According to case study we can define two different contributions of the managers toward the achievement of the store’s purpose. Clearly we have identified two managers’ attitudes to their employee and the way of managing them. Apparently in this case Theory X and Theory Y are taken into action. In our case Dan represents Theory X a negative view of human nature that assumes individuals generally dislike work, are irresponsible, and require close supervision to do their job. So in order to contribute effectively Dan needs to be responsible for organizing the elements of productivity. Also he should respect employees, because this is a process of directing their efforts, motivating them, controlling their actions, and modifying their behavior to fit the needs of the organization. In case of Dan-bully boss, he is not motivating his employees, for example Alex complains toward his supervisor and dissatisfied with his job. Among them a long distance power. In other words Dan needs apply to active intervention by management; otherwise his people would be passive-even resistant to organizational needs. They must be therefore be persuaded, rewarded, and controlled. Their activities must be directed, which is not happened with Alex. So the management task is simply getting things done, through other people. We can conclude the contribution, by seeing the performance of employee. The other case for Stephanie and her supervisor Jonathan Theory Y is obvious, more positive view of human nature and assumes individuals are generally industrious, creative, and able to assume responsibility and exercise self-control in