Free Essay

Evolution and Theology

In: Religion Topics

Submitted By bigdaddy54
Words 872
Pages 4
1. In his book, The Groaning of Creation, Christopher Southgate offers his interpretation of The Fall and redemption in the light of evolution. He calls his interpretation the “only way” argument. The argument can be summarized as: “The sort of universe that we have, in which complexity emerges in a process governed by thermodynamic necessity and Darwinian natural selection, and therefore by death, pain, and self-assertion, is the only sort of universe that could give rise to the range, beauty, complexity, and diversity of creatures the Earth has produced.” (pg. 29) Southgate states that his argument is an un-provable assumption, but is an excellent framework for understanding creation. He contends that non-human suffering confirms the evolution of species and Darwinism. Southgate disputes that suffering, death, and extinction are byproducts of Gods evolutionary process, something that is part of God’s overall plan for creation. In his argument, Southgate does not claim that God is evil for creating suffering, but instead argues that it is a fundamental part to create balance and aid the development of life (pg. 48). Southgate’s “only way” argument differs from Christianity’s traditional view of atonement theory. Traditionalists would argue that a just God would never allow or manufacture suffering or pain. Southgate disputes traditionalists by offering that the diversity and allure of life could never materialize without suffering. Under his theory, suffering and pain are not necessarily bad for creation but good. Suffering results in the growth of species and guides them towards fulfillment. Although Southgate supports the existence of suffering he does not reject the presence of sin or The Fall. Under his theory, The Fall was not purely a human offense, but part of creation. Since The Fall, all of creation has been striving to become the fittest, and most pure image of God. It is also important to separate suffering from sin when understanding the “only way” argument. Sin can be defined as a conscious action that negatively affects the fulfillment of other creatures. Sin impedes creations transcendence. Under the “only way” argument, sin intervenes with our development and causes conflict. Southgate states that there is a heaven and animals may go there. He argues that a good and loving God would not allow any of his creature’s lives to end without fulfillment. He references the bibles idea of a redeemed creation, not just for humans but all of creation (pg. 50). Southgate refers to heaven as a place where frustrated creatures may be satisfied and live a “good life.” I agree with Southgate’s conclusions. I believe that frustrated creatures must be given a second chance to live a pure life. God’s love for animals is shown repeatedly throughout the bible, resulting in a fair argument. Interestingly, I don’t think fulfillment should be limited to just humans, it would be ignorant for to think so. Why should we be given preference to live a “good life”, when animals are made in the same image and likeness of God.
2. “More science and more technology are not going to get us out of the present ecological crisis until we find a new religion or rethink our old one” (White 1206). White’s quote alludes to humanities anthropocentrism, the belief that humans are the central and most significant creatures on earth. This belief has given humans the idea that they are superior to all other creatures. White argues that people put themselves at the center of creation and give little thought to other creatures. Her point is true when considering the bible. In Genesis 1:28 God gave humans dominion over all creation. This passage has resulted in people misusing their authority and hurting creation in the process. White is correct by saying that people need to rethink their religions. Like all other passages in the bible, Genesis 1:28 can be interpreted literally or metaphorically. Religious authorities must always be aware of the potential issues when interpreting scripture literally. Instead of seeing creation as our own, we must act like stewards caring for it and participating without limiting the fulfillment of other species.
I agree with James Schaefer’s claim that: “We are damaging the Earth by forcing changes in the Global climate that cannot be ignored” (Miller 79). The quote is a great example of how the absence of stewardship has evolved into a major issue with religion. Because of humanities condition to place their interests over creations, we are now faced with a major climate change issue. Schaefer categorizes mankind’s wrongdoings as “planetary sins”, since they effect the planet in its entirety. Schaefer’s idea shows how sin is a major issue among humans, but it is difficult for us to measure what a planetary sin is. Is buying packaged or factory farmed food a sin? For those with less money these products will keep them alive, but being poor could predispose people to sin. Under Schaefer’s framework he argues that sin actually offends God, the creator of the world (Miller 80). Sin is very much a religious issue. It is religions role to understand the needs of creation and build alliances between humans and nature. By understanding patterns of sin and its prevalence, religion can create ways to balance humanities relationship with nature.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

The Advancement

...2013) Introduction to Apologetics Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary Edwin S. Krzyzek (ID# 25767621) June 16th, 2013 Introduction The scales of theology have shifted. The balance of human epistemology has shifted from a higher creator to cosmic accident. The vast majority of history has shown humans to be theistic; the most recent dot on the string of time has been that of naturalism. Where Christianity has dominated western thinking for so long, it now finds itself in the minority voice of reason. Even Christians themselves have taken to blending their views to remain contemporary. L Russ Bush addresses this proliferation of naturalism in The Advancement. Brief Summary Bush produces an eight chapter discourse on the evolution, propagation and fallacy of a view that espouses inevitable naturalistic progress. One that believes biological life and humans in particular are evolving into a constant state of improvement. That believes science to be the replacement of God. Bush coins this worldview, “the Advancement”. Bush says that Christian stability has been replaced by naturalisms unstable relativity. Meaning no longer has meaning. Truth itself is subjective and new is always better. Bush begins by introducing a number of pre-modern and modern philosophers. Bush succinctly steps us through the evolution of this modern thinking and contrasts that against the Christian worldview. He outlines the ascension of scientific method and Darwinian dominance, noting the...

Words: 1326 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Newtton

...Darwinism is a theory regarding the evolution of the species. Darwinism does not speak specifically to the beginning of the universe. God's existence either as the starter or the responsible entity for secondary causation does not negate Darwinism. It may just be a methodology for explaining secondary causation that according to current understading is rather haphazard or random. Gregory Mendel was an Augustian Monk and considered the founder of mondern genetic theory, his life alone should be proof that God and Darwin can coexist. Mendel was interested in heredity and did major work in the development of the study of the genetics of plants before the science was even beginning to be developed. Historically issues of faith and science have collided and I would think that both theology and science have its place in the world as the search for knowledge continues. Religious Fundamentalism which requires a literal interpretation of the Bible as a substitute for science is bad theology and bad for science, and mistakenly puts the science and theology at war assuming that there is only one truth and it exists in one place and is not subject to any further interpretation. Simil arly mean spirited materialistic science which negates or belittles theology is similarly wrong headed and denies much of the basis from which it came. Historically I believe that both science and theology have their place in explaining man's and or women's place in the universe and their relation to...

Words: 398 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Book Critique

...Liberty University Why not Advancement: a critique of The Advancement by L. Ross Bush A paper submitted to Dr. Bruce Forrest in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Christian Apologetics APOL 500 Bobby Barnett 11/24/2013 Contents Section Page Introduction……………………………………………………………………………3 Summary……………………………………………………………………………….3 Critique…………………………………………………………………………………6 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………...10 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………….11 Introduction The society of today has come a long way in many disciplines such as technology. While the human race basks in the advancements of these many disciplines, a real danger that once was an unthinkable travesty has become an unfortunate reality. The reality is that as society enjoys the advances in science and knowledge, these advances are not progress at all but a hollow attempt of a society that has willingly begun to extinguish the light of faith in order to live in darkness spiritually. This is the domain of The Advancement by L. Russ Bush. Bush coins the term “advancement” and defines this term as the age into which society has now begun to descend on the vehicle of postmodern thought. The danger that Bush presents as inherent in the change to advancement thinking is that regression both physically and spiritually is interpreted as progression within the previous modern and postmodern paradigm. Summary The Advancement by L. Russ Bush is a presentation. Bush presents the...

Words: 2478 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

The New Atlantis

...this world than just people. I believe that his scientific method and his gatherings are what has lead him to believe such a theory. Moving forward, Bacon tends to divide theology into two categories: natural and revealed. Natural theology is knowing that God exist, we know this because of study of nature and the creatures God created. I am a follower of natural theology, I enjoy studying creations because it makes my faith for God a lot stronger. Anything other than the knowledge of God and his creations is labeled under revealed theology. As I read and read the New Atlantis, I am beginning to see that the society in the story is definitely a scientific society. Also, in the New Atlantis, the need for man to be driven does not exist, also the scarcity is demolished because there is no need for money. It is all based off of science. I can agree on some aspects of science and religion. However, there are a few points that I can make as a Christian as to why religion is not science. The first point is the creation of the world. I do not believe it was science that created the world, I believe it was God who created the heavens and the Earth and everything that lives on it. This can even go as far as believing in evolution, the science of believing man evolved instead of being created. I do not agree with evolution in any aspect of the science, not only have I been taught not to, but also my heart does not believe it. Don’t get me wrong, science and...

Words: 690 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Creation vs Evolution

...“How the Bible and evolution clashes, why is the knowledge of the Doctrine of Creation is important to understand?” THEO 525 LUO (fall 2013) Systematic Theology I Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary October 11, 2013 Creation and Evolution clashes, when there are changes being made to the age of the earth and the creation of man. The structure is described in the Bible as God created it; however, it describes the earth before the six days of creation. When thinking about the integration of evolutionary principles, as far as the scientific laws are concerned, there is no difference between the origin of the earth and all of its life. Could the Big Bang theory have happened? The Gap Theory, everything made out of nothing. Is the Gap Theory real? Luther sided with the Bible and creation, is his blessing relevant today? Was the earth created out of nothing, no previous atoms did God use? God created the heavens and the earth in six days so we had the seventh day for Shabbat. The Progressive Creation explains the Genesis flood and the six days of creation. So the question is could God really have created everything in six literal days? If so, where did the origins of life come from; and what about the Law of Nature, their survival of the fittest? How big is the rift between the evolutionist and the creationist? Can we trust the Bible to tell us the truth? These are the questions that I will be looking for an answer to. In evolution and creation of religious...

Words: 4901 - Pages: 20

Premium Essay

The Advncement Keeping the Faith in an Evolutionary Age

...Introduction to Apologetics Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary Edwin S. Krzyzek (ID# 25767621) June 16th, 2013 Introduction The scales of theology have shifted. The balance of human epistemology has shifted from a higher creator to cosmic accident. The vast majority of history has shown humans to be theistic; the most recent dot on the string of time has been that of naturalism. Where Christianity has dominated western thinking for so long, it now finds itself in the minority voice of reason. Even Christians themselves have taken to blending their views to remain contemporary. L Russ Bush addresses this proliferation of naturalism in The Advancement. Brief Summary Bush produces an eight chapter discourse on the evolution, propagation and fallacy of a view that espouses inevitable naturalistic progress. One that believes biological life and humans in particular are evolving into a constant state of improvement. That believes science to be the replacement of God. Bush coins this worldview, “the Advancement”. Bush says that Christian stability has been replaced by naturalisms unstable relativity. Meaning no longer has meaning. Truth itself is subjective and new is always better. Bush begins by introducing a number of pre-modern and modern philosophers. Bush succinctly steps us through the evolution of this modern thinking and contrasts that against the Christian worldview. He outlines the ascension of scientific method and Darwinian dominance, noting the...

Words: 361 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Relation Between Science and Religion

...on What is the Relation between Science and Religion William Lane Craig Examines several ways in which science and theology relate to each other. Back in 1896 the president of Cornell University Andrew Dickson White published a book entitled A History of the Warfare of Science with Theology in Christendom. Under White’s influence, the metaphor of “warfare” to describe the relations between science and the Christian faith became very widespread during the first half of the 20th century. The culturally dominant view in the West—even among Christians—came to be that science and Christianity are not allies in the search for truth, but adversaries. To illustrate, several years ago I had a debate with a philosopher of science at Simon Fraser University in Vancouver , Canada, on the question “Are Science and Religion Mutually Irrelevant?” When I walked onto the campus, I saw that the Christian students sponsoring the debate had advertised it with large banners and posters proclaiming “Science vs. Christianity.” The students were perpetuating the same sort of warfare mentality that Andrew Dickson White proclaimed over a hundred years ago. What has happened, however, in the second half of this century is that historians and philosophers of science have come to realize that this supposed history of warfare is a myth. As Thaxton and Pearcey point out in their recent book The Soul of Science, for over 300 years between the rise of modern science in the 1500’s and the late 1800s the relationship...

Words: 4080 - Pages: 17

Free Essay

Religion

...JOURNAL ARTICLE CRITIQUE of VandenBerg, Mary L. "What general revelation does (and does not) tell us." Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith 62.1 (2010): 16-24 Introduction: The goal of this work is to exam and critique an article about Reformed theology, an area regarding the relationship between the physical world and the Bible, and discussing common misconceptions regarding the harmonization of the Bible and the natural world. This review will cover a quick summation of the article, followed by a critical analysis about its main ideas and points. The author, Mary Vandenberg, believes while the Reformed theological tradition’s basic idea of harmonizing the physical world and the Bible can be appreciated, there are some misconceptions about proper concordance between the two. Summary: The author begins with an explanation of what the Reformed Tradition is, and why it is important. She continues by explaining his main point, that while the idea of concordance physical world and the Bible is a good one, there are problems specifically with how the two are in concordance with regards to the natural world, and with regards to God. She explores these ideas by examining the words of many different Reformists over the years, back to John Calvin of the 16th century. Using the words of John Calvin, she examines the idea that the revelation of God, as represented through both the natural world, and the Bible, must be viewed from the perspective of the Bible. She concludes...

Words: 839 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Ancient Near Eastern Thought and the Old Tesament

...two chapters. Chapter one is appropriately named history and methods. The resolution of this part of the book is to protect the Bible from the harm done by comparative studies which warped evidence to work against the historicity, canonicity, and divine revelation of the Bible. Chapter 1- History and Methods This chapter opens up with the rediscovery of Egypt and Mesopotamia, dating back to the 1800s and the mid 1900s. The author states that archeologists were very quickly discovering that the Bible in its entirety was completely and wholly accurate and true. It was during this time that evolution and the scientific movement was at its prime. Science was progressing. IT was during this time that science and theology began to clash. The truth of the Bible was being fought against on all sides and was quickly being twisted. New data that confirmed the themes of parallel theologies to the Old Testament were being uncovered by archeologists. For people who have an interest in understanding the Bible, it...

Words: 3469 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Paper 2 - the Rise of Fundamentalism

...--------------- PERSONAL OBSERVATIONS----------------------------------------------------------------------------- CONCLUSION------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BIBLIOGRAPHY---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 Introduction The word fundamentalism is surrounded and associated with disturbing controversy in our contemporary society. Although the term fundamentalism has become a somewhat theological dirty word, in connection with the explosive theory of evolution, espoused by Charles Darwin; and in relation to the world famous Scopes trial, the...

Words: 1738 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Charles Darwin's On The Origin Of Species By Means Of Natural Selection

...Charles Darwin’s scientific literature book, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, was published in 1859. However, in 1872, the title was changed to The Origin of Species (cite). Although it is popularized that Darwin’s book directly showcases his theory of evolution, religious and social aspects created a biased look towards his discoveries. On the contrary, his work ultimately overshadowed the superficial understanding and proved logic in the scientific discussion of evolution. Darwin asserted that species evolved from one another, rather than through the creation of God, through the process of natural selection. His intention for his book was to persuade...

Words: 384 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Karen Gould Collection: A Narrative Analysis

...During the class expedition to the Karen Gould Collection at the Spenser Art Reference Library, I was entranced by piece labeled "no 3". This piece from the late 15th century resonated with my fascination of the union between scholasticism and theology. Furthermore, this artifact provides a glimpse into how individuals analyzed the Bible and interpreted its meaning. This paper will discuss the physical characteristics of the printed text, its connection to themes within the course, and my personal insights on the medieval period gained from my interactions with this artifact. Piece number three of the Karen Gould Collection was a commentary on Paul's Letter to the Hebrews, chapter two, verses one through seven. It was printed in 1497 on paper material, thus classifying the piece as an incunabulum. Consisting of a folio design, the page was double sided, had dimensions of 322mm x 207mm, two columns of 71 lines and no water marks. On the recto side of the filio, the title, translated Paul's Epistle, was at the top center. The entire text was written in Latin, with Paul's epistle (displayed in two columns) located in a rectangular text...

Words: 1308 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Humanist Manifesto By Paul Kurtz: Secular Humanism

... Life isn’t concerned with the afterlife, but living a good life while focusing on immanent or immediate values. Secular humanist like to do so, “without seeking some transcendent, good reference point as one gets in theistic religion.” This allows the Secular Humanist to have a compound worldview that affects their daily lives and eliminates any inferiority outside of the humanist worldview. Noebel had this to say of the secular humanism worldview, “…Secular Humanism is a comprehensive worldview that consists of a theology (atheism), philosophy (metaphysical naturalism), ethics (moral relativeism), biology (spontaneous generation/evolution), psychology (self-actualization), sociology (feminism/homosexualism), law (positivism), politics (globalism), economics (socialism), history (French Enlightenment II), Kurtz acknowledges the three main pillars of any worldview viz., theology, philosophy and ethics.” This general statement, more specifically the theology, philosophy and ethics will serve as the foundation of which I will conduct my evaluation. ...

Words: 632 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Respecting Employees as the Image of God

...Name: Steven Gemma Writing Style Used: Turabian Course and Section Number: THEO 202 – D09 Respecting Employees as the Image of God Most Christians believe that humans were created in the image of God. This belief is foundational to the Christian faith. Being fashioned in God’s image endows even the lowliest of sinners with “intrinsic worth”. Because all humans have intrinsic value, managers have a duty to interact with subordinates and customers in a way that reflects God’s love. All people, including poorly performing workers and unreasonable clients, should be “love[d] because he first loved us” (1 John 4:19 NIV). Many generations of Christians have been taught that humankind was created in the image of God. Scripture describes the creation of man in Genesis 1: 26-28. Most Christians interpret the passage in Genesis 1:27 to mean that humans are created in the physical likeness of God. However, the concept of the image of God goes much deeper than a reference to the simple physical likeness of the Creator. The concept also known as imago Dei includes a purpose of humanity. Specifically, following the creation of humankind, God bestowed upon humanity the charge of flourishing, filling the earth, and exercising dominion over the other creatures. Thus, imago Dei describes humanity’s purpose in life and the sense of self-worth. The concept of imago Dei reappears in Genesis 5. This passage reveals that humankind was created in the image of God and Seth was born in the...

Words: 1243 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Cosmos-Bio Discussion

...Discussion 4-Evolution and ethics After the reading I did some research on “Eugenics” define as the belief and practice which aims at improving the genetic quality of the human population. By preventing the procreation of persons socially inadequate from defective inheritance trough eugenical sterilization. I think this is a crucial matter. The major issue on this paper was how intelligence factors is correlated with social class. And what is the clear definition of “improvement of human or better humans”. What criteria define potential person supposedly to carry degenerate hereditary qualities? Now we know that Carrie Buck case was never about mental deficiency but a matter of sexual morality and social deviance. I believe eugenic measure lead inevitable to not ethical reasons. Ecumenists believe that by preventing the reproduction of people with degenerate hereditary qualities, the next generation of human will be improved and better the than previous which in some extend can be consider as the evolution of humankind Nonmoral Nature I used to see the nature as kind and full of moral teaching. I think that is because we only observe the nature in that perceptive “learn from nature”. On the other hand, nature can be cruel. The naturally cruel behavior of the “ichneumon fly” and other carnivore animal illustrate that other side of nature (battle, conquest, horror, survival) However, according to natural theology; this view of nature (senseless cruelty in the animal...

Words: 347 - Pages: 2