Free Essay

First Balkan War

In: Historical Events

Submitted By ageo7836
Words 2517
Pages 11
The Balkan Crisis represents a series of tensions in the region that arose, in part, due to the decline of the Ottoman regime in Europe. This culminated in the 1908 annexation of Bosnia-Herzegovina by Austria-Hungary and the Balkan Wars preceding World War I. While not directly causing WWI, these events laid the foundations for disputes amongst the Great Powers as well as solidifying the existing Bismarckian alliance system. Furthermore, the competing nationalistic interests manifested themselves in the Balkan Wars which were largely a war for control of Macedonia, under the guise of liberation from Ottoman rule. The role of nationalism was not the traditionally espoused Serbian aggression, but political elites in all European states using nationalism as a vehicle to manipulate their populations. The Balkan Wars deserve study because they show the burgeoning role of nationalism in European politics and set the precedent for events that unfolded later in the twentieth century.

Historians often attribute nationalism as one of the major causative factors WWI. This statement cannot be blindly accepted because although nationalism is clearly one of the dominant trends of the twentieth century, it was still in its infancy before WWI. The decision to go to war is decided by rulers, not at least initially by the populace. Therefore, nationalism is worthy of definition, especially with respect to a region as complex as the Balkans, where these issues are still a problem today. Although a myriad of definitions of nationalism could be given, a useful starting point would be to suggest that people who share a common culture, language and ethnicity live together in a state where sovereignty resides in the people. Nationalism often leads to the idea that a nation has a claim to land which is sacred and non-transferable. This is demonstrated in the aggressive policy of French Revanchism in the Third Republic aggressively seeking an alliance with Russia, and ties in to the central tenet of this essay. That is, the Balkan Wars were a three way nationalistic, propaganda-driven conflict to control Macedonia, where Greece, Serbia and Bulgaria all claimed a right to Macedonia on the basis of historical arguments. As Hale succinctly surmised, “Nationalism is most frequently cited as a force impelling Europe towards war in 1914.”
The issue of nationalism is particularly complicated in a region like the Balkans due to its history and geography. The alluvial plains along the river basins and maritime coastlands fostered contacts with both the east and west, whilst communities in the rugged terrain of the Dinaric highlands have had a tendency toward cultural isolationism. Consequently, the Balkans has always been politically and culturally heterogeneous. However, the advent of Ottoman rule eradicated the existing political structure, instead imposing the religious “millet system”. Hence, the period of the Balkan Crisis illustrates a growing ethnic identity, or what has been termed a “re-awakening” of the populace, to gradually replace the imposed religious identity people held. That said, the “Macedonian Question” was a particularly important issue for the nationalistic governments in Greece, Bulgaria and Serbia. To gain support of the natives who were ethnically diverse, they mobilised mass propaganda and terrorism, from the viewpoint of linguistic, cultural or religious affinity, which the new monarchies aimed to share with the heterogeneous, yet largely parochially minded Macedonian population. This Balkan scenario was coupled with a complicated system of alliances and self interest amongst the European “Great Powers”. Certainly the Russian Empire had particular interest in the region for a long time, and had been frustrated by the western powers’ insistence on propping up the decrepit Ottoman Empire. Russia’s self-interest was promoted by both real, and an apparent, atmosphere of Pan-Slavism amongst the Slavs, who formed the ethno-linguistic majority in the Balkans. The Russian cause was furthered by their image as the Champions of Orthodoxy, thereby attempting to extend influence to Romania and Greece, and the modelling of Moscow as a “Third Rome”. In direct opposition to this was the Austro-Hungarian Empire which had a long established hegemony over Croatia and Slovenia, and wished to expand its influence in the region, especially in Bosnia-Herzegovina to replace the “old, sick” Turkish rule. This also put Austria at odds with its former, albeit intermittent ally, Serbia. The new kingdom believed that all southern Slavs should be independent of foreign rule and united as one, Serb-led, country. Austria-Hungary’s ally had little interest in the region, however, its ultra-militaristic and nationalistic regimen viewed war as a necessity. Concurrently, it has been argued, the Third French Republic’s anti-German education system was geared towards indoctrinating an entire generation ready to fight and regain Alsace-Lorraine, which was lost in humiliating fashion during the Franco-Prussian War. The effect of all these various nationalistic drives is that by 1914 the stage for war was set in the “powder keg of Europe”. The assassination of Franz Ferdinand gave the excuse Germany was looking for to go to war. Germany prompted Austria to give Serbia an unacceptable ultimatum.

The Austrian chancellor Metternich, while often criticised for his overt imperialism, illustrated the problems with nationalism in statements such as “Italy is a geographical expression” and “what are the Greeks?” Nationality cannot easily be defined because the language people speak can be liable to change in the span of a single generation, the religion of a region is determined by its local ruler, and there is a large presence of various nationalities in the Balkans. Therefore, in Macedonia, three competing states argued for the annexation of Macedonia on the basis of cultural, historical, linguistic or religious ties. What conclusion can be drawn from this? At its core, nationalism is what people aspire to be. While this may seem controversial, it is essentially the case in the Balkans where an “ignorant and illiterate” peasantry owed loyalty to their local church and chief on the basis of their millet system. Only later was nationalism imposed from above by politicians or powerbrokers. As such, in Bosnia-Herzegovina, politicians from Croatia told Catholics to aspire to Croatian national identity, and the Kingdom of Serbia incited nationalism in the Orthodox population, but the large majority of Muslims did not aspire to any identity at that stage. So while the Bulgarians claimed Macedonia on the basis that it was once the heartland of a Bulgarian Empire, the Serbs claimed linguistic and ethnic affinity, and the Greeks drew on the Ancient rule of Alexander the Great in the region. On the basis of irredentist claims, an interesting situation presents, whereby Serbian, Bulgarian and Greek governments created a “three-way propaganda contest through churches and schools to take control of the thoughts of the Macedonian people.”

The Balkan Wars set the precedent in the twentieth century for “massive wars and ethnic cleansing,” highlighting the extent to which nationalism played a role in fuelling WWI. The nature of the Balkan Wars is best illustrated by Grey’s quote, “The war began as a ‘war of liberation,’ it became a ‘war of annexation,’ and ended as a ‘war of extermination.’” The Balkan states were already autonomous by the advent of the Balkan Wars, but the political power-brokers in each state incited nationalism in their subjects on “justified hatred of the age old Turkish oppressor,” in order to mobilise for war. So the traditional view that the inhabitants of the Balkans were “inherently belligerent” or possessing “age-old hatreds” is somewhat questionable. However, the political elite in the Balkan states had aggressive nationalistic policies of territorial expansion and viewed the Balkan Wars as pre-empting Habsburg expansion in the region. The first Balkan War led to the rapid defeat of Turkey in Europe. However, the Balkan League broke down soon after into the second Balkan War when Serbia and Greece made a secret treaty depriving Bulgaria of Macedonia, with Serbia claiming all of Northern Macedonia, having been deprived of Albania by Austria. Having acquired Northern Macedonia, the Serbs began to “inculcate national values in the population”.
Having discussed the Balkan Wars, it would not be unreasonable to assume the Balkan problems were resolved amongst the Balkan States. However, a few important issues remained. Firstly, the Balkan Wars helped revive the Concert of Europe in that Great Power approval was needed to establish new states. This helped bring in Austria and Russia in opposing camps, with Austria ironically wanting an independent Albania to cut Serbia off from the coast, whereas Russia desired a friendly warm-water port which Serbia would undoubtedly provide to its Slavic brethren. This helped solidify to Balance of Power which is so often cited as one of the causes of WWI. Secondly there was still the issue that Serbia the Kingdom did not include all Serbs in the Balkans. The Austro-Hungarian annexation of Bosnia was a source of ire to the Serbian Kingdom which espoused the loyalty of the significant Serb population in Bosnia, and the Muslims who were viewed as “Islamicised Serbs.” It is important to recognise that, in hindsight, the Serbs were not overly aggressive but merely operated in “framework of adopted Western European nation-state nationalism,” and as such, sought to unify all Serbs into a “Greater Serbia.”

As a result the Serbian government incited nationalism in the Bosnian Serbs. The fitting quote from the Serbian foreign minister Milovanovitch that “Austria-Hungary is not a fatherland but rather a prison of numerous nationalities all panting to escape” encapsulates the atmosphere of nationalism in Bosnia at the time. Now, to suggest that the assassination of Franz Ferdinand caused WWI is highly simplistic as monarchs were frequently assassinated without major reprisals. The issue of German aggression has to be taken into account. It is inarguable that the rapidly empowered German state was agitating for a war, seen through German General Moltke’s “the sooner the better,” referring to war. Whether or not this was in response to aggressive French Revanchism is debatable. However, even though the Germans did issue the oft-quoted “blank cheque” to Austria-Hungary, it seems that none of the Great Powers “wanted war” on the enormous scale that the Alliance system made possible. The great irony that historians have struggled with is why the system which prevented war for so long and gave Europe remarkable stability broke down so tragically. The traditional answer was that the Balkans consisted of aggressive and militant nationalistic groups all vying for supremacy, whereas the explanation that the region was merely the next stage on which the Great Powers enacted their various ambitions is more plausible.

It is evident that nationalism is a major force of the twentieth century. Often, nationalism is the cited as the one major factor that caused WWI. In fact, it is the overarching thread that ties together events in the Balkan Crisis, both with regard to the actions of Greeks, Serbs and Bulgarians, and the Great Powers. What started as newly independent states naturally wishing to extend their influence drew in the reluctant involvement of Powers such as Austria-Hungary and Russia who wanted to extend their respective spheres of influence. Ironically, while these two Powers strongly desired to avoid war, they were joined in alliances by two countries in an embittered territorial dispute of their own, namely Germany and France. Hence, when Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia, the stage was set for war on an unprecedented scale.

Bibliography:

Bax, Mart, ‘ “Stagnating Identification & Violence”: A Case Study in the local sources of The War in Bosnia-Herzegovina’, Anthropological Quarterly, 70, no. 1 (January 1997), pp. 11-19

Blank, T. & Scmidt, P., ‘ “National Idenitity in a United Germany”: Nationalism or Patriotism? An Empirical Test with Respresentative Data’, Political Psychology, 24, no. 2 (2003), pp. 89-96.

Danforth, Loring, The Macedonian Conflict: Ethnic Nationalism in a Transnational World (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995), p.28.

Farrar, Larry, ‘ “Aggression versus Apathy”: The Limits of Nationalism during the Balkan Wars’, East European Quarterly, 38, no. 3 (September 2003), pp. 257-280.

Friend, Julius, The Linchpin: French-German Relations, 1950-1990 (New York: Praeger Publications, 1991), p. 61.

Gerolymatos, Andre, The Balkan Wars: Conquest, Revolution and Retribution from the Ottoman Era to the twentieth century and beyond (New York, Basic Books, 2002), p.123.

Hale, Oron, The Great Illusion 1900-1914 (New York: Harper & Row, 1971), p.11.

Howard, Michael, ‘ “The Great War”: Mystery or error?’, The National Interest, 64, Summer 2001, pp. 78-85.

Hupchick, Dennis, The Balkans: From Constantinople to Communism (New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2002), p.125.

Martin, Janet, Medieval Russia: 980-1584 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007), p.264.

Milich, Peter, Cumulative Slavicity: Cultural Interaction and Language Replacement in the North Balkans during the Slavic Migration Period, AD500-900 (Cleveland: Ohio University Press, 2005), p.11.

Ortakovski, Vladimir, Minorities in the Balkans (New York: Transnational Publications, 2000), p.53.

Petrovich, Michael, A History of Modern Serbia, 1804-1918, Volume II (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1986), p.601.

Simpson, W. & Jones, M., Europe, 1783-1914 (New York: Routledge, 2000), p.234.

--------------------------------------------
[ 2 ]. Mart Bax, ‘ “Stagnating Identification & Violence”: A Case Study in the local sources of The War in Bosnia-Herzegovina’, Anthropological Quarterly, 70, no. 1 (January 1997), pp. 11-19.
[ 3 ]. Thomas Blank & Peter Schmidt, ‘ “National Idenitity in a United Germany”: Nationalism or Patriotism? An Empirical Test with Respresentative Data’, Political Psychology, 24, no. 2 (2003), pp. 89-96.
[ 4 ]. Julius W. Friend, The Linchpin: French-German Relations, 1950-1990 (New York: Praeger Publications, 1991), p. 61.
[ 5 ]. Oron J. Hale, The Great Illusion 1900-1914 (New York: Harper & Row, 1971), p.11.
[ 6 ]. Peter Milich, Cumulative Slavicity: Cultural Interaction and Language Replacement in the North Balkans during the Slavic Migration Period, AD500-900 (Cleveland: Ohio University Press, 2005), p.11.
[ 7 ]. Dennis P. Hupchick, The Balkans: From Constantinople to Communism (New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2002), p.125.
[ 8 ]. Vladimir Ortakovski, Minorities in the Balkans (New York: Transnational Publications, 2000), p.53.
[ 9 ]. Michael Petrovich,, A History of Modern Serbia, 1804-1918, Volume II (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1986), p.601.
[ 10 ]. Janet Martin, Medieval Russia: 980-1584 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007), p.264.
[ 11 ]. Hupchick, The Balkans, p.314
[ 12 ]. William Simpson & Martin Jones, Europe, 1783-1914 (New York: Routledge, 2000), p.234.
[ 13 ]. Andre Gerolymatos, The Balkan Wars: Conquest, Revolution and Retribution from the Ottoman Era to the twentieth century and beyond (New York, Basic Books, 2002), p.123.
[ 14 ]. As cited Simpson & Jones, Europe, p.152.
[ 15 ]. Hupchick, The Balkans, p.297.
[ 16 ]. Loring M. Danforth, The Macedonian Conflict: Ethnic Nationalism in a Transnational World (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995), p.28.
[ 17 ]. Larry L. Farrar, ‘ “Aggression versus Apathy”: The Limits of Nationalism during the Balkan Wars’, East European Quarterly, 38, no. 3 (September 2003), pp. 257-280.
[ 18 ]. Hupchick, The Balkans, p.619
[ 19 ]. Farrar, ‘ “Aggression versus Apathy”, p. 263.
[ 20 ]. Michael Howard, ‘ “The Great War”: Mystery or error?’, The National Interest, 64, Summer 2001, pp. 78-85.
[ 21 ]. Hupchick, The Balkans, p. 296.
[ 22 ]. As cited in Simpson & Jones, Europe, p. 382
[ 23 ]. Simpson & Jones, Europe, p.358.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Modern History

...Topic: The world at the beginning of the 20th century Notes Timeline: 1871: Germany wins the Franco-Prussian war, and takes the provinces of Alsace and Lorraine. 1882: Germany, Austria-Hungary and Italy form an alliance called the ‘Triple Alliance’. 1889: ‘The second international’, an international congress meets in Paris. 1898: The Spanish-American war, the Philippines, Guam and Porto-Rico are transferred to the USA. 1899: Boer, settler’s rebel against British rule is South Africa. 1900: The boxer rebellion in China against foreign influence. 1901: President Mc Kindy is assassinated by an anarchist. 1906: The British battleship the dreadnaught is launched, naval race with Germany begins. 1907: The triple Entente is formed between Britain, Russia and France. 1908: A commission uncovers abuses and maltreatment of tribe’s people in the Belgian Congo. 1910: Japan annexes Korea. 1914: 28th June: The heir to the Austro-Hungarian is assassinated. 28th July: Austria bombards Belgrade, with the opening shots of WW1. 4th August: All major European powers at war. Political Ideologies: Socialism: • Developed in the 19th century as a result of industrial revolution. • Based on enlightenment assumptions: 1. Mankind was basically good. 2. Problems of society could be remedied. 3. A gov’t owes a duty to its citizens. • Marxism was the most important form of socialism • Means of producing...

Words: 3057 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Worl War I

...Asian countries alongside the diplomatic pressures, colonial conquest and military invasion especially in the regions of Africa. The domestic people faced the foreign domination and attempt of colonization. During the 1870s the Europeans succeed to under control only 10% of the African region and it was the period when Europe started to grab the African land by the 1914, around 90 percent of the African continent was under control of Europeans (The Creation, 2011). In Africa the Berlin conference played vital role in regulating colonization alongside the trade in the African regions. Similarly in the Asian region in subcontinent, the European Colonialism was established ant later on the imperialism was started in 1857 after the freedom war. The European colonialism gradually extend its control over the political powers that later on let the European regions to take control over the African and Asian Regions. After the 1870s, the European started to explore Africa with the industrial revolution that lend the European new ways to enter and new weapons to make its terror and till the 1914, it took control over ninety percent of the African region. This impact let the European to establish their...

Words: 1820 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Entrepreneurial Research

...Vietnamese games are able to compete at a global level. The purpose of this report is to provide information regarding how Emobi Games innovatively changes the whole industry. Emobi Games’ background Emobi Games is one of the very few game developers that come from Vietnam. It was originally founded in 2008 but it was not until April 2009 that Emobi Games became an independent company (Emobigames 2011). At the moment, the company’s staff is a group consists of 23 people with each person is high – skilled and have achieved certain degrees in programming, 3D designing. These people are not connected by the skills they possess but by sharing the same passion and interest in games. 7554 is a First-person-shooter game and it is the first (and currently the only) game produced by Emobi Games. The game was first introduced in April 2010 and officially released in December 2011. The game used Vision Engine 8 for graphics design, PhysX by Nvidia for physics...

Words: 1551 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

In What Ways, and with What Results, Did China Develop in the 19th Century and the Early 20th Century? Support Your Answer with Examples.

...China has gone through major changes throughout the second half of the 19th century up till the early 20th century. The result of the Opium Wars opened up China to the rest of the world, which contributed to the fall of the Qing dynasty. The Wars struck a crippling blow to the Qing Empire and it demonstrated how weak China was compared to the European powers. The ailing Qing dynasty during the middle of the 19th century created opportunities for the European imperialists who were interested in crippling China. They wanted to undermine China by enforcing foreign policies in the country, which would contribute to the growing discontent among the citizens since their monarch was hopeless. After the naval expeditions of Zheng He (1371-1435) during the Ming dynasty, the Hongwu Emperor decided to ban all trade and from then onwards, China became increasingly isolationist. The Chinese feared that the result of foreign intervention would be an attempt to take over the country therefore, all the dynasties after that continued to adopt these policies in order to prevent invaders such as Japanese pirates. During the Qing dynasty, the Qianlong Emperor rejected an offer to expand trade because he feared that by trading with foreign countries, the imperialist nations would attempt to take over China by imposing their ideas on the Chinese. China’s desire to shut itself away from the foreign countries was because of its desire to protect itself. After the Industrial Revolution, the...

Words: 1309 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Chinas First Opium War

...Chinas Opium War By: Zachary Kern In this paper, I will discuss Chinas opium problem within the 1830’s. At this point, the British Empire has established a routine shipping triangle between ports in England to ports in India; here British merchants would pick up large shipments of opium. From India, the merchants headed towards China, Canton in particular. From here the large shipments were sold to merchants using large British clipper ships, who distributed the large shipments of opium to smaller smuggling ships called “fast dragons” to be dispersed amongst the vast provinces of China. I will discuss the impact of this trade triangle for both the British and the Chinese. Also to be discussed is Imperial Commissioner Lin and his anti-opium campaign in China as well as on the British front. The Chinese and British had contrasting views on Lin and his campaign to end the mass profits the British were collecting from poisoning the Chinese community. Ultimately the opium war would conclude with the Nanjing treaty signed by the Chinese in 1842. Britain forced China to sign via threat of military and naval conquest, a tactic called gunboat diplomacy. Before we delve too far into the characters that were directly involved in the diplomacy regarding the opium situation in China, we must get a better understanding of the market conditions that the situation arose from. There is a very clear line that separates the two types of trade between the British and Chinese empires respectively...

Words: 2327 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

Imperialism

...China, imperialistic motives of the Europeans ranged from rare materials to the immense voltage of power, however how they forced upon these motives was different. These nations were both imperialized by great European powers. Furthermore, they both had Britain as a strong imperialist. In China, Britain wanted luxury goods, like silk and porcelain. Britain also looked at India for luxury goods. Gems, gold, indigo, and spices were just several of the lustful items. Different Europeans nations, ruled different parts of these nations. For India, Britain was the only critical imperialized. Unlike India, China had Britain, Germany, France, and Japan. Russia also had taken the chance to imperialize China at their weak point. After China’s Opium War in the 1800’s, western influence was crowded all around. Spheres of Influence began to form in China. India always had the British East India Company on their backs until the Sepoy...

Words: 1907 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

4th of July

...Born on the Fourth of July (film) Born of the Fourth of July is an American drama war film based on the best-selling autobiography of the Vietnamese War veteran Ron Kovic. In the film, the actor Tom Cruise plays Ron Kovic. The film is actually directed by Oliver Stone who is, in fact, a Vietnamese War veteran. The film is about a young boy, Ron, who is full of enthusiasm and wants to go to Vietnam and fight for his country. He is very patriotic at first, but he is later tormented by physically and mentally wounds, which he got from the war, from which he suffers. Ron is developing throughout the film and you could easily say that the first phase is before the war, the second is during the war and the third is after the war. The film is not only trying to tell the viewer the personal development of Ron Kovic but also the director, Oliver Stone, wanted to show what is was like to be a part of the Vietnam War, seen from a war veteran´s point of view. Ron Kovic is born of the 4th of July - the day The Declaration of Independence was signed in 1776, which to the Americans is a symbol of freedom and nationalism. The film is opening with a scene that shows Ron Kovic, whom is celebrating his 13th birthday and New York celebrating Independence Day with a parade of World War 2 veteran. His family is very caught up by the patriotic theme of the day, and they are very proud to have a son who is born on the 4th of July. The film takes place in the 60´s where the young boys are told...

Words: 970 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Opium War

...Opium War There were two Opium Wars. The first one was from 1839-1842. This war was fought between China and Britain. This war was fought over the two not seeing eye to eye on a lot of things. The second Opium War was from 1856-1860. In this war the British forces fought toward the legalization of the Opium trade. The reason they did this was to be able to expand coolie trace, to be able to open all of China to British merchants, and also to be able to expand foreign imports from internat transit duties. This was when France then joined the British. In this essay we are going to cover both of the Opium Wars. The expansion of European imperialism in Asia was all economic. In the British market there was a high demand for Chinese tea, also Chinese silk, and also Chinese porcelain. But, Britain did not have the right amount of silver to be able to trade with the Qing Empire. So, a system of barter and trade was put into effect, which was based on the Indian Opium which was created to help bridge the payment problems that Britain was having. Because of the “the subsequent exponential increase of opium in China brought about a generation of addicts and social instability.” (He, T.). This caused the British merchants and the Qing government to clash, which led to the Opium Wars. So as a “result, the British were given the island of Hong Kong and trading rights in the ports of Canton and Shanghai.” (He, T.). The first Opium War was over their conflicting views and points of their...

Words: 769 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Things They Carried By Tim O Brien: Character Analysis

...Hook High School can change and twist a person’s characteristics while they are on their quest of “fitting in”. This process of changing a person’s personality is very similar to what happened to many of the characters in the Book the Things They Carried. Context This book takes place during the Vietnam War and follows the lives of american men who are trying to survive the horrible conditions of Vietnam. Thesis In The Things They Carried by Tim O’Brien , the author uses the character development of Mary Anne and Rat Kiley as well as his own to show how being in environment like Vietnam can twist your sense of right and wrong and your mental stability because of the things you are exposed to. Body Paragraph One Topic Sentence In the Book...

Words: 1274 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

The Opium Wars

...Introduction People have blamed corporate greed for many social and economic problems, such as the pollution of our resources, the unfair pay for the working class, major recessions, and many more. It seems that some people are unaware of how much influence corporations have when war is involved. Corporations have a heavy hand in war profiteering when it comes to oil, weapons, and even essential items such as water and food. There are many examples of corporate greed’s influence on war, although I had never heard of a war directly funded or coerced by corporations until I did some research on China’s Opium Wars. Britain and China’s First Encounter The relationship between the Chinese and the British has been unstable from the beginning. Their first encounter resulted in an immediate attack on each other on the high seas. Nevertheless, on August sixth of 1793 a fleet of ships came to shore carrying an important passenger, the British Ambassador, Lord Macartney. The objective was to open trade between Britain and China. Lord Macartney brought with him many gifts for Emperor Chi’ien Lung that had been selected to represent the best that Britain had to trade. Lord Macartney met with Emperor Ch’ien Lung in a large horsehair tent chosen by the Emperor to show he was meeting with simple barbarians rather than equals. Foreigners are required to wear Chinese clothing and practice the Kowtow. The Kowtow is a ritual of respect...

Words: 1901 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

How Accurate Is It to Say That the Spread of Revolutionary Beliefs Was the Main Reason for the Fall of the Qing Dynasty 1911-12?

...How accurate is it to say that the spread of revolutionary beliefs was the main reason for the fall of the Qing dynasty 1911-12? This essay will be looking at how much of a contribution the spread of revolutionary beliefs in China had in the fall of the Qing Dynasty. In order to determine the importance of this I will therefore also be looking at other factors such as, foreign interference, double tenth and the inability to change. I believe it is partially accurate to say that the spread of revolutionary beliefs was important in the downfall of the Qing Dynasty; however it wasn’t necessarily the most important factor. This can be determined from the effects of Sun Yatsen’s anti-government movement in China. Initially, the extreme need for revolution and reform stemmed from Cixi’s need and desire for conservatism. Her oblivious attitude towards the failure of the government angered many people and essentially gave reformers the ammunition to spread their own beliefs. As previously mentioned, Sun Yatsen was one of the people who felt strongly about changing the way things worked in China. He was particularly open minded and due to his education abroad had adopted a Westernized style of thinking. Thus, Yatsen attempted to modernise and regenerate China by removing foreign control and reasserting their unique character and greatness by forming the revolutionary alliance in 1905. Within this, his greatest belief was that the only way in which China would be able to modernise was...

Words: 1312 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

China and Japan Essay

... Politically, China and Japan's reaction to Western ideas dramatically differed. When President Fillmore sent Commodore Matthew C. Perry to Japan, the ho-shogun and his advisers first resisted the visit, but finally agreed to trade with the United States upon signing the Treaty of Kanagawa in 1858. (Cohen)As a result, Western diplomats soon inundated the Land of the Rising Sun in order to persuade the nation politically, but more importantly to them, economically. The political-diplomatic, cultural-intellectual, and socio-economic relation that followed was christened the Meiji Restoration. In general, the Japanese gradually became very receptive to the concepts of democracy, liberalism, and laissez-faire, but Meiji leaders planned to remain free of Western imperialism by negotiating with Western diplomats. They did not abandon their isolationist policies of over 200 years under the Tokugawa Shogunate only to be absorbed as a European colony; instead, they wanted to learn Western military and industrialization tactics so that they could compete with Westerners politically and economically in the future. (Craig) China, however, was just the opposite. After experiencing the stresses of the Taiping Rebellion, often dubbed the world's bloodiest civil war, and then latter the horrors of the Opium Wars with Britain, China needed a political recess. They had already been deceived by the British...

Words: 804 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Could China’s ‘Humiliation’ Have Been Avoided?

...The First Opium War marked a major transition in Chinese history as it brought the nation into a modern, Eurocentric interstate system and global economy. China would become exposed to Western imperialism, and such foreign aggression and encroachment epitomizes what the Chinese call the “Century of Humiliation” – the beginning of the period being attributed to this war. The question that is posed today is whether China could have avoided humiliation. I believe that the answer is no, and such an event was inevitable due to the irreconcilable cultural traditions of China and the West. Also see how tradition may have placed China at a disadvantage First, it is important to address the worldviews belonging to both China and the West. For China, their world was based upon the precepts of Confucianism, which preordained the natural order. Heaven was the source of all authority and men were subject to the will of heaven. The emperor received authority from heaven and has absolute power. The result is a natural hierarchic order that makes inequality a fundamental part of society, reflected by the kowtow (explain) which would be performed to one’s superiors. China applied these norms of internal society to the international, thereby claiming to be the central state and creating what is known as the Sino-centric international system, based upon the belief in their cultural superiority and claim to universal kingship. THose beyond its borders were looked down upon as barbarians. This...

Words: 1227 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

A O Sba

...main Maroon groups were the Leeward and the Windward tribes, the former led by Cudjoe in Trelawny Town and the latter led by his sister Queen Nanny (and later by Quao). Over time, the Maroons came to control large areas of the Jamaican interior and they often moved down from the hills to raid the plantations. This resulted in the First Maroon War. In 1739-40 the British government in Jamaica came to an agreement with the Maroons. They were to remain in their five main towns Accompong, Trelawny Town, Moore Town, Scots Hall and Nanny Town, living under their own chief with a British supervisor. In exchange, they agreed not to harbour new runaway slaves, but rather to help catch them. They were paid a bounty for each returned slave. This last clause in the treaty naturally caused tension between the Maroons and the enslaved black population, although from time to time runaways from the plantations still found their way into Maroon settlements. | | | However, tensions between planters and Maroons remained and a Second Maroon War broke out in 1795. The Accompong Maroons remained neutral and the British left them alone. By the end of the war, all the other Maroon settlements in Jamaica had been destroyed, and Accompong alone remained. The Trelawny Town Maroons were resettled in Nova Scotia for a few brutal winters, and the...

Words: 1050 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

The Quite American

...Anyone know about the symbolism in ‘A Quiet American’ by Graham Greene? | Pyle represents the idealistic New Age America, thirsty for heroism. Phuong represents pre-war Vietnam, passive, innocent. What exactly does Fowler represent? Is it the wisdom and world-weariness of Old Europe or Britain’s involvement in the war simply for personal gain? | The symbolism of the individual characters has to be placed within the context of colonialism, since that was the relationship between the nations they each represented. Pyle's motives are far from heroic. An idealism that is motivated by interventionism in a Third World country's affairs can be dangerous and destructive, not only in the way Graham Greene saw it in the early fifties, but as history proved it by the events that unfolded years later, leading to the US war in Viet Nam. Or for what is happening now in Iraq, if you will. Fowler had the "old colonialist" wisdom that questioned Pyle's justification for violence. He had already learned that "democracy" is something many countries neither understand nor want, and any foreign attempt to impose it is doomed to failure. I don't know that this helps, but I can't see the novel any other way. | | Outline of characters | Thomas Fowler is a British journalist in his fifties who has been covering the French war in Viet Nam for over two years. He meets a young American idealist named Alden Pyle, who is a student of York Harding. Harding's theory is that neither Communism nor...

Words: 5177 - Pages: 21