Premium Essay

Failed Amendments

In: Social Issues

Submitted By aliciahenn
Words 1208
Pages 5
The Equal Rights Amendment is one of the twenty-seven failed amendments to the United States Constitution. This amendment would give equal rights to men and women, under federal and state laws within the United States. The amendment was written in 1923, by Alice Paul, a suffragist leader and founder of the National Woman’s Party. It was presented at every Congress from 1923, until 1972 when it was passed and sent to the states for ratification. However, only 35 out of the 38 required states, ratified the amendment, it was given an extension until 1982, but still failed to pass and has become extinct within Congress. The amendment has been proposed at every Congress since its failure to be ratified.

The proposed amendments states that “Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.” The amendment has three sections, and this statement is featured as the first. The second section states that “The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article,” and the third section states that “This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification.” Essentially, the amendment would affirm the equal application of the United States Constitution, to both sexes. However, according to some opposers of the Equal Rights Amendment, it would also take away some of the rights granted to women in previous years. The amendment would require women to sign up for the draft and serve in combat anytime men were conscripted. It would also abolish the presumption that husbands should support their wives, and take away social security benefits for wives and widows. In addition, it would give the federal courts, and federal government, power to reinterpret laws passed that make distinction based on gender(marriage,divorce,alimony).

The Equal Rights…...

Similar Documents

Free Essay


...Lokpal Bill fiasco Lokpal is an independent ombudsman body (Legal Representative) in India which will deal with the corruption. It was first introduced in 1968 in the Loksabha(Lower house) by Shanti Bushan.But it failed to pass in the Rajyasabha(Upper house).Eight futile attempts were made to pass the bill since the introduction. Another attempt was made by UPA II on 27th December 2011, which was passed in Loksabha but it is pending with Rajyasabha. Congress passed the bill in the Loksabha with the help of SP and BSP walking out, showing their opposition with the intention to help the government to pass the bill by reducing the required vote. Many amendments were raised by main opposition party BJP and the left but none of them succeeded in getting them passed because Congress was adamant in accepting the opposition's demands. As the bill passed in the Loksabha it was placed before the Rajyasabha where the Congress is minority which was forced to accept the amendments. Here the largest ally TMC opposed the bill and introduced the amendments. Two amendments were taken in hand by most of the opposition parties. One for autonomy of the CBI and the other for the creation of Lokayukta in states should be left with the state governments. If the Congress accepts the amendments in the Rajyasabha then the bill needs to be placed again in the Loksabha for the approval, so that the bill cannot be passed in the winter session. If the bill was put to vote in the current form then......

Words: 566 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Bill of Rights and Amendments

...Bill of Rights and Amendments Bill of Rights and Amendments The United States Constitution was recognized to Americans as a vague statement in clarifying the privileges and the rights of individuals and centralizing the power within the government itself. With the passing of the Bill of Rights and the first ten amendments, it grants the people to what is said to be their “natural rights” following additional rights that have significantly changed our society. Amendments and Constitution According to the Constitution, an amendment may be proposed and be presented, where it is put to a two thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. The original article is then forwarded for processing and publication to NARA's Office of the Federal Register (OFR) (U.S. Constitution, 2011). The OFR maintains the document until it is either adopted or a failed amendment, then it is transferred for protection to the National Archives. Soon after a proposed amendment is ratified by three-fourths of the states, it becomes a part of the Constitution. (U.S. Constitution, 2011) Not all proposed amendments are accepted and must meet certain constitutional purpose to be passed, for example: after the Declaration of Independence in 1776 and stating that “all men are created equal” the institutionalized system of servitude was a reason to pass to what is now the 13th Amendment of the Constitution and the abolition of slavery. This amendment provided that neither...

Words: 1340 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Tobacco Case

...Judge Powell summarized that this case presents the question whether a regulation of the Public Service Commission of the State of New York violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments because it completely bans promotional advertising by an electrical utility, 447 U.S. 557, which is closely related to the tobacco cases. Several opinions presented by Judge Powell can apply in these cases. First, in applying the First Amendment to this area, Judge Powell rejected the “highly paternalistic” view that government has complete power to suppress or regulate commercial speech. Second, the Judge also believed that if the communication is neither misleading nor related to unlawful activity, the government’s power is more restricted. The government agency must assert a substantial interest to be achieved by restrictions on commercial speech. Moreover, the regulatory technique must be in proportion to that interest. Furthermore, the Central Hudson case set the standards as for whether a governmental restriction on speech is constitutionally admissible. It also provided several tests as for whether the restriction is constitutionally admissible. The Central Hudson case, as a key precedent, also developed a four-part analysis for similar cases. a) Determine whether the expression is protected by the First Amendment. For commercial speech to come within that provision, it at least must concern lawful activity and not be misleading. b) Examine whether the asserted governmental......

Words: 2777 - Pages: 12

Free Essay

Gun Control

...they say, should lead to peace. Charles Krauthammer wrote about this in “The Washington Post” in an article titled “Disarm The People.” He wrote, “…a civilized society must disarm its citizenry if it is to have a modicum of domestic tranquility…” Pro-gun activists, on the other hand, see gun-control as a threat not only to their self-defense, but also to their Second Amendment right. In an issue of American Survival Guide, Howard J. Fezell wrote an essay: “Your Individual Right to Keep and Bear Arms,” during which he made plain this fact: gun-prohibitionists have completely ignored numerous rulings of the Supreme Court in which the Supreme Court has stated the Second Amendment as an individual right, not a collective right. Also, they believe it to be a failed experiment. This is obvious in a statement by David Lampo: “The basic premise of the gun control movement, that easy access to guns causes higher crime, is contradicted by the facts, by history and by reason.” According to statistics, gun bans - the ultimate goal of gun control activists - has failed completely. The right to bear arms”, an amendment so prioritized by our founding fathers that it earned the very second spot on the list of birth rights as Americans. However, with constant tragedies striking the United States, such as massacres in public high schools and universities, mall shootings, and attempted assassinations on state representatives, it’s no wonder law makers are constantly debating the......

Words: 313 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Legal Reasoning

...What is causing a lack of constitutional privacy? The United States of America is a country founded on the principles of seven founding fathers. These men strived to produce a constitutionally based system, a system which was based upon certain doctrines, one of which was privacy. This topic has been mentioned subtly in the Bill of Right and the Declaration of Independence, such as in the first amendment, the right to free speech, and in the fourth amendment, the right to no unreasonable searches and seizures. After all, we live in a country whose majority population believes in privacy being a god given right. Since America was founded on privacy, it seems absurd that the government has to look over our shoulders for insight information. A prime example of how the government interferes with the privacy of taxpaying citizens is through the U. S. Patriot Act. Yes, it was designed to prevent future terrorist attacks but it seems as if there are much more cons than pros; the checks and balances simply do not equal out. The U.S. PATRIOT Act is an acronym for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act. This provision was passed in 2001 very soon after the multiple terrorist acts on September 11th, 2001. Under the supervision of George W. Bush, the bill was passed through congress and was enacted on within an amazing 6 weeks! The bill can simply be......

Words: 887 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

The Constitution

...Constitution Constitutional Amendments: • Founding Fathers initially desired TO MAKE AMENDMENT DIFFICULT although they had recognized the need for eventually doing so. • TWO-STAGE PROCESS – The processes required super-majorities of more than 50% such as two-thirds or a three-quarters majority. • Once the amendment has been proposed it is sent to the states for ratification. An amendment can be ratified by three-quarters of the state legislatures or by state constitutional conventions in three-quarters of the states. Of the 27 amendments to the constitution only one has been ratified by state constitutional conventions – The 21st amendment which repealed the 18th amendment and ended prohibition. • Only six amendments have failed at the ratification stage in over 220 years. The most recent was the amendment designed to guarantee equal rights for women. Proposed in 1972, only 35 state legislatures ratified it – three short of the required ¾. Amendments proposed by: Amendments ratified by: Congress: 2/3 majority in both houses required State legislature: ¾ of the state legislature must vote to ratify National constitutional convention: called by at least 2/3s of the states State constitutional convention: ¾ of the states must hold conventions and vote to ratify The Bill of Rights were a group of ten amendments proposed together by Congress in September 1789 and ratified together by ¾ of the states in December 1791. The Bill of Rights was created to sugar the impact......

Words: 418 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Case Brief

...held that Joyce Sell failed to present a prima facie cause of action for negligent emotional distress. This is due to the lack of evidence establishing a medically significant and diagnosable emotional harm. Issue Is the Supreme Court correct in its holding that the Appellee in this case failed to present evidence establishing a medically diagnosable and significant emotional harm as well as a prima facie cause of action for negligent emotional distress? Holding The court ruled the district court’s decision is reversed. The cause is remanded with directions to dismiss. Rationale The court referenced previous case Parrish v. Omaha Pub. Power Dist. in their decision. In that case it was determined for a valid claim of negligent emotional distress the plaintiff must “show that a negligent act of the defendant’s proximately caused her to suffer extreme emotional distress.” In this case, the court ruled that the hospital was negligent and was the cause of the injury. The Appellee however, failed to establish emotional distress; which is both medically significant and diagnosable. Disposition The trial court's judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded with directions to dismiss. Facts Clarence Gideon (Petitioner) allegedly broke into a poolroom intending to commit a misdemeanor. A felony under Florida law, Gideon was charged in a Florida state court. Gideon requested counsel from the court due to financial need citing the Sixth Amendment. The court......

Words: 732 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay


...agreed to hold depositions, Robin’s Wood failed to produce its employee for three times. After over one year Flanzraich asked for a default judgment against the company, which tried to defend itself by arguing that it has made diligent efforts to locate Monforte. The trial judge granted the motion to strike the answer of the company and determined amount of the following damages: $22,631 for medical expenses, $150,000 for past pain and suffering, and $300,000 for future pain and suffering. One day later, Flanraich died, of other causes. Robin’s Wood appealed. 3. Issue: Did the trial court abuse its discretion by striking the defendant’s answer? 4. Rule: No. A court, in its discretion, may invoke the drastic remedy of striking an answer if it determines that the defendant’s failure to comply with discovery demands is willful and contumacious. 5. Analysis: The willful and contumacious character of [defendant’s] conduct may be inferred from the defendant’s non-compliance with [three] court orders directing such a deposition. In other words, Robin’s Wood did not produce Monforte while he was still employed nor did they provided information when Monforte’s employment was terminated. All of that was done to the benefit of the defendant taking into consideration that plaintiff was elderly person. 6. Conclusion: Judgment affirmed; the defendant failed to produce Monforte for deposition during the time he was under its employ and failed to comply with the court orders......

Words: 1509 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

15th Amendment

...An assignment on 15th amendment of the Bangladesh constitution. The 15th amendment of the Bangladesh constitution is perhaps the most debatable one in the post democratic era that follows the 1990 public upsurge against autocracy. The often pronounced justifications offered for this amendment is the ‘needs’ for returning to the spirit and contents of the founding constitution of 1972 of Bangladesh. Yet the 15th amendment rather accommodates some of the changes brought out by the 5th and 7th amendments, both made by the Martial Law regime and recently declared illegal and unconstitutional by the apex court of the country. 15th amendment, like most of the previous amendments, also largely failed to reflect comparative constitutional studies. Such study is considered essential for learning the experiences of constitutionalism in relevant jurisprudences and borrowing or adapting them in amending a nation’s own constitution. Although the 1972 constitution of Bangladesh was indigenous in part, the 1972 Constituent Assembly (led by Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman) enriched our constitution by the same process of borrowing and/or adapting from models and concepts of foreign constitutions. For example: collective responsibility of ministers to Parliament and functions of parliamentary committees were taken from UK system, the concept of fundamental principle of state policy from India and Ireland, the provisions of human rights and Judicial review from US constitutional......

Words: 2036 - Pages: 9

Free Essay


...some progress was made. A number of new liberal laws and amendments were enacted by Congress that protected the rights of all blacks under constitutional law. This laws and amendments included; the Thirteenth Amendment abolishing slavery, the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and the Fourteenth Amendment which granted blacks citizenship, the Fifteenth Amendment which gave black men the right to vote, and the Civil Rights Act of 1875 which banned racial discrimination in all public places. By the end of the 19th century, the Nation was reunited once again, and all the states in the south had abolished slavery in their own individual constitutions. However, after considering all the facts, there is no doubt that Reconstruction failed in other significant ways. First of all, after all federal troops were ordered to leave the South (in 1877), many Confederate officials and former slave owners, little by little returned to power. Before everyone knew it, all southern state legislatures have passed and had been enforcing some form of “black codes”. In addition, many of this states allowed sharecropping to evolve and become part of the fiber of the southern society, basically ensuring that the standard of living did not improve for blacks. For me personally, the final prove that the reconstruction failed, was the decision made by the Supreme Court (aided mainly by southern Democrats) to repeal the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments, as well as the Civil Rights Act of 1875. I think......

Words: 932 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Prohibition Alcohilism

...Prohibition began in 1920 and ending in 1933 in the United States. The 18th Amendment started the law which mentioned all intoxicating liquors whether it be sale, transportation, or any other related alcohol usage is prohibited. The Volstead Act also helped in enforcing prohibition for the amendment. During this time there was a lack of support in trying to ban alcohol amongst many individuals and groups but the ban still continued on thanks to the help of the Anti-Saloon League. This organization enabled legislation for the enforcement of national prohibition beginning in 1920. Although it was passed and did reduce the availability of alcohol, it failed to do what is was meant to do. Prohibition directly led to the increase in crime and corruption during the twenties, the public health problems associated with bootleg liquor, alcohol substitutes, the irritated tensions between religious, racial, social groups, and political disturbance. A nation of drunkards was persistent in the U.S. Neil Dowe gathered thousands of signatures demanding the ban of sale of alcohol. It was passed in Maine but sooner decayed over years. Temperant walked the streets and drunkenness of was no more. People found loopholes around the law such as liquor sellers hiding it underneath their pantlegs called bootleggers. Men were more occupied on drinking rather than supporting their own families. Prior to the 20th century, there had never been national attempt to restrict alcohol production in the......

Words: 1184 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Thompson V. Western States Medical Center

...outlined in the First Amendment. FACTS: Pharmacists sometimes alter the physical form of a drug, or combine various drugs with a technique known as compounding. The process is used to meet the specific needs of a particular patient. The FDA and Modernization Act of 1997 prohibited such pharmacies from promoting and advertising these compounded drugs. The Act, however, did not prohibit them from advertising the effectiveness of the drugs. Western States Medical Center was one of these groups, which advertised effectiveness via the mail and medical conferences. The group filed suit in Federal Court to enjoin the enforcement of the advertising prohibitions as a violation of the first amendment-commercial free speech. RULE OF LAW: Commercial free speech warrants constitutional protection only when it enables consumers to make “intelligent and well informed decisions.” Deceptive or misleading information subverts that value and therefore is prohibited. REASONING: The pharmacies contend that the imposed restrictions prevented truthful information from reaching the consumers. The government cannot and should not withhold information on the basis that the public might use it to make bad decisions. HOLDING AND DECISION: The FDMA’s prohibitions undermine the constitutional rights of commercial free speech. Although the restrictions may serve important governmental interests, and “even assuming” that it directly advances these interests, it failed the......

Words: 432 - Pages: 2

Free Essay


...History 2013 U.S History II Marina Garcia Ch. 15 Section Questions August 25, 2014 1. Lincoln devised the Ten percent plan, meaning those who were Confederates and had taken an oath of loyalty could rejoin the Union only if they had approved of the Thirteenth Amendment (abolishing slavery.) That being said most of the Southern states refused to do so, leaving that at a failed attempt. Thus the Wade-Davis Bill was brought about, it required fifty percent of a states white males take a loyalty oath to be readmitted to the Union. In addition the states were also required to give blacks the right to vote. Lincoln eventually pocket vetoed the bill and it ended up dying off (Pg. 447). Johnson though would think to reconstruct by pardoning those who went against the Union, and would swear to allegiance to the United States (except high ranking Confederates). Under provisional governors appointed by him, the Southern states held conventions that voided or repealed their ordinances of secession, abolished slavery, and (except South Carolina) repudiated Confederate debts (Pg. 448). 2. The Radical Republicans believed blacks were entitled to the same political rights and opportunities as whites. The Southern states began to issue black codes, Congress passed the Civil Rights Act of 1866 giving former slaves citizenship and duel process. The Congress passes The Reconstruction Act of 1867. This act divided the South into five military districts each under the command of a......

Words: 854 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Lstd302 Case Brief

...violated his Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment since he was arrested for a minor offense. Procedural History: In 1998, Albert Florence was arrested for fleeing from police officers in Essex County and was charged with obstruction of justice and use of a deadly weapon. He took a plea deal where he pleaded guilty and his charges where reduced to two lesser offenses. He was sentenced to pay a fine in monthly installments but he failed to keep up with the monthly payments. Not only did he fall behind in his monthly payments but he also failed to appear at an enforcement hearing in which caused him to have a warrant issued for his arrest. Florence paid for the outstanding balance but the warrant was never updated and remained in the database. A state trooper stopped Florence in New Jersey and arrested him after he checked the statewide computer database system and found a bench warrant for his arrest. At the detention center, he was required to shower with a delousing agent and was checked for scars, marks, gang tattoos and contraband, as he was undressed. After being there for six days, he was transferred to the Essex County Correctional Facility where he was once again searched for the same things while naked but was also exposed to a body cavity search. Once it was cleared that Florence had already paid the fine, he was released. Upon his release, he filed a 2 U. S. C. § 1983 action in federal court for violations of his Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights and argued that......

Words: 866 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Reconstruction & Rise of Industry

...Since 1877 Professor Valdenia Winn February 14, 2013 According to, radical means: 1. Of or going to the root or origin; fundamental: a radical difference. 2. Thoroughgoing or extreme, especially as regards change from accepted or traditional forms. Historians identified Congressional Reconstruction as “radical” because of how the South tried to elude the Thirteenth Amendment. Because of these extreme circumstances the federal government had to intervene, which at that point made it radical to most historians. The root of the problem was slavery and the problem solver was the Thirteenth, Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments. The Thirteenth Amendment prohibited slavery. The Fourteenth Amendment established national citizenship for persons born or naturalized in the United States. It also prohibited the states from depriving citizens of their civil rights or equal protection under the law as well as reduced state representation in the House of Representatives by the percentage of adult male citizens denied the vote. The Fifteenth Amendment forbade states to deny citizens the right to vote on the grounds of race, color, or “previous condition of servitude”. Another problem solver was the establishment of the Freedmen’s Bureau, which was there to aid former slaves get on their feet and supervise “all relief and educational activities relating to refugees and freedmen, including issuing rations, clothing and medicine.” ......

Words: 963 - Pages: 4