Free Essay


In: Other Topics

Submitted By piggy0058
Words 2576
Pages 11
MIGUEL, Karl Ann D.

Freakonomics by Stephen Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner

Introduction: The Hidden Side of Everything

There are several things required to understand the world through economics: first, knowing the incentives of all parties; second, realizing that conventional wisdom is usually wrong; third, understanding that most effects have subtle and distant causes and the most obvious is often the wrong one; fourth, specialists like salesman and lawyers use obscure knowledge to achieve their own ends and the internet helps to erode this advantage by making knowledge more freely available to people; lastly, data is invaluable to understanding the world.

Chapter 1: What Do Schoolteachers and Sumo Wrestlers Have in Common?

People all learn to respond to incentives, whether positive or negative from the outset of life. An incentive is simply a means of urging people to do more of a good thing and less of a bad thing. There are three basic flavors of incentive: economic, social and moral. Economic incentive is something material or tangible; moral is based of self-judgments; social is terribly powerful as it depicts what other people think of you resulting from your own actions or choices. Any incentive is inherently a trade-off; whatever the incentive, whatever the situation, dishonest people will try to gain an advantage by whatever means necessary.

Cheating is a natural act getting more for less. The government required the High-Stakes Testing as part of the No Child Left Behind policy. A teacher whose students test poorly can be censured or passed over for a raise or promotion. To catch a cheater it helps to think like one. The Chicago public school system fired dozens of teachers for cheating. It is true that sports and cheating go hand in hand. Sumo, the national sport of Japan, is said to be less about competition than about honor itself. Sumo wrestlers are ranked according to complex schemes. The eight victory is very critical, the line between promotion and demotion and is four times as valuable in the rankings as the typical victory. The wrestlers made a quid pro quo agreement: you let me win today, when I really need the victory, and I’ll let you win the next time. Two former sumo wrestlers went public to expose the match rigging within their sport, but they died hours apart. Meanwhile, Paul Feldman conducted a bagel study several years ago. He concluded that people cheated more often during bad weather and around stressful holidays.

Chapter 2: How is the Ku Klux Klan Like a Group of Real-Estate Agents?

Contrary to conventional wisdom, lynching of blacks decreased because they became more submissive over time. Ku Klux Klan steeped in all sorts of ridiculous and complicated traditions and secrets and the leadership generated revenues from initiation fees, annual dues, “protection money” etc. They were powerful because they horded information that others could not access, that is exactly the same principle employed by the lawyers and real estate agents. Since information is power, they use information asymmetry, accepting that someone usually an expert knows more than someone else usually a consumer, to try and get higher prices for their services.

Chapter 3: Why Do Drug Dealers Still Live with Their Moms?

Experts’ words are not always correct, but are hard to hard. For example, there is a saying that there were about 3 million homeless Americans, but that sure seemed high. In addition, women’s rights advocates claims that one in three American women will be a victim of rape or attempted rape, though the actual figure is one in eight. The image of a wealth, armed drug dealer is also a myth created by advocates. A scholar, Sudhir Venkatesh, lived among a branch of a gang the “Black Gangster Disciple Nation.” There he found out about the cultural and hierarchal relationship of the crack industry for six years. He got a compilation of documents and budget reports of the gang and this revealed that there was indeed a lot of wealth if and only if you were a leader. Drug dealing is not very profitable for the majority of people especially if you’re part of the foot soldiers or those at the bottom of the pyramid.

The invention of the crack is a huge success. They found that mixing cocaine with baking soda and water produced tiny rocks of smokeable cocaine. Since crack is only a small amount of cocaine made stronger, it is relatively cheaper than cocaine, making it affordable among poor people. This, in turn, is the cause of disintegration of the family, which has been a source of morals and strength of people.

Chapter 4: Where Have All the Criminals Gone?

The crime rate began falling in the early 1990s. Experts are trying to explain the drop in crime. Thus, they formulated the following hypotheses about this: innovative policing strategies, increased reliance on prisons, changes in crack and other drug markets, aging of the population, tougher gun control laws, stronger economy and increased number of the police. The following showed the strongest link to the drop in crime: increased reliance on prison, changes in crack and the legalization of abortion.

The most important issue to understand concerning the rapid decline of crimes is the legalization of abortion. Mothers who are typically poor, uneducated, and are having serious problems are most likely to raise high numbers of criminal children. It is concluded that states with the highest abortion rates experienced the greatest crime drops, while states with low abortion rates experienced smaller crime drops.

Chapter 5: What Make a Perfect Parent?

Fear is a major component of parenting. A typical parenting expert puts forth extreme ideas that are very powerful and suggests danger to kids. Economic tools, regression analysis, for example, are used to figure out the role of various initiatives. Genetics plays an important role while child’s race is not important in determining a child’s future.

The following are the factors that has a strong correlation with test scores of a child: (a) child’s highly educated parents, (b) child’s parents high socioeconomic status, (c) child’s mother at the time of her first child’s birth, (d) child’s low birth weight, (e) child’s spoken language at home, (f) adoption of a child, (g) child’s parents involvement in the PTA, and (f) child’s number of books in his home. The list describes who the parents are: what genes they have, what their basic values are, and where they are in life.

Chapter 6: Perfect Parenting Part II; Or: Would a Roshanda by Any Other Name Smell as Sweet?

Blacks name their children very differently from everyone else, unlike whites, Asians and Hispanics, who name their children identically or little different. Black movement strives for a distinct identity, that’s why they use strange names. Parent’s socioeconomic status and education correlate with the names of their children. Chances are, a person with the white sounding name will enjoy a better life outcome because he is raised in a high standard background. One’s life outcome does not solely depend on one’s name, but actually on his background.

Reaction on Freakonomics

Freakonomics is a book written by Steven D. Leviit and Stephen J. Dubner explains “The Hidden Side of Everything” using economics where laypeople can easily understand. Unlike other books, there are a lot of topics tackled in the book that challenges the conventional wisdom of the readers. Unusual questions are used as chapter titles, where the authors also answer at the end of every chapter.

The first chapter entitled “What do schoolteacher and sumo wrestler have in common?” talks about how incentives work and affect persons’ behavior. Incentives do matter. When I was still in pre-school, my parents used to give me 100 pesos every time I get a hundred percent in my exams per subject. On the other hand, during weekends, I wasn’t allowed to go out of our house and play if and only if I can’t answer my mom’s questions about the topics discussed by my teachers for the week. The same works when I was in high school and in college. My parents would allow me to buy the things I want whenever I belong to the Dean’s List. Incentives do influenced my life in a good way. Incentives given by my parents made me do well in school and bring out the best of me. My parents always tell me that it’s okay if get not-so-high grades as long as they see that I work hard and not fail my subjects. Getting high grades is really a bonus that’s why they’re willing to give incentives. With that example, I could agree that incentives do really affect one’s behavior.

Next, second chapter “How is the Ku Klux Klan like a group of real estate agents?” looks at the power of information in markets. Information is very powerful in every aspect of one’s life. It is evident that one person knows better information about something than another party. This is what is pertained to in the book as “information asymmetry”. Most of the time, people were encouraged to buy something after an expert says that the product is really good and will really worth of our money. Knowing that they are experts, we usually accept what these experts say and believing their words are the only option that we have. We are unjustly enriched when these experts promote false information or hiding the true information about the product they are endorsing. My friends and other family members encountered the same incident regarding false information promoted by an expert, as they say. There is only one thing that I learned from their experiences; that is, to research or know more information about something in order for you to not be abused by others. Most people seek to profit not by normal means, but by exploiting this differential in information.

“Why do drug dealers still live with their moms?” is the third chapter, which talks about the “conventional wisdom” coined by John Kenneth Galbraith. Conventional wisdom is defined as the body of ideas or explanations generally accepted as true by the public or by experts in a field. Though widely held, they remained unexamined. I am one of the people, who think that every person who is engaged in a drug dealing business lives in a prosperous way. I learned that drug dealing is like any other business, where the persons in the highest level make the most money, while the “foot soldiers” or the ones who worked the most and the hardest struggle to make money close to minimum wage. The chapter reflects the income-gap and the immutable law of labor, as quoted from the book: “When there are a lot of people willing and able to do a job, that job generally doesn’t pay well.

The next chapter, “Where have all the criminals gone?” reveals the effect of legalized abortion, its impact on crime. The authors mentioned that there is a trade-off off more abortion with less crime. In my opinion, abortion itself is classified as a crime, a violent one. Killing an innocent child with a future ahead of him/her is really an immoral act. For a Catholic like me, life is really valuable. What if the aborted child will be one of those who will discover a cure for HIV? Or, what if the child will be the next president of the Philippines who will bring change in our country? These thoughts may be some of the things that are running through the minds of those who don’t want to legalize abortion especially here in the Philippines. Contrary to the questions earlier, I really asked myself, is it still immoral if the aborted child will be a criminal if he/she will be alive? Predicting the future of a child is a hard thing to do. In my opinion, why forbid a parent from aborting a child if the parents cannot give the child sufficient care and basic needs? On the other hand, I still believe that allocating the resources properly is the answer to this societal problem that leads not only for lessening crimes but also reducing the number of poor people.

Then, the chapter “What makes a perfect parent?” answers different questions like “Do parents matter?” This chapter is what struck me the most. Of course, parents do matter. I agree on what is said in the book that fear is a major act of parenting. I believe that no parent wants his/her newborn to be hurt. A lot of parents spend a lot of their energy and money just because they are scared. Reflecting about this chapter, I remember my parents when I asked them to allow me participating in a karate competition when I was 9. At first, they don’t, but after some time they allowed me because I indeed do want to join. That was my first time, so my parents, especially my mom, were really scared for me. Luckily, I won, but I got hit in the face giving me black marks on my cheeks and nose. Since then, my mom did allow me to continue my sport, in one condition: she will not watch any of my matches, though she will come after the tournament. In that way, I could understand that she still supports me in whatever I want to do, but the fear that her daughter will get hurt is still evident in that case. In the eyes of the children, parents are maybe overreacting, but we should understand that our parents are just thinking about us, our welfare.

Meanwhile, the last chapter “Perfect parenting part 2: Would a Roshanda by any other name smell as sweet?” discusses a view of parenting using economic aspects. It focuses on the economic implications on the children’s names especially for the white Americans and the African-Americans. I never thought that even the names of children would really reflect the economic gap between the whites and blacks. I believe that choosing the child’s name is one of the first things that parents should really think about, the name that their child would use until they grow old. My parents’ priest friend suggested that my mom and dad should get the names of their children from the names of religious saints that’s why my big brother’s name is Paul Michael, from Saint Paul and Saint Michael. It is good that I know the history of my brother’s name, but for my name? I don’t know where my parents get mine. I am usually mistaken to be a guy because both my first and last names pertain to a guy. My name reflects my personality: I depict a strong aura from the outside, but when I’m alone I also breakdown and wish that all will come back the way it used to be.

Overall, I find the book to be an interesting one. Though I am not a person who reads book a lot, I was able to learn a lot especially that the author used economic examples, which I think made me understand the contents more since I am a business student. The book made me see things differently, and I never thought of asking the similar questions probed in the different chapters of the book. It really is an eye-opener for me on what is really happening in the society.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay


...Freakonomics, Steven D. Levitt, Stephen J. Dubner "(Feldman wondered if perhaps the executives cheated out of an overdeveloped sense of entitlement.What he didn't consider is that perhaps cheating was how they got to be executives.)... If morality represents the way we would like the world to work and economics represents how it actually does work, then the story of Feldman's bagel business lies at the very intersection of morality and economics"(46)Levitt, and Dubner. Levitt implements his first rhetorical device, diction, through the use of the phrase "overdeveloped sense of entitlement", this shows that the belief of the author, was that they were stealing simply because they felt that their higher social status made it ok. However the connotation that comes with the word "entitlement" under the circumstances it is used makes me think of more of a snobby stereotypical movie rich persona, such that in a typical celebrity matter they feel that they are in fact above the law.The second thing he does is use italics to emphasize the word "be", the purpose of emphasizing be in this case is to show the contrasting in between his ideas, and of the Feldman, the business man. It also seems to shine an eerie light on to the fact that perhaps, the cheating to get ahead in the corporate ladder was the same principle they applied to stealing the bagels, it was ok, as long as they didn't get caught. Levitt's final rhetorical device was a metaphor when he says " If morality represents......

Words: 461 - Pages: 2

Free Essay


...Freakonomics The book, Freakonomics by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner, addresses a variety of questions that one may not typically ask. From finding connections between school teachers and sumo wrestlers to addressing the issue of crime through legalizing abortion, this book provides an interesting perspective on issues and real life situations, one that most people are not unable to make out at first sight. Firstly, Levitt attempts to analyze the issue of crime which has become relatively commonplace in the early 1990's. A generation of young teenage criminals have arisen and roamed the streets, threatening to create all kinds of pandemonium. This increase of crime rates led many criminologists, political scientists, and forecasters to believe that there will continue to be a spike in murders by teenagers in the upcoming years. Surprisingly, the opposite held true and crime deteriorated at a fast rate. Here, Levitt unravels the misconception that the roaring 1990s economy, proliferation of gun control laws, and innovative policing strategies did not contribute to the plummet of crime rates. Rather, we need to shift our attention to the legalization of abortion laws which, according to Levitt, what was actually led to the decrease of crime rates. Levitt draws the connection between crime rates and legalizing abortion by introducing a young Dallas woman named Norma McCorvey, who had already given up her two children for adoption but found herself pregnant once again....

Words: 948 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay


...FREAKONOMICS A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything Revised and Expanded Edition Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner CONTENTS AN EXPLANATORY NOTE In which the origins of this book are clarified. vii PREFACE TO THE REVISED AND EXPANDED EDITION xi 1 INTRODUCTION: The Hidden Side of Everything In which the book’s central idea is set forth: namely, if morality represents how people would like the world to work, then economics shows how it actually does work. Why the conventional wisdom is so often wrong . . . How “experts”— from criminologists to real-estate agents to political scientists—bend the facts . . . Why knowing what to measure, and how to measure it, is the key to understanding modern life . . . What is “freakonomics,” anyway? 1. What Do Schoolteachers and Sumo Wrestlers Have in Common? 15 In which we explore the beauty of incentives, as well as their dark side—cheating. Contents Who cheats? Just about everyone . . . How cheaters cheat, and how to catch them . . . Stories from an Israeli day-care center . . . The sudden disappearance of seven million American children . . . Cheating schoolteachers in Chicago . . . Why cheating to lose is worse than cheating to win . . . Could sumo wrestling, the national sport of Japan, be corrupt? . . . What the Bagel Man saw: mankind may be more honest than we think. 2. How Is the Ku Klux Klan Like a Group of Real-Estate Agents? 49 In which it is argued that nothing is more powerful than information,...

Words: 105214 - Pages: 421

Premium Essay

Freakonomics Summary

...Working paper Summarization The term Asymmetric information is defined as the unequal knowledge possessed by the parties to a market transaction. Information is crucial for buyers and sellers in the business world today, and sometimes the buyers don’t always have all the information. The second chapter in the book FREAKONOMICS tells us how individuals, organizations, and businesses often exploit their access to crucial information at the expenses of others. The KKK used to be a very profitable organization in America until the 1940’s. Stenson Kennedy had a hatred for the Klan, and in the 1940’s joined the KKK to exploit the Klan’s secrets. What Kennedy found was the Klan was a slick moneymaking organization for those near the top of the organization. The Klan had a number of revenue sources: thousands of dues from membership fees, businesses that would hire the Klan to scare off unions, or pay the Klan protection money, and Klan rallies that generated huge cash donations. When Kennedy discovered this he wrote a letter to the governor of Georgia requesting the charter be revoked. The reason for this was the Klan had been designated a non profit organization, but Kennedy had proof it was clearly devoted to profit. Kennedy still wasn’t getting the desired affect he wanted because even though this would damage the clan in Georgia there would still be other clans around the country that wouldn’t be hurt. He then decided to turn to the radio, once he knew the secrets of......

Words: 1248 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay


...Segregation” (Levitt) (Freakonomics ). There are names that are different between African American and Caucasians but, none of these shouldn’t define you as a person or create a image for yourself. First, does your name cause a problem in the work force? According to Levitt and Dubner, they created a experiment by typing up 5000 of the same resume and just changing the names to half caucasion names to the other half African American names. The resume were sent out to companies acrossed from Chicago and New York. 33% African American names are less likely to get an interview then a Caucasian name. When someone is looking for a job with a Casucasin name in ten weeks they are most likely to get a job but if an African American would take fifteen weeks being unemployed. (Freakonomics ) When African Amercians can get an opportunity in the work force they generally earn less compared to a Caucasians person. As giving your child a name that is “Uneek” can be harder for them in the work force. Also, can living in a different society or coming from a different background change the view on your name? In the 50s African American had basic names such as John or Micheal and etc.,but the Black Power movement began in the 80s and wanted African American to define who they were so they started to make names up so people would realize who they were. Parents that were unmarried and had lower education was most likely to name their child with an unique name (Freakonomics ). But when......

Words: 889 - Pages: 4

Free Essay


...Freakonomics Key Terms​ : Conventional Wisdom​ : Explanations generally accepted as true. Correlation​ : Relationship between two or more things which change (variables) and can be described mathematically; Refers to how closely sets of information or data are related. For example: Smoking has a high correlation with lung cancer. Freakonomics​ : Study of economics based on the principle of incentives. Incentives​ means of urging to do more of a good thing or less of a bad thing. :A The Authors identify three kinds: 1. ​ Economic Incentives​person responds in the marketplace – 2. ​ Social Incentives​motivate people to respond in a certain way – because they care (or are worried) about how they’ll be viewed by others 3. ​ Moral Incentives​appeal to a person’s sense of right versus wrong – Informational Asymmetry​ : Situation in which one party has more information than the other party. Snob Effect​ : The desired to own exclusive or unique goods. The demand increases as the price increases. Freakonomics​ provided me with concrete illustrations of how unconventional methods of data collection and analysis are often necessary to make sense of the world. Knowing what to measure (and how to measure) data makes a complicated world ... somewhere less complicated. As I read the dumbstrucking ​ Freakonomics, ​ I found this quote, “If you learn how to look at data in the right way, you can explain riddles that otherwise might have seemed impossible...

Words: 1657 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Xvc Cost of Soemthing

...The Value of Curiosity- Exploring the Hidden Side of Everything Freakonomics, by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner, is an important economical book that shows examples of economics that most people do not understand or realize. This book displays the value of incentives, how the average consumer does not know much about the markets they buy in, cause and effects of these markets, and showing the distrust in most experts. To me, it proves that an average person can’t really look at the economic trends of a lot of markets because the patterns and information are so deep, that the average consumer can’t just ‘dig’ up. Freakonomics allows hidden information and small things that mean so much to come to surface, so the economy that surrounds us can be better understood for a more promising financial future. In chapter one, Levitt and Dubner really focus on incentives. Incentives are the motivator in which I do everything in my life. Sometimes incentives strike negative behavior in people because the amount of power in the motivation. In the chapter, they demonstrate three examples of this bad behavior. The remainder of this chapter brings together schoolteachers, sumo wrestlers, and a bagel salesman. The school teachers are under so much pressure to present excellent grade scores by their students in order to look good in front of the state, that they lose focus in the actual importance. Teachers begin to teach for a test and not for the benefit of the children’s futures. I......

Words: 1029 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Freaky Economimcs

...Langstaff Hnrs Economics Critical Analysis March 11, 2013 Freaky Economimcs Which is more dangerous, a gun or a swimming pool? What do schoolteachers and sumo wrestlers have in common? Why do drug dealers still live with their moms? How much do parents really matter? Why am I asking you all of these seemingly irrelevant questions? Well I’ll tell you why, because to economists Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, these questions aren’t irrelevant at all. “The conventional wisdom is often wrong” (Levitt Dunbar 14) so Levitt looks at the economy in a very unconventional way. Often times, the study of economics is seen as dry, boring, and consisting of mind numbing numbers, uninteresting financial trends, and statistics. Yet in Freakonomics Levitt and Dubner make it interesting, and dare I say, funny. They show us that economics is the study of incentives and how people get what they want, or need, and especially when other people want or need the same thing. I’m very fond of the idea that there is no one cause for an effect. I believe that there are multiple tiny causes that build up over time and then suddenly, and oddly to many people’s surprise, you have this looming and terrible effect. So I was a bit put off at how Levitt only offers one cause for some of the arguments he tries to make. He even says himself in the introduction that, "If you learn how to look at data in the right way, you can explain riddles that otherwise might have seemed impossible.”......

Words: 545 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Discrimination in the Workplace

...discrimination has been around for years. However, there are laws that try to protect employees from that type of behavior today. The Employment Non-Discrimination Act (EDNA) prohibits discrimination in the workplace based on gender, race, disability, and recently included, sexual orientation (Anonymous, 2009). Yet despite existing laws about discrimination, many employees still suffer from some type of discrimination or harassment in the workplace. I will discuss the most common types of discrimination and some solutions that may work in your organization. Sexism is still prevalent even in 2009. For example co-authors Levitt and Dubner were featured on ABC’s 20/20 promoting their new book called Super Freakonomics which is the sequel to their original book called Freakonomics. On the show Steven Levitt stated that, “Women’s liberation has been great for high end prostitutes but not for our children.”(2009) Levitt and Dubner believe that in the 1940’s, more than half of Americas brightest women were schoolteachers. Now they have gone on to become doctors, lawyers, and bankers. Therefore, teachers are now left up people that are not as qualified. Levitt stated that successful women with MBA’s end up marrying men with MBA’s and staying home. This is the reason they are not paid as well. They believe that men are motivated by money and women are motivated by families. The authors go on to say that it is not discrimination that caused the “glass ceiling”, it is motivation.......

Words: 804 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

They Say I Say

...They Say/I Say Journal 1 Subject: Freakonomics Chapter 1 “School Teachers and Sumo Wrestlers” They Say: In this chapter the author, Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, define the economic as root to pursue of incentives. The author define an incentive as “a means of urging people to do more of a good thing of a bad thing”. Sometimes these incentives are so irresistible that people are driven to obtain them through a bad behavior. In addition the authors describe some circumstances of cheating. There is an analysis of data to detect some cheating patterns. The most prominent cases are included the Chicago public schools teacher who changed answers on their students’ test, and Japanese sumo wrestlers who conspired to discard certain high stakes matches. Basically the main point of this chapter analyzed different scenarios to explain that humans always are looking for incentives. These incentive are categorized as economic, social, and moral. All of this, are explained in a different scenarios starting with the situation of the day care and finalized with the business man who run a bagel business. The author focused at the end explaining that humans are honest even when no one is watching them. I say: I am completely agreed with the ideas described by the author in this chapter related how human behavior depends of the incentives. To better understanding of these behavior the author states that: “economists love incentives....The typical economist believes the world...

Words: 434 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay


...What is Freakonomics? Freakonomics is an interesting book that evokes a thoughtful and provocative analysis of human motivation and modern living. It shows you a common world through a totally different pair of lens. The author uses the raw data of economics to ask imaginative questions while it forces the reader to think cleverly and divertingly of the answers. His approach to economics was done in a very unconventional way- as a smart, curious explorer parallel to Christopher Columbus when he discovered the Americas. There is not one common theme in Freakonomics, instead the book is structured around four essential ideas: incentives are the basis of modern life, conventional wisdom is often wrong, dramatic effects often have distant (even subtle) causes, and experts use their information advantage to serve their own interests. Each consequent chapter is titled with an intriguing question, such as, “what do school teachers and sumo wrestlers have in common” and then answers are provided based on Levitt’s economic research and analysis. One of the primary points emphasized in Freakonomics is that economics is essentially the study of incentives; why people behave in certain ways and how they benefit from the things that they do. The authors explain that there are mainly three varieties of incentives that motivate human decision-making: moral, financial, and social. When people make decisions based on moral incentives they are doing what they feel is “the right......

Words: 854 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay


...Is there a causal link between the drastic crime-drop , at the turn of the millennium , to the remote event of the legalization of abortion in the mid 90 's ? Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner would have us believe , in their movie Freakonomics , that there is a statistically definable and clear relationship between the decision of the Supreme Court in Roe v .Wade and the reduction of criminality In brief , they posit that the legalization of abortion in the 70 's set into motion a chain of causal events which would eventually lead to a dramatic decrease in criminal incidence and crime rates in the last twenty years . The argument is buttressed by the fact that the statistical data in the rise of legalized abortion appear to militate criminal incidence throughout the country .
 In the decision of the Court , the majority believe that the woman has the right to decide whether or not to continue with the pregnancy .However , such right is not absolute since the moment the first trimester ends , the State acquires the right to prevent or intervene with such 
decision by the mother because of a valid compelling state interest . At any rate , the Supreme Court reveals that this will help reduce the incidence of bearing unwanted children and causing more trauma for both the mother and the child in the long run . Levitt and Dubner , on the 
hand , added color into this line of argument by stretching the correlation of unwanted children to either the rise or fall of crime. The less...

Words: 475 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Suggested Reading

...Suggested Reading List This section wouldn’t be complete without a list of some great books to read. Reading about reading and answering test questions is fine, but the best way to improve your reading ability is to read.This list is compiled by category.Help yourself. Choose one from the list, pick it up at a local bookstore or library, open the cover, and enjoy. Autobiography/Memoir Angela’s Ashes by Frank McCourt Autobiography of Malcolm X by Malcolm X Black Boy by Richard Wright The Diary of Anne Frank by Anne Frank Having Our Say by Sarah L. and Elizabeth Delany The Heroic Slave by Frederick Douglass I Know Why the Caged Birds Sing by Maya Angelou Reading Lolita in Tehran: A Memoir in Books by Azar Nafisi Coming of Age The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger The House on Mango Street by Sandra Cisneros A Separate Peace by John Knowles Detective/Thriller Agatha Christie’s murder mysteries The “A is for…” series by Sue Grafton The Client by John Grisham Sherlock Holmes by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle The Shining by Stephen King Watcher by Dean R. Koontz Fantasy The Hobbit by J.R.R. Tolkien On a Pale Horse by Piers Anthony Any Harry Potter book by J.K. Rowling Historical/Social Issues The Clan of the Cave Bear by Jean M. Auel The Color Purple by Alice Walker The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time by Mark Haddon Everything is Illuminated by Jonathan Safran Foer To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee The Lord of the Flies by William......

Words: 713 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Rhetorical Devices in Freakonomics

...Lucy Dineen Ms. Remmey Freakonomics Assignment August 2015 Argument: What Do Schoolteachers and Sumo Wrestlers Have in Common? Based on Paul Feldman’s findings, the authors of Freakonomics argue that a person, who is faced with an efficient way to cheat, will not necessarily choose to. The data involved in Feldman’s accidental bagel study proves that not all humans are corrupt. However, their tendency to cheat alters based on several factors, such as the characteristics of the person, the value of the incentive, and the impact of the setting on the person’s mood. 1. Metaphor- “He had thrown off the shackles of cubicle life and made himself happy.” (Levitt/Dubner 45) 2. Juxtaposition- “But in the big-office/small-office comparison, bagel crime seems to mirror street crime. There is far less street crime per capita in rural areas than in cities, in large part because a rural criminal is more likely to be known (and therefore caught).” (Levitt/Dubner 46) 3. Allusion- “Because many of Feldman’s customers are affiliated with the national security, there may have been a patriotic element to this 9/11 effect.”......

Words: 1309 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Freakonomics Reaction Paper

...Reaction Paper Freakonomics: Documentary Emmanuel S. Garcia Managerial Economics Land Bank of the Philippines Freakonomics was a good way to introduce the basic concepts of economics applied in everyday living and what we can learn from that. It primary aim seems to open the eyes of the general public to the fact that economics should be a conscious part of our way of life. Generally, what it says is that economics is a good tool in understanding and eventually helping us decide important aspects of our day to day living. The innovative ideas presented in the various segments tries to alter a lot of perspectives on how we think. At the end of it all, it leaves one with the thought that "conventional wisdom" is not what we thought it was. For example, it was interesting to note how the principle "Rational people think at the margin" was discussed in the movie as a real estate example. Explained in layman's terms, agents tend to advice homeowners to sell their house even at a lower price if the marginal benefit for the agent is low. The documentary demonstrated the pervasiveness of incentives in society. I agree to Levitt and Dubner’s premise that it is commonly accepted that for most people, given the right price or the right incentive, 1. cheating will always be considered by the most affected people as an option 2. there will always be a desire to maximize the incentive 3. certain behaviors could be changed. The first premise was elaborated further on the......

Words: 939 - Pages: 4