Free Essay

Enron

In: Business and Management

Submitted By awalega
Words 3760
Pages 16
Today, as we look around the world, we see an increase in the number of corporations; as capitalism has spiraled to a peak. While corporation’s products and services are needs and wants of the economy, their moral actions, or lack there of, are not, however, directly or indirectly affect us each day. Are corporations people? Can corporations be considered moral? Questions such as these have been raised by Shaw and Barry in the text Moral Issues in Business. While the answers to these questions are debatable, the infamous Enron Corporation shows us that while the people make up the company, the company as a whole receives the reputation of being immoral or unethical. We consider Kenneth L. Lay and Jeffery Skilling, the former president and CEO of Enron, the driving forces behind Enron’s bogus success and responsible for the moral code that should have been set for the organization. These unethical actions Enron took part in even had support by auditor, Arthur Anderson, and attorneys, Vinson & Elkin. The top leaders of Enron had a passion for capitalism, which drove the company to illegal and unethical behaviors, eventually leading to the catastrophic fall of the company. However, in order for Enron to deceive as long as they did without being caught, a lot of their actions were actually legal, but immoral. Enron’s use of mark-to market (MTM) accounting and taking advantage of energy deregulation in California, led to their “profit at all costs” mentality, legal, moral, or otherwise.
Jeff Skilling and top executives failed to make decisions from the standpoint of the longevity of the company. Instead, executives utilized tactics that brought short-term success to the company, which later resulted in the downfall of the company. Skilling was only concerned about maximizing profit at all cost. When he first joined Enron, he incorporated the mark to market accounting method, which brought about short-term happiness.
The decision to use MTM accounting allowed the company to publish inflated profits, thus causing their stock prices to increase because it “appeared” to the public that Enron was growing at such a fast pace; no other energy company could compete. He institutionalized this ideology throughout the company by incorporating methods such as the performance review committee. This accounting approach was the beginning of many bad tactics used by the top Enron executives to cover actual profits and hide from the public its later revealed billion dollar deficits. Mark to Market accounting allows companies to post the current market value of an asset or liability before the gains or losses of the asset or liability have been recognized. It was created with the intention of allowing Futures Brokers to record anticipated assets. Enron used MTM as a way to record expected revenues for projects in an effort to overstate profits. Even though this accounting method is legal, it leaves much room for interpretation because the value of the expected revenues may not have been properly analyzed, for which Arthur Anderson was responsible
The auditors of Arthur Anderson were unethical from the consequentialist viewpoint. The cover up of fraud on the financial statements overstated the wellbeing of the firm by escalating its revenues. Simultaneously, the act harmed a great number of investors and employees who bought Enron stock for pension funds. But, the consequentialist theory is only one framework of many.
The deontological theory views the ethical behavior at Enron from a different perspective. Deontological ethics postulates that devotion to the duty recognized by social relationships as a moral obligation. When applying deontological theories to Enron one needs to assess the general duties of the managers and the auditors arising from their relationships to the firm and its stakeholders. The managers and external auditors of Enron had the general duties to all stakeholders in society to avoid deliberately harming others and to make reparations in the event they caused damage. The managers had an implied fiduciary duty to the shareholders of the organization based on their terms of employment, to carry out operations in a method that does not cause harm to the firm. The auditors also had a general duty to evade harm to the public and an explicit duty to evade harming the shareholders of firms employing the services of the auditors.
From the Utilitarian point of view, “happiness is the only thing that is good in and of itself”. Had this been the viewpoint from which executives of Enron stood, the scandal would have never happened. “For Utilitarians, then, justice is not an independent moral standard, distinct from their general principle. Rather the maximization of happiness ultimately determines what is just and unjust.” According to John Stuart Mills, justice was the name for certain classes of moral rules, and these moral rules included forbidding humans to hurt one another. According to Shaw and Barry: “What utilitarianism identifies as rights are certain moral rules, the observance of which is of the utmost importance for the long-run, overall maximization of happiness” (Shaw and Barry 109).
Enron’s manipulation of California’s energy grids is another example of Enron acting immoral while maintaining the legality of an action. Enron was one of the main leaders of the deregulation movement. Regulation of energy utilities was put in place when the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 was passed as a result of the utility holding companies contributing to the 1929 stock market crash. Keynesian economic theories called for a tightening of the reins on free marketers and saved capitalism. Enron contributed millions of dollars to state and federal politicians to help push their movement. Since then, many private utilities pushed for deregulation. Once the government control was lifted, Enron was able to manipulate the market to earn a high profit. They created artificial power shortages, and raised their prices (Pha, 2002).
Manipulating the market not only increased revenue for Enron, but for the traders as well. The senior leadership of Enron was driven by profits and encouraged traders to do whatever they could to increase stock prices. West Coast Traders made over $2 billion for Enron by betting energy prices; traders had the inside scope because Enron was one of the companies manipulating the energy, creating a win-win situation. (“Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room”. Dir. Marse Alberti. Magnolia Pictures, 2005. DVD). According to the deregulation policy, while the traders’ actions may have been legal, the resultant rolling blackouts caused accidents and fires, making the actions immoral. Consequentialist theory advocates that an act is ethically immoral if it results in consequences deemed wrong or harmful by the majority of people in a society (Hooker, 2002). The motive behind the power outage was to make more money (capitalism), which led to unethical and immoral engagements by the corporation.
Enron was a company that definitely focused on capitalism. It was not just the goal of the company, but it was also the personal drive of its leaders. As Shaw and Barry stated, “Capitalism can be defined as an economic system that operates on the basis of profit and market exchange and in which the major means of production and distribution are in private hands” (Shaw and Barry 150). Early in his career, Kenneth Lay’s egoism led to him wanting the energy industry deregulated because he knew it would bring profits for the company. Deregulation was initially promoted as a way to increase competition.
If one reviews Enron’s actions from the Libertarian prospective, Enron’s executives in part utilized the Libertarian ideology because both were advocates of an unrestricted free market. However, the Libertarians shunned fraudulent activity. According to Shaw & Barry (2010), “Libertarianism clearly involves a commitment to leaving market relations-buying, selling, and other exchanges- totally unrestricted. Force and fraud are forbidden, of course, but there should be no meddling with the un-coerced exchanges of consenting individuals” (Shaw and Barry 116). As mentioned earlier, Enron used the legal system to their advantage, however, Enron’s executives allowed greed to cloud their moral decision making skills, and the government had to eventually intervene. Public and corporate pressure forced the government to start regulating the industry again. This brought the prices down and caused Enron to fall. We can see now that deregulation resulted in high prices, unreliable services (blackouts), job losses, no obligations to provide universal service, and loss of tax revenue (Pha, 2002). The after effects supported Shaw and Barry’s point that unregulated market transactions can be disastrous (Shaw and Barry 117).
“To explain why pursuit of self-interest necessarily leads to the greatest social benefit, Smith invoked the law of supply and demand” (Shaw and Barry 158). The law of supply and demand was not effective as with other products, because power is a need, not just a want. David Freeman, Chair of the California Power Authority stated, “There is one fundamental lesson we must learn from this experience: electricity is really different from everything else. It cannot be stored, it cannot be seen, and we cannot do without it, which makes opportunities to take advantage of a deregulated market endless. It is a public good that must be protected from private abuse” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_electricity_crisis).
Profit at all costs is another great example of Enron acting legally but immorally. The company loved taking risks and they believed there would be a big payoff for taking these risks, which led to creating a power house in India with the emphasis on financial capitalism. “It also is noted that Enron’s operations abroad have earned the opprobrium of human rights activists, in particular in respect of its $3 billion joint venture with the state utility of Maharashtra in India. Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have documented human rights abuses on the part of local police officers acting as a private security force for Enron. They accused Enron’s cops of beating local opponents of the power plant, and of dragging citizens out of their homes and then beating them for refusing to cooperate with the firm” (Bratton, 2002). Enron used legal matters to increase wealth for the company, while driving people out of their homes and hurting people.
Broadband with Blockbuster was another source for Enron to increase capitalism, as they remained immoral. The focus on making profits or wanting to make personal profits at all costs corrupted the company, which led them to not be truthful with the employees, shareholders, and to the world about their failed strategies and finances. This went against the moral standard of truth telling. As the world was buying more shares of Enron, the top leaders of the company like Kenneth Lay, Jeffery Skilling, and Andrew Fastow were all selling their shares, while continuing to promote the stocks of the company. As a result, many people who had invested money into their 401K and other shares of Enron lost their savings, but when the leaders were asked questions facing their moral actions about people losing their money, their egoism surprised everyone.
Jeff Skilling told the court, “He did not do anything wrong that was not in the interest of the shareholders of the company” (“Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room”. Dir. Marse Alberti. Magnolia Pictures, 2005. DVD). This illustrates Enron’s narrow point of view regarding corporate responsibility. One of the key features of capitalism is, “the existence of companies or business firm separate from the human beings who work for and within them” (Shaw and Barry 154). It was morally wrong for Jeff Skilling to use capitalism for shareholders as a scapegoat for something which he did, and blame the idea of profit-making as the shareholder’s goal but not his own. He did not meet the moral standard of accountability. When the capitalist’s point of view overtakes the minds of the individuals, people who are left alone without accountability will pursue profit over anything else. Andrew Fastow used this opportunity when he created LGN. He involved big banks such as Merryil Lynch, J P Morgan Chase, Citigroup, etc. to increase more capital for the company through an artificial company. The drive to make profits at all costs blinded the banks and the lawyers who approved the project.
On page 162 of the text, Shaw and Barry state, “Because of their sway over the market and their political clout, the gigantic corporations that we know today have altered the face of capitalism that Adam Smith would have trouble recognizing it”. Profits at all costs have destroyed the idea of capitalism. Everything Enron did supported their egoism and went against the theory of business egoism, which supports capitalism. They paid off government officials, lawyers, bankers, and anyone else who stood in the way of making more money through false profits. Some of the ideas of capitalism were to create free competition and to be free of government interference, but Enron’s use of government officials (lobbyist) to avoid competition in the markets goes against this idea. “Enron spent $10.2 million on influence in Washington between 1997 and 2000. In his gubernatorial campaigns, George W. Bush received $774,100 from Enron managers and $312,500 from the company” (Bratton, 2002).
Karl Marx argued that as the means of production becomes concentrated in the hands of the few, the balance of power between the capitalists (bourgeoisie) and laborers (proletariat) tips further in favor of the bourgeoisie. This is what happens when Enron’s top leaders sold their stocks, while the employees were locked out from selling their stocks. Enron also required everyone to agree with their business practices otherwise, they would refuse to do business with them. When John Olson a skeptical analyst, refused to issue the buy rating Enron demanded, Merrill Lynch fired him (Houston Business Journal).
Even though the top leaders of Enron walked away with millions of dollars, they were not able to enjoy the fruits of their labor – it was enjoyed by someone else. Jeff Skilling ended up having to pay $23 million to the lawyers that represented him at court. “Karl Marx answers the question of what happens to the people that are paid handsomely for their efforts. He says, they ‘remain alienated, for as the fruits of their labor are enjoyed by someone else, their work ultimately proves meaningless to them” (Shaw and Barry 165).
Since the goal of the top managers and the auditors of the company was to increase profits for a small number of people while harming a large group (society), their actions can be considered as unethical, and the consequentialist theory can be thus applied. The managers of Enron recognized private partnerships that were supposed to provide goods and services to the firm, such as purchasing wholesale power and reselling it to Enron. The managers originally steered Enron’s purchasing towards these entities without a bidding process, which resulted in the managers earning higher compensation at the expense of shareholders. The firm may have been able to acquire resources less expensively from firms that did not have a relationship with Enron’s managers. The managers, in due course, expanded the system with the partnerships holding no real assets and were paid from Enron for goods and services that were never given.
This system provided extraordinary revenue to the managers, which can be considered a good consequence from the consequentialist viewpoint under the utilitarian evaluative norms. At the same time, the scheme harmed a great number of stakeholders, employees, and customers, and condensed their well-being and contentment. From the consequentialist perspective, the negative cost of the mangers’ actions far outweighed the positive consequences of escalating their personal wealth. The idea of profits at all costs was morally and ethically wrong.
Deontological theory views acts that are permissible or not permissible based on a relationship giving rise to a duty (Lefkowitz, 2003). In contrast to consequentialist theories, deontological theories do not scrutinize the final outcomes of acts. The managers of Enron violated their general and explicit fiduciary duties by creating firms to benefit their interests at the cost of shareholders and other stakeholders. They violated their fiduciary duties by creating fraudulent financial statements. The auditors also violated their fiduciary duties to the public and the shareholders of Enron by certifying the fraudulent financial statements as accurate. In the implied hierarchy of duties in the corporate setting, any conflict of interest among managers, auditors, and shareholders should be determined in favor of the shareholders. The managers and the auditors subordinated the welfare of shareholders and other stakeholders to their personal financial benefit. This deontological framework for assessing the morals of the actions at Enron, though, differs from the virtue ethics approach.
Virtue ethics postulates the continuation of a permanent set of ethical rules that a human being can use to conclude the rightness of a deed. A virtue is a disposition to react in a good or suitable way to a circumstance or event. When considering virtue ethics in relation to Enron, it seems that not only the managers, but also the auditors were unethical since they did not act in a virtuous manner. An ethical human being, by the principles of modern society, would not engage in fraud for private gain. In addition, the managers and auditors deliberately engaged in actions they knew were unethically and legally improper. Their intent is evidenced by their attempts to cover up their actions by inappropriately manipulating financial statements and hiding the act by attempting to destroy documents and evidence of wrong doing.
Even though consequentialist theory, deontological theory, and virtue ethics have dissimilar approaches to assessing ethical performance at Enron, they land at the same conclusions. The consequentialist theories observe the result of the collapse of the firm and the damage caused to stakeholders as the critical issue determining the principles of the behavior. The deontological theories scrutinize the breach of explicit and implicit duties as the calculating factor determining the ethics of the events at Enron. Virtue ethics suggest that virtuous people would not have performed the acts of the managers and the auditors at Enron. The behavior of the managers and the auditors at Enron was unethical regardless of the ethical framework used for evaluating the events leading to the bankruptcy of the firm. This case study of Enron showed us that capitalism can lead people to do things that are legal and illegal in the pursuit of wealth. They will also twist legal actions in such a way that they are immoral and unethical, such as using the mark to market accounting method to inflate Enron’s financial statements and taking advantage of energy deregulation in California to charge the state large sums of money, basically extortion. To the public, Enron would contend they held a Utilitarian view while in retrospect we can see that they were driven by egoism. Enron also most literally falls under the Libertarian point of view whereby the government will not get involved as long as the actions of a company do not interfere with others. Again this has another side to the equation. The government did get involved with Enron’s activities, but because Enron lobbied for passage of bills that would benefit Enron.
In the end, the bank collapse of 2008 illustrates that companies have not learned from Enron’s mistakes and still have a “profit at all cost” attitude. Even when the banks were offered government bailouts, part of the money went toward executive bonuses. Most recently, Greg Smith’s resignation letter from Goldman Sachs, published in the New York Times, shows us that companies still have a profit above all else attitude. Australia is heading down the same path: Australia has deregulated electricity, natural gas, water, postal services, telecommunications, and many other important public services. They have also experienced blackouts and the prices have skyrocketed. The story of Enron proves that Capitalism needs regulation. Capitalism does work, but only if the government provides safeguards for its citizens.

Work Cited

Cited References
Shaw, William, and Vincent Barry. Moral Issues in Business. 12th. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing, 2012. Print.
Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room. Dir. Marse Alberti. Magnolia Pictures, 2005. DVD.
Pha, Anna. ENRON: CAPITALISM IN A NUTSHELL. Surry Hills: New Age Publishers, 2002. eBook.
"California electricity crisis." Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. N.p., n.d. Web. 29 Jul 2012. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_electricity_crisis>.
Bratton, W. Enron and the Dark Side of Shareholder Value, Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper No. 035, The George Washington University Law School, 2002
Perin, M. "The energy analyst enron couldn't buy." (2002): n. page. 0. <http://www.bizjournals.com/houston/stories/2002/09/30/story2.html?page=all>. Brad, Hooker. Ideal Code, Real World: A Rule-Consequentialist Theory of Morality. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000. Print.
Lefkowitz, J. Ethics and values in industrial-organizational psychology. Psychology Press, 2003. Print.

Additional References
Epstein, Alex. The Unlearned Lesson of Enron–4 Years Later. Capitalism Magazine, 2005. Web. <http://capitalismmagazine.com/2005/12/the-unlearned-lesson-of-enron-4-years-later/>. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Electricity_market http://upwithchrishayes.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/03/31/10956128-affordable-care-act-charts-graphs?lite http://de-fact-o.com/fact_read.php?id=94 http://thecanadian.org/item/1341-power-failure-part-2-the-kokish-river http://daviscalifornia.net/articles http://www.digplanet.com/wiki/California_electricity_crisis http://www.ldsfreedomforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=22999 http://www.victorianweb.org/philosophy/utilitarianism.html http://lilt.ilstu.edu/pefranc/3-Ts of Justice.htm http://www.juliantrubin.com/encyclopedia/electricity/california_electricity_crisis.html http://californiaphoton.com/cache/g/wikipedia_California_electricity_crisis.html http://environment-msnbc.newsvine.com/_news/2011/12/21/9609676-power-plant-rules-unveiled-higher-bills-cleaner-air?lite http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-deontological/ http://doingethics.com/DEE/dee ch1/ethical.traditions.htm http://www.hks.harvard.edu/fs/mrisse/Courses/Seminar - 458.pdf http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/ct-met-drew-peterson-crowd-0729-20120729,0,3966594.story http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mill/ http://www.utilitarianism.com/mill5.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Stuart_Mill https://litigation-essentials.lexisnexis.com/webcd/app?action=DocumentDisplay&crawlid=1&doctype=cite&docid=2004 Mich. St. L. Rev. 327&srctype=smi&srcid=3B15&key=b711684239846f6ca54fade71c2a5f9c http://management.about.com/cs/generalmanagement/a/Enron091902.htm http://abcnews.go.com/Business/10-things-learn-enron-scandal-10-years/story?id=15048641# http://www.soxfirst.com/30394498/10_years_after_enron_what_have_we_learned.php http://www.chron.com/business/steffy/article/Steffy-The-lessons-we-could-have-learned-from-2293369.php http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1084239/ http://www.webcitation.org/5tZ0qQyoO http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=301475

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Enron

...Enron Corporation (former NYSE ticker symbol ENE) was an American energy company that was originally involved in transmitting and distributing electricity and natural gas throughout the United States. It was founded in 1985 in Omaha, NB. The company later relocated to downtown Houston, TX and was based in the Enron Complex. Enron transformed energy into a commodity that could be traded like stock and bonds. Before its bankruptcy in late 2001, Enron employed approximately 22,000 staff and was one of the world's leading electricity, natural gas, communications and pulp and paper companies, with claimed revenues of nearly $101 billion in 2000. Fortune named Enron "America's Most Innovative Company" for six consecutive years. The top executives at Enron were: Kenneth Lay: Founder, Chairman, and Chief Executive Officer Jeffrey Skilling: President, Chief Operating Officer, and CEO (February-August 2001) Andrew Fastow: Chief Financial Officer Prior to joining Enron, Skilling told Lay that he would not join the company and build his new division unless he could use mark-to market accounting. The concept of mark-to market accounting is essentially stating potential future values as profits. Much of what happened at Enron can be linked to this form of accounting. This radical notion of value came to define the way Enron presented itself to the world, justifying the millions in profits on a business before it had generated a penny in actual revenues. Skilling felt that...

Words: 1039 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Enron

...A new strategy Enron was the biggest seller of natural gas in North America in 1992, their EBIT was 122 million dollar. Enron used differentiation strategy which aimed to develop and operated with different assets such as pipelines, services, paper plants, water plants and electricity plants. Enron did not just make profit on its assets but also traded with contracts of the assets and service in order to reach higher profit. This is how Enron became a favourite among investors in the ‘90s and its stock price increased 311%. The growth did not stop until the year of 2000. Enron’s market value was above 60 billion dollars and its stock price was 83,13 dollars the 31 December of 2000. The Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 helped them with their derivatives businesses. “One example was during the California electricity crisis (2000-2001) where they manipulated the California energy market and sent electricity prices surging by at least a factor of eight. During that time, the price of natural gas was trading as much as $60 per thousand cubic feet in California (which was previously selling for about $3 per thousand cubic feet). This kind of manipulation increased Enron's stock price and revenues. But this not so clever manipulation of Enron made itself a political target and accelerated the ruins of their finances.” Enron’s downfall Mark-to-market Accounting The use of mark-to-market accounting later struck back. The Enron’s aggressive accounting had corrupted...

Words: 1713 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Enron

...Running Head: ENRON CORPORATION Enron Corporation July 20, 2011 Based in Houston, Texas, Enron Corporation was an American energy, commodities and service company. Enron was formed in 1985 by Kenneth Lay after merging Houston Natural Gas and InterNorth. Enron employed approximately 22,000 employees and was one of the world’s leading electricity, natural gas communications, and pulp and paper companies before its demise in late 2001. For six consecutive years, Fortune named Enron "America's Most Innovative Company". At the end of 2001, it was discovered that Enron’s financial accounting reports had been falsified and the company had filed for bankruptcy. This substantial act was known as the "Enron scandal". The Enron scandal also lead to the creation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, a United States federal law enacted on July 30, 2002 to enforce firmer standards for management and accounting firms. Enron has since become a popular symbol of willful corporate fraud and corruption. Describe how Enron could have been structured differently to avoid such activities. Enron withheld essential financial and accounting information from the public and its shareholders. By law Enron was required to disclose their company financial dealings. Enron’s shareholders should have been informed about their financial and accounting transaction. Several shareholders were employees who had invested their life savings into this company. Instead of promoting within the...

Words: 1010 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Enron

...Enron Corporation was a company that provided services which related to energys, commodities and services based in Houston Texas. Enron employed approximately 22,000 staff. It was one of the world's leading electricity, natural gas, communications, pulp, and paper companies. Enron claimed revenues of nearly $101 billion in 2000 before it filed bankruptcy in late 2001. Enron was named "America's Most Innovative Company" for six years in a row by Fortune. In 2001, Enron was accused of accounting fraud which later was recognized as the "Enron Scandal" and forced to file bankruptcy. The scandal led attention to other corporation's practices and activities from this result. The creation of the Sarbanes-Oaxely Act of 2002 was influenced by the Enron scandal as well. Enron's roots go back to a company that was formed in 1932 known as the "Northern Natural Gas Company". The company was reorganized in 1979 as leading subsidiary of a holding company known as InterNorth Inc. The company was a leader in natural gas, transmissions, and marketing. It was also a provider of natural gas liquids as well as an innovator in the plastic industry. InterNorth owned "Peak Antifreeze" as well as developing "EVAL" resins for food packaging. The Enron Corporation led itself into scandel, fraud, lies, and illegal financial cover-ups that would later be known as one of the biggest corporation scandels in history. 1. Discuss how Enron could have been structured differently to avoid such activities...

Words: 650 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Enron

.... Burton Final Paper: The Enron Scandal MSA 602 Dr. Pendarvis 12-4-2011 Abstract Enron's collapse is generally viewed as a morality tale - the natural result of managerial greed, a clueless board, and feckless gatekeepers. But none of these aspects of the story clearly distinguishes Enron from other major firms during the bubble era of the late 90s. This material identifies certain economic facts from the many moving parts that was Enron, and organizes them along two main threads. The first describes Enron's major businesses, and the incentives and constraints under which the managers of those businesses operated. The second thread describes the basic financial engineering tools developed by Enron's finance department. These threads are then woven into the timeline of Enron's ultimate collapse. What emerges is a tale of how bad bets that resulted in good outcomes came to be viewed by top management and the board as bets worth repeating on an ever-larger scale. Early success in highly risky ventures were ramped up and duplicated, under perverse incentives, into a financial disaster. The firm then doubled down on that disaster with non-economic hedges developed by the finance group. The CFO, in a wholesale breach of his fiduciary responsibilities, including corruption of various gatekeepers, managed to cloak the poor quality of his hedges and his motivation in creating them. This duplicity prevented...

Words: 3025 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Enron

...------------------------------------------------- Advanced Strategic Management Enron By Anna Medvedeva The movie Enron which was based on the Enron Corporation in Houston, Texas is mainly about the company which followed institutionalized, systematic and creative planned accounting fraud for almost a decade. This resulted in Bankruptcy of the corporation in 2001 which was also is considered to be one of the biggest scandals in the US Market. The movie depicted was a little exaggerating when it comes to the economic dealings of the company in the market with its shares. The exploitation of Jeff skilling and Andrew Fastow who were well versed with burgeoning deregulated energy market, according to me are considered to be one of the important aspects of the fraud (as shown in the movie). Enron is now also considered to be the most willful corporate fraud in modern history. The few important points according to me that can be considered to be the reason of the company’s bankruptcy could have be avoided in order to save the company’s reputation, brand and value are: * The common business practices such as the limited liability special purpose entities which were established in number by Andrew Fastrow without the liability of these entities being shown in the annual accounting booklet could have been stopped. * As a foreign exchange program Enron involved in finding Energy Investors in India in 1992 due to the energy shortage problems. Enron enlisted a 20 year power purchase program with an...

Words: 607 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Enron

...In the repercussion of Enron‘s bankruptcy filing, numerous Enron executives were charged with criminal acts. Those charges were fraud, insider trading and money laundering. Enron was described as―House Of Cards‖ as it was built over a pool of gasoline. It all sort of became smoke and mirror. Louis Borget, former Enron's CEO was also exposed to be rerouting company’s money to offshore accounts. Once their schemes were discovered by the auditors, Kenneth Lay encourages them to "keep making us millions". However, the traders were fired once it was revealed that Enron's reserves were gambled awaywhich nearly destroyed the company. After these facts were brought to light, Ken Lay denies having any knowledge of wrongdoing. Needless to say, when required to testify before the U.S. Congress on the reasons for Enron‘s collapse, Ken Lay, Jeff Skilling and Andrew Fastow, sought refuge under the Fifth Amendment. Andrew Fastow, Jeffrey Skilling, and Kenneth Lay are among the most notable top-level executives implicated in the collapse of Enron‘s. Kenneth Lay, the former chairman of Enron was prosecuted on 11 criminal counts of making misleading statements and fraud. Jeff Skilling, former Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Enron was charged on 35 counts that included conspiracy wire fraud, insider trading, securities fraud, and making false statements on financial reports. Andrew Fastow, former Enron’s Chief Financial Officer (CFO), faced 98 counts of money laundering, fraud, and conspiracy in...

Words: 833 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Enron

...Enron and Arthur Andersen Accounting Scandal The Enron accounting scandal resulted in a loss of reputation to Arthur Andersen which was a result of fraudulent financial statement reporting. Crimes discovered included irregular accounting procedures which could be turned in as fraud which involved Enron and Arthur Andersen as its accounting firm. They were found to have committed wire fraud, security fraud, making false statements to banks, creating several “independent” companies, called “Special-Purpose Entities” (SPEs) and using them as a way to hide many bad and devalued assets to fool investors into believing Enron was financially healthy so Enron executives could pocket millions from sales of inflated stock. They created a company called LJM1 which purchased the provider’s stock at inflated prices and took them off the books at Enron. Later, when the price of the stock fell, Enron did not have the loss on its books. LJM allowed Enron to move money-losing assets off its balance sheet. LJM was also involved in complex hedging that was supposed to reduce the volatility of some of Enron's investments, including stakes in high-tech and telecom businesses. Arthur Andersen, Enron’s accountants, were accused to have allowed LJM1 to be isolated from Enron’s books, and go unnoticed. In the end, LJM1 was stuck with stock from the internet provider, which they purchased from Enron at inflated prices, and now were worth much less. Andy Fastow was the Enron executive who...

Words: 1242 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Enron

...Enron Corporation Describe how Enron could have been structured differently to avoid such activities. Enron had a code of ethics policy in place but failed to implement it correctly (Bagley, C.E. & Savage, D.W., 2010). An enforced code of ethics policy, which includes required annual ethics training, is crucial in setting standards for employees in regards to their ethical behavior. It reminds all employees that they need to think about how they conduct themselves on the job. Here at NASA, we have a code of ethics policy and annual ethics training. NASA’s ethics training is a required course that all employees must take. Training informs all NASA employees of what is and is not acceptable behavior. Along with the enforcement of a code of ethics policy and training, Enron needed to be structured so that people could safely come forth if they witnessed any illegal or unethical actions. Of course, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which makes it easier for employees to come forth, did not pass until after the Enron scandal. Another way that Enron could have been structured differently was to have a better way to scrutinize the activities that went on at Enron. That is, structure the company so that daily activities could be closely monitored. A separate group could have been created to do some internal monitoring of the activities at Enron. The things I mentioned would have been helpful in developing a better culture at Enron and could have helped limit such activities. However...

Words: 1238 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Enron

...Professor Young March 5, 2011 Enron was an old line energy company, owning electric power production facilities and natural gas pipelines. It engaged in several acquisitions during the late 1980s and the 1990s that dramatically increased its size. Its acquisitions included power companies in the U.S. and abroad, as well as investments in various energy and technology companies. In the 1990s, Enron reorganized itself as an energy trading company, whose primary form of business was to trade in various energy vehicles, including contracts to provide electric power in the future at pre-determined prices and similar contracts to deliver natural gas, water rights, wind power systems, broad band transmission systems, insurance, and other products. 1. Describe how Enron could have been structured differently to avoid such action. Enron, like most public companies was required by law to describe its party transaction to shareholders and the members of the investing public in several different disclosure documents. Overall, Enron failed to disclose facts that were important for understanding the substance of the transaction. Although they did disclose that there were large transactions that the CFA had interest. Enron did not give the CFO’s actual or expected benefits from these transactions or provide complete financial statements. The organizational structure could have been different by not changing the original structure. When Enron decided to change its structure by...

Words: 1126 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Enron

...1. ENRON Enron Corporation tuvo su origen durante la recesión en el año de 1985, cuando Kenneth Lay, CEO de la Houston Gas Company, se fusionó con Internorth Inc. La nueva compañía reportó en su primer año una pérdida de $14 millones de dólares, que consistía en $12.1 billones de dólares en activos, 15,000 empleados, la segunda en la nación con la mayor red de distribución y una imponente montaña de deudas. Enron fue una empresa típica de distribución de gas natural con todas las indumentarias tradicionales de un alto grado de apalancamiento, compitiendo en una “vieja economía” de energía regulada. Se tambaleaba en la quiebra en sus primeros años de operación, Enron tuvo que lidiar con un proceso de adquisición hostil. Su estrategia de “vieja economía” no motivaba al mercado de valores. Sin embargo en la década de 1990, sufrió un cambio drástico cuando Jeffrey Skilling remplazó a Richard Kinder como CEO. La empresa se dedicaba originalmente a la administración de gasoductos dentro de los Estados Unidos, aunque luego expandió sus operaciones como intermediario de los contratos de futuros y derivados del gas natural y al desarrollo, construcción y operación de gasoductos y plantas de energía, por todo el mundo, convirtiéndose rápidamente en una empresa de renombre internacional. En 1999, Enron fue nombrada por la revista Fortune como “La Empresa más innovadora de América” “No. 1 en Administración de Calidad” y “No. 2 en Empleados Talentosos” Crecimientos vertiginosos: 1990:...

Words: 2826 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Enron

...ENRON: The Idiocy and the Irony Introduction Red flags were blinding as Enron learned about possible corruption with Enron Oil Trading in Valhalla, New York. After the merger between HNG and InterNorth, the Valhalla office, originally established by InterNorth seemed all but forgotten until quarterly and annual reports were due. Supervisors Tom Harding and Steve Sulentic were rarely on-site, preferring the comfort of offices in Houston. Louis Borget who established and operated the trading business was an autocratic manager, receiving excessive incentive payment for profitable performance. Between 1984 - 1986, Valhalla continued to report profits in the emerging oil trading industry. A call to Enron in Houston by Apple Bank would shatter the false sense of security regarding Valhalla. An ensuing investigation by Arthur Andersen, an accounting firm employed by Enron, failed to produce concrete evidence of misappropriation within Valhalla. Questionable practices were identified, but Enron failed to react appropriately to this information. CEO Lay was able to persuade key executives within Enron and the board of directors to keep running Valhalla offices, with minor changes in personnel. Mick Seidl, unhappy with Lay’s influence over the board, called Mike Muckelroy to investigate Valhalla. Muckelroy’s investigation would become the tipping point regarding Valhalla. With a secret set of books discovered, fraudulent trading entities identified and $1 billion...

Words: 5014 - Pages: 21

Premium Essay

Enron

...The Enron and Corporate Governance Company Enron Corporation Industry Energy Founded Omaha, Nebraska, USA (1985) Founder Kenneth Lay Employees approx. 22,000 (2000) Fate Bankruptcy, 2001 Website enron.com To write about Enron I was inspired by documentary movie “Enron: The Smartest Guys in The Room”. It explains in details how negligence and ‘cheating’ in corporate governance can lead to disaster for whole nation. The case of Enron became classical example of the company where executives can manipulate whole industry using ‘creative accounting’ and corporate governance. Enron bankruptcy is the greatest knowing corporate failure in the US from the time when the crash of numerous savings and loan institutions in the 1980s. This scandal showed the necessity for important improvements in accounting and corporate governance in the country, along with a tight control at the moral values in the culture of business in whole and of enterprises in the country. Actually, one can find a lot of reasons why this collapse happened. And there is the problem of interest between the two roles played by Mr Andersen, as auditor but also as consultant to Enron; the lack of attention shown by members of the Enron board of directors to the off-books financial entities with which Enron did business; and the lack of truthfulness by management about the health of the company and its business operations. In some ways, the culture of Enron was the primary cause of the collapse...

Words: 1256 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Enron

...Enron Corp. Ivan Rodriguez Professor Daniel Smith Legal 100 April 30, 2011 2.      Discuss whether Enron’s officers acted within the scope of their authority.   3.      Describe the corporate culture at Enron.   4.      Discuss two alleged irregularities in the actions between sellers of securities and Enron.   5.      Discuss whether or not Enron was liable for the actions of its agents and employees.   The format of the report is to be as follows: o   Typed, double spaced, Times New Roman font (size 12), one inch margins on all sides, APA format. o   Type the question followed by your answer to the question. * In addition to the 3-4 pages required, a title page is to be included. The title page is to contain the title of the assignment, your name, the instructor’s name, the course title, and the date. Describe how Enron could have been structured differently to avoid such activities. Using computers, the Internet, and other resources, research the activities of the Enron Corporation (Enron), its officers, and its agents (auditors and sellers of securities). Using all the material presented thus far in the course, analyze the activities you researched. The Enron Corporation was an American energy company, which since its merger in 1985 with two other natural pipeline gas companies Houston Natural Gas and InterNorth failed to structure a corporation built around strong ethics and accordance with the law. It would be fair to predominantly commence by...

Words: 698 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Enron

...Enron and World Finance A Case Study in Ethics Edited by Paul H. Dembinski, Carole Lager, Andrew Cornford and Jean-Michel Bonvin Enron and World Finance Also by Observatoire de la Finance From Bretton Woods to Basel Finance & the Common Good/Bien Commun, no. 21, Spring 2005 Ethics of Taxation and Banking Secrecy Finance & the Common Good/Bien Commun, no. 12, Autumn 2002 Will the Euro Shape Europe? Finance & the Common Good/Bien Commun, no. 9, Winter 2001–2 Dommen, E. (ed.) Debt Beyond Contract Finance & the Common Good/Bien Commun, Supplement no. 2, 2001 Bonvin, J.-M. Debt and the Jubilee: Pacing the Economy Finance & the Common Good/Bien Commun, Supplement no. 1, 1999 Dembinski, P. H. (leading contributor) Economic and Financial Globalization: What the Numbers Say United Nations, Geneva, 2003 Enron and World Finance A Case Study in Ethics Edited by Paul H. Dembinski Carole Lager Andrew Cornford and Jean-Michel Bonvin in association with the Observatoire de la Finance Selection, editorial matter and Chapters 1, 2 and 16 © Observatoire de la Finance Remaining chapters © contributors 2006 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence ...

Words: 118357 - Pages: 474