Free Essay

Eminent Domain Paper

In: Historical Events

Submitted By Yattainc
Words 1214
Pages 5
When Should Eminent Domain be Used?

When should a city or state use their eminent domain powers? Over the past few years there have been a couple of cases that raised the questions of when eminent domain should be used. One of the most controversial cases in the history of the United States was the Kelo v New
London Supreme Court ruling. In order to generate tax revenue, add jobs, and to prevent bankruptcy, the government’s right to initiate eminent domain for public good is a necessary evil.
Eminent domain in definition is “the right or power of public purposes without the owner’s consent on payment of just compensation” (“Eminent Domain History”). Eminent domain has been a part of the United States ever since the constitution was created.
Eminent domain is not stated in the constitution. However, it is implied at the end if the
Fifth Amendment, " [no person should] be deprived of life, liberty, or property be taken for public use, without just compensation" (U.S. Constitution). Eminent domain is not new to the United
States. The first eminent domain case was “in 1879 the Supreme Court, in the case of Boom Co.
v. Patterson, (98 U.S. 403) said that eminent domain appertains to every independent government. It requires no constitutional recognition; it is an attribute of sovereignty" (“Draw the
Line”). After World War II, eminent domain was used on a regular basis. "In 1954, the Supreme
Court ruled in Berman v Parker that private projects meet the definition if they have a public purpose" (“Eminent Domain History”). Eminent domain is a sad way for a family to lose there home. Eminent domain is not a way a family should lose their home, without it being taken for a good reason. It is sad for a family to lose everything they have, because the government wants to generate more tax revenue, or create more jobs. For example in the Kelo v. New London
Supreme Court case “one woman who was born in her house 87 years ago and has lived there since, had resisted the plan and refused the city’s offer of compensation” (Khawaja, Irfan).
However, making this lady leave is helping out the city that she adores and loves. It would be wrong for the city to ask this lady to leave if it would not benefit the city. However, by using eminent domain to generate tax revenue in this case is justified.
A city or state has the right to use eminent domain if the area being taken is transferred to another private individual or corporation if it would increase the tax base of the community. For example, in New London, Connecticut some "homeowners argued that their neighborbood, unlike previous neighborhood cleared by use of eminent domain, was not blighted and redevelopment was not necessarily for the public good" (“Kelo v. New London” Now). However, "New London
[was] deemed a distressed municipality by the state fifteen years ago" (Khawaja, Irfan). "Under the rationale that private developments outlined in the plan would increase the tax base of the area and the economic vitality of the city" (“Kelo v. New London” Now). If a city is declared a distressed municipality and evicting the homeowners from their home's in order to generate thousands in tax revenue compared to just hundreds in tax revenue is nothing but common since.
In New London “city officials said, $680,000 in property tax revenue” would be generated yearly compared to just hundreds that the homeowners would have to pay in taxes yearly (Lane,
Charles). The city's move would keep it from going bankrupt, and it would help the city grow.
However, eminent domain should also be used if it would create jobs for the city or state.
A city or state should use their eminent domain powers if it would create jobs for the public. For example, in New London the land that was going to be taken “was projected to create in excess of 1,000 jobs" (Kelo v. New London, Connecticut). Which "New London [was] deemed a distressed municipality by the state 15 years ago, has a high unemployment rate and fewer residents today then it has in 1920" (Khawaja, Irfan). Along with the addition with the new jobs more families would move to the area. Which would cause the city to grow and that would provide more money to the government with the increased tax revenue from all of the new families. This could create more jobs, because more companies might be interested in locating there due to all of the growth. Eminent domain should also be used by a city or state if it prevents it from going bankrupt.

A city or state should use eminent domain if it prevents it from going bankrupt. If a city is near bankrupt then it cannot provide all of the necessary items that a city needs in order to run like it is supposed to. For example, if a city is short of funds then it would have to reduce its budget in places that would harm the city. It would have to cut money from the police, and fire departments. However, by using their eminent domain powers a city could keep all of this from happening by letting a business come that would create thousands in tax dollars, and add jobs to the city. This means that a reduction in the police and fire departments would not happen and the city would still run smoothly.

The cities and states that use eminent domain to acquire land in order to keep themselves running smoothly is sad; however, these cities and states are looking out for what is best for their areas. These cities and states are not trying to make families move out of their homes in order to earn a quick dollar. These cities and states are only looking out for the best interest for their areas. The cities and states that are using their eminent domain powers are only trying to generate tax revenue, create jobs, or to prevent themselves from going bankrupt in order to keep their areas running smoothly as possible. However, if the cities and states did not care for their people, then they would let their cities and states go bankrupt or not provide enough jobs for the thousands of workers in their cities and states.

Works Cited

“Draw the line in Alabaster.” 21 Aug. 2003: 27 Nov. 2005 “Eminent Domain History.” Now. Politics & Economy. The History of Eminent Domain PBS. 27
Nov. 2005
Kelo v. New London, Connecticut. No. 04-108 Supreme Ct. of the US. 23 June 2005.
“Kelo v. New London.” Now Politics & Economy. The Debate over the Eminent Domain. Kelo v.
New London… 10 Nov. 2005
Khawaja, Irfan. “Don’t Forgive Them, for they Know Exactly What They’ve Done: A Comment on the Kelo Case” History News Network. 26 June 2005 Lane, Charles. “Justices Affirm Property Seizures.” 24 June 2005:
Washington Post. 10 Nov. 2005
“U.S. Constitution: Fifth Amendment.” Findlaw: U.S. Constitution: Fifth Amendment Findlaw. 11
Nov. 2005


Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Eminent Domain

...Student name Institution name Date Introduction Question: Is the policy of eminent domain providing for the public welfare, through the taking of privately owned property, using a rightful procedure involving due process and just compensation as it was intended to do when the policy was founded? Eminent domain is the inherent power of the government to take over a citizen's property for public use without the owner's consent. Initially, this public policy originated in the Middle Ages throughout the world. It became part of the British common law before reaching the United States where it was then illustrated in the US Constitution in 1791 (Britannica: eminent domain). The Fifth Amendment granted the federal government the right to exercise eminent domain, provided protection to individuals, and protected the property rights of citizens. Shortly after the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment made the federal guarantee of “just compensation” applicable to the states. The use of eminent domain power to promote economic development, particularly in urban centers of the United States, has become the focus of significant controversy in this present day. This is commonly done when the acquisition of property is needed for the completion of certain project. Projects intended for the public good such as highways, bridges, schools, and government buildings have been created from Eminent Domain. The policy pertains to every independent government. It requires very......

Words: 3810 - Pages: 16

Free Essay

Business Damages

...Research Paper April 27, 2001 House Bill No. 197 – Business Damages House Bill 197 is a bill that amends Idaho Code Section 7-711 in regards to business damages in eminent domain or condemnation proceedings. The article, “Valuing Business Goodwill Loss in Eminent Domain Cases” by Robert Trout defines a condemnation as: The process of taking private property for public use through the power of eminent domain (government). Trout states, The loss of property causes economic damages consisting of lost tangible asset values and, when appropriate, lost intangible asset values, primarily business goodwill. Tangible assets are those that show up on a balance sheet, including real property. Examples include land, buildings, and equipment. Intangible assets are other assets of a business that can be individually identified and valued. Examples include trademarks, patents, copyrights, trade secrets, customer lists, and goodwill. (Trout) Business damages are new just last year (2000) to Idaho law. Prior to that there were no laws stating that a condemnor had to pay a condemnee for their business loss due to the acquisition of new property. Being so new, Idaho does not have a definition of goodwill. California does however, and the lawmakers there identify it as: [B]enefits that accrue to a business as a result of its location, reputation for dependability, skill, or quality, and any other circumstances resulting in probable retention of......

Words: 1161 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay


...The primary focus of lawsuits, such as that brought on behalf of WTC workers, and compensation schemes such as workers’ compensation is on paying those who have injured or made ill. The OSH Act created a general duty on the part of every covered employer to maintain a work environment free from “recognized hazards causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employee.” It also created a federal agency, the Occupational safety and Health Administration (OSHA), empowered to oversee safety and health standards, by enforcing the general duty clause and by writing and enforcing detailed health and safety standards for each industry, and the National Institute of Occupational safety and Health(NIOSH), to provide research, information, education, and training. On-the-job risk:1 many dangers, such as falls from roofs or amputations form unguarded machinery.2 forceful exertions, repetitive movements and awkward posture. 3 dactyl and the food flavorings that cause bronchiolitis obliterans or modern metalworking fluid.4 workers compensation: Firms contribute to a workers’ compensation fund that is used to pay benefits to employees accidentally injured in the workplace. Instead of suing ,an employee’s legal task is simplified . she need not prove the company was negligent, nor can the company raise any of traditional defenses to negligence to defeat her claim. Employers are willing to accept this approach because there is a trade-off: if workers compensation......

Words: 545 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Land Acquistion

...legislation will benefit both industry and those whose livelihood is dependent on land. It provides two times more compensation in urban areas and four times more compensation in rural areas than the circle price. The circle rates are decided by the local government on the basis of average sale price for the last 3 years or last 3 months whichever is higher. The bill establishes regulations for land acquisition as a part of India's massive industrialization drive driven by public-private partnership. The bill will be central legislation in India for the rehabilitation and resettlement of families affected by land acquisitions. In addition the bill has a provision by which states can add some more benefits to it. The bill will eclipse the eminent domain criteria and introduce voting criteria in which 80% of the people should say yes only then land will be acquired. The Bill will replace the decade old Land Acquisition Act of 1894, which was enacted during British rule. However there is still some confusion whether the bill is boon or a bane. Many people say it is a boon, others say that it is just a move to increase the vote bank in the forthcoming elections. DISADVANTAGES OF THE BILL The Industry has serious concerns on some of the provisions of the Land Acquisition Bill. 1. The CII say that the cost of land...

Words: 611 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Case Study

...[Type the company name] | Unit 4: Case Study | You be the Judge: Carvin v. Arkansas Power and Light | | | 5/29/2012 | | Easement is when one person is given the right to enter land belonging to another and make a limited use of it, without taking anything away (Beatty & Samuelson, 2010). There are two ways easements can be created by property managers and one is by a grant while the other one is by a reservation. By Arkansas Power and Light obtaining “flood easements” on the property adjoining the lakes it permitted them to clear of trees, brush, and other obstructions and to submerge by water certain acreage. Judging the fact that Arkansas Power and Light obtained the flooding easements between 1923 and 1947 and this documentation was properly recorded on file when the new landowners purchased the lakeside property, I definitely do believe that those easements relieve them from liability for flooding. These are types of interests that never involve possession. The reservation and grant occurred when Arkansas Power and Light sold the lakeside property but kept some right to enter the property. The seller of a home must disclose facts that a buyer does not know and cannot readily observe if they materially affect the property’s value (Beatty & Samuelson, 2010). When Arkansas Power and Light sold the property to the current landowners they made sure they were informed and aware of the documents recorded of the easement. The main purpose...

Words: 382 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Land Acquisition in India

...LAND ACQUISITION IN INDIA A REPORT SUBMITTED FOR THE COURSE “THE INDIAN ECONOMY” SUBMITTED BY: BISWAPRIYA SAHA DEEPSHIKHA GOVLI HIMANI KABRA ITISHREE DASH MRITYUNJAY BASAK PGP/17/076 PGP/17/077 PGP/17/080 PGP/17/083 PGP/17/094 Page 2 of 13 Table of Content ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ............................................................................................................................ 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 5 BENEFITS OF LAND ACQUISITION ....................................................................................................... 6 NEGATIVE IMPACT ON FARMERS ........................................................................................................ 6 NEGATIVE IMPACT ON TRIBALS .......................................................................................................... 6 NEGATIVE IMPACT ON SOCIETY.......................................................................................................... 6 NEGATIVE IMPACT ON ENVIRONMENT ............................................................................................. 6 CRITICISM OF LAND ACQUISITION POLICY ...................................................................................... 7......

Words: 3341 - Pages: 14

Free Essay

Eminem Domain

... | Eminent Domain: Being Abused? July 4, 2004 [pic] |[pic]The City of Lakewood, Ohio was trying to use | | |eminent domain to force Jim and Joanne Saleet out of | | |their house in order to make way for expensive | | |condominiums.  (AP) | | |Quote | | |[pic] | | |"For them to come in and tell me how much my | | |property's worth and for me to get out because they're| | |bringing in somebody else when I own the land is | | |unfounded to me.” | | |Shop owner Randy Bailey of Mesa, Ariz. | | |[pic] | | (CBS) Just about everyone knows that under a process called eminent domain, the government can (and does) seize private property for public use - to build a road, a school or a courthouse. But did you know the government can also seize your land for private use if they can prove that doing it will serve what's called "the public good"? Cities across the country have been using eminent domain to force people off their land, so private developers can build more expensive homes and offices that will pay more in property taxes than the buildings they're replacing. Under eminent domain, the government buys your property, paying you what's......

Words: 1946 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

What Constitutional Issue Did the Supreme Court Take the Case to Answer, and What Was Its Answer?

...ownership right in all land. This right is known as eminent domain. Eminent domain is the power of the government to take private property from a citizen, even when that citizen refuses to voluntarily sell the property. In the United States, use of the eminent domain power is limited by a clause in the Fifth Amendment of the constitution, which states “nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation”. Long established purposes for the eminent domain power have been for the building of roads and public buildings, but it has become increasingly common for state or local governments to use the power for redevelopment projects. The city of New London, Connecticut established a private development corporation to redevelop a neighborhood near the shore of Long Island Sound with the goal of revitalizing the depressed area. A group of home owners, who lived on the targeted land, including Susette Kelo, decided to fight the issue rather than allow their homes to be destroyed. The Supreme Court case of Kelo v. City of New London established that eminent domain can be used for economic redevelopment projects. The U.S. Supreme Court's 5-4 ruling against the homeowners established that the Fifth Amendment's "public use" requirement is merely a "public purpose" requirement. The City of New London only needed to anticipate that the public will benefit in some way in order to justify a given use of eminent domain. New London anticipated that its......

Words: 279 - Pages: 2

Free Essay


...could suffer a catastrophic flood. The engineers acknowledged that releasing the water in the recommended manner would cause some limited flooding. As a result, Mr. Appleseed’s fruit orchard was flooded and he lost his crop for that year and many trees on his property were permanently destroyed. I will present my argument that this temporary flooding was a taking as defined by our text and was done so under eminent domain. When a property is taken in this manner the owner is justly compensated for the loss according to the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Keywords: eminent domain, taking, temporary flooding The practice of taking by eminent domain is deeply rooted in history long before it was written about in the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The term itself was taken from the legal treatise De Jure Belli et Pacis, which was written by Hugo Grotius in 1625. Grotius, whose various texts are considered the foundations for international law, defined the power as follows: The property of subjects is under the eminent domain of the state, so that the state or he who acts for it may use and even alienate and destroy such property, not only in the case of extreme necessity, in which even private persons have a right over the property of others, but for ends of public utility, to which ends those who founded civil society must be supposed to have intended that private ends should give way. But it is to be added...

Words: 1221 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Kelo V. City of New London

...Eminent domain is described as the power of the government to take private property for public use. The “Taking’s Clause” is described in the United States Constitution as “..Nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation”. In the case of Kelo v. City of New London, Connecticut, the city of New London did not violate the Taking’s Clause. It is stated in the case that the city purchased the property of 15 of the 24 owners. They were taking the property to build a research facility, a hotel and also stores and private residences. These are all for public use. Of course I can see how the homeowners would think that it was more for private use, the city of New London would be making profits from the sale of residential property and also from the building of the businesses. However they are for public use. Since the government had to take the landowners to court the government had to file suit to seek “condemnation” of the land. This is just stating that they are offering a just price for the land and awarding the title to the government. This was the case a few years back in the county I live in. I live in Crawford County, Ohio and the State of Ohio was working to rebuild a public highway. While they were offering large amounts of money to the land owners, a few of them tried to stand strong and not sell. Unfortunately they were forced to sell and then received less than the other landowners. I understand why they didn’t want to...

Words: 393 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Kelo Et Al. V. City of New London Et Al.

...of the Naval Undersea Warfare Center, reactivated the New London Development Corporation (NLDC), a non-profit entity for land development in the city, specifically the Fort Trumbull area vacated by the U.S. Navy. Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Inc. expressed an interest in locating a research and production facility in the area. The city advised the NLDC to move forward with its plans. Over 90 acres of property were purchased and acquired through eminent domain for the development of residential housing, recreational, marina, retail and industrial parcels. Of the 90 acres, thirty-two of the acres came from Fort Trumbull and the remainder from private owners. All private owners, except 15, sold to the city for the project. The remaining 15 held out not for money, but for emotional and sentimental reasons. The Supreme Court of Connecticut ruled in favor of the taking of the private property under eminent domain. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari and grouped all 15 cases in one appeal. IV. LEGAL ISSUES: Is the use of eminent domain to acquire property by the government and redirect for private use repugnant to the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution which reads “…nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation”? Is the taking of property from A and giving it to B for economic development a “public use” under the Fifth Amendment? V. COURT DECISION: In a 5 to 4 decision, the Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Connecticut......

Words: 1569 - Pages: 7

Free Essay


...Question 12 Page 170 On July 5, 1884, four sailors were cast away from their ship in a storm 1,600 miles from the Cape of Good Hope. Their lifeboat contained neither water nor much food. On the 20th day of their ordeal, Dudley and Stevens, without the assistance or agreement of Brooks, cut the throat of the fourth sailor, a 17- or 18-year-old boy. They had not eaten since day 12. Water had been available only occasionally. At the time of the death, the men were probably about 1,000 miles from land. Prior to his death, the boy was lying helplessly in the bottom of the boat. The three surviving sailors ate the boy’s remains for four days, at which point they were rescued by a passing boat. They were in a seriously weakened condition. a. Were Dudley and Stevens guilty of murder? Explain. b. Should Brooks have been charged with a crime for eating the boy’s flesh? Explain. See The Queen v. Dudley and Stephens, 14 Queen’s Bench Division 273 (1884). a. “The facts found on the special verdict shew that the prisoners were not guilty of murder, at the time when they killed Parker but killed him under the pressure of necessity. Necessity will excuse an act which would otherwise be a crime.”(justiceharvard) After reading this I believe that they did what they had to do in order to survive. They said the boy was weak and wouldn’t have made it anyway. They will have to live with the decision they made but they got to live because of it. b. No, he used it as a means to......

Words: 665 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Eminent Domain would move to Palmdale if it could not expand. Lancaster tried to buy 99 Cents' lease, but the company refused. Lancaster then used its power to emenent domain to condemn the 99 Cents property for the purpose of making city contrasted 99 Cents property for the purpose of making it available to Costco. the city noted that blight might follow if Costco left, and the city contrasted 99Cents' under $40,000 per year in sales taxes generated with costco's more then $400,000. 99 Cents then sued the city seeking an order blocking the effort to take the 99 Cents property Eminent domain allows states the right to take over private property, at fair market value, for public use. Due the declining economy of Lancaster, I would rule in favor of the state to take over 99 Cent Only Stores Property thereby allowing Costco to move in. The additional sales tax generated by allowing Costco to take over the property of 99 Cent Only Store would allow Lancaster to continue independently as a productive county. The present negative of eminent domain, in this case, wieghs far less than the positive outcome of ruling in favor of Costco. B. Would the result be any differnet today after the Supreme Court's 2005 decision in the New London, connecticut case? Explain According the to Supreme Courts ruling, the city can file for eminent domain even if the economy is not blighted. The result would be the same today; however, prior to ruling in favor of the state, I would require Costco's......

Words: 343 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Case 3

...would help to revitalize New London, is it just for the city to appropriate private property around Fort Trumbull? a. I believe that New London treated Kelo and her neighbors as fair as they could. The proposed development would hope to attract new development, which would help revitalize the community and bring in tax revenue. I believe it’s just for the city to appropriate private property around Fort Trumbull because of their power of eminent domain. 2. Are towns such as New London and Salina pursuing wise, beneficial, and progressive social policies, or are their actions socially harmful and biased against ordinary working people and small-business owners? a. I believe that New London and Salina are pursuing progressive social policies but their actions are socially harmful to the homeowners of the areas that they are taking over with their eminent domain right. 3. Do you believe that eminent domain is a morally legitimate right of government? Explain why or why not. a. I believe that eminent domain is a morally legitimate right of government. I feel this way because you are being compensated for your loss of property with either money or land or both. If the area where your home is located is potentially a prime area that could bring in new development and revitalize a community, I think that it is only fair that you are relocated for the sake of the community. 4. “If” ‘just compensation’ is paid, then by definition those who lose......

Words: 547 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Bus561 Property Case Study

...DB THREAD - PROPERTY Barney, like many retirees, is looking forward to enjoying the reward of his labor as well as the fruits of his investments in relative comfort. Although, one cannot control economic down shifts that undermine 401Ks, diminish stock portfolios or plummet real estate markets to unprecedented lows; it behooves all to seek out wise financial counsel. Anything can happen in financial management and investing. Wisdom, awareness, education and personal responsibility are necessary tools to hopefully ensure one’s retirement planning stays on target. “Fools think they need no advice, but the wise listen to others” Proverbs 12: 15 (New Living Translation). Regretfully, for Barney, he appears to become complacent over the years and allowed his investments to rather flounder unsupervised. The scripture is clear; we are responsible for our actions as well as our in-actions or sadly, complacency. “Look carefully then how you walk. Live purposefully and worthily and accurately, not as the unwise and witless, but as wise (sensible, intelligent people)…..Therefore do not be vague and thoughtless and foolish, but understanding and firmly grasping what the will of the Lord is” Ephesians 5: 15 and 17 (Amplified Bible). Barney’s joint tenancy with a right of survivorship with old friends appears to have hit a snag. One of the deceased owner’s sons, Opie, has assumed his father’s interest as denoted in his father’s will. Furthermore, the son utilized his perceived property as......

Words: 2273 - Pages: 10