Free Essay

Foreign Policy

In: Social Issues

Submitted By petrovich
Words 2005
Pages 9
Growth and development of foreign policy
Name

Institution

Date

There have been vast changes and developments in the foreign policy agenda that have seen Kenya as a country, transition through many regimes that had their individual differences since independence. Since the attainment of independence, Kenya has had fairly smooth international and regional relations that have been ensured by the various statutes and values put in place to make sure that Kenya grows in all dimensions, economically, socially, politically plus other aspects that are cupped under the bigger ones mentioned above. In the current global space we are in today that is so competitive and complex, strategies have to be put up that promote the many interests of Kenya. It should be noted that since independence Kenya has had four sitting presidents including the current one, this has a close relationship of the way the foreign policy agenda has revolutionized.
It will be noted that since independence Kenya had quiet diplomacy that can be considered to have been of a low profile approach in terms of foreign affairs especially international ones. In this immediate post-independence period there was active involvement in regional peace diplomacy. The architectures of these polices then had the central idea that the future of the country strongly stood on the belief that regional stability and security in our environment is the basis for national prosperity and survival. Therefore, there was need to realign the international relations with global powers relations since then and also now there was as is still emergence of multi polar world order and economies that greatly influence global affairs.
Kenya being a central and integral entity in the African continent, it is intrinsically important that its national interests are fundamentally interlinked with the continents stability, unity and prosperity. On this note, the foreign policy makers have placed great emphasis on collaboration cooperation and setting up links. All this have ensured beneficial bilateral and multilateral ties and relation with the rest of the world. These mutual relations that run from west to east are set in order to secure the social and economic priorities of the country.
Initially at the onset of independence, there was an attempt to unite the three east African countries, Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda lead to the formation of East African Common Services Organization (EACSO). The organization aimed at creating a common currency, a common market for goods and a common court for the three countries that would be controlled by a centralized administration to provide transportation, communication, tax collection, social services, university education and scientific research. However, these plans were not realized due to individual divergence in economy and nationalism, this was in 1965. Then again in the wake of 1967 a new organization was formed this was the East African Community (EAC). This was under the treaty for East African Cooperation. The EAC was marred by multiple challenges some of which were Tanzania’s shift to socialism and then Uganda was under the dictatorial rule of Idi Amin. This led to the dissolution of the community in 1983. Later in 1993 another cooperation was formed by the then three respective presidents East African Cooperation (EAC). All of these formations have been the products of policies that have been structured under certain guidelines. These guidelines are the objectives and principles of the foreign policy. The Kenya’s foreign policy objectives are: 1. Protect Kenya’s sovereignty and territorial integrity; 2. Enhance partnership with the Kenya Diaspora and descendants; 3. Advance the economic prosperity of Kenya and her people; 4. Promote and protect the interests of Kenyans abroad; 5. Enhance regional and global peace and security; 6. Project Kenya’s image and prestige; 7. Promote international cooperation and multilateralism; and 8. Promote sub-regional and regional integration and co-operation.
Under these objectives there have been pillars that have anchored the formulation of the Kenyan foreign policy on the wake of global emerging issues like international terrorism that has become a global security threat and climate change (global warming). These factors have specifically lead to the changes and more integration of international relations and also the elevation of the environmental agenda as one of the pillars of foreign policy.
Another major factor that led to a major policy transition is the expansion of the space for regional and continental diplomacy. It was in 2002 under the reawakening of the African union that saw the creation of structures like the AU peace and Security that have helped to stabilize regional conflicts and Kenya has played a leading role in providing troops and aid especially in the upper north of Africa, Somalia and Sudan. Through this, the relations of Kenya and other African countries have been peacefully diplomatic hence the peace diplomacy pillar of the Kenya foreign policy. Similarly on this peace pillar Kenya became a member of numerous regional institutions like the East African Community (EAC), Inter Government Authority on Development (IGAD), Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA) and the African Union whose aim is to ensure peace in Africa.
After independence there arose domestic and regional differences that almost tore the country apart as there were ideologists who had the view that Kenya should moderately forge through a cost benefit dimension and others who reasoned that liberation and idealism was a better way. Initially the international system was bi-polar and there were questions on which side Kenya would lean on in this system. The moderates viewed that leaning in the west presented a better chance while the more radical side had a different opinion so they preferred both the east and the west. Notably, this two opposing sides were in government, so there was looming crisis between 1963 and 1967. Hence, parliament passed a document in 1965, Sessional paper No.10. Titled African Socialism and its Application to Kenya passed by the legistrature. This document to date put Kenya on the capitalist side therefore aligning to the west. This document was on a greater scale championed by the moderate camp headed by the then president Kenyatta and Mboya. This gravely angered the radicals, the likes of Odinga and Oneko. At this period also there were was a lot of political heat in east Africa at large, Tanzania had united with Zanzibar, there was a coup in Uganda, crisis in Congo that Kenyatta had tried to help solve but failed and still Kenya had its own problems to take care of like the shifta war and the mutiny of some soldiers made Kenyatta rise to the occasion. At this time Britain was the only foreign ally affiliated with Kenya and Kenyatta badly needed her support and on the same instance Britain wanted her interests protected in Kenya. Just to briefly mention, there was another problem that led to the initial development of the foreign policy in Kenya in both regional and international relations. The ‘shifta’ war in the north eastern district of Kenya had insurgents from Somalia had a plan to foment discord in countries that had a vast Somali population like Ethiopia and Kenya. Notably, Somalia had attained independence three years earlier. So, in combating a common enemy Kenya and Ethiopia had a pact that hold up to today to share troops, since the Kenya military was weak and Britain also came in handy in training soldiers and also in helping out in the war. Another factor that forcefully made this countries unite and seek western powers reinforcement was that the USSR was supporting Somalia. Therefore, today Kenya holds that territorial integrity is core to its foreign policy.
The rivalry that ensued between Kenyatta and Odinga also had a great impact on the direction that Kenya foreign policy took since it had a lot to do with major ideologies that were meant to shape the then amorphous structure of the country. Odinga and his allies-the radical lot, who were pro-communism were viewed by Kenyatta as potential threats to his presidency. The radicals had the view that after independence, the entities that would be left behind by the whites would unanimously be handed over to the Africans, the land, the factories, the shops, buildings virtually everything. They thought that idealism would run the country, a system that Kenyatta was opposed to. So Kenyatta had to seek closer ties with the west that any other side since at least he and them had mutual interests.
Kenya’s relation with the West since 2002 has been jolty as the new Kibaki administration that took power was keen on expanding international partners. In the earlier past the Kenyan administration had majorly ventured in the West and the cooperation was quite smooth. However in 2002, Kenya sought out China which has a policy of not conflating human rights with other foreign policy. This saw china to be a productive associate and since the Kibaki assumption to power we saw great infrastructure development that was in partnership with the Chinese government. The jettisoning of the western relations that in a way interfered with internal running of the government was now stopped. This interference was one of the reasons that led to the birth of change in resolution of Kenya’s foreign policy in the structure of international system. A major factor that facilitated Kenya’s fallout from the America’s human rights crusade is that, that crusade bore the meddling of internal affairs of other states by the US in a bid to democratize the world thus china having a relativist stand on human rights was a safe haven for Kenya and since then the over reliance of Kenya on the US for aid considerably ceased. With that happening, the foreign policy shifted from the west to the east. This slow by slow shift of to the east may be viewed as the early competition between the US and the Communists just that this time it is the Chinese who are posing this threat. Moreover since the millennia the foreign policy has considerably majored on international economics.
Another pillar that has greatly influenced the change and development of Kenya’s foreign policy is the diaspora diplomacy. In the yester years very little or zero action was being taken to incorporate the people living in the diaspora in the national development agenda. It has majorly been geared on the development agenda. It seeks to harness the potential of people living abroad to tap to their skills and resources for national developments. A pillar that has been greatly championed by the immediate government.
What then can we say of the Kenyan foreign policy, is it norm driven or is it based on the practical approach of theories that have been tried before? Initially Kenya was virtually not inclined to any superpower at the heat of the cold war but later a short period after that, there were delegations to the United Soviets Socialist Union to facilitate aid agreement and foster trade while at the same time British projects were going on in Kenya. This double dealing can be traced up to today where Kenya has partnerships with both the west and the east. It may be noted therefore, that the Kenyan foreign policy was geared at ensuring that the interests of the country were laid and where there was economic and political gain regardless of what the norms stipulated. The Kenya’s foreign policy is also greatly informed by Kenya vision 2030, ideologies of the ruling parties, sessional papers and circulars. It should be noted that since independence regimes have also been a driving factor of the foreign policy but the immediate post-colonial era was a major determinant. Foreign policy direction has played a vital role in shaping the economy and political field of Kenya. This international cooperation has also boosted the way other foreign investors engage Kenya in world business for example in the recent past the World Trade Organization summit was held in Nairobi- Kenya, this is an indication that the foreign policy in universally congruent to the international system.

References
Howell J (1968). The journal of modern African Studies. Cambridge University Press

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Foreign Policy

...of US Foreign Policy: An Overview Hang Thi Thuy Nguyen1 1 The Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Australia Correspondence: Hang Thi Thuy Nguyen, School of Global, Urban and Social Science, The Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Australia. E-mail: thuyhang032003@gmail.com Received: July 27, 2013 doi:10.5430/wjss.v1n1p20 Accepted: August 12, 2013 Online Published: August 13, 2013 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/wjss.v1n1p20 Abstract This article reviews major theoretical perspectives to US foreign policy as well as on how these theoretical perspectives explain foreign policy decision making and conducting of the US. First, the paper will discuss the process of making foreign policy to sustain US core values and interests which are determined by five major categories of sources (i) the external environment, (ii) the societal environment of the nation, (iii) the governmental setting, (iv) the roles of foreign policymakers, and (v) the individual personalities of foreign policy-making elites (Wittkopf et al 2008, p. 15). Then, the paper will examine the defensive and offensive realism, liberalism, marxism, neoclassical realism, constructivism which can be based on to understand US foreign policy behaviour. It will be concluded that no single theory has the capacity to describe, explain and predict US foreign policy behaviour. A mixture of such theoretical approaches seems to be necessary to obtain a comprehensive picture of US......

Words: 4904 - Pages: 20

Free Essay

Foreign Policy

...Dumisani Yambira 1147585 8/12/2015 [Type the company name] user President Zuma`s letdown approach to deliver a sound foreign policy indicates a failure. Factors of negligence and corruption within top officials have put the South African foreign policy brand into shame on the International relations platform. The failure to observe the policies on the Government White paper associates the current Administration with incompetency. The vocal tone of discontentment by the social forces indicate the State`s inability to perform the policies outlined on the Government`s diplomacy of Ubuntu. South Africa`s role in the COP17 indicates the State`s incoherence on their foreign policy. President Zuma`s Administration did not live to the expectations of the International community and of the locals. The conference expected South Africa to take the lead on the promotion of green technology and encourage renewable sources like wind as outlined on the website of (South African Government White Paper on Foreign Policy 2011). To great disappointment, scholar (Watson n.d.) observed that little support is given to these sources. In 2011, the public campaign of “One million Climate Jobs” demanded for the State to use electricity from wind and solar power (Austin-Evelyn 2011). However the negligence highlight the Foreign Policy`s failure to lure in investors on the climate change program and promote community empowerment. This presents the Government’s failure to meet the demands of......

Words: 2187 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Us Foreign Policy

...US Foreign Policy The officially stated aims of the foreign policy of the United States, as declared by the United States Department of State and United States Agency for International Department is “to create a more secure, democratic, and prosperous world for the benefit of the American people and the international community.” Moreover, the United States House Committee on Foreign Affairs states as some of its jurisdictional goals: "export controls, including nonproliferation of nuclear technology and nuclear hardware; measures to foster commercial intercourse with foreign nations and to safeguard American business abroad; International commodity agreements; international education; and protection of American citizens abroad and expatriation." So through all this, what Americans are trying to say is that they want to make the world a better place but not without putting their interests first. Therefore, I believe that this policy is far from being great as they want it to be. One of the main issues is that the presidency is overburdened and more than that has too much authority. Presidents have not only foreign policy responsibilities, but sizeable domestic duties too. In addition, the presidency is the head of a political party. As a result, it is tough for one person to manage disparate tasks and more than that, it gives him the opportunity and the advantage of imposing his own views in a subtle way. As well as that, presidents may lack experience.......

Words: 816 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The History of Usa Foreign Policy

...twentieth century, United States foreign policy would begin to take a decisive turn, which would ultimately catapult and establish the country as one of the great world powers, in addition to setting a standard of future international engagement throughout the twentieth century. Prior to 1896, the United States had a largely none interventionist and insular approach when it came to foreign policy and international relations. While there were moments of engagement up to this time, coupled with watershed foreign policy directives (such as the Monroe Doctrine and its subsequent application), the United States had a tendency to mind its own business and only get involved in global politics when events threatened to directly affect the country's security. All this, though, would change by the late 1890's. When William McKinley took the office of president in 1897, a gradual change in the mindset of the United States populace, which had been fermenting since the end of the Civil War, was about to reach it's realization. While there were still many voices which supported inward looking policy and a non-involvement stance when it came to the international arena, the pendulum had swung toward a populace which viewed itself and it's country with a great sense of pride and self-importance, which would soon be exercised. When rebellion against Spanish rule again flared up in Cuba in 1895 (largely due to the detrimental economic effects of US tariff policies concerning imported Cuban......

Words: 317 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Domestic Determinants of Foreign Policy

...The impact of domestic determinants on foreign policy has long been a widely debated topic in the field of international relations, and foreign policy analysis in particular. Some scholars argue that domestic politics and foreign policy are two independent arenas of issues. Others believe that the two respective issues do not stop at the water’s edge. Foreign policy and domestic politics are interdependent and could spill over into each other. While both schools of scholars make some convincing arguments about their respective cases, it’s probably reasonable to expect that the degree of influence between domestic and international determinants of foreign policy is contingent on different foreign policy contexts. In some cases, international factors play a more important role, whereas in other cases, domestic reasons are more important. In this presentation, I put forth a conglomeration and an intellectual web analysis in examining the domestic determinants of national foreign policy. Prior to reaching this goal a definition offered by Webber and smith in 2000 on foreign policy is stipulated. The interpretation of domestic determinants as illustrated by Sulliban is furthermore encapsulated. According to Webber and Smith, A country's foreign policy, also called the international relations policy, is a set of goals outlining how the country will interact with other countries economically, politically, socially and militarily, and to a lesser extent, how the country......

Words: 3397 - Pages: 14

Free Essay

Neoconservative Foreign Policy

...Term Paper Spring 2012 The neoconservative model for foreign policy has always been based on a desire to spread the gift of democracy to other nations so that they too may enjoy the fruits that democracy and free markets bear. Going a step further, Robert Kagan presents the neoconservative belief that ‘the great spread of democracy, the prosperity, and the prolonged great power peace- have depended directly and indirectly on power and influence exercised by the United States.’ To ensure that this is the case, the Bush doctrine was created to preemptively strike countries in order to prevent a conflict further down the road. While it may be true that the developing world has directly and indirectly been affected by United States influence, the United States isn’t the sole arbiter of prosperity around the globe and its purpose for influence shouldn’t be mistaken for ‘spreading democracy’ but rather the neoconservative desire to leverage influence for economic and political gain. While much of this had previously been achieved through unofficial intervention and covert operations, the Bush doctrine represented a significant departure in that it used preemptive strike as a forerunning option in preventing potential future wars. While Robert Kagan's quote reflects the ideal interpretation of the neoconservative model in that it ‘spreads democracy,’ history has shown its intent to much more in the self interest of the United States relative to that of the host country in......

Words: 1683 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Foreign Policy Doctrine

...Proposed Presidential Foreign Policy Doctrine Template 2015-2016 The presidents administration’s primary foreign policy goal, that I am bestowing as the, Obama Super Ultra Conservative Selective Policy; (OSUCSP), will focus on four key areas. Considering the current administrations policy is based on preserving ideals from a “liberal internationals approach” (McCormick 213) “The Obama-Biden foreign policy will end the war in Iraq responsibly, finish the fight against the Taliban and al Qaeda in Afghanistan, secure nuclear weapons and loose nuclear materials from terrorists, and renew American diplomacy to support strong alliances and to seek a lasting peace in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.” (The Obama-Biden Plan) The foreign policy...

Words: 930 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Do You Agree with the View That Henry Viii Foreign Policy Should Be Seen as a Costly Failure?

...Do you agree with the view that Henry VIII foreign policy should be seen as a costly failure? It can be agreed that Henry VIII and Wolsey’s foreign policy was an expensive failure to a large extent, but there is some evidence from the sources showing otherwise and demonstrating some success. Sources 1, 2 and 3 all support the source to a certain extent, some more than others, however Sources 1 and 3 also disagree with the question and show some successes to Henry and Wolsey’s policy. Despite this, the idea of their policy being expensive is consistent throughout the sources for costing over a years income for Henry. Henry VIII and Wolsey’s foreign policy can be seen as an expensive failure as shown in all three of the sources. Sources 1, 2 and 3 all refer to the king’s expenses in one way and having not gained much from it. In source 2, it refers to the King as receiving ‘no more land in France’ on top of what his father had already gained, whilst costing the King an ‘infinite sum of money’ demonstrating that Henry had not had much success in his reign but had still spending extreme figures. Using this source, along with our own knowledge we know that Henry failed in securing the French crown for himself as well as the partition of France to himself, Charles and Bourbon, after the Battle of Pavia in 1525. Alongside this, the failures of Henry’s campaign during the war with France including the evaporation of Wolsey and Henry’s passing enthusiasm for another......

Words: 495 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

How Far Was an Effective Foreign Policy the Key to Stability During the Reign of Henry Vii?

...The success of a 15th or 16th century monarch can often be broken down and assessed by their actions regarding foreign policy. A judgement has to be made by the interpretation of the word “effective” in context. Foreign policy is arguably the key to stability or the making of an unsuccessful king. This coupled with the amount of foreign enemies, unsuccessful battles, and level of profit accumulated in relation to the cost of battle among others are some of the factors that resulted in a kings reputation being formulated. Henry VII as a monarch has a reputation of rebuild and restructure in regards to foreign policy and kingship, but the extent to which foreign policy is the key to stability can be assessed. Known as the ‘auld alliance’, reputation with France had shaped the support among the population of monarchs for years upon years. Henry VII was seen to be in a legacy of debt to the French king after he has supported Henry Tudors claim to the throne. In previous years control of France had made the reputation of the king but this time it could be seen as the ultimate controlling factor. Immediately this was seen to act as a stabilising factor, this left the English king in a position of comfort knowing that a positive relationship with France has already been achieved and did not have to be forced. However, in 1482 Henry was seen to send troops to support Anne, the Duchess of Brittany against France. Although this action was not one of aggression, and certainly didn’t......

Words: 2276 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Foreign Policy Must Be Formulated in Accordance with the National Interest’. Evaluate This Claim Which Is Attributable to Realist Thinking on Foreign Policy.

...Foreign Policy Module Summative Assessment Question 1: Foreign policy must be formulated in accordance with the national interest’. Evaluate this claim which is attributable to realist thinking on foreign policy. * * According to realist thinking on foreign policy, international relations and politics are formulated in accordance with national interest. This presupposes that the key actors in International Relations are sovereign states that behave similarly regardless of their type of government. As well, a state of anarchy is at the fundamental core of this argument and national interests of egoistic states as the main outward presence in international realm. Classic Realism, originally emerged from the European concert of aristocratic diplomacy. By evaluating this claim, this essay will reassert the position and importance of Offensive and Defensive Realism in our contemporary post 9/11 world. These are respectively neoclassical realism and neorealism. Firstly, a detailed account of realism will be produced highlighting the emergence of national interest as the fundamental feature or goal of sovereign states. This is done either through the maintenance of a status quo or aspiration of accumulating influence. It will be concluded that Defensive Realism or neorealism is the principal theoretical sub-school in according this claim any legitimacy. Secondly, a general evaluation of neorealism in post 9/11 world will be provided; and a comparison, and ultimately an...

Words: 4135 - Pages: 17

Free Essay

Uses of Force as It Relates to Foreign Policy Decision-Making

...Uses of force as it relates to Foreign Policy decision-making describes a critical tool a president, diplomat, or military leader has at his or her disposal to persuade a country or person to align with certain policy goals or ideas. Each force can have either a positive or negative end result if not used and communicated properly. For example the appropriate use of force for a country seeking weapons on the grey market to supply radicalized militia groups will be different than the force used to deal with a nation infringing on another’s sovereignty. Sometimes the way a certain force is chosen and applied is based on how we may perceive that countries reaction to it. In some cases it is necessary for Force to be applied inclremently in order to avoid unwanted conflicts. Most nations’ states seek to resolve matters diplomatically before using the force of:”Aggression” or “Armed Power” in order to resolve matters at the lowest possible denominator. If this cannot be done then measures are taken in order to assess the risk of an unwanted outcome and use the best possible course of action one has at his or her disposal. Nations may also chose to use force in concert with each other in order to have a more effective impact. For years we have used the forces of Armed Power, with Economic and Diplomatic means to engage Iran and its allies. While this is adequate and necessary for Iran given the circumstances, we will not use this specific force to engage china freed trade......

Words: 497 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Do You Agree with the View That, in the Years 1511-27, English Successes in Foreign Policy Outweighed the Failures?

... English successes in foreign policy outweighed the failures? I agree with the view that English successes in foreign policy outweighed the failures in the years 1511-27 to a certain extent. England managed to successfully pursue a policy of peace making in the years 1514-21 and wolsey was flexible in his diplomacy. However, it could also be argued that Henry’s chief aim, the invasion of France, was unpopular with people at the time and that Henry’s foreign policy was too costly given how little of long term value it brought to England. His allies also often let him down and put their own aims before those of England. In this essay I will be looking at three sources and weighing up the two sides of the argument. A point in support of this view is that that England managed to successfully pursue a policy of peace making in the years 1514-21. This is shown in source 4, where MD Palmer tells us that Wolsey successfully brought about peace between England and France in 1514 and that he engineered the universal peace of London in 1518. He also planned the Field of the Cloth of Gold of 1520 and negotiated peace between the Empire and France at Calais in 1521. Wolsey’s peaceful approach also benefitted England in that it reduced costs at a time when the country could not afford another war, and successfully made England a major ‘player’ in Europe, which was a desire of Henry’s. Another point in support of the view that the successes in foreign policy outweighed the......

Words: 710 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

United We Stand; Divided We Fall Why Appropriate U.S. Intervention in Foreign Policy Is a Necessity for Global Peace

...United We Stand; Divided We Fall Why Appropriate U.S. Intervention in Foreign Policy is a Necessity for Global Peace In recent times it has become clear that trust of the United States’ ability to foster and produce peace is at an all-time low. In fact, it has recently been reported by The New York Post that a Gallup poll which analyzed data collected from 66,000 people polled in 65 countries that the U.S. is considered to be more threatening to peace efforts than Pakistan, Iran, and China combined, “Of the 66,000 people polled, just under a quarter named Uncle Sam as the greatest threat to world peace,” (New York Post, 2014). While this data sheds a frightening light upon the global opinion of the U.S.’s ability to act as successful peacekeepers, and due to many of the blunders experienced during Bush’s presidency, it is understandable as to why faith in the U.S. has diminished. However, both recent and historical data points towards the contrary, and instead has shown the importance of U.S. intervention in maintaining peace and showing the world that violations of human rights will not be tolerated. Therefore appropriate U.S. intervention within certain foreign policies is a necessity for global peace. Due to the U.S. maintaining one of the world’s largest militia in non-war times it is imperative that the United States’ military be involved in global efforts to foster and maintain peace when necessary. Many countries do not have the capability to defend......

Words: 1971 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

How Far Did Mussolini Achieve His Aims in Foreign Policy?

...How far did Mussolini achieve his aims in Foreign Policy? One of the first things that Benito Mussolini wanted to do was to expand Italy and give it and empire to rule over like France and Great Britain. He wanted Italy to be recognized as one of the dominant forces in Europe. The first of his conquests was Abyssinia. This he begun on the 40th Anniversary of the humiliating defeat Italy suffered at Adowa under the Liberals: Mussolini wanted to complete a fete that the Liberals couldn’t. As a means of propaganda to show that Italy was more powerful and united under Fascism than it had been under the Liberals. Mussolini gloried and reveled in the creation of an East African Empire. Britain and France, who Italy were allying with secretly allowed for and gave concession to his Abyssinian war. However, because they were both democracy’s, under internal condemnation and pressure, they had to publicly criticize Mussolini and Italy’s actions. This really infuriated Mussolini at the sheer hypocrisy shown by the 2 countries, as they both had large empires. This was also done because the public saw this as a brutal violation of another League of Nations country. Furthermore, in private Britain and France tried to mediate a deal, the Laval Pact. But this didn’t help the situation, because they had to side with the League of Nations, who enforced sanctions on Italy. However, this made Mussolini immensely popular at home, what one might call his finest hour. The sanctions didn’t......

Words: 368 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Vdid Wolsey and Henry Have an Effective Foreign Policy During the Years 1515 – 1525?

...vDid Wolsey and Henry have an effective foreign policy during the years 1515 – 1525? In some respects it can be said that Henry and Wolsey had an effective foreign policy in the years 1515 – 1525. Henry and Wolsey were responsible for the Treaty of London and were also sought after as a useful ally by other more important European powers. However some would argue that their policies were not effective due to the amount of money that was spent on international events and warfare and the fact that nothing was really achieved. Firstly it could be argued that his policies were effective due to the fact that Henry and Wolsey were responsible for the Treaty of London, the signatories were France, England, Holy Roman Empire, the Papacy, Spain, Burgundy and the Netherlands, all of whom agreed not to attack one another and to come to the aid of any that were under attack. This was a great achievement for Henry and Wolsey as England managed to aucestrate a treaty that was way above its size and importance, this therefore brought England to the table of European politics this means that Henry and Wolsey had an effective foreign policies. In addition source L supports this because Henry is large and this implies that he was considered important and this implies that his policies must have been successful as he was considered godlike. However the painting might have been painted to demonstrate Henrys power and wealth. There is also a dragon in the painting implicating that it is not...

Words: 582 - Pages: 3