Premium Essay

Federalist or Antifederalist

In: Other Topics

Submitted By martinezkyli
Words 382
Pages 2
Choose whether to argue as a Federalist or as an Anti-Federalist. Review the lesson to make sure you understand their main points.
Using quotes from the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers, write an opinion article for a newspaper, or create a speech podcast to convince people in your state to agree with your position. Include the following in your speech or article: teens shaking hands after playing a game of tennis
© 2012 Polka Dot/Thinkstock introductory paragraph that clearly states your position as a Federalist or Anti-Federalist at least two paragraphs describing differences between the Federalist and Anti-Federalist points of view. Use at least two quotes from each of the Federalist Papers and Anti-Federalist Papers.

If you would like to explore more of the Federalist Papers and Anti-Federalist Papers to find your own quotes, these sites will be helpful.

Federalist Papers
American Studies at the University of Virginia
The Avalon Project at Yale Law School
The Law Center at the University of Oklahoma

Anti-Federalist Papers
Document Library by Teaching American History at least one paragraph to explain why you disagree with the opposing stance. For example, if you have chosen to argue as a Federalist, you will explain why you disagree with the Anti-Federalist position, using quotes from the documents to support your argument. strong concluding paragraph that summarizes your argument and encourage others to support you
Your argument should be created in a formal style. One important element of formal writing is using third person point-of-view. The sentence "I believe that the Federalist's structure of government" is written from first person point-of-view because it uses the pronoun "I." The sentence "The Federalist's structure of government" is written from third person point-of-view. In formal writing, use third person point-of-view....

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Antifederalists Vs Federalists

...about the making of the government of the United States of America. We studied the Articles of Confederation, Constitution, Antifederalists and Federalists. After the Revolutionary War, the colonies were faced with another problem; how were they supposed to rule their country? The states decided to each write constitutions describing the state’s rules(“State…”). The Continental Congress still met and in 1777, decided that they needed a central ruling system(“Articles…”). They loosely tied the state constitutions together in a document titled the Articles of Confederation(“Articles…”). In this document, the power rested within the state governments and there was one vote per state(Articles...). The Articles of Confederation operated with a unicameral government, with no executive or judicial positions(Articles...). The Continental Congress couldn’t make the states give money and resources for the army, only request them(Articles...). The Congress realized that...

Words: 481 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Federalists Vs Antifederalist Analysis

...What is the most efficient use of power? A strong central government, where little to no power goes to the people, or one where all the power goes to the people and very little power goes to the government? For most people the first option is their own personal nightmares whereas the latter is their ideal. The Federalists wanted to have a system of power where most power went to the government and was favorable by the wealthy, well educated men. The Anti-Federalists were in favor of a system of power where most power went to the people. This option was favorable by farmers. The Antifederalists appealed to the ordinary man, whereas the Federalists appealed to the 1% of the population that owned land. The thought process of the Antifederalists...

Words: 365 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

2.03 Federalist vs Antifederalist

...If you were to ask me whether I sided with the anti-federalist or the federalist, you might be surprised at what I would say. Maybe not for the reasons you think. In my opinion, I side with the federalist. I’m all for order and I don’t like change so much but to make a country better you need to change some things. Things will constantly be changing and that is fine. A strong central government is very important. The federalist wanted to see a change to improve the country as a whole whereas the anti-federalist wanted to keep the monarchy ways. The anti-federalist and federalist had different views as to how a country should be ran. Both did have ideas to help the country and make it better. Federalist wanted a central federal government, a central bank, and an army. They cared about the governed and not just the ones who govern. In federalist paper no. 39 it says “It is essential to such a government that it be derived from the great body of the society, not from and inconsiderable proportion or a favored class of it; otherwise a handful of tyrannical nobles, exercising their oppression by a delegation of their powers, might aspire to the rank of republicans and claims for their government and honorable title of republic.” Not only did the federalist care about giving too much power to the important people, they also wanted to have control of the government. It states this in federalist paper no. 59: “It is evident that each department should have a will of its own and......

Words: 545 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Compare And Contrast The Federalist And Anti-Federalists

...most people the first option is their own personal nightmares whereas the latter is their ideal. The Federalists want to have a system of power where most power goes to the government and is favorable by the wealthy, well-educated men. The Anti-Federalists are in favor of a system of power where most power goes to the people. This option is favored by farmers. The Antifederalists appeals to the ordinary man, whereas the Federalists appeals to the 1% of the population that own land. The thought process of the Antifederalists appeal more to the common colonist. First, the Antifederalists want to not ratify the Constitution, but rather dd a Bill Of Rights. Led by the greatest colonist minds of Patrick Henry, Richard Henry Lee, George Mason, and Samuel Adams, and James Winthrop, son of John Winthrop (Antifederalists). The anti-federalists want a Bill of Rights to protect the rights of the people and oppose the ratification of the Constitution. The Bill of Rights are a list of rights that they believe should be accessible to everyone, however rich or poor they were....

Words: 561 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Difference Between Federalist And Anti-Federalists

...Introduction In us history the antifederalist were those who oppose with the constitution in 1788 and the federalist were those who want the constitution because they want to give freedom to the people. The debate happen because the federalist wanted the constitution but the antifederalist didn’t want. For make this happen both need to convince New York. The both teams started to send letters to New York trying to convince it. Federalists and Anti-Federalists were the staunchest opposition politicians during the drafting of the United States Constitution. They argued and disagreed on the legacy of the American Revolution nor in how exactly should the US government be established. The two groups discussed the merits of the Constitution for three years, between 1787 and 1790, during which time the colonies debated ratification. The Federalists finally got their Constitution was ratified by 13 states, while Rhode Island became the last state to ratify the May 29, 1790....

Words: 376 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Arguments and Opposition to the Constitution

...nation had been founded to escape the practice of having a single leader. However, it was generally admitted that the Articles of Confederation were a failure because the people had too much voice. The national government could not impose or collect taxes, and they could not forcibly uphold the law to any state. The problem that needed to be overcome was whether the separate states would cast aside their provinciality and become a single body under the federal structure. Those supporting the ratification of the constitution called themselves Federalists, and those against it became known as Antifederalists. Federalists promoted the notion of a strong central government that could keep a national military, place tariffs and tax the people, and uphold laws. They believed their new constitution would strengthen the country and solve its existing problems, readying the nation in case of hostilities against stronger countries. Antifederalists believed that the new constitution would induce a tyrannical government....

Words: 985 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Articles Of Confederation Dbq

...What type of government did the Federalists intend on creating? What type of government did the Antifederalists intend on creating? What was the major disagreement between the two factions? The Federalists intended on creating a stronger national government while the Antifederalists intended on creating a weaker national government. The Federalists supported the ratification of the Constitution while the Antifederalists didn’t until the Bill of Rights was added because they felt a powerful central government would threaten the liberties of citizens. 6. What are some criticisms of the separation of powers? Some criticisms of the separation of powers would be that it creates a stalemate when making policies, makes it harder to make decisions quickly and effectively in an emergency, and hurts our global leadership position. 7. Which concepts of government introduced in the Articles of Confederation were maintained in the Constitution? The concept of having a legislative branch persisted and Congress retained its ability to make peace, coin money, run the post office, and control the army. 8. What was the purpose of the Federalists papers? What are the two most important articles and who wrote...

Words: 573 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Anti Federalism Dbq

...The Antifederalist were not for the ratification of the constitution. They believed that the government could be easily corrupted. They were big believer of restraining government power. They were against the federalist papers because they had a lack of protection for individual freedoms. They wrote their own essays such as the “Centinel” against the federalist papers and it was to warn about the danger from tyranny. Samuel Bryan, the author of the letters of centinel, wrote: ‘Without presuming upon my own judgment, I cannot think in an unwarrantable presumption to offer my private opinion, and call upon others for their’s…” The Centinel purpose was to include a bill of rights in the new constitution and to adopt those rights. The Antifederalist achieve their goal and the federalists compromise with the bill of rights added to the Constitution. Many people say that the first amendment would not be here without the “intent of the Framers.”. But they did not adopt the first amendment. The Anti-federalist was still scared because the constitution did not really guarantee that the government could take people’s right to worship away. For example, the first amendment does not say that freedoms of speech or press shall not curtail, it only prevents...

Words: 651 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Texas Govt Ch 2

...Chapter 2 Chapter 2 begins with the description of The Tea Part’s efforts to limit government activity through the use of the constitution. Tea Party members believe that federally funded programs like social security and Medicaid are unconstitutional because they are not permitted by the Constitution. Opponents argued that the Constitution was created to a strong central government. The book gives us this example to illustrate a similar argument between the Federalist and the Antifederalist over the documents ratification as well as many other disputes. The book acknowledges how enduring the constitution has been due to the way it was written. It is extremely general in its language for adaptation and changes. The historical context of the Constitution The book states the first time many colonist questioned British rule was the Stamp Act of 1765. The king imposed tax on many publications and legal documents to help pay for the French and Indian War (1754-1763) claiming that colonists were benefitting from British protection so the tax was fair. Colonist argued otherwise saying that they had no representation in legislation in the British Parliament. After political solutions failed the Continental Congress declared independence from Britain on July 4, 1776. The heavy task of creating a lasting republic was difficult. Post- Revolution the founder’s first attempt limited the government too much in the Articles of Confederation. A small group of leaders agreed......

Words: 888 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The Importance Of Ratification Of The US Constitution

...Two sides formed during the debate on whether to ratify the U.S. Constitution or not; those who understood the necessity of a national government and those who feared another tyrannical central government. After leaving British rule, the colonists were fearful of another dictatorship and unrepresentative government. Because of this, they created the Articles of Confederation. However, the structure failed to provide the national government enough authority to successfully govern all thirteen states, because none of the state's trusted it. A group called Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Adams supported ratification of the Constitution. The Constitution would replace the weak Articles and enforce a stronger national...

Words: 362 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Advantages Of The Articles Of Confederation

...government more power to govern over the people, just like the federalist wanted, but the anti federalists wanted the state to keep their power and be separate. The Constitution outlined the specifics of the federal and state powers to make sure that the states are kept in line and that the federal government has the proper power. The Constitution was and still is the best way to govern the United States of America. The Articles of Confederation were the document that was created to help govern the newly formed states that broke away from the British rule. The Articles of Confederation had many weaknesses. It had no...

Words: 607 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Similarities Between The Articles Of Confederation And The Constitution

...sides, the people against the new Constitution the Anti-Federalist and the people for the new Constitution the Federalist. The Anti-Federalist believed that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government and thought that the states and local government needed the power so that it represented the average citizen. The court system was also discussed in the same manner, stating that the federal court system had too much power and that the states and local governments could handle the issues that arise (Gray, Ritter & Graham.) Major Antifederalists were John Hancock and Sam Adams who were very vocal about being against the Constitution. Hancock wanted to ensure that the government had no control over the basic human rights and it wasn’t until he was satisfied that these amendments were going to be added that he changed his view point on the constitution. These amendments that he requested is what known as the Bill of Rights today. The Federalist who were in favor of the Constitution becoming law, thought that without it the nation would not survive and would crumble. They felt that the Articles of confederation failed the nation as a whole and that America needed a stronger national government. The Federalist had to go against the Anti-Federalist who though the Constitution would only take the power away from the citizens and would eventually lead to a different type of ruling instead of democracy. The Federalist proved this would not happen by showing them the......

Words: 1550 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay


...Articles of Confederation and the U.S. Constitution The Birth of a Nation Joseph J. Zarzycki United States History – 405 Aimee James June 1, 2014 At the end of the revolutionary war the free states of the Union desired some sort of control that would create a unified country. The first such control came from what was called the Articles of Confederation, essentially our first constitution. This document addressed many issues. How should power be divided between local and national governments? How should laws be made, and by whom? Who should be authorized to govern those laws? How could the government be designed to protect the individual rights of the citizens? The Articles of Confederation, as it turned out, were lacking in several key areas and would be considered a failure. After the shortcomings of the articles began to become apparent, the state delegates tried to revise them; but instead, constructed the Constitution. When creating the Articles of Confederation, thirteen states formed a Confederation referred to as the “League of Friendship” in order to find a solution for common problems and concerns. The Articles of Confederation created a loose Confederation of independent states that gave limited powers to the central government. Each state, regardless of population, would have one vote in the house of Congress. Members of the one-house Congress agreed that the new government should be a unicameral legislature, without an executive branch......

Words: 1305 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Explain The Argument On Whether Or Not To Ratifying The Constitution Ratify

...In the summer of 1788 the argument on whether or not to ratify the constitution was starting to intensify. The federalists were in favor of ratification. They believed in a strong central government that could act independent of the states and have their own taxation power in order to pay off debts. The Antifederalists were not in favor of the constitution because it reminded them too much of the British government they fought against in 1776. An Antifederalist named Melancton Smith argued that with the new constitution citizens would not be accurately represented. He mentions how the middle class has a better comprehension of what issues citizens are concerned about. The problem with the federalist view is that the strong central government...

Words: 296 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Confederation and Constitution place. The Articles of Confederation led to the Constitution of the United States. Although similar in some aspects, very different in others. The articles had many weaknesses that were changed in the Constitution. There were many compromises made between the states in order to effectively draft the Constitution. Roger Sherman’s Plan kept the Constitutional Convention together which was later known as the Great Compromise. The fight for the Constitution had just begun and the ratification processes needed to take place. Even with some states being in favor of the Constitution it would take time to get the nine states needed to complete this process. The states in favor would called themselves The Federalist and those opposed were called the Anti-Federalist. The Federalist set out to change the mind of the remaining states with a series of letters that were written to newspapers. The Articles of Confederation were used as a base for the Constitution. The ideas from the Articles of Confederation were used in the writing of the Constitution. Both the Articles and the Constitution established “federal” systems of multiple sovereigns whose continued existence was constitutionally guaranteed. Despite the fact that both the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution established federal systems, there were certain fundamental differences between the two systems. The Articles of Confederation gave states the power of federal government whereas the Constitution derived its......

Words: 1610 - Pages: 7