Free Essay

Feminism

In: Social Issues

Submitted By kochuraniabraham
Words 4288
Pages 18
In Search of Her: A Postcolonial/ Feminist Enquiry into the Identity of Indian Woman Kochurani Abraham

“The home was the principal site for expressing the spiritual quality of the nation’s culture and women must take the main responsibility of protecting and nurturing this quality. No matter what the changes in the external conditions of life for women, they must not lose their essentially spiritual (ie feminine) virtues; they must not, in other words, become essentially westernized.” - Partha Chatterjee, “The Nationalist Resolution of the Women’s Question”*
“What was gradually and carefully constituted, brick by brick, in the interaction between colonialism and nationalism is now so deeply embedded in the consciousness of the middle classes that ideas about the past have assumed the status of revealed truths…It has led to a narrow and limiting circle in which the image of Indian womanhood has become, both a shackle and a rhetorical device that nevertheless functions as a historical truth.” - Uma Chakravarti “Whatever happened to the Vedic Dasi?: Orientalism, Nationalism and a Script for the Past.”*

Who/where is the Indian woman? Since this conference focuses on the theme “Identity, Difference and Conflict: Postcolonial Critique”, I think this question could well serve as a starter for our discussion on this issue from an Indian feminist perspective. In order to situate this question bringing into relief its complexities, I wish to begin this paper narrating an event recorded by Shobha De, a feminist writer and analyst. According to her report, a certain man in Orissa refused to take back his wife- the mother of his five children, after her three day trip to Delhi. She had gone to receive a special award for being a highly successful mushroom farmer, an honour she shared with 100 other farmers from across India. Her labourer husband doubted her character after the trip and remained adamant about his decision not to take her back home. The award winner is bewildered and apologetic, insisting that she had sought her husband’s permission to go to Delhi. Her mushroom cultivation has to be on hold until the poor woman is able to sort out the non-sense with her obstinate husband.

In this context, Shobha De raises the following questions: Will she say ‘to hell with you’ to the man who is questioning her character and go back to her mushrooms? Will her children be taken away from her? Will she be ostracized by her community or other villagers? Will she lapse into depression, stop farming and beg her husband’s forgiveness? Will a modern day version of ‘vanavas’ and agni pareeksha be forced upon her? This story raises many questions about the identity of Indian women within a post-colonial framework. If this woman from Orissa had to be present here with us and engage in a discourse about identity, difference and conflict, what would she say about her present situation? Who or what defines her identity and what are the implications of that identity for what she experiences as ‘difference’ in her life? How is she to address the conflict between the multiple identities of her person?

I do not attempt to give any answers, but I have more questions as I engage critically with the notions of identity, difference and conflict from the perspective of Indian women. It is said that ‘a woman’s mind is a colonized mind’ and I am afraid that it is very true of Indian women’s reality. Though I dislike generalizations, I am inclined to believe that there is some truth in this statement. Recently I was invited to a take a session on empowerment of women at a reputed women’s college in Kerala. One of the organizers, a college lecturer who is also pursuing her doctoral research met me before the session. During a casual chat, she opened up her thoughts about the program and mentioned that she was comfortable with the empowerment of women but she detested a feminist identity. On my query as to why this discomfort in spite of her being a woman lecturer in a women’s college, her reply was: “Better not to become a feminist. It will only create problems in life as one starts seeing everything with that lens.”

Indian feminist theorizing in the postcolonial framework basically attempts to decolonize the minds of Indian women. This is done through a critical engagement with the colonial ideology that is reflected in Indian patriarchy and by addressing the hegemonic codes of nationalism which emerged as a reactionary project to colonialism. The colonial discourse has served to reinforce the power structures and social hierarchies of Indian patriarchy and hence the task of decolonizing the mind is a slow and difficult process, all the more when it is inscribed also by religion. In this paper we shall first look into the association between feminism and post colonialism, then examine critically the role played by nationalism in the identity construction of Indian women and finally consider the feminist postcolonial engagement in deconstructing the defined identities in view of creating a liberative space where they can name or refuse to own what is defined as their identity.

Feminism and Postcolonialism

Feminist work is a constitutive part of postcolonial critique. However, it shares tense relations at times when feminists working out of different locations question the extent to which Western or ‘First World’ feminism is equipped to deal with the problems encountered by women in the once colonized countries. This problematic has implications also for the women living in Western societies with ancestral connections to the colonized countries like the migrants and their descendants. Nevertheless the affinity between the feminist and postcolonial discourse comes from identifying the deep-seated linkages between colonialism and patriarchy.

Colonialism and patriarchy are both systems which are founded on power relations that are repressive, which operate ideologically and in concrete ways. Edward Said’s description of the relationship between the Occident and the Orient in his classic work Orientalism, throws light on the parallelism between these two ideologies. Said points out that the relationship between the Occident and Orient is a relationship of power, of domination and various degrees of a complex hegemony. The Oriental is irrational, depraved (fallen), childlike, “different”, thus the European is rational, virtuous, mature, “normal” and what gave the Oriental’s world its intelligibility and identity was not the result of its own efforts but rather the whole complex series of knowledgeable manipulations by which the Orient was identified by the West.

All that we need to do is to substitute Occident/ Orient with the terms Man/Woman to understand how colonialism and patriarchy mirror the same politics. The configuration of power that underlie man-woman relationship in a patriarchal framework is marked by hegemony, and the positioning of man and woman on a domination-dependency/subordination continuum. Like colonialism, patriarchy exists in the midst of resistance to its authority. The similarity between these two oppressive ideologies is evident in the manner in which both assert certain representational systems that create an order of the world which is presented as “normal” or “true”.

The similarity between feminism and post-colonial theory is based on the fact that both discourses are predominantly political and concern themselves with the struggle against oppression and injustice. Moreover, both reject the established hierarchical, patriarchal system, which is dominated by the hegemonic white male, and vehemently deny the supposed supremacy of masculine power and authority. Imperialism, like patriarchy, is after all a phallocentric, supremacist ideology that subjugates and dominates its subjects. The oppressed woman is in this sense akin to the colonized subject. Essentially, as Nishant Shahani argues, the exponents of post-colonialism are reacting against colonialism in the political and economic sense while feminist theorists are rejecting colonialism of a sexual nature. It is crucial then, to address the ways in which these tyrannical ideologies have constructed the identity of the subjugated, and so, feminism cannot be seen in isolation from the postcolonial discourse.

Identity construction of Indian Woman in the Politics of Nationalism

It is important to examine at this juncture the role played by nationalism in constructing the identity of Indian woman, though Indian woman is not a homogenous entity but is marked by her positioning at the intersection of class and caste/religion with gender. Indian nationalism which emerged as a ‘corrective’ politics to counter the impact of colonialism and modernization, glorified India’s past and sought to defend everything traditional. As analysts observe, the nationalist ideology in its fight against the dominance of colonialism separated the domain of culture into two spheres: the material and the spiritual. The dominance of western civilization in the material sphere as apparent in its advances in the field of science and technology, its rational forms of economic organization and modern methods of statecraft, gave European countries the power to subjugate non-European peoples. To counter this, the nationalist agenda focused on the assertion of spiritual domain of the East taking it to be superior to the West. Along with the separation of the cultural domain into material and spiritual spheres, there was a separation of the social space into ghar and bahir, the home and the world, the world representing the material, and the home- the inner spiritual self, the true Indian identity.

It is within this framework that women became the site for the testing and reasserting of nationalistic tradition. The world taken to be a treacherous terrain of the pursuit of material interests got identified with the male and woman became the representation of the home which must remain unaffected by the profane activities of the material world. The main concern of the nationalist struggle was to protect, preserve and strengthen the inner core of the nationalist culture, its spiritual essence. The recovery of tradition and the recourse to the ancient Indian past became the new colonizing narrative by which women’s identity was constructed. Far from enjoying the benefits of postcolonial independence, women came to represent the newly formed private sphere that operated "as an indigenist alternative to western materialism." The split between the public and the private enabled nationalist discourse to establish neat oppositions between male and female, inner and outer, material and spiritual, and the new woman defined this way was subjected to a new patriarchy. As with all hegemonic forms of exercise of dominance, this patriarchy combined coercive authority with the subtle force of persuasion that even educated women became keen propagators of the nationalist idea of the ‘new woman’. Consequently, as Uma Chakravarti has rightly pointed out in the text cited earlier, what was gradually and carefully constituted, brick by brick, in the interaction between colonialism and nationalism got so deeply embedded in the consciousness of the Indian masses.

This can be illustrated by the manner in which women became active functionaries of Hindutva politics. With the rise of Hindutva in the early 90's, the Women's movement in India saw the need to adopt traditional icons like Kali and Shakti in order to assert an idea of authentic Indian womanhood. This made it extremely convenient for parochial political parties like the BJP and the Shiv Sena to co-opt this discourse of traditionalism and mobilize it for their parochial agendas. Seeing themselves as empowered Shakti incarnates, the Mahila Aghadi (the women's wing of the Shiv Sena party) played a significant role in the communal riots that followed the demolishing of the Babri Masjid. This communitarian logic was largely a result of a nativist framework in which some women saw themselves primarily as community upholders of tradition rather than as agents of change. These regressive forms of thinking pushed women in the direction of a primordial past, even if they ostensibly expressed liberal feminist slogans.

Subversion of Tradition: A Feminist Postcolonial Agenda

Even as women became active collaborators in reviving a nationalistic patriarchy founded on the revival of tradition, we can see attempts in the Indian feminist movement to subvert the new patriarchy in its own way. Indian feminism has progressively engaged in challenging the inherent assumptions of womanhood and has consistently attempted to clear socio-cultural spaces for the voices of Indian women. We shall examine here primarily two areas of interrogation which have been central to feminist subversive politics, the first concerning the deconstruction of the ‘Other’ and the second about decolonizing sexuality.

Deconstructing the Other

Postcolonial discourses have dealt lengthily on the politics of representation underlying colonialism, in the construction of the ‘Other’ - ‘the Orient’, as well in the self-representation of ‘Europe’. ‘The Orientals’, as Said observes ‘were viewed in a framework constructed out of biological determinism and moral political admonishment,’ along with all other people variously designated as backward, degenerate, uncivilized, retarded. The ‘Orient existed for the West’ on its “natural” role as an appendage to Europe’.

The ‘othering’ of the Oriental in the colonial discourse is reflected strongly in the representation of woman as the ‘Other’ as pointed out by the feminist philosopher Simone de Beauvoir in her classic work The Second Sex. Beauvoir poses the question: “What is a woman”? and responds: “she is simply what man decrees; thus she is called ‘the sex’, by which is meant that she appears essentially to the male as a sexual being. For him she is sex – absolute sex, no less. She is defined and differentiated with reference to man and not he with reference to her; she is the incidental, the inessential as opposed to the essential. He is the Subject, he is the Absolute – she is the Other.”

The construction of woman’s identity as the ‘Other’ leads to immense conflict for the woman-within herself and in relation to man. Again in the words of de Beauvoir:

Now, what peculiarly signalizes the situation of woman is that she – a free and autonomous being like all human creatures – nevertheless finds herself living in a world where men compel her to assume the status of the Other. They propose to stabilize her as object and to doom her to immanence since her transcendence is to be overshadowed and forever transcended by another ego (conscience) which is essential and sovereign. The drama of woman lies in this conflict between the fundamental aspirations of every subject (ego) – who always regards the self as the essential and the compulsions of a situation in which she is the inessential. How can a human being in woman’s situation attain fulfillment? What roads are open to her? Which are blocked? How can independence be recovered in a state of dependency? What circumstances limit woman’s liberty and how can they be overcome?

The discussion on the question of women’s identity is made more complex by French feminist philosopher Luce Irigaray, who disagrees with de Beauvoir’s designation of woman as the Other. She argues that both the subject and the Other are masculine mainstays of a closed phallogocentric signifying economy that achieves its totalizing goal through the exclusion of the feminine altogether. For Beauvoir, women are the negative of men, the lack against which masculine identity differentiates itself, for Irigaray, that particular dialectic constitutes a system that excludes an entirely different economy of signification. Women are not only represented falsely within the Sartrian frame of signifying subject and signified Other, but the falsity of the signification points out the entire structure of representation as inadequate.

I want to problematize further the question of women’s identity and representation particularly setting it against the backdrop of the silenced and effaced Indian woman. For this I bring to our discussion the much quoted question of Gayatri Spivak: “Can the subaltern speak?” According to Spivak, if the subaltern has no history and cannot speak in the context of colonial production, the subaltern as female is even more deeply in shadow. Spivak gives examples of the silenced subaltern women by looking at the documentation of sati in colonial India and argues that she is always being written with recourse to a form of representation which is incapable of bearing adequate witness to her subject position. Lack of an account of women’s experience leads Spivak to reflect on whether the subaltern can even speak. Spivak’s reading of the Indian women from the colonial discourses is frighteningly true even today as clear from the discourses around the issue of alarming rapes in Haryana reported by the media in the recent weeks. According to one of the lead articles on this titled “Lost in Haryana Rape Debate, a Woman’s story”, a 16 year old girl who was savagely assaulted and raped by eight men shuttered up her heart and mind for the first ten days, hoping silence would kill her memories of the violence, wrenching physical pain and the waves of shame, anger and fear. In this context of Haryana, where 19 rapes were reported in 30 days, and the majority of the violated being Dalit women, Spivak’s question echoes again: “Can the subaltern speak?” In these horror stories from Haryana, we did not hear much the voice of the violated subaltern, but everyone heard even beyond the boundaries of Indian territory and much to India’s shame- the verdict of the caste inscribed khap panchayats, which was voiced by none other than the former Chief Minister of Haryana. In the prescription that the legalization of child marriage would serve as a remedy for sexual crimes against women, what resounds again is the question of identity construction of the Indian woman. This takes our discussion to the next issue which I consider is basic to the deconstruction of defined identities, that is decoloniozing sexuality.

Decolonizing Sexuality

In its critical engagement with tradition, addressing sexuality has been a problematic yet important issue of the feminist agenda. According to Indian feminist theorists, “the sexed specificity of the female body" has become a site through which patriarchal discourse has inscribed its parochial agendas. As we have seen earlier, in India, the female body, and especially its capacity for birth has played an important symbolic and material role in the emergence of national or community identities. Here we take the discussion one step further to see how this has inscribed women’s sexuality. The invocation of "Bharat-mata" or the Mother-India by freedom fighters as a proto-nationalist weapon during anti-colonial struggles served as a form of deification which endorsed the traditional heterosexist role of women. An imagery deployed to express woman’s sexual role was that of her body as the as productive land and the man as sower of the seed. Feminist theorist Leela Dube decodes this patriarchal symbolism of land and seed by pointing out that in equating woman’s body with the field or the earth, man claims ownership over her sexuality. Just as he is entitled to have control over her sexuality, and over the product of her sexuality, he is entitled to have control over her labour and the proceeds of her labour.

An important feminist intervention towards decolonizing the sexuality of Indian women has been the interrogation of the deification of the chaste woman. In the path-breaking work on The Sexual Economies of Modern India, Mary John and Janaki Nair observe that the valorization of celibacy in order to build a nation of patriotic heroes gradually culminated in the exaltation of the 'chaste' Hindu widow whose abstinence from sex became a symbolic rejection of colonial dominance. In their words: "it is not virginity that is upheld as an ideal for women so much as the notion of the chaste wife, an empowered figure in (Hindu) myth who functions as a means of taming or domesticating the more fearful aspects of the woman's sexual appetite."

Feminist analysis has explored further into the many facets of the crucial intersections between patriarchal structures and the workings of obligatory heterosexuality. Deepa Mehta’s film Fire which shows a lesbian relationship between two Indian housewives generated severe protest from many fronts, the contention being the fear of the collapse of the Institution of marriage and stopping of the reproduction of human beings if women's sexual needs get fulfilled through lesbian acts. However, a sharper scrutiny of the issue reveal that the uneasiness with the lesbian question is far beyond the question of marriages collapsing. The homophobic discourse in India continues to inscribe the label 'western' on to queer identities. In a response to the film Fire, the Shiv Sena Supremo Bal Thackeray seemed to have remarked that "such things" were not a part of Indian culture. According to feminist analysts, the post-British nation state saw the need to assert its 'manliness' through an exaggerated heterosexuality that inevitably employed women as bearers of nationalist ideology. 'Masculine' independent India could no longer carry the mark of the penetrated receiver - this stigma had to be displaced immediately, and women became the convenient site for this displacement.

Today, the attempts to colonize Indian women’s sexuality continues. This is evident in the moral policing exercised by the so called defenders of Indian culture and tradition, as witnessed in the Mangalore pub episode, and in the campaigns by Hindutva activists in North India against "western" modes of dressing which according to them are 'corrupting' Indian women. Even as women bear the marks, sometimes violent marks of transgression on their bodies, there are also signs of women’s refusal to be guardians of the nation’s morality. The growing assertion of women’s sexual desire and of alternative sexualities, made visible through the mushrooming of movements and publications gives evidence to this. In India, there is a growing feminist involvement with the rights of women to their lives and bodies, argues the authors of Sexual Economies in Modern India. In their opinion, for too long, it was not women’s sexual experiences that were at stake, but the elaborate codes of honor inscribed on their bodies.

While the colonizing and hegemonic move continues, the counter-hegemonic is also at work as in the ‘Pink Chaddi’ campaign which became an instant success drawing thousands, in saying a clear and loud NO to the moral policing of the identity makers of Indian women today. This illustrates feminist theorist Judith Butler’s observation that ‘Inasmuch as “identity” is assured through the stabilizing concepts of sex, gender, and sexuality, the very notion of “the person” is called into question by the cultural emergence of those “incoherent” or “discontinuous” gendered beings who appear to be persons but who fail to conform to the gendered norms of cultural intelligibility by which persons are defined.’ To conclude, I find the questions raised by Butler in her classic work Gender Trouble very applicable to the situation of Indian women. She asks: “To what extent is “identity” a normative ideal than a descriptive feature of experience? And how do the regulatory practices that govern gender also govern culturally intelligible notions of identity?” I think decolonization of the mind is imperative for a critical interrogation into the identity question, and for this it is important to initiate -as Edward Said points out- the “unlearning” of the inherent dominative mode,” to which I would add also - the inherent subordinate mode.
Thank You.

--------------------------------------------
[ 2 ]. Cf. Shobha De, “Has anything changed since Valmiki wrote the Ramayana?” in Sunday Times, Bangalore, 21 March 2010, p.18.
*Both these quotes are from Kum Kum Sangari and Suresh Vaid (eds) Recasting Women: Essays in Colonial History, New Delhi: Zubaan 2006.
[ 3 ]. John Mc Leod, Beginning Postcolonialism, Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 2000, pp. 172-173.
[ 4 ]. Edward Said: Orientalism: Western Conceptions of the Orient, New Delhi: Penguin Books 2001, p.40.
[ 5 ]. John Mc Leod, Beginning Postcolonialism, p. 174.
[ 6 ]. Nishant Shahani , "Resisting Mundane Violence: Feminism and Queer Identity in Post-colonial India," Michigan Journal of Feminist Studies, (2003), Vol. 17, pp. 27-46 accessed from http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.ark5583.0017.002 on 2 Oct.2012.
[ 7 ]. Partha Chatterjee, “ The Nationalist Resolution on the Women’s Question” in Kum Kum Sangari and Suresh Vaid(eds) Recasting Women: Essays in Colonial History, New Delhi: Zubaan 2006, pp.233-253.
[ 8 ]. Ibid.
[ 9 ]. Uma Chakravarti “Whatever happened to the Vedic Dasi?: Orientalism, Nationalism and a Script for the Past” in Recasting Women, pp. 27-87, here 28.
[ 10 ]. Nishant Shahani, "Resisting Mundane Violence" - Feminism and Queer Identity in Post-colonial India’
[ 11 ]. Said, Orientalism, p. 207.
[ 12 ]. Ibid., p. 204
[ 13 ]. Ibid., p. 86
[ 14 ]. Simone de Beauvoir, Simone The Second Sex (Vintage Books, 1973, p.301
[ 15 ]. Ibid.
[ 16 ]. Cf. Luce Irigaray, This Sex Which Is Not One, trans. Catherine Porter with Carolyn Burke(Ithaca: Cornell University press, 1985), as discussed by Judith Butler in Gender Trouble, New York: Routledge, 1999, p.14.
[ 17 ]. Gaytri Spivak Chakravorti, “Can the Subaltern Speak” in Williams and Chrisman (eds) Colonial Discourse and Post-Colonial Theory: A Reader, New York: Columbia University Press,1994,pp. 66-111.
[ 18 ]. Ibid.
[ 19 ]. Smriti Kak Ramachandran, The Hindu, 12 October 2012, p.1.
[ 20 ]. The Hindu, 11 October 2012, p.1.
[ 21 ]. An important work analyzing critically the question of sexuality of Indian women is by Mary John and Janaki Nair, A Question of Silence? The Sexual Economies of Modern India (London: Zed Books, 1998)
[ 22 ]. Irene Gedalof, Against Purity: Rethinking Identity with Indian and Western Feminisms (London: Routledge, 1999), 37.
[ 23 ]. Leela Dube, “Seed and Earth: The Symbolism of Biological Reproduction and Sexual Relations in Production” in Leela Dube, Leacock and Ardner (eds) Visibility and power: Essays on Women in Society and Development, Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1986, pp. 22-53.
[ 24 ]. John and Nair, A Question of Silence? p. 17.
[ 25 ]. BBC News Online, 9 December 1998.
[ 26 ]. The Hindu, 14 December, 1998.
[ 27 ]. Nishant Shahani, "Resisting Mundane Violence" - Feminism and Queer Identity in Post-colonial India.’
[ 28 ]. John and Nair, A Question of Silence?..., p.8.
[ 29 ]. Judith Butler, Gender Trouble, p.23.
[ 30 ]. Ibid.
[ 31 ]. Said, Orientalism, p.28.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Feminism

...Feminism in Bangladesh: Establishing equal rights between men & women in young generation. SADMAN ANIS Students University of Liberal Arts Bangladesh ABSTRACT This is basically exploratory study and was conducted at University of Liberal Arts Bangladesh & United International University, Dhanmondi,Dhaka, Bangladesh over a period of 10 days started from 1st December, 2012 to 10th December, 2010. The main objective of this study is to describe what the condition of feminism in Bangladesh and what is the thinking of our varsity girl about feminism. Total 21 respondents were selected based on age class of 18-22. Feminism is a belief in the right of women to have political, social, and economic equality with men. It is a discourse that involves various movements, theories, and philosophies which are concerned with the issue of gender difference, advocate equality for women, and campaign for women’s rights and interests. According to some, the history of feminism can be divided into three waves. The first wave was in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the second was in the 1960s and 1970s and the third extends from the 1990s to the present. Feminist theory emerged from these feminist movements. It is manifest in a variety of disciplines such as feminist geography, feminist history and feminist literary criticism. Although feminism has emerged in nineteenth in the world, it is yet unknown to women of our country. The concept of feminism in Bangladesh has...

Words: 6113 - Pages: 25

Premium Essay

Feminism

...Feminism refers to political, cultural, and economic movements aimed at establishing greater rights, legal protection for women, and or women's liberation. It includes some of the sociological theories and philosophies concerned with issues of gender difference. Nancy Cott defines feminism as the belief in the importance of gender equality, invalidating the idea of gender hierarchy as a socially constructed concept. Feminism has earned itself a bad reputation, but it never undermined gender differences that exist between males and females. A man can never be as good a mother as a female can. Similarly, a woman can never be as good a father as a male can. While accepting these anatomical and physiological differences between the two genders, feminism seeks for both genders to be equally respected. They are both human and as a species, humans cannot progress without either one of them. Maggie Humm and Rebecca Walker divide the history of feminism into three waves. The first wave transpired in the nineteenth and early twentieth century’s, the second occurred in the 1960s and 1970s, and the third extends from the 1990s to the present. In each wave of the movement, though men have taken part in significant responses to feminism, the relationship between men and feminism has been complex. Historically, a number of men have engaged with feminism. Philosopher Jeremy Bentham demanded equal rights for women in the eighteenth century. In 1866, philosopher John Stuart Mill presented a women's...

Words: 1249 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Feminism

...3 TRENDS IN FEMINISM Structure 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Objectives 3.3 Liberal Feminism 3.3.1 Liberal Thought 3.3.2 Classical Liberal Feminism 3.3.3 Second Wave Liberal Feminism 3.3.4 Weakness/Limitations of the Liberal Feminism 3.3.5 Contribution to the Women’s Movement 3.4 Marxist Feminism 3.4.1 Foundations of Marxist Feminism 3.4.2 Other Key Elements in Marxist Feminism 3.4.3 Limitations of Marxist Feminism 3.4.4 Contribution to the Women’s Movement 3.5 Psychoanalytic Feminism 3.5.1 The Beginnings of Psychoanalytic Feminism – Countering Freudian Theories 3.5.2 Explanation by other Theorists 3.5.3 Limitations of Psychoanalytic Feminism 3.5.4 Contribution to the Women’s Movement 3.6 Radical feminism 3.6.1 Definition 3.6.2 The influences that shaped Radical Feminism 3.6.3 What are the variations of Radical Feminism? 3.6.3.1 Radical- Libertarian Feminism 3.6.3.2 Radical-Cultural Feminism 3.6.4 Radical Feminism – Its Structure 3.6.5 The Outcomes of the Movement 3.6.6 Critiques of Radical Feminism 3.6.7 Contribution to the Women’s Movement 3.7 Postmodern Feminism 3.7.1 Postmodern Thought 3.7.2 Postmodern rethinking of psychological explanation of gender 3.7.3 Postmodern Feminist 3.7.4 Limitations of Postmodern feminism 3.7.5 Contribution to the women’s Movement 3.8 Black Feminism and Womanism 3.8.1 The Beginnings of Black Feminism 3.9 Cyber Feminism 3.9.1 Origin of Cyber Feminism 3.9.2 Definition of the 100 Anti Thesis 3.9.3 Cyber art and its relation to Cyber feminism 3.9.4 Cyber...

Words: 17769 - Pages: 72

Premium Essay

Feminism In Islam And Feminism

...Introduction Islam and feminism are often related together in most of discussion as there are some people blame Islam for not giving freedom to women and some other people used to establish human’s right according to Islam especially for feminist properties. Feminism is defined as both a political view and a theory where the subject of analysis centres on gender and provided a platform for women to claim equality, rights and justice. Feminism in basis concerned on four foremost, which are to clarify the origins and reasons of gender inequality, describe the operation and ingenuity of this situation, portrays effective approaches to either beget full equality between genders or possibly improve the impacts of continuous inequality and envision...

Words: 1436 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Feminism

...Feminism Feminism implies a group of likeminded individuals who are united by their ideologies and their purpose which is to identify, implement and protect the status of women with regard to their political, social, economic and cultural rights. Members of such groups are persuaded that the womenfolk ought to have same opportunities in employment and education as their male counterparts. The study of the roles of women in society and space women have generally occupied in society is known as feminist theory. This theory has its roots in the Feminist movements. There are various forms of feminism depending on the functions and its attempt to explain the nature of the relationships between the men and women. Such include Liberal Feminism, Radical Feminism, Marxist and Socialist Feminism, Eco-Feminism, Cultural Feminism (Hannam p589). Liberal feminism is a type of feminism that operates or is actively undertaken in any conventional society so as to incorporate women into the structure of that society. It started after the American Revolution and was pioneered by Mary Wollstonecraft and Abigail Adams with its main focus being to campaign for equality for women (Fisanick p757).Radical Feminism is that type of feminism that is attributed with having given rise to many of the other form of feminism. These radicals as they came to be known started this pressure group in the year 1967-1968 after the civil rights and peace movements ended. They didn’t just desire to achieve social change...

Words: 1204 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Feminism

...Kiana Rivera ENG 101/1:00 Shafer FEMINISM IS THE RADICAL NOTION THAT WOMEN ARE PEOPLE Bra-burning and man-hating extremists, feminists are branded as insane, radical women who want to establish a matriarchy. While some feminists are angry and some hate men, not all feminists do. Actually, according to Kristin Rowe-Finkbeiner in The F-Word: Feminism in Jeopardy, feminism “simply means the belief in the social, political, and economic equality of the sexes.” (Feminism, Oppoising Viewpoints, pg 14) We only ever hear of the negative associated with feminism. When anti-feminist people are asked questions, most don’t understand why they believe that feminism is wrong and extreme; they do not understand why it is so vitally important, and why, even in 2013, it is still a relevant issue. Although there's a lot of information about feminism out there, much of it is judgmental, misinformed, or quite simply false. Women should have equal rights as men, and taking a stand to achieve this ideal with feminism is what’s slowly accomplishing this goal. According to the online Merriam-Webster dictionary, feminism is “the belief that men and women should have equal rights and opportunities; organized activity in support of women's rights and interests.”  (Merriam-Webster Dictionary, pg 1) In an article by Rachel Fudge, published in 2005 she brings up a very valid point on the issue of feminism and the many years that is has been around: “Despite 150 years of activism in pursuit of women's...

Words: 3105 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Feminism

...The notion of sexism is a very recent idea in our society. The idea that men were superior to and different from women was so deeply integrated into much thinking that most people never thought to question it. Throughout the history of ideas, female inferiority has been seen as the natural order of things. This is where feminism comes into place... feminism is the view which examines the world from the viewpoint of women, hence this 'traditional' view that men dominate women is challenged by feminists, as feminism believes that women are disadvantaged relative to men and that female interests are ignored or devalued by society. Feminism is therefore the movement which essentially campaigns for equality for women in society; examples of feminist groups which have campaigned for equal rights are the suffragettes and suffragists who protested for the right to vote for women in the 20th century. As Paula Trelchler herself put it... feminism is the radical notion that women are people. Liberal feminist Gavron suggested that women are trapped by the traditional roles within the family and that they should have more choice with regards to marriage and family life. Oakly further argued that the mother housewife role has been responsible for the subordination of women in the workforce. Female professional workers are three times less likely to be married than their fellow male workers. Oakly criticized Young and Wilmott, who in their 1972 study suggested that men were doing more in...

Words: 2457 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Feminism

...the works written by feminist authors, I have a better understanding of what a feminist actually is. I also have a better understanding of my identification with feminism. Feminism is an ongoing collection of movements and ideologies that advocate for the betterment of women and a feminist is someone who supports this idea. However, my answer still remains the same as it did; I do not identify as a feminist. It would be an insult to feminist leaders for me to call myself one. I support feminist ideas and feel as though women have been oppressed and still are oppressed, but I am not an active supporter, therefore I would not call myself a feminist. I feel as though a feminist is someone who is active in their support for the movement, i.e. advocating for women by either teaching, writing, protesting, or doing things of that nature to improve the treatment of women. There is a major difference in saying that you support feminism and actually doing something to show that support. To further explain my understanding of feminism, I want to uncover the different layers of oppression that women face. While in the 1900’s the goal of feminism was for women to receive equal treatment to men, feminism is no longer in opposition to just men, but race, class, and gender as well. This is how the intersectional approach to feminism occurred. Intersectionality was introduced in class through Crenshaw’s essay about the racial dimensions of sexual harassment of African-American women. Intersectionality...

Words: 998 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Feminism

...The ideological position of Feminism has been battling politics since the late 1960s (Weedon, 1997), with the feminist movement highlighting concerns towards “education, welfare rights, equality of opportunity, pay and conditions…” (Weedon, 1997, p. 1). Feminists believed in autonomy, were for the anti-discrimination legislations and gender-neutral laws and politics (Paterman, 2000). Specifically looking at the feminist values of Welfare, women’s identity, the fight to be seen as a full citizen and Wollstonecraft’s Dilemma (Paterman, 2000) and the decisions made around them, gives a clear insight into the ideological position of Feminism. * Feminists focus on three types of independency; safety (for both themselves and their country), citizenship (gained through property ownership and ability to sell their labour) and ability to self govern (not have the male of the house bring the money home and make the decisions) (Paterman, 2000, p. 135). However, both Britain and Australian governments prevented any of these to happen, as the patriarchal welfare state did not support women to work in paid employment, nor did it support women to have control of the money. During this period of time women were seen to live with their husbands and children as a family, where they would be supported financially and kept safe. For the women whom choose to divorce their husbands, Peterman (2000) discovered that “after divorce, United States reveals, a women’s standard of living can fall by...

Words: 1061 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Feminism

...Feminism: Feminism is a diverse, competing, and often opposing collection of social theories, political movements, and moral philosophies, largely motivated by or concerning the experiences of women, especially in terms of their social, political, and economical inequalities. One institutionally predominant type of feminism focuses on limiting or eradicating gender inequality to promote women's rights, interests, and issues in society. Another opposing type of modern feminism, with deep historical roots, focuses on earning, and establishing equity by and for women, vis-a-vis men, to promote those same rights, interests, and issues, regardless of gender considerations. Thus, as with any ideology, political movement or philosophy, there is no single, universal form of feminism that represents all feminists. The most well-known types of feminism are: liberal feminism, social feminism, radical feminism, and post-modern feminism. Liberal feminism seeks no special privileges for women and simply demand that everyone receive equal consideration without discrimination on the basis of sex. Liberal feminists would seek to remove barriers that prevent equal access for women to information technology jobs not only to provide economic equality but to provide access to higher-paying jobs for women. In contrast to liberal feminism, socialist feminism rejects individualism and positivism. Social feminism believes that technology and the social shaping of technology have often been conceptualized...

Words: 924 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Feminism

...Socialist Feminist Criticism: You Dropped the Bomb on Me, Baby     Feminism and gender studies have been described as having the ability to “challenge literary and culture theory to confront the difficult task of assimilating the findings of an expanding sphere of inquiry” (Contemporary Literary Criticism 567). This area of study has taken center stage during the last fifty years, not only in our society, but also in literary criticism. Although the terrain Feminism traverses can hardly be narrowed down to one single definition, the exploration of the genre can, at times, be the most intriguing feature of the criticism itself. While feminism has undoubtedly changed the way women and gender roles are considered in society today, it has also had an impact on the way that I, too, read literature, look at American culture, and view the world.     Walter Ong suggests that “‘literature’ itself is the product of—or completely wound up and ‘imbricated’ in—the social contexts out of which it grows” (CLC 461). The social contexts that exist in our society have not only affected our societal systems themselves, but also have changed the way we view our class systems, gender roles, and sexual choices. Viewing society from a Marxist perspective can also help us decipher the unspoken rules that govern us. “Not only do Marxist critics want criticism to be constantly aware of history—both present and past history—in reading and literature, they also demand that the criticism become more overtly...

Words: 1145 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Feminism

...Feminism Feminism is a range of movements and ideologies that share a common goal: to define, establish, and achieve equal political, economic, cultural, personal, and social rights for women. This includes seeking to establish equal opportunities for women in education and employment. A feminist advocates or supports the rights and equality of women. Feminist movements have campaigned and continue to campaign for women's rights, including the right to vote, to hold public office, to work, to fair wages or equal pay, to own property, to education, to enter contracts, to have equal rights within marriage, and to have maternity leave. Feminists have also worked to promote bodily autonomy and integrity, and to protect women and girls from rape, sexual harassment, and domestic violence. Feminist campaigns are generally considered to be one of the main forces behind major historical societal changes for women's rights, particularly in the West, where they are near-universally credited with having achieved women's suffrage, gender neutrality in English, reproductive rights for women (including access to contraceptives and abortion), and the right to enter into contracts and own property. Although feminist advocacy is and has been mainly focused on women's rights, some feminists, including bell hooks, argue for the inclusion of men's liberation within its aims because men are also harmed by traditional gender roles. Feminist theory, which emerged from feminist movements, aims to understand...

Words: 294 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Feminism

...IS FEMINISM HARMFUL OR BENEFICIAL TO AMERICAN SOCIETY? Running head: IS FEMINISM HARMFUL OR BENEFICIAL TO AMERICAN SOCIETY? Is Feminism Harmful or Beneficial to the American Society? Name Institution Is Feminism Harmful Or Beneficial To American Society? Feminism refers to the constant advocacy of woman rights, which seeks to make women equal to men in many areas including social, political, economic and even cultural. The American Society has embraced it by reducing the barriers that women come across in the workplaces or when vying for political posts (Sandberg & Scovell, 2013). Apparently, it seeks to ensure that women also have a say in the country’s dealings, and they have equal rights to education. As a matter of fact, feminism is highly beneficial to the American society because it has enabled women prosper in businesses, schools, and marriages. It is now possible for women to vie for political positions and be heard. Hooks (2000) asserts that when one empowers a woman, the whole society is empowered. Besides, it has improved the quality of lives for most women who now have access to various public forums. Thus, it is possible to find women leaders, doctors, professors, or even mothers who are good in whatever they do. They are also given equal opportunities in their workplace when it comes to a job application and even career advancement. The women in the workplaces earn...

Words: 594 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Feminism

...Feminism by Madiha Rauf Feminism is a collective struggle towards acceptance of women existence and recognition of their contributions. Its’ basic philosophy is to challenge the social status quo by defining and supporting women rights. Historically the term of feminism is established in western society as a protest against the laws and policies that compelled women to work in a subordinate role in the 18th century. Millett characterizes feminism as a “system of political, economic and social equality between sexes” (Millett, 1970: 74). While it is defined as “politics directed at changing existing power relations between women and men in a society” by Weedon, (1987).Hooks (2000) explains feminism as “a movement to end sexism, sexist exploitation, and oppression”. Feminism is diverse collections of social theories through which many focus on analyzing the social constructions of gender while other focus on gender inequality and promoting women’s rights. By describing major forms of feminism, Tuttle, Lisa (1986) says, radical feminism considers patriarchy as a root cause of women oppressions so believes on radical social changes while liberal feminism asserts the equality of men and women through legal and political reforms. Socialist feminism supports Marx’s ideas &relates the oppression of women to labor exploitation and class structure. While essential and cultural feminism believe that females value because of their special differences & inherent ability to care. Many...

Words: 592 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Feminism

...knee. Furthermore, I was sent home for this incident because “it was suggestive to the boys”… Let that sink in! My school was, slowly but surely, making clear to me was that they would much rather send me home and take away any academic lesson I would have learned from that day because of the small fact that an inch of my knee might be of disturbance to a hormonal high school boy. This is the point in my life when I needed feminism. I always understood the term feminism to be straightforward: anyone who believes in equality between men and women, as well as the perseverance of self-worth regardless of gender, is a feminist. However, my generation of women has a far more straight forward view of feminism than I do. Women who recommend the values of feminism now frown upon identifying themselves as feminist. Why is that? Many misconceptions and misunderstandings become part of the issue when a person has a lack of understanding or comprehension of exactly what the term feminism truly means. It is important to know the difference between equality and feminism. Comprehending the meaning of the two also empowers a women to be grounded and given the capability to know what they stand for. A Huffington post “Poll: Few Identify as Feminists, But Most Believe in Equality of Sexes”, conducted a poll that displayed the percentage of women who would identify themselves as feminist and only that of 23% consider to be feminist while the vast majority believes in equality. The gap that...

Words: 1543 - Pages: 7