Premium Essay

Ford vs. General Motors

In: Other Topics

Submitted By JoelH72
Words 1376
Pages 6
Joel Harms
12/12/2013
Business Finance

Ford Vs. General Motors

I have decided to do my comparison project for my Business Finance class over Ford and General Motors Corporation. They are both car companies that are in the market of making compact, mid-sized, luxury, and SUV classes. They are similar in many ways and are also very different in many ways. General Motors was more affected by the recession of 2007 to 2009 and were part of the great bailout, where Ford was more self-supported and took care of itself without having to have any help from the bailout. I am taking information for this report from the years of 2010 to 2012 as the 2013 information is not yet out. I will start with Ford on the issue of stocks and then go into General Motors. I will try to do my best to compare them to one another and point out the highlights of both companies. First off, Ford. Ford had only 9.15% of its liabilities paid out to stockholders in 2012, which was similar to its 2011 percentage of liabilities to stockholders in 2011 with a rating of 9.2%. In 2010, only .41% of its liabilities were stockholders shares of stock. Common stock in the years 2010 to 2012 were all about the same. The balance sheet shows that anywhere from 38,000 to 40,000 were the numbers of owed common stock dividends. There was no information on Preferred Stock or Redeemable Preferred Stock so I am assuming that there were no shares of this stock available over these years for Ford. I would say that the stock percentages going from .41% to 9.15% over those three years are due to the recovery from the recession of 2007 to 2009. It shows that they have recovered well from this era of time. General Motors on the other hand over the last three years was a different story. In 2012, they had a 27.91% stockholder dividends paid out of their total liabilities. In 2011, they had…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Ford vs Dell

...Ford vs Dell Executive Summary FORDs current method of controlling all aspects of the manufacturing is outdated and is limiting the corporation’s annual results. In order to stay competitive and become efficient again, FORD needs to re-evaluate their current supply chain and implement key portions of DELLs vertically integrated supply chain model. A proper implementation will increase information flow between suppliers, departments and dealers resulting in a reduction of redundant inventory and focus towards just in time inventory. All of these factors will further drive up the already US industry leading profit margin per vehicle. In order to accomplish these goals FORD needs to refocus the Purchasing department’s responsibilities, consolidate and develop suppliers that deliver finished high level components and increase the information flow across all points of the supply chain. These steps will help to introduce a more pull-based system.   Contents Issue identification 1 Environmental and root cause analysis 2 Alternatives/Options 3 Recommendations 4 Implementation 5 Monitor & Control 6 Issue identification • Current order to delivery (OTD) is more than 60 days. • Management of large supplier network. • Utilization of IT is lacking. • Purchasing isn’t integrated into Product development. • Independent dealership network has resulted in FORDs loss of control over customer service experiences. This network......

Words: 410 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Annotated Bibliography

...Ford and GM serious issues pre, during and post TARP period Keller Graduate School of Management Ford and GM serious issues pre, during and post TARP period Annotated Bibliography Burrows, Dan (2014) Stock Showdown: Ford vs. GM stock. Retrieved September 9, 2014 http://investorplace.com/2014/07/ford-stock-gm-stock-earnings-recall/ Ford and General Motors earnings show strong businesses but stocks are not equal as investments. The two companies have different risk profiles and prospects. Flint, Jerry. Forbes. 3/1/2010, Could Ford overtake GM? Vol. 185 Issue 3, p34-34. 1p. Written to show the comparisons of the two companies. These two companies are extremely different yet have many similarities that are detailed. Ford vs. GM: Who’s the Best in Detroit? (2010). Market Beat Retrieved from http://blogs.wsj.com/marketbeat/2010/12/22/ford-vs-gm-whos-the-best-in-detroit-analyst-asks/ Compares Ford and GM across eight different categories.GM is given the advantage in the market share in developing markets. Hoffman, Bryce G. (2013). American Icon: Alan Mulally and the Fight to Save Ford Motor Company. Ford was under the leadership of CEO Alan Mulally and they had an epic turnaround. Congress offered all three Detroit automakers a bailout. Ingrassia, Paul (2012) Engines of Change: A History of the American Dream in Fifteen Cars. Simon & Schuster. Provides details on how cars......

Words: 493 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Toyota vs. Ford

...Ford vs Toyota Ford Motor Company is the second-largest automobile company in the world. Ford's main focus is automobiles; however, they also operate in Ford Credit and Hertz Corporation. Ford also has controlling interest in Mazda Motor Corporation. Ford was established June, 1903; in an old wagon factory in Detroit Michigan. In 1903, Ford began production on a two-cylinder, 8 horsepower called the Model A. They produced a total of 1,708 of these cars in their first year of operation. Toyota Motor Corporation was Japan's largest car company. Toyota ranked the world's third largest by the year 2000. The company could produce near five million car units annually in the 1990s and controlled approximately 10 percent of the global market. Toyota was founded by a man named Kiichiro Toyoda in 1933. He did not produce his first car until 1935. By this time General Motors and Ford were already operating in Japan. Both companies are manufactures of cars which are sold in the United States. One is made in Japan and the other in the United States. They are both a financially well because of the popularity of their cars. The accounting criteria's that they both face are different because of the foreign rules and regulations. Both companies are faced with their own set of rules that have to be followed, but Toyota is faced with more issues since they sell their cars in the United States How does a U.S. company differ from a foreign company? What reporting regulations are different or the...

Words: 314 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Upload

...2013 Chevrolet Volt The 2013 Chevrolet Volt is a plug in hybrid vehicle that is manufactured by the GM (General Motors). It uses electric batteries and the motors to power the wheels and it’s combined with a gas engine that gives off power when the battery is low. The gas power allows you to travel hundreds of additional miles. The Volt makes driving smooth, quiet and easy to use. Some features in this vehicle is, it comes with a 120-volt portable charge cord, has 17̎ 5-spoke painted aluminum wheels and, a remote vehicle started system. The Chevrolet Volt has won numerous awards such as the 2009 Green Car Vision Award, 2011 Green Car of the Year, 2011 North American Car of the Year, 2011 World Green Car and 2012 European Car of the Year. The Volt is still the best eco-vehicle in the world. Features Compared to other vehicles, the volt has better features, safety systems and many more. This chart shows the comparison between the features of 2013 Chevrolet Volt and 2013 Ford C-Max Energi 5dr HB SEL. 2013 Chevrolet Volt vs. 2013 Ford C-Max Energi 5dr HB SEL. | Features | 2013 Chevrolet Volt | 2013 Ford C-Max Energi 5dr HB SEL. | Standard Engine | Gas/Electric I4 | Gas/Electric I4 | Drivetrain | Front wheel drive | Front Wheel Drive | Fuel Injection | Electronic Fuel Injection | Electronic Fuel Injection | 4-Wheel ABS | Standard | Standard | 4- wheel Disc Brakes | Standard | Standard | Cloth Seats | Standard | Not Available | Leather Wrapped Steering Wheel...

Words: 535 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Ford Pinto

...Ford Pinto Case Study MGT/216 November 11, 2010 Executive Summary In the1960's, the American small-car industry had strong competition for Ford, Volkswagen and several Japanese companies. In order to battle their challengers, Ford expedited its most contemporary automobile, the Pinto, into manufacturing. Fabrication was completed in a smaller extent of time than is generally mandatory to generate an automobile. The expected time to produce a vehicle is forty-three months however Ford took no more than twenty- five months (Trevino & Nelson, 2007). While Ford had the opportunity to produce a new model that would decline the risk of the Ford Pinto from blowing up, the corporation selected not to execute the plan. This design expense would have a rate of $11 for each vehicle. A study demonstrated the innovative plan would have resulted in a reduced amount of 180 casualties. The corporation argued that they had utilized the traditional risk-benefit tests to decide if the financial expense of adjusting the modifications were larger than society’s shared benefit (Safety X Change, 2009). Ford relied on the figures; the cost would have been $137 million vs. the $49.5 million; a printed fee placed on the vehicle for damages, casualties and injuries. Three adolescent girls passed away in a 1973 Ford Pinto on August 10, 1978, after being impacted from the back by a driver in a small truck (University of Phoenix, 2007). The Ford Pinto was totally immersed in fire and the......

Words: 989 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Marketing Strategy

...Equity Research 22 September 2014 US Automakers See Attractively Deep Value in GM As We Roll Out 2016 Estimates for US Automakers; Like Ford; Cautious on TSLA We introduce our 2016 estimates and roll-forward valuation for GM and Ford, finding +50% upside in the case of General Motors and +32% in the case of Ford. Our established 2015 price targets increase on newly considered 2016 earnings rather than 2015 in our valuation analysis and on capital structure roll-forward as the firms generate sizable cash flow. 2016 earnings are expected to rise relative to 2015, on industry tailwinds (continued trend toward more normal volumes in Europe, cycling past a period of atypically strong macro headwinds in South America, robust growth in China, and continued cyclical increase in North America even if at a lesser rate) as well as various different self-help initiatives (e.g., as restructurings in Europe, Australia, and elsewhere take further hold, and on cost control efforts in North America). We reiterate our Overweight ratings on both GM and Ford, seeing more value in automaker stocks than in supplier stocks generally, on earnings that are growing almost as quickly as the average supplier over our newly extended forecast window (and at least as structurally improved relative to history) but valuation which is only in line with historical average (Ford) or even significantly below (GM). We are more cautious on Tesla, however, with our Neutral rating balancing incremental news......

Words: 24575 - Pages: 99

Premium Essay

Finance Project

...Principles of Finance Final Project General Motors Company vs Ford Motor Company Lauren Grippo GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION (COMPANY) General Motors Corporation (General Motors or GM) was incorporated on August 11, 2009. Also known as GM, the company designs, builds and sells cars, trucks and automobiles parts globally and headquartered in Detroit, Michigan. The company also provides automotive financing services through General Motors Financial Company, Inc. (GM Financial). The company designs, manufactures and markets vehicles under the brands of Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet and GMC. Along with our strategic partners, we produce cars and trucks, and sell and service our vehicles, through the following brands: Chevrolet, Buick, GMC, Cadillac, Baojun, Holden, Isuzu, Jiefang, Opel, Vauxhall and Wuling (GM.com). In addition to the products the company also sells to its dealers for consumer retail sales, to fleet customers, including daily rental car companies, commercial and leasing companies and governments. As of December 31, 2012, the Company offered 21 FlexFuel vehicles in the United States and offered 12 hybrid models and continues to develop plug-in hybrid electric vehicle technology. They are also subsidiary owners of the OnStar, LLC servicing the United States and Canada. OnStar is a provider of connected safety, security and mobility solutions and advanced information technology. FORD MOTOR COMPANY The Ford Motor Company (also known as Ford) is an American......

Words: 3240 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Boiled Frog Phenomenon

...the “boiled frog” phenomenon are GM, Ford and Chrysler vs. Toyota. Back in 2008, Toyota, a Japanese auto manufacturer, outperformed General Motors who was in first place in the auto industry. General Motors has been known as making good trucks and SUVs but very lousy on cars. In 2009, GM and Chrysler went through bankruptcy because they failed to make good cars and because of bad management, like the frog, they became too comfortable. Ford Motors was also in bad shape and tried to get credit from the government aid fund, but managed to survive without the bail-out funds. Today, the big three or the Detroit three, are back into business after they learned their lesson, they have become competitive and profitable in the small and the midsize car market. They are trying to cut their labor costs down and they are building cars people want to buy (Bennett, 2013). What could the business have done to avoid the effects of the phenomenon? Like the David textbook suggests, GM, Chrysler and Ford should have been aware of any competitors in the same auto industry and identify what they can do to compete with them. For example, Toyota was making affordable cars that people liked, so they went to the competitor to buy what they had. Getting and being in competitive advantage is the first key to surviving globally. One question the Detroit three needed to ask was, what strategy should they follow to beat their rival? If GM, Chrysler and Ford Motor Co. perceived they needed to have......

Words: 938 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Toyota the Rise of a Global Corporation

...09 10 12 13 2 SUMMARY Background Toyota is a multinational automobile manufacturing corporation headquartered in Japan. The company was founded by Kiichiro Toyoda in 1937 as a spin-off from his father's company Toyota Industries to create automobiles. In its inception Toyota manufactured cars through mass production system. Mass production system was developed by Henry Ford found of Ford Motor Co. At that Time Mass production system was considered the most ideal method for manufacturing cars, but Taiichi Ohno a production engineer found some flaws in the method. So, he tried to introduce some changes in this method. The method he established was later known as lean production system. Since its development Lean production system has always worked as the competitive advantage for Toyota for making quality cars for a very affordable price. What started in 1937 with a single plant has now become an enormous company with 52 plants in 26 countries. In the financial year ending March 2007 it earned $11 billion net profits on sales of $152 billion. By some measures it also surpassed General Motors to become the largest automobile company in the world. Toyota’s core business is the manufacture and sale of automobiles. A successful company they have a presence in more than 170 countries. However the vehicle industry as a whole faced with a huge threat to its survival. Oil accounted for 95% of global energy used for transportation also other factors including energy security,...

Words: 4569 - Pages: 19

Free Essay

Business Law

...disclaiming implied warranties are: “As-Is” Disclaimer - The contract language must state “as-is, with all faults” or other language that make it clear to the buyer there are no implied warranties. “Disclaimer of the Implied Warranty of Merchantability” – The contract must specifically mention the term merchantability to be disclaimed. The disclaimer may be oral or written. “Disclaimer of the Implied Warranty of Fitness for a Particular Purpose” – If the “as-is” disclaimer is not used, the implied warranty of fitness for a particular fitness may be disclaimed in general language and must be in writing. This must be in writing. In the case Denny vs. Ford Motor Company Nancy Denny was awarded a $1.2 million in damages because the court stated that Denny bought the vehicle for normal on road usage and had no intentions of using the vehicle for the off road usage that Ford Motor Company claimed it was supposed to be used for and Ford Motor Company did not state that the vehicle was for off road use only. The law states that a product must reasonably fit the purpose for which it is marketed for purchase. If Mr. Smith files suit against the dealer for breach of warranty, I think the buyer will have a good case. But Mr. Smith also has a better case against the manufacturer of the vehicle since it was a new vehicle standards must be meet and records maintained. If the dealer discusses the contract language, the court will state the contract cannot disclaim personal injury and the......

Words: 634 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Assignment 3 - Business Level & Corporate Level Strategies - Ford Motor Company

...Business-Level and Corporate-Level Strategies – Ford Motor Company Strayer University BUS499, 14 February 2016 Business-Level and Corporate-Level Strategies – Ford Motor Company It all began in 1896 when Henry Ford built the Quadricycle that rode on four bicycle wheels, operated by a four-horsepower engine with only two forward gears and no reverse ability. Henry soon joined a group that founded the Detroit Automobile Company but left within one year and would soon incorporate the Ford Motor Company with 12 investors and 1,000 shares in 1903. The Ford Model A was the first car sold on July 23, 1903 (http://www.corporate.ford.com). Ford Motor Company has endured many challenges during its 113 years in business. Altering business strategies and staying competitive have not been easy against other car companies, however they have overcome and are focusing on the One Ford Plan (One Team, One Plan, and One Goal) and their vision for future success. 1. Business Level Strategy The business level strategy deployed by Ford Motors is the cost leadership strategy, which puts emphasis on operating at lower costs, but not essentially offering the lowest prices in the market (Haines 2004). Therefore, a firm can use such a position to reduce its prices in order to increase its market share or maintain the current prices and increase its revenue per unit items compared to its competitors. The principal idea of the low cost strategy is that cost and prices are not dependent, and......

Words: 2079 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Total Recall

...Transcript * 1. TOYOTA MOTOR MANUFACTURING INC. U.S.A Prepared By – Ashwin Mehta – 313 Pratik Mehta – 314 Ishaan Parekh – 315 Ankit shah – 317 Dishank Shah – 318 Fenil Shah - 319 * 2. Agenda Current Scenario Problems Faced Analysis Suggestions and recommendations Risks and contingencies * 3. Current Scenario • Toyota Motors Manufacturing (TMM) faces increasing problems with its seat supply. • Kentucky Framed Seat (KFS), is a single seat supplier for TMM. • KFS is responsible for the material flaws and missing parts as the major encountered defects. • These problems are increasingly occurring with an increase in varieties and demand for the seats. * 4. Problems Faced • Product proliferation problems with defective seats. • Company’s deviation from its normal production plan and lack of a recovery system. • Run ratio dropped from 95% to 85%. • This means 45 less cars were being produced per shift. • This translated in overtime of workers. • Too many cars needed off-line operations of one type or the another before they could go on shipping. * 5. Questions Raised • Will the sales company get cars on time as promised? • What does it mean to implement JIT and Jidoka principles to this situation? • Is TMM handling seat defects correctly on the line? • Is the current routine for handling seat-defect cars really a legitimate exception to TPS, or could it be a dangerous deviation from TPS? • Is there a way to kaizen TMM’s off-line routine? * 6.......

Words: 3548 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

Writing Assignment: Financial Analysis

... Henry Ford incorporated Ford Motor Company in 1903 at Dearborn, Michigan, USA and is known to have adapted practices that were not popular in those days. The Car Maker is known for their famous “Model T” and the unique innovation of interchangeable parts in moving assembly lines that makes it possible to assemble cars at low cost and high reliability. Ford Motor established an impressive financial track record almost throughout the 20th Century (barring the record loss of $7 billion in 1992) till the Millennium started (Alan Mullally, 2012). Ford motor Company is the second largest automobile company in the world representing a $164 billion multinational empire. Ford is primarily known as a manufacturer of cars and trucks but also operates Ford Motor Credit Company which generates over 3 billion in revenues. Ford also owns The Hertz Corporation which is the largest car rental company in the world. Ford has vehicles under the name of Ford, Lincoln, Mercury, Jaguar, Volvo, Land Rover, Aston Martin, and has a controlling interest in Mazda Motor Corporation. Ford Motor Company incurred a financial loss of about 5.45 billion dollars in 2001 and never really recovered confidently after this slump. It is said that the Ford 2000 initiative of Lord Alex Trotman was the primary reason for financial downturn of Ford Motor Company. The failure of Lord Trotman’s Ford 2000 strategy was primarily due to the vision of......

Words: 3215 - Pages: 13

Free Essay

Fordism

...Fordism and Taylorism are responsible for the early success and recent decline of the U.S. motor vehicle industry Ronald Jean Degan International School of Management Paris 2011 Working paper nº 81/2011 globADVANTAGE Center of Research in International Business & Strategy INDEA - Campus 5 Rua das Olhalvas Instituto Politécnico de Leiria 2414 - 016 Leiria PORTUGAL Tel. (+351) 244 845 051 Fax. (+351) 244 845 059 E-mail: globadvantage@ipleiria.pt Webpage: www.globadvantage.ipleiria.pt WORKING PAPER Nº 81/2011 Setembro 2011 Com o apoio 2 Fordism and Taylorism are responsible for the early success and recent decline of the U.S. motor vehicle industry Ronald Jean Degen Ph.D. Candidate at the International School of Management Paris Vice Chairman of Masisa Chile Address: E-mail: rjdegen@gmail.com Phone: +55 21 8068 9000 Av. Pasteur 333 Botafogo/Urca Lancha Ovelha Negra Iate Clube do Rio de Janeiro 22290-240 Rio de Janeiro, RJ Brazil 3 Fordism and Taylorism are responsible for the early success and recent decline of the U.S. motor vehicle industry Abstract This paper identifies the ways in which the ideas of Fordism and Taylorism have been responsible for the success of the U.S. motor vehicle companies until 1955, and for their subsequent decline. On three occasions, the motor vehicle industry has changed the fundamental ideas on the process of manufacturing, and, perhaps more significantly, on how humans work together to create value. Under......

Words: 8511 - Pages: 35

Premium Essay

Cyclical Rise and Fall of Gm

...rebirth of GM in 2009 and subsequent successful years since. | Recently in the news there has been an alarming fact about General Motors automobile products that have caused a loss of property and more importantly loss of lives, while most admit a simple design flaw could’ve been repaired with a $0.57 switch (foxnews.com, 2014, 1 Apr). This paper will touch on the history of GM dating back to 1899 with a history of a boom and bust cycle all the way up to the collapse, the rebirth of GM in 2009 and subsequent successful years since. The History of General Motors Corporation, the one-time “largest automaker in the world” had its start in 1899. At that time over one thousand companies attempted to improve the “horse drawn carriage” to that of an automobile and failed. William Crapo Durant was in the horse carriage business in Flint Michigan since 1886, selling over 75,000 in 1895. In 1904 Durant bought into the Buick Motor company where many other auto makers had operations in Flint, MI; Chrysler, Buick, Nash to name a few. The economic downturn of 1907 bankrupted many of the smaller auto manufacturers and to protect the company, Durant sought out Henry Ford and Ransom Olds to discuss a possible merger. Both declined due to Durant’s lack of capital (Durant, 2004, p 71-73). Durant, instead of a merger, bought several smaller companies and founded General Motors on 16 September, 1908. By 1910 the company owned 20% of the American auto industry by purchasing smaller......

Words: 1149 - Pages: 5