Free Essay

Efficient Market Hypothesis

In: Business and Management

Submitted By F183F183F
Words 3508
Pages 15
Introduction

Efficient market hypothesis is widely accepted by academic community as a cornerstone of modern financial theory. Fama (1970) gives detailed definition of this theory and states that efficient market is a market that stock prices quickly and fully reflect all available and newly released information, where majority of participants are rational in their decision making process and where an investor is not able to outperform the market through any analyses, because of actual price of stock shows its intrinsic value. Naturally such revolutionary hypothesis did not occur suddenly. In 1990 Louis Bachelier in his "Theory of Speculation" paragraph gave definition of informational efficiency of the market. This study was not being developed until 1953 when Maurice Kendall who postulated that stock prices movement follow the random walk theory. Further enhancement of these studies associated with the name of Eugene Fama who gave comprehensive resume of efficient market hypothesis, as well as empirical evidences to support it and defined three form of efficient market: weak, semi-strong and strong in 1970 (Dimson and Mussavian, 1998). Later several different researches have been carried out by financial academics which continuously underpinned efficient market hypothesis. Consequently this theory began widely use by investors for investment decision making process. However only after two decades this hypothesis began less dominance in the market. Several crashes, changing economical situations revealed salient controversial criticisms of this hypothesis. Instead of testing limitations of three form of efficient market, the paper critically reviews major assumptions of this hypothesis. Because of instable nature of market, constantly changing conjuncture does not allow to accurately identify weather market experiences weak, semi-strong or strong form of efficiency. This paper has been divided into four sections. The first section of the paper will examine informational efficiency of market with the help of post-announcement drift study and newly released information publication research. The second section will describe if it is possible to predict stock prices movement and get excessive return through technical and fundamental analyses. The third section will discuss dominance of behavioural finance theory over efficient market hypothesis. The last section will investigate small firm effect over the market as one of the obvious argument against efficient market theory.

Informational Inefficiency. Although efficient market hypothesis is considered being is the very important theory for making corporate investment decisions it has major limitations that needs to be accounted for. Myriad researchers have been conducted by experts to reveal anomalies which associate with this hypothesis. Yet, there are a lot of proponents which insistently deny any drawback of this concept.

One of the striking implication concerning to efficient market hypothesis is about informational efficiency. Fama (1970) states that all known public information quickly and incessantly expressed in the stock prices. Lots of analyses have been carried out by researchers about how quickly stock prices reflect to public announcements of stock splits, dividend changes, corporate mergers, and such kind of different strongly influential information. In most cases were found that stock prices instantly responded to new information (Lynn A. Stout, 2003).

However, there are limits to how far the informational efficiency can be taken. Gilson and Kraakman (1984) exploration on this issue revealed that information is a costly resource. Another case is that obtaining certain kind of information, analyzing and understanding it is not as simple as it seen. Because it is known that market consists of different kinds of investors with different background knowledge on this inarticulate field. Exploration concludes that only small part of professional investors can acquire and correctly analyze existing information. In this case stock prices way of reflection of new information became different. Gilson and Kraakman (1984) conducted some research according to this issue and arrived at a result that very small well-informed part of professional market participants swift purchase of large quantity of stocks creates pressure on prices which make it increase. Consequently, this pressure drives less-informed part of investors act in the same way which in the result causes immediate movement of the stock prices.

On the other hand the case described above doesn't work without flawless. Because stock markets have a wide range of participants: from novice one to professional. Which means that not all of them competent or having enough knowledge to easily act in the agitated stock market. So what does it mean? Lynn A. Stout (2003) explains that it is very simple to interpret some kinds of information like dividend announcement, mergers, stock splits etc. But how about information that is very technical and complicated to interpret. In this case investigations revealed that stock prices gradually and imperfectly reflect this type of information, which in its turn gives opportunity to view market inefficiency. One comprehensive investigation according to delayed market responses to new information had been carried out by Bernard and Thomas (1989) and was about post-earnings-announcement-drift. It states that corporations positive or negative earning information is not correctly assess by investors. Therefore corporations experience abnormal positive or negative return over the subsequent months after announcement. Bernard and Thomas (1989) research encompasses period between1974-86 years and reveals noticeably abnormal positive/negative return appears in the first 60 days following to the earnings announcement. One issue also became clear from this research that post-announcement-drift changes depending upon firm size.

Another associated and noteworthy research related to the stock prices gradually and incomplete response to new information had been conducted by Chang and Suk (1998). Research shows that Securities Exchange Commission made section 16 filings accessible to all investors as soon as they got information from the insiders. The same information about after ten days was published in the Wall Street Journal's Insider Trading Spotlight column. Survey by Chang and Suk (1998) uncovered considerable price changes after publication of the same information in the Wall Street Journal. Which mean that only after ten days stock prices completely reflected new available information and displayed informational inefficiency of the securities market.

Returns unpredictability Inefficiency

Proponents of efficient market hypothesis enunciate that future movements of stock prices are unpredictable. Which display another one salient implication of hypothesis of efficient market. With the help of the random walk theory supporters of this concept try to explain that because of stock prices movement follow random path independently from its past price it is impossible to predict stock price's future direction. Additionally it is fruitless to use technical or fundamental analyses in order to predict future stock prices. However different kinds of studies which had been carried out on this issue revealed obvious results against market efficiency. Major accepted view by opponents of this hypothesis is that current price doesn't express true value of a stock. Some analyses need to carry out in order to find out its true value and profit from it. Bako and Sechel (2013) state that with the help of two analytical method - technical and fundamental - investors can predict future price movements of stocks and increase their earning yield. Also one issue need to be taken into account that speculative nature of the stock market makes investor's stock picking process complicated. That's why any investor has to make detailed technical and fundamental analyses before buying or selling stocks. Whereas Clarke and Gershon (2001) points out that conducting different analyses is a very costly process. So even though an investor who makes profit in this way has to reduce it’s profit by the amount of associated costs. As a result s/he will get trifling return. And of course if we consider the time consumed during this process, stress and nervousness related to analyzing data as a cost it becomes apparent that the whole process is worthless. But after getting depth into the process it displays different pattern and prove that it is inevitable and actual to conduct analyses. In this case technical and fundamental analyses will be analyzed separately. Generally technical analysis uses data which derives from the past performance of stock price in order to predict its future return. One of the detailed study according to technical analyses predictability of stock returns had been carried out in 1992 by Brock, Lakonishok and LeBaron. In the study it had been used only ordinary methods of technical analyses and considered transaction costs that are very small. One of the particular point of this study is that it analyzed 90 years daily data of Dow Jones Industrial Average from 1897 to 1986. Which in its turn shows that, how exploration widely conducted. Research shows that return signals getting from the Dow Jones data strongly support technical analyzes predictability of stock returns. In the same time with technical analyses fundamental analyses also have predictability power of stock returns which again opposed by efficient market hypothesis. Unlike technical analysis fundamental analysis uses not only past performance of the stock price but other several economic indicators of stocks and companies by analyzing it's financial statement, annual report and etc. in order to predict future stock price. One of the noteworthy investigation related to fundamental analyses predictability power associated with the name of Jeffrey and Brian (1998). Covering the results that encompass the period during 1974-1988 the study apparently shows that portfolio which was established based upon the fundamental signals yielded 13,2 percent abnormal return during 1974-1985 and displaying very slight negative return during 1986-88. Another proven research of predictability of fundamental analysis had been provided by Jane and Stephen (1989). Investigation captures sample of financial statement information of the firms during 1965-1984. It had been divided into two stages. In the first stage data estimation for 1973 to 1977 (the years of employing investment strategy)are used from 1965-1972. But in the second stage data estimation for 1978-1983 (the years of employing investment strategy) are used 1973-1977. The study demonstrates that thoroughly utilizing value-measures of financial statement with the help of the fundamental analysis enables easily discern some fundamentals which are not expressed in the stock price. Which in its turn means that the stock price undervalued. Hence, gaining abnormal returns in the future from these stocks are realizable.

Behavioural Finance versus Efficient Market Hypothesis

Escalating contradictions between these two theories have become much more intensive in recent years. Several strong investigations resulted in favour of the behavioural finance theory of explaining stock price movements. Therefore began to widely use by investors to accomplish investment strategies instead of efficient market hypothesis. What made behavioural finance theory draw such an excessive attention from investors? What are the advantages of behavioural finance/in other word what limitations of efficient market hypothesis made investors turn against it ? Being a fundamental theory of classical finance efficient market hypothesis states that all market participants are rational in their decision making process and assumes that existence of irrational participants does not impact effectiveness of market. Because quick movements of rational traders expel irrational investors from the market thus brings market to equilibrium (Stout, 2003). However, there is an inconsistency with this argument. Because during the several crashes this assumption failed to elucidate sharp up and downward trends in stocks prices. For instance, Malcolm and Jeffrey (2007) affirm that classical finance theory faced with considerable difficulty while trying to explain dramatic level of stock prices during the crashes which occurred in 1960, 1970, 1987 and 1990. The result is that not all investors in the market act logically and rationally. The reason is that especially psychological factors inherent to human nature impel investors to be irrational. Anastasios, et al. (2012) states that being a dominated theory for investing behavioural finance appeared to be not only a new model but also the one which disproved the financial theories that have prevailed in the market for a long time. Behavioural finance theory distinguishes two types of market participant: rational investors and noise traders. Rational investors always make logical investment decisions according to relevant information, while noise traders subject to investor sentiment and make irrational decisions in the market. Daniel, Hirshleifer, and Subrahmanyam (1998) enunciate that because of investor sentiment market participants tend to over react to unexpected and dramatic information and under react to announcement, so affecting stock prices. Several empirical evidences related to these issues strongly comply with it. De Bondt and Thaler (1985) painstakingly scrutinized overreaction phenomenon over stock prices and got significant results. The study included monthly return data from 1926 to 1982. According to some calculations of stocks it was formed winner and looser portfolio. After conducting some more assessments the study revealed stunning results. Loser portfolios got 19.6% abnormal positive return 36 months after the formation. However, winner portfolios got 5.0% abnormal negative return. Nicholas, Andrei and Robert (1998) explain that the reason of such anomaly is that stocks which experience poor performance in the past period tend to outperform the market in the long term while stocks which display superior performance in the past period tend to underperform the market in the following period. The outcomes of this investigation are widely comply with the overreaction phenomenon. Thus display sharp violation efficient market hypothesis. How about under reaction phenomenon? Do the findings validate it and display market inefficiency? A sufficient number of investigations carried out to answer this kind of questions. One of the praiseworthy research associates with the names of Louis, Narasimhan and Josef (1997). The study encompasses sample data from January 1977 to January 1993. Taken stocks then assigned to established portfolios which ranked from one to ten deciles. The established portfolios have been subjected to earning announcement of the firms. Result shows that high past return stocks and stocks which experienced positive earnings announcement tend to outperform the worst past performance stocks and stocks which experienced negative earnings announcement. The findings unearthed noticeable evidences consistent with under reaction of stock prices.

Small firm effect: next anomaly of efficient market hypothesis

As a so-called size effect in the market small firm effect is one of the particular irregularity of efficient market hypothesis. Lots of findings revealed that on a risk adjusted basis small firms tend to outperform large firms and yield excessive return. However, proponents of efficient market hypothesis want to explain that such occurrence associated with using inappropriate model of risk measurement. For instance, according to Malkiel (1987) it is very hard to assume that such abnormal behaviour is a sign of market inefficiency. It may be occurred due to inadequacies of capital asset pricing model used to measure risk. Keim (1983) support this point by emphasizing that efficient markets that use capital asset pricing model are unable to explain small firms abnormal returns. However, there is an inconsistency with such approach. Because blaming only pricing model for dismissing some risk factors is inappropriate. Keim (1983) explains that small firms get excessive abnormal return in January in each year and average or small positive return in remaining months, therefore risk is unable to explain such tendency alone. Myriad investigated studies constantly validated small firm effect in the market, as well as market inefficiency. One of the remarkable research related to small firm effect conducted by Banz (1981). The sample stocks cover the period between 1926 and 1975 that listed in New York Stock Exchange. Monthly return files used in order to get monthly information of sample stocks. The study revealed that on a risk adjusted basis the fifty small firms outperformed the fifty large firms on average 1% each observed month. Klein and Bawa (1977) explain such abnormal return by stating that available information about small firms are less than large firms, that make them more risky and neglected by investors. Therefore small stocks undergo excessive high return. However Banz (1981) states that such explanation is just conjecture and is not enough to explain such phenomenon. No any precise explanation of small firm effect has been put forward until now, therefore this phenomenon still exists as an irrefutable argument against market efficiency.

Conclusion

The objective of this paper was to determine whether securities markets reflect the main features of efficient market hypothesis or the opposite occurs. In order to analyze these points this paper has looked at the results of different case studies and comprehensive investigations presented by academic community. From these empirical evidences it can be clearly seen that in practice markets display ineffective performance rather than effective one. Results showed that noticeable delay happens in the stock prices reflection of newly announced information which contradicts the assumption that stock prices quickly and immediately reflect new information. The next principal limitation of this hypothesis is about predictability of stock price. Analyses revealed that with the help of technical and fundamental analyses it is possible to predict stock prices movement in the future and get excess return. One of the main drawback of efficient market hypothesis appeared after the emergence of behavioural finance theory. This theory proved that stock prices movement is subject to investor sentiment and may over or under reacted by investors. Which destroyed the assumption of efficient market hypothesis about all investors rationally act in their decision-making process. The subsequent limitation of efficient market hypothesis revealed by examining small firms affects over the market. Efficient market hypothesis still unable to explain continuing abnormal return associated with small firms. Although these evidences show inefficient performance of the markets, it can be efficient in some way. However it became clear that efficient market hypothesis faced with significant loss of faith among investors due to substantial changes occurred in recent decades. Nowadays it is very crucial to set up new financial theory that will meet the requirements of current market and economical conjuncture.

1. Fama E. (1970), “Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work”, Journal of Finance,Vol.25, No.2, pp. 383–417

2. Dimson,E. and Mussavian, M. (1998),“A brief history of market efficiency”, European Financial Management, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp 91-193

3. Lynn A. Stout, (2003), “The Mechanisms of Market Inefficiency: An Introduction to the New Finance”, Journal of Corporation Law, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 635-639

4. Gilson, R. J. and Kraakman, R. H.(1984),“The Mechanisms of Market Efficiency”, Virginia Law Review, Vol. 70, No. 4, pp. 549-644

5. Victor, L. Bernard and Jacob, K. Thomas. (1989),“Post-Earnings-Announcement Drift: Delayed Price Response or Risk Premium?” Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 27,pp. 1-36

6. Bako, E. D. and Sechel, I. C. (2013), “ Technical and fundamental anomalies. paradoxes of modern stock exchange market”, Annals of Faculty of Economics, Vol. 1, No 1, pp 37-43

7. Clarke, J. T. Jandik, and Gershon Mandelker.(2001), “The efficient markets hypothesis”, In Expert Financial Planning: Advice from Industry Leaders, ed. R. Arffa, pp. 126-141, New York: Wiley & Sons.

8. Brock, W. A, Lakonishok, J. and LeBaron, B. (1992), “Simple technical trading rules and the stochastic properties of stock returns”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 47, No. 5, pp. 1731-1764

9. Jeffery, S. A. and Brian, J. B. (1998), "Abnormal Returns to a Fundamental Analysis Strategy", The Accounting Review, Vol. 73, No. 1 pp. 19-45

10. Jane, A. O. and Stephen, H. P. (1989), "Financial statement analysis and the prediction of stock returns", Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 11, No 4, pp. 295–329 11. Malcolm B. and Jeffrey W. (2007), " Investor Sentiment in the Stock Market", Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 129–151

12. Anastasios, K., Androniki, K., George, B. and Maria, E.V. (2012), "From efficient market hypothesis to behavioural finance: can behavioural finance be the new dominant model for investing?", Scientific Bulletin – Economic Sciences, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 16-26

13. De Bondt, W. F. M. and Richard H. T. (1985), " Does the Stock Market Overreact?", The Journal of Finance, Vol. 40, No.3, pp. 793–805

14. Nicholas, B., Andrei, S. and Robert V. (1998), "A model of investor sentiment", Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 49, No 3, pp. 307–343

15. Louis, K. C. CHAN, Narasimhan J. and Josef L. (1997), " Momentum strategies", The Journal of Finance, Vol. 51, No. 5, pp. 1681-1713

16. Burton G. Malkiel (1987), "Efficient market hypothesis", The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, Vol. 2, pp. 120-123

17. Keim, Donald, B. (1983), "Size-related anomalies and stock return seasonality", Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 12, No 1, pp. 13-32

18. Banz, Rolf, W. (1981), "The relationship between return and market value of common stocks ", Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp 3–18

19. Klein, R. and Bawa, V. (1977), "The effect of limited information and estimation risk on optimal portfolio diversification", Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 89-111

20. Chang , S. and David Y. Suk (1998), "Stock Prices and the Secondary Dissemination of Information: The Wall Street Journal's “Insider Trading Spotlight” Column", The Financial Review, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 115–128

21. Daniel, K., Hirshleifer, D. and Subrahmanyam, A. (1998), "Investor psychology and security market under- and overreactions", The Journal of Finance, Vol. 53, No. 6, pp. 1839-1885.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Efficient Market Hypothesis

...Efficient Market Hypothesis Efficient Market - Introduction  An efficient capital market is a market that is efficient in processing information Assumptions for Market to be Efficient 1. 2.  In other words, the market quickly and correctly adjusts to new information In an efficient market, the prices of securities observed at any time are based on “correct” evaluation of all information available at that time In an efficient market, prices immediately and fully reflect all available information Large no. of investors analyze and value securities for profit New information comes to the market in a random fashion  3. 4. Stock Prices adjust quickly to the new information Stock Prices should available information reflect all  Definition "In an efficient market, competition among the many intelligent participants leads to a situation where, at any point in time, actual prices of individual securities already reflect the effects of information based both on events that have already occurred and on events which, as of now, the market expects to take place in the future. In other words, in an efficient market at any point in time the actual price of a security will be a good estimate of its intrinsic value.“ - Professor Eugene Fama Efficient Market Hypothesis - Forms Efficient Market Hypothesis Weak Form Semi-Strong Form Strong Form The EMH Graphically All information, public & private • In this diagram, the circles represent the amount of information that each...

Words: 846 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Efficient Market Hypothesis

...of history, magical thinking, quasimagical thinking, attention anomalies, the availability heuristic, culture and social contagion, and global culture. Theories of human behavior from psychology, sociology, and anthropology have helped motivate much recent empirical research on the behavior of financial markets. In this paper I will survey both some of the most significant theories (for empirical finance) in these other social sciences and the empirical finance literature itself. Particular attention will be paid to the implications of these theories for the efficient markets hypothesis in finance. This is the hypothesis that financial prices efficiently incorporate all public information and that prices can be regarded as optimal estimates of true investment value at all times. The efficient markets hypothesis in turn is based on more primitive notions that people behave rationally, or accurately maximize expected utility, and are able to process all available information. The idea behind the term “efficient markets hypothesis,” a term coined by Harry Roberts (1967),1 has a long history in financial research, a far longer history than the term itself has. The hypothesis (without the words This paper was prepared for John B. Taylor and Michael Woodford, Editors, Handbook of Macroeconomics. An earlier version was presented...

Words: 18103 - Pages: 73

Premium Essay

Efficient Market Hypothesis

...1. Explain what efficient market hypothesis is. ` In a simple statement, the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) means that security prices fully reflect all available information (Fama, 1991). There are three forms of EMH. Weak Form EMH Semi-Strong Form EMH Strong Form EMH • All past prices of a stock are reflected in today's stock price. • Technical analysis cannot be used to predict and beat a market. • All public information is calculated into a stock's current share price. • Neither fundamental nor technical analysis can be used to achieve superior gains. • All information in a market, whether public or private, is accounted for in a stock price. • Not even insider information could give an investor the advantage. Adapted from http://www.investopedia.com/exam-guide/cfa-level-1/securities-markets/weak-semistrong-strong-emh-efficient-market-hypothesis.asp#axzz27eAhlXfl The assumptions behind this hypothesis are; 1. A large number of profit-maximising participants analyse and value securities independently. 2. News regarding securities comes to the market randomly and independently. 3. Trading decisions of all the investors adjust security prices rapidly to reflect the effect of new information. . 2. Link it to the idea of the fully revealing rational expectations equilibria. The EMH is the application of Rational Expectations Theory by Muth (1961). Assuming there is only one equilibrium price, it states that outcomes do not differ systematically from what...

Words: 905 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Efficient Markets Hypothesis

...September 2002 pp. 233–243 COMMENTARY The “Incomplete Revelation Hypothesis” and Financial Reporting Robert J. Bloomfield Robert J. Bloomfield is an Associate Professor at Cornell University. INTRODUCTION The most common form of the Efficient Markets Hypothesis (EMH) states that market prices fully reflect all publicly available information (Fama 1970). The EMH has been highly influential among academics, but practitioners and regulators appear unconvinced. Investors work hard to identify mispriced stocks on the basis of public data, or pay others to do so, even though the EMH asserts that such efforts are wasted. Managers seek to boost stock prices by hiding bad news in footnotes, and regulators work hard to defeat such efforts, even though the EMH asserts that information is reflected in prices no matter how obscure its presentation. Beliefs about inefficiency play a central role in the debate over recognizing expenses for incentive stock options. Opponents of expensing argue that the resulting lower net income will inappropriately reduce market prices, while proponents argue the market does not fully recognize compensation costs reported only in footnotes. In efficient markets, however, expensing these costs has no direct effect on prices, as long as the details of the compensation are included in footnotes. The decision to expense option costs could reduce stock price indirectly, even in efficient markets, by affecting the terms of contracts between the reporting firm and...

Words: 6063 - Pages: 25

Free Essay

Efficient Market Hypothesis

...02-19-2014 FINMAN 5B 1:30-2:30 MWF D522 “TESTS AND RESULTS IN EFFICIENT MARKET HYPOTHESIS” a.) Weak Form EMH -Tests of “Statistical memory” in security prices and returns Statistical tests of independence between rates of return: * Autocorrelation tests- it is mostly support the weak-form EMH and indicates that price changes are random and some studies using more securities and more complicated tests cast some doubt. *Runs tests – it indicates randomness in prices -Tests of Trading rules Comparison of trading rules to a buy-and-hold policy * Some filter rules seem yield above-average profits with small filters, but only before taking into account the substantial transactions costs involved * Trading rule results have been mixed, and most have not been able to beat a buy-and-hold policy Problems with tests: *Cannot be definitive since trading rules can be complex and there are too many to test them all *Testing constraints- it use only publicly available data, it should include all transactions costs and it should adjust the results for risk (an apparently successful strategy may just be a very risky strategy). Results generally support the weak-form EMH, but results are not unanimous- it shows that some strategies too subjective to test and not all trading rules are disclosed. b.) Semi Strong Form EMH -Tests often involve “market-adjusted returns” It is created by subtracting the market return from the security’s return, thereby defining a security’s...

Words: 843 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Efficient Market Hypothesis

...Efficient Market Hypothesis * EMH emerged in the 1950s due to early application of computers in analysis of time series behaviour of economic variables. * The general idea of EMH is that markets incorporate all available information into all prices and the assumptions are that there is elimination of riskless profit opportunities and all prices of stocks are equal to their fundamental value and we have Rational expectations: agents use optimal forecasts based on all information available so as to minimise the forecast error. * In 1970 Eugine Fama defined EMH and divided it into 3 main forms. There are three main forms of EMH that are usually tested by researchers. * Weak form states that past prices have no influence on current prices or in other words it is impossible to use past information to predict future prices since all this info is already priced into stocks * Semi strong form states that market efficiency takes into account all publicly available information, past and present, such as financial reports, public announcements * Strong form states that all information, including that of insiders is reflected in prices and therefore cannot be useful in price forecasting * Early tests which focus on the performance of investment analysts and mutual funds tend to support the EMH in that past good performance does not indicate that an advisor or mutual fund will perform well in the future. For example – Jensen (1967) measures the predictive...

Words: 814 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Emh (the Efficient Market Hypothesis.)

...ASSIGNMENT OF INVESTMENT AND PORTFOLIO ANALYSIS Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) SUBMITTED TO DR. NIAMAT KHAN SUBMITTED BY SSH SHAYKH ROLL NO: 04 INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT STUDY UNIVERSITY OF PESHAWAR Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) Has been consented as one of the cornerstones of modern financial economics. Fama first defined the term "efficient market" in financial literature in 1965 as one in which security prices fully reflect all available information. The market is efficient if the reaction of market prices to new information should be immediate and impartial. Efficient market hypothesis is the initiative that information is quickly, and efficiently integrated into asset prices at any position in time, so that old information cannot be used to foretell future price movements. Therefore, three versions of EMH are being notable depends on the level of available information. TYPES OF Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) Weak form EMH The current asset prices already imitate past price and volume information. The information enclosed in the past succession of prices of a security is completely reflected in the current market price of that security. It is named weak form because the security prices are the most publicly and easily available pieces of information. It implies that no one should be able to smash the market using something that "everybody else knows". Yet, there are still numbers of financial researchers who are studying the past stock price cycle...

Words: 1232 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Weak Form Efficiency and Calendar Anomalies: Comparison Between Developed and Developing Equity Markets

...Developed and Developing Equity Markets Syed Zulfiqar Ali Shah Assistant Professor-Finance, Department of Business Administration Faculty of Management Sciences, International Islamic University Islamabad E-mail: zulfiqar.shah@gmail.com Muhammad Husnain Ph.D Scholar (Finance) Mohammad Ali Jinnah University Islamabad Email: Husnain_ctn@yahoo.com Abstract Financial economists have continuously questioned the efficient market hypothesis especially in last decade. Major part of discussion is whether the equity markets are efficient and if not then up to what extent one can forecast the meaningful future movement of equity prices. On one side there are believers of random walk and contrary there are followers of chartist theories. Those who negate the random walk suggested that there exist anomalies in the equity markets and hence are not perfectly efficient. The major objective of this study is to check the weak form of efficiency and presence of calendar anomalies in equity markets of developing and developed countries. On the basis of most recent and relatively longer horizon (14 Year) data on daily basis and a range of powerful econometrics this study suggested that in broader sense both of developed and developing equity markets are weak form inefficient. Hence there is no remarkable difference in term of market efficiency in equity markets of developed and developing countries. Hence one can reject the random walk hypothesis and therefore presence of markets efficiency is again a matter...

Words: 8230 - Pages: 33

Free Essay

“When the Price of a Stock Can Be Influenced by a “Herd” on Wall Street with Prices Set at the Margin by the Most Emotional Person, or the Greediest Person, or the Most Depressed Person, It Is Hard to Argue That the

...that the market always prices rationally. In fact, market prices are frequently nonsensical.” ------------------------------------------------- This report will analysis the statement by Warren Buffett, and it considers the contrasting evidence on the validity of the observation on the Efficient Markets Hypothesis. The report briefly outlines the forms of the Efficient Market Hypothesis, the report also analysis’s the evidence both seminal and recent on the theory relating to the three forms of the hypothesis. It also examines the theoretical role and motivation of analysts in creating market efficiency; lastly it looks at alternative perspectives on the pricing of securities. Introduction In 1984 Warren Buffett penned an article titled “The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville”, based on a speech he had given on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of his mentor Ben Graham’s legendary textbook, Security Analysis. In it, Buffett rejected the then growing (and now entrenched) view in academia that markets are ''efficient'' because ''stock prices reflect everything that is known about a company’s prospects and about the state of the economy.'' Warren Buffett argued against EMH, saying the preponderance of value investors among the world's best money managers rebuts the claim of EMH proponents that luck is the reason some investors appear more successful than others. (Hoffman, 2010) This report will either agree with Buffet or somewhat sit on the fence. A market is said...

Words: 2524 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

The Evolution of Stock Market Efficiency over Time: a Survey of the Empirical Literature

...THE EVOLUTION OF STOCK MARKET EFFICIENCY OVER TIME: A SURVEY OF THE EMPIRICAL LITERATURE Kian-Ping Lim Universiti Malaysia Sabah and Monash University and Robert Brooks Monash University Background This paper provides an insight into the empirical literature as pertains the evolution of stock market efficiency over time, with a keen focus on the weak form Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH). The authors provide a systematic review of the correlation between several financial factors namely: Adaptive Markets Hypothesis (AMH), Efficient Markets Hypothesis (EMH), Evolving Return Predictability, Stock markets and Weak-form EMH. The authors pay keen attention on how return predictability from past price changes is affected by key players and determinants on the stock markets. From the survey they conduct, the posit that the bulk of the empirical studies examine whether the stock market under study is or is not weak-form efficient in the absolute sense, assuming that the level of market efficiency remains unchanged throughout the estimation period. The authors acknowledge that one field that has drawn extensive investigation by scholars and other players alike is the predictability of stock returns on the basis of past price changes. This is partly due to its direct implication on weak-form market efficiency. They find that a vast majority of the literature implicitly assumes the level of market efficiency remains unchanged throughout the estimation period. However, the possibility...

Words: 1925 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Positive Accounting Theory

...Chapter 7 - Positive Theory Positive Accounting Theory Philosophy of PAT Million Friedman championed positive theories in economics. He stated that: (part 3 Empirical Research in Accounts of Accounting theory from Jayne Godfrey) The ultimate goal of positive science (i.e. INDUCTIVE) is • The development of a ‘theory ‘ or ‘hypothesis’; • that yields valid and meaningful “Predictions’ • about phenomena not yet “observed”. Consistent with Friedman’s view, Watts and Zimmerman asserts that: The objective of “positive accounting theory” is to “explain” and “predict” accounting practice. • “Explanation” means providing reasons for observed practice. For example, positive accounting theory seeks to explain why firms continue to use historical cost accounting and why certain firms switch between a numbers of accounting techniques. • “Prediction” of accounting practice means that the theory predicts “unobserved phenomena”. Watts and Zimmerman start their book with a fundamental statement of The Role of Theory (Chapter 1).They asserts that the objective of positive accounting theory is to explain and predict accounting practice,(p.2) “Unobserved phenomena” are not necessarily future phenomena; they include phenomena that have occurred, but on which systematic evidence has not been collected. For example – Predicting the reaction of firms to a proposed accounting standard and an explanation of why firms would lobby for and against...

Words: 2421 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

Case Study

...create passively managed mutual funds that are based on market indices, known as index funds. Advocates claim that index funds routinely beat a large majority of actively managed mutual funds (this is proved by the graph provided); one study claimed that over time, the average actively managed fund has returned 1.8% less than the S&P 500 index - a result nearly equal to the average expense ratio of mutual funds (fund expenses are a drag on the funds' return by exactly that ratio). Since index funds attempt to replicate the holdings of an index, they obviate the need for active management, and have a lower churn rate. 2. Is the graph consistent or inconsistent with market efficiency? Explain carefully. The graph is consistent with market efficiency. The efficient market hypothesis (EMH) states that it is not possible to consistently outperform the market by using any information that the market already knows, except through luck. Information or news in the EMH is defined as anything that may affect prices that is unknowable in the present and thus appears randomly in the future. Market efficiency hypothesis is the simple statement that security prices fully reflect all available information. A precondition for this strong version of the hypothesis is that information and trading costs, the costs of getting prices to reflect information, are always 0. A weaker and economically more sensible version of the efficiency hypothesis says that prices reflect information to the point where...

Words: 513 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Financial Crisis

...October 28, 2011 The Efficient-Market Hypothesis and the Financial Crisis Burton G. Malkiel* Abstract The world-wide financial crisis of 2008-2009 has left in its wake severely damaged economies in the United States and Europe. The crisis has also shaken the foundations of modern-day financial theory, which rested on the proposition that our financial markets were basically efficient. Critics have even suggested that the efficient--market–hypotheses (EMH) was in large part, responsible for the crises. This paper argues that the critics of EMH are using a far too restrictive interpretation of what EMH means. EMH does not imply that asset prices are always “correct.” Prices are always wrong, but no one knows for sure if they are too high or too low. EMH does not imply that bubbles in asset prices are impossible nor does it deny that environmental and behavioral factors cannot have profound influences on required rates of return and risk premiums. At its core, EMH implies that arbitrage opportunities for riskless gains do not exist in an *Princeton University. I am indebted to Alan Blinder and to the participants in the Russell Sage Conference on Economic Lessons From the Financial Crisis for extremely helpful comments. 2 efficiently functioning market and if they do appear from time to time that they do not persist. The evidence is clear that this version of EMH is strongly supported by the data. EMH can comfortably coexist with behavior finance, and the insights of Hyman...

Words: 11209 - Pages: 45

Premium Essay

Simulation

...QUESTION 8. 10 points Use the data in nyse.dta to answer these questions. Our goal here is to test the efficient markets hypothesis (EMH). The strict form of the efficient markets hypothesis states that information observable to the market prior to week t should not help predict the return in week t. The EMH presumes that any such investment opportunities will be noticed and will disappear almost instantaneously. One simple way to test this is to specify the AR(1) model returnt = ß0 + ß1return t-1 + ut as the alternative. Then, the null hypothesis is easily stated as H: ß0 = 0 Compute weekly returns in nyse.dta are computed using data from January 1976 through March 1989. The close at the next trading day was used. Consider a special form of heteroskedasticity common in financial data, that of auto-regressive conditional heteroskedasticity (ARCH) a way of describing volatility in market returns. QUESTION 9: 5 points Estimate the following equation, where us is the residuals from the AR(1) model given above: U2 = ß0 + ß1return t-1 + ut Let there be the fitted values from this equation (the estimates of the conditional variance). How many of are negative? QUESTION 10 5 points Add to the model return2t-1 and again compute the fitted values h1. Are any h1 negative? Why is the sign important? QUESTION 11 5 points. Use the from the model relating the variance in the error to the return in the last week and the return in the last week squared and estimate by weighted least...

Words: 349 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Finance

...CHAPTER 11 Efficient Markets and Behavioral Finance Answers to Problem Sets 1. c   2. Weak, semistrong, strong, strong, weak.   3. a. False b. False c. True d. False e. False f. True   4. a. False - In what kind of markets do financing decisions occur? Investment Decisions occur where? b. False - c. True – what information do stocks not reflect? d. False- returns are the same for what kind of stocks?   5. 6 - (-.2 + 1.45 X 5) = -1.05%.   6. a. True b. False c. True d. True – can managers increase EPS?   7. Decrease. The stock price already reflects an expected 25% increase. The 20% increase conveys bad news relative to expectations.   8. a. Executives should not plan on issuing shares based on apparent trends or cycles in their company’s stock price. b. Executives can observe their company’s stock price change and use the change as a reliable source of market-based information about the future prospects of the company. Stock price changes are the best forecast of a company’s future earnings as well as the best forecast future industry earnings. c. A financial manager evaluating the creditworthiness of a large customer could check the customer’s stock price and the yield on its debt. A falling stock price or a high yield could indicate trouble ahead. d. Don’t...

Words: 2339 - Pages: 10