopt a strategy of triangulation that considers multiple forms or measures (e.g., Houston and Hwang 1996; Uggen and Blackstone 2004). Feminist scholarship situates sexual harassment within broader patterns of discrimination, power, and privilege, linking harassment to sex-based inequality (MacKinnon 1979). Quinn’s (2002) research on “girl watching,” for example, ties patriarchal gender relations to everyday workplace interactions. Quinn argues that other men, rather than......

Words: 13434 - Pages: 54

Premium Essay

History 990

...Policies and Services document under Student Course Guide for any further University policies. COURSE DESCRIPTION Examines the legal environment of business, the sources of American law, and the basis of authority for government to regulate business. Provides a survey of tort law, contracts and the UCC, and the federal and state courts. COURSE DESCRIPTION Examines and evaluates the legal environment and ethical challenges of management and organizations. Reviews approaches to enhance corporate accountability, foster an ethical work environment, ensure legal compliance, and provide effective leadership in an organization. Analyzes the impact of management decisions, corporate governance, and the leader’s individual conduct on a firm’s ability to meet its obligations to stakeholders. Evaluates alternative courses of action from an economic, legal, and ethical perspective to ensure management meets corporate responsibilities to create wealth, obey the law, and observe society’s ethical standards. Examines the key elements of effective corporate governance, the predominate schools of ethical thought in relation to strategic management, and the ethical consideration for global operations. INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS Required Resources Halbert, T., & Ingulli, E. (2012). Law & ethics in the business environment (7th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning. Prentice, R. A., & Bredeson, D. (2010). Student guide to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (2nd ed.).......

Words: 8728 - Pages: 35

Premium Essay

Business Environment

...planning and analysis activities have several facets. Through HR planning, managers attempt to anticipate forces that will influence the future supply of and demand for employees. Having adequate human resource information systems (HRIS) to provide accurate and timely information for HR planning is crucial. The importance of human resources in organizational competitiveness must be addressed as well. As part of maintaining organizational competitiveness, HR analysis and assessment of HR effectiveness must occur. The internationalization of organizations has resulted in greater emphasis on global HR management. These topics are examined in Chapters 2, 3, and 4. Equal Employment Opportunity Compliance with equal employment opportunity (EEO) laws and regulations affects all other HR activities and is integral to HR management. For instance, strategic HR plans must ensure sufficient availability of a diversity of individuals to meet affirmative action requirements. In addition, when recruiting, selecting, and training individuals, all managers must be aware of EEO requirements. The nature of EEO compliance is discussed in Chapters 5 and 6. Staffing The aim of staffing is to provide an adequate supply of qualified individuals to fill the jobs in an organization. By studying what workers do, job analysis is the foundation for the staffing function. From this, job descriptions and job specifications can be prepared to recruit applicants for job openings. The selection......

Words: 292066 - Pages: 1169

Premium Essay

Human Resource Planning

...planning and analysis activities have several facets. Through HR planning, managers attempt to anticipate forces that will influence the future supply of and demand for employees. Having adequate human resource information systems (HRIS) to provide accurate and timely information for HR planning is crucial. The importance of human resources in organizational competitiveness must be addressed as well. As part of maintaining organizational competitiveness, HR analysis and assessment of HR effectiveness must occur. The internationalization of organizations has resulted in greater emphasis on global HR management. These topics are examined in Chapters 2, 3, and 4. Equal Employment Opportunity Compliance with equal employment opportunity (EEO) laws and regulations affects all other HR activities and is integral to HR management. For instance, strategic HR plans must ensure sufficient availability of a diversity of individuals to meet affirmative action requirements. In addition, when recruiting, selecting, and training individuals, all managers must be aware of EEO requirements. The nature of EEO compliance is discussed in Chapters 5 and 6. Staffing The aim of staffing is to provide an adequate supply of qualified individuals to fill the jobs in an organization. By studying what workers do, job analysis is the foundation for the staffing function. From this, job descriptions and job specifications can be prepared to recruit applicants for job openings. The selection......

Words: 292066 - Pages: 1169