1. Auditors were unable to verify the aircrafts claimed to have been purchased by FCB in 2005. The audit team found around RM231m of non-functional rundown aircraft in hangar. This situation leads to potential fraud bcause those old aircrafts had high price tag.Thus, it will increase the holding cost or storage cost of the assets. Then, the auditor should conduct the common test procedure which includes the examination of vendors’ invoices and receiving reports. The auditor had to perform the physical examination of those assets in order to verify the existence of the assets with the records. It is a must for every purchase to have invoice or grant to verify the purchase. Besides that, for the purchase involving high value of asset, it must have approval from top level of company which is Board of Director. In case the aircraft is non-functional rundown, it must be disposed in order to eliminate the unnecessary expenses for the company.
2. There are increasing in debtors’ confirmation letters were returned. Reasons: those debtors had changed their mailing addresses. Perhaps the company had a phantom client. So, Mr. Chuah need to confirm the account receivable whether the address is updated or real address. Besides that, the company should be using positive confirmation letters. Besides, the service agreement should be reviewed & obtain the explanation from FCB. For control procedure, the auditor needs to review periodically the account receivable trial balance especially for large and unusual receivable. Another procedure need to be implemented is adoption of allowance for doubtful debts.
3. Non-existence supporting documents involving a large sum of sale transactions which involved small clients. This is considered as potential fraud which will lead to overstatement of sale. Due to that, the company may not be able to collect all those revenues which will