Free Essay

Employee Engagement

In: Business and Management

Submitted By prasanjit94
Words 2658
Pages 11
Employee engagement
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Employee engagement, also called worker engagement, is a business management concept. An "engaged employee" is one who is fully involved in, and enthusiastic about their work, and thus will act in a way that furthers their organization's interests. According to Scarlett Surveys, "Employee Engagement is a measurable degree of an employee's positive or negative emotional attachment to their job, colleagues and organization that profoundly influences their willingness to learn and perform at work". Thus engagement is distinctively different from employee satisfaction, motivation and organisational culture.
Origins
Employee Engagement is the extent to which employee commitment, both emotional and intellectual, exists relative to accomplishing the work, mission, and vision of the organisation. Engagement can be seen as a heightened level of ownership where each employee wants to do whatever they can for the benefit of their internal and external customers, and for the success of the organization as a whole.
Employee engagement was described in the academic literature by Schmidt et al. (1993). A modernised version of job satisfaction, Schmidt et al.'s influential definition of engagement was "an employee's involvement with, commitment to, and satisfaction with work. Employee engagement is a part of employee retention." This integrates the classic constructs of job satisfaction (Smith et al., 1969), and organizational commitment (Meyer & Allen, 1991). Harter and Schmidt's (2003) most recent meta-analysis can be useful for understanding the impact of engagement. .
Linkage research (e.g., Treacy) received significant attention in the business community because of correlations between employee engagement and desirable business outcomes such as retention of talent, customer service, individual performance, team performance, business unit productivity, and even enterprise-level financial performance (e.g., Rucci et al, 1998 using data from Sears). Some of this work has been published in a diversity context (e.g., McKay, Avery, Morris et al., 2007). Directions of causality were discussed by Schneider and colleagues in 2003.
Employee engagement is derived from studies of morale or a group's willingness to accomplish organizational objectives which began in the 1920s. The value of morale to organizations was matured by US Army researchers during WWII to predict unity of effort and attitudinal battle-readiness before combat. In the postwar mass production society that required unity of effort in execution, (group) morale scores were used as predictors of speed, quality and militancy. With the advent of the knowledge worker and emphasis on individual talent management (stars), a term was needed to describe an individual's emotional attachment to the organization, fellow associates and the job. Thus the birth of the term "employee engagement" which is an individual emotional phenomenon whereas morale is a group emotional phenomenon of similar characteristics. In other words, employee engagement is the raw material of morale composed of 15 intrinsic and extrinsic attitudinal drivers.(e.g. Scarlett Surveys 2001).
More recently employee engagement has become an area of focus within organizations for the purpose of retention as a means of avoiding expensive employee replacement costs resulting from staff who voluntarily quit their jobs.[1] According to to SHRM (Society of Human Resource Management) the cost of replacing one $8 per hour employee can exceed $3,500, which gives companies a strong financial incentive to maintain their existing staff members through strong employee engagement practices.[2]
[edit] Research Studies
Engaged employees care about the future of the company and are willing to invest discretionary effort.[3] Engaged employees feel a strong emotional bond to the organisation that employs them (Robinson), which results in higher retention levels and productivity levels and lower absenteeism. When reliably measured, positive employee engagement can be causally related or correlated to specific positive business outcomes by workgroup and job type. Scarlett Surveys refers to these statistical relationships as engageonomics.
[edit] Emotional attachment
Only 31% of employees are actively engaged in their jobs.[4] These employees work with passion and feel a profound connection to their company. People that are actively engaged help move the organization forward. 88% of highly engaged employees believe they can positively impact quality of their organization's products, compared with only 38% of the disengaged.[5] 72% of highly engaged employees believe they can positively affect customer service, versus 27% of the disengaged.[citation needed] 68% of highly engaged employees believe they can positively impact costs in their job or unit, compared with just 19% of the disengaged.[3] Engaged employees feel a strong emotional bond to the organization that employs them.[6] This is associated with people demonstrating a willingness to recommend the organization to others and commit time and effort to help the organization succeed.[7] It suggests that people are motivated by intrinsic factors (e.g. personal growth, working to a common purpose, being part of a larger process) rather than simply focusing on extrinsic factors (e.g., pay/reward).[8]
[edit] Involvement
Eileen Appelbaum and her colleagues (2000) studied 15 steel mills, 17 apparel manufacturers, and 10 electronic instrument and imaging equipment producers. Their purpose was to compare traditional production systems with flexible high-performance production systems involving teams, training, and incentive pay systems. In all three industries, the plants utilizing high-involvement practices showed superior performance. In addition, workers in the high-involvement plants showed more positive attitudes, including trust, organizational commitment and intrinsic enjoyment of the work.[6] The concept has gained popularity as various studies have demonstrated links with productivity. It is often linked to the notion of employee voice and empowerment.[9]
[edit] Commitment
It has been routinely found that employee engagement scores account for as much as half of the variance in customer satisfaction scores. This translates into millions of dollars for companies if they can improve their scores. Studies have statistically demonstrated that engaged employees are more productive, more profitable, more customer-focused, safer, and less likely to leave their employer.
Employees with the highest level of commitment perform 20% better and are 87% less likely to leave the organization, which indicates that engagement is linked to organizational performance.[10] For example, at the beverage company of MolsonCoors, it was found that engaged employees were five times less likely than non-engaged employees to have a safety incident and seven times less likely to have a lost-time safety incident. In fact, the average cost of a safety incident for an engaged employee was $63, compared with an average of $392 for a non-engaged employee. Consequently, through strengthening employee engagement, the company saved $1,721,760 in safety costs in 2002. In addition, savings were found in sales performance teams through engagement. In 2005, for example, low-engagement teams were seen falling behind engaged teams, with a difference in performance-related costs of low- versus high-engagement teams totaling $2,104,823.3 (Lockwood).
[edit] Life insurance industry
Two studies of employees in the life insurance industry examined the impact of employee perceptions that they had the power to make decisions, sufficient knowledge and information to do the job effectively, and rewards for high performance. Both studies included large samples of employees (3,570 employees in 49 organizations and 4,828 employees in 92 organizations). In both studies, high-involvement management practices were positively associated with employee morale, employee retention, and firm financial performance.[6] Watson Wyatt found that high-commitment organizations (one with loyal and dedicated employees) out-performed those with low commitment by 47% in the 2000 study and by 200% in the 2002 study.[11]
[edit] Productivity
In a study of professional service firms, the Hay Group found that offices with engaged employees were up to 43% more productive.[12]
The most striking finding[citation needed] is the almost 52% gaps in operating incomes between companies with highly engaged employees and companies whose employees have low-engagement scores. High-engagement companies improved 19.2% while low-engagement companies declined 32.7% in operating income during the study period[citation needed]. For example, New Century Financial Corporation, a U.S. specialty mortgage banking company, found that account executives in the wholesale division who were actively disengaged produced 28% less revenue than their colleagues who were engaged. Furthermore, those not engaged generated 23% less revenue than their engaged counterparts. Engaged employees also outperformed the not engaged and actively disengaged employees in other divisions.[3]
[edit] Generating engagement
Commitment theories are rather based on creating conditions, under which the employee will feel compelled to work for an organization, whereas engagement theories aim to bring about a situation, where the employee by free choice has an intrinsic desire to work in the best interests of the organization. [13]
Recent research has focused on developing a better understanding of how variables such as quality of work relationships and values of the organization interact and their link to important work outcomes.[14] 84% of highly engaged employees believe they can positively impact the quality of their organization's products, compared with only 31 percent of the disengaged.[3] From the perspective of the employee, "outcomes" range from strong commitment to the isolation of oneself from the organization.[15] The study done by the Gallup Management Journal has shown that only 29% of employees are actively engaged in their jobs. Those "engaged" employees work with passion and feel a strong connection to their company. About ⅔ of the business units scoring above the median on employee engagement also scored above the median on performance.[6] Moreover, 54% of employees are not engaged meaning that they go through each workday putting time but no passion into their work. Only about ⅓ of companies below the median on employee engagement scored above the median on performance.[6]
Access to a reliable model enables organizations to conduct validation studies to establish the relationship of employee engagement to productivity/performance and other measures linked to effectiveness.[14]
It is an important principle of industrial and organizational psychology (i.e. the application of psychological theories, research methods, and intervention strategies involving workplace issues) that validation studies should be anchored in reliable scales (i.e. organized and related groups of items) and not simply focus on individual elements in isolation. To understand how high levels of employee engagement affect organizational performance/productivity it is important to have an a priori model that demonstrates how the scales interact.[16]
There is also overlap between this concept and those relating to well-being at work and the psychological contract.[6] Research by Gallup Consulting has shown a strong correlation between the degree of well-being of an individual and the extent to which they are engaged as an employee - high well-being yields high engagement. A well and engaged employee is likely to have less sick days, lowering the cost of lost productivity to their organization, and come to work energized and focused. A well and engaged employee is efficient and effective and a valuable asset in the workplace.
As employee productivity is clearly connected with employee engagement, creating an environment that encourages employee engagement is considered to be essential in the effective management of human capital.[15]
[edit] Drivers of Engagement
While it is possible to measure engagement itself through employee surveys, this does not assist in identifying areas for improvement within organisations. There are a range of factors, known as drivers, that are thought to increase overall engagement. By managing the drivers, an organisation can effectively manage engagement levels of its employees. Drivers such as communication, performance clarity and feedback, organisational culture, rewards and recognition, relationships with managers and peers, career development opportunities and knowledge of the organisation's goals and vision are some of the factors that facilitate employee engagement. Some points from the research are presented below:
* Employee perceptions of job importance - According to a 2006 study by Gerard Seijts and Dan Crim, "...an employees attitude toward the job's importance and the company had the greatest impact on loyalty and customer service than all other employee factors combined."[15]
* Employee clarity of job expectations - "If expectations are not clear and basic materials and equipment are not provided, negative emotions such as boredom or resentment may result, and the employee may then become focused on surviving more than thinking about how he can help the organization succeed."[7]
* Career advancement/improvement opportunities - "Plant supervisors and managers indicated that many plant improvements were being made outside the suggestion system, where employees initiated changes in order to reap the bonuses generated by the subsequent cost savings."[16]
* Regular feedback and dialogue with superiors - "Feedback is the key to giving employees a sense of where they’re going, but many organizations are remarkably bad at giving it."[7] "'What I really wanted to hear was 'Thanks. You did a good job.' But all my boss did was hand me a check.'"[12]
* Quality of working relationships with peers, superiors, and subordinates - "...if employees' relationship with their managers is fractured, then no amount of perks will persuade the employees to perform at top levels. Employee engagement is a direct reflection of how employees feel about their relationship with the boss."[15]
* Perceptions of the ethos and values of the organization - "'Inspiration and values' is the most important of the six drivers in our Engaged Performance model. Inspirational leadership is the ultimate perk. In its absence, [it] is unlikely to engage employees."[12]
* Effective Internal Employee Communications - which convey a clear description of "what's going on". "'If you accept that employees want to be involved in what they are doing then this trend is clear (from small businesses to large global organisations). The effect of poor internal communications is seen as its most destructive in global organisations which suffer from employee annexation - where the head office in one country is buoyant (since they are closest to the action, know what is going on, and are heavily engaged) but its annexes (who are furthest away from the action and know little about what is happening) are dis-engaged. In the worst case, employee annexation can be very destructive when the head office attributes the annex's low engagement to its poor performance… when its poor performance is really due to its poor communications.
* Reward to engage - Look at employee benefits and acknowledge the role of incentives. "An incentive to reward good work is a tried and test way of boosting staff morale and enhancing engagement." There are a range of tactics you can employ to ensure your incentive scheme hits the mark with your workforce such as: Setting realistic targets, selecting the right rewards for your incentive programme, communicating the scheme effectively and frequently, have lots of winners and reward all achievers, encouraging sustained effort, present awards publicly and evaluate the incentive scheme regularly. [17]
[edit] Potential red flags * Inappropriate use of Benchmark Data - some of the more well established Employee Engagement survey companies will state that the most important part of post survey follow up is related to comparison of internal survey data to numerous external benchmarks. This seems to have rubbed off onto internal sponsors who demand very specific benchmarks. Whilst some research analysts claim that the standard comparisons by industry sector are flawed others disagree. Is it right to compare a Bentley employee to one from Vauxhall (GM) because they are in the same automotive sector? The alternative argument is that both organisations would likely draw from similar worker pools and would as such wish to better understand expectations of workers in that industry and how they compare to competing employers. * A focus on data gathering rather than taking action may also damage engagement efforts. Organizations that survey their workforce without acting on the feedback appear to negatively impact engagement scores.[4] * According to the Conference Board and other recent studies, employee engagement has deteriorated significantly in the US and the UK over the last five years. Measuring and managing the wrong or incomplete set of engagement drivers is partly if not mostly to blame. Rigorous engagement measurement encompasses 15 attitudinal drivers formed by employee experiences. <reference ScarlettSurveys>

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Project Report on Employee Engagement

...PROJECT REPORT ON ACC LIMITED (SALES UNIT) NAGPUR EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT A Report Submitted to Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur University In Partial Fulfilment of the requirement of Master of Business Administration (MBA) Course Specialization in Finance & Human Resources Management Academic Session 2013- 14 Prepared by PRITI ASHOK MOHITE (Student Name) SARAN MAM Guided by ____________________________ (Guide’s Name) Tirpude Institute of Management Education Note : (Font : Times new Roman 14 – Regular for all text and for Subject Name, Student Name, Guide Name and College Name used Times New Roman – Size 14, Bold) Note : (Font : Times new Roman 14 – Regular for all text and for Subject Name, Student Name, Guide Name and College Name used Times New Roman – Size 14, Bold) Civil Lines, Sadar, Nagpur – 440001 Certificate This is to certify that Miss. PRITI ASHOK MOHITE is a bonafide student of Tirpude Institute of Management Education, Nagpur pursuing Master of Business Administration (MBA) course specialization in FINANCE & HUMAN RESOURCE Management during academic Session 2012-13. The candidate has worked under the supervision of SARAN MAM (Guide name) and has satisfactorily completed his / her project work in this academic session. The project submitted by him / her is his /her own work and is complete so as to warrant its presentation for examination. His / Her project work titled EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT (title of project) which is in partial......

Words: 11661 - Pages: 47

Free Essay

Employee Engagement

...NEW TRENDS IN EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT GROUP MEMBERS Tage Anga   PGP28362 Avinash K    PGP29001 Kaushik Jana            PGP29024 Sirisha Jayanthy       PGP29032 Sachin Waghe           PGP29034 Pritesh Dindor         PGP29039 Subhojit Majji         PGP29040 NEW TRENDS IN EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT Introduction Organizations are struggling to retain the best talent at work and are striving to create an emotional bond to their organization in the minds of the employees. But, for the employees, excitement might be getting diminished as there is no time and are rolling along the chain of busy life in office by attending conferences, meeting the targets, convincing the clients etc. Normal office routines during the day might slump under tremendous work pressure. Organizations who have consistent employee engagement activities keep their workforce unbelievably active. An engaged employee is a productive employee. There is a direct relationship between employee engagement and employee satisfaction, retention, motivation and above all, productivity. Employee engagement activities at office will always keep the employees refreshed and relaxed. Having fun at work will augment team building, bring togetherness, relieve stress and make the employee emotionally bonded to the organization and this will also have an effect on the attrition rates. Employee engagement activities are...

Words: 334 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Employee Engagement

...------------------------------------------------- Wiley (2012:2) identifies employee engagement as: 'The extent to which employees are motivated to contribute to organisational success, and are willing to apply discretionary effort to accomplishing tasks important to the achievement of organisational goals'. In contrast to this Swarnalatha and Prasanna (2013:52) claim that: 'Employee Engagement is a measurable degree of an employee's positive or negative emotional attachment to their job, colleagues and organisation that profoundly influences their willingness to learn and perform is at work'. This description opposes that engagement is distinctively diverse from employee motivation, organisational culture and employee satisfaction. The reality is that there is no one agreed definition of employee engagement as there are over 50 definitions that all have variations between them. Although recent reviews by researchers show that there is a similarity in the key components of the varied definitions, these common components that are acknowledged include employee association with organisational goals and a compliance to exert discretionary effort, commitment, enthusiasm for work and organisational pride (Schneider et al, 2009). In the recent years there has become a gradual interest in employee engagement. Firstly the reasons for this is the correlation with organisational performance. By improving employee engagement it can beneficial to companies in order to improves......

Words: 3268 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Employee Engagement

...be engaged at work? Employee engagement is not as simple as it sounds. Many believe that employee engagement simply means having happy employees. However it is a much more complex issue than just happy employees. As Kevin Kruse points out in his article about employee engagement, “Someone might be happy at work, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that they are working hard, productively on behalf of the organization.” (Kruse) Employee engagement is a hot word in the business world that has recently become very important in nearly every organization. Kruse notes that employee engagement is defined as “the emotional commitment an employee has to the organization and its goals.” (Kruse) An employee can be happy at work but if they are not fully engaged they then lack the commitment to go the extra mile to help the organization succeed. A fully engaged employee is more likely to put in extra hours and or overtime to help the organization achieve its goals. An engaged employee usually believes in the goals of the organization and will try their best to make sure that they organization achieves their goals. A disengaged employee can bring down employee morale within the entire organization, as well as negatively affect the organizations profits and reputation. There are a few examples of disengaged employees and how they affect they organization in a negative way. The first example is the employee that is happy at work but still not fully engaged, this employee will come to work......

Words: 1094 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Employee Engagement

...factors influenced whether you felt like digging right in, but one of the most significant was almost surely your boss. It seems obvious: Direct supervisors who set their teams up for success, observe them in action, ask for feedback, identify the root causes of employee concerns, and then follow through with meaningful improvements have happier, more engaged employees. Why, then, do senior executives who tout the value of employee engagement so often delegate it to the HR department? HR serves an important function, but not even the best HR staff is in a position to take the actions required to affect the attitudes of individual employees or teams. And employee engagement remains a challenge for companies worldwide. Recently, Bain & Company, in conjunction with Netsurvey, analyzed responses from 200,000 employees across 40 companies in 60 countries and found several troubling trends: Engagement scores decline with employee tenure, meaning that employees with the deepest knowledge of the company typically are the least engaged. Engagement scores decline as you go down the org chart, so highly engaged senior executives are likely to underestimate the discontent on the front lines. Engagement levels are lowest among sales and service employees, who have the most interactions with customers. Yet some companies manage to buck these trends. IT-hosting company Rackspace, for instance, has a mantra of “fanatical” customer support. Energized, motivated......

Words: 802 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Employee Engagement

...HR Best Practices: Employee Engagement When we make our checklist of the best organizations we aspire to work for, we often look at a big brand name, a challenging role or a fat salary as some of the parameters to judge the employer. With these fast changing times, employee engagement has become a powerful tool for employer branding. Organizations are focused on creating an engaged workforce not only to encourage higher employee productivity and retention but also attract better talent. So let us look at some of the best engagement practices followed today at some of the Top organizations and how they are impacting business. For a Cause Organizations believe that if employees are given the opportunity to give back to the society through volunteering, they tend to appreciate their jobs much more. The practice - Volunteerism has been part of the GE fabric since 1928. GE Volunteers is a global network that includes employees, retirees, affinity groups, friends and family sponsored by GE businesses and corporate resources. With more than 220 volunteer councils supporting projects ranging from tutoring to cleanups and ‘paint and fix’, this initiative has helped volunteer efforts to focus on health, education, environment and community building. The objective of this GE initiative is to provide ample opportunities to employees to engage in volunteerism as individuals or as groups. Inspiring trust and loyalty It has become predominant for employers to engage factory......

Words: 814 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Employee Engagement

...The Power of Employee Engagement As individuals we seek the things that make us happy in our lives. Society today seems to push our focus and desires from one thing to another, constantly giving the majority of people something to work for. Whether the incentive is promotion, raise, vacation, or even a paycheck, managers are always trying to make employee’s time in the workplace worthwhile. Well what if there was no incentive? What if employees just wanted to work for the best interest of the company? This is where the successful businesses set themselves apart from others. This human resource approach of getting to know your employees and what empowers them is an essential part in becoming an exceptional organization and employee engagement is the a major cause of their success. Employee engagement is defined as the property of the relationship between an organization and its employees. In any organization, the ones that strive the most are believed to have an extraordinary level of employee engagement. An employee who is fully vested into the company and is enthusiastic about working for it will result in a more positive contribution for the organizations credibility and success. When it comes to being a manager, coach, teacher or any figure with authority, one must identify the reason behind it. Many times we see individuals who are masters of their craft but aren’t fully engaged into the organization’s core values. According to the Gallup Business Journal, a...

Words: 1746 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Employee Engagement

...Pay structure in a company depends upon several factors. E.g… wage settlements. Labour market situation. Company’s nature and size. etc. Pay structure consists of certain grades. Scale and range of pay in each scale. Each scale has aminimun and a maximum limit. Jobs places within a particular grade carry the same value though the actual pay in a grade depends upon length of service and or performance of the employee. Pay structure in India generally consists of the following components. 1- Basic wage/salary 2-Dearness allowance (D.A.) and other allowances. 3- Bonus and other incentives. 4- fringe benefits or perquisites. Hard variables • Salary • Augmented pay- overtime, extra pay, one time stuff • Indirect pay –things needed for work, uniform allowance, etc. • Parks pay – discount on company’s products, etc. Soft variables • Opportunity for advancement • Opportunity for growth • Psychic income – doing personally meaningful work • Quality of life – workplace flexibility, work-life balance • The X-factor- special individual variables like bringing a dog to work. 1. Basic Wage The basic wage provides the foundation of pay pocket. It is a price for services renderd. It varies according to mental and physical requirements of the job as measured through job evaluation. In India, basic wage has been influences by statutory minimum wage, wage settlements, and awards of wage boards tribunals pay commissions, etc. (a) Minimum......

Words: 1336 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

The Four Secrets to Employee Engagement Summary

...The Four Secrets to Employee Engagement Summary The Four Secrets to Employee Engagement Summary This article discusses how to better engage employees in any company. It mentions how most supervisors set up the company for failure and disengaged employees by delegating the HR department to handle employee complaints or concerns. The best human resources staff is not set up to take the actions required to affect the attitudes of the employees or their teams. This being said direct supervisors should set up their own team for success. They should be the ones who do the leg work and face to face interactions. It is important for a supervisor to observe their employees in action and ask each employee for feedback. This allows the supervisors to get right to the root causes of employee concerns and enable them to make meaningful improvements. When supervisors invest in their employees, the employees in turn engage themselves more in their job since they are happier and more confident that if they have a problem their direct supervisor will be there to fix it. The article mentions how Bain & Company in conjunction with Netsurvey analyzed responses from 200,000 employees from 40 companies in 60 different countries found that: Engagement scores decline with employee tenure, meaning that employees with the deepest knowledge of the company typically are the least engaged. They also decline as you go down the organization chart, so highly engaged senior executives are......

Words: 422 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Employee Engagement

...towers, which total to 730 rooms, which is situated along the beach front. There are a variety of amenities such as: a spa, slot machines casino, four specialty restaurants, two grills, a main buffet dining area, seven bars (including a swim up bar), lavish pools with Jacuzzis and water slides, conference rooms that holds 2500 persons, banquet facilities, business center, private beach, tennis courts, gym and a night club. The majority of Sunset Jamaica Grande guests are from North America and Europe, which clearly identifies the hotel’s peak season to be in the winter. While training at SJG as a trainee manager in food and beverage, I have realized a breakdown in relationship development, employee feedback, employee motivation, poor accountability, employee recognition, and employee freedom and respect. The hotel went from having over 600 employees to a little over 300 within the one-year span that I have been there, as well as, guests’ occupancy drops from 100 percent to 60/80 percent within its peak season. A variety of marketing strategies were implemented to enhance the organization’s structure, without realizing that the real issues were the organization’s behaviors. Based on my observation and reviewing of monthly and quarterly reports from the human resource department, those occurrences were due to the abusing of authority, lack of respect for staff, and poor communication. There was a time when the food and beverage department was under-staffed, due to......

Words: 3274 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Employee Engagement

...2014, pp. 57–67 Employee Engagement Does Individual Personality Matter Meenakshi Handa and Aastha Gulati Abstract The purpose of the present study is to explore the relationship between personality and employee engagement amongst frontline personnel in the organized retail industry in India. In particular, the study seeks to examine the relationship between two personality traits, extraversion and conscientiousness with engagement amongst frontline employees. The Utrecht work engagement scale (2003) and Big Five Personality scale (McCrae and Costa, 1989) have been used for this purpose. Primary data was collected from 333 frontline employees working in different retail formats. The study finds that there is considerable scope for improvement in the level of employee engagement amongst the frontline personnel in the organized retail industry. There, however does exist a positive relationship between the extraversion and conscientiousness personality traits and employee engagement. Based on the findings, the paper recommends measures for improving employee engagement levels through a better fit between employee personality and the retail work environment. Keywords: Employee Engagement, Big Five Personality Traits, Extraversion, Conscientiousness, Retail Industry, India Human capital is a vital asset as it is employee effort and performance which finally determines business success. It is therefore important to understand the factors that impact employee motivation and......

Words: 2850 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Employee Engagement

...Employee Engagement September 20, 2014 This article discusses some very crucial information regarding employee engagement; but I will only discuss the most important parts. First, the article discusses the difference between employee engagement and job satisfaction; two very meaning topics that relate to one another but “are not synonymous” (Bliss, 2010, p. 3). Second, the article highlights the fact that there are numerous ways to define employee engagement, they all underline the employee’s behavior and commitment to the organization. Third, employee engagement plays a part in any business to help promote talent retention, foster customer loyalty, improve company performance and provide value for stakeholders (Bliss, 2010). Fourth, employee engagement involves the extent of work performance beyond what is required while at the company. Fifth, engaged employees tend to remain with the company because they wish to become a part of the company to help them achieve its organizational goals; become an advocate by referring friends and/or relatives to promote a positive work environment; and finally, they strive to put in the extra effort to contribute to company success (Bliss, 2010). Communication is another critical point to the success of any business and must involve everyone within the organization. The article discusses various methods to utilize depending on size and composition of the targeted group of employees (Bliss, 2010). All highlight the importance of......

Words: 979 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Employee Engagement

...[pic] Work-life balance, employee engagement and discretionary effort A review of the evidence March 2007 Literature review by Dr Mervyl McPherson of the EEO Trust. Extracts from this publication may be copied and quoted with acknowledgement. ISBN No: 0-9582233-4-3 Equal Employment Opportunities Trust PO Box 12929 Penrose Auckland New Zealand Phone: 64 9 525 3023 Fax: 64 9 525 7076 Table of Contents Preface 3 Executive summary 4 1.0 Introduction 6 2.0 Definitions and evidence of relationships 6 2.1 Work-life balance 6 2.1.1 Productivity 7 2.1.2 Relationship between work-life balance and productivity 8 2.2 Workplace/work-life culture 11 2.2.1 Relationship between work-life balance and workplace culture 12 2.3 Discretionary effort and employee engagement: going the extra mile 16 2.3.1 Relationship between discretionary effort/employee engagement and productivity/profitability 20 2.3.2 Relationship between work-life balance and discretionary effort 21 2.3.3 Relationship between workplace culture and discretionary effort 23 2.4 Summary of inter-relationships of key factors 24 3.0 Changing a workplace culture 26 3.1 Case studies of culture change 27 4.0 Conclusion 29 5.0 References 30 Preface Employee engagement has been identified as critical to competitive advantage in a labour market where skilled,......

Words: 10548 - Pages: 43

Premium Essay

Employee Engagement

...When employers don’t see eye to eye with their employees, the success of the company is on the line. The leaders of the corporation are in charge of making sure their employees are motivated to do their job. Why do employees stop becoming motivated at work? There are several reasons for this which mainly revolves around the relationships leaders have with their workers. Having a group of staff members not interested or excited about their company or job directly correlates to how well that company does. There are several different techniques that can help boost employee engagement at a company. When employees are engaged, they are more likely to satisfy their customers. Happy customers are the loyal customers. Employee incentives are monetary rewards given out to employees that earn it. This type of engagement has proved that worker’s motivation significantly increased when incentives were involved. Corporations have been known to not only offer individual incentives, but also group incentives. Individuals strive to learn new skills and dedicate their time in order to achieve their goal. In groups, team collaboration is at its best and everyone is making sure no one gets left behind. Because incentives drive workers to achieve their goal, this keeps employees focused on the goal of the company and its success. Some say that communication is the key to success. In the workforce, this is especially true. When managers and team members are not communicating properly, no one......

Words: 567 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Prepraing

...WPS05 Employee Engagement SIES College of Management Studies Working Paper Series The Working Paper Series would attempt to disseminate the findings of research in specific areas and also to facilitate discussions and sharing of perspectives and information about the identified areas. The papers carry the names of the authors and should be cited accordingly. The views, findings, and interpretations expressed in this paper are entirely those of the authors. They do not represent the views of SIESCOMS and its management. These working papers would be available online at www.siescoms.edu. No part of the paper can be reproduced in any form without the prior permission of the author. However, they can be quoted by citing the reference. 1 Working Paper 05/07 Employee Engagement Nitin Vazirani Dean in OB and HR SIES College of Management Studies Nerul nitin@siescoms.edu Abstract Employee engagement is the level of commitment and involvement an employee has towards their organization and its values. An engaged employee is aware of business context, and works with colleagues to improve performance within the job for the benefit of the organization. It is a positive attitude held by the employees towards the organization and its values. The paper focuses on how employee engagement is an antecedent of job involvement and what should company do to make the employees engaged. The paper also looks at the Gallup 12 point questionnaire, twelve-question survey that......

Words: 3947 - Pages: 16