Free Essay

Ethical Dilemma of Adultery

In: Social Issues

Submitted By deviphillip
Words 2475
Pages 10


1. Henri Fayol 1 – 2

2. F. W. Taylor 3

3. Frank and Lillian Gilbreth 4

4. Henry L. Gantt 5

5. Lyndell Urwick 6 -7

6. Max Weber 8

7. Abraham Maslow 9

8. Frederick Herzberg 10

9. Kenneth Boulding 11

10. Douglas Mc Gregor 12




11. Theorists and Theories in Management.

Henri Fayol (1841-1925): was French and began working at the age of nineteen as a French engineer and director of mines. In 1888 he joined a company b the name of Comambault Director. This company was in difficulty and under the leadership of Fayol, he was able to help the company grow and prosper under his leadership. He worked at this one company for the entire work life and returned after his seventy-seventh birthday. Upon retirement Henri Fayol published his work , a comprehension theory of administration. He described and classified management roles and pre was processes. Others recognized his work and he was used as reference in discourse about management.

Fayol’s five functions about management roles and actions are:

1. To forecast ad plan - prevoyance: this is to examine the future and draw up plans of actions.

2. To organize: build up the structure, material and human of the undertaking

3. To command: maintain activity among the personnel.

4. To co-ordinate: bind together, unify and harmonize activity effort.

5. T control: see that everything occurs in the conformity with policy and practice.

Fayol also identified fourteen principles for organizations design and effective administration. They are:

1. Specialization/division of labour

2. Authority with corresponding responsibility

3. Discipline

4. Unify of command

5. Unity of direction

6. Subordination of individual interest to the genera interest.

7. Remuneration of staff

8. Centralization

9. Scalar chain/line of authority

10. Order

11. Equity of tenure

12. Stability

13. Initiative

14. Esprit de corps

Fayol was the first to achieve a genuine theory of management. However he has come under criticism over the last twenty years because his principles were not designed to cope with modern conditions of rapid change and increased employee participation in the decision-making processes of the organization.

Frederick Winslow Taylor (FW Taylor 1856-1915): was born in the Boston , Massachusetts. Most of is lf was spent working on problems of achieving greater efficiency on the shop floor. His career began as an apprentice in engineering. However, he later moved to Mid Vale Steel Company, where during the course of eleven years moved from labourer to shop superintendent. It was during this time that he developed his ideas from scientific management. In 889 he left Midvale to work from Bethlehem steel company, where he consolidated is ideas and conducted some of his most famous experiments in improving labour productivity. Taylor, though experience as a worker and as a manager was convinced that workers put minimal effort into their daily work. He described this as ‘soldering’. He subdivided soldering into ‘natural soldiering’ which is man’s tendency to take things easy, and ‘systematic soldering’ which is deliberate and organized restruction of the work-rate by the employees.

The scientific approach to management, as outlined by Taylor required the following steps:-

1. Develop a science for each operation to replace opinions and rule-of-thumb.

2. Determine accurately from science, the correct time and method for each job.

3. Set up a suitable organization to take all responsibility for the workers except that of actual job performance.

4. Select and train workers.

5. Accept that management itself be governed y the science developed for each operation and surrender to arbitrary power over worker i.e cooperate with them.

After a three year period, Taylor and his colleagues reviewed the extent of their success at the Bethlehem Works. The results were that the work of 400-600 men was being done by 140, handling cost were reduced by half and the labourer received on average of 60% more than their colleagues in neighbouring firms.

Frank and Lillian Gilbreth: were married in 104. They were both the lecturers at Purdue University, and were partners in the management firms Gilbreth Inc. They had twelve children. They collaborated on the development of motion study as an engineering and management technique. Frank was very interested in the relationship between human beings and human effort. Frank, from his start in the brick laying industry, observed that workers had their own style of working, and that no two used the same style. In his study of bricklayers, he noticed that they did not always use the same motions while working. These observations led him to seek one best way to perform tasks. He invented the scaffold, so that the worker could be at the correct level, and shelf on the scaffold can accommodate bricks and mortar, thereby saving time to bend down and pick up each brick. As a result of the many improvements made, he was able to reduce the number of motions made in the laying of a brick from 18 to 5. The study of tasks movements, or motion study was a development of Taylor’s ideas and represented the Gilbreth’s major contribution to basic management techniques.

Henry Lawrence Gantt: was born in Maryland USA. He graduated from Mc Donogh School in 1878 and attended John Hopkins College. He worked as a teacher and draftsman, then he pursued mechanical engineering. In 1887, he joined FW Taylor in the leveraging of the theory of scientific management at Midvale Steel and Bethlehem Steel where the worked together until 1893. Gantt’s ideas on the rewards for labour made him a notable figure in his day. He is the best remembered for is charts. The Gantt chart originally showed the extent to which tasks had been achieved. It was divided horizontally into hours, days or weeks with the tasks marked out in a straight line across the appropriate numbers of hours or days. It was easy to assess actual and planned performance from the chart. Gantt introduced a payment system where performance of all the work allocated qualified the individual for a handsome bonus. Gantts, unlike the Gilbreth did not believe that there was ‘one best way’, but only a way which seems best at the moment. Gantt’s approach to scientific management left some discussion initiative to the workers, unlike the theories of the Taylor and the Gilbreth’s .

Lyndell f Urwick: was an author on the subject of administration and management. He worked in the armed forces and business consultancy. He believed that the only way modern man could control his social organizations as by applying rules and principles. He wrote ‘the elements of administration on 1947. He developed his principles on his own interpretation of structure and operations of organizations. He develops a ‘code of good practiced’ which he felt would lead t success in administration if followed.

Urwicks ten principles of organizations:

1. The principle of the objective-the overall purpose or objective is the raison d’etre of every organization.

2. The principle of specialization-one group, one function!

3. He principle of co-ordination-the process of organizing is primarily to ensure coordination.

4. The principle of authority-every group should have a supreme authority with clear line of authority to other members f the group

5. The principle f responsibility –the superior I absolutely responsible for the acts of his subordinates.

6. The principles of definition-jobs, with their dues and relationships, should be clearly defined.

7. The principle of correspondence-authority should be commensurate with responsibility.

8. The span of control- work no one should be responsible for more than 5 or 6 direct subordinates whose work interlocked.

9. The principle of balance-the various units of the organization should be kept in balance.

10. The principle of continuity the structure should provide for the continuation of activities.

Max Weber (18644-1920): was a Sociologist. He is considered by some to be the father of sociology. Weber used moral ideas to form an idea type bureaucracy hierarchy, impersonality, written code of conduct, promotion based on achievement, specialized division of labor and efficiency. He wanted to find out why people in the organization obeyed those in authority over them. He concluded that there were three types of legitimate authority: traditional, charismatic and rational-legal. Weber ascribed the term ‘bureaucracy’ to ration-legal authority, which exists in most organization today. The main features of bureaucracy according to Weber are as follows:

The main features of bureaucracy according to Weber are as follows:

1. A continuous organization of functions bound by rules.

2. Specified spheres of competence ie the specialization of work, the degree of authority allocated and the rules of governing the exercise of authority.

3. A hierarchical arrangement of offices (jobs) is subject o control by the next higher level

4. Appointments to offices are made on grounds of technical competence.

5. The separation of officials from the ownership of the organization.

6. Official positions exist in their own right and join holders have no right to a particular position.

7. Rules decisions and actions are formulated and recorded in writing.

Weber’s thinking on bureaucracy was dominated by his view of how rational it was. He placed emphasis on the structural aspects of the organization.

ABRAHAM MASLOW – was born in New York in 1908. His PhD in Psychology in 1934 at the University of Wisconsin formed the basis for his motivational research, initially studying monkeys. He later moved to New York’s Brooklyn College where he developed the Hierarchy of Needs model 1940 -1950’s. This is valid for understanding human motivation, management training and personal development.

Maslow theorized that employees have a basic human need and a right to strive for self-actualization, just as much as the corporate directors and owners do. The successful organizations and employers will be those who genuinely care about, understand encourage and enable their peoples personal growth – way beyond traditional work related training and development, but rather towards self – actualization. The best modern employers and organizations are beginning to learn that sustainable success is built on a serious and compassionate commitment to helping people identify, pursue and reach their own personal unique potential. When people grow as people, they automatically become more effective and valuable as employees.

FREDERICK HERZBERG (1923 – 2000) was born in Massachusetts. In the late 1950’s he conducted studies in Pittsburg into the motivation of people at work. He identified five major motivators:

1. Nature of task

2. Achievement

3. Recognition

4. Responsibility and

5. Advancement

Herzberg also identified ‘hygiene factors’ which are salary bonuses commission, working conditions, acceptability of supervision, pleasantness of working environment and job security.

He believed that good hygiene factors help to maintain a person’s feelings about work, but do not themselves motivate, as a big pay rise soon becomes accepted as the norm.

KENNETH BOULDING (1900 – 1993) was born in Liverpool, England. He attended Oxford University and was granted U.S. Citizenship in 1948. From 1949 to 1967, he joined the faculty of the University of Michigan. In 1967, he joined the faculty of the University of Colorado at Boulder, where he remained until his retirement. He was a prolific writer and an academician of world stature. He emphasized that human economic and other behavior is embedded in a larger interconnected system. He defined a management approach called ‘Systems Management’ in which organizations were to be seen as social systems where inputs (money, materials etc.) are processed into (value added) outputs which are goods and services.

Boulding believed that the absence of a committed effort to the right kind of social science research and understanding, the human species might well be doomed to extinction.

DOUGLAS MC GREGOR (1906 – 1964) was an American Social Psychologist who proposed the famous X-Y Theory in his 1960 Book ‘The Human Side of Enterprise’. The X-Y Theory is a simple reminder of the natural rules for managing people.

Theory X (‘authoritarian management’ style) proposes that:

1. The average person dislikes work and will avoid it if he/she can.

2. Therefore most people must be forced, with the threat of punishment to work towards organizational objectives.

3. The average person prefers to be directed, to avoid responsibility, is relatively unambitious and wants security above all else.

Theory Y (‘participative management’ style) suggests:

1. Effort in work is as natural as work and play.

2. People will apply self-control and self-direction in the pursuit of organizational objectives, without external control or threat of punishment.

3. Commitment to objectives is a function of rewards associated with their achievement.

4. People usually accept and often seek responsibility.

5. In industry, the intellectual potential of the average person is only partly utilized.

6. The capacity to use a high degree of imagination, ingenuity and creativity in solving organizational problems is widely, not narrowly, distributed in the population.


Public Sector – These are organizations owned and controlled by the state or government. The objectives of public sector organizations are:

1. To provide an essential service.

2. To provide its services cheaply or free of charge, therefore it is available to everybody.

3. Generally beneficial to society. It is good to have healthy and well educated people in the country.

PRIVATE SECTOR – These are organizations owned and controlled by private individuals and organizations eg. Retail stores. The objectives of the private sector organizations are:

1. To survive in a competitive market.

2. To maximize profits.

3. To make returns for their shareholders (dividends).


1. Private sector goals are less ambiguous than those in the public sector because they can be evaluated in terms of economic outcomes. The Public Sector leaders have to pursue multiple goals simultaneously.

2. There is more leadership turnover in the Public Sector than in private organizations. This is not only because of limits on time in Office, but also because administrative upheavals often lead to officials resigning voluntarily.

3. Public employees enjoy greater job security because of extensive grievance procedures.

4. Public Sector has an absence of market incentives.

5. Policy decisions in the Public Sector must be guided by what is indicated by law, while the Private Sector is managed under the rules of shareholders and corporate owners.

6. The beneficiary of the services offered b the public sector is the general public, while for the private sector, it is mostly the consuming public who uses the goods and services that they offer in return for profit.

7. The Private Sector is better at allocating resources efficiently, and provides better service to members of the public.

8. The priorities of the Public Sector are determined by the political process.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Ethical Dilemma

...Ethical dilemma: Indirectly Using Child Labor Child labor now becomes a complicated problem, which affects all regions of the world. According to the telegraph online, “Even at big company, as Apple, said that 91 children under the age of 16 were discovered to be working last year in ten Chinese factories owned by its suppliers. “ The company did not examine the suppliers, and the suppliers squeezed the child labor, finally, the company gets more profit. The ethical dilemma in this essay is that whether it is ethical for a company not to examine if they indirectly use the child labor. I will apply two ethical theories to this ethical dilemma, the Kantian ethics theory and the Utilitarianism theory. In the Kantian ethics theory, he says, “we should do the right thing regardless of reward or loss”, which is core ideas of his ethics theory. Furthermore, in his famous work Groundwork Metaphysics of Morality, he says, “Nothing is good in itself but the good will.” Additionally, in the Utilitarianism theory, it is roughly based on calculating or measuring benefits versus burdens. There are two core philosophers in the Utilitarianism theory, Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. I will explain this two theories and how the company fall into the dilemma as follows: Firstly, there is no doubt that it is an unethical matter. As for the Kantian ethics, he thinks there is no relationship between the purpose and ethics; whatever effect of the purpose is content, happy, or kind. We only...

Words: 1696 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Ethical Dilemma

...An Ethical Dilemma (Chapter 6) Lael Mathews has to decide between three different people to promote to manager. One is a thirty-four year old African American female, one is a fifty-seven year old Caucasian man, and the third one is a twenty-seven year old Asian American. They all have three different situations and problems of their own. Lael Mathews know each ones background which makes it even harder to make a decision as to which one deserves and will best fit the position. Liz is the thirty four year old African American who is divorced, has one child, been in the company four years, has a high energy level, and graduated in the lower half of her college class. Roy is the fifty seven year old Caucasian who is married, has three children, been with the company twenty years, energy level is average to low, and graduated in the top half of his class. And lastly Quang is the twenty-seven year old Asian American who is single, no kids, been with the company three years, works sixty hours a week, and graduated top three percent of her class. Advantages and Disadvantages of each Candidate Liz only really has maybe two advantages and that would be that if she was chosen she would be the first African American female to manager at that level and she has a high energy level meaning she is willing to put forth the effort. Now her disadvantages would be her academic credentials, her job experience, and the fact that her child has had many medical issues that could......

Words: 810 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Ethical Dilemma

...Ethical Dilemma Julieann Mills HCS/335 June 24, 2014 David Gallagher Ethical Dilemma Health care facilities are in need of individuals who are capable of decision-making without supervision. Physicians need medical assistants or licensed practical nurses to assist in daily clinical routine. Medical assistants and licensed practical nurses help physicians with patient charts and maintaining medical records. They also remind physicians of appointment times and patient prescription. The duties of medical assistants and LPNs are very complex that is why it is important for such professionals to execute their duties at the utmost standard. Jerry is in a situation where he refills a medication without the consent of Dr. Williams. Usually, patients will call for a refill of a prescription but will need the doctor’s approval. Jerry is a practicing LPN. He has the capability to call in prescriptions on behalf of patients. It would be a great idea if he just tried to contact Dr. Williams so that he can request the medication to a pharmacy. After the request, the pharmacy can dispense the medication to the patient. Jerry can check through the patient’s files and see if the medication is necessary for the patient to take. Jerry can also ask from other health care professionals to ensure if he has the authority to refill the......

Words: 821 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Ethical Dilemma

...was pretty sure she was a pseudo seizure patient. When it came to looking at what drugs she could be given, the only drug she was not allergic to was Morphine. When doing assessments on the patient, she would always say that her pain was an 8-9 before pain medication and a 7/10 after pain medication. Every 4 hours the patient would put her call light on and complain of pain. However, the patient showed no signs of pain as she was doing her hair and putting on makeup to look good for her boyfriend who was coming to see her soon. With the patient requesting pain medications frequently, showing no apparent signs of pain or seizure activity and allergic to every type of medication makes me suspicious of the patient drug seeking. So the ethical dilemma is should the patient be given pain medication when they requests it every 4 hrs, when not appearing to be in pain? The three options that I was alternating between were medicating the patient as ordered when they request it, give the patient half the dose ordered when they request it, or delay the patient’s dose to every 6 hours or not give it at all. The moral principles involved are autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence and accountability. Medicating the patient when they request it would be upholding to the principle of autonomy. Beneficence is an action done for the benefit of the patient. Administering pain medication upon request may be promoting good for the patient, as we want the patient to be pain free, which in......

Words: 1086 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Ethical Dilemma

...reputation, and was wondering what to do. And also he was concerned that if a new launch was announced, it would delay signing a contract with the Japanese customer. Since the construction and ongoing operation of each programmes were financed by venture capitalists who relied heavily on advance contract acquisition, any contract termination could end up the satellite company in bankruptcy. Moreover currently all the competitors had announced a launch date within six months of the ISI published launch date. Each company had to revise it once or twice due to technical snags and that had stalled or terminated their contracts with the customers. So Jim was in a dilemma where he was caught between the decision of the company management and an ethical issue. Q1) What are the sources of the factors, which created the ethical dilemma? 1. Competitors might aggressively publishes launch dates and that can jeopardise the business of ISI. 2. No contracts will then be available for ISI for any launch later than the launch of competitors. 3. Each time a company had revised its launch date, ongoing international contract negotiations with that company had been stalled or terminated. 4. Venture capitalists relied heavily on advance contract acquisition to ensure the success of their investment. Any contract cancellation will end up the firm in bankruptcy. 5. Industry practice is that it publish optimistic completion dates that are rarely met and it is common that the......

Words: 632 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

An Ethical Dilemma

...Case Study: An Ethical Dilemma Name Institution Case Study: An Ethical Dilemma Question 1 Dr. Vaji would like to meet with Leo in order to discuss ways in which adolescent clients may be retained. Also, he wants to help him improve his treatment skills. Unfortunately, he does not know how much the information he was provided with by the other graduate students might influence their conversation and final supervisory report. As a result, he finds himself in an ethical dilemma because he is concerned on how to grade the student from his earlier reports or should he take into account the information he has just received from the other students. Apparently, he was not convinced enough by Leo Watson’s thought paper, so he advised him to incorporate more of the findings on ethnic discrimination into his papers and provide more complex perspectives. In other words, Watson was to provide more information from viewing the world through another person’s eyes. As a result, he might have taken the idea far enough to start behaving in the same manner he had described the ethnic minority would, which was prone to violence. On the other hand, Leo Watson as a person might possess the attributes described to Dr. Vaji by the other students as derogatory, harassing, and insulting to other ethnic groups. Seemingly, the nature of this dilemma has been framed by some APA Ethical principles. First, integrity plays a part simply because it demands honesty, accuracy, and truthfulness from......

Words: 1466 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Ethical Dilemma-Adultery

...Ethical Dilemma-Adultery My conclusion is that adultery is unethical. In the following rational argument, I will support why adultery is unethical. The term adultery is defined as voluntary sexual intercourse between a married man or woman and a partner other than the legal spouse (Collins English Dictionary, What makes adultery unethical is that it involves the breaking of a promise. One of the vows two parties promise each other when they get married is that they will abstain from sexual relationships with other people. Because of this promise both spouses have the expectation that the other will behave in conformity with it. Thus, when one of the parties has sexual intercourse with a third person he or she breaks that promise about sexual relationships which was made when the marriage was entered into, and defeats the expectations of exclusivity by the spouse. The breaking of this promise leads to the intentional infliction of substantial pain by one spouse to another. The immorality of such things as breaking a promise and deceiving someone and the action of adultery is, in a strong sense of prima facie, wrong or unjustified. According to Raja Halwani, in his book titled Sex and Ethics: Essays on sexuality, virtue and the good life, the unique wrongness of adultery results from adultery being an assault on a person’s self-conception and self-worth as a human being emotionally, sexually and erotically. It is rational to want to......

Words: 929 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Ethical Dilemma

...Ethical Dilemma CJA 324 June 29, 2015 Ethical Dilemma According to Your dictionary (1996-2015) an ethical dilemma is defined as a situation where someone must make a choice between two or more options, all of which will result in a negative outcome. Today we are faced with many ethical dilemmas that force us to examine the situation and surrounding events in depth to discover a better way of doing things. One such ethical dilemma is the legal age to vote in elections. The Constitution The twenty-sixth Amendment to the Constitution guarantees every American “the right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age” (The National Constitution Center, n.d.). In America the legal adult age is considered 18 years. As an adult, an 18 year old will pay taxes on income he or she has earned. They pay sales tax on items they have purchased. They are old enough to drive a car and to join the military. These are the arguments many have given in favor of lowering the voter legal age form 18 years to 16 years, but there is another side to the story – one of opposition to lowering the age and in favor of returning the legal age to voting rights to 21 years of age as originally set forth by the United States Constitution. The United States Constitution was adopted in 1789, at which time voting was reserved for male property owners ages 21 and......

Words: 1093 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Ethical Dilemma

...Legal and Ethical Principles in Health Care 08/19/2015 Ethics is a study which seeks to understand the nature, purposes, justification, and the founding principles of moral rules and the systems they comprise. Ethics deals with values relating to human conduct. It focuses on the rightness and wrongness of actions, as well as the goodness and badness of motives and ends. In the healthcare industry, ethics is about anticipating and recognizing healthcare dilemmas and making good judgments and decisions based on the patient’s needs and wishes. Also ethics is about the universal values that work in unison with the laws of the land, our Constitution, and where the Constitution remains silent, we rely on the ability of caregivers to make the right choices using the wisdom of Solomon to do good. An ethical dilemma has risen here in given situation. It can occur whenever a choice involves giving up something good and suffering something bad, no matter what course of action is taken. Ethical dilemmas often require caregivers to make decisions that may break some ethical norm or contradict some ethical values. In the given situation, decision must be made depending upon various dimensions of dilemma and the issues related to the same; and of course the ethical principles: base for decision making. Dimensions of given Ethical dilemma: * Relevant information Here, the information given about the patient includes that a male patient is 96 years of age......

Words: 1310 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Ethical Dilemma

...MANAGER’S ETHICAL DILEMMA -- # 1 1、Ethical Dilemma The primary problem is whether Sally Cook should accept Bossey’s offer to get higher value for her stock. Then the question is what Cook should do? 2、Stakeholders ① Ralph Bossey: He has the right to use the way of takeover to make money, even if it will cause harmful effect on employees in that company and development of community health. ② Stockholders (like Sally Cook): They have the right to choose to accept the attractive offer from Bossey or not. ③ Employees: They have the right to guarantee a stable job in the company. 3、 Alternative Actions and Consequences. ① Accept the offer from Bossey. If Cook accepted the offer, she can get double current market value for her holdings. But it will cause lay off many employees in Graham Corporation. It can also restrain company’s nutritional improvements and product innovation. Finally, it will influence the development of community health. ② Not accept the offer. If Cook does not accept the offer, it will benefit many employees and community health. But she has to extend the working time to gain a better life to eliminate her financial worry. 4、 Analysis From my opinion, I think Cook should not accept the offer from Bossey. The following reasons are the factors that Cook should consider before she makes final decision. From a legal point of view, what Bossey does is legal. The way he uses to take over the company is also legal, but his action will have negative effect...

Words: 654 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Ethical Dilemmas

...What primary relationships do you see between legal and ethical issues faced by nurses in their practice? How would you explain these relationships to others? What would you say are at least two ethical dilemmas that are often faced by nurses in their daily practice? Explain how accountability and responsibility play a role when nurses face with these dilemmas. One of the most well known ethical dilemmas that nurses can face in their career is their patient's belief system. One example is the familiar dilemma of when a patient has a strong religious belief that interferes with sound evidence base medical practice. For example Jehovah Witnesses forbid blood transfusions under any circumstance. Even when it's the difference between life and death, the answer will always be no blood transfusion. Most knowledgeable and experience nurses will attempt to explain the necessity and benefits of the blood transfusions, but it's also understood that it's the nurse's job to support patient's rights. Nurses often face unique challenges because of the amount of time they actually spend with patients and their family. Nurses are typically the ones who actually witnesses the patient's or family's struggle to make crucial decisions. Most often nurses are engaged with the patient and their family more than any other healthcare provider. One key fact to recognize is nurses bring with them their personal values, which at times can be in direct conflict with what their patient......

Words: 942 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Ethical Dilemmas

...Ethical Dilemmas Kevin Brock April 26, 2015 CWV 101: Christian Worldview Instructor: Peter Rasor People from all walks of life face many ethical dilemmas. These dilemmas have consequences. Our worldview determines how we deal with these dilemmas, and guides us to the right decisions. In this essay, I will examine an ethical issues through my Christian worldview. I will also present other viewpoints, and compare them to mine. Ethical Dilemma This dilemma involves my friend Paul. Paul has been working very hard in practice, and the weight room and has earned a starting position on his team. The team has recently been winning more, and many of the players are using a new performance enhancing drug. Paul’s teammates are always reminding him that it is not a banned substance, and the coach has turned a blind eye to the whole issue. Paul told me that his coach is making some changes, and he may lose his starting position. He is starting to think about actually taking this drug so he does not lose his spot. The dilemma is that Paul could just take the drug, and get to keep his position as a starter. Since the drug is not listed as banned, and the coach ignores its use, it should a good choice. No one will ever know. There are a few things that could be done to resolve this dilemma: * I could tell Paul to stand his ground, and not take the drug. He could let his talent stand on its own. I would tell him that taking the drugs could be dangerous, and its simply wrong...

Words: 1311 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Ethical Dilemma

...Ethical Dilemma (Author’s name) (Institutional Affiliation) Abstract This research paper seeks to resolve a particular case of an ethical dilemma. This has been necessitated by the fact that ethical dilemmas are a recurrent part of life. Moreover, ethical dilemmas have become a key point of argument in the field of ethics and interestingly, philosophy as well (Garsten & Hernes, 2009). As an inividual, I find myself facing moral dilemma situation quite frequently which makes the exploration of this subject a fascinating intrigue. This exhaustive research thus attempts to integrate all the possible actions that can be undertaken to lead towards the understanding of ethical dilemma. Methodologies used to accomplish this include the three stage ethical dilemma solving process that duly applies two main approaches. These approaches are consequentialist and deontological which have been widely applied to give step by step details on how to handle the given ethical dilemma. The article dissects on subsequent decision making after thorough strive to balance between what is morally acceptable within a person’s surroundings and self interests entrenched in a human being. A thorough discussion on the particular viewpoints of ethical dilemma has unearthed the common result of individuals getting torn between self morals and societal expectations.. Finally, the research concludes that there is a need to evaluate decisions based on viewpoints......

Words: 1725 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

An Ethical Dilemma

...| An Ethical Dilemma | | Mary Ryan 8/27/2012 | Ethical dilemmas come up often within the workplace and can be difficult to handle when an employee needs to choose between what’s right and what’s wrong based on their own morals and principals. Handling ethical issues should be pursued in a steady and cautious approach towards matters that can potentially be dangerous or illegal. (Mayhew) One ethical dilemma that I was caught in the middle of left me in a position where I was almost forced into firing a person because of their sexual orientation. I felt this was an unethical request, and really made me think twice about the company I was working for and representing. A few years ago I worked for a company as a home manager. I was in the process of hiring some people to staff my home and when I picked all the candidates I went over all of them with the owner, who was also my boss. I ended up hiring in about five people and only one lasted. Sally, the lady that I had hired was an outstanding worker. She would come in early or stay late if I needed her to. She had no problems with switching her days around if another worker had something going on. Sally worked great with the clients and the clients loved working with her. She learned the job very quickly and was just an awesome employee. A few months after she had been working there, we had a huge crisis happen at the home. I was out of town with another manager working on opening up another group home and......

Words: 1270 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Ethical Dilemma

...By definition, an ethical dilemma is a situation that will often involve an apparent conflict between moral imperatives, in which to obey one would result in transgressing another. When one combines this definition with the many problems employees and management face on a daily basis, you are bound to have plenty of examples for many different kinds of businesses, regardless of what the business is or the line of work. This internal conflict that people experience can cause many issues in today’s workplace, and in the next few paragraphs I will explain how, why, and produce some examples. One of the most popular examples of an ethical dilemma is the story of the man whose family is starving and he steals a loaf of bread for his family’s survival. At its core, this example covers all the bases: conflicting imperatives with regards to a need for food and breaking the law by stealing the food. There can be arguments made on both sides with no clear decision on what the right thing to do would be. When translated into today’s work environment, employed persons have conflicting thoughts and feelings every day because they face problems at work but also in their personal lives as well. Anytime one has two completely different sets of problems their chances for an ethical dilemma will rise. According to Puja Lalwani, who writes articles for, “A lot of people believe that there is no room for ethics in the workplace. In a world of fierce competition where everyone...

Words: 1751 - Pages: 8