Free Essay

Eu Supremacy

In: Other Topics

Submitted By Crackersmum
Words 2203
Pages 9
When asked to critically discuss the statement: “The Supremacy or Primacy principle is central to understanding the unique nature of the European Union Legal Order”, there are a few things we must first understand as this statement actually asks us three questions. Firstly what is the “unique nature” of the European Union (EU) Legal Order? Second, what is the supremacy or primacy principle? And finally, how important is the supremacy or primacy principle in achieving the goals of the European Union Legal Order? In my answer I will not separate these issues out, but instead I will attempt to answer the question with these issues in mind.

According to Hendrik Jan van Eikema Hommes “if a multiplicity of legal rules displays a juridical unity, we can speak of a legal order or a legal system.” The European Union represents a supranational legal order within the specific fields delegated to the institutions and the competence of the community. This supranational federation is a new political entity which works above the individual national governments which make up its membership. The European Union is considered unique in this respect due to the level of integration which raises the Union from being merely an international agreement to being a supranational entity. Martin Steinfield describes the EU is a “federal order of sovereign states that has to grapple with legal political and economic relations in the wider world”. He also argues that “mixity” is at the heart of the European Union since the union must balance the integrity of its own new legal order against the sovereignty of member states. “Mixity” however doesn’t explain how conflict is resolved within the EU between higher policies and member states. “Mixity” doesn’t explain how the EU has attained harmony and uniformity.

Supremacy, in legal and political terms, refers to the hierarchy of authority or the superseding power that one entity might exert over another. This hierarchy is important for deciding which of two or more conflicting rules should be obeyed. Richard White commenting on Hans Kelsen’s views on the separation of powers says that when “a constitution divides or distributes law-creation and application between different institutions, a hierarchy is inevitably thereby instituted (to ensure finality and certainty in that process)”. While the member states of the European Union (EU) have steadfastly refrained and shied away from a formal constitution, it is arguable that through the ratification of treaties as a higher source of law, they have in effect created a constitution anyway. Chris Thornhill suggests that “although its attempts at formal constitution writing have to date remained inconclusive, the EU is marked by a historically specific and even sui generis constitutional order”. In studying the European Union, supremacy refers to the relationship between EU law and its institutions and the national laws and institutions of member states. Supremacy, in this context, is concerned with how conflict is resolved since this is how consistency and uniformity within the union can be achieved. The foundations of the European Union as we know it today are rooted in the Schuman declaration of 1950 and the European Coal and Steel Community born from this proposal. In the beginning, this community was an international organisation of six nations co-operating to "make war not only unthinkable but materially impossible." Matej Avbelj comments that this “integration was clearly not yet a union” as the founding states retained their sovereignty in its entirety. The progress of this community from an international organisation into the Union we know today, although revolutionary, was achieved through a slow evolution and sustained growth and expansion to both deepen and widen the powers. However the landmark cases of Van Gend en Loos and Costa v ENEL are commonly attributed to be the birth of the concept of the supremacy of the community. Matej Avbelj points to the European Court of Justice as the “chief initiator”. The ECJ then is an important tool for the protection of the European Union and its higher status. There exists, although silently, an acceptance that “the European Court of Justice, [may act] de facto as a Constitutional Court in comity with national courts”

In Van Gend en Loos the judgement refers to the community as “a new legal order in international law, for whose benefits the states have limited their sovereign rights”. In Costa v ENEL the judgement goes further to say that the EC Treaty has created “its own legal system which… became an integral part of the legal systems of the member states and which their courts are bound to apply”. The judgement also says that the member states have both limited and transferred certain powers of their sovereignty to the community. It is clear that these cases, along with subsequent European Court of Justice judgements, highlight a considerable transformation in the nature of a European community that had perhaps not been previously expected. It is easy to see in hindsight that the doctrine of supremacy of the European Union is a key factor in shaping what is now the European Union and various analysts congratulate “the role of the European Union as a model for supranational endeavour”. However it is likely, despite Shuman’s declaration of supranationalism, that a new European order was an unforeseen consequence, hence the difficulty of national courts in Britain, Germany, Italy and others, in addressing the issue of national and supranational sovereignty. “Over 40 years after Van Gend & Loos the doctrine about invoking norms of EU law is still not fully settled. In particular there is still a lively debate on the exact scope of the key concepts of primacy and direct effect.”

Despite the obvious importance of the doctrine of supremacy, it was not mentioned within any of the treaties. The concept was developed by the European Court of Justice as a logical consequence of the member states agreements to take appropriate measures to ensure fulfilment of their obligations, but “like several other provisions in EU law, Article 10 EC is but a special expression of good faith”. The Treaty of Lisbon does at least mention the primacy of treaty law over the laws of member states however it notes that this is well settled case law and not a treaty invention or design. There is another string to the primacy bow however. Although international law is intergovernmental in nature, “this alone has never been a reason to deny that those instruments may have important consequences in the legal order of the Member States… consequences which can be brought about by individuals relying on these norms.” This is known as direct effect. Direct effect is essentially the rule of law in the European Union. The basic premise of the rule of law is that governing bodies are also bound by the laws therefore, as well as creating rights and obligations for the national governments of member states, rights and obligations are created for the citizens of those states. The landmark case of Van Gend en Loos saw the Court of Justice confirm that individuals did inherit enforceable rights and gives guidelines on how direct effect should apply to individual citizens from Treaty Articles, Regulations and Decisions. Directives are different because they rely on the separate member states to apply them. It was through the growth of these rights, and the use of direct effect, that the supremacy of EU law was established.

In the UK, membership of the EC was ratified in the European Communities Act 1972. Section 2 of this act also incorporated all existing EU law in the UK. This created a problem for British judges however since, although this new act would automatically repeal and over-rule previous existing law in the UK, the UK Parliament is supreme and so later enactments should also repeal and usurp any contradictory statements of the 1972 Europe Communities Act. At the very least, a new method of statutory interpretation would be required in order to construe a compatibility with EU law. However Lord Denning noted in a number of cases from the late 1970s and early 1980s what a growing problem this was since “the Treaty is like an incoming tide. It flows into the estuaries and up the rivers. It cannot be held back.” In a later case, Lord Denning said that “if the time should come when our Parliament deliberately passes an Act with the intention of repudiating the Treaty or any provisions in it… then I should have thought that it would be the duty of our courts to follow the statute of our Parliament”. This statement would have the effect of double-edged sword, acting both as a platitude to the UK judiciary who were uncomfortable with the huge constitutional change taking place but also to recognise the importance of EU law that it could not be reversed accidentally or as an oversight by parliament but rather only with a deliberate intention of repudiating the Treaty. The attitude of the UK Judiciary however has been modified by more forward thinking judges with a less entrenched view of UK Parliamentary supremacy. In 1990, Hoffman J accepts that “Entry in to the EC meant that Parliament surrendered its sovereign right to legislate contrary to the provisions of the Treaty””.

It’s clear then that the supremacy of the EU, as maintained by the European Court of Justice, has been essential for what Richard White describes as “finality and certainty”. The uniformity of the law, the rule of law and the enforceability, or acceptance, of the law has allowed the EU to grow into its status as a supranational body. However the enforceability of this law is not limitless. Lord Bridge was sure to note that any surrender of sovereignty under the act of 1972 was of course merely “voluntary”. The nature of each of the sovereign states of the EU is that, although the EU exerts a supranational power, the agreements are essentially international treaties and are reversible. The UK, for example, could extricate itself from the EU any time it wished through an act of its own supreme parliament. Gerhard van der Shcyff argues that “It might even be argued that the only real sovereignty that still accrues to Member States is the power to cancel their EU membership” according to article 50(1) of the TEU. The fact that it does not do this is not due to the supremacy of EU law or the European Union Legal Order, but more to do with the success of the European Union. Hoffman J, in 1990, stated that the “partial surrender of sovereignty was more than compensated for by the advantages of membership”. So together this relative success and the supremacy of EU law over member state national law has helped to forge and create the supranational body of the EU today.

--------------------------------------------
[ 1 ]. Hendrik Jan van Eikema Hommes, ‘Legal order and Legal Principles’
[ 2 ]. Martin Steinfield, ‘Publication Review: Mixed Agreements Revisited: The EU and its Member States in the World’ Edited by Christophe Hillion and Panos Koutrakos CLJ 228
[ 3 ]. IBID
[ 4 ]. Richard White, ‘Separation of powers and legislative supremacy’ 2011 LQR 456, 465
[ 5 ]. Chris Thornhill, ‘The formation of a European Constitution; an approach form historical-poitical sociology’ 2012 Int JLC 354, 355
[ 6 ]. ECSC Treaty of Paris 1951
[ 7 ]. Schuman, Robert. Pour l'Europe. Paris 1963
[ 8 ]. Matej Avbelj, ‘Theory of European Union’ 2011 EL Rev 818, 824
[ 9 ]. Tony Storey and Chris Turner, Unlocking EU Law (3rd Edn, Hodder Education 2011) 10
[ 10 ]. Case 26/62 Expeditie Onderneming van Gend en Loos v Netherlands Inland Revenue Administration [1963] ECR 1
[ 11 ]. Case 6/64 Flaminio Costa v Ente Nazionale per l’Energia Elattrica [1964] ECR 585
[ 12 ]. Matej Avbelj, ‘Theory of European Union’ 2011 EL Rev 818, 825
[ 13 ]. Chris Thornhill, ‘The formation of a European Constitution; an approach form historical-poitical sociology’ 2012 Int JLC 354, 355
[ 14 ]. Case 26/62 Expeditie Onderneming van Gend en Loos v Netherlands Inland Revenue Administration [1963] ECR 1
[ 15 ]. Case 6/64 Flaminio Costa v Ente Nazionale per l’Energia Elattrica [1964] ECR 585
[ 16 ]. R.C. Van Caenegem, ‘Constitutional history: chance or grand design?’ 2009 ECL Review 447, 463
[ 17 ]. Koen Lenaerts and Tim Corthaut, ‘ Of birds in hedges: the role of primacy in invoking norms of EU law’ 2006 31(3) EL Rev 287
[ 18 ]. Stephan Bitter, ‘Loyalty in the European Union. A review’ 3 German Law Journal (2002)
[ 19 ]. Treaty of Lisbon 2007 C306/01 Declaration 17
[ 20 ]. Koen Lenaerts and Tim Corthaut, ‘ Of birsds in hedges: the role of primacy in invoking norms of EU law 2006 31(3) EL Rev 287, 288
[ 21 ]. Bulmer v Bollinger [1974] 3 WLR 202
[ 22 ]. MacCarthys v Smith [1979] WLR 1189
[ 23 ]. Stoke-on-Trent City Council v B&Q Plc [1990] 3 CMLR 897
[ 24 ]. Richard White, ‘Separation of powers and legislative supremacy’ 2011 LQR 456, 465
[ 25 ]. Factortame Ltd. and Others v Secretary of State for Transport [1990] 2 A.C. 85
[ 26 ]. Gerhard van der Schyff, ‘The constitutional relationship between the European Union and its Member States: the role of national identity in article 4(2) TEU’ 2012 EL Rev 563
[ 27 ]. Stoke-on-Trent City Council v B&Q Plc [1990] 3 CMLR 897

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Eth 125 Final

...Final Project: Race and Your Community ETH/125 Week 9 Seffan Bune Idaho is a Midwestern state which I have called home for 28 of my 29 years. For the most part Idaho is a state that could be considered lacking in cultural diversity the majority of the population is white, religious, and conservative something that tends not to lend itself it a culture of many different people but that trend is changing at a rapid pace. I was born at St. Luke’s Regional Medical Center in the North End of Boise ID and have stayed in the North End for most of my life, this area is a bastion of liberalism in Idaho and in my opinion it is the most culturally diverse in the state. Because of the vast lacking of real cultural diversity I have also chosen to interview Jin You who is of Chinese ancestry and moved to Boise from the Sichuan province. Boise is a beautiful city known to many as the City Of Trees but there is a lack of cultural diversity that was apparent to me at a young age. I remember that throughout my childhood I grew up around people like me the same skin color, culture based on European ancestry, and family life which tended to be the standard nuclear family unit. I grew up in a relatively normal household and being the only child I was given the opportunity to attend Catholic school since the fifth grade. I found that I was like everyone else (except for my religious views) there was no one who really stood out as different other than the jocks, nerds, and cool kids. It......

Words: 2104 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

1960's Diary Entries

...1960's Diary Entries Witness to the assassination of Malcolm X HIS 135 Dear Diary, I am one of many to witness the assassination of Malcolm X. On February 21, 1965 today we have lost a legacy. Malcolm X was a strong speaker, and was moved by many African Americans. He did so much to make us feel connected with our African American heritage. He would say the words that we would think but were scared to say. Malcolm X lost his life by the Nation of Islam; everyone is surrounded by questions of this fearless man’s death. The files The Files of Malcolm X, reveals The Smoking Guns in the FBI reports, which was dated for February 22, 1965, the files declares that Malcolm X had 10 gun shots penetrating to the chest, his thigh and ankle, also there were 4 bullets pleats into his chest and thigh. When his autopsy was done, they found 1 gun being noticed as a millimeter slug, 1 - 45 caliber slugs, with numerous shotgun shots, that were all around and about in his body, torn through the heart of Malcolm X was born in Omaha, Nebraska. When Malcolm was in prison, he got religious, he wanted to change his criminal past, and became a member in the Nation of Islam. After Malcolm was released he started to preach on street corners. I have to say that Malcolm X was a very brave young man and stand up type of guy that did a lot to make blacks feel more connected to African American heritage. He stood up for African Americans and spoke out words and things that they were too......

Words: 1561 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

The Ballot or the Bullet

...The Ballot or the Bullet Analysis Jasmine Grant Jackson State University By Any Means Necessary! (Malcolm X) Malcolm X was born Malcolm Little in Omaha, Nebraska on May 19, 1925. His father, Earl Little, was an outspoken Baptist minister and avid supporter of Black Nationalist leader Marcus Garvey. Earl’s civil rights activism prompted death threats from the white supremacist organization Black Legion and the KKK, forcing the family to relocate twice before Malcolm’s fourth birthday. Regardless of the Little’s efforts to get away from the Legion, in 1929, their Michigan home was burned to the ground. Two years later, Earl’s body was found lying across the town’s trolley tracks. Police ruled both incidents as accidents. Malcolm’s mother, .Louise suffered emotional breakdown several years after the death of her husband and was committed to a mental institution, while her children were split up among various foster homes and orphanages. In Malcolm’s late teens he began to drift into the life of petty crime and was convicted on burglary charges. He was to serve 10 years of prison but was granted parole after seven. During his sentence he was converted to the Nation of Islam under the “Great” Elijah Muhammad. He became very active in the Nation and his great talents as a leader moved him to the number two spot in the Muslim organization. In 1964, he withdrew from the Nation upon the knowledge of Muhammad’s...

Words: 1562 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

The Reasons for the Success of the National Party's 1948 Election

...“The National Party Election victory was down to their policy of Apartheid.” – How far do you agree with this statement? Critically, this statement can be deemed as true to a great degree because the clear-cut, appealing Apartheid policy that Malan and the National Party stood for was the rallying point for the party to base all their arguments on. Equally, it is evident that other subsequent reasons such as the weaknesses of the United Party’s manifesto and previous existence in government – as well as the National Party’s effective ability to highlight this –were ultimately highly influential in giving rise to the victory of the National Party. As put by Dan O’Meara in his works from 1996, the election can be seen as “not won by the National Party, but lost by the government”. Following, are the reasons that stay true to the statement and also differing reasons which hold valuable placement on why the National Party victory occurred in 1948. Primarily, the National Party’s policy of Apartheid was so effective because it appealed to the electorate. The voting populace of South Africa came from a high majority of white Afrikaners - with the only “coloured” voters coming from the wealthy Black Cape Province - which made up 25% of the country’s population in total. Therefore, the policies of Apartheid which promised racial segregation and offered protection and comfort for the white workers who were beginning to feel their job security was in jeopardy after the war......

Words: 497 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Ddfsdf

...Peeling Away the Bark: Examining the Education of Little Tree by Forrest Carter "The Education of Little Tree," by Forrest Carter is about a young Cherokee boy named Little Tree who is orphaned and goes to live with his Cherokee grandparents. Since its publication debut in 1976 "The Education of Little Tree" has never been out of print. It hit the consumer shelves with ecstatic reviews in prestigious publication such as the New York Time and the Atlantic Monthly. The book sold more than a million copies and in 1985, a new publishing house, the University of New Mexico Press obtained publication rights and it continues to be their biggest seller, selling more than 1 _ million copies. At first read, the small 216-page book would seem suitable for young readers up through High School (Recommendation by publishers is grades 9 through 12). The book has its moments that make you smile and wonder. When it was first introduced into our school systems as required reading, schoolchildren around the country formed Little Tree fan clubs. Yet, shockingly enough, the book, "The Education of Little Tree" was publicly exposed as a fraud the year it was published. However, despite this evidence, in 1991, 15 years after its publication and 12 years after the author's death, "Little Tree" won the Abby Award and made it onto the New York Times' bestseller list. The Abby Award is given out each year by the American Booksellers Association to honor "hidden treasures." Ironically the Award began......

Words: 1181 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Civil Rights Diary: Assassination of Malcolm X

...Civil Rights Diary: Assassination of Malcolm X Karina Yanez HIS/145 June 18, 2013 Professor Lisa Antaki Civil Rights Diary: Assassination of Malcolm X Malcolm X also known as Malcolm Little. Malcolm X was killed on February 22, 1965 while he was at Audubon Ballroom fixing to give his speech. While he was fixing to give his speech there were two men that started to argue and was interrupting him. As he heard the two men arguing he said “Now, now brothers break it up. Be cool, be calm.” When everyone heard that situation three men started walking towards Malcolm and started shooting. Malcolm was shot several times and while they shot him he fell back over the chairs that he was standing in front of. Everyone just ducked down and covered their selves in some kind of way for protection while the shooters tried taking off running. As they tried running away, there were some of Malcolm’s guys that were beating the two men up as the police tried to rush in and capture them. As the police were trying to get the men, a lady discovered that Malcolm was still breathing, so they immediately took him to the hospital so they can save him. It didn’t work. Nobody really knew why the three men (Talmadge Hayer, Norman 3x Bulter, and Thomas 15x Johnson) killed Malcolm X. Still till this day they tried and figured it out but nothing. To me I feel like it had to be because he was once part of the Nation of Islam and wanted to get out because of what he was......

Words: 413 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The Change In The Autobiography Of Malcolm X

...In the Autobiography of Malcolm X, Malcolm purpose is for the readers to understand his change in life. Throughout the first 11 chapters, Malcolm uses flashbacks to effectively draw the readers to understand how his life went from bad to worse. The author Alex Harley writes about Malcolm X’s life to show the readers that a long time ago that the African American society was divided, and did not have the same rights as others. Alex Harley gave us an overview on how racism was in the past and how people dealt with it. When Malcolm was born he was faced severe racism with the Ku Klux Klan and when they burned his family's home. They were forced to leave and go somewhere else. These bad events taking place in malcolm's life made him not only stronger but also a better person. The problems he faced, helped him build on his confidence. The author uses style in the text by showing us that they were using hip words for example dancing and how he was describing the zoot suit. He also used figurative language when he said “ Walking on my own coffin” ( Malcolm X Pg 149 ) for instance when he was saying this he was threatening a police officer and he knew it was dangerous but he took a chance and still decided to say it. The author uses syntax by separating the sentences by commas such as “ It was about two days later, when i went to pick up the watch, that things fell apart” also when he says “ The loser of the watch, the person from whom it had been stolen from us, i later found,......

Words: 674 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

George Orwell's The Autobiography Of Malcolm X

...In The Autobiography of Malcolm X, he gives detail on his perspective of the world. Throughout his life he was exposed to many events that gave insight and knowledge, which ultimately would play a key role in molding Malcolm X into the man that he would soon become. In the entirety of Malcolm's life he was faced with the problem of racism and racist people. One of Malcolm's first encounters with racist people, as told to him by his mother, occurred before he was even born. On page 2 he says, “When my mother was pregnant with me, … a party of Ku Klux Klan riders galloped up to our home in boston.” So even before Malcolm was born, he and his family were threatened by racist klansmen. This quote also shows infers that Malcolm would have future problems with white supremacist. Now Malcolm's father, a preacher of the words of March Garvey and a member of the Universal Negro Improvement Association, was in turn heavily hated among the klansmen. White supremacist hated his teachings so much that the only thing they could think of to stop him, was to kill him. On page 2 Malcolm says, “And my father was finally to die by the white man’s hand.” Malcolm also says, “It has always been my belief that I, too, would die by violence.” This is a very interesting quote because it shows that based on who his father was and how he was raised, he knew that he was destined to send an inspiring message across the nation and therefore, would cause violence created by those who didn't......

Words: 453 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Analysis Of Malcolm X's A Homemade Education

...As a leader of civil rights movement of black people, Malcolm X, the African- American man who is well known by the world for his extraordinary life experiences, outstanding eloquence and charismatic leadership. In the A Homemade Education, Malcolm described how hard study at the beginning. The article is very logical. At first, ‘I’ become ‘frustrated’, because he cannot express what he want to say to Elijah. It prove that Elijah is very important person for Malcom. Then, Malcom told the reader how him study. Next, he start to talk about negro struggles for freedom by he had read. Thus causing his standpoint that is black people need freedom. “The teaching of Mr.Muhammad stressed how history had been ‘whitened’…the black man simply had been...

Words: 345 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Outline Of Malcolm X's Terrible Legacy

...Macintyre, Ben. "Malcolm X's Terrible Legacy." The Times, 13 Nov. 1992, pp. NOPGCIT-NOPGCIT, eLibrary, https://explore.proquest.com/document/317859358?searchid=20180222133200661%3a400767%3a1519306667400&accountid=70500. • Malcolm was suspected to be at least three people • One of the first names was Malcolm little. • A poor boy from Michigan whose mother was the result of a grandmother’s rape by a white man. • The man was assumed to have experienced racism red in neck, tooth, and craw and grew up bad. • This earned the nickname “Detroit Red” as a hustling street pimp and later ending up in jail. • The second name was Malcolm X. The main one people use still today. • Where he converted to the radical black Muslim group called The Nation of...

Words: 274 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Malcolm X Influence On Religion

...The definition of a revolutionary according to the Merriam-Webster dictionary is: Causing or relating to a great or complete change. And that is just what Malcolm X was. Malcolm X, born Malcolm Little on May 19, 1925. Married to Betty Shabazz, had 6 children (Attallah Shabazz, Qubilah Shabazz, Ilyasah Shabazz, Gamilah Lumumba Shabazz, Malikah Shabazz, and Malaak Shabazz) was heavily affiliated with Black nationalism, Pan-Africanism and the Nation of Islam. Malcolm was assassinated on February 21, 1965 by a man named Thomas Hagan. Malcolm X was a predominant leader in the Nation of Islam. The Nation of Islam was recognized as “black muslims”. Before Malcolm’s conversion to the Nation of Islam from Christianity he had a troubled childhood. Malcolm was the son of Baptist minister Earl Little and Louise Little. During his childhood his family was severely persecuted by the Ku Klux Klan. While Malcolm was very young the family moved to Lansing, Michigan, where his father's outspoken ways led to the burning of the family's home by white racists. When he was six his father was murdered for his thoughts and what he preached. Malcolm's mother became mentally ill and the children were placed in the care of others. Malcolm was sent to a home for boys. Dropping out of school at 15, he moved to Boston to live with a sister. Malcolm then became active in the areas of drugs, prostitution, and gambling in Boston and Harlem. In 1946 Malcolm Little was sentenced to ten years in prison for......

Words: 766 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Malcolm X Research Paper

...Malcolm X, born Malcolm Little and also known as el-Hajj Malik el-Shabazz was an American Muslim minister and human rights activist. He was born on May 19, 1925 in Omaha, Nebraska. His mother, Louise Norton Little, was a homemaker occupied with the family’s eight children. His father, Earl Little, was an outspoken Baptist minister. In 1955, Betty Sanders met Malcolm X after one of his lectures, then again at a dinner party; soon she was regularly attending his lectures. In 1956 she joined the Nation of Islam, changing her name to Betty X. One-on-one dates were contrary to the Nation's teachings, so the couple courted at social events with dozens or hundreds of others, and Malcolm X made a point of inviting her on the frequent group visits he led to New York City's museums and libraries. Malcolm X proposed during a telephone call from Detroit in January 1958, and they married two days later. They had six daughters. At the age of 15 Malcolm X dropped out of school after his English teacher told him that he couldn’t become a lawyer because he was black. He became acquainted with the underground, soon turning to selling drugs. His life came to a screeching halt in 1946, when he was arrested on charges of larceny and sentenced to ten years in prison. Now a free man, Malcolm X traveled to Detroit Michigan, where he worked with the leader of the Nation of Islam, Elijah Muhammad. Elijah Muhammad became Malcolm’s mentor. Malcolm X became the minister of many temples in the US. He......

Words: 429 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

1960 Diary Entries

...1960 Diary Entries HIS/135 Rachel Pearson 09/21/13 Cynthia Krutsinger Witness to the assassination of Malcolm X Malcolm X was a Muslim that became one of the greatest men that influential African Americans. Malcolm X was a victim of racism before he was even born. A White supremacist broke out his parents windows. When Malcolm was in junior high he was the only black student in the entire school. One afternoon, on February 21, 1965 Malcolm X was assassinated by the Nation of Islam minutes before he was about to address a rally in Harlem, New York. The questions surrounding about his death of this puzzling and fearless man still troubles us. The Files of Malcolm X, reveals The Smoking Guns in the FBI reports, which was dated for February 22, 1965, the files declares that Malcolm X had 10 gun shots penetrating to the chest, his thigh and ankle, also there were 4 bullets pleats into his chest and thigh. When his autopsy was done, they found 1 gun noticed as a millimeter slug, 1 - 45 caliber slugs, with numerous shotgun shots, that were all around and about in his body, torn through the heart of Malcolm X. I will say that Malcolm X was a very brave and stand up type of guy that did a lot to make blacks feel more connected to African American heritage. He stood up for African Americans and spoke out words and things that they were too afraid to say. He educated them on how to stand up for themselves and their rights as how to carry themselves as black men. He was......

Words: 388 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Paper

...Witness to the Assassination of Malcolm X Gregg V. Simmers HIS/145 December 4, 2012 Dr. LaShonda Catchings Witness to the Assassination of Malcolm X On a cold and cloudy day, as I watched my mother dress for work, not knowing if she would return home that evening. This was hard times for the Negro. The year was 1925; my future friend was just making his entrance in a world fill with pain and hatred. His name is Malcolm Little, he father was a preacher and it is said that he was killed by racist white supremacists. His mother was placed in a mental institution. He was cared for by state during this time of his life. Malcolm was a great student in middle school, he was very bright and had vision of becoming a lawyer. This dream was vanquish when his favorite teacher told him that he could not become a lawyer due to fact that he was a Negro. Malcolm became very angry and he left school and moved to Boston to live with his half sister. The year of 1946, Malcolm was sent to prison for breaking and entering with some friends he met in Boston. While serving his time in prison, Malcolm was introduced to the Nation of Islam. When he was release from prison, he followed the teaching of Elijah Muhammad once he was release in 1952. Malcolm no longer wanted to be called Malcolm Little, he went by the unknown name, so he changed his last name to X. Malcolm X was reborn again with another mind set, and religion. Under the teaching of Elijah Muhammad, Malcolm became one...

Words: 824 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Mississipi Burning

...I am going to present an essay about Mississippi Burning, which is a very good movie, and also gives us an insight as to the past of how afro-american people were treated by the Caucasian people. In my essay, I am going to explain the problems in the southern states and the following consequences that they result in. There will be a short description of the characters, especially the protagonists. Finally, I’m going to discus about the white supremacist organizations like the Ku Klux Klan and the following problems that still affect the postmodern society. The Ku Klux Klan still exist today, but it is not a huge problem that it was at the time. Mississippi Burning is a movie about an unsolved crime, done to a group of white activists and afro-americans. It is mostly about the afro-american people. Afro-americans are easier to identify, because of their skin color. The movie starts with a car chase, but it isn’t a regular one. In this car chase, the civilians are being chased by a police cruiser. The law enforcement officers are corrupt and they are interested in killing these ethnic kids, instead of following their normal procedure. The kids don’t have any choice but to obey the sirens from the cruiser, so they have to pull-over and see what the problem is. They are very quiet about it, because they haven’t done anything illegal, but when the police cruiser stops behind the kids’ vehicle, a group of 4 law enforcement officers, approach the suspect’s car. They draw their......

Words: 903 - Pages: 4