Free Essay

Forgotten Member Case Study

In: Business and Management

Submitted By carleena
Words 1327
Pages 6
Part I: Group Development
According to Schermerhorn (2012, page 147), "A team is a group of people holding themselves collectively accountable for using complementary skills to achieve a common purpose." The stages of team or group development as defined by Tuckman (Schermerhorn 2012, p. 156) are forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning. Depending on the current stage of group development, leaders and members can face different challenges and the resulting team is more or less effective (page 156). The forming stage focuses around the initial entry of members to a team. The storming stage is one of high emotionality and tension among team members. The norming stage is where members start to work together as a coordinated team. The performing stage marks the emergence of a mature and well-functioning team and the adjourning stage is where teams disband when their work is finished.
In reference to the case, "The Forgotten Group Member", found on page W-113 of Schermerhorn (2012), the team remains in the storming stage-- one of "high emotionality and tension among team members" (Schermerhorn 2012, p. 157). Tension and emotionality are demonstrated in the case with Mike's absence and incomplete contribution, as well as his sarcastic reaction in the cafeteria based on the incorrect assumption the team was meeting without him. Conflict is also illustrated in the case by the anxiety and pressure experienced by the leader as the deadline approaches. Although she notes deep concern and empathy for Mike's situation, she admits to feeling distracted by Mike's lack of participation and engagement in the group and cannot focus on her accounting course work. By understanding the stages of group development, Christine would see the need to intervene as a leader to manage the tension and emotionality through maintenance leadership tasks to clarify, encourage, support, redirect and provide feedback (Schermerhorn 2012, p.175).
Part II: Problem Identification
The primary problem in this case is one of poor leadership--Christine is missing some of the "must have" leadership skills for creating effective teams as described on page 170 of Schermerhorn (2012) which include keeping goals and expectations clear, communicating high standards and modeling positive team member behaviors. She has either not communicated or not reinforced standards of attendance and submission. According to Schermerhorn (2012, p. 161) " When tasks are clear and well defined, it is easier for members to both know what they are trying to accomplish and to work together while doing it".
Christine should understand that individual members on teams need to be encouraged, supported, directed and given feedback--processes of maintenance leadership (Schermerhorn 2012, p.175). She does not yet understand how to incorporate meeting the individual group member's needs into the process of effective team building. Maintenance leadership (Schermerhorn 2012, p.175) refers to leadership activities which support the emotional life and interpersonal interactions among members through encouragement in participation, praising of contributions, and resolving conflicts between members. Although Christine felt empathy and concern for Mike's job constraints and girlfriend problems, she seems to have done nothing with this information which inadvertently reinforced Mike's absentee behavior.
The secondary problem in this case is related to Mike's social loafing which threatens the effectiveness and cohesiveness of the group. A social loafer is an individual who works less hard in groups than he would individually (Schermerhorn 2012, p. 154 ). Mike's social loafing is intimately related to the poor maintenance leadership of Christine. According to Schermerhorn (2012, p. 157) the relationship between social loafing and perceived dispensability strengthened when individual contributions were more identifiable. In place of providing constructive feedback, modeling appropriate group behavior, encouraging or supporting Mike's role in the group--functions of a good leader--she is simply enabling his social loafing by passively accepting this behavior.
Part III: Retrospective Evaluation
I have identified the primary problem in the case as a lack of effective leadership--specifically Christine's failure to build an effect team with clear objectives, well-defined responsibilities and high standards. Short of sending Christine for a crash course in leadership, I would recommend an instructor intervention and leadership self-appraisal. Christine will perform a self-analysis by identifying the issues present in the group in order to consider her role in their development. Finally she will define strategies to integrate Mike into the group's culture, thereby minimizing his social loafing behavior. She can then meet with Mike individually to reinforce his role in the group and to discuss his social loafing behavior and together come up with strategies for change. She will then meet with the group as a whole to reinforce expectations, standards and each member's value to the group as a whole.
A second solution to the problem of leadership would be to change the leader. Based on the case scenario Steve is portrayed in the case as a business-like personality who was "always wanting to ensure that group meetings were guided by an agenda and noting the tangible results achieved or not achieved at the end of every meeting" (Schermerhorn 2012, W-113 and may possess a task-focussed leadership style that would benefit the group at this late stage in the assignment. The group should meet immediately to vote on a new leader as it may be difficult to achieve unanimity as I imagine Mike won't attend. Following the vote, the new leader would perform a team building exercise which would include Mike in a way that would help him reintegrate and then set clear expectations for task deadline achievement, participation and standards of submission.
The pros and cons of performing a leadership appraisal versus changing the leader are presented here: Pros Cons
Leadership Appraisal Keeping the same leader avoids delay in group task progress Team may not accept a new leadership "personality" from the same individual

Christine learns from the self-analysis and improves her leadership skills (trial by error) Mike may not be willing to share or change his behavior with the same leader in place

Mike has the opportunity to share his needs and concerns directly with the leader Change of Leadership A new leader creates an opportunity and expectation for change Christine does not learn as effectively from her mistakes without the analysis

Steve's business-like approach will help the group complete the task this close to deadline Mike may not be affected by the leadership change and continue to underperform as his needs are still not addressed formally

Part IV: Reflection
Christine is an ineffective leader. An effective team reflects good leadership and team cohesion. An effective team is one that achieves high levels of task performance, member satisfaction, and team viability (Schermerhorn 2012, p. 152). In this case, one of the members displays social loafing behavior reinforced by the leader through passive acceptance. He erroneously believes he has been left out of a secret group meeting by virtue of observing a cohesive group simply engaging in an impromptu lunch which subsequently reinforce his social loafing behavior. The issues presented relate to his attendance, his quality of work, his sense of inclusion, his sense of satisfaction and resulting social loafing which negatively impact the group project and ultimately illustrate the leadership deficiencies.
Team effectiveness, as defined by Schermerhorn (2012, p. 159) relies on task performance, member satisfaction and team viability. It is a function of the quality of the inputs (team composition and size, resources and setting, and nature of the task) and related processes (the way members interaction and work together) (Schermerhorn 2012, p. 159). At first glance, one might consider Mike's deficient contributions to the group as self-imposed. However upon analyzing Christine's leadership skills, she is lacking in some of the essential leadership traits as clearly noted in Schermerhorn's "must-haves" section on page 170 (2012). Christine needs to analyze her contribution to the problem of Mike's disconnect from the group culture and build a more effective and cohesive team--all for one, one for all.
References:
Schermerhorn, R. Organizational Behavior. 12th. Ed. 2012.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Case 7-the Forgotten Group Member

...Case 7-The Forgotten Group Member MGMT591 Leadership and Organizational Behavior 2012 The Forgotten Group Member In the case of The Forgotten Group Member the information is spotty but it is clear that Christine is dealing with situations in a very passive manor and she will get more out of her team if she understood the staged of group/team development which would assist her Leadership role. When the team was formed by the teacher and the group got together it would have been in Christine’s and the group’s best interest to assess the others and see the reaction. When Mike keeps making excuses of why he can’t make the meetings Christine could put it in his hands by asking him when he would like him to meet, making it more his responsibility (idea). By giving it to him then he is more likely to show up and participate. Understanding everyone’s strengths in the group you can gear what each person does to their own strength making it easier to get the end results you want or need. When the group is being formed in the beginning the group should come up with what the consequences will be and stick to it, maintain the groups integrity even if you have to report a student to the teacher for not participating, the group can easily pick up Mike’s role and will be more efficient. Christine needs to look more at the actions and personality of the group’s members and what stage they are in to help overcome the issues that Mike brings to the group. Maybe with the right......

Words: 715 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Case Study: the Forgotten Group Member

...The Forgotten Group Member Case Study Wanda Keeton keetonwanda@yahoo.com MGMT 591 Leadership and Organizational Behavior November 18, 2012 Dr. Thomas M. Bock Part I: Group Development Reflecting on the case and our text book I believe that the group is in the Storming stage which is the second phase of the group development. There are five phases in group development; the first one is Forming. This stage is when the group starts coming together and begins by introducing themselves. According to the case study Christine is the leader of the group and the other group members are Diane, Janet, Steve and Mike. The second phase is Storming. In this stage the group is coming together showing their own personalities and different opinions during brainstorming. Some of the group has pulled together and have done their portion of the assignment. The group is still not cohesive because of Mike. Mike has missed out on most of the meetings and has not done is fair share of the assignment. The third phase is Norming. In this phase the group should be relating to each other and should be working together on the assignment. Four of the members are getting along and working well together, Mike is feeling left out as he doesn’t attend most of the meetings and is not giving any input. The fourth phase is Performing. In this phase everyone is turning in their part of the assignment so that the leader can compile all the information. Everyone has done their portion even Mike......

Words: 853 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Case Study: New Team Member

...Case Study: New Team Member By Sherri Johnson Project Management 4460 Professor Hepler Term IV 2011 Troy University – Ecampus April 21, 2011 Abstract This case study is about a company called Straight Arrow Systems Corp. This company makes items for the military. The team leader for the hardware department is Bob. Bob has a strange introduction process for his employees. Brad is a new team member and is about to learn the ropes of the department. The high turnover rate should tell management that there is a problem with the department. They should conduct an investigation instead of sending new employees to the group and having them quit shortly after joining. Case Study: New Team Member The first question that needs to be answered is “what behaviors is Bob demonstrating with respect to valuing team diversity and they also ask what are some alternative choices for what Brad can do next.” (Clements and Gido, 2009) Bob is definitely showing signs of discrimination against his own team members. The wide range of diversity does not appeal to him and he seems to believe that he needs to carry the weight of the team with Bill. The team has nothing in common as far as age, appearance, ethnicity, gender, health, job status, marital and parental status, race, and religious affiliation for this project. This is how Bob groups the members of his team. Bob is ultimately discriminate......

Words: 672 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Gm591 Case Study - Forgotten Team Member

...Behavior Through utilizing the information from the case study of “The Forgotten Group Member,” and the explanation of the stages of team development in the course textbook, Organizational Behavior, (2010, p. 166) of forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning, the majority of the group members are in the norming stage, but never resolved issues that started in the storming stage. Therefore, collectively, they are still in the storming stage. The group is in a state of conflict because Mike is non-committal with meeting, does not hand in quality work, and is acting jealous of the relationships the team has formed while in his absence. Mike’s role in the group was not clearly defined. Christine is the team coordinator, Steve is assigned to creating an agenda each meeting, Diane is resourceful, and Janet is reliable in doing more than what is expected for the group. All of these roles have been informally defined, and Mike’s role and expectations were not defined well enough for him to see his value to the group. In the forming stage of team development, team members are concerned more with seeing where they fit in, and what their role is on the team. Since the rest of the group has been meeting, they have formed a relationship and a clique without Mike. When other group members see they are not being included, this can create emotion and conflict, which is characteristic of the storming stage. Later in the case, we learn that Christine feels that she......

Words: 1773 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

The Forgotten Team Member Case Study

...Our case study this week looked at the issues Christine Spencer faced as the Team Coordinator of her course project group in her Organizational Behavior class. While Christine was satisfied with most of the team's progress and interactions, there was one team member whose work was lacking. This team member, Mike, did not seem to click with the group and had not completed his portion of the assignment. In order to offer a possible solution, it is important to look back at what went wrong with the group dynamic. Group Development There are five stages of team development. The first stage, the Forming Stage, is when the group first meets and gets to know each other. The second stage, the Storming Stage, is noted in our textbook as "one of high emotionality and tension among team members." (Schermerhorm, 2011, p. 156) During this stage, team members work to define their roles in the project and the tasks that will need to be completed in order to be successful. The third stage, the Norming Stage, is a period in which the group continues to work together and strengthens their relationship as a team. Next is the Performing Stage, where the team becomes a cohesive, mature unit. At this point, the team is able to work smoothly to progress towards their goals. Any disagreements are easily solved within the unit, and team members are able to move on and continue with work. The final stage is the Adjourning Stage, when work is completed. The team disbands after celebrating...

Words: 1989 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

The Forgotten Member Case Study

...“The Forgotten Member” Case Study 1. Group development After carefully reviewing details given for the case, it seems that the group is stuck between storming and norming stages. Even though four members of the team accepted each other and started working together on the assignment, there is one person that has been, as per title of the case, forgotten member. Mike does not participate in the meetings and is not contributing as expected by the team. At the same time, team members are not concerned about his absence. Moreover, Mike’s hostile behavior causes further isolation. In the storming stage of team development, leader’s role is to help clarify membership expectations and find ways to accomplish team goals while also meeting personal needs potential (Schermerhorn, Osborn, Uhl-Bien, Hunt, 2012). Christine lacks experience and skills to lead the group through the team development stages. In result, the group has never come together to reach next stages of team development namely norming, performing, and adjourning. Each person works individually on the designated section, there is no communication and shared responsibility for the overall result. Knowledge of stages of team development would certainly help Christine to understand group dynamics and prepare solutions for different challenges right from the beginning. 2. Problem identification The main primary problem is lack of leadership skills, especially in a team formation process, and passiveness of a......

Words: 827 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Case Study - the Forgotten Group Member

...Case Study: The Forgotten Group Member MGMT 591 – Leadership and Organizational Behavior Christopher Declerk 1/27/2013 Group Development 5 Stages of Group Development 1. Forming Stage: In the Forming stage, personal relations are characterized by dependence. Group members rely on safe, patterned behavior and look to the trainer for guidance and direction. Individual learners have a desire for acceptance by the group and a need to know that the group is safe. They set about gathering impressions and data about the similarities and differences among people in the group, and forming preferences. 2. Storming Stage: This stage is characterized by competition and conflict in personal relations. As the group members attempt to work together on the task, conflict inevitably results - healthy debate or slight disagreement. Individuals may need to adapt their feelings, ideas, attitudes, and beliefs to suit the group. 3. Norming Stage: In the norming stage, interpersonal relations are characterized by cohesion. Learners are engaged in active acknowledgment of others' contributions, community building and maintenance, and solving of group issues. Individuals will be willing to change their preconceived ideas or opinions on the basis of facts presented by others, and they actively ask questions of one another. 4. Performing Stage: The performing stage is not always reached by all groups, however if learners are able to get through this stage their......

Words: 721 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

The Forgotten Team Member: a Case Analysis

...Behavior Case Study The Forgotten Team Member: A Case Analysis Shon Gregory 11-26-2012   Group Development Just as all people go through phases of change in their lifecycle, childhood, adolescence, adult, and old age, teams also go through development/lifecycle phases as well. Depending upon the stage of development that a team is in, issues, challenges, and opportunities should be handle differently. Those phases are Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing, and Adjourning. In our Case Study, The Forgotten Team Member, our team is in the storming phase. By understanding the phases and identifying the current stage that Christine’s team is in, would help Christine in being the Team Coordinator of her class project team. Problem Identification According to our text, the storming stage is characterized by high emotions and tension, it is the most tumultuous period of team the development. Coalitions and cliques start to emerge, individuals start to jockey for positions of status, and obstacles that prevent the team for achieve start to become present. (Schermerhorn 156-157). This true for Christine’s team. Although she was appointed leader of the group, Steve, the businesslike personality, made sure that he was keeping the group on task, a role generally performed by the leader. Mike’s social loafing is starting to make him feel as an outsider to the group, he’s passive-aggressive behavior further emphasizes his outsider status. The other members are......

Words: 1021 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

The Forgotten Member- a Case Report

...The Forgotten Member- A Case Report In Organizational Behavior, we define a team as a group of people brought together to use their complementary skills to achieve a common purpose for which they are collectively accountable. (Schermerhorn, 2010) Stages of group development Bruce Tuckman (1965) developed a 4-stage model of group development.  They are 1. Forming: The group comes together and gets to initially know one other and form as a group. 2. Storming: A chaotic vying for leadership and trialing of group processes 3. Norming: Eventually agreement is reached on how the group operates 4. Performing: The group practices its craft and becomes effective in meeting its objectives. 5. Adjourning: The process of "unforming" the group, that is, letting go of the group structure and moving on. Part I: Group Development  The Forgotten Member is a case study of a group of students who were assigned a project by their professor. In the case of Christine and her group which is composed of her classmates in accounting, their goal is to generate a well-written analysis in reviewing a 7-page case. This five member group is a dynamic bunch because of the mix of different personalities. Since there is diversity within the group, it cannot be prevented that a variety of perceptions and work attitudes affect the group processes and development. It also mentions different personality traits that a team coordinator has to encounter in a team to maintain a balance. It also......

Words: 1351 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Case 7 - the Forgotten Team Member

...Yolande` Williams Week 3: OB Skills Workbook: Case 7 – The Forgotten Team Member May 23, 2011 Part 1: Group Development 1. How could an understanding of the stages of group development assist Christine in leadership situations such as this one? Christine must first have an understanding that a group is defined as a collection of people who interact with one another, accept rights and obligations as members and who share a common identity. In Christine accounting group, their goal is to compose a well-written analysis. This 5-member group is a dynamic bunch because of the different mix of personalities. Because of the dynamics, the variety of perceptions and work attitudes that affect the group processes and development cannot be prevented. With this understanding, Christine would have been able to key in on certain clues on how to handle the different circumstances of her team. Through the forming stages the group would have been given a chance to get to know one another and what is acceptable behavior. In the storming stage, members are able to address their differences. Group members are able to understand one another’s interpersonal styles and ways to accomplish team goals all while satisfying personal needs. In the norming stages, members address their differences and tensions tend to loosen up. With the performing stage member work as a team and their skills and values are developed and needed to successfully accomplish the team’s work. More......

Words: 852 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

The Forgotten Group Member Case Study

...Chapter 7 Case Study 1. The first stage of the group development phase is forming. This phase is where the group begins to gather and start introductions.  Discussing the case Study, The Organizational Behavior Group Christine leads, along with Diane, Janet, Steve and Mike. The First group meeting in the case study involved Christine and her group getting acquitted with one another, which signals the forming phase. The second phase is Storming. This is known to be one of the hardest phases in group development due to conflicting personalities and different opinions in the brainstorming process. This would refer to the case study in the situation when Christine planned a team meeting 5 weeks into the semester. The conflict was that Mike would not attend most meetings. This resulted in him not participating with the team, which was the opposite interest of the entire team. Norming is the phase that comes after storming. During this phase, this is when the whole team learns to relate and starts building relationships with each other as friends, rather than acquaintances while attempting to reach the same goal. This started to happen around week 5 in the semester, when the whole team was already feeling comfortable with each other, having the ability to joke with each other. This made Mike feel left out since he missed meetings. After norming is the fourth phase, performing. This is where the united plan of a group is being accomplished. This phase is shown in the case......

Words: 596 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Case Study Week 3 Group Development: the Forgotten Member

...The Forgotten Member Part 1: Group Development Forming Stage: Members in this stage will ask a number of questions as they are still in the process of getting to know one another better. The questions asked can vary. Group members may raise the following questions: "What can I contribute to the group?" "What can the group offer me?" In this stage members are more concerned with getting to know one another a little bit better and learn behavior that's acceptable. Storming Stage - In this stage members tend to be highly emotional and there tends to be a lot of tension in the air. Coalitions and cliques typically form during this stage as members compete to achieve status quo and impose their preferences on one another. This tends to be the most difficult stage to accomplish. Norming Stage - During this stage members are unified. There's now a new sense of harmony following the storming stage and members strive to maintain that harmony. Performing Stage - At this stage we are totally integrated! We now have a well-organized team that functions maturely. We are motivated by team goals and objectives and stable. Additionally, we are satisfied without jobs. At this point we are a High Performance Organization! Adjourning State - Once we have reached the performing stage we are ready to adjourn. At the ‘Adjournment Stage’ the members are able to disband if necessarily, convene quickly, and perform their duties on a tight schedule. Based on the information......

Words: 1706 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

The Forgotten Member

...improvements in performance will | | |marketing team, allowing competitors to make |render imitations inferior. | | |their products cheaper. | | |Government Regulation |Laws passed that restrict use to only military |The marketing team will work closely with the | | |vehicles due to the strength and durability of |government and military, with lobbyists in | | |the Twheel. |Washington D.C stating its case. | | |Laws passed restricting or delaying the release| | | |of the Twheel for the benefit of other tire | | | |companies. | | Exhibit 5: Company Organization [pic] Works Cited (2007). No more flat tires. Advanced Materials & Processes. Retrieved March 10, 2008, from Business & Company Resource Center database. Noga, Edward. (2005). Intelligent design. Rubber & Plastics News......

Words: 3781 - Pages: 16

Premium Essay

Case Study 7: the Forgotten Group Member

...CASE STUDY 7: THE FORGOTTEN GROUP MEMBER GM591 LEADERSHIP AND ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR Group Development At this point, Christine’s group is considered to be stuck at the storming stage. This is the stage where high tension and emotionality amongst the group members have occurred. (Schermerhorn, et al., 2010) Mike is causing a lot of the tension because he can’t commit to the group meetings; and therefore, it is hard for them to stay motivated and complete their assignment. (Ramsoomair, Franklin 2010) Each group was assigned a specific task and a different section to complete, but Mike is putting a strain on the group by continuing to miss the group meetings and not contributing like he should. (Ramsoomair, Franklin 2010) Christine needed to know the series of life cycle stages that a team passes through because it would have prepared her for the different challenges. Knowing the stages would have helped her to handle the situations differently and also helped the team to remain effective. (Schermerhorn, et al., 2010) Going through the forming stage would have pinpointed who were the hard workers and who were the slackers as they became more acquainted. As she noticed Mike’s behavior in the beginning, she could have found it unacceptable and corrected it. It was expected for everyone to be at the group meetings, but Mike started being absent and became the obstacle standing in the way of the group’s goals which began the storming stage. (Schermerhorn, et al.,......

Words: 1277 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Case Study the Forgotten Group Member

...Case Study - The Forgotten Group Member Helen M. Gales GM591 - Leadership and Organizational Behavior Keller Graduate School of Management Professor Leo Shelton July 23, 2012 Case Study - The Forgotten Group Member Part 1: Group Development In looking over the details given for the case, the group appears to still be in the Storming stage. While some of the team has come together and are providing their assigned portions of the class project, they still are not a cohesive, and functioning team; due to one of their team members being preoccupied with outside demands and not really coming together with the rest of the team. By having a better understanding of the stages of group development, Christine would have had a better idea of how to lead the group through the different stages and help them to move forward towards a successful completion of the assignment. The text indicates that for a team to be successful it needs to go through all of the stages, forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning; making progress as each stage is completed. Part II: Problem Identification From the little amount of information that the case gives concerning the initial meetings of the group, the primary problem is that Mike is seen as the "clown" and not taken seriously when suggestions are made. From what the text indicates about the different stages, this indicates a "clique" was formed between the other team members, and a general lack of concern was given to Mike and...

Words: 967 - Pages: 4