Premium Essay

Frethorne and Johnson

In: Historical Events

Submitted By poppinouttheAR
Words 1021
Pages 5
It’s All About Perspective Two men, Richard Frethorne and Anthony Johnson, arrived to the early seventeenth-century English colonies in North America right around the same time. Although the two men were there for different reasons, both of them had similar conditions and setbacks to live with. In “Retracing the Past: Readings in the History of the American People” written by Gary B. Nash and Ronald Schultz, there is a letter from a white indentured servant named Richard Frethorne to his family titled, “Richard Frethorne’s Letter Home (1623)”. In the letter, Frethorne described the new world and his working conditions to his family back in England; and was disappointed in what he had discovered. Another reading, “Anthony Johnson: Patriarch on Pungoteague Creek”, written by T.H. Breen and Stephen Innes, is included in Retracing the Past: History of the American People. The story of Anthony Johnson is about the young black slave who ended up being equal to the white man in society. Richard Frethorne and Anthony Johnson both lived under similar conditions regarding the land and the provisions that were available. However, Anthony Johnson was a stronger man and had a better perspective than Richard Frethorne. Indentured servants were not quite slaves back in the seventeenth-century. Frethorne and his fellow indentured servants migrated to Virginia and settled in the Chesapeake colony. They agreed to work for a particular amount of time in exchange for land or freedom in the new country. However, when they arrived to Virginia and started their lives as the indentured servants they were, they started questioning whether it was all worth it. The labor was harder than they expected, the food was scarce, and their was hardly enough clothing to go around. Sicknesses were floating around and infecting everyone without much, if any, medicine to help those in need. The...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

The New World: Adapting to Difficulty

...When settlers journeyed to the New World, they had many expectations. They envisioned a limitless land full of opportunity and prosperity. Little did they know, that this kind of utopia was not realistic. The New World was far from perfect, and survival would be difficult. The settlers had no knowledge of the land, leaving them very vulnerable. Because of this, the settlers were forced to adapt to the difficulty of the dystopia. Ultimately, the New World was a combination of both utopian and dystopian qualities. There is a major contrast between utopias and dystopias. Each is characterized by opposite qualities, making the two entirely different. While a utopia is considered to be a perfect world that is void of conflict, a dystopia is regarded as an imperfect world that is full of difficulty. Although these definitions appear to be rather definitive, the New World shows a correlation to both. However, it is clear that the New World has more correspondence to a dystopia than to a utopia. The New World presents several utopian qualities. A utopia is characterized by a peaceful, safe environment, abundant with opportunity. Utopias are generally considered to be perfect. Ideally, a utopia would be free of any conflict, poverty or disease. The New World offered the settlers a chance at a new life. They viewed it as a land full of knowledge and undiscovered resources. In Christopher Columbus’ Letter, he affirms that the beautiful land is perfect for planting and sowing, as......

Words: 594 - Pages: 3