Free Essay

Free Will vs Fate

In: English and Literature

Submitted By vanessaad9
Words 2202
Pages 9
The tension between free will and destiny:
Which one is more powerful?
‘I would say that there are three main questions: One, do people have free will? Two, is determinism true? And three, are free will and determinism compatible? ’
Throughout history, human beings have always tried to be the ones who have the power to rule their own lives. However, there exists a debate which questions whether that is really possible or not. In other words: are human beings capable of deciding what to do with their lives or is there a greater force that rules over our destiny?
The Oxford English Dictionary defines destiny as ‘that which is destined or fated to happen to a particular person, country, institution, etc. (…).’ Consequently, this term is opposed to free will, defined as ‘the power of an individual to make free choices, not determined by divine predestination, the laws of physical causality, fate, etc. (…).’ Human beings have thought of these antithetic concepts as something to worry about since the beginning of civilization. Because of that, playwrights have taken them into consideration when writing different plays all over the years.
This essay seeks to explore the tension existing between the concepts of destiny and free will in the world of drama through the study of language as well as the analysis of character and situation development. In order to carry this research out, I will take Oedipus Rex by Sophocles (429 BC) and Dr Faustus by Christopher Marlowe (1604) as the basis for the analysis. Although the plays were written in different eras and consequently were inspired by very different social and historical backgrounds, the limits between destiny and free will play a very important role in both of them. But how does drama manage to explore this tension? How do playwrights convey the paradox that exists between destiny and free will?
Over the course of the years, theatre ―always engaged with social worries and beliefs― has been concerned about the paradox of free will and destiny. This question is always studied from a dualistic point of view: it is whether free will or destiny that has the power to decide what will happen in one’s life, it seems that there cannot be anything else in between.
Two clear examples of this paradoxical duality are Oedipus Rex and Dr Faustus. Both plays narrate the story of a character who goes through diverse situations and tries to overcome different circumstances only to see his downfall at the end of the story. It could be argued that both plays present a character whose ending is already predetermined by destiny or fate. However, they seem to look at this ambiguous topic in a different way.
On the one hand, we will analyse Oedipus Rex. This play is an example of classic tragedy. It was written in a period in which Ancient Greece citizens believed that there were different gods who “reigned” over each aspect of their lives. Following Jon D. Mikalson, these gods were believed to be immortal and responsible for everyone’s destiny. Bearing that in mind, we can say that the fact that Sophocles wrote Oedipus Rex in a very theocentric context affected the way in which the tension between destiny and free will was conveyed, whether the Greek playwright was aware of it or not.
In this play, we can observe how Oedipus, since the moment that he was born, goes through diverse crucial events that change his life in one way or another. In each situation, the king of Thebes has to make different decisions which ultimately lead him to what destiny had already predetermined for him. In order to explore the tension between free will and destiny, we need to analyse both sides of the coin in each of these situations.
It is very important to highlight the fact that the Greek society firmly believed that one’s personal traits affected how life would treat you; in other words: the way you acted would define your destiny. One of Oedipus’ most remarkable characteristic was his desire for knowledge. Throughout the play, Oedipus is always looking for answers. He needs to find the reason why his city is going through such a terrible situation. In order to get such answers, he is constantly asking Tiresias, the Oracle, the messenger, etc. for information. All of them, in one way or another, try to stop him. But he chooses not to stop. We can find an example of this when he is speaking with Tiresias:
Tiresias: What will come will come.
Even if I shroud it all in silence.
Oedipus: What will come? You’re bound to tell me that.
Tiresias: I’ll say no more. Do as you like (…)
With his own decisions, he blindly walked into his downfall. Should he have chosen to stop looking for answers, maybe he could have changed his own destiny. But he was so eager for knowledge that he could not see that it would bring him to his own destruction.
The battle between destiny and free will begins when Oedipus is born. Laius and Jocasta ―Oedipus’ biological parents― are given a prophecy which says that the new-born will kill his father and marry his mother. In order to escape the prophecy, they decide to get rid of their baby and ask someone to kill him before the prophecy became reality. With their free will, they were just trying to solve a problem. However, although they tried to remove Oedipus from their lives, we can say that destiny brings him back and he ends up doing what the prophecy had predicted. If Laius and Jocasta’s decision had been different, if they had kept their son, everything could have been different. But, here, destiny seems to be more powerful that individual choice-making.
We can also see the essential role of fate in the play when Oedipus explained what he did once he reached the crossroads. The path he chose led him to kill his father, although he was not aware of it. As Oedipus says:
Oedipus: (…) Short work, by god―with one of the staff in this right hand I knock him out of his high seat, roll him out of the wagon, sprawling headlong―
I killed them all (…)”
Oedipus Rex is an example of how drama uses the development of characters and situations to explore the tension between free will and destiny. Throughout the entire play, we can see how every important event can be looked at with different perspectives. Altogether, we can see how every aspect in Oedipus’ life was influenced by both his fate and his decisions. Thus we can conclude that one can make his own decisions, but cannot easily scape fate.
On the other hand, we have Dr Faustus. As Paul Moliken maintains in his edition of Dr Faustus, the play “is a product of the Renaissance―a time of rebirth from the Medieval period.” Dr Faustus was ―an continues to be― considered as one of the most controversial plays outside the Shakespeare canon because it contains allusions to the constant fight between the good and the bad. Apart from the latter, one of the most remarkable aspects about this play is the tension between free will and predetermination and how it is explored.
Regarding this topic, there are two main interpretations: those who maintain that Faustus could have chosen to repent and change his destiny and those who claim that he was predetermined to follow the wrong path. Throughout the play, we can discern some dialogues that support both theories:
The ones who maintain that Faustus is free to choose, as Bara Deats points out, rely on the fact that the Good Angel and the Old Man make him see that what he has been doing is not right and that he has the chance to repent:
Good Angel. Sweet Faustus, leave that execrable art.
Faustus. Contrition, prayer, repentance? What of these?
Good Angel. O, they are means to bring thee unto heaven. Old Man. O gentle Faustus, leave this damned art,
This magic, that will charm thy soul to hell,
And quite bereave thee of salvation.
Though thou hast now offended like a man,
Do not persever in it like a devil.
The ones who claim that Faustus’ destiny could not have been changed support the “Calvinist orientation of Reformation theology”, which says that one is predetermined to go to Heaven or Hell and, consequently, free will is merely an illusion.
We can find a very clear example of this tension between free will and fate if we compare the two text of the play. While in text A the Good Angel says to Faustus: “Never too late, if Faustus can repent”, in text B the modal verb changes: “Never too late, if Faustus will repent”, assuming that Faustus is free to make the choice.
This play gives us an example of how drama uses language to express the limits between fate and individual choice-making, mainly with the introduction of dialogues between Faustus and his “conscience” (the Good and Bad Angels). Many critics actually defend that Marlowe’s intention in this play was to express and exploit this tensions, because he “offers no solution to our dilemma, even though he so masterfully explores it.”
Apart from Oedipus Rex and Dr Faustus, numerous plays have thoroughly explored the tension between free will and destiny or fate in different ways. For instance, in Romeo and Juliet, written by William Shakespeare, the reader is shown how destiny shapes the protagonists’ lives. We can see how all of their decisions seem to change the course of events but they actually lead them to their ultimate predetermined fate.
Antigone, by Sophocles, is another example of how important this dichotomy is. In this play, as in Oedipus Rex, the tension between destiny and individual choices is one of the central themes. The Greek playwright tries to balance both of them: some of the actions are the result of individual choices while others are related to fate, but, once again, it seems that fate is responsible for most of the tragic events of the play.
Either by using the power of language and the development of characters and situations in different ways or by confronting free will and destiny, many playwrights have tried to answer what seems to be an unanswerable question so far. In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, it is said that ‘[m]en at some time are masters of their fates.’ Whether that is possible or not is what drama has explored in different plays all over the years regarding social and religious debates amongst others, as we can see in Oedipus Rex and Dr Faustus.

Bibliography
Bevington, David M, and Eric Rasmussen, Doctor Faustus A- And B- Texts (1604, 1616) (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1993)
Deats, Sara Munson, Doctor Faustus: A Critical Guide (London: Continuum, 2010)
Logan, Terence P, and Denzell S Smith, The Predecessors Of Shakespeare (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1973)
Marlowe, Christopher, The Tragical History Of Doctor Faustus (Clayton, Del.: Prestwick House, 2007)
Mikalson, Jon D, Honor Thy Gods: Popular Religion in Greek Tragedy (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1991)
OED.com, ‘Home: Oxford English Dictionary’, 1663 <http://www.oed.com> [accessed 8 April 2015]
Ritchie, Brian B, The Plays Of Christopher Marlowe And George Peele ([Parkland, Fla.]: Dissertation.com, 1999)
Shakespeare, William, and David M Bevington, Julius Caesar (Toronto: Bantam, 1988)
Williams, Clifford, Free Will and Determinism: A Dialogue (Indianapolis: Hackett Pub. Co., 1980)

--------------------------------------------
[ 1 ]. Philosophical doctrine which claims that human action is not free but determined by external forces.
[ 2 ]. Clifford Williams, Free Will and Determinism: A Dialogue (Indianapolis: Hackett Pub. Co., 1980), p. 3.
[ 3 ]. OED.com, ‘Home: Oxford English Dictionary’, 1663 [accessed 8 April 2015] .
[ 4 ]. Jon D. Mikalson, Honor Thy Gods: Popular Religion in Greek Tragedy (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1991), pp. 205-207.
[ 5 ]. Sophocles, Robert Fagles and Bernard Knox, The Three Theban Plays (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1984), pg. 178.
[ 6 ]. Sophocles, Robert Fagles and Bernard Knox, The Three Theban Plays (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1984), pg. 206.
[ 7 ]. Christopher Marlowe, The Tragical History Of Doctor Faustus (Clayton, Del.: Prestwick House, 2007), p. 9.
[ 8 ]. Terence P. Logan and Denzell S. Smith, The Predecessors Of Shakespeare (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1973), p. 14.
[ 9 ]. Sara Munson Deats, Doctor Faustus: A Critical Guide (London: Continuum, 2010), pg. 32.
[ 10 ]. David M Bevington and Eric Rasmussen, Doctor Faustus A- And B- Texts (1604, 1616) (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1993), pg. 11.
[ 11 ]. David M Bevington and Eric Rasmussen, Doctor Faustus A- And B- Texts (1604, 1616) (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1993), pg. 43.
[ 12 ]. Sara Munson Deats, Doctor Faustus: A Critical Guide (London: Continuum, 2010), pg. 32.
[ 13 ]. David M Bevington and Eric Rasmussen, Doctor Faustus A- And B- Texts (1604, 1616) (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1993), pg. 16.
[ 14 ]. David M Bevington and Eric Rasmussen, Doctor Faustus A- And B- Texts (1604, 1616) (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1993), pg. 16.
[ 15 ]. Brian B Ritchie, The Plays Of Christopher Marlowe And George Peele ([Parkland, Fla.]: Dissertation.com, 1999), pg. 302.
[ 16 ]. William Shakespeare and David M Bevington, Julius Caesar (Toronto: Bantam, 1988), pg. 21.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Oedipus Rex Fate Vs Free Will

...The Idea of escaping fate is a great way of looking at this text and I feel you make a good argument of Oedipus as a tragic figure. Fate does seem determined to make Oedipus follow the path laid out for him. As you mention, Oedipus is attempting to resist fate. His destiny being revealed to him, he leaves what he believes to be his father and mother never to see them again in an effort to keep the prophecy from coming true. Unfortunately, this action leads Oedipus directly into alignment with the events that would bring about his murdering his true father and having children with his mother. Once your fate is set there is no way out. The tragic part of the text is not necessarily his fate, but how it unfolds. He inadvertently propels...

Words: 295 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Hamlet Fate Vs Free Will Essay

...life goes is according to fate or free will? Some people lives are controlled by fate, however, some are controlled simply by your own choice of free will. Free Will, is “The power of acting without the constraint of necessity or fate; the ability to act at one’s own discretion” (Oxford Dictionaries). Free will allows a person to take action in any case of alternatives without a sense of obligation, but by their own chosen decisions. However, Fate is “The development of events outside a person’s control, regarded as predetermined by a supernatural power” (Oxford Dictionaries). Fate is the progressive unchanging flow of actions and events, predestined and guaranteed by a higher order or deity, in a person’s life that no one can change. For example, in the drama stories of Sophocles “Oedipus the King” and William Shakespeare’s “Hamlet”. One of the two stories will show Fate while the other demonstrates Free Will. Oedipus and Hamlet’s life may seem alike as they both wanted what was best for their people and for their loved ones. However, Oedipus’s life...

Words: 1217 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Oedipus Rex Fate Vs Free Will

...Merriam Webster defines free will as “the power of acting without the constraint of necessity or fate; the ability to act at one's own discretion.” Fate is a development of events beyonds a person’s control. These ideas are exactly what Sophocles is challenging is his play Oedipus Rex. In Oedipus Rex the protagonist Oedipus is trying to figure who killed the former king Laius, not realizing he was the killer himself. Oedipus was destined to kill his father and marry his mother. Throughout the play, Oedipus is torn between accepting the prophecy or choosing his own destiny. Despite his best effort, the prophecy laid out for him came true. Oedipus Rex uses symbolism to illustrate the theme that one can never escape fate. One symbol used in Oedipus Rex is the scars on his feet. It represent the suffering he has endured and will keep on enduring. In the play Oedipus finds out from a messenger that his adopted father Polybus is dead. The messenger explains how long ago he found a baby on Mount Cithaeron with its...

Words: 621 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Fate vs Freewill

...Fate vs. Freewill Name Institution Introduction The question on what determines our actions or what determines the way we act in real life situation has been one of the most complex issues in the history of mankind. This is because there are diverse opinions among people on what determines our actions. Some people believe that human actions are determined by freewill. On the other hand, some people believe that human actions are determined by fate (Tucker, 1993). Indeed, a question of what determines human actions has baffled not only philosophers, but also the religious people, and different opinions are given with regard to the Fate vs. Freewill debate. First, there are those who strongly believe that human actions are determined by fate and this group normally comprise of religious people. For instance, they believe that God did not only create the universe, but He is also responsible for whatever is happening in the universe. In other words, they have a strong believe that whatever happens in human life is due to God’s will (Tucker, 1993). On the other hand, the proponents of freewill as a determinant of human actions believe that human beings are exclusively responsible for what happen in their own life. This is because everybody has the freedom to do what he/she wants and bear responsibilities of their actions. In other words, people who believe in freewill think of life as random and that there is nothing like destiny (Tucker, 1993). In addition, there are...

Words: 627 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Free Will In Oedipus The King

...The Merriam Webster dictionary defines fate as an inevitable and often adverse outcome, condition, or end. This therefore goes against the definition of free will, the ability to make choices that are not controlled by fate or God.This is a constant theme in Oedipus the King where we question if his path was pre-determined or chosen willingly. “Listen to me and learn some peace of mind:no skill in the world,nothing human can penetrate the future.”(780-782; Fagles). This is a quote derived from Jocasta who is Oedipus’ wife and mother, and she supports the idea where our paths and destiny were already chosen. Throughout this play we learn which one truly prevails. “Fate was the will of the gods, a reality that could not be opposed, ritually...

Words: 1206 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

What Role Does Fate Play In The Iliad

...What Controls the Outcome? The outcome of the war: Is it controlled by the actions of mere mortals? Do the gods determine the successes and failures? Is the outcome solely a matter of fate? Some may believe that mortals have free will, but after a quick skim of the Iliad, this belief is clearly shown to be false. Humans are not given control over their destinies; however, if this is true, then what are these destinies controlled by? Fate seems to be the only answer, yet, can fate alone stop a god from changing outcomes for their personal gain? In the Iliad, gods and humans are shown to have a varying degree of control on the outcome of human life and death. The true controller of the outcome of success vs. failure, and life vs. death, will be analyzed with...

Words: 959 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Macbeths Actions Led to His Own Demise

...Macbeth is a play that adheres to a typical Elizabethan tragedy, which follows the journey of a   noble protagonist, who is flawed in some way, placed in a demanding situation, ending with a  fatal conclusion. On the same note, hamartia and hubris qualities deem Macbeth himself to be  the ultimate tragic hero, flawed with erupting ambition. Macbeth is an ever evolving character  who loses his nobility to acts of murder. ‘The higher you are the harder you fall’ governs  Macbeth  his fall is a result of his own actions. Paradoxical themes of Ambition Vs. Power,  Appearance Vs. Reality and Fate vs. Free Will, dictate the future and irrational decisions made  by the tragic hero. It is evident that through Macbeth’s murderous actions, in Act 2 Scene 1, Act  3 Scene 4 and Act 5 Scene 8 that he finds it hard to restrain himself, causing him to escape his  moral compass.  Macbeth’s insanity manifests his downfall which is plagued by his love for  Lady Macbeth, his belief in the prophecy, fate and ultimately his tragic flaw of ambition.    Undoubtedly, Macbeth’s own actions lead to psychological torment and the degradation of his  moral sensibilities. In Act 2 Scene 1, Macbeth’s soliloquy reveals his true thoughts and feelings  to the audience. Antithesis is used at the commencement and conclusion of this monologue to  emphasise the idea of contrast, in terms of inherently good and evil forces. “I have thee not yet I  see thee still” and “ words to the heat of deeds too cold a breath gives”, speaks to the audience’s  ...

Words: 938 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Stuff

...Fate vs. Destiny One of the biggest factors in the book “Holes” was the role of fate and destiny. It seemed as if fate and destiny where the only forces that really determined anybodies future in this story. What I wanted to understand better was what was the difference between the two and why they are so powerful in determining the future of others instead of them creating their own paths. Fate is considered to be a set of predetermined events which have an impact on the life of an individual. Apparently everyone has a fate that they must own at some point in their lives. Fate is also considered the reason that everyone is born. So no matter what you want to do in life there is something that you where born for and eventually you must serve your purpose. Fate is something that we can’t escape and will eventually take place in our lives. Sometimes willingly and other times forcefully. Fate, the ultimate purpose in life, it is designed to provide balance to the universe, or designed to create certain situations as benefits a grander design. (Keith Ward; http://goarticles.com/article/The-Reasoning-Behind-Fate/904667/) Destiny on the other hand is seen as events that are inevitable and unchangeable. Once you start down that path there is no going back. Although destiny does seem to have a few loop holes. For instance with destiny you have free will. You get to choose whether or not you take that path of life or not. It may be destined for someone to be a teacher, but if...

Words: 489 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Philosophy

...an attitude of recklessness and disrespect throughout the play. When he makes his proclamation and no one confesses to the murder of Laius, Oedipus loses patience immediately and rushes into his curse. Later, he displays a short temper to Tiresias: "You, you scum of the earth . . . out with it, once and for all!," (ll. 381, 383) and "Enough! Such filth from him? Insufferable--what, still alive? Get out--faster, back where you came from--vanish!" (ll. 490-492) If an unwillingness to listen may be considered stubbornness, certainly Oedipus would take advice from no one who would tell him to drop the matter of his identity, among them Tiresias, the shepherd, and even Jocasta. Even after Oedipus thinks he has received a reprieve from the fate he fears when he hears that Polybus is dead, he does not have the sense to keep still. "So! Jocasta, why, why look to the Prophet’s hearth . . . all those prophesies I feared . . . they’re nothing, worthless," he says. (ll.1053-1054, 1062, 1064) To the shepherd,...

Words: 4487 - Pages: 18

Premium Essay

Nature vs. Nurture

...Running head: NATURE VS. NURTURE/CULTURE The Ongoing Debate of Nature vs. Nurture/Culture Psychology 3520 Social Psychology Abstract In compiling information from our class text and a variety of journals in the Capella library, I have come up with some interest notions on the age old controversy of nature vs. nurture. Biologists declare nature as an innate trait given to all human being (e.g., reflexes and primary needs). Which makes us consider, is this all there is to human development? Is there something else at work? Are there other factors that play a key role in our development? At this turn we must consider nurture/culture. We as human beings are born into societies with all sorts of set norms, social structures and attitudes that manipulate the way in which we develop. The question we will be looking at is which one of these, nature or nurture has the most significant role in our overall development. Or is there yet still something else to add to the pot. Some say there are dimensions that intersect and work in conjunction with one another to form who we are as humans being. Viktor Frankl (1967) noted that the person lives in three interpenetrating dimensions: soma (the physical body), psyche (the emotions and intellect), and the noëtic (the soul). The noëtic dimension includes free will, responsibility, choice, spirituality, and the unique meaning capacity of Homo sapiens. Is it time to reinvent the wheel: Nature, Nurture and Noetic? Introduction The...

Words: 1537 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Julius Caesar Fate V Free Wil

...Fate vs. Free Will in Julius Caesar The play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare is a timeless piece that highlights themes of one’s integrity and destiny. Scenes three and five in the final act are very significant because they truly reveal the fate and virtue of Cassius and Brutus. Both characters committed suicide in these scenes, but the way they each did it exposed their morals. Without the use of dramatic effect, the play would not have been as effective in developing its major concepts. Julius Caesar consistently provoked the question of whether fate or free will controls our lives. Ultimately the plot determined that fate and free will do not work individually, but in conjunction. In Act 5 Scene 3 after Cassius sends Titinius off to discover whose tents have been set on fire and Pindarus to watch uphill he declares,” This day I breathed first. Time is come round, / And where I did begin, there shall I end. / My life is run his compass.” (5.3.24-26). Cassius expresses that he will die on his birthday because his life has made a complete circle. Here the reader may infer that Cassius is just listening to his inner wisdom that he will die today. However, Cassius took it upon himself to ask Pindarus to stab him with his sword after being misinformed that Titinius has been captured by their opposing force. His actions are a complete contradiction because initially Cassius believed he was going to die because of his fate, but then committed suicide...

Words: 1342 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Hu4640

...HU 4640 Week 5 Analysis Freedom vs. Predestination Maynard Azurin July 21, 2014 ITT Online What is predestination? Predestination is believed to be a doctrine which God determines if a person will go to Heaven or Hell. This gives everyone in society an opinion towards their beliefs to teaching what choices we have in accepting Christ. Predestination is also the belief that everything that will happen have already been decided by God or fate and cannot be changed (Webster (2014). Predestination. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/predestination.) What is freedom? Many of us in today’s society see freedom or free-will as to being liberal. Freedom is not just being free as it is more of being free to what you have to express in what you believe and do. Many call freedom as “free as a bird” but to an extent in certain ways. Freedom can be simplicity, such as relaxing to live as well as others. Freedom also gives us the ability to make decisions without other influences from other people or governments. In today’s religious views, freedom teaches us the facts of God’s plan for salvation that every individual person has a choice to make, to either accept or reject God’s gift of salvation (Bennet (2009) http://www.freewill-predestination.com). Christians today see life towards destiny. We live and die after we live our lives. Fate is usually a predetermined course of events beyond our control. Whatever happens, happens, and there is nothing we...

Words: 569 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Naturalism in Jack London's the Call of the Wild

...Naturalism in The Call of the Wild Jack London was born on January 12, 1876 to a working class family. He had to deal with a hard life from a very young age, but his constant struggling got him through most of the difficulties and by the age of 30, he was internationally famous for his books Call of the Wild (1903), The Sea Wolf (1904) and other successful literay works. Though he wrote passionately about the great questions of life and death and the struggle to survive with dignity and integrity, he also sought peace and quiet inspiration. He wished society to be reformed that he expressed through his writings. His stories of high adventure were based on his own experiences at sea, in the Yukon Territory, and in the fields and factories of California. Similar to a number of writers at that time, he died young, at the age of 40, impoverished (again), sick and suffering from alcoholism. To this day it is still unclear if he the cause of death was accidental morphine overdose or he commited suicide. He as well was a fairly controversial person, so that different authors look at him in various ways: ”The basic law of his thinking was logic. His literary style was the clear, obvious and unmistakable sentences of the beautiful English language. ’The Call of the Wild’ serves as the reference book of English stylistics on Sorbonne. He was the man of facts: not to be afraid of looking inside of the eyes of reality, a great view of life. But Jack London's inner debates did...

Words: 2444 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

The Parable of the Sadhu

...The Parable of the Sadhu Case Recount 1 New Zealander came staggering with a body Dumped the almost naked, barefooted Sadhu at McCoy’s feet and left McCoy took his pulse; Stephen and 4 Swiss gave outer clothings Japanese refused to transport the Sadhu down to the hut with their horse Stephen attempted to help the Sadhu but was suffering from altitude sickness McCoy took off, leaving the Sadhu with Stephen Sherpas carried Sadhu down to a rock at 15,000 feet; Japanese gave the Sadhu food and drink Sadhu was last seen throwing rocks at dogs Fate of Sadhu unknown What happened high on the Himalayan pass? Describe all the people who were there. Why is the incident so important and memorable for McCoy? Sadhu • Hindu monk • Renounce material attachments, food, clothing and shelter • Leaves behind all material attachments • Lives in caves, forests and temples • Never ending pilgrimage • Rugged life (eg. early morning bath in cold mountain) • Wears little or no clothing Source: http://www.ehow.com/how_4425905_become-hindu-sadhu.html Why is the incident so important and memorable for McCoy? • Doesn’t know the final outcome • Lessons about the corporate world was learnt What do you think is the “basic ethical dilemma” referred to by McCoy? Basic Ethical Dilemma Should McCoy have done more? What factors may have influenced the various hikers’ decisionmaking? The perception among some that “the Sadhu has himself to blame for the...

Words: 1376 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Determinism

...Determinism vs Free Will “Determinism is the thesis that everything that occurs happens of necessity.” (Palmer, pg 220). The question of free will is one which has been hotly debated for millennia. Some people believe that humans have the capacity for free will - the ability to choose their actions without being forced to follow a certain course by either by the influence of others or by natural laws. For many theists, free will is regarded as a special gift from God. The notion of human free will is also an important premise for a lot of what happens in human society, in particular, when it comes to our legal system. Professor Embree stated in class free will is necessary for the notion of personal responsibility (Embree, 10/14/14). If people do not have free will, then it is difficult to argue that they are personally and morally responsible for their actions - and if that is the case, how can they be punished for their misdeeds? Free will and determinism are two major theories that have been argued throughout time in order to explain the way individuals’ lives are projected and set up throughout their lifetime. Others, however, argue that if the universe itself is deterministic in nature, then human actions must also be deterministic, thus, modern determinism tends to be an outgrowth of modern science. If human actions simply follow the course of natural law, then it is difficult to hold that those actions can be "freely" chosen. Those who advocate determinism run into...

Words: 498 - Pages: 2