Free Essay

Evidence

In: Other Topics

Submitted By chotarichie
Words 3324
Pages 14
(1) INTRODUCTION

There are matters which do not require proof or are not allowed to be proved viz. (i) matters presumed, (ii) matters judicially noticed, and (iii) formal admissions.

(2) PRESUMPTIONS

(A) In general

Presumptions are inferences or positions established by law. They are conclusions which may or must be drawn until the contrary is proved. Several reasons have been proffered. Notable amongst these reasons are that the use of presumption accords with the preponderance of probabilities, saves time at the trial, solves a problem where ordinary rules result in an impasse as in the commorientes rule (discussed later), and operates to promote convenience. For example, absence unheard of which leads to a presumption of death enables the affairs of property to be wound up within a reasonable time. Presumptions are categorised as (i) particular presumptions, (ii) irrebuttable presumptions, and (iii) rebuttable presumptions.

(B) Particular Presumptions

(a) Presumption of regularity . This is expressed by the Latin maxim: Omnia praesumuntur rite esse acta [All acts are presumed to have been done rightly]. The presumption of regularity applies to acts of an official or judicial character. For example, in Berryman v Wise , it was held that an attorney need not prove by his certificate or by a roll of attorneys that he was an attorney. Proof that he acted as such was held sufficient. Again, in R v Roberts it was held that the presumption applied to a deputy judge of county court and in Dillon v R that it applied to a policeman.

(b) Presumption of innocence . The presumption of law as to innocence not only applies to criminal charges but also cases where an allegation of criminality is made.

(c) Presumption as to continuance . It is presumed that things or circumstances once proved to have existed at a certain time must continue to exist in that state for a reasonable time. This presumption is not sufficient to support a claim that a person was alive at a particular time as in R v Lumley where the accused, a woman, was tried for bigamy. It was proved that the woman married A in 1836, left him in 1843, and married another man in 1847. Nothing was heard of A after the accused left him, nor was any evidence given of his age, but the judge, holding that there was a presumption of law that A was alive at the date of the second marriage, withdrew the case from the jury and directed them to return a verdict of guilty. It was upheld by the Court of Crown Cases Reserved that there was no presumption of law either in favour, or against, the continuance of A's life up to 1847. The conviction was quashed.

(d) Presumption of death . There is a presumption of law as to death arising from seven years' unexplained absence. In Chard v Chard , it was alleged that the ceremony of marriage in 1933 between the petitioner and the respondent was a nullity. The petitioner had been married to another woman in 1909 and had last heard of her in 1917. The question was whether she should be presumed to be dead in 1933. The court inferred that he was alive then, and held the ceremony of 1933 null. Sachs J stated that for the presumption to take effect it must be shown –

(i) that there is no affirmative evidence that the person in question was alive at some time during a continuous period of seven years or more from persons who would be likely to have heard of him over that period;

(ii) that those persons who are likely to hear of him have not heard of him; and

(iii) that all due inquiries have been made appropriate to the circumstances.

There is no presumption as to the time of death. The burden of proving death at any particular time lies on the person who asserts it.

It must be noted, however, that section 184 (1) of the Law of Property Act 1925 – a statutory enactment of the commorientes rule – provides that where two or more persons die in circumstances rendering it uncertain which of them survived the other, the death shall be presumed to have occurred in order of seniority and the younger shall be deemed to have survived the elder. But where circumstances connected with the death of the persons involved can be proved the question of survivorship may be dealt with as a matter of fact.

(e) Presumption of law as to lawful origin . There is a presumption of law as to lawful origin: that asserted rights exercised uninterrupted for such a length of time that they may be fairly taken to have had a lawful origin, had such origin; for example, the presumption of lost grant. In Johnson v Barnes the corporation of a borough had from time immemorial exercised exclusively the right of pasturage. It was presumed that the corporation was entitled to exclusive rights. Again, in Bridle v Ruby it was held that since the plaintiff had established twenty-two years' user of a right of way by him and his predecessor in title, he was entitled to the presumption of last grant.

(f) Presumption of legitimacy . The fact that a child is born during the subsistence of a valid marriage of its mother or thereafter during the period of gestation raises the presumption of law that the child is legitimate.

(C) Irrebuttable and rebuttable presumptions

Presumptions are traditionally categorised as irrebuttable and rebuttable presumptions. An irrebuttable presumption is rule of law, for example, the presumption of doli incapax : that a child under ten cannot commit a crime. Two rebuttable presumptions are worthy of note. The presumption of legitimacy may be rebutted by strong evidence of non-access whilst equitable presumption of advancement may be rebutted by evidence of statements by the parent which forms part of the transaction, but not by evidence made subsequently or a course of conduct.

(3) JUDICIAL NOTICE

(A) Introduction

According to Stephen, “no evidence of any fact of which the Court will take judicial notice need be given by the plaintiff alleging its existence” because the matters noticed are of common notoriety. Two reasons have been proffered for the doctrine of judicial notice. The first is that it expedites the hearing of cases as where it is judicially noticed that a fortnight is too short a period for human gestation or that the advancement of learning is among the purposes for which the University of Oxford exists. The second is that it tends to produce uniformity of decisions on matters of fact. For example, in R v Simpson it was held that a flick knife was an offensive weapon per se for the purposes of section 1 (1) of the Prevention of Crime Act 1953 since it is an ‘article made … for use for causing injury to a person' within section 1 (4) of the Act.

Although Cross opines that it is pointless to make a list of cases in which courts have taken judicial notice of facts without inquiry since the justification for the courts acting in such a way is that the fact is too notorious, an attempt will be made to categorise the instances. The categories put forward here are: legal matters, constitutional matters, professional practice, historical facts and other facts.

(B) Legal matters

Judicial notice is taken of the laws of England but generally of other parts of the UK , the Commonwealth and the laws of foreign countries.

(a) Custom . Law Merchant such as customary right of a banker to a general lieu on his customer's securities in respect of money owed, general or local customs after due proof in earlier cases as certification by appropriate authority are judicially noticed.

(b) Decisions . Judicial precedent or reported cases constitute one of the sources upon which judges rely when taking judicial notice.

(c) Facts found by judges in the light of their experience. A trier of fact must not produce from his personal knowledge evidence with which the parties have not had an opportunity of dealing. He may use his knowledge to assess the evidence adduced before him but he is forbidden to use such knowledge in order to contradict the evidence given in court. Where a court or tribunal relies on the personal knowledge of one of their members, it is necessary to indicate not only that the member is a specialist in the field but also to bring the facts known by that member to the knowledge of the parties so that their counsel could either deal with them or ask for an adjournment.

In R v Blick the accused explained his presence at the scene of robbery by saying that he was visiting a public lavatory. A juror informed the judge that the lavatory was closed at the time, whereupon the judge invited the prosecution to call evidence on the point so that the juror's information might be investigated by both parties in open court. It was held that the judge had properly received a note and had acted properly in calling evidence on the point. Again, in Wetherall v Harrison where the issue was whether the accused had a good medical reason for refusing to give a blood sample. A medical witness for the prosecution testified that he had not. The justices found that, in the light of their own experience in the matter, the defendant may well have had a good reason for refusing. Lord Widgery CJ explained that whilst a magistrate is forbidden to use his knowledge in order to contradict evidence given in court, he may use his knowledge to assess the evidence adduced before him. The last-mentioned case must be contrasted with R v Fricker where it was held that where a juror had specialised knowledge of matters forming the background to the case against the defendant, and had communicated that information to other members of the jury who had then come to a verdict, the judge was obliged to discharge the jury because the defendant would have had no opportunity to challenge what amounted to an entirely new evidence or fact or put forward his own explanation.

Two other cases are worthy of note. In Reynolds v Llanelly Associated Tinplate Co. Ltd. a factory worker was injured in the right eye by a flying steel splinter and was incapacitated. An operation was performed on the injured eye and an award of compensation was made on the basis of total incapacity for four months. It was held that although the arbitrator was entitled to use his knowledge, properly applied and within reasonable time limits of matters which were within the common knowledge of persons in the district, the present case was a special and individual case and the arbitrator must, wrongly, have based his decision on some particular knowledge which he had. Again, in Harrington v Berker Sportcraft Ltd an employee was seeking compensation for unfair dismissal. In reliance on the personal knowledge and experience of a member of the industrial tribunal in trades connected with the employee's former employment, the tribunal decided to make an award in respect of future loss of earnings. On appeal, it was held that where a tribunal relied on the personal knowledge and experience of one of its members it was necessary to indicate not only that the member was a specialist but also to bring the facts known to that member to the attention of the employee's counsel so that if they were relied on the counsel could either deal with them or ask for an adjournment. As the matters had not been dealt with in this way the case was remitted for rehearing.

(d) Statutes . The effect of section 3 of the Interpretation Act 1978 is that every Act passed after 1850 shall be a public Act and judicially noticed as such in the absence of express provision to the contrary. Scots, foreign and colonial laws are not judicially noticed. It may be necessary to produce the Queen's Printers' copy of a Private Act passed before 1850.

(C) Constitutional matters

The following matters of public administration are judicially noticed:

(a) Sovereign and officers of the state . Judges take judicial notice of the accession and death of the Sovereign whom they represent. They also take judicial notice of the sovereignty of foreign rulers and even membership of the staff of their ambassador on information supplied by a Secretary of State. In Duff Development Co. v Government of Kelantan the Government of Kelantan applied for the enforcement of an arbitration award on the ground that Kelantan was an independent Sovereign State . The Secretary of State for the Colonies in a reply to an inquiry from the Master wrote that Kelantan was a Sovereign State and the Sultan the ruler thereof. The House of Lords held that this concluded the matter.

It must be noted, however, that a judge can take judicial notice of sovereign immunity but that a claim to immunity by a head of state or former head of state applies only to acts performed by him in the exercise of his functions as head of state and these do not extend to torture or other degrading or inhuman treatment.

(b) Parliament . The law and custom of Parliament are part of the law of England . Hence, parliamentary privilege as a defence to an action for libel has been judicially noticed though this is now governed by the Parliamentary Papers Act 1849 as amended.

(c) War . The courts take judicial notice of a state of war to which Britain is a party. Its continuance and cessation of hostilities can be certified by a Secretary of State.

(D) Professional practice

Judicial notice will be taken of the practice of conveyancers or the practice of ordinance survey as to what a line on the map indicates.

(E) Historical facts

The judge can rely on his own historical learning but where it is important to ascertain ancient facts of a public nature he is not permitted to refer to historical works. In Read v Bishop of Lincoln it was held that a judge might consider historical and ritualistic works on whether the mixture of communion wine with water was contrary to the law of the church but in Evans v Getting the history of Beconshire was declared inadmissible on the question of the boundary of Welsh parishes because of possible prejudice of the author.

(F) Other facts

The courts will take judicial notice of official Gazettes of London , Edinburgh and Belfast on their mere production and the fact that a postcard is likely to be read by people other than the addressee.

(4) FORMAL ADMISSIONS

An alleged fact can be formally or informally admitted. Informal admissions are “made casually … they must be proved; and far from being conclusive, they may be denied or explained away …” Any matters which have been formally admitted need not be proved.

In criminal proceedings, the general rule is that formal admissions are inadmissible. There are, however, two exceptions. The first is section 10 of the Criminal Justice Act 1967 which provides that a formal admission may be made by or on behalf of the prosecution or defendant before, or at any criminal proceedings, and may, with the leave of court, be withdrawn. The effect of this statutory provision is that the admitted fact ceases to be a fact in issue. The other exception is the plea of guilty rendered admissible by section 74 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 which is discussed in Chapter 5.

In civil proceedings, formal admissions may be voluntary or in response to a notice by the other party. The rules relating to formal admissions have been changed by the introduction of the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR). Formal admissions are made in pleadings and all pleadings now have evidential status; for example, failure of a defendant to deal with an allegation in a claimant's form or statement of the case will amount to an admission of the allegation.

A formal admission may also be made in an answer to notice to admit. The old rule that an admission made orally by counsel at the trial for the purpose of dispensing with proof precludes any evidence on this point is now subsumed in the wider principle of CPR, Pt 14, r.1. It must be noted, however, that where there are two interrelated matters, the admission of one does not exclude the other. Any party may admit the truth of the whole or any part of another party's case at any stage of the proceedings (CPR, r.14.1 (1)) by giving such notice in a statement of a case or by letter (CPR, r.14.1 (2)). Finally, a party must make disclosure of documents which are in his possession. Disclosure is the process of revealing the existence of the documents (CPR, r.31.2).

See W.M. Best, The Principles of the Law of Evidence , ed. by S.L. Phipson (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1922), at 271.

See J.D. Heydon and M. Ockleton, Evidence: Cases & Materials (London and Sydney: Butterworths, 1996), at 60-62.

(1791) 4 TR 366; 100 ER 1067.

(1878) 14 Cox CC 101.

[1982] 1 All ER 1017.

Williams v East India Co (1802) 3 East 192; 102 ER 571.

(1869) LR 1 CCR 196.

[1956] P.259, [1955] 3 WLR 954, [1955] 3 All ER 721, 99 SJ 890.

[1956] P.259 at 272, [1955] 3 All ER 721 at 728 F-G. The seven year wait for certifying death (without a body) was suspended in respect of British people feared dead in the Indian Ocean tsunami disaster in December 2004. Death certificates were issued in a matter of months.

Re Phene's Trust (1870) LR 5 Ch. 139.

McMahon v McElroy (1869) 5 Ir. Rep. Eq. 1; Hopewell v De Pinna (1809) 2 Camp 113; Nepean v Doe (1837) 2 M&W 894; and R v Lumley, supra, n.7.

“Commorientes” are persons who die in a common calamity such as shipwreck, earthquake, conflagration and battle; for example, the tsunami disaster in the Indian Ocean in December 2004. See W.M. Best, Principles of the Law of Evidence (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1922), at 351.

See J.P. Taylor, A Treatise on the Law of Evidence (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1931), Vol. 1, at 183.

(1873) LR 8 CP 527.

[1988] 3 All ER 64.

Banbury Peerage Case (1811) 1 Sim & St 153.

Re Jenion [1952] Ch. 454, CA.

Shephard v Cartwright [1955] AC 431.

J.F. Stephen, A Digest of the Law of Evidence , ed. by H.L. Stephen and L.F. Sturge (London: Macmillan, 1948), Art. 62.

R v Luffe (1807) 8 East 193.

Re Oxford Poor Rate Case (1857) 8 E&B 184.

[1983] 3 All ER 789.

Sir Rupert Cross, Cross on Evidence (London: Butterworths, 1967), at 130.

(1966) 50 Cr App R 280.

[1976] 1 All ER 241.

(1999) The Times, 13 July.

[1948] 1 All ER 40.

[1980] 1 ICR 248.

Mostyn v Fabrigas (1774) 1 Cowper 161.

[1924] AC 797.

R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrates & Others, ex p Pinochet Ugarte (No. 3) [1999] 2 WLR 827, at HL. See also Harb v King Fahd Bin Abdul Aziz (2005) The Times, 6 June, CA and Republic of Yemen v Aziz (2005) The Times, 22 June, CA.

Stockdale v Hansard (1839) 9A. & E.1 and Bradlaugh v Gosset (1994) 12 QBD 271.

R v Bothrill [1947] KB 41.

Re Rosher (1994) 26 Ch D 801.

[1892] AC 644.

(1834) 6C & P586.

Documentary Evidence Act 1868, ss. 2 and 5.

Huth v Huth [1915] KB 32.

G.D. Nokes, An Introduction to Evidence (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1967), at 287.

CPR, Pt. 16 r.5 (Subject to qualifications in CPR, Pt. 16, rr.3 and 4).

CPR, r.32.18

See Ellis v Allen [1914] 1 Ch. 904.

Barnes v Merritt (1898) 15 TLR 419.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Evidence

...QUESTION- 1) Bincangkan bagaimanakah pengecaman (identification) seseorang suspek boleh dibuat menurut Seksyen 9 (Akta Keterangan 1950). 2) Nyatakan juga permasalahan dan cabaran-cabaran (jika ada) yang terdapat dalam teknik pengecaman tersebut dengan merujuk kepada autoriti yang relevan. Identification of Person a)Identification by fingerprint Fingerprint Identification is the method of identification using the impressions made by the minute ridge formations or patterns found on the fingertips. No two persons have exactly the same arrangement of ridge patterns, and the patterns of any one individual remain unchanged throughout life. Fingerprints offer an infallible means of personal identification. Other personal characteristics may change, but fingerprints do not. By comparing fingerprints at the scene of a crime with the fingerprint record of suspected persons, officials can establish absolute proof of the presence or identity of a person. Fingerprint is a biometric modality that is often used in a security setting. Fingerprint databases are in use worldwide for the purposes of personal identification, border control as well as to facilitate criminal forensic investigation. Many countries have multiple fingerprint databases, with each database serving a specific purpose. In Malaysia, there are at least 4 different fingerprint databases; namely PDRM-MAFIS (Polis Di Raja Malaysia- Malaysian Automated Fingerprint Identification System), PDRM-BIOFIS (Polis...

Words: 9471 - Pages: 38

Premium Essay

Evidence Tracking

...Evidence Tracking Properly handling evidence is critical to crime solving, improper deviations to the handling can make it impossible to prosecute using the evidence collected. This paper will outline will track the evidence from a chosen crime scene through all the proper handling processes. This paper will describe the chosen crime scene scenario, describe the collected evidence and proper collection, recording of the evidence, chain of evidence, processing, interpretation methods, preservation of the evidence, proper presentation methods for different types of evidence, and the consequences of mishandling the evidence collected. The Crime and Processing Protocols The chosen crime scene scenario is a sexual assault; the first responding officer will have been notified of a possible rape and traveled to an apartment complex at 306 Timber Road, Apartment 12-B to investigate. Upon arrival, the first crime scene procedure is to make sure the crime scene is safe and the possible offender has been arrested or is no longer on the scene. If the struggle were still occurring, this would be the point to render aid. The next procedure would be to determine the extent of the crime and to secure the scene from intrusion to preserve any evidence. It is important for the responding officer to keep their superiors informed of their activities. At this point the responding officer will touch nothing and document all of their observations and actions, if the scene had been disturbed in any...

Words: 1515 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Evidence Outline

...EVIDENCE OUTLINE Prof. Mark Bonner Fall 2012 |1 • INTRODUCTION | I. Trial Context A. types of evidence at trial 1. witnesses 2. real evidence – something tangible related to the case 3. demonstrative evidence – not part of the story, but lawyer wishes to show the jury something to demonstrate something about the case (e.g., experiment; picture of intersection) B. competing stories at trial – two ways stories can compete 1. factual differences 2. differences in inferences drawn from the same facts II. Policy Overview [values that the evidence rules protect] A. accuracy 1. rationality – does evidence have a rational relationship to the case? 2. reliability – is the evidence credible? B. efficiency – see FRE 403 C. fairness – rules should be party-neutral 1. but note: some rules exclude evidence to one party’s advantage (e.g., evidence that Δ fixed the steps after the accident excluded, b/c we want to encourage Δs to make steps safer) (e.g., Confrontation Clause, guarantees rt of accused in a criminal trial to confront witnesses brought against him) D. danger of misuse of information 1. one solution: limiting instructions 2. but sometimes we’re so skeptical of jury’s willingness/ability...

Words: 30878 - Pages: 124

Free Essay

Evidence

...HPNA Position Statement Evidence-Based Practice Background Increased attention is being directed toward the development of methods that can provide valid and reliable information about what works best in healthcare. The careful scientific evaluation of clinical practice became a prominent focus during the second half of the 20th century.1 More recently, attention has been paid to methods of determining which of multiple proven approaches to a healthcare problem works best for which patients.2 Evidence-based practice encompasses implementing the best-known practices into the clinical setting using a scientific approach. It evolved from evidence-based medicine, which was developed in Canada to teach medical students. “Evidence-based medicine has been defined as the conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients.”3, p. 3 The National Quality Forum’s report A National Framework and Preferred Practices for Palliative and Hospice Care Quality is a consensus report that is a first step toward introducing evidence-based measures into palliative practice on a formal, national level.4 The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) supports organizations in their efforts to improve the quality and efficiency of healthcare by facilitating the use of evidence-based research findings in clinical practice.5 The nursing discipline has also embraced evidence-based practice over the past 25 years, initially through...

Words: 1545 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Forensic Evidence

...application of science to the law. In recent years the use of forensic science has become increasingly necessary to help with criminal and civil investigations. Although forensic evidence is admissible in court one must keep in mind how that evidence made its way to the court system. I will take you through the process. For there to be admissible evidence for a court case there must be physical evidence which would have been collected at a crime scene therefore there must have been some kind of crime committed. A crime with physical evidence doesn’t necessarily mean something violent but it can be. Theft, arson, car accident and murder are just a few examples of what a crime can be. The process begins when the crime has been committed, to the officers arriving on the scene, to surveying the scene, collecting the evidence, submitting it to the lab, submitting it as evidence and finally the acceptance of the evidence. When a call is sent out regarding a possible crime and the first officer arrives on scene it is that officer’s obligation to do a few things as precise as possible: 1. seek medical attention for those who may need it, 2. arrest or detain any perpetrators, and 3. secure the crime scene. Securing the crime scene is extremely important because you want to be able to retrieve as much evidence as possible. By securing the crime scene you are blocking off the area from unauthorized personnel. You want to keep the foot traffic to a minimum to prevent tampering and...

Words: 1263 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Evidence In Oedipus The King

...Imagine: you’re a part of the jury in a court-case involving the accusation of a man murdering his own father. What is the first thing one would look at to prove the case guilty or not guilty? Starting at the very basics, evidence is by far the most important attribute of a case. Evidence of motives, intentions, actions, confessions and other vocalizations hold the most effective and win-worthy arguments. These components are like a concoction, with the right amount of each, it creates the perfect argument for a case. They all provide different characteristics and can be interpreted diversely. For this reason, when studying the murder in the story of Oedipus Rex by Sophocles, all of those qualities were taken into consideration. In the play,...

Words: 803 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Laws of Evidence

...Laws of Evidence Assignment 5 Using just the Federal Rules of Evidence and your knowledge of the hearsay rule and its exceptions, please discuss briefly whether each of the following nine out of court “statements” may be allowed into evidence or whether they are barred by the hearsay rule: 1) The five (5) statements that appear in “Practice Application 12.1" in your textbook, which appears at the end of Chapter 12 (page 323) of your textbook 2) The four (4) statements that appear in “Practice Application 13.1" in your textbook, which appears at the end of Chapter 13 (page 362-363) of your textbook You do not need to cite outside cases for this assignment. I am just looking for a short explanation for each one as to whether it is admissible under the hearsay rule. You may and should ignore all other evidentiary issues other than the hearsay rule! Practice Application 12.1 The Defendant is charged with falsely spreading a bomb scare at his school. At trail, 1. Prosecution offers witness, Marge, who testifies that she was standing in the school hallway when she heard a student walking by say that a bomb had been planted and it would go off at noon. This testimony by Marge would be admissible under the Fed. R. Evid rule 803(3). Which says that “[a] statement of the declarant’s then-existing state of mind (such as motive, intent, or plan) or emotional, sensory, or physical condition (such as mental feeling, pain, or bodily health), but not including a statement...

Words: 1379 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Physical Evidence

...PHYSICAL EVIDENCE Name Institution Physical Evidence In the field of crime and justice, the success of an investigation depends on the assemblage and analysis of the different types of evidence (Swanson Et Al., 2012). Forensic experts usually classify evidence ass either physical or biological evidence. Biological evidence refers to any type of evidence that they draw from a living being while Physical evidence refers to any type of evidence that they draw from a non-living organism. Examples of physical evidence are fibers, fingerprints, footprints, building materials and paints among others. On the other hand, DNA and bloodstains are some of the examples of biological evidence (Swanson Et Al., 2012). To me, the most interesting type of physical evidence is fingerprints. Fingerprints are one of the few things that one is sure not denying that it belongs to him or her. By default, everybody has his or her own unique fingerprint (Swanson Et Al., 2012). Therefore, in the case of crime, collection and analysis of evidence becomes easier for the forensic experts in case they get the fingerprints of the suspect. Unlike the other types of Physical Evidence where the suspect can easily deny to having any association with, fingerprints are unique to him or her thus no chance of denying. In fact, if the forensic experts can be able to get the fingerprints at the scene of a crime as evidence then compare it with the fingerprints of the suspect, then the case is as good as done...

Words: 303 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Chain of Evidence

...Name Instructor Course Date The Chain of Evidence The chain of evidence refers the paper trail showing the seizure, custody, control, transfer, analysis and disposition of physical or electronic evidence. Any evidence obtained in the course of an investigation is subject to interrogation in a court of law. Subject to this demand, it is important that evidence is kept free from contamination, and achieved through as routine called the chain of custody. A motion of suppression is made by the defendant and is done whenever there is a break in the chain of evidence to exclude the admission of said evidence at the trial. The chain of custody, therefore, ensures the integrity of all material proof of a crime through handling it in a secure and validated manner so that it arrives at court untainted. William is a banker at a downtown bank accused of murder in the first degree. William took part in a protracted argument with Miles, a mechanic, at a local restaurant that ended with Miles assaulting him. William is suspected to have driven over to Miles house later that evening, cornering him in the kitchen, and shot him twice in the chest with a revolver.The much larger Miles was able to wrest the gun out of William’s hands. A short struggle ensued, which resulted in William stabbing Miles in the neck with a kitchen knife. Alarmed neighbors called the police at the sound of the shots being fired, and the first patrol car arrived on the scene three minutes later and found Miles dead...

Words: 698 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Physical Evidence Credibility

...Evidence can make or break a case in court, physical evidence is the most reliable form of evidence and can make it much easier to find the truth. Although in some cases there are limited forms of physical evidence and witnesses need to be call to the stand in order to set a story straight. Credibility of a witness comes in to play in every court case being decided by a judge or adjudicator in which a witness is called to the stand to testify. That could be an eye witness to a crime or an expert witness giving a statement and even the accused testifying on their own behalf. Credibility is legally defined as, “Worthiness of belief; that quality in a witness which renders his evidence worthy of belief. After the competence of a witness is allowed, the consideration of his credibility arises, and not before.” There are many things that are taken into account when the court including, demeanour in court, consistency of story and if the witness is an expert, qualifications. This paper will examine how the court decides if a witness is credible or not and the...

Words: 1818 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Bite Marks as Evidence

...An innocent prisoner named Ray Koone walked out of prison in Yuma, Arizona on April 8, 2004 after serving 10 years for the murder of a cocktail waitress. The evidence that convicted him was a set of bite mark that matched his teeth with the bite marks on one of her breasts. Throughout this entire time, he always maintained his innocence. It turned out 10 years after his conviction he was exonerated due to DNA evidence on the victim’s clothes turned out to match that of another man. When it comes to bite marks unless the victim is found immediately after the bite happens and victims are not found immediately after they have been bitten, bruising and abrasions will start to appear and continue to change the skin the longer it takes before the victim is found. If very many hours go by it is even hard to tell if the marks are even bite marks. One time bruises thought to be bite marks were actually bruises made by a hair band. Bite marks are subjective and unless the victim is immediately found right after they were bitten it is impossible to even come close to identification of the suspect. The only positive way to match up the victim with the suspect is if DNA evidence can be gathered along with the imprint of the bite that matches both suspect and victim (Randerson, 2004). Also bite marks can be made while a body can be in many different body positions and skin has elasticity to it and stretches which can cause distortion of the bite marks. The identification of mistaken...

Words: 395 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Parole Evidence

...How justified is the fact that Parole Evidence Rule has outlived its importance in the modern day life? The parol evidence rule has long been a controversial element of the common law system. It has been frequently attacked for the injustices that result from its application and sometimes even for a lack of rationality in its justification. This exposition results from the conviction that useful light can be shed on the problems surrounding the parol evidence rule by an examination of its status in other common law jurisdictions, where it has also been the subject of constant dispute throughout the previous half century. The written document produced by the parties is merely a memorandum of the agreement that they have reached. Consequently, when a court attempts to resolve a dispute regarding the agreement, the written document is construed as persuasive evidence of what was agreed, and can be contradicted by other evidence tending to show that the actual agreement was something different. By contrast, the objective theory of contracting holds that the written document is in fact the agreement itself, so that in attempting to discern the nature of the bargain between the parties it is improper to admit evidence that contradicts the written document. Since the actual intentions of the parties are not being considered by the court, evidence that would tend to demonstrate that their intentions were something other than the written document reflects is simply irrelevant. ...

Words: 1873 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Presumption Under Law of Evidence

...taken for It is, however, rarely employed in jurisprudence in this extended sense. Like “presumption it has there obtained a restricted legal signification, and is used to of an inference, affirmative or dis-affirmative, of the existence of some fact, drawn by a judicial tribunal, by a process of probable reasoning, from some matter of fact, either judicially noticed or admitted or established by legal evidence to the satisfaction of the tribunal. Presumptions are drawn from the course of nature for instance, that night will follow day, the seasons follow each other, death ensues from a mortal wound, and the like; or from the course of human affairs from a familiarly with the ordinary springs of human action, from the usages of society, domestic relationship and transactions in business [Norton, p 97; see post, s 114].J Shortly speaking, a presume is an inference of fact drawn from other known or proved facts. It is a rule of under which courts are authorized to draw a particular inference from a particular fact unless and until the truth of such inference is disproved by other evidence. Divisions of Presumption: Presumption according to English test-written are: (a) Presumptions of fact or natural presumption: (b) Presumptions of law (rebuttable and irrebuttable); and (c) Mixed presumptions. Conclusive presumption : Presumption of fact or natural presumptions are inferences which are natural drawn from the experience and observation of the course of nature...

Words: 6963 - Pages: 28

Free Essay

Tendency and Coincidence Evidence

...TENDENCY AND COINCIDENCE EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL CASES (Parts of this paper are a repetition of a paper I prepared for the Legal Aid conference last year and which was published in Bar News Criminal Law Special Edition.) Ian Barker QC 1. I have practised law from a time beyond which the memory of man runneth not. At least, that is how it feels. During those years I managed, I think, to develop a slippery hold on fundamentals of the law of evidence, from the myriad cases on the subject. I was recently heartened to read something written by Sir James Stephen in about 1886 in the Introduction to his Digest of the Law of Evidence1. Speaking of the difficulty in finding concise guidance to the law of evidence he said: No such work, so far as I know, exists; for all the existing books on the Law of Evidence are written on the usual model of English law-books, which, as a general rule, aim at being collections more or less complete of all the authorities upon a given subject to which a judge would listen in an argument in court. Such works often become, under the hands of successive editors, the repositories of an extraordinary amount of research, but they seem to me to have the effect of making the attainment by direct study of a real knowledge of the law, or of any branch of it as a whole, almost impossible. The enormous mass of detail and illustration which they contain, and the habit into which their writers naturally fall, of introducing into them everything which has any...

Words: 10456 - Pages: 42

Premium Essay

Evidence-Park & Waltz

...written material or any other medium includes electronically stored information. RULE 102. PURPOSE These rules should be construed so as to administer every proceeding fairly, eliminate unjustifiable expense and delay, and promote the development of evidence law, to the end of ascertaining the truth and securing a just determination. RULE 103. RULINGS ON EVIDENCE (a) Preserving a Claim of Error. A party may claim error in a ruling to admit or exclude evidence only if the error affects a substantial right of the party and: (1) if the ruling admits evidence, a party, on the record: (A) timely objects or moves to strike; and (B) states the specific ground, unless it was apparent from the context; or (2) if the ruling excludes evidence, a party informs the court of its substance by an offer of proof, unless the substance was apparent from the context. (b) Not Needing to Renew an Objection or Offer of Proof. Once the court rules definitively on the record — either before or at trial — a party need not renew an objection or offer of proof to preserve a claim of error for appeal. (c) Court’s Statement About the Ruling; Directing an Offer of Proof. The court may make any statement about the character or form of the evidence, the objection made, and the...

Words: 49736 - Pages: 199