No two people have the same view of ethics and morality. By nature, ones own decisions about what is morally right or wrong is based on each person's own situation, experience and views. As such, there are different ways in which one can judge whether or not different behaviors are ethical or unethical. Three areas that display this variance include virtue theory, utilitarianism and deontological ethics. While most examination of ethical validity comes through analysis of a particular action or idea, virtue theory places an emphasis on the ethical standing of the source. It examines whether the person committing the act is behaving in a manner that exhibits good character and is of high moral standing. A common display of where virtue ethics have a place can be found in a student standing up for his or herself and others by pushing away a bully who was tormenting others. While the specific action of pushing another student may be ethically questionable, most would likely find virtue in the courage displayed by standing up to the bully. Utilitarianism takes the approach that the greater good is best served when the majority benefit from an action. As such, actions that provide positive outcomes for a larger group than those that feel a negative burden are deemed to be ethical under utilitarianism. Utilitarianism can be easily seen on almost every commercial for pharmaceutical drugs. Each medication promises to cure major issues for patients, ranging from depression, to restless leg, to seasonal allergies. Most also list a small number of side effects that will impact a portion of the populous - but, because the majority of those who take the medicine will benefit, its production and promotion is permitted. A third way that ethics can be viewed is displayed through deontoogical ethics - or ones commitment to adhering to his or her ethical duty. It is