Environmental Theories and Ethical Positions of Stakeholders

In: Business and Management

Submitted By hermanbethany
Words 452
Pages 2
An environmental theory that has come about because of the issues of treating animals as people has been whether or not the animals kept in captivity will face the loss of their habitat, will face the detrimental effects of global warming with no way to be rescued and also may be targeted by hunters. “Others worry about animals themselves. Steve Feldman, spokesman for the Association of Zoos and Aquariums, says that keeping and breeding animals in captivity is sometimes the only way to safeguard a species. Opponents of captivity, he argues, too often ignore the reality of habitat loss, global warming, hunters, and poachers threatening species in the wild,” according to Berdik (2013). It is a very real possibility that by releasing an animal from captivity and essentially treating them as a human that the animal could face complete loss of their natural habitat and may end up extinct or near-extinct due to hunters targeting them.
There are also ethical issues that arise from animals being treated as human beings instead of as animals. The first of these is that animals may or may not possess the same cognitive abilities of humans. According to Barlow (2013), “There are a million species of animals. I have studied fewer than a dozen. Based on my research and discussions with scientists, it appears likely that at least some great apes, cetaceans, and elephants possess cognitive abilities that the Nonhuman Rights Project believes are sufficient for legal personhood. “ Because of this, it would be hard to argue that an animal can be treated as a human when they do not have the same understanding ability as a human. Another ethical issue that may arise is that medical research can be hindered due to the release of animals from captivity. “Critics say legal personhood for animals is misguided, and even dangerous. They foresee a slippery slope in which a tightening web of…...

Similar Documents

Stakeholder

... enthusiastically or something that we’re proud of at all. Google had adopted the informal corporate motto “Don’t be evil” from the founders’ letter, and also developed an ethical code of conduct for both internal and external audiences. The core message is simple: Being Googlers means striving toward the highest possible standard of ethical business conduct. Realistically, Tom MacLean had, at most, one day to prepare for a meeting with his supervisor and her peer group. While he knew that a priority would be stemming the bad publicity over the decision to develop the Google.cn search engine within China, MacLean had not heard whether the management team was concerned enough to change course in China. In the meeting, MacLean would be expected to communicate a course of action for Google.cn that acknowledged all the negative attention. Could MacLean stand behind the original strategic plan to censor google.cn? ...

Words: 618 - Pages: 3

Stakeholder Theory

...Apply the stakeholder mapping concept to the University of Essex. What does your analysis tell you about the relative levels of interest and power of the various stakeholders? In this report, I shall define, explain and talk about what is known as “Stakeholders”. I will discuss their relations to an organisation, how much influence they have on it and how much control do they have over an organisation if any, and my model organisation here will be the University of Essex. Stakeholders can be defined as a group of individuals that can almost always affect or be affected by a company’s purpose, which of course may include government agencies, competing organisations, customers, suppliers, and staff as well (Boddy 2008). Given the widely spread effects of many businesses, stakeholding might extend to the whole of society (Sloman 2010). These groups have a stake in, or are significantly affected by what the organisation does. Freeman referred to them as a group of individuals (Freeman 1984), and that they must be looked at as individuals, and not just some entity. This is because –as mentioned by Robbins & Cutler (2009) – establishing a relationship with them can lead to a desirable organisational outcome, such as improved predictability of environmental changes, more successful innovations, and a greater organisational flexibility to reduce the impact of change. But for an organisation to establish a relationship with its stakeholders, it needs to...

Words: 1305 - Pages: 6

Stakeholder

...Final Examination : Essay Question 1. “Critically analyse the CSR concept using examples from what you have read” ‘Corporate Social Responsibility’, abbreviated to CSR, is the concept that businesses have a social responsibility towards society that encompasses economic, legal, ethical and discretionary expectations. It goes on to highlight how a company can be deemed a ‘corporate citizen’ only if they fulfill the economic, legal, ethical and philanthropic expectations of their stakeholders, and involves corporate social responsiveness (the methods of achieving social issue objectives) as well as corporate social performance (the end result). This essay shall attempt to critically analyse the CSR concept by weighing in the advantages against the disadvantages and reaching a balanced conclusion. One of the advantages of corporate social responsibility is business involvement: by addressing social issues, businesses can be a part of the solution and hence lead society. However, businesses may not be well equipped to be handling social issues especially on a larger scale, as was the case with Exxon Valdez. When the Exxon Valdez oil spill occurred, the company could not handle the situation on it’s own – it required the help of various other entities such as governments and NGO’s to clean the mess it made. Another advantage of corporate social responsibility is the fact that it wards off future government intervention. If a company engages in CSR effectively, then...

Words: 583 - Pages: 3

Stakeholder

...Stakeholders are people or groups of people who can be affected by, and therefore have an interest in, any action by an organization. The stakeholder concept is the view that businesses and their managers have responsibilities to a wide range of groups, not just shareholders. There are two different kinds of stakeholders; Internal & External Internal Stakeholders -These stakeholders are members of the organization: Employees Shareholders (who own the business) Managers and directors of a business External Stakeholders - These stakeholders do NOT form part of the organization but have a direct interest or involvement in the actions of the organization: Customers Suppliers Government Competitors Special interest groups Business decisions can have both negative and positive effects on stakeholders, but it is rare for all stakeholders to be either positively or negatively affected by any one-business activity. It is also possible for any one-stakeholder group to experience both negative and positive effects from the same business decision. This is why conflicts of interest between stakeholder groups with different objectives can arise. Unilever is the world's third largest consumer goods company. Its key stakeholders include: Customers Employees Suppliers Investors Government regulators Local communities Civil society organizations Academics and individual concerned citizens With some, such as our customers, employees, suppliers and......

Words: 316 - Pages: 2

Stakeholder

.... The awareness is an essential part of brand development which helps the brand to stand out from the other in this monopolistically competitive market. Sub questions: What different forms of CSR are available for the sport brands? How to evaluate the effectiveness of CSR on Nike’s brand with a month? What are the effect of CSR on the company image within a half year? How does CSR influence the suppliers, employees and customers that are bounded to Nike? Defining the problem (Onion model) Indentify: (CSR) Corporate Social Responsibility and Nike Brand Dissect : Forms of CSR used by Nike, Profile of Nike which use CSR, Reasons why Nike consider CSR, effects of CSR on the company image Select: forms, profile, reasons and effect of CSR on company image and the sales volume of Nike Raise: Research objectives Which factors are forming the company image? At what extent do these stakeholders influence the CSR and the company image? What constitutes the company image? For what purpose different groups of shareholders use CSR ? Formulate : How can Nike develop a focus and it’s practise to the corporate social responsibility by improving the conditions in contracted factories without any criticism within a period of 3 months ? How can Nike increase its sales, market shares and profit in a fiercly competitive industry during a Economic crisis and the influence of CSR on the company...

Words: 1550 - Pages: 7

Freeman Stakeholder Theory

...MANAGING FOR STAKEHOLDERS: TRADE-OFFS OR VALUE CREATION1 One of the central uses of stakeholder theory, in its original form, was as a counterpoint to the idea that corporations should be managed in the interests of shareholders. As the theory developed the debate was often framed in terms of “shareholders vs. stakeholders.” While developing “theories of the firm” is an interesting and useful project, focusing solely on “theory of the firm” obscures a more important contribution of stakeholder theory. The purpose of this brief essay is to set forth what I consider to be the central insight of stakeholder theory: the jointness of stakeholder interests. The Basic Idea The basic idea of “managing for stakeholders,” as I now see it, is quite simple, and I believe it is closer to the origins of the idea from Eric Rhenman and the Tavistock thinkers. In fact, Juha Nasi was correct in his assessment of the Scandinavian origins of the stakeholder idea that focus on what holds stakeholder interests together. Nasi originally suggested that we focus on “intressent” in Swedish. “In Finnish this term was modified as “intressentti” or “sidosryhma” which could be translated as an “interest group” or even as a “linkage” or “bonding” or “binding” group.” (Nasi, 1995 at 98) It is this bonding or binding idea that is most interesting to explore. Managing for stakeholders asks us to see stakeholders as “bound together by the jointness of their interests.” So, the basic idea goes like this...

Words: 2238 - Pages: 9

Stakeholder vs Stockholder Theory

... less ethical than the Stockholder Theory. The Stockholder Theory is more ethical than the Stakeholder theory due to the nature and philosophy of the structure. The main goal of a firm is to create wealth for the shareholders and creditors. For the firm to achieve this goal they must act as a team and this structure is built to create wealth and everyone is happy. The team starts out with the Stockholders that want their required return after their investments, but for them to have their returns they must have a very good board. The board people make a lot of money and they feel in power so they want to keep that up, but for them to keep their jobs they must create wealth for the creditors. One of the big decisions the board must make is to elect their CEO that will make their jobs easier. The CEO usually is the highest paid in the group and guides the company, so he must make the board very happy and for the board to be happy they must make the shareholders happy. For the CEO to have a great company and to keep his job he must have good management, which they all want to keep their jobs. So far everyone has the same common goal and for one to achieve their own goal they must help the other to achieve their goal. The main driver force of a company is the labor, which everything starts with them and flows into the shareholders. The Stockholder Theory is more ethical than the Stakeholders Theory, because it must take a team and from the Utilitarianism viewpoint this creates...

Words: 1125 - Pages: 5

Deontological Ethical Theory

...Deontological Ethical Theory Deontological derives the word 'Deon' from Greek and the word means duty or obligation. Deontological belongs to the normative position of ethics as it judges an action's morality basing the judgment on action to these rules. A deontology is in one sense basically a theory of our duties just like the rest of the other theories of ethics. Scholars have frequently contrasted this theory to Consequentialism. Immanuel Kant based Kantianism on deontology as he argued that in order to act morally, individuals should act from duty. Individual's should not pull the plug when their lives are endangered as deontology will judge the morality of such decisions based on the rule's actions. The application of deontology is better brought out by the absolute deontologists who support the belief that action are either right or wrong; pulling the plug is therefore either right or wrong, no in-betweens. The best way to view this act is to focus neither on the intentions nor consequences of the act but rather the act itself. This is what absolute deontologists uphold. The first step of the analysis is to determine what pulling the plug entails. When one ends the life of another it is considered as murder. If they end the life of many it is manslaughter. If an individual ends their lives then they are considered to have committed suicide. If they try to commit suicide and they fail they are said to have attempted suicide and are in a retribution state tried in...

Words: 741 - Pages: 3

Stakeholder vs. Shareholder Theory

...School of Business, Public Policy and Social Entrepreneurship SUBJECT-101 BUSINESS, CULTURE AND SOCIETY Shareholder v/s. Stakeholder Theory Under the guidance of Dr. Kuriakose Mamkoottam Professor & Director School of Business, Public Policy & Social Entrepreneurship (SBPPSE) Ambedkar University Delhi (AUD) Submitted by: Amrita Arora S143F0005 Shareholder v/s. Stakeholder Theory The term business refers to any organization that is engaged in making a product or providing a service for a profit. And society, in its broadest sense, refers to human beings and to the social structures they collectively create. Both, business and society, taken together, form an interactive social system. Each needs the other, and each influences the other. The most central and debatable topic on the relation between business and society today is about the fundamental purpose of the business. This question has been answered with the help of two different theories – Shareholder Theory and Stakeholder Theory. Each of them is explained below. The Shareholder Theory (Ownership Theory of the Firm) sees the firm as the property of its owners. The purpose of the firm is to maximize the returns to its shareholders, which is also depicted in its single objective of Value Maximization. Here, managers and boards of directors are agents of shareholders and have no obligations to others, other than those directly specified by law. Many companies, like Apple, have performed exceptionally...

Words: 489 - Pages: 2

Nursing and Environmental Theory, Nightingale

...Nursing and Environmental Theory, “Florence Nightingale.” Nightingale’s theory changed the face of nursing by her observations she conducted of her patient’s dying illness and the environmental conditions that contributed to their illness and possible deaths. By her own observations came about the development of,” Nightingale’s Theory”. Nightingale’s theory consist of four parts,”The Metaparadigm of Nursing”, Person, Health, Nursing and Environment. All of which are connected to each other pertaining to the patient as a whole. Person is the patient, by taking care of the patient’s individual needs. The nurse should address each patient’s needs and illness separately to encourage or achieve the best outcome for that patient’s illness. Improving the patient’s health and by improving their environment. The environment paradigm in Nightingale’s theory is in my opionion the most important theory and connects all of the parts as one. Protecting the patient’s environment may include, keeping the patient’s surrounding area’s clean, neat and free of debri or rubbish. No Sharps items laying around(hospital or home area’s)that are uncapped or contaminated, No soiled sheets left on patient, clean water for baths whether it’s a bed bath or shower, clean drinking water for...

Words: 668 - Pages: 3

Ethical Theory

...Applying an Ethical Theory Moral or Ethical dilemmas are an everyday occurrence in our society. The situations present two options as solutions from which one is expected to choose. There is an expectation though that one will choose the option that is considered moral. Ethical questions or problems face every human being at some point in life. One such moral question is; “is it right for women to have abortions”. Abortion has been a major cause of controversy all around the world, with people having different views on whether abortion is good or bad based on their moral beliefs. The main issue that surrounds this ethical dilemma is whether the fetus should have rights to life. Another issue is whether there is justification for a woman to perform abortion based on the rights to her body considering the fetus also has rights to life (Tännsjö, 2008). The deontological theory is not in support of abortion; the objection though, is that women also have rights over their bodies. Discussion Deontological ethics is a moral theory that is in line with common sense intuitions, the scriptures, and natural moral duties or rules. The theory mainly focuses on compliance with moral duties or rules. The main principles of the theory include a task should be carried out for the sake of the obligation. For instance, there is a duty not to do certain things such as murder, lie or break promises since these acts are considered to be wrong. The expected consequences define what the duty...

Words: 891 - Pages: 4

Created Theory: Ethical Bottom Line

...Created Theory: Ethical Bottom Line Introduction The Ethical Bottom Line Theory is developed on the bases of the case study and CSR theories and the traditional concept of accounting system. In traditional business accounting and common usage, the "bottom line” refers to either the “profit” or “loss”, which is usually recorded at the very bottom line on a statement of revenue and expenses. The Triple Bottom Line was coined by Elkington (1994) to introduce the full cost accounting method. For example if a corporation shows a profit but their production pollutes the river, and the government ends up spending taxpayers’ money for rehabilitation programs. So the Triple Bottom Line was coined to address the issue. The triple bottom line incorporates the notion of sustainability into business decisions. The TBL is an accounting framework with three dimensions: social, environmental (or ecological) and financial. The TBL dimensions are also commonly called the three Ps: people, planet and profit and are referred to as the "three pillars of sustainability". Interest in triple bottom line accounting has been growing in both for-profit, nonprofit and government sectors. Many organizations have adopted the TBL framework to evaluate their performance in a broader context (Elkington, 1994) Ethical Bottom Line theory condenses the Triple Bottom Line of Elkington (1994) framework and integrates the Stakeholder Theory. Brief Description of the Theory The theory...

Words: 437 - Pages: 2

Stakeholder

...|STAKEHOLDER |INTEREST |POWER | |Hotel’s managers and employees |- Have more opportunities for job creation and|- Authority to contribute on the operation of| | |promotion within the company. |the hotel. | | |- Job security, prospects and pay. |- Possibility to do something good by working| | |- Safe working space |there | | |- Providing insurances and other benefits. |- Job enrichment | |Hotel’s senior executive and |- Profitability of the complex. |- Authority to make decision about human | |board of directors |- Maintaining a strong reputation for the |resource management. | | |complex. | | |Travel agencies |- Creating the travel business and job for |- To urge the employees or refer them to | | |local people. |other business. | |University/College |- Reduce the unemployment rate...

Words: 342 - Pages: 2

Stakeholder

... profit or shareholder wealth maximization (PFW (2003)). The descriptive version is about the actual managers’ behavior and the normative version suggests that managers should behave in certain ways. Jones and Wicks further classify the normative version as ethics based and the instrumental and descriptive as social science based theories. Current empirical studies of actual managerial behavior do not lend much support to the descriptive version (Jones and Wicks (1999), Margolis and Walsh (2003)). Jones and Wicks find the instrumental stakeholder theory more promising. PFW (2003) noted that a general version of this would be found acceptable even by those who hold shareholder wealth maximization to be the primary goal. The normative version emphasizes the “moral and ethical” arguments for the stakeholder perspective of looking at the firm and its objectives. This view would clearly reject the shareholder wealth maximization as the primary goal for the firm. The Jones and Wicks attempt at developing a convergent theory has its critics. Trevino and Weaver (1999) seem to suggest that stakeholder theorists might very well work with other organizational theories (for example, even the agency theory approach suggested by Jensen and Meckling (1976)) instead of claiming a new theory. They suggest that what is available is a “stakeholder research tradition” rather than a stakeholder theory. The researchers share a common concern for organization stakeholder......

Words: 4065 - Pages: 17

Ethical Theory Development

..., no one is born as an ethical being. Understanding ethics and making ethical decisions takes years of education, understanding, and practice to be done effectively. Fortunately the past couple generations of educators and educational administrators had the foresight to project the importance of ethical decision making on the success of leaders and the organizations they lead. There are many different schools of ethical thought that span several centuries. It is outside the scope of this paper to address all of the available literature available on the many different ethical theories. Therefore, this student has chosen to examine the concepts of virtue ethics, consequentialist ethics, and ethical egoism. These ethical concepts provide an adequate introduction to three of the main schools of ethical philosophy and have helped this student advance his understanding of ethical theory development. Chapter two provides a literature review of the concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR). CSR, often referred to as business ethics, is chosen by this student to be introduced in this paper because of the scrutiny business leaders operate under in the 21st century. Giacalone and Thompson (2006) explain that contemporary business educators have a responsibility to, “Help students become more socially responsible and ethically sensitive as we prepare a new generation of business practitioners. We face a difficult struggle as less responsible individuals and businesses......

Words: 19601 - Pages: 79