Personal differences and preference can greatly impact organizational ethics especially in medical field. Many times, medical decision such as courses of treatment is based on the treating physician experience which sometimes includes physician’s preference of certain medication over another. Pharmaceutical companies often visit hospital and clinic in hope of encouraging physician to prescribe their line of medication over their competitor. The encouragement may include free sample of the medication, notepad, pen, or even an out of town seminar. The seminar is often paid for by the pharmaceutical company that may include a few hours of actual seminar and the rest of the weekend free to leisure activities, according to Carollo (2010), “pharmaceutical companies paid out more than $250 million to some 17,000 doctors and nursed across the country in 2009 and 2010”. Most if not all drugs have side-effect and drugs used to treat the same symptom may have different side effect depending on its ingredient. A physician preference of one type of drug over another, whether it’s due to pass experience of prescribing the drugs or other benefit provided by the pharmaceutical company that come along with prescribing the drugs. Two physicians treating the same symptoms may prescribe two different course of treatment or medication based on the different experience each physician have. Physician A may have prescribed Medication 1 to a patient in pass. That patient may have reacted badly to medication and medication may not have been as effective as the physician have hope. After that experience Physician A decided to try Medication 2 in treating the symptoms. Medication 2 worked more effective with fewer side effects. If Physician A is the head of the department and is in charge of ordering medication, Physician A is more likely to keep a larger inventory of Medication 2 based on past