Free Essay

English Teaching

In: English and Literature

Submitted By 5426508
Words 5825
Pages 24
Incidental and Intentional Learning JAN H. HULSTIJN

1 Introduction There are two popular views on what it means to learn a second language. One view holds that it means months and even years of “intentional” study, involving the deliberate committing to memory of thousands of words (their meaning, sound, and spelling) and dozens of grammar rules. The other, complementary, view holds that much of the burden of intentional learning can be taken off the shoulders of the language learner by processes of “incidental” learning, involving the “picking up” of words and structures, simply by engaging in a variety of communicative activities, in particular reading and listening activities, during which the learner's attention is focused on the meaning rather than on the form of language. These popular views on intentional and incidental learning reflect, at best, only partially the ways in which these terms have been and are being used in the academic literature. Some empirical researchers attribute to them only a specific methodological meaning, in the context of laboratory-type learning experiments. Apart from this methodological sense, incidental and intentional learning have been given various interpretations, sometimes indistinguishable from two more widely used terms, namely implicit and explicit learning, respectively. There are virtually no experimental L2 grammar learning studies which are explicitly presented as “intentional” learning studies, and only a handful which are explicitly presented as studies on “incidental” learning. There is a vast literature, however, of empirical studies in incidental and intentional vocabulary learning. These empirical studies reflect a wide variety of theoretical and educational/pedagogic research questions; they, therefore, do not constitute a coherent research domain, as will become apparent in this chapter. The first aim of this chapter is to present the various ways in which the terms “incidental learning” and “intentional learning” are used in the psychological literature (section 2) and in the literature on L2 learning (section 3). The second aim is to give an overview of the empirical literature, in particular of the L2 vocabulary literature (section 4), as there are hardly any empirical studies on incidental and none on intentional L2 grammar learning (section 3.2). As the empirical literature on L2 vocabulary learning is so vast, and as the research questions differ so widely, section 4 confines itself to a number of illustrative examples. In section 5 follows a discussion of two pertinent methodological issues concerning the use of pre-tests and post-tests in incidental and intentional vocabulary learning studies. The chapter is concluded with some remarks concerning the diversity of issues addressed in it and the prospects of the labels “incidental learning” and “intentional learning” being used in the SLA field (section 6). Readers interested in the various meanings of incidental and intentional learning are advised to turn to section 3; readers interested in vocabulary learning may find section 4 most worthy of their attention, while methodologically oriented readers may be most interested in sections 2.2, 2.4, and 5. Boxes 12.1 and 12.2 give two examples of empirical research. The first study (Horst, Cobb, and Meara, 1998) illustrates how incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading can be investigated; the second study (Griffin and Harley, 1996) illustrates how an intentional design was used in a controlled study to investigate the role of various factors in learning a list of L2 words.1 These markedly contrasting studies are summarized in the boxes, and features not relevant in the present context have been omitted. 2. Incidental and Intentional Learning in the Psychological Literature In this section, the notions of incidental and intentional learning are traced back to their roots in psychology. First the rise of incidental and intentional learning is described in the era of stimulus- response psychology. This is followed by a methodological subsection, characterizing so-called Type I and Type II designs in experiments involving incidental and intentional learning. Then the fall and subsequent resurrection of incidental and intentional learning are described in the era of cognitive psychology. In the last subsection, the notion of transfer-appropriate processing, important for a proper understanding of learning experiments, is highlighted. 2.1 The origin of the notions of incidental and intentional learning in stimulus-response psychology According to early twentieth-century American psychologists such as James, Dewey, Watson, and Thorndike, learning is the forming of associations between sense impressions (stimuli – S) and impulses to action (responses – R). S-R psychologists distinguished various types of associative learning, ranging from elementary to complex (Gagné, 1965), but all involving the four basic concepts of stimulus, response, feedback, and conditioning. The most elementary form of learning is signal learning, requiring the making of a general, diffuse response to a stimulus (e.g., producing tears at the sight of onions). The next form in the learning hierarchy is stimulus-response learning (proper), requiring the making of a precise response to a discriminated stimulus. Learning L1-L2 word pairs is an example of stimulus-response learning. Sometimes, however, new words are learned through a series of S-R connections (so-called chains; more particularly, verbal chains, called verbal associations), as, for instance, when an English learner of French learns the L2 response allumette to the L1 stimulus match through the mediation of the English word illuminate and the word part lum, establishing the verbal chain match-illuminate-lum-allumette.2 According to psychologists at the time, an important determinant of the formation of associations (in human learning) is the apparent preparedness or state of readiness on the part of the learner, commonly referred to as set, intent, or motivation (Gibson, 1941; Postman and Senders, 1946; Underwood and Schulz, 1960). For many years, approximately from 1940 to 1965, psychologists tried to develop a theory of learning set, intent, or motivation.3 However, because of the difficulty of finding a satisfactory operationalization, researchers began to approach the concept merely in terms of the presence or absence of an explicit instruction to learn. The critical feature in this operationalization is whether or not (in incidental and intentional learning, respectively) participants are told in advance that they will be tested. Box 12.1 Incidental learning (Horst et al., 1998) Main research questions: i. Does reading a simplified novel lead to increased word knowledge? ii. Are words that occur more frequently in the text more likely to be learned? iii. Are words that occur more frequently in the language at large more likely to be learned? iv. Do learners with larger vocabulary sizes learn more words? Methodology: This was a one-group pre-test-treatment-post-test study of incidental L2 vocabulary learning. Subjects: 34 low-intermediate ESL learners in Oman (two intact classes), taking a reading course in preparation for the Cambridge Preliminary English Test. Task: The teachers read aloud a simplified version of Thomas Hardy's The Mayor of Casterbridge (109 pages; 21,232 words), while learners followed along in their books. This required six sessions, over a ten-day period. With the reading-aloud and reading-along procedure all subjects were exposed to the entire text, while creating “the circumstances for incidental acquisition by precluding opportunities for intentional learning” (p. 211). Students “appeared to be absorbed by the story of secret love, dissolution and remorse, and tears were shed for the mayor when he met his lonely death at the end” (p. 211). Students were pre-tested (about a week before the reading session commenced) and post-tested on their knowledge of 45 words of low and middle frequency levels, occurring between 2 and 17 times in the text. It was assumed that the one-week time lapse “would allow the items to be forgotten to the extent that they would not be immediately recognized as testing points when they were encountered in the story. This seems to have been effective; in a discussion held after the post-test, students were surprised to learn that the tested words had occurred repeatedly in The Mayor of Casterbridge. Their response also suggests that any word learning that occurred was implicit and incidental” (p. 213). Results: Mean vocabulary scores were 21.6 and 26.3 (out of 45) in pre- and post-test respectively (t [33] = 5.81; p < 0.05). Conclusions: Concerning the first research question, the authors conclude that these findings “offer conclusive evidence that small but substantial amounts of incidental vocabulary learning can occur as a result of reading a simplified novel” (p. 214), but also that “the power of incidental L2 vocabulary learning may have been overestimated” (p. 220). Concerning the three remaining research questions, sizable word gains are reported (i) when words occurred eight times in the text, (ii) when words (nouns) referred to concrete concepts, and (iii) when readers’ vocabulary size was at the (intermediate) 2000 level. Box 12.2 Intentional learning (Griffin and Harley, 1996) Research question: Is it more effective to learn word pairs in L1-L2 order or vice versa? This practical general question was broken down into the following sub-questions: i. Given a word pair A-B, is the association between the two components of the word pair bi- directional? ii. If it is bi-directional, is the forward association, A-B, stronger than the backward association, B-A? Is A more likely to lead to the recall of B than vice versa? (Use of forward association means being tested in the same direction as learning. Use of backward association means being tested in the opposite direction.) iii. Given that one component is familiar and the other is unfamiliar, is it more effective to learn the familiar-unfamiliar association (L1-L2) or the unfamiliar-familiar association (L2-L1)? iv. Is production or comprehension the easier task? (Production and comprehension in this context mean, respectively, giving an L2 item in response to an L1 item cue and giving an L1 item in response to an L2 item cue, irrespective of the direction of learning.) v. Does the direction of learning have an effect on remembering over time? One possibility considered was that, although the French-English bond might appear to be easier to establish, the English-French bond might be stronger over time, due to the initial difficulty of learning and its lack of list dependence. Methodology: Subjects: 47 and 63 students from two high schools in Britain, between 11 and 13 years of age, after six months of learning French. Task: Students were given 20 word pairs to learn, printed on a single sheet of paper. The instructions avoided the word “list” since the test would have the words in a different order from the original. Students were told that they would have eight minutes to learn the word pairs, that they would then hand back their papers and receive a written test. The test forms contained 20 words (either the English or French members of the learned word pairs); students had to write down the other member of each pair (cued recall). No instruction was given on either the learning technique or the mode of testing. In each school, four groups were formed. The arrangement of experimental groups is shown in table 12.1. Table 12.1 Arrangement of groups

The experiment adopted a 2 × 2 × 4 design, with two between-subject factors and one within- subjects factor. The between-subject factors were (i) use of forward or backward association at testing, and (ii) direction of learning (English-French or French-English). The within-subjects factor was time; students were tested four times: immediately after the learning session (day 1), as well as 3, 7, and 28 days later. No pre-test was administered. None of the French items had been encountered by students in their studies prior to the experiment, and students were not exposed to these words during the following 28 days. In order to answer the five research questions, performance of students in the following groups was compared: Research questions i and ii: comparison between groups 1 and 2 and groups 3 and 4. Research question iii: comparison between groups 1 and 3 and groups 2 and 4. Research question iv: comparison between groups 1 and 4 and groups 2 and 3. Research question v: a possible interaction between direction of learning and ability to recall over time. Results: The four groups of school B performed consistently lower than the groups of school A (grand means of 29 percent and 47 percent respectively of words correctly recalled). For simplicity's sake, only performance of school A groups will be reported here. For details, see the original study: Question i: The association was bi-directional: contra behaviorist claims, learning in one direction did not preclude performance in the opposite direction (37 percent in group 3 against 30 percent in group 4). Question ii: Forward association was stronger than backward association (60 percent mean scores in groups 1 and 2 against 34 percent in groups 3 and 4). Question iii: Direction of learning did not have a significant effect (45 percent mean scores for English-French learners in groups 1 and 3 and 48 percent for French-English learners in groups 2 and 4). Thus, there is nothing inherently more difficult about learning in the L1-L2 than in the L2-L1 direction. Question iv: Comprehension scores (52 percent in groups 2 and 3) were significantly higher than production scores (41 percent in groups 1 and 4). Question v: Performance on day 1 (53 percent) was significantly better than performance on day 3 (45 percent), day 7 (46 percent), and day 28 (43 percent). However, there was no significant interaction between language order at learning and day of testing. The English- French bond and the French-English bond decayed at much the same rate. Conclusion: The L1-L2 learning condition is, on balance, “the more versatile direction for learning when both production and comprehension are required” (p. 453). 2.2 Experimental operationalization of incidental and intentional learning: Type I and Type II designs In the heyday of S-R psychology, many studies were conducted to investigate the effect of a variety of manipulations of the stimulus materials, as well as of some learner variables such as age4. Two experimental methods were employed. The between-group Type I design is characteristic of the earlier studies. Participants in the incidental condition perform an orienting task on the stimulus materials, but they are given no instructions to learn and they are unexpectedly given a retention test afterwards. Participants in the intentional conditions are told in advance that they will later be tested. Early research aimed at demonstrating (i) that incidental learning did indeed exist and (ii) that intentional learning was superior to incidental learning. In the within-group Type II design, which was adopted in most later studies, all participants are instructed to learn some of the stimuli presented to them; but additional stimuli, which participants are not told to learn, are presented at the same time. Retention of the additional stimuli is unexpectedly tested afterwards. Thus, in the Type II design participants are their own controls, serving under both intentional and incidental conditions of learning, being exposed to two categories of stimuli, while expecting to be tested on only one of these. The additional stimuli in the Type II design may be either intrinsic or extrinsic, as illustrated with the following two hypothetical examples: Example 1, illustrating the use of intrinsic additional stimuli The stimulus materials contain target words, which are printed either in bold face or in italics and in either red or blue (yielding a 2 × 2 design of stimulus form). The orienting task focuses participants’ attention on color (instruction: “Try to remember which words appeared in red and which ones in blue”). Afterwards, participants are tested on their recall of red and blue words (intentional learning). But, unexpectedly, they are also requested to tell which words originally appeared in bold face and in italics (incidental learning). In this experimental design, the additional stimuli (typefaces) are said to be intrinsic because they belong to the same entities to which the attended stimuli (colors) belong. Example 2, illustrating the use of extrinsic additional stimuli The stimulus materials consist of a list of words some of which are printed in capitals and some in lower case. The orienting task focuses participants’ attention on the words in capitals (instruction: “Try to remember the capitalized words”). Afterwards, participants are tested on their recall of both capitalized (intentional) and lower-case words (incidental). The lower-case stimuli are said to be extrinsic to the experimenter-defined learning task, as they do not embody features of the attended stimuli. 2.3 Incidental and intentional learning in cognitive psychology With the decline of S-R psychology and the advent of cognitive psychology in the 1960s and 1970s, marking a fundamental paradigm shift, psychologists lost interest in the concept of set or intention as a central construct in the explanation of human learning and memory performance. This would have meant the demise of the constructs of incidental and intentional learning had not the work of some cognitive psychologists in the 1970s saved them from oblivion, not for theoretical but mainly for methodological reasons. Researchers of information processing and memory (the labels that replaced learning, which was felt to be associated too much with S-R psychology) in the 1970s, unearthed the Type II incidental learning design because it appeared to serve as an excellent tool in the investigation of the effect of various types of information processing on long-term information retention. For instance, in a seminal paper, Hyde and Jenkins (1973) presented groups of participants with a number of words and asked each group to perform a different orienting task. Participants were not told in advance that they would be later tested on their recall of the words. Jenkins and Hyde demonstrated that retention on the unexpected test fluctuated with orienting task. For instance, retention scores of participants who had rated the words as to their pleasantness or unpleasantness on a five-point scale (a semantic orienting task) were much higher than those of participants who had to record the part of speech of the words (a non-semantic orienting task).5 This and similar studies led Craik and Lockhart (1972) to propose their levels-of-processing theory, which engendered a lively theoretical debate and a great number of empirical investigations using incidental and (to a much lesser extent) intentional learning designs for many years to come (for a review, see Baddeley, 1997, ch. 7). It is through these studies that the notions of incidental and intentional learning have survived to the present day. For contemporary psychologists, their value is based on their record as research tools, rather than on their theoretical substance. In conclusion, incidental and intentional learning refer, strictly speaking, only to the absence or presence of an announcement to participants in a psychological experiment as to whether they will be tested after the experimental task. Thus, in the incidental case, the experiment may not even be explicitly presented as a “learning experiment,” because the word “learning” itself may already lead to testing expectancies among participants and hence to subject-generated information-processing strategies unwanted by the experimenter. In other words, incidental learning has acquired the status of a tool in the cognitive psychologist's experimental research kit to investigate some way or ways of information processing as intended by the investigator, not contaminated by ways of information processing not intended by the investigator. The presence or absence of an intention to learn does not figure as a theoretical construct in any current theory of human cognition. 2.4 Transfer-appropriate learning and the crucial role of the orienting task Retention or criterial tasks to be performed after a learning phase may be compatible, incompatible, or neutral to the processing mode of the previous learning task. In connection with this phenomenon of (in)compatibility between learning and retention task, Bransford, Franks, Morris, and Stein (1979) introduced the notion of transfer appropriateness. Bransford and his associates (Morris, Bransford, and Franks, 1977) found an interaction between encoding processes (semantic and non-semantic learning tasks) and the product of retrieval processes (semantic and non-semantic retention tasks). Participants who had been administered compatible learning and retention tasks (semantic-semantic, or non-semantic-non-semantic) achieved higher retention scores than participants who were given incompatible learning and retention tasks (semantic-non-semantic, or non-semantic-semantic). The lesson to be learned here is that an accurate assessment of intentional and incidental learning experiments requires a joint consideration of learning and retention task (Eysenck, 1982, p. 225).6 This can be illustrated with the study in box 12.2 (Griffin and Harley, 1996). In this intentional learning experiment, participants had to learn and memorize L2 words, which were paired to their L1 equivalents in either the L1-L2 productive order or in the L2-L1 receptive order. At test, the order was either the same as (productive-productive or receptive-receptive) or different from (productive- receptive or receptive-productive) the order during learning. It was found that retention scores on a same-order test were substantially higher than retention scores on a different-order test. The notion of transfer appropriateness may help to illustrate the difference between incidental and intentional learning. For example, as participants in an intentional vocabulary learning task are told in advance that they will be tested after the learning phase, they will try to store the word information that is to be learned in a form perceived as transferable to the test situation; and processing instructions during the learning phase in an incidental learning setting may or may not be conducive to successful transfer to the test situation. For instance, participants in an incidental learning vocabulary learning experiment who are instructed to pay attention to the meaning of some new words which appear in a reading text are likely to perform much better on an unexpected receptive post-test than on an unexpected productive post-test. The notion of transfer appropriateness also underscores the crucial importance of the orienting task given in a (Type I) learning study, because the orienting task is the instrument with which the researcher can control or manipulate participants’ attention to the information to be learned, and attention is a necessary condition for noticing and learning (Robinson, this volume; Schmidt, 2001).7 3. Incidental and Intentional Learning in the L2 Learning Literature This section will address the question of how incidental and intentional learning figure in the literature on L2 learning. As the field of L2 learning is fragmented into rather isolated sub-domains with little cross-talk, it comes as no surprise that the notions of incidental and intentional learning appear prominently in one domain but not at all in another. Incidental and intentional learning mainly figure in the area of vocabulary (including spelling). They do not appear at all in the areas of phonetics and phonology, however, and only exceptionally in the area of grammar (morphology and syntax).8 The reason why the term “intentional learning” does figure in the vocabulary learning literature but hardly in the literature on grammar learning, whereas “incidental” figures in both literatures, is that “incidental,” in principle, can apply to abstract as well as to factual declarative knowledge, whereas “intentional” appears to be applicable to factual knowledge only, as will be explained below in section 3.5.9 3.1 Weak theoretical interpretations of incidental learning Incidental learning has often been rather loosely interpreted in common terms, not firmly rooted in a particular theory. It could therefore be said to have several theoretical meanings, in the weak sense. From Schmidt (1994a) three definitions can be derived: i. The most general meaning is couched in negative terms as learning without the intent to learn (p. 16). ii. Another interpretation is that it refers to the learning of one stimulus aspect while paying attention to another stimulus aspect. As Schmidt (1994a, p. 16) puts it, incidental learning is “learning of one thing (...) when the learner's primary objective is to do something else (...).” This meaning of incidental clearly shows its descent from the methodological meaning, mentioned in section 2.1. iii. A slightly more specific interpretation of incidental learning is that it refers to the learning of formal features through a focus of attention on semantic features. Again, in the words of Schmidt (1994a, p. 16), but now with the previously omitted parenthetical phrases included: incidental learning is “learning of one thing (e.g., grammar) when the learner's primary objective is to do something else (e.g., communicate).” Recently, Gass (1999) suggested a new, extended meaning for incidental learning as the learning of grammatical structures without exposure to instances of these structures. She refers to two studies on the acquisition of relative clauses (Eckman, Bell, and Nelson, 1988; Gass, 1982) in which learners were exposed to some but not all types of relative clauses and appeared to have learned not only the structures presented to them but also, “incidentally,” the structures not presented in the input but implied by the ones that were presented. Thus, in addition to the distinction made in section 2.2 between intrinsic and extrinsic additional stimuli, and somewhat stretching the traditional notion of stimulus, one could even postulate a third category of implied, but not presented, and therefore not attended-to, stimuli. Most L2 learning researchers use incidental learning in connection with the learning of vocabulary through reading.10 As section 4.1 will show, it is widely believed that most people in literate societies enlarge their vocabularies through reading, focusing on the meaning of words and texts, rather than through the conscious, intentional memorization of lists of word forms and their meanings. A typical and well-known proponent of this view is Krashen (1989), who, in the context of his Input Hypothesis, argues that we acquire vocabulary and spelling through exposure to comprehensible input. 3.2 Empirical studies on incidental L2 grammar learning In many empirical L2 grammar-learning studies, participants are exposed to L2 data under various experimentally manipulated conditions, without being told that these data represent instances of some feature (principle or rule) of the L2 grammar and that the investigator's aim is to assess the extent to which participants are able to acquire this feature under the experimental conditions. It could be argued that, methodologically speaking, these studies are concerned with incidental learning. For example, in a well-known experiment, Doughty (1991) studied the acquisition of different kinds of English relative clauses by adult ESL learners. The study adopted a between- subjects design that included two experimental groups (and a control group, not relevant in the present context). Participants in one experimental group received meaning-oriented instruction; participants in the other experimental group received rule-oriented instruction. Neither experimental group was told in advance that they would be tested afterwards on their acquisition of various types of relative clauses. Thus, from a methodological perspective, both experimental groups can be called incidental groups. However, as the use of the term “incidental learning” would not have had a theoretically relevant meaning in this study, Doughty, understandably, found no reason to use this term.11 Only three experimental L2 grammar-learning studies appear to have explicitly used the term “incidental,” but none of them pitted incidental against intentional learning. The first study (Hulstijn, 1989) involved three experimental groups (Form, Meaning, and Form and Meaning). Theoretically, the study is presented as one of implicit learning, meaning that learners were not consciously aware of the grammatical target features under investigation. Methodologically, the study is presented as an incidental learning study: “Ss were not informed about the research questions until after the completion of the last test, and, while carrying out a current task, did not know whether a subsequent test would follow” (p. 54). The second and third studies (reported, respectively, in Robinson 1996a, 1996b, 1997) involved four experimental conditions: Implicit, Incidental, Explicit Rule Search, and Explicit Instruction (in the 1996 study), and Implicit, Incidental, Enhanced, and Instructed (in the 1997 study). The implicit and incidental conditions were alike “in not requiring a conscious focus on the grammatical form of the stimuli presented during training. In the implicit condition the task instruction is to memorize sentences, whereas in the incidental condition the task instruction is to read the sentences and understand their meaning” (Robinson, 1996b, p. 35). Robinson, who motivates his use of the term “incidental” by a reference to Paradis (1994, p. 394), whose definition will be quoted in section 3.4, appears to use “incidental” to refer to learning of L2 forms through a focus of attention on meaning, as in the third definition mentioned in section 3.1. In summary, although some definitions of incidental L2 grammar learning have been proposed in the literature (in particular, Gass, 1999; Schmidt, 1994a), no reports of empirical L2 grammar learning studies have so far been published which explicitly base themselves on the Schmidt or Gass definitions. This is quite understandable, as the notion of implicit learning has had a greater appeal among SLA researchers than the notion of incidental learning (see section 3.4; DeKeyser, this volume; Doughty, this volume).12 3.3 The meaning of “intentional” in the vocabulary-learning literature In the literature on vocabulary learning, when used at all, “intentional learning” is commonly given a cognitive interpretation, as the rehearsal and memorizing techniques invoked by learners when they have the explicit intention of learning and retaining lexical information (Schmitt, 1997). 3.4 The differences between incidental and implicit and between intentional and explicit types of learning For many authors, incidental and intentional learning overlap with, or even become indistinguishable from, implicit and explicit learning respectively. There are several interpretations of the terms “implicit” and “explicit” learning (see DeKeyser, this volume). The most characteristic feature, however, distinguishing implicit from explicit learning is the absence or presence of “conscious operations” (N. Ellis, 1994, p. 1), a notion also referred to as the absence or presence of “awareness at the point of learning” (Schmidt, 1994a, p. 20). Note that none of the definitions of incidental and intentional listed in section 3.1 is synonymous with the definitions of implicit and explicit learning given by Ellis and Schmidt. In line with Schmidt (1994a), it is recommended here that the distinctions between incidental and implicit and between intentional and explicit should be maintained. Paradis (1994, p. 394), for instance, distinguishes incidental from implicit in the following definition of implicit competence, which “is acquired incidentally (i.e., by not focusing attention on what is being internalized, as in acquiring the form while focusing on the meaning), stored implicitly (i.e., not available to conscious awareness), and used automatically (i.e., without conscious control).” Thus, incidental learning, in all the definitions listed in section 3.1, is always implicated in implicit learning; implicit learning thus entails more than what is meant by incidental learning. In a similar vein, it is recommended here that a distinction be maintained between intentional and explicit learning. Whereas explicit learning involves awareness at the point of learning (e.g., by trying to understand what the function of a certain language form is), intentional learning involves a deliberate attempt to commit new information to memory (e.g., by applying rehearsal and/or mnemonic techniques). 3.5 Confusions concerning the interaction of the what and how of incidental and intentional learning The nagging problem in discussions concerning incidental and intentional (as well as implicit and explicit) learning is that, although the definitions of these terms appear to refer to the how of learning (learning mechanisms), their interpretations depend on authors’ views on the what of learning (the representation of knowledge in the mind/brain).13 For instance, it is relatively easy to imagine the intentional learning of a list of L2 words, as these form-meaning connections are readily conceived of as instances of declarative, factual knowledge. However, as soon as we define the what of learning as abstract knowledge of properties of L2 grammar (e.g., knowledge of the L2 setting of the pro-drop parameter), it is almost impossible to conceive of the acquisition of this abstract grammatical feature taking place through intentional learning. It is much easier, it seems, to conceive of the acquisition of this feature taking place through implicit, and hence through incidental learning (see section 3.4). This and similar interactions between the what and how of L2 learning have caused, and continue to cause, confusions in the L2 learning literature.14 It comes as no surprise, therefore, that the area in which “incidental” and “intentional” are used most frequently is that of vocabulary learning. Vocabulary knowledge can easily be conceived of as a type of declarative knowledge, and it is declarative knowledge which can be learned intentionally (e.g., with various memory aids) as well as incidentally (e.g., through reading and listening). It can be concluded that incidental and intentional learning are differentially important for different classes of target language features: whereas incidental is used in connection with the learning of both abstract and factual knowledge, the use of intentional is restricted to the learning of factual knowledge. When used in connection with factual knowledge, incidental and intentional learning in the realm of language (e.g., learning vocabulary items, writing systems, spelling rules, conventions for addressing people in oral or written discourse according to their age, sex, and status) does not appear to differ from incidental and intentional learning in other walks of life (e.g., learning geographical names, historical events). 3.6 The issue of two poles on a continuum as opposed to two distinct categories Should incidental and intentional learning be thought of as two distinct learning processes or as poles on a continuum? There is no simple answer to this question. As Schmidt (1994a, 1994b) has argued, there is no learning without attention and noticing. This is true not only for implicit but also for incidental learning. Incidental and intentional share the involvement of attention and noticing (see the quotation from Paradis, 1994, p. 394, in section 3.4). Thus, in the dimension of attention and noticing, incidental and intentional do not form two distinct categories. However, this still leaves open possibilities of distinct processes in other dimensions. As was mentioned and illustrated in section 3.2, incidental and intentional are not juxtaposed to each other in the L2 grammar-learning literature. The polarity issue, therefore, does not seem to play a role in the domain of grammar learning. In the L2 vocabulary-learning literature, however, incidental and intentional learning are seen as distinct categories, in that intentional learning does, and incidental does not, imply the use of deliberate retention techniques. In conclusion, on the one hand, both incidental and intentional learning require some attention and noticing. On the other hand, however, attention is deliberately directed to committing new information to memory in the case of intentional learning, whereas the involvement of attention is not deliberately geared toward an articulated learning goal in the case of incidental learning.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

English Teaching

...Contemporary Online Language Education Journal, 2011, 1, 33-40. Classroom roles of English language teachers: The traditional and the innovative İngiliz dili öğretmenlerinin sınıfiçi rolleri: Geleneksel ve yenilikçi Anindya Syam Choudhury 1 Abstract This paper looks at the classroom roles of English language teachers in the second language/ foreign language context with particular reference to the Indian one. In the beginning, it considers the notion of „role‟ in English Language Teaching (ELT) and how different practitioners and methodologists have conceptualized the roles played by teachers. This is followed by an analysis of the characteristics of the traditional roles of teachers in a teacher-centred classroom in which the teacher becomes someone like the Greek Titan, Atlas, bearing the burden of the whole class on his or her shoulders. It is shown that this sort of unilateral and unidirectional pedagogy fails to nurture the resourcefulness of learners and is, in fact, detrimental to the development of his or her personality. The paper then goes on to highlight the important aspects of the alternative, innovative paradigm in which the focus is on the learner and the role of the teacher is basically that of a „facilitator‟. Keywords: English Language Teaching, role, facilitator, teacher-centred, pedagogy Özet Bu çalışmada yabancı dil bağlamında ikinci dil olarak İngilizce öğretmekte olan öğretmenlerin sınıfiçi rollerine özellikle Hindistan bağlamında bakılmaktadır....

Words: 2938 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Project Work in Teaching English

...Introduction The theme of the course paper is “Project Work in Teaching English”. The objectives of the paper are to highlight the importance of project work in teaching English, to describe its main peculiarities and types, to discover how it influences the students during the educational process and if it helps to learn the language. The problem of using project work in teaching English is of great importance. Project work is characterized as one of the most effective methods of teaching and learning a foreign language through research and communication, different types of this method allow us to use it in all the spheres of the educational process. It involves multi-skill activities which focus on a theme of interest rather than of specific language tasks and helps the students to develop their imagination and creativity. Nevertheless, teachers are not keen on the idea of providing project work into their lessons because of the disadvantages this method has. The main idea of project work is considered to be based on teaching students through research activities and stimulating their personal interest. The research topic of the course paper is the process of teaching and learning a foreign language with the help of project work. The research focus of the paper is the content of project work activities. The research tasks are set as follows: to describe the principal characteristics of project work, to identify the types of projects and to......

Words: 10774 - Pages: 44

Free Essay

Mass Media in Teaching English

...English and the Mass Media G.O.Almakhova Магистрант 1 курс Евразийский национальный университет им. Л.Н. Гумилева Астана, Казахстан Abstract Ағылшын тілі - халықаралық тіл. Ақпараттық ғасырда жетістікке жеткісі келетін адамдар үшін ағылшын тілін білу керемет артықшылық болып табылады. Және ағылшын тілін жетік меңгеруде бұқаралық ақпарат құралдарын қолдану жақсы нәтижеге жеткізеді. Бұл мақалада ағылшын тілін үйретуде бұқаралық ақпарат құралдарын қолданудың маңыздылығы мен артықшылықтары сөз етіледі. Английский язык является международным языком, знание которого предоставляет неотъемлемую возможность людям, которые хотят преуспеть в современном информационном веке. А использование средств массовой информации в обучении английскому языкому способствует достижению высокого уровня овладения языком. В данной статъе рассматриваютя важность и преимущества применение средств массовой информации в обучении английскому языку. English is an international language, the knowledge of which represents a great advantage for people who want to succeed in the New Media Age. And the use of mass media in learning English will definitely lead to mastering English. This present article focuses on the importance and benefits of teaching English through mass media. Key words: Mass media, teaching English, information, LSRW skills The mass media play an active part in every society around the world. This has had a big influence on people's lifestyles, ways of behaving and...

Words: 1796 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Teaching English as a Second Language to Pre-School Learners

...Title: Teaching Methods used to teach English to pre- school children’s Date | Author/ References | Title of Journal | Comments | Research method | 18/09/2012 | Sandradu Plessis and Brenda low | Challenges To Pre –School Teachers In Learners Acquisition Of English As Language Of Learning And Teaching | This journal highlights problems that teachers might come across in teaching English to pre –school children. The importance of identifying them and solving them because its believed here in this journal that preschool teachers play a key role in the acquisition of English language by the children because children spend most of their waking hour with the teachers. Therefore it’s believed that teachers do play a big role in the children’s life in order for them to acquire the language | Quantitative research method | 19/09/2012 | Karen E Johnson | The Relationship Between Teachers Believe And Practises During Literacy Instruction For Non –Native Speakers Of English | In this journal it is discussed teachers theoretical believe helps them to perceive, process, and act upon information in classroom. This also study extends the current research on teachers' theoretical beliefs within literacy contexts to the field of teaching English as a second language (ESL).Specifically, it examines the relationship between ESL teachers' theoretical beliefs about second-language learning and teaching and their instructional practice during literacy instruction with non-native speakers......

Words: 1256 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Teaching English Language and Literature in Socio-Linguistic Context

...PADMASHREE DR. D. Y. PATIL ARTS , COMMERCE AND SCIENCE COLLEGE, PIMPRI, PUNE 18 M.A. PART 2 SEM 3 PAPER 2 ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE TEACHING PROJECT TOPIC: “TEACHING ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE IN SOCIO-LINGUISTIC CONTEXT” SUBMITTED BY: GAURAV .N. SHIMPI CHECKED BY: PROF. DIPTI PETHE YEAR : 2012 -2013 INDEX Introduction Aims and Objectives Meaning and Nature of Language English Language and Literature in India Role of Language in Teaching Literature Sociolinguistic Contest in Learning and Teaching English Language Conclusion Bibliography INTRODUCTION Sociolinguistics is the descriptive study of the effect of any and all aspects of society, including cultural norms, expectations, and context, on the way language is used, and the effects of language use on society. Sociolinguistics differs from sociology of language in that the focus of sociolinguistics is the effect of the society on the language, while the latter's focus is on the language's effect on the society. Sociolinguistics overlaps to a considerable degree with pragmatics. It is historically closely related to linguistic anthropology and the distinction between the two fields has even been questioned recently. It also studies how language varieties differ between groups separated by certain social variables, e.g., ethnicity, religion, status, gender, level of education, age, etc., and how creation......

Words: 4944 - Pages: 20

Premium Essay

The Importance Of Teaching English

...Since many years Saudi students and people in general started to have an Interest in learning languages especially English.The reason for this is due Saudi government noteworthy interest in teaching foreign languages. 40 years ago Saudi Introduced teaching English to the curriculum because of the importance of learning languages in the development of the country and spreading Islam,as result of this interest in teaching English,Applied linguistic (AL)was one of the majors Saudi students began to learn later on. There were Various reasons behind Saudis studying AL, to my knowledge,one is the purpose for teaching in higher education.In the present time Saudis studying AL or English related majors in local universities and international universities...

Words: 932 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The Study of Micro Teaching

...Micro Teaching” A Paper As a partial fulfillment of the course of Master of Arts {part-II} in English, Evaluation of the paper IV.II: ELLT By Sharad N. Musale Roll.No-518 Submitted To The department of English R.N.C. Arts, J.D.B. Commerce & N.S.C. Science College, Nashik Road. 2012-2013 Content Introduction I) Meaning and Definition of Micro Teaching II) Nature of Micro Teaching III) Characteristics of Micro Teaching IV) Objectives of Micro Teaching V) Steps in Micro Teaching VI) Advantages and Limitations of Micro Teaching Conclusion Bibliography Introduction The paper is entitled as ‘A Study of Micro Teaching’. This paper is divided into six sections. The first two sections describe the meaning and nature of micro teaching. While the third and fourth section gives an account of its objectives and characteristics. The fifth section tells about steps in micro teaching. Finally the sixth section describes advantages and limitations of of micro teaching. Meaning and Definition of Micro Teaching “Micro teaching was developed by Dwight Allen and Robert Bush, in “Teacher Preparation” Programme at Stanford University between 1960 and 1960. Today, it has become one of the most important developments in the field of teaching practice in several countries. Micro teaching is an...

Words: 1259 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Authority Figure Versus Authority Model Teaching Styles

...Adam George English 1010 Authority figure versus Authority Model Teaching Styles Any teacher who has ever taught in a classroom setting will quickly say their style of teaching is different from other teachers. A good teacher knows that it is very common for a class of students to be at a variety of levels in any particular subject and that all students do not learn in the same way. In order to be effective, teachers will definitely need to use different teaching methods to reach all their students. Having different teaching styles is very important for teachers to adapt to their students’ learning abilities. The two most popular teaching styles used by teachers today are the authority figure and the authority model. One of the most popular and widely used teaching styles is that of an authority figure. This teaching style puts the teacher as the center of attention and all the students must focus on the teacher. A formal authority teaching style tends to focus on content. This style is generally teacher-centered, where the teacher feels responsible for providing and controlling the flow of the content and the student is expected to receive the content. All information received by the students will be handled quickly by the teacher. The teacher will often maintain control of the class by using a loud voice or some other type of attention-getting-tactic such as not speaking until the class is quiet. This style of teaching only produces short-term results with......

Words: 626 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Reading Ability

...Reading competence Hedge (1990) as cited by Yah Awg Nik et.al,(****)agrees that reading and exposure to language help students to improve their writing performance. The authors also agreed with the Ministry of Education of New Zealand (2004) that a student who is familiar or has a mastery of a topic, can eventually produce a proficient and effective writing output. However, there are students who are poor in reading which results to failure in correcting and monitoring their writing output. The study made by Yah Awg Nik et.al (****) concludes that extensive exposure to English Language has enhanced the writing performance after they had given different instruments and being assessed. This is in accordance with Hedge’s (1990) argument that exposure and reading extensively are beneficial to effective writing skills. They also added that writing maybe difficult and demanding but frequent exposure in reading and writing will help improve writing performance. Intelligence Farris in Garnace (2006) admits that thinking and language are related to each other and their development occurs at the same time. Learners that have proficiency in speaking, listening, reading and writing can deal effectively with the tasks that have something to do with the thinking strategies. Motivation Factors The studies of Bandura, (1986); Ellis, Lenz, & Sabornie, (1987); Paris & Winograd, (1990); Wong, (1994) asserts that students with writing problems frequently are unmotivated because...

Words: 1045 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Assignment C

...TIFFANY SEACE 10/07/14 EDU 737 Assignment 5C 1. • “Differentiated instruction is not about adjusting your teaching to meet the needs of children receiving special education. It’s about meeting the needs of everyone in your class- regardless of their individual situation.” i. This idea was also seen in the UDL video. The idea is to adapt the curriculum instruction to the needs of the class, rather than the other way around. This allows every student to access information, become engaged, and be challenged appropriately. It is important to push those who are talented or gifted, or continue to push those who understand certain topics already, as well as be nurturing to those who are struggling or have specific disabilities. In order to have a classroom that meets this standard, I will be sure to learn as much as I can about the students (from the students themselves) in the beginning of the school year. • “Differentiated instruction is about giving students multiple options for taking in information and making sense of ideas.” i. All students learn differently. Even those who seem to pick up information quickly, or paced with the curriculum, obtain information in different ways from each other. In order to nurture these different ways of obtaining skills and information, we need to give students different ways to explore what we are teaching. In my classroom, I would give the instruction of the ideas, but then allow practice of skills, or exploration of......

Words: 807 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Criminology

...Pre-Course Work Q1. Describe what your role, responsibilities and boundaries would be as a teacher / tutor in terms of the teaching / training cycle. Note - FENTO (The standards body before LLUK) described the teaching cycle as follows for each group of students:- a. Assessing the learners needs b. Planning and preparing teaching and learning programmes for groups and individuals c. Developing and using a range of teaching and learning techniques Managing the learning process d. Providing the learners with support e. Assessing the outcomes of learning and learners achievements f. Reflecting upon and evaluating one’s own performance and planning future practice g. Meeting professional requirements. A1. A tutor is responsible for all of the above aspects: * Pre –Course be aware of the level of knowledge, experience and competence of the candidates * Planning and preparation of the course. Aims and objectives must be met, how long the course is, the information to be taught and how it will be assessed. * Different teaching styles to meet the needs of the candidates as different styles suit some better than others and be prepared to adapt. * Management of the process be prepared to adapt training to fit the needs of the delegates, confirm knowledge throughout with assessments. * Tutor support throughout the course; be prepared to give help and guidance to the individuals. Question and answer sessions, what maybe......

Words: 704 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Fs 2 Episode 4

...------------------------------------------------- Episode 4 ------------------------------------------------- Guiding Principles in the Selection and Use of Teaching Strategies * ------------------------------------------------- My Target In this episode, I must be able to * Write evidence of the application of some guiding principles in the selection and use of teaching strategies. * ------------------------------------------------- My Performance (how will be I rated) Field study 2, Episode 1 – principles of learning Focused on: Application of the principles of learning in the teaching- learning process | Task | Exemplary (4) | Superior (3) | Satisfactory(2) | Unsatisfactory(1) | Observation/ Documentation | All task were done with outstanding quality; work exceeds expectation | All or nearly all task were done with high quality | Nearly all task were done with acceptable quality | Fewer than half of task were done; or most objectives met but with poor quality | My Analysis | -Analysis questions were answered completely; in depth answers; thoroughly grounded on theories-Exemplary grammar and spelling. | -Analysis questions were answered completely-Clear connection with theories -Grammar and spelling are superior | -Analysis question were not answered completely-Vaguely related to the theories-Grammar and spelling acceptable | -Analysis questions were not answered-Grammar and spelling unsatisfactory | My Reflection |......

Words: 966 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

E-Learning System

...INTRODUCTION Each study needs to specify the different problem occurs in all situations in which, researchers came up with the objectives on how the different problems provide a solution. This chapter specifies the statement of the problem, current state of technology, objectives, the scope and limitation of the study and the project rationale. 1.1 Statement of the Problem 1.1.1 General Problem The main problem of the study is how to develop an Online E-Learning System for Evada Phone Inc. that will also provide Technology Enhanced Resource Materials (TRMs) for ESL tutors. 1.1.2 Specific Problems Specifically, the developer aims to answer the following problems: 1.1.2.1 How will the developed system maintain the following: modules, levels, examination, teacher, student, user and class schedule? The developed system will provide a maintenance module for the following: modules, levels, examination, teacher, student, user and class schedule. 1.1.2.2 How will the developed system secure vital information from unauthorized users? The developed system will provide a security module that ensures efficient system security with username and password maintained in a secured database. 1.1.2.3 How will the developed system automatically compute for the student’s performance? The developed system will provide a transaction module for the automatic computation of student grades based on their performance. 1.1.2.4 How will the developed system assign teacher to......

Words: 1253 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Teacher Philosophy Statement

...Teaching Philosophy Statement I am not yet a teacher but have had a strong desire to be one ever since I was a child. I recall playing with my sisters and I loved playing the role as a teacher. I grew up in a bilingual environment. As a child I knew how to speak and read Spanish but, I was lacking grammar skills. I wanted to know my home language fluently in all aspects. Therefore, I want to facilitate my future students to be able to learn a second language. My drive is to pursue a higher education to my students that way they could become successful life. I am going to act like a guide to them and promoting respect to all my students. It is my life aspiration to be an excellent high school teacher who motivates students to achieve the highest level of education. Not only I am pushing myself but also, I want to be a teacher to push my students to excellence. Perseverance is my motto, and I want to pass that on to my students. I want them to see my example: I’ve worked hard and never once gave up on what I wanted to become –their teacher. I believe that my role as a teacher is to give my students the tools necessary to be successful. In order to accomplish this goal, I will find ways to teach each student based on their needs that way all my students will feel capable and successful. Another way that I would help my students is by incorporate themes, projects, group work, to make my students active learners. I want to inspire Spanish and English speakers to ascertain......

Words: 893 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Proficiency Standards

...Proficiency Standards Stephanie R. Gilkinson Grand Canyon University: ESL:223N Professor McDonnel Proficiency Standards | Standard | Common Core Standard | Activity | Listening and Speaking | Standard 1: Listening and Speaking are Communication SkillsStudents will listen, speak, read, and write in English for information and understanding. Students will be able to use the basic listening strategies to use effectively and meaningfully. | SL.K.1: Students will be able to participate in collaborative conversations with peers to continue a conversation through multiple exchanges. | Throughout the day, the students will be able to use their vocabulary words by greeting one another either at their lockers or in the classrooms. Students will be able to express their feelings, thoughts, and ideas clearly. Students will be able to discuss what they would like to do over the weekend or during classroom time. | Reading | Standard 3: Reading-Comprehending TextThe students will be able to analyze text for expression, enjoyment, and response to other related content areas. The student wills be able to participate in teacher guided discussions about the title, cover, illustrations, and text. | RL.K.6: With prompting and support, the students will be able to name the author, illustrator of a story and discuss illustrations. | At circle time, the students will be prompted to discuss what the cover is about by looking the illustrations and reading some of the text of the......

Words: 746 - Pages: 3