Free Essay

Forgotten Member Case Study

In: Business and Management

Submitted By carleena
Words 1327
Pages 6
Part I: Group Development
According to Schermerhorn (2012, page 147), "A team is a group of people holding themselves collectively accountable for using complementary skills to achieve a common purpose." The stages of team or group development as defined by Tuckman (Schermerhorn 2012, p. 156) are forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning. Depending on the current stage of group development, leaders and members can face different challenges and the resulting team is more or less effective (page 156). The forming stage focuses around the initial entry of members to a team. The storming stage is one of high emotionality and tension among team members. The norming stage is where members start to work together as a coordinated team. The performing stage marks the emergence of a mature and well-functioning team and the adjourning stage is where teams disband when their work is finished.
In reference to the case, "The Forgotten Group Member", found on page W-113 of Schermerhorn (2012), the team remains in the storming stage-- one of "high emotionality and tension among team members" (Schermerhorn 2012, p. 157). Tension and emotionality are demonstrated in the case with Mike's absence and incomplete contribution, as well as his sarcastic reaction in the cafeteria based on the incorrect assumption the team was meeting without him. Conflict is also illustrated in the case by the anxiety and pressure experienced by the leader as the deadline approaches. Although she notes deep concern and empathy for Mike's situation, she admits to feeling distracted by Mike's lack of participation and engagement in the group and cannot focus on her accounting course work. By understanding the stages of group development, Christine would see the need to intervene as a leader to manage the tension and emotionality through maintenance leadership tasks to clarify, encourage, support, redirect and provide feedback (Schermerhorn 2012, p.175).
Part II: Problem Identification
The primary problem in this case is one of poor leadership--Christine is missing some of the "must have" leadership skills for creating effective teams as described on page 170 of Schermerhorn (2012) which include keeping goals and expectations clear, communicating high standards and modeling positive team member behaviors. She has either not communicated or not reinforced standards of attendance and submission. According to Schermerhorn (2012, p. 161) " When tasks are clear and well defined, it is easier for members to both know what they are trying to accomplish and to work together while doing it".
Christine should understand that individual members on teams need to be encouraged, supported, directed and given feedback--processes of maintenance leadership (Schermerhorn 2012, p.175). She does not yet understand how to incorporate meeting the individual group member's needs into the process of effective team building. Maintenance leadership (Schermerhorn 2012, p.175) refers to leadership activities which support the emotional life and interpersonal interactions among members through encouragement in participation, praising of contributions, and resolving conflicts between members. Although Christine felt empathy and concern for Mike's job constraints and girlfriend problems, she seems to have done nothing with this information which inadvertently reinforced Mike's absentee behavior.
The secondary problem in this case is related to Mike's social loafing which threatens the effectiveness and cohesiveness of the group. A social loafer is an individual who works less hard in groups than he would individually (Schermerhorn 2012, p. 154 ). Mike's social loafing is intimately related to the poor maintenance leadership of Christine. According to Schermerhorn (2012, p. 157) the relationship between social loafing and perceived dispensability strengthened when individual contributions were more identifiable. In place of providing constructive feedback, modeling appropriate group behavior, encouraging or supporting Mike's role in the group--functions of a good leader--she is simply enabling his social loafing by passively accepting this behavior.
Part III: Retrospective Evaluation
I have identified the primary problem in the case as a lack of effective leadership--specifically Christine's failure to build an effect team with clear objectives, well-defined responsibilities and high standards. Short of sending Christine for a crash course in leadership, I would recommend an instructor intervention and leadership self-appraisal. Christine will perform a self-analysis by identifying the issues present in the group in order to consider her role in their development. Finally she will define strategies to integrate Mike into the group's culture, thereby minimizing his social loafing behavior. She can then meet with Mike individually to reinforce his role in the group and to discuss his social loafing behavior and together come up with strategies for change. She will then meet with the group as a whole to reinforce expectations, standards and each member's value to the group as a whole.
A second solution to the problem of leadership would be to change the leader. Based on the case scenario Steve is portrayed in the case as a business-like personality who was "always wanting to ensure that group meetings were guided by an agenda and noting the tangible results achieved or not achieved at the end of every meeting" (Schermerhorn 2012, W-113 and may possess a task-focussed leadership style that would benefit the group at this late stage in the assignment. The group should meet immediately to vote on a new leader as it may be difficult to achieve unanimity as I imagine Mike won't attend. Following the vote, the new leader would perform a team building exercise which would include Mike in a way that would help him reintegrate and then set clear expectations for task deadline achievement, participation and standards of submission.
The pros and cons of performing a leadership appraisal versus changing the leader are presented here: Pros Cons
Leadership Appraisal Keeping the same leader avoids delay in group task progress Team may not accept a new leadership "personality" from the same individual

Christine learns from the self-analysis and improves her leadership skills (trial by error) Mike may not be willing to share or change his behavior with the same leader in place

Mike has the opportunity to share his needs and concerns directly with the leader Change of Leadership A new leader creates an opportunity and expectation for change Christine does not learn as effectively from her mistakes without the analysis

Steve's business-like approach will help the group complete the task this close to deadline Mike may not be affected by the leadership change and continue to underperform as his needs are still not addressed formally

Part IV: Reflection
Christine is an ineffective leader. An effective team reflects good leadership and team cohesion. An effective team is one that achieves high levels of task performance, member satisfaction, and team viability (Schermerhorn 2012, p. 152). In this case, one of the members displays social loafing behavior reinforced by the leader through passive acceptance. He erroneously believes he has been left out of a secret group meeting by virtue of observing a cohesive group simply engaging in an impromptu lunch which subsequently reinforce his social loafing behavior. The issues presented relate to his attendance, his quality of work, his sense of inclusion, his sense of satisfaction and resulting social loafing which negatively impact the group project and ultimately illustrate the leadership deficiencies.
Team effectiveness, as defined by Schermerhorn (2012, p. 159) relies on task performance, member satisfaction and team viability. It is a function of the quality of the inputs (team composition and size, resources and setting, and nature of the task) and related processes (the way members interaction and work together) (Schermerhorn 2012, p. 159). At first glance, one might consider Mike's deficient contributions to the group as self-imposed. However upon analyzing Christine's leadership skills, she is lacking in some of the essential leadership traits as clearly noted in Schermerhorn's "must-haves" section on page 170 (2012). Christine needs to analyze her contribution to the problem of Mike's disconnect from the group culture and build a more effective and cohesive team--all for one, one for all.
References:
Schermerhorn, R. Organizational Behavior. 12th. Ed. 2012.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

The Forgotten Member Case Study

...“The Forgotten Member” Case Study 1. Group development After carefully reviewing details given for the case, it seems that the group is stuck between storming and norming stages. Even though four members of the team accepted each other and started working together on the assignment, there is one person that has been, as per title of the case, forgotten member. Mike does not participate in the meetings and is not contributing as expected by the team. At the same time, team members are not concerned about his absence. Moreover, Mike’s hostile behavior causes further isolation. In the storming stage of team development, leader’s role is to help clarify membership expectations and find ways to accomplish team goals while also meeting personal needs potential (Schermerhorn, Osborn, Uhl-Bien, Hunt, 2012). Christine lacks experience and skills to lead the group through the team development stages. In result, the group has never come together to reach next stages of team development namely norming, performing, and adjourning. Each person works individually on the designated section, there is no communication and shared responsibility for the overall result. Knowledge of stages of team development would certainly help Christine to understand group dynamics and prepare solutions for different challenges right from the beginning. 2. Problem identification The main primary problem is lack of leadership skills, especially in a team formation process, and passiveness of a......

Words: 827 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Case Study: the Forgotten Group Member

...The Forgotten Group Member Case Study Wanda Keeton keetonwanda@yahoo.com MGMT 591 Leadership and Organizational Behavior November 18, 2012 Dr. Thomas M. Bock Part I: Group Development Reflecting on the case and our text book I believe that the group is in the Storming stage which is the second phase of the group development. There are five phases in group development; the first one is Forming. This stage is when the group starts coming together and begins by introducing themselves. According to the case study Christine is the leader of the group and the other group members are Diane, Janet, Steve and Mike. The second phase is Storming. In this stage the group is coming together showing their own personalities and different opinions during brainstorming. Some of the group has pulled together and have done their portion of the assignment. The group is still not cohesive because of Mike. Mike has missed out on most of the meetings and has not done is fair share of the assignment. The third phase is Norming. In this phase the group should be relating to each other and should be working together on the assignment. Four of the members are getting along and working well together, Mike is feeling left out as he doesn’t attend most of the meetings and is not giving any input. The fourth phase is Performing. In this phase everyone is turning in their part of the assignment so that the leader can compile all the information. Everyone has done their portion even Mike......

Words: 853 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Case Study the Forgotten Group Member

...Case Study - The Forgotten Group Member Helen M. Gales GM591 - Leadership and Organizational Behavior Keller Graduate School of Management Professor Leo Shelton July 23, 2012 Case Study - The Forgotten Group Member Part 1: Group Development In looking over the details given for the case, the group appears to still be in the Storming stage. While some of the team has come together and are providing their assigned portions of the class project, they still are not a cohesive, and functioning team; due to one of their team members being preoccupied with outside demands and not really coming together with the rest of the team. By having a better understanding of the stages of group development, Christine would have had a better idea of how to lead the group through the different stages and help them to move forward towards a successful completion of the assignment. The text indicates that for a team to be successful it needs to go through all of the stages, forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning; making progress as each stage is completed. Part II: Problem Identification From the little amount of information that the case gives concerning the initial meetings of the group, the primary problem is that Mike is seen as the "clown" and not taken seriously when suggestions are made. From what the text indicates about the different stages, this indicates a "clique" was formed between the other team members, and a general lack of concern was given to Mike and...

Words: 967 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Case Study - the Forgotten Group Member

...Case Study: The Forgotten Group Member MGMT 591 – Leadership and Organizational Behavior Christopher Declerk 1/27/2013 Group Development 5 Stages of Group Development 1. Forming Stage: In the Forming stage, personal relations are characterized by dependence. Group members rely on safe, patterned behavior and look to the trainer for guidance and direction. Individual learners have a desire for acceptance by the group and a need to know that the group is safe. They set about gathering impressions and data about the similarities and differences among people in the group, and forming preferences. 2. Storming Stage: This stage is characterized by competition and conflict in personal relations. As the group members attempt to work together on the task, conflict inevitably results - healthy debate or slight disagreement. Individuals may need to adapt their feelings, ideas, attitudes, and beliefs to suit the group. 3. Norming Stage: In the norming stage, interpersonal relations are characterized by cohesion. Learners are engaged in active acknowledgment of others' contributions, community building and maintenance, and solving of group issues. Individuals will be willing to change their preconceived ideas or opinions on the basis of facts presented by others, and they actively ask questions of one another. 4. Performing Stage: The performing stage is not always reached by all groups, however if learners are able to get through this stage their......

Words: 721 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Gm591 Case Study - Forgotten Team Member

...Behavior Through utilizing the information from the case study of “The Forgotten Group Member,” and the explanation of the stages of team development in the course textbook, Organizational Behavior, (2010, p. 166) of forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning, the majority of the group members are in the norming stage, but never resolved issues that started in the storming stage. Therefore, collectively, they are still in the storming stage. The group is in a state of conflict because Mike is non-committal with meeting, does not hand in quality work, and is acting jealous of the relationships the team has formed while in his absence. Mike’s role in the group was not clearly defined. Christine is the team coordinator, Steve is assigned to creating an agenda each meeting, Diane is resourceful, and Janet is reliable in doing more than what is expected for the group. All of these roles have been informally defined, and Mike’s role and expectations were not defined well enough for him to see his value to the group. In the forming stage of team development, team members are concerned more with seeing where they fit in, and what their role is on the team. Since the rest of the group has been meeting, they have formed a relationship and a clique without Mike. When other group members see they are not being included, this can create emotion and conflict, which is characteristic of the storming stage. Later in the case, we learn that Christine feels that she......

Words: 1773 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Case Study 7: the Forgotten Group Member

...CASE STUDY 7: THE FORGOTTEN GROUP MEMBER GM591 LEADERSHIP AND ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR Group Development At this point, Christine’s group is considered to be stuck at the storming stage. This is the stage where high tension and emotionality amongst the group members have occurred. (Schermerhorn, et al., 2010) Mike is causing a lot of the tension because he can’t commit to the group meetings; and therefore, it is hard for them to stay motivated and complete their assignment. (Ramsoomair, Franklin 2010) Each group was assigned a specific task and a different section to complete, but Mike is putting a strain on the group by continuing to miss the group meetings and not contributing like he should. (Ramsoomair, Franklin 2010) Christine needed to know the series of life cycle stages that a team passes through because it would have prepared her for the different challenges. Knowing the stages would have helped her to handle the situations differently and also helped the team to remain effective. (Schermerhorn, et al., 2010) Going through the forming stage would have pinpointed who were the hard workers and who were the slackers as they became more acquainted. As she noticed Mike’s behavior in the beginning, she could have found it unacceptable and corrected it. It was expected for everyone to be at the group meetings, but Mike started being absent and became the obstacle standing in the way of the group’s goals which began the storming stage. (Schermerhorn, et al.,......

Words: 1277 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

The Forgotten Group Member Case Study

...Chapter 7 Case Study 1. The first stage of the group development phase is forming. This phase is where the group begins to gather and start introductions.  Discussing the case Study, The Organizational Behavior Group Christine leads, along with Diane, Janet, Steve and Mike. The First group meeting in the case study involved Christine and her group getting acquitted with one another, which signals the forming phase. The second phase is Storming. This is known to be one of the hardest phases in group development due to conflicting personalities and different opinions in the brainstorming process. This would refer to the case study in the situation when Christine planned a team meeting 5 weeks into the semester. The conflict was that Mike would not attend most meetings. This resulted in him not participating with the team, which was the opposite interest of the entire team. Norming is the phase that comes after storming. During this phase, this is when the whole team learns to relate and starts building relationships with each other as friends, rather than acquaintances while attempting to reach the same goal. This started to happen around week 5 in the semester, when the whole team was already feeling comfortable with each other, having the ability to joke with each other. This made Mike feel left out since he missed meetings. After norming is the fourth phase, performing. This is where the united plan of a group is being accomplished. This phase is shown in the case......

Words: 596 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

The Forgotten Team Member Case Study

...Our case study this week looked at the issues Christine Spencer faced as the Team Coordinator of her course project group in her Organizational Behavior class. While Christine was satisfied with most of the team's progress and interactions, there was one team member whose work was lacking. This team member, Mike, did not seem to click with the group and had not completed his portion of the assignment. In order to offer a possible solution, it is important to look back at what went wrong with the group dynamic. Group Development There are five stages of team development. The first stage, the Forming Stage, is when the group first meets and gets to know each other. The second stage, the Storming Stage, is noted in our textbook as "one of high emotionality and tension among team members." (Schermerhorm, 2011, p. 156) During this stage, team members work to define their roles in the project and the tasks that will need to be completed in order to be successful. The third stage, the Norming Stage, is a period in which the group continues to work together and strengthens their relationship as a team. Next is the Performing Stage, where the team becomes a cohesive, mature unit. At this point, the team is able to work smoothly to progress towards their goals. Any disagreements are easily solved within the unit, and team members are able to move on and continue with work. The final stage is the Adjourning Stage, when work is completed. The team disbands after celebrating...

Words: 1989 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Case Study Week 3 Group Development: the Forgotten Member

...The Forgotten Member Part 1: Group Development Forming Stage: Members in this stage will ask a number of questions as they are still in the process of getting to know one another better. The questions asked can vary. Group members may raise the following questions: "What can I contribute to the group?" "What can the group offer me?" In this stage members are more concerned with getting to know one another a little bit better and learn behavior that's acceptable. Storming Stage - In this stage members tend to be highly emotional and there tends to be a lot of tension in the air. Coalitions and cliques typically form during this stage as members compete to achieve status quo and impose their preferences on one another. This tends to be the most difficult stage to accomplish. Norming Stage - During this stage members are unified. There's now a new sense of harmony following the storming stage and members strive to maintain that harmony. Performing Stage - At this stage we are totally integrated! We now have a well-organized team that functions maturely. We are motivated by team goals and objectives and stable. Additionally, we are satisfied without jobs. At this point we are a High Performance Organization! Adjourning State - Once we have reached the performing stage we are ready to adjourn. At the ‘Adjournment Stage’ the members are able to disband if necessarily, convene quickly, and perform their duties on a tight schedule. Based on the information......

Words: 1706 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Yaaaaa

...1. the forgotten group member case study www.scribd.com/doc/.../the-forgotten-group-member-case-study You +1'd this publicly. Undo Sep 19, 2011 – ► 2. Online Cases - Wiley www.wiley.com/college/man/schermerhorn332879/.../frame00.htmCached You +1'd this publicly. Undo 10+ items – Online Cases are updated versions of the textbook case studies ... * • Sun Microsystems – Ch. 2 High Performance Organizations – Human resource ... * • Harley Davidson – Ch. 3 Global Dimensions – Leading; corporate culture ... * • Steinway Piano – Ch. 9 The Nature of Groups – Job design; quality; innovation ... 3. Case 9 The Forgotten Group Member Essay, Case 9 The ... - Essays essaysbank.com/search/Case+9...Forgotten+Group+Member/9Cached You +1'd this publicly. Undo 250.000 FREE Case 9 The Forgotten Group Member Papers & Case 9 The Forgotten Group Member Essays at ... Case Study Of Carnival Corporation, 6 / 1450 ... 4. Case 9 The Forgotten Group Member Essay, Case 9 The Forgotten ... essaysbank.com/search/Case+9++The+Forgotten+Group+MemberCached You +1'd this publicly. Undo 200+ items – 250.000 FREE Case 9 The Forgotten Group Member Papers & Case ... * • Case 9 ? The Forgotten Group Member – 2 / 526 * • A leader or member of the group – 1 / 223 * • Journal Entry Of A Subordinate Group Member – 3 / 796 Show more results from essaysbank.com 5. Free Reports on You Have Forgotten Yourself And That | 91 through......

Words: 555 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Matching Principle

...“The Forgotten Group Member” A case study In leadership and organizational behavior we define a group as a team of people brought together to use their complementary skills to achieve a common purpose for which they are collectively accountable. The “Forgotten Group Member” is a case study of a group of students who were assigned a project by their professor. One student Christine was appointed the group’s leader. The group had a dynamic spectrum of personalities and skills. A basic understanding of the group development stages could have helped Christine to become a more effective leader. The first stage in group development is the forming stage. This is the initial entry of members into the group; individual behavior is driven by a desire to be accepted by the other group members. In the storming stage different ideas compete for consideration. The group members are clarified and start to agree on completing team goals. The team addresses issues such as what problems they are to resolve and how they will function independently and as a group. They will also agree upon what type of leadership model will best meet the needs of the different personalities in the group. During the norming stage the group members form working relationships and start working together to accomplish the group goals. The group will have one overall goal and will make a mutual plan for the group. In the performing stage the groups relationships mature and tasks are being completed. Group......

Words: 734 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

The Forgotten Group Member

...Case Study wk 3” The Forgotten Group Member” Well after reading “The Forgotten Group Member” I think this has some very good examples for group development and the stages that go with it. I would say it would start with forming storming norming, and performing then adjourning. The forming concept begins as a group is brought together thru some formal selection and initially they talk and get to know one another. They select a leader who gives some direction and have tasks that are assigned for collecting data .There maybe some differences that have to be sorted out and perhaps some sub grouping, but by keeping a set of rules and keeping it simple as to avoid any problems and controversy .Even if there is conflict if it is simple can be resolved efficiently. The key here is to assign tasks and get them done efficiently as possible to avoid any issues and conflicts this can be accomplished if everyone becomes well orientated and works together defining tasks ,how to get it done and grow as a team to accomplish that goal. In Storming this is where the group begins to get ideas for the task defining and organizing getting into a group process. Coming up with ideas .Within the group ideas are tossed back and forth and sometimes so is conflict this is where organizing and setting some ground rules to put the effort into motion has to be set. In the Norming stage the interpersonalizations of a group are characterized by cohesion. In this process members contribute ideas and......

Words: 957 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Comm/215

...Revised Case Study Analyst Paper James Demencius COMM/215 June 23rd, 2014 Mrs. Oleah Morris Leave No Man Behind Even though The United States should not make deals with Terrorists, All Service Members from Wars and Conflicts deserve to and should be brought back to the United States. Services Members should never be left and forgotten in foreign countries; because they preserve our freedom so we should do whatever is possible in preserve theirs when they are captured. All Service Members captured or detained during times of War and Conflicts should be repatriated back to the United States as soon as the War or Conflict has been completed or when an exchange can be completed by both Governments. During past wars the United States has participated in Prisoner exchanges. Thirty Americans were among the 100 prisoners exchange between North Korea and the United Nations in 1953 (BBC Home, 2005). In 1973 the United States and Vietnam conducted a prisoner exchange of 142 men. (Sterba, 1973). If these practices were used in the past then why are they not acceptable in today’s society? There are a lot of things that we can say that we do not agree with what our President has done and not done, but this is one thing that he did correctly; freeing our Prisoner of War from rebel forces. I agree Congress was not aware of what was going to happen and they did not have a say so in the exchange but this has happen before with other Presidents as well. Whether or not if there......

Words: 427 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The Forgotten Group Member

... The Forgotten Group Member Melissa T Grice Keller Graduate School of Business Management Leadership & Organizational Behavior GM 591 Professor Carr July 23, 2011 The Forgotten Group Member According to our text, “A team is a group of people brought together to use their complementary skills to achieve a common purpose for which they are collectively accountable” (Schermerhorn, 2010). The case study involving, The Forgotten Group Member demonstrates an excellent example of how teams fail and fall apart related to a breakdown or lack of effective communication between all parties involved. Thus, it is important to acknowledge that a leader has responsibility to lead the team, but the members also must be involved in order to complete the project effectively and in a timely manner. Part I. Group Development After review of the case and data from the textbook, the group begins the storming stage. “The storming stage of team development is a period of high emotionality and tension among the group members. During this stage, hostility and infighting may occur, and the team typically experiences many changes” (Schermerhorn, 2010). Noticeably, hostility and fighting came from Mike and his perceptions about how the group was excluding him from meetings, which wasn’t an accurate perception. One could determine that if Mike would participate in the workload he could become a viable player in the team. Mike hasn’t performed to the degree as other group members have......

Words: 794 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Leadership Andorganizational Mgmt

...Leadership and Organizational Behavior Case Study 1 “The Forgotten Group Member” Andrea Watts Keller University Leadership and Organizational Behavior MGMT 591 Timothy Staley November 16, 2013 Group Development As I began reading the “Forgotten Group Member”, I found that the group is in the “storming” stage of team development. I am able to determine this due to the setting of the events laid out by the author. The setting gives the present then it goes back and tells that the team is in week 5 of the project. The author also gives some history about the “forming stage” and events that had occurred at that time. After reading a bit more, it is clear that the group is experiencing some tension and rebellion by one of its team members. Had Christine, understood the importance of understanding the stages of development, she could have laid a better foundation as team lead so that they could have avoided this cynical behavior and the energy and outcome of the project would have been better for all of those involved. Problem Identification The primary problem in the case study was that Christine had failed to set the proper expectations and orientation for the group and this caused her to lose respect of one of her peers. Mike had been able to manipulate Christine with excuses from the beginning. Unfortunately, Christine fell subject to his manipulative behavior and lost control of her team as a hold. In my opinion, the “forming” stage of team development is very......

Words: 611 - Pages: 3