Premium Essay

Essay Mercutio Is Responsible For Romeo's Death

Submitted By
Words 528
Pages 3
The most famous writing in the english language contains many different parts that give it it’s success, but one is very overlooked. In “The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet” there is a rather large amount of portrayed character that can be to blame for the two lover’s deaths, but who is the most responsible for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet, that is the real question.Many characters were partially responsible for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet, but the character that is most responsible is Mercutio.

Firstly in [asl] Romeo is avoiding contact with other people. It is said that Romeo spends his days in the grove of sycamore [asl] and the rest of the time he spends in his house (asl). this shows Rome is (or seems to be) depressed by the Rosaline issue. Romeo proves this by climbing over the orchard wall in [asl]. Mercutio, despite knowing the mental state of his friend decides to instead of resolve the issue, to just ignore it causing Romeo to affirm his own irrational feelings. this self-affirmation is one of the reasons Romeo acted so rash as to marrying Juliet. With Mercutio acting differently in this scene Romeo may not’ve been depressed at the time of the illiterate servant and Benvolio may not’ve been insistent of Romeo going to the party. …show more content…
The servant, not knowing who they were, invites them to the party. Then Benvolio tries to convince Romeo to go to the party and Romeo agrees. On the night of the party Romeo tries to make excuses for not going. This is where Mercutio steps in and convinces Romeo to enter. Without Mercutio in this scene Romeo wouldn’tve entered and never met

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Explore the Ways Shakespeare Presents and Develops Tensions in Verona in His Play Romeo and Juliet

...In this essay we are going explore the ways in which Shakespeare presents and develops tensions in Verona in his play Romeo and Juliet Romeo and Juliet is a tragic love story; the play begins with a prologue telling us that the two lovers die "A pair of star-cross`d lovers take their life" this creates tension leaving the audience engaged and wonder why do this young children have to die? How did they die? And who is to be held responsible for their death. The play opens on a scene of conflict, where the audience learns that the Montague’s and Capulet’s are lifelong enemies and hold an "ancient grudge". In Act 1 scene 1 Sampson and Gregory, two servants of the house of Capulet, walk through the streets of Verona with a conversation of vulgar jokes, where Sampson talks about his hatred of the house of Montague. The two make remarks about physically dominating the Montague men and sexually dominating the Montague women by illustrating how they intertwine sex with violence and death. Gregory sees two Montague servants approaching, and discusses with Sampson the best way to provoke them into a fight without breaking the law. Sampson bites his thumb at the Montague’s. A verbal confrontation quickly escalates into a fight, “do you bite your tongue at us sir?” a fight doesn’t need to happen but because of the masculine honour and pride they had and they believed a man must defend his honour whenever threatened which was why most of the fights both houses had and will have happens...

Words: 1248 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Harold Bloom

...Bloom’s Classic Critical Views W i l l ia m Sha k e Sp e a r e Bloom's Classic Critical Views alfred, lord Tennyson Benjamin Franklin The Brontës Charles Dickens edgar allan poe Geoffrey Chaucer George eliot George Gordon, lord Byron henry David Thoreau herman melville Jane austen John Donne and the metaphysical poets John milton Jonathan Swift mark Twain mary Shelley Nathaniel hawthorne Oscar Wilde percy Shelley ralph Waldo emerson robert Browning Samuel Taylor Coleridge Stephen Crane Walt Whitman William Blake William Shakespeare William Wordsworth Bloom’s Classic Critical Views W i l l ia m Sha k e Sp e a r e Edited and with an Introduction by Sterling professor of the humanities Yale University harold Bloom Bloom’s Classic Critical Views: William Shakespeare Copyright © 2010 Infobase Publishing Introduction © 2010 by Harold Bloom All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage or retrieval systems, without permission in writing from the publisher. For more information contact: Bloom’s Literary Criticism An imprint of Infobase Publishing 132 West 31st Street New York NY 10001 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data William Shakespeare / edited and with an introduction by Harold Bloom : Neil Heims, volume editor. p. cm. — (Bloom’s classic critical views) Includes bibliographical references...

Words: 239932 - Pages: 960