Free Essay

Fair Value

In: Business and Management

Submitted By syedmrk
Words 3823
Pages 16
An alternative approach to measurement that seeks to capture changes in asset and liability values over time. The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) defines fair value as "... an amount at which an asset could be exchanged between knowledgeable and willing parties in an arms length transaction".
Under the fair value measurement approach, assets and liabilities are re-measured periodically to reflect changes in their value, with the resulting change impacting either net income or other comprehensive income for the period. The result is a balance sheet that better reflects the current value of assets and liabilities. The cost is greater volatility in periodic reported performance caused by changes in fair value.
The notion of fair value accounting is intuitive when applied to quoted investments such as equities, bonds, commodities, etc. that are carried in an entity’s balance sheet at their market value. This form of fair value accounting is often termed mark-to-market accounting. However, while market prices are one aspect of fair value measurement, the term is increasingly being used to describe measurement by other means. For example, accountants often arrive at an estimate of fair value for non-quoted investments based on a model (e.g., a share option valued by applying a specialist option valuation model) or specialist opinion. Such applications of fair value measurement are referred to as mark-to-model accounting.
The IASB has followed US standard-setters in dealing with the problem of fair values that do not result from market prices. Specifically, IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement applies the following valuation hierarchy:
Level 1: fair values are derived from quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities from an active market for which an entity has immediate access
Level 2: where there are market prices available for similar (as opposed to identical) assets or liabilities
Level 3: if values for levels 1 or 2 are not available, fair value is estimated using valuation techniques
Fair value accounting is most frequently applied to financial assets and liabilities because market prices or reliable estimates thereof are most likely to exist for such elements. Proponents argue that fair value accounting for assets or liabilities better reflects current market conditions and hence provides timely information. Opponents, on the other hand, argue that fair values can be irrelevant and potentially misleading for a variety of reasons. For example, some claim that fair value is not relevant for items that are held for a long period (i.e., to maturity) as investors are not interested in interim value changes. Others argue that fair values can be distorted by market inefficiencies, investor irrationality or liquidity problems and that estimated values derived from models may lack reliability.
Finally, fair value accounting has been criticised for contributing to procyclicality in the financial system by exacerbating market swings and causing a downward spiral in financial markets. In particular, some commentators argue that emphasis on level 1 and 2 valuations makes it difficult to deviate from market prices, even if prices are below fundamentals or they give rise to contagion effects.

FRS 13 Fair Value Measurement applies to IFRSs that require or permit fair value measurements or disclosures and provides a single IFRS framework for measuring fair value and requires disclosures about fair value measurement. The Standard defines fair value on the basis of an 'exit price' notion and uses a 'fair value hierarchy', which results in a market-based, rather than entity-specific, measurement.
IFRS 13 was originally issued in May 2011 and applies to annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013.

History of IFRS 13
September 2005 Project on fair value measurement added to the IASB's agenda (history of the project)

30 November 2006 Discussion Paper Fair Value Measurements published
28 May 2009 Exposure Draft Fair Value Measurement published
29 June 2010 Exposure Draft Measurement Uncertainty Analysis Disclosure for Fair Value Measurements published
19 August 2010 Staff draft of a IFRS on fair value measurement released
12 May 2011 IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement published
1 January 2013 Effective date of IFRS 13
Related Interpretations
• None
Amendments under consideration by the IASB
• IFRS 13 — Unit of account
• Research project — Discount rates
Publications and resources
• IFRS in Focus Newsletter IASB issues new standard on fair value measurement and disclosure summarising the requirements of IFRS 13 (PDF 78k, May 2011)
• Deloitte IFRS Podcast (May 2011, 10 minutes, 7mb)
Summary of IFRS 13
Objective
IFRS 13: [IFRS 13:1]
• defines fair value
• sets out in a single IFRS a framework for measuring fair value
• requires disclosures about fair value measurements.
IFRS 13 applies when another IFRS requires or permits fair value measurements or disclosures about fair value measurements (and measurements, such as fair value less costs to sell, based on fair value or disclosures about those measurements), except for: [IFRS 13:5-7]
• share-based payment transactions within the scope of IFRS 2 Share-based Payment
• leasing transactions within the scope of IAS 17 Leases
• measurements that have some similarities to fair value but that are not fair value, such as net realisable value in IAS 2 Inventories or value in use in IAS 36 Impairment of Assets.
Additional exemptions apply to the disclosures required by IFRS 13.
Key definitions
[IFRS 13:Appendix A]
Fair value The price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date
Active market A market in which transactions for the asset or liability take place with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis
Exit price The price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability
Highest and best use The use of a non-financial asset by market participants that would maximise the value of the asset or the group of assets and liabilities (e.g. a business) within which the asset would be used
Most advantageous market The market that maximises the amount that would be received to sell the asset or minimises the amount that would be paid to transfer the liability, after taking into account transaction costs and transport costs
Principal market The market with the greatest volume and level of activity for the asset or liability
Fair value hierarchy
Overview
IFRS 13 seeks to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures through a 'fair value hierarchy'. The hierarchy categorises the inputs used in valuation techniques into three levels. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to (unadjusted) quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. [IFRS 13:72]
If the inputs used to measure fair value are categorised into different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the fair value measurement is categorised in its entirety in the level of the lowest level input that is significant to the entire measurement (based on the application of judgement). [IFRS 13:73]
Level 1 inputs
Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity can access at the measurement date. [IFRS 13:76]
A quoted market price in an active market provides the most reliable evidence of fair value and is used without adjustment to measure fair value whenever available, with limited exceptions. [IFRS 13:77]
If an entity holds a position in a single asset or liability and the asset or liability is traded in an active market, the fair value of the asset or liability is measured within Level 1 as the product of the quoted price for the individual asset or liability and the quantity held by the entity, even if the market's normal daily trading volume is not sufficient to absorb the quantity held and placing orders to sell the position in a single transaction might affect the quoted price. [IFRS 13:80]
Level 2 inputs
Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted market prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. [IFRS 13:81]
Level 2 inputs include:
• quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets
• quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active
• inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, for example o interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals o implied volatilities o credit spreads
• inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means ('market-corroborated inputs').
Level 3 inputs
Level 3 inputs inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. [IFRS 13:86]
Unobservable inputs are used to measure fair value to the extent that relevant observable inputs are not available, thereby allowing for situations in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date. An entity develops unobservable inputs using the best information available in the circumstances, which might include the entity's own data, taking into account all information about market participant assumptions that is reasonably available. [IFRS 13:87-89]
Measurement of fair value
Overview of fair value measurement approach
The objective of a fair value measurement is to estimate the price at which an orderly transaction to sell the asset or to transfer the liability would take place between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. A fair value measurement requires an entity to determine all of the following: [IFRS 13:B2]
• the particular asset or liability that is the subject of the measurement (consistently with its unit of account)
• for a non-financial asset, the valuation premise that is appropriate for the measurement (consistently with its highest and best use)
• the principal (or most advantageous) market for the asset or liability
• the valuation technique(s) appropriate for the measurement, considering the availability of data with which to develop inputs that represent the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability and the level of the fair value hierarchy within which the inputs are categorised.
Guidance on measurement
IFRS 13 provides the guidance on the measurement of fair value, including the following:
• An entity takes into account the characteristics of the asset or liability being measured that a market participant would take into account when pricing the asset or liability at measurement date (e.g. the condition and location of the asset and any restrictions on the sale and use of the asset) [IFRS 13:11]
• Fair value measurement assumes an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions [IFRS 13:15]
• Fair value measurement assumes a transaction taking place in the principal market for the asset or liability, or in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset or liability [IFRS 13:24]
• A fair value measurement of a non-financial asset takes into account its highest and best use [IFRS 13:27]
• A fair value measurement of a financial or non-financial liability or an entity's own equity instruments assumes it is transferred to a market participant at the measurement date, without settlement, extinguishment, or cancellation at the measurement date [IFRS 13:34]
• The fair value of a liability reflects non-performance risk (the risk the entity will not fulfil an obligation), including an entity's own credit risk and assuming the same non-performance risk before and after the transfer of the liability [IFRS 13:42]
• An optional exception applies for certain financial assets and financial liabilities with offsetting positions in market risks or counterparty credit risk, provided conditions are met (additional disclosure is required). [IFRS 13:48, IFRS 13:96]
Valuation techniques
An entity uses valuation techniques appropriate in the circumstances and for which sufficient data are available to measure fair value, maximising the use of relevant observable inputs and minimising the use of unobservable inputs. [IFRS 13:61, IFRS 13:67]
The objective of using a valuation technique is to estimate the price at which an orderly transaction to sell the asset or to transfer the liability would take place between market participants and the measurement date under current market conditions. Three widely used valuation techniques are: [IFRS 13:62]
• market approach – uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable (similar) assets, liabilities, or a group of assets and liabilities (e.g. a business)
• cost approach – reflects the amount that would be required currently to replace the service capacity of an asset (current replacement cost)
• income approach – converts future amounts (cash flows or income and expenses) to a single current (discounted) amount, reflecting current market expectations about those future amounts.
In some cases, a single valuation technique will be appropriate, whereas in others multiple valuation techniques will be appropriate. [IFRS 13:63]
Disclosure
Disclosure objective
IFRS 13 requires an entity to disclose information that helps users of its financial statements assess both of the following: [IFRS 13:91]
• for assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis in the statement of financial position after initial recognition, the valuation techniques and inputs used to develop those measurements
• for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), the effect of the measurements on profit or loss or other comprehensive income for the period.
Disclosure exemptions
The disclosure requirements are not required for: [IFRS 13:7]
• plan assets measured at fair value in accordance with IAS 19 Employee Benefits
• retirement benefit plan investments measured at fair value in accordance with IAS 26 Accounting and Reporting by Retirement Benefit Plans
• assets for which recoverable amount is fair value less costs of disposal in accordance with IAS 36 Impairment of Assets.
Identification of classes
Where disclosures are required to be provided for each class of asset or liability, an entity determines appropriate classes on the basis of the nature, characteristics and risks of the asset or liability, and the level of the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement is categorised. [IFRS 13:94]
Determining appropriate classes of assets and liabilities for which disclosures about fair value measurements should be provided requires judgement. A class of assets and liabilities will often require greater disaggregation than the line items presented in the statement of financial position. The number of classes may need to be greater for fair value measurements categorised within Level 3.
Some disclosures are differentiated on whether the measurements are:
• Recurring fair value measurements – fair value measurements required or permitted by other IFRSs to be recognised in the statement of financial position at the end of each reporting period
• Non-recurring fair value measurements are fair value measurements that are required or permitted by other IFRSs to be measured in the statement of financial position in particular circumstances.
Specific disclosures required
To meet the disclosure objective, the following minimum disclosures are required for each class of assets and liabilities measured at fair value (including measurements based on fair value within the scope of this IFRS) in the statement of financial position after initial recognition (note these are requirements have been summarised and additional disclosure is required where necessary): [IFRS 13:93]
• the fair value measurement at the end of the reporting period*
• for non-recurring fair value measurements, the reasons for the measurement*
• the level of the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurements are categorised in their entirety (Level 1, 2 or 3)*
• for assets and liabilities held at the reporting date that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, the amounts of any transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the reasons for those transfers and the entity's policy for determining when transfers between levels are deemed to have occurred, separately disclosing and discussing transfers into and out of each level
• for fair value measurements categorised within Level 2 and Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, a description of the valuation technique(s) and the inputs used in the fair value measurement, any change in the valuation techniques and the reason(s) for making such change (with some exceptions)*
• for fair value measurements categorised within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement (with some exceptions)
• for recurring fair value measurements categorised within Level 3of the fair value hierarchy, a reconciliation from the opening balances to the closing balances, disclosing separately changes during the period attributable to the following: o total gains or losses for the period recognised in profit or loss, and the line item(s) in profit or loss in which those gains or losses are recognised – separately disclosing the amount included in profit or loss that is attributable to the change in unrealised gains or losses relating to those assets and liabilities held at the end of the reporting period, and the line item(s) in profit or loss in which those unrealised gains or losses are recognised o total gains or losses for the period recognised in other comprehensive income, and the line item(s) in other comprehensive income in which those gains or losses are recognised o purchases, sales, issues and settlements (each of those types of changes disclosed separately) o the amounts of any transfers into or out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, the reasons for those transfers and the entity's policy for determining when transfers between levels are deemed to have occurred. Transfers into Level 3 shall be disclosed and discussed separately from transfers out of Level 3
• for fair value measurements categorised within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, a description of the valuation processes used by the entity
• for recurring fair value measurements categorised within Level 3of the fair value hierarchy: o a narrative description of the sensitivity of the fair value measurement to changes in unobservable inputs if a change in those inputs to a different amount might result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement. If there are interrelationships between those inputs and other unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement, the entity also provides a description of those interrelationships and of how they might magnify or mitigate the effect of changes in the unobservable inputs on the fair value measurement o for financial assets and financial liabilities, if changing one or more of the unobservable inputs to reflect reasonably possible alternative assumptions would change fair value significantly, an entity shall state that fact and disclose the effect of those changes. The entity shall disclose how the effect of a change to reflect a reasonably possible alternative assumption was calculated
• if the highest and best use of a non-financial asset differs from its current use, an entity shall disclose that fact and why the non-financial asset is being used in a manner that differs from its highest and best use*.
'*' in the list above indicates that the disclosure is also applicable to a class of assets or liabilities which is not measured at fair value in the statement of financial position but for which the fair value is disclosed. [IFRS 13:97]
Quantitative disclosures are required to be presented in a tabular format unless another format is more appropriate. [IFRS 13:99]
Effective date and transition
[IFRS 13:Appendix C]
IFRS 13 is applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013. An entity may apply IFRS 13 to an earlier accounting period, but if doing so it must disclose the fact.
Application is required prospectively as of the beginning of the annual reporting period in which the IFRS is initially applied. Comparative information need not be disclosed for periods before initial application.

Advantages or Disadvantages of Fair Value Accounting by Jay Way, Demand Media
Fair value accounting is a financial reporting approach, also known as the “mark-to-market” accounting practice, under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Using fair value accounting, companies measure and report the value of certain assets and liabilities on the basis of their actual or estimated fair market prices. Changes in asset or liability values over time generate unrealized gains or losses for the assets held and liabilities outstanding, increasing or reducing net income, as well as equity in the balance sheet.
Sponsored Link
Demo CRM Features: Free
No software to install. It's simple and quick! Give it a try, free. www.salesforce.com/Official_Site Accurate Valuation
A primary advantage of fair value accounting is that it provides accurate asset and liability valuation on an ongoing basis to users of a company’s reported financial information. When the price of an asset or liability has increased or is expected to increase, the company marks up the value of the asset or liability to its current market price to reflect what it would receive if it sold the asset or would have to pay to relieve itself from the liability. Conversely, the company marks down the value of an asset or liability to reflect any decrease in the market price.
True Income
Fair value accounting limits a company’s ability to potentially manipulate its reported net income. Sometimes management may purposely arrange certain asset sales, for example, to use gains or losses from the sales to increase or decrease net income as reported at its desired time. Using fair value accounting, gains or losses from any price change for an asset or liability are reported in the period in which they occur. While an increase in asset value or a decrease in liability value adds to net income, a decrease in asset value or an increase in liability value reduces net income.
Value Reversal
Fair value accounting can also present challenges to companies and users of their reported financial information. Conditions of the markets in which certain assets and liabilities are traded may fluctuate often and even become volatile at times. Applying fair value accounting, companies reevaluate the current value of certain assets and liabilities even in volatile market conditions, potentially creating large swings in the value of those assets and liabilities. However, as markets stabilize, such value changes likely reverse back to their previous normal levels, making any reported losses or gains temporary, which means fair value accounting may have provided misleading information at the time.
Market Effects
The use of fair value accounting may further affect a down market adversely. For example, after an asset has been revalued downward because of drops in the current market trading prices, the lower value of the asset could trigger greater selling of the asset at a potentially even more depressed price. Without valuation markdown as required by fair value accounting, companies may not feel the need to sell an asset in a down market to prevent potentially further downward valuation of the asset. Absent additional selling pressures, the market may stabilize over time, which would help preserve the value of the asset.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Fair Value

...defined the fair value of an asset as the price that would be received by the holder of that asset in an orderly transaction. On September 30, 2008, SEC and FASB issued a joint clarification which stressed that fair market value is not the price that would be received in distressed sale or forced liquidation. They also provide guidance that estimates of fair value can be made using the expected cash flow of such assets, provided the estimates has also reflects the adjustment of a willing buyer in the risk of default. This concept created transparency on the value of the assets which was easily confirmed by the auditors and users of the financial statements. However, during the recent economic crisis, this concept has created havoc on the balance sheets of some major financial companies. These financial companies were forced to write down assets in which the market has dried up and made it hard for them to value these financial assets. Since these financial assets were also used as a requirement for the liquidity ratio of some financial institutions, the write down of these financial assets caused the ratio to fall and trigger some margin calls. Many financial institutions decided to horde cash in order to preserve their ratio which caused the credit market to dry up. Most bankers argued the requirement of fair value accounting unfairly punished financial companies and caused their ratio to fall. Thus, they were lobbying the governments to ease up on fair value accounting...

Words: 660 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Fair Value Measurement

...prospective criticism of Fair Value Measurement 1. Analysis of nature of Fair Value Measurement The implement basis of SFAS157 is in an efficient market. Its hierarchy of fair value measurement confirms the priority of market price for the same or similar position. But under the credit crisis, entity will expect to reverse the unrealized losses partially at present or totally in the future. Based on this assumption, some entities preferred to report amortized costs or level 3 mark-to-model fair values, arguing that level 2 mark-to–market fair values will raise larger unrealized losses. [8] In an illiquidity market, the impairment of assets caused potential risk of system and overreaction of investors. The substantial decreasing values enter into the unrealized losses, which further force investors sell their assets for financing in order to mask financial statements or to accord with the investment policy. The consequence is that counterparties are unwilling to transact with those whose assets are continually impaired. In this situation, investment having high leverage will undertake the crisis of liquidity. The bankruptcy of these investment banks may cause the liquidation of hedge fund or other issuing bond, as well as the investment loss of their counterparties. When crisis extends, so called fair value is no longer “fair”. [9] In the prosperous economic market, the carry out of fair value measurement follows the bubble price, relative to the basic value of assets and liability...

Words: 884 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Fair Value Measurement

...FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT: IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES AND CHALLENGES (PART 1) (by Tuam Kwok Choon and Ng Kean Kok) INTRODUCTION Since the promulgation of fair value accounting by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), the subject matter has been hotly debated by industry players and professionals of the accounting fraternity the world over. Many problems and pitfalls have been highlighted on the "mark-to-market" premise. For example, David Gwilliam and Richard H.G. Jackson (2008) noted that Enron "was able to 'monetize' physical assets so as to bring them within the remit of mark to market accounting", suggesting misuse of fair value measurement. Fair value is said to be superior to other forms of measurement because it is easily understood by investors and stakeholders. It is also timely, neutral, representationally faithful, reliable, relevant, comparable and consistent. Fair value reporting is deemed to be more transparent and investor-confident. However equally important is that fair value measurement is subject to constraints such as human judgment, the location and condition of the asset/liability being measured, the determination of market, the most advantageous market value as against the entity's perspective, transaction price presumption (exit price verses entry price in different markets), the bid-ask spread of financial instsruments, and transportation cost exclusion, to name a few. Brief definition of fair value: Defined as, “The price that would be received...

Words: 2356 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Fair Value Accounting

...The concept of Fair Value Fair value is defined as “the amount for which an asset could be exchanged between knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm’s length transaction”. Prior to the introduction of Fair Value Accounting (FVA), accounting was carried out on a historical cost basis. However there were many limitations of Historical Cost accounting (HCA). HCA assumes money holds a constant purchasing power. It ignores specific price-level change, general price-level change and fluctuations in exchange rates. During inflationary periods, HCA can become irrelevant and can lead to an erosion of operating capacity. IASB framework states “the objective of financial statements is to provide information about the financial position, performance and changes in financial position of an entity that is useful to a wide range of users in making economic decisions. It also states “financial statements also show the results of stewardship of management, or accountability of management for the resources entrusted to it”. FVA is superior to historical cost accounting for these purposes. FVA is dominant in numerous IFRS’s and IAS’s. The IASB have yet to finalise an IFRS on fair value measurement, but it is expected it will have been completed by early 2011. Furthermore, the IASB is developing extra educational material to accompany the publication of the IFRS on fair value measurement. This material will give a description on the thought process for the measurement of assets, liabilities...

Words: 3059 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Fair Value

...Fair value accounting is a financial reporting approach in which companies are required or permitted to measure and report on an ongoing basis certain assets and liabilities (generally financial instruments) at estimates of the prices they would receive if they were to sell the assets or would pay if they were to be relieved of the liabilities. Under fair value accounting, companies report losses when the fair values of their assets decrease or liabilities increase. Those losses reduce companies’ reported equity and may also reduce companies’ reported net income In response to the credit crunch, some parties (generally financial institutions) have criticized fair value accounting, including FAS 157’s measurement guidance. Those criticisms have included: • Reported losses are misleading because they are temporary and will reverse as markets return to normal • Fair values are difficult to estimate and thus are unreliable • Reported losses have adversely affected market prices yielding further losses and increasing the overall risk of the financial system. During the ongoing credit crunch,1 the markets for subprime and some other asset and liability positions have been severely illiquid and disorderly in other respects. This has led various (possibly self-interested) parties to raise three main potential criticisms of fair value accounting. First, unrealized losses recognized under fair value accounting may reverse over time. Second, market...

Words: 529 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Why Fair Value Is the Rule

...In the article “Why “Fair Value” Is The Rule”, the author Karthik Ramanna, has many valid points as to why fair value should be used in the accounting system. She states that fair value takes over for the old, worn out system of keeping books at historical value. She talks about how using fair value makes account more reliable. Also, it was believed fair value accounting was part of the reason the stock market crashed in 1929. Another point that Karthik had was why people actually support fair value. Fair value replaced the old, worn out system of keep books at historical value. With historical value, you never really need to record anything if the price becomes cheaper. It is a way for your assets to look larger than they actually are. If you record an item at fair value, you are normally reducing that value, so you are also reducing your assets. Sometimes you must actually increase the value because you paid less for the item than it is now worth. Fair value also helps with an insurance policy. If you have something that is stolen, and you do not get a settlement from your insurance company, you record the loss at the adjusted fair value. Fair value is a more reliable form of accounting, at least according to some people. It is believed that if someone is using the real cost on the books, it’ll mean that they are more accurately reporting what they have. Others believe that historic costing is more reliable because you are accurately showing what the product WAS worth. I...

Words: 662 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Fair Value Accounting and the Gfc

...economy. Speculation was rife that accounting standards, in particular, fair value accounting was the prime reason for this significant meltdown. “This sparked a fierce debate with some experts believing that fair value accounting was primary cause of the crisis whilst others considered that it exacerbated it. On the other side of the debate were those commentators that believed that fair value accounting was successful in acting as an early warning system and effectively prevented more calamitous consequences.” (Pabuccu, 2011) In response to this speculation, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and the Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) immediately took action to review this matter and implement the necessary changes to address the uncertainty surrounding Fair Value accounting. Body Due to the economic significance of the crisis, financial commentators around the world analysed the situation, made comment, pointed the finger; and laid blame for this event. Due to the speculation, a ferocious debate commenced, with many of them believing that fair-value accounting was the primary cause of this event. Bubbles and Busts have occurred throughout history and are closely linked to the periods preceding a financial crisis. According to McMahon (2011), “fair-value accounting amplifies business cycles and seems to significantly contribute to bubbles and busts.” In her opinion fair-value accounting is largely to blame for the global financial crisis due...

Words: 1804 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Benefits and Challenges..Fair Value Accounting

...| BENEFITS AND CHALLENGES OF FAIR VALUE ACCOUNTING | ACCT 525-22936 Current Issues in Accounting | Professor Kabani | Robert Larison | 10/20/2013 | In this paper I look at the benefits and challenges that are likely to follow the migration into the use of Fair Value Accounting. Perhaps, there is no issue today that carries with it as much controversy as does “FVA”. | BENEFITS AND CHALLENGES OF FAIR VALUE ACCOUNTING INTRODUCTION I do not think any topic in accounting has gathered as much interest as has the subject of “Fair Value Accounting” “FVA”. Heightened by the financial crisis of recent years “FVA” has received enormous attention by both academia and the business community alike. Rarely do “conspiracy theorists” make their way into the humdrum subject matter of accounting, but when it comes to the issue of “FVA” accounting, almost anything and everything has been postulated. The most widely held belief is that the move to “FVA” is to blame for the financial crisis of 2007. (Sorkin, 2008.) I have evaluated “FVA” and the transition from “historical value accounting “HVA”. In particular, I have researched the evolution within the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) as it pertains to “FVA”. I have also reviewed the move toward the establishment of one set of standards for worldwide accounting as evidenced by the “convergence” project. With that in mind, we only need to look to the International Accounting Standards Board and its IFRS to get a...

Words: 2522 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Fair Value Accounting

...Questions for Fair value accounting case 1. What is fair value accounting, what are its advantages and disadvantages 2. How is it different from historical cost accounting 3. What are level 1, 2, 3 assets 4. Give a simple example of level 1, 2, 3 assets 5. Suggest 3 ways to improve reporting fair value assets. ------------------------------------------------- QUESTION 1: Fair value accounting is method of accounting the value of assets, liabilities and shareholders’ equity in rational and unbiased manner by taking into consideration several objective and subjective factors. The objective factors include but are not limited to acquisition/ production/ distribution costs, replacement costs, or costs of close substitutes, actual utility at a given level of development of social productive capability supply versus demand. Certain subjective factors include risk characteristics, cost of and return on capital, perceived utility, etc. Advantages of fair value accounting: 1. Timeliness: The valuation reflects the most up-to-date and market value as of reporting date. The impact of fair value measurements—whether positive or negative on a company—is the result of market forces. 2. Transparency: Investors benefit when companies disclose their views on the impact of market illiquidity in their financial reporting. Investors and other users have greater insight into management’s views as to ultimate settlement amounts. 3. Relevancy: the valuation...

Words: 1011 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Fair Value Project Summary of Iasb and Fasb

...Project Summary Background The objective of this project is to provide guidance to entities on how they should measure the fair value of assets and liabilities when required by other Standards. This project will not change when fair value measurement is required by IFRSs. Discussion at the September 2005 IASB Meeting At the September 2005 meeting, the IASB added the Fair Value Measurements topic to its agenda. The aim of the project is to provide guidance to entities on how they should measure the fair value of assets and liabilities when required by other Standards. This project will not change when fair value measurement is required by IFRSs. Discussion at the November 2005 IASB Meeting The staff conducted an education session on the FASB's working draft of a final Statement on Fair Value Measurements. In addition, the staff reviewed the scope of FASB's Fair Value Measurements project as it relates to IFRSs and the issues and questions to be addressed in preparing an IASB Exposure Draft and related Invitation to Comment. No decisions were made. At a previous meeting, the Board decided to issue the FASB's final Statement on Fair Value Measurements as an IASB Exposure Draft with an Invitation to Comment. The appendices in the FASB document dealing with consequential amendments and references to US GAAP pronouncements will be replaced with proposed consequential amendments and references to IFRSs. The Board further decided that there should be limited changes to the FASB's...

Words: 21364 - Pages: 86

Premium Essay

Fair Value

...the amounts paid/ received at acquisition Problem: +) inflation, +) increase in asset values are not reflected in financial statements (wearing out of assets, increase in market value) Advantage: +) objective method: documentary evidence to prove the purchase price of an asset, or amounts paid as expense. +) costs can easily be verified. * Alternative method of accounting that have been developed to address the problem: Measurement of the elements of financial statements: measurement options rather than historical cost include: +) replacement cost/ current value: means the amount need to replace an item with an identical item. Ex: XY Co purchased a machine five years ago for $15 000. It is now worn out and needs replacing. An identical machine can be purchased for $20 000. Historical cost is $15 000 Replacement cost is $20 000 +) net realisable value: is the expected price less any costs still to be incurred in getting the item ready for sale and then selling it. Ex: XY Co's machine from the example above can be restored to working order at a cost of $5 000. It can then be sold for $10 000. What is its net realisable value? Net realisable value = $10 000 – $5 000 = $5 000 +) deprival value: is the loss which a business entity would suffer if it were deprived of the use of the asset. Value to the business, or deprival value, can be any of the following values: (a) Replacement cost: in the case of non-current assets, it is assumed that the replacement...

Words: 2000 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Fair Value

...Case analysis: Classification of instruments in fair value hierarchy Instrumental 1 In the case, there was a significant decrease in the volume and activity for the instrument because of (1) significant widening of the bid-ask spreads in the markets and the widening continued throughout Q4 2012 (2) a significant decrease in the volume of trades comparing with historical level in Q4 (3) no recent transactions. According to 820-10-35-54-c, it was reasonable to determine that market is not active. Because the adjustments were based on management’s assumption, FFC didn’t used level 1 inputs in the income approach valuation technique (present value technique). In addition, significant adjustment inputs includes credit adjustment (level 3 inputs) and liquidity risk adjustment (level 3 inputs), and implied rate of return (level 2 inputs) under ASC 820-10-35-48/52. According to ASC 820-10-35-37A, when the inputs are categorized within different levels of the hierarchy, the entire instrument should be in the same level of hierarchy as the lowest level inputs that is significant to the entire measurement. So, CDO should be categorized within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Instrument 2 There was no significant decrease in the volume and activity for the MBS, because no significant factors occurred. Therefore, the market should be still active, even the market became increasingly volatile with some declined activity in the Q4 2012. In my opinion, FFC should still use market approach...

Words: 775 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Trade Off Between Fair Value Accounting and Historical Cost Accounting

...3. Trade off between fair value accounting and historical cost accounting a) Relevance: Financial information is relevant when it influences the economic decisions of users, Fair value reporting is more relevant as it will allow users of financial statements to obtain a truer and fairer view of the company's real financial situation since it reflects the prevailing economic conditions and the changes in them. In contrast, historical cost accounting shows the conditions that existed when the transaction took place and any possible changes in the price do not appear until the asset is realized. b) Reliability: This relates to the degree of assurance capable of being obtained through verification that information faithfully represents what it purports to represent. Historical cost is considered more reliable as fair value requires estimations. FASB has expand the disclosures and framework for all companies to enhance the reliability of fair value accounting. However the drawbacks of the FV accounting is still holds as many of the valuations incorporates many subjective input data and assumptions. c) Decision usefulness: In general, financial information is considered to be useful if it enhances one's ability to make investment and credit decisions. (i) For investors: Investors will need to broaden their knowledge of fair value measurement methodologies to effectively analyze a company's financial statements and make a sound comparison. Given that institutions may use different...

Words: 449 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Fair Value

...the rapid development of economy in our country, the fair value measurement model will play a more and more important role in the accounting application. At the same time, along with a conceptual change in investment, the investment real estate also becomes a new economic growth point in China. Therefore, exploring the accounting application status of fair value in the investment real estate, finding existing problems and putting forward suggestions for improvement, both in academic and practice,is of great significance. This paper firstly compared the differences between the fair value model and the cost value model of investment real estate in our country, and then posed a contrast of investment real estate principle between our country and the international standard, the application status of investment real estate fair value measurement model in our country was also analyzed, driving to the conclusion that enterprises of our country seldom adopt the fair value pattern to measure their investment real estate, and the manner to determine the fair value was not unified. This paper also touched upon the empirical study of how the market (investors) respond to variation in the investment real estate fair value measurement, which found that changes in fair value recognized in profit or loss had a negative effect on share price, while net asset value per share played a opposite role; and investors’ react to changes in the fair value of the investment real estate conversion was not sensitive...

Words: 266 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Fair Value Accounting Under Financial Crisis

...June 2010, Vol.6, No.6 (Serial No.61) Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, ISSN 1548-6583, USA Fair value accounting under financial crisis HE Cai-xia1, ZHANG Chi2 (1. School of Accounting, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, China; 2. School of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430073, China) Abstract: The recent financial crisis has led to a vigorous debate about the pros and cons of fair-value accounting (FVA). This debate presents a major challenge for FVA going forward and standard setters’ push to extend FVA into other areas. In this article, we highlight three important issues as an attempt to make sense of the debate. First, much of the controversy results from confusion about what is new and different about FVA. Second, while there are legitimate concerns about marking to market (or pure FVA) in times of financial crisis, it is less clear that these problems apply to FVA as stipulated by the accounting standards, be it IFRS or U.S. GAAP. Third, historical cost accounting (HCA) is unlikely to be the remedy. There are a number of concerns about HCA as well and these problems could be larger than those with FVA. Key words: fair value accounting; historical cost accounting; financial crisis 1. Introduction The recent financial crisis has turned the spotlight on fair-value accounting (FVA) and led to a major policy debate involving among others the U.S. Congress, the European Commission as well banking...

Words: 2462 - Pages: 10