While Greece is the democratic cradle and the European civilization home, its governments evolution appear to become in contradiction with the actual European policy. Indeed the legislative elections has placed Tspiras at the heart of different opinions concerning Greece and Europe future. A debate opposes now the people who welcome this changes without skepticism and the others. The New York Times that is an American newspapers, talk about this political event using pictures and an explicit title that demonstrate the actual position of the Greece. Liberation that is a french radical newspaper, also uses a title that indicates its and a picture. Both articles treat overall the same subject, the victory of Syria and the fact that it is a real milestone for the Greece and Europe. Indeed, the New York Times used a Tsipras quotation saying «our shared future in Europe is not the future of austerity« (2015). The Duflot article title in Liberation newspaper use a fragment of her speech that also referencing that. They both using pictures and quotations to explain what they say. Nevertheless, they do not have the same focusing and the way of demonstrating it. Each articles do not mention exactly the same things and the way to say its, they have different point of view. Indeed, Duflot sentences focus on the succeed of the party that is going to be the motor of global political change and the defeat of austerity policy. Whereas, The new York Times is more global and explicative on its focusing. Its article speaks about the vote results, the opinions of people from others countries, A.Tsipras promises and his expectation of renegotiate the debt. What is more unlike Duflot speech that is small with strong words because of the volition to be easy reading and the desire of being poignant and influent, the New York Times use very moderate worlds. I can feel that each documents do not