Premium Essay

Flaws Of The Constitution Dbq Essay

Submitted By
Words 942
Pages 4
During the Revolutionary War the founding fathers of the United States argued and agreed upon a written document that would empower the thirteen colonies to fight against the greatest army and navy of its time, Great Britain. This document came to be known as The Articles of Confederation and it is the first written Constitution constructed by the United States Continental Congress. The objective of this document was to unify the thirteen states under one central government while retain each individual state right. After the war our founding fathers recognize huge flaws in this document that would eventually destroy the national government if not changed. One of the main flaws was the Articles lack of power to demonstrate authority over the states. Delegates from all over argued for years on if there was a need for a Constitution. Those in favor of a new Constitution, identified themselves as Federalists while those who were in favor of keeping the Articles were identified as Anti-federalists. Because of Federalists such as Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison and Anti- Federalists Patrick …show more content…
Their ideals were constructed and written in the Constitution. Federalist politicians such as Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison urged and advocated the Constitution though several letters, documents, and books made to persuade the Continental Congress, Anti-Federalist and undecided voters. These men in favor of a more unified government wrote the Federalists papers in defense of the Constitution. In these papers or articles Hamilton, Jay, and Madison argue that a stronger more unified nation is better equipped to defend its self and pay off national debts. It also argues and informs the roles of the Executive, and Legislative Branch in a unified government, and explains why the Articles of Confederation would lead to absolute failure to the

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Dbq Essay

...DBQ Essay-Ratification of the Constitution: The Federalists’ Stance The ratification of the constitution was a process which was very controversial and tedious. The people chose sides because they were undereducated about the constitution and were easily influenced. The Federalists’ supported the ratification of the constitution because the Articles of Confederation was falling apart and was causing many domestic and foreign distresses. Massachusetts was perhaps most against the new constitution but even the editor of the Massachusetts Sentinel had to agree that the A.O.C could not be. The editor writes in his newspaper of the many domestic and foreign issues facing our country. He describes them as such “… the complaints of our farmers… the complaints of every class of public creditors…the melancholy faces of our working people…our ships rotting in our harbors…the insults that are offered to the American name and character in every court of Europe…View these things fellow citizens, and then say that we do not require a new, protecting, and efficient federal government if you can.” The editor proves how deplorable the domestic issues are and how pitiful the foreign are getting. He recognizes many issues that anti-federalists overlook in hunger for power control. This editor says that these domestic and foreign issues are a result of the A.O.C and that change was required to ease the hardships the American people were facing. Even what some people consider our nation’s...

Words: 663 - Pages: 3