Premium Essay

Federalist or Antifederalist

In: Other Topics

Submitted By martinezkyli
Words 382
Pages 2
Choose whether to argue as a Federalist or as an Anti-Federalist. Review the lesson to make sure you understand their main points.
Using quotes from the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers, write an opinion article for a newspaper, or create a speech podcast to convince people in your state to agree with your position. Include the following in your speech or article: teens shaking hands after playing a game of tennis
© 2012 Polka Dot/Thinkstock introductory paragraph that clearly states your position as a Federalist or Anti-Federalist at least two paragraphs describing differences between the Federalist and Anti-Federalist points of view. Use at least two quotes from each of the Federalist Papers and Anti-Federalist Papers.

If you would like to explore more of the Federalist Papers and Anti-Federalist Papers to find your own quotes, these sites will be helpful.

Federalist Papers
American Studies at the University of Virginia
The Avalon Project at Yale Law School
The Law Center at the University of Oklahoma

Anti-Federalist Papers
Document Library by Teaching American History at least one paragraph to explain why you disagree with the opposing stance. For example, if you have chosen to argue as a Federalist, you will explain why you disagree with the Anti-Federalist position, using quotes from the documents to support your argument. strong concluding paragraph that summarizes your argument and encourage others to support you
Your argument should be created in a formal style. One important element of formal writing is using third person point-of-view. The sentence "I believe that the Federalist's structure of government" is written from first person point-of-view because it uses the pronoun "I." The sentence "The Federalist's structure of government" is written from third person point-of-view. In formal writing, use third person point-of-view.…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

2.03 Federalist vs Antifederalist

...If you were to ask me whether I sided with the anti-federalist or the federalist, you might be surprised at what I would say. Maybe not for the reasons you think. In my opinion, I side with the federalist. I’m all for order and I don’t like change so much but to make a country better you need to change some things. Things will constantly be changing and that is fine. A strong central government is very important. The federalist wanted to see a change to improve the country as a whole whereas the anti-federalist wanted to keep the monarchy ways. The anti-federalist and federalist had different views as to how a country should be ran. Both did have ideas to help the country and make it better. Federalist wanted a central federal government, a central bank, and an army. They cared about the governed and not just the ones who govern. In federalist paper no. 39 it says “It is essential to such a government that it be derived from the great body of the society, not from and inconsiderable proportion or a favored class of it; otherwise a handful of tyrannical nobles, exercising their oppression by a delegation of their powers, might aspire to the rank of republicans and claims for their government and honorable title of republic.” Not only did the federalist care about giving too much power to the important people, they also wanted to have control of the government. It states this in federalist paper no. 59: “It is evident that each department should have a will of its own and......

Words: 545 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Arguments and Opposition to the Constitution

...constitution called themselves Federalists, and those against it became known as Antifederalists. Federalists promoted the notion of a strong central government that could keep a national military, place tariffs and tax the people, and uphold laws. They believed their new constitution would strengthen the country and solve its existing problems, readying the nation in case of hostilities against stronger countries. Antifederalists believed that the new constitution would induce a tyrannical government. They argued that the nation had just escaped the unfair rule of England, and did not need a highly centralized government that ignored the needs and took away the freedom of the people. They would not agree to ratify such a proposal unless a Bill of Rights was crafted to limit Congress’s powers and protect the rights of the citizens. Those in favor of the Constitution proposal argued that there must be a prime leader to run things smoothly. They agreed that the leader would not hold too much power, and that his decisions would be in favor of the people. In his paper The Federalist, James Madison advocates the idea of a centralized government. “Extend the sphere,” he writes, “and you take in a greater variety of parties and interests.” The Federalists designed the Constitution so there were no constraints on the ability of the central government to use its military power and its fiscal powers, its taxing and borrowing authority. According to the Federalists, the government's......

Words: 985 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Texas Govt Ch 2

...Chapter 2 Chapter 2 begins with the description of The Tea Part’s efforts to limit government activity through the use of the constitution. Tea Party members believe that federally funded programs like social security and Medicaid are unconstitutional because they are not permitted by the Constitution. Opponents argued that the Constitution was created to a strong central government. The book gives us this example to illustrate a similar argument between the Federalist and the Antifederalist over the documents ratification as well as many other disputes. The book acknowledges how enduring the constitution has been due to the way it was written. It is extremely general in its language for adaptation and changes. The historical context of the Constitution The book states the first time many colonist questioned British rule was the Stamp Act of 1765. The king imposed tax on many publications and legal documents to help pay for the French and Indian War (1754-1763) claiming that colonists were benefitting from British protection so the tax was fair. Colonist argued otherwise saying that they had no representation in legislation in the British Parliament. After political solutions failed the Continental Congress declared independence from Britain on July 4, 1776. The heavy task of creating a lasting republic was difficult. Post- Revolution the founder’s first attempt limited the government too much in the Articles of Confederation. A small group of leaders agreed......

Words: 888 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Independence

...not or would not support the government with the necessary revenue it would need to operate. The government found it increasingly difficult to pay off debts that had been accumulating since the revolution. Congress became largely ignored by the states because of its inabilities to carry out its duties. When George Washington called for a convention in late May of 1787, delegates from eleven of the thirteen states attended. The congressional delegates were comprised of what were called Federalists and Antifederalists. Federalists felt that the Articles of Confederation were weak and ineffective. They supported the need for a strong central government and a new Constitution. The Antifederalist, however, favored the Articles of Confederation and believed a strong central government would pose a threat to America’s liberties and rights. These were often the poorer class of society including poor, uneducated and or illiterate working-class farmers and laborers. The Antifederalists felt the need for a bill of rights to be added to the Constitution for fear that the states would have their bills of rights overridden. Although the initial intent of the convention was to review and update the Articles of Confederation, the decision was made to create a new constitution that better addressed the concerns the Articles overlooked. Out of this convention the U.S. Constitution was born. They decided on a government that consisted of three branches: The Legislative......

Words: 1305 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

World War 1 Short Essay

... which has served as "the Supreme Law of the Land" for more than two centuries, is the world's oldest written constitution still in use (Bloom, 1987). The United States Constitution is a foundation of basic laws and principles that defines the rights of American and sets limits on what the government can and cannot do. It provides the framework for the National government and establishes a system by which responsibilities are divided between the national government and the states' governments. The first Constitution was the Articles of the Confederation. In this essay I will compare the Articles of Confederation with the Constitution, analyze the drafting of the Constitution, and compare the debate over ratification between Federalist and ant-Federalist. The Articles of Confederation, which were ratified in 1781, providing the first form of a national government in the United States. When the United States won its independence from England in 1781, a majority of Americans felt a stronger allegiance to their individual states than to their new country. Most people did not wish to create a strong national government, over which they felt they would have little or no control. The Articles gave each state a great deal of independence and represented little more than a “league of friendship” between the states. The primary purpose of the Articles was to establish a system by which the states could co-operate if they needed to defend themselves against a foreign enemy.......

Words: 853 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Confederation and Constitution

...in place. The Articles of Confederation led to the Constitution of the United States. Although similar in some aspects, very different in others. The articles had many weaknesses that were changed in the Constitution. There were many compromises made between the states in order to effectively draft the Constitution. Roger Sherman’s Plan kept the Constitutional Convention together which was later known as the Great Compromise. The fight for the Constitution had just begun and the ratification processes needed to take place. Even with some states being in favor of the Constitution it would take time to get the nine states needed to complete this process. The states in favor would called themselves The Federalist and those opposed were called the Anti-Federalist. The Federalist set out to change the mind of the remaining states with a series of letters that were written to newspapers. The Articles of Confederation were used as a base for the Constitution. The ideas from the Articles of Confederation were used in the writing of the Constitution. Both the Articles and the Constitution established “federal” systems of multiple sovereigns whose continued existence was constitutionally guaranteed. Despite the fact that both the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution established federal systems, there were certain fundamental differences between the two systems. The Articles of Confederation gave states the power of federal government whereas the Constitution derived its......

Words: 1610 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Government

...Anti-Federalists vs. the Federalists - what did we gain from their discourse?  Federalists are people who wanted their national government become stronger. They supported the ratification of the Constitution to help conduct the debt and tensions following the American Revolution. They felt that many individual and monetary policies make economic struggles and national weakness. They prefer to have central banking central financial policies. Contract to Federalists, anti- Federalists who oppose the development of a strong federal government and the Constitution ratified in 1788 wanted to remain in the hands of the state and local levels. They felt that states were free agents that should manage their income and spend their money as they saw fitly. Although less well organized than the federal, they also have an impressive group of leaders who are particularly prominent in state politics. Was the Constitution in danger of NOT being ratified?  Yes, the constitution was in danger of not being ratified. The strongest objections raised by the Antifederalists, however, the main problem is the lack of protection for individual liberties in the Constitution. The debate raged for months. Nine states had ratified the Constitution, ensuring it will be in effect for the nine states. However, the main countries including the Virginia and New York were not approved. Its was very difficult in ratifying Constitution. What might our country have been like without the Ant-Federalist......

Words: 277 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Public Relation Timeline

...PR History…The American Experience The field of public relations sure has evolved! Review the public relations timeline below, then seek more information from the text and the web to fill in the blanks and explanations. Early American Period -Founding of the Republic -Use of public opinion, managed communications and persuasion   Early American Experience -Sam Adams – Committees of Correspondence to distribute the news -Staged Events – Boston Tea Party -Thomas Paine – wrote persuasive pamphlets   The Federalists Papers -Letters to newspapers 1787-88 by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay -Pressure group PR campaign to gain acceptance for the Constitution -Used accurate facts and sound ideas -“History’s finest public relations job.” –Allen Nevins   Antifederalists -Letters in newspapers criticizing new constitution, urging against ratification -Concession for Bill of Rights -Negative name -Antifederalists went away -Federalists became a party.   Early PR Men in America – 1800s -John Beckley for Thomas Jefferson -Amos Kendall for Andrew Jackson. Kendall was first press secretary -Mathew St. Clair for Davy Crockett   Robber Barons and the Muckrakers -Adversarial PR & Press Relations -Press Agentry:  Provocative act to get publicity and draw attention toward an idea or grievance (P.R. Barnum, 1830s) -First corporate PR department established by George Westinghouse -First publicity agency: The Publicity Bureau, Boston,......

Words: 500 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

The Federalist Papers

...Prof. Gillooly  03/06/2015  The Significance of the Federalist Papers  The Federalist Papers, is a compilation of 85 articles, advocating the ratification of the  proposed Constitution of the United States. These series of articles were published by Alexander  Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay between October 1787 and May 1788. The overall  intention of the Federalist Papers was to explain the advantages of the proposed Constitution  over the prevailing Articles of Confederation. The Federalist Papers impacted the ratification of  the Constitution by making some of their most important objections, including the significance  of having a Constitution, acknowledging to the disagreements made by the Antifederalists, and  defending conflicting arguments made against the attributes of the executive and judicial branch  as specified in the proposed Constitution.   Before the ratification of the Constitution, the central government under the Articles of  Confederations was very weak and in jeopardy of falling apart. Alexander Hamilton, James  Madison, and John Jay, who were Federalists believed as well that the Articles of Confederation  was too weak to maintain a powerful central government and needed to be restored by the U.S  Constitution. The fundamental goal of the U.S constitution was to secure the rights of the U.S  citizens and for the federal government to strive for the common good of the individuals. The ......

Words: 1423 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

2.03 Antifederals Assessment

...Hannah Carr United States Government March 18, 2015 Horton 2.03 The Antifederalist Assessment So I have chosen to use Federalists because our government is strong and it is beneficial to our country, the federalists wanted a change in the government, while the Anti-Federalists wanted a monarchy. The Anti-Federalists way would have led our country to corruption. The federalists covered the worries of the people and the corruption of the government while adding in people opinions. Anti-Federalists refer to a coalition of people that opposed the creation of the Constitution that would lead to a stronger U.S. federal government. They believed that the greatest threat to the future of the United States would be because of the governments growing power. The previous constitution, known as the Articles of Confederation, gave the states more authority. “Rouse up, my friends, a matter of infinite importance is before you on the carpet, soon to be decided in your convention: The New Constitution. Seize the happy moment. Secure to yourselves and your posterity the jewel Liberty, which has cost you so much blood and treasure, by a well regulated Bill of Rights, from the encroachments of men in power.“ The group of supporters that wanted to put the Constitution into place were known as the Federalists, they got their name from the term “federalism” which implies a strong central government. Federalism is a system based upon democratic rules in which the power to govern is shared......

Words: 306 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Module 2.03 Us History

...2.03 When choosing your position to be Federalist or Antifederalist, the best choice would be a Federalist. In being a Federalist, they agree on having a strong central government, under the Constitution. Unlike the anti-federalist how don’t agree with that. Anti- Federalists “As long as we can preserve our unalienable rights, we are in safety. “ Federalist "A pure democracy can admit no cure for the mischiefs of faction. A common passion or interest will be felt by a majority, and there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party. Hence it is, that democracies have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have, in general, been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths." These 2 quotes have the idea of security and safety. Being a federalist and under the Constitution, it is like choosing the stronger more central government. Which therefore will be the one to protect more efficiently. The anti-federalists where mostly farmer and workers when the federalists is everyone how is much bigger than them. They believed the Constitution made the nation too strong and took too much control over the individual states. Being strong is a good thing. We need control because without control there will be chaos. We wouldn’t be living the life were living right now without this protection and control. I disagree with the anti-federalist because I’m all about having a strong nation. I......

Words: 293 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Antifed

...2.03 The Antifederalist Assessment So I have chosen to use Federalists because our government is strong and it is beneficial to our country, the federalists wanted a change in the government, while the Anti-Federalists wanted a monarchy. The Anti-Federalists way would have led our country to corruption. The federalists covered the worries of the people and the corruption of the government while adding in people opinions. Anti-Federalists refer to a coalition of people that opposed the creation of the Constitution that would lead to a stronger U.S. federal government. They believed that the greatest threat to the future of the United States would be because of the governments growing power. The previous constitution, known as the Articles of Confederation, gave the states more authority. “Rouse up, my friends, a matter of infinite importance is before you on the carpet, soon to be decided in your convention: The New Constitution. Seize the happy moment. Secure to yourselves and your posterity the jewel Liberty, which has cost you so much blood and treasure, by a well regulated Bill of Rights, from the encroachments of men in power.“ The group of supporters that wanted to put the Constitution into place were known as the Federalists, they got their name from the term “federalism” which implies a strong central government. Federalism is a system based upon democratic rules in which the power to govern is shared between the state and national governments, creating a......

Words: 297 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Federalism Paper

...feared that this was unachievable. The constitution has helped create and mold the United States government into what it is today but it also got help from a few other very important documents. The federalist and the anti-federalist were two completely different groups of people who wanted two completely different things to happen that pertained to the constitution. He anti-federalist were completely against the reification of the constitution which without that would have not transformed our nation as it did. The federalist had the right idea that with the ratification of the constitution it would give just as much power to the government if it wasn’t ratified. “The most productive system of finance will always be the least burdensome.” The Federalist Papers are considered by many to be among the founding classics of American political thought, along with the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights. The Federalist Papers were part of the national debate over the ratification of the Constitution. Opponents of the Constitution thought the document gave the national government too much power at the expense of the states—especially the power to tax and make war—privileged landholding aristocrats, and created a virtual monarch in the presidency. The Federalist Papers attempted to alleviate these fears, explaining the necessity of the Constitution and a strong central government to provide “political prosperity.” “Every man who loves peace, every......

Words: 722 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Confederation and Constitution

...British and Spanish abuse because it could not pay for an army when the states would not contribute the necessary funds. The country would not get rich as a whole because states controlled all interstate commerce. States coined their own money and regulated its supply, so values of currency varied from state to state.  Many of the delegates were in favor of the Articles of Confederation. These delegates were called Antifederalists. They believed that a strong central government was a threat to American liberties and rights. Usually they were states' rights advocates, backcountry farmers, poor farmers, the ill-educated and illiterate, debtors, and paper-money advocates. In general, the poorer classes of society. Most of the Antifederalists thought that the Constitution required a bill of rights. State governments already had bills of rights but the antifederalists were afraid that they might be overridden by the Constitution. On the opposing side, there were the Federalists. Federalists were supporters of the Constitution that desired a strong central government. Federalists felt that the Articles of Confederation were weak and ineffective. They felt that National government would protect the rights of the people.  While their inexperienced ideas at creating a new republican government were practiced, the articles proved to be very weak. George Washington called for a convention in late May 1787; in order speak about the nation’s political and economical problems and revise......

Words: 1427 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Historical Essay 1 - Confederation and Constitution

...Alexander Hamilton, writing as “Publius” in The Federalist No. 68, notes “that if the manner of it be not perfect, it is at least excellent” (Constitutional Society 1998). However, the institution of the Electoral College really was designed to ensure that the office was unaffected by political bodies like Congress and “to dampen the ill effects of an uninformed populace” (Berheide 2001). The American political landscape at the time still had deep reservations around creating a governing body that resembled the British style of rule. While the constitution had safe guards against these issues there still remained a deep divide around the issue when the constitution was drafted. The group becomes known as the Anti-Federalists and they had a couple of positions. One segment “sought to leave intact the government under the Articles of Confederation” (Anti-federalists 2010) while another felt the constitution gave the national government too much power. The Federalists, on the other hand, supported the ratification of the constitution and were instrumental in its drafting. The Federalists help create “the federal judiciary and the territorial system, introduced excise laws, a US bank, a protective tariff system and bounty system to develop industry and 5   Historical Essay: Confederation and Constitution agriculture, and a postal system” (Federalist 2014). As a group they tended to be more urban and educated where the anti-federalists were comprised of backcountry farmers,......

Words: 1571 - Pages: 7