Free Essay

Employer's Duty Care

In: Business and Management

Submitted By deda1968
Words 1166
Pages 5
Running Header: Video Assignment

Family Related Issues
Strayer University
Professor Whitney Davis, Esq.
LEG 500
29 January 2012

Explain if it matters that a parent literally had nothing to do with a biological child in order for the child to take advantage of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) to care for that parent. No, it does not matter if the parent was in the employee's life as long as it is the employee's parent then they are able to use FMLA. The type of relationship or lack thereof between a child and their biological parent has no bearing on whether an employee is eligible for FMLA. An employee can ask to use FMLA to care for a family member (whether they had nothing to do with them), for their own physical or mental health care and after the birth or adoption of a child. The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) provides an entitlement of up to 12 weeks of job protected and unpaid leave during any 12 month period to eligible covered employees and employers must grant eligible employees this right.
Explain whether the size of the business can have any effect on whether Tony is eligible for Family Leave under the FMLA. Yes, but not in the way Herman describes. Herman is trying to use business necessity as a reason to keep Tony from taking a family leave to help his ill father. The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) applies to a company if there are over 50 employees within 75 miles of the worksite, and at least 50 of the employees’ work 20 or more work a week in a current or preceding calendar year. If a company is a public agency, the employers are subject to provide FMLA regardless of the number of employees employed. All schools, private or public, are considered public agencies. Therefore, due to these facts, Tony is eligible for The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) because in the video, it mentioned that the small company he worked for had approximately 50 employees.
Explain whether Herman can or cannot imply that if Tony takes a leave of absence under the FMLA, he may not have a job when he returns. The answer is no for most employees. This is exactly the type of behavior that the act is designed to prevent. An important exception to the FMLA, however, allows the employer to avoid reinstatement of a key employee; defined as an employee whose pay falls within the top 10 percent of the firm's work force. If Tony qualifies as a key employee, then Herman may be within his legal rights by denying reinstatement to Tony when he returns.
Describe who is covered by the Family Leave and Medical Act (FMLA) of 1993. Basically, the FMLA defines who is eligible under the act and under what circumstances employees may take a leave of absence for family or medical purposes. Normally, it is not up to the employer to make this decision. The employer can attempt to make a reasonable determination about the veracity of an employee's reasons for taking a leave of absence under the act. The employer cannot, however, resort to coercive tactics, such as threats about the employee losing his or her job, to prevent the employee from taking the leave. The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) provide a means for employees to balance their work and family responsibilities by taking unpaid leave for certain reasons. The Act is intended to promote the stability and economic security of families as well as the nation's interest in preserving the integrity of families. The FMLA applies to any employer in the private sector who engages in commerce, or in any industry or activity affecting commerce, and who has 50 or more employees each working day during at least 20 calendar weeks in the current or preceding calendar year. The law covers all public agencies (state and local governments) and local education agencies (schools, whether public or private). These employers do not need to meet the 50 employee test. Title II of FMLA covers most federal employees, who are subject to regulations issued by the Office of Personnel Management. To be eligible for FMLA leave, an individual must; first, be employed by a covered employer and work at a company within 75 miles of which that employer employs at least 50 people; secondly, have worked at least 12 months (which do not have to be consecutive) for the employer; and lastly, have worked at least 1,250 hours during the 12 months immediately before the date FMLA leave begins.
Explain the extent to which an employer can make his or her own determination as to the eligibility of an employee under the Family Leave Act. Who is responsible for designating leave as leave eligible for the protection provided under the Family and Medical Leave Act? Simply stated, the employer has full responsibility for designating leave, whether it’s paid or unpaid; as FMLA qualifying leave, and for telling the employee. That doesn't mean, however, that the employer has the right to indiscriminately designate just any leave as FMLA leave. The reason for the time away must meet the requirements for eligibility under the Family and Medical Leave Act. The decision to designate leave as FMLA leave must be based entirely on information provided by the employee or the employee's spokesperson. In situations where the employee is incapacitated, the employee's spouse, adult child, parent, physician, or other person with authority to speak for the employee may provide information. Once an employer has sufficient information requesting paid leave for FMLA purposes, the employer must notify the employee that the leave will be counted as FMLA at the time the information is received or prior to the start of the leave. But, if the employer fails to provide such notice, the employer cannot retroactively designate any of the leave as FMLA. The employer may only designate any qualifying leave as FMLA after the employee is notified. However, the employee has full protection under the FMLA for any qualifying leave taken prior to being notified by the employer that it will be counted as FMLA leave. It is important to remember that the responsibility of designating qualifying leave as FMLA is totally the responsibility of the employer. If the employer knows that an employee is absent for an FMLA qualifying reason, the employer cannot deny the leave, nor fail to provide the protections under the FMLA guidelines to the employee, even though the employee has never asked for or asserted his or her rights. Even though an employer does not designate qualifying FMLA leave as such, an employee's rights under the FMLA are still protected.

REFERENCES
1. Halbert, Terry, & Ingulli, Elaine, Law and Ethics in the Business Environment, Cengage Learning, 2008.
2. Video: “Family Related Issues: Family and Medical Leave Act”
3. http://www.dol.gov/compliance/guide/fmla.htm.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Employer’s Duty of Care

...ordinary course of doing his or her job (Fleischer, 2004). Although the term “scope of employment” may have a broad definition, a reasonable third party would conclude that a service manger/auto mechanic would also check brakes, tires, etc., during a routine oil change. Therefore, performing these duties would fall within the ordinary course of doing his job, thus Jake’s actions are in scope of his employment. However, if Jake was at work, but not acting within the scope of his employment, his employer may be exempt from tort liability, and Jake would be unable to receive worker's compensation benefits if he is injured. Acting outside the scope of the job can include actions such as knowingly violating corporate policy. At other times, it can be less clear whether a person is acting within the scope of employment, and a judge or jury will be called upon to make the determination (Cushway, 2002). Explain whether or not Herman is responsible for Jake’s injury. Yes, Herman is responsible for Jake’s injury. An employer has a common law, duty to take reasonable care for the health and safety of his workforce. In addition to their common law duty of care, employers have a statutory duty, under section 2 of the Health & Safety at Work, etc Act 1974 (HASAWA), to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of their employees (Chandler, 2001). One could argue that the excess business created by the newly introduced free oil change offer...

Words: 904 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Employer's Duty of Care

...Employer’s Duty of Care Jamie Martinez Law, Ethics, and Corporate Governance Professor Boneita Campbell August 7, 2011 Introduction As employees, we are held to the same standard to act in good faith in whatever position we hold.   Employers also have that same duty to take care of the employees that perform the day to day tasks to make the company successful.   Whether it is through extra time off, increase in pay, or better benefits employers have an obligation to their employees.   Both the employer and employee have a common law duty of care to each other and to other employees. The relationship that employers have with their employee requires that duty of care is displayed by both parties. In addition the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 requires employers and employees to take reasonable care for the health and safety of everyone at work, including visitors and other non-employees who use the premises. Explain whether Jake’s actions are in or out of his “scope of employment” Accepting a position in an organization means that you have signed an agreement to form a relationship with your employer. The employee is expected to be loyal, obedient, and carry out the duties that he has agreed to perform as stated a contract that would have been signed at the time of hiring. Employees are required to be honest to their employers and must work to the best of their abilities. The employee is supposed to be following all lawful and clearly given command of his employer...

Words: 1422 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Employer's Duty of Care

...Employer’s Duty of Care Course Title: Law, Ethics, and Corporate Governance – LEG 500 November 9, 2011 Q1: Explain whether Jake’s actions are in or out of “his scope of employment”. Jake’s actions to fully inspect vehicles were in his scope of employment, even though the main service requested was for an oil change. It is the responsibility of a certified mechanic to ensure a car is inspected for any major damages and preventative care maintenance. Just like when an individual goes to the doctor for a particular problem or illness. The nurses and doctors still perform the normal routine by checking an individual’s blood pressure, temperature, pulse count, heart beat, weight and height to confirm the basics are functioning properly and not contributing to the issue for which you are visiting the office and provide preventative care. The same concept can be applied to a routine oil change service and the need to check other basic functionality and mechanics of car to prevent any future major issues. Bureau Labor Statics, U.S. Department of Labor (2010) states the following: During routine service inspections, technicians test and lubricate engines and other major components. Sometimes, technicians repair or replace worn parts before they cause breakdowns or damage to vehicle. Technicians usually follow a checklist to ensure that they examine every critical part. Belts, hoses, plugs, brakes, fuel system and other potentially ...

Words: 1133 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Employer's Duty of Care

...Employer’s Duty of Care To what extent are employees required to perform their job with a duty of care? We all know that corporate officers have a duty of care to the corporation that they are employed by. They have an obligation to perform their duties with the care that a person in a like position would reasonably exercise under similar circumstances (Halbert & Ingulli, 2010, p 52). As a fellow employee down on the totem pole, we are held to the same standard to act in good faith in whatever position that we hold. Our employers also have that same duty to take care of the employees that perform the day to day tasks to make the company successful. Whether it is through extra time off, increase in pay, or better benefits employers have an obligation to their employees. The relationship that employers have with their employee requires that duty of care is displayed by both parties. 1. Explain whether Jake’s actions are in or out of “his scope of employment.” In the video Jake, the service manager, provided a basic inspection of the cars along with the oil change. While the promotion only required a free oil change the inspection was within his scope of employment. Scope of employment refers to anything a person does in the ordinary course of doing his or her job (“Scope of Employment”). Generally, an act will be considered part of an employee’s employment if it is committed while he or she is performing services for the company or incident to the provision...

Words: 1035 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Employer’s Duty of Care

...Abstract. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported on October 21, 2010 that “The total recordable nonfatal occupational injury and illness incidence rate among private industry employers declined in 2009 to 3.6 cases per 100 workers--its lowest level since 2003” (www.bls.gov). That is great indication that workplaces became much safer. It should be a mutual effort by employees and employers to keep workplace safe and secure. “Duty of care is a legal obligation imposed on an individual requiring that they adhere to a standard of reasonable care while performing any acts that could foreseeably harm others”(en.wikipedia.org).”The duty of care may be imposed by operation of law between individuals with no current direct relationship (familial or contractual or otherwise), but eventually become related in some manner, as defined by common law (meaning case law). Duty of care may be considered a formalization of the social contract, the implicit responsibilities held by individuals towards others within society. It is not a requirement that a duty of care be defined by law, though it will often develop through the jurisprudence of common law”(en.wikipedia.org). 1. Explain whether Jake’s actions are in or out of “his scope of employment.” Scope of employment is defined in dictionary.law.com as an “actions of an employee which further the business of the employer and are not personal business, which becomes the test as to whether an employer is liable for damages due to such actions...

Words: 1247 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Employer's Duty of Care

...Employer’s Duty of Care LaShawn A. Dunkins Professor Augustine Weekly LEG 500 – Law, Ethics, and Corporate Governance February 7, 2012 In order for a business to be successful an employer and employee should have an understanding relationship. The relationship between the two is of the utmost importance. The employee is supposed to follow the laws of the company or that the employer has made known once they have decided to accept a position with the company. The employee is bound by rules and regulations in their place of work and is liable for a penalty or punishment in case of violation of any kind. The employer is bound to tolerate certain conditions or the workplace and interact with the employees. The employer should be very clear as to what action he wants to be taken and how they should be performed. In a business there should be a bond between the managerial skills of the employer and the perfect knowledge of the employee to better maintain the business and prosperity. Both the employer and employee should perform their part of the duty in the best interest of the business and attract more customers. The Scope of Employment is the actions taken by the employee to further the business of the employee. These actions sometimes pose the question as to whether or not an employer is liable for any damage or harm that occurs during working hours of the business. Explain whether Jake’s actions are in or out of “his scope of employment”. According to...

Words: 906 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Employer’s Duty of Care

...Employer’s Duty of Care Law, Ethics, and Corporate Governance Strayer University Aug 6, 2011 1. Explain whether Jake’s actions are in or out of “his scope of employment.” 2. Explain whether or not Herman is responsible for Jake’s injury. 3. Explain whether or not Jake should be paid the overtime. 4. Explain the rights Jake and Herman have individually in this scenario Table of Content Jake’s scope of employment……………………………..........................Page 4 Is Herman responsible for Jake’s injury?………...................................Page 6 In or out of “his scope of employment…………………………………..Page 6 overtime…………………………………………………………………...Page 7 Overtime…………………………..………………………………………Page 8 References ………………………………………………………………...Page 9 Jake’s scope of employment The relationship between the employer and employees determines the success of a business to a great extent. The employee owes his loyalty and obedience to his employer. He has to be honest to his employer and must give his best in his work as he is bound by the contract he would have signed at the time of his appointment. The employee is supposed to be following all lawful and clearly given command of his employer and any deviation or dereliction of duty is punishable under law as well. So the employee is bound by rules and regulations at his work place and is liable for a penalty or punishment in case of violation of any kind. On the other hand the employer is also bound to abide by...

Words: 1609 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Employer’s Duty of Care

...Employer’s Duty of Care Law, Ethics, and Corporate Governance – LEG 500 Wednesday February 16th 2011 1. Explain whether Jake’s actions are in or out of “his scope of employment.” Working ethically and being compatible with each other in a company is very fundamental in the development of the business. The managers and the employees have to develop a relationship where they agree on a form of understanding within their different levels of the organization and reason out what is needed to better the sales of the company. The employers are the head of the employees; therefore, their subordinates need to obey the instructions that are given to them to carry out their work. Employers should constantly give clear instructions to the employees of the duty that needs to be carried out and the time frame of which it should be done. The employees on the other hand, with the knowledge of what is ethical and what will be beneficial for the company, has the right to discuss with the managers what should be done. Therefore, both parties need to look at ways that will attract more customers on a longer basis. In this scenario, Jake went against the orders from his manager by not only doing the free oil change but by fixing other parts of the cars. His thought behind his actions was to draw more customers to the company because of the extra deals which surprisingly came with the promotion. Doing the job well and offering a bit more than expecting, makes the customers happy and will...

Words: 1304 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Employer's Duty of Care

...EMPLOYER’S DUTY OF CARE Strayer University LEG 500 – Law, Ethics, and Corporate Governance February 20, 2011 1. Explain whether Jake’s actions are in or out of “his scope of employment” The actions of Jake’s work on the vehicles that include checking breaks, tires, and the transmissions is included within his scope of employment. The scope of employment includes any tasks that are included in the contract of the position that an individual is hired to complete (USLegal). This also includes any specific task that an employer asks an employee to perform. The purpose of documenting an individual’s scope of employment is for the employer to be responsible for a liability that may occur in case of an injury to that individual. The scope of employment can also be used to help benefit the employer as well. If an employee is not performing within their scope, the employer is not responsible for the actions of the employee. The position of Jake’s employment is that of Service Manager. Herman did give Jake specific instructions to change the oil no matter what is wrong with any of the vehicles. However, Jake is there to service vehicles. As long as he is performing duties that include servicing vehicles and furthering the business of the company then he is performing within his scope of employment. It is expected of a mechanic to perform other tasks of servicing a vehicle other than just changing the oil. Even if an employee is doing something that they are not directed to do by...

Words: 1592 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Employer's Duty of Care

...in Herman’s automobile dealership. When Herman decided to offer free oil changes to lure potential buyers onto the car lot, Jake was tasked with performing the oil changes. As manager of the automotive department, it is within his scope of employment to perform the oil changes. However, part of this issue was that Jake was performing more than the basic oil changes. He f elt responsible for performing more thorough inspections such as checking the tires, brakes, and transmissions because he is a certified auto mechanic. These duties are also within his scope of employment because he was performing tasks associated along with his job in good faith in an effort to benefit the employer as well as provide the duty of loyalty and care he owes to customers as a certified mechanic. Employer Responsibility for Injuries Because Jake was working within the scope of his employment and was injured by performing duties related to the job, Jake’s employer Herman is liable for his injury even though he was not directly responsible for it. Workers compensation was implemented in the United States between 1911-1925 (Halbert & Ingulli, 2010). It was designed to...

Words: 1038 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Employer's Duty of Care and Issues of Compensatio

...Employer's Duty of Care and Issues of Compensation 1. Explain whether Jake’s actions are in or out of “his scope of employment Jakes actions are within the scope of his employment as manager servicing. Being a manager, Jake is responsible for the end to end and orderly running of his department, including meeting the outputs expected and he cannot take shelter under ‘being overworked’. He has to plan his departmental functioning in a manner to cause minimum disruptions for meeting the business objectives of Herman. It is possible he has been working overtime which might have resulted in fatigue, lower level of alertness and possibly leading to his injury. Holding a managerial position, his age cannot be an excuse for not being able to discharge his responsibilities, though it might have contributed to his injury from impediments to free movement due to arthritis. The ensuing constrained movement would have contributed to his injury. Jake cannot blame Herman for his predicament arising possibly out of his own lack of care. This is all the more so as he is in a managerial cadre and expected to mentor, manage and guide those under his control. His reaction to Herman’s call will only send out a wrong signal to Herman, and his own colleagues and juniors. Jake cannot ask for overtime being a manager and has to carry out his responsibilities coming under the purview of servicing (oil change) that is within his scope of responsibility. Jake can possibly engage with Herman...

Words: 1158 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Assignment #3 – Employer’s Duty of Care

...Herman informed Jake that the way he was changing the oil was to prepare the cars for the Indy 500 and that he wanted him to do a lousy job. Herman also informed him that what he learned while receiving his auto mechanic certification is for aircraft mechanics and not car mechanics. In the video while they were having the conversation about the way Jake was performing his job, his thumb was bleeding. Herman seemed not to care about the fact that Jake was injured and just wanted him to continue to perform his job to make the company have more business. Jake became more irate because Herman seemed not to care about the fact that Jake’s thumb was bleeding Jake took it upon himself to decide to go to the doctor because Herman wanted him to keep changing the oil despite of the situation. Jake had every right to choose to go to the doctor instead of staying to change the oil on cars. It is not fair that Herman would hang Jake’s job over his head because he is not working as fast as Herman thinks that he should and he also has an injury that Herman does not seem to care about. Explain whether or not Herman is responsible for Jake’s injury. It is important that from the conversation that Herman had with Jake, Herman requires Jake to work long hours for the promotion that Rally Motors is running. Jake is not...

Words: 1244 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Negligence Case Study

...contributory negligence 2. voluntary assumption of risk. Contributory negligence Contributory negligence occurs when a plaintiff fails to meet the standard of care required of them for their own protection—this being a contributory cause, with the defendant’s conduct, of the plaintiff’s injury. Contributory negligence is really the plaintiff’s failure to avoid harm caused by the defendant’s conduct (for example, a pedestrian steps onto the street without looking and is hit by a speeding car). The position is that when contributory negligence is present, responsibility for the injury will be apportioned between the plaintiff and defendant, according to their respective degrees of responsibility. The Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) now allows a court to reduce a plaintiff’s damages by 100%. Voluntary assumption of the risk of harm The plaintiff consents to or voluntarily assumes the risk of injury....

Words: 2239 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Law of Torts

...identification to the tort of negligence, a tort that emerged as of primary importance as per the landmark decision in the House of Lords in Donoghue v Stevenson (1932) AC 562.) and statutory provisions of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (WA) which have been enacted to either clarify or modify the common law rules that determine liability for negligence. As a broadly conceived scope, the underlying principle of negligence is that a defendant may be liable in a wide range of circumstances for failure to take reasonable care which causes harm to a plaintiff’ protected interests. Now, wrongful or careless behaviour is not always actionable in negligence. The defendant will only be liable if the plaintiff can prove that three essential requirements are satisfied: Three essential requirements that must be satisfied in order to establish liability in negligence: (a) That the defendant owed the plaintiff a duty of care * Pre – existing relationship will create a duty of care. OR * “Neighbour principle” from Donoghue v Stevenson- Reasonable foreseeability test, and * Salient Features If pure economic loss (negligence misstatement framework): extra criteria required * Reliance criteria: * Reliance? – Did the defendant know or ought to have known that they were being relied upon * Was it reasonable for the plaintiff to rely on the statement made * Was there actual...

Words: 1916 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Davis V. the Board of County Commissioners of Dana Ana County

...Davis v. the Board of County Commissioners of Dana Ana County Patty Turner Dr. John Loblack HRM510 Business Employment Law 11/01/2012 Davis v. the Board of County Commissioners of Dana Ana County This case explores the fundamental legal issue of negligent referrals or misrepresentations of facts that an employer provides regarding a previous employee. Questions for the court to evaluate regarding the matter are: What if provided references are misleading? Can an employer be sued for exercising negligence in referring an unfit employee who harms or show foreseeable possibilities of causing harm on a new job? Who bestows the duty of care? What was the legal issue in this case? The legal issue in the case of Davis v the Board of County Commissioners of Doña Ana County involved the misrepresenting of referral information of a previous employee, Joseph Herrera. Herrera was a detention officer at the Dona Ana County Detention Center who was disciplined for having improper sexual interaction with female prison inmates. In spite of these unprofessional issues, Herrera’s supervisor, Frank Steele, gave him an outstanding reference; a reference that helped him secure another position at another institution. In addition to Steele’s excellent letter of reference, Herrera received a positive verbal recommendation from another supervisor, Mochen. Unfortunately, Herrera did not live up to the positive referrals he received from...

Words: 995 - Pages: 4