Free Essay

Functionalism and the Family

In: Social Issues

Submitted By Amelialeach
Words 637
Pages 3
Took 45 minutes to complete about 659 words

Using the material from the Item and elsewhere, assess the functionalist contribution to our understanding of the family.(24 marks)
Functionalism is a structural theory as it examines social institutions e.g. economy , education etc. It sees these institutions as a way of moulding and shaping the individual. Functionalism is also a consensus theory and tends to encourage sharing norms and values and promotes agreement rather than conflict , value consensus. Functionalists adopt and organic analogy. This is the idea of seeing society as a living system (human body) , e.g. the skin of our body is like our norms and values.
Material from the item says that Murdock (1949) suggests the four main family functions are reproducing the next generation , then going onto to socialise the next generation they have reproduced into the shared culture , value consensus. The third family function Murdock suggests is the economic function , this function involves providing food , shelter and clothes in order for individuals to benefit. The final family function Murdock suggests is the sexual function , this involves adults' sexual needs being satisfied in a way that doesn’t disturb social order. However information from elsewhere has shown that Murdock assumes only the nuclear family can perform these functions. Parsons argued that as modern industrial societies have evolved and changed , the modern nuclear family has lost may of its former functions. Parsons argued that in modern societies , more and more specialised institutions evolve , he called the process structural differentiation.
Parsons portrayed the male member of the relationship as the instrumental leader , suggesting they are best suited to the world of work and being the economic breadwinner. Parsons then portrayed the female member of the relationship as the expressive leader , suggesting they are best suited to the demands of a caring , home-making and child-rearing role and being a dependent wife and mother. Parsons argued that the performance of these roles will depend upon the kind of society and they will develop to meet the needs of the society. Parsons also makes an analogy of the family to a 'warm bath'. This theory suggests that the family relieves the pressures of everyday life and recharges the batteries of individuals , just like a warm bath would.
However , material from the item shown me that functionalists present a far too rosy and uncritical view of the family life. Feminists and Marxists argue that functionalists ignore the families 'dark side' which involves conflict and exploitation.Marxists like Zaretsky say the family acts as a 'comfort zone' for the worker against the hardships of an oppresive , exploitative workplace. Marxist-feminists explain how gender roles in the family 'fit; the requirements of a capitalist society rather than being a 'natural' society like functionalists claim. Also many other agencies are now involved in the family functions and are taking over the role of the family. Agencies like The Welfare Sate and The Government now take a large role in performing the economic function of the family as they provide food , shelter and clothing for families. The welfare and health function has been taken over by the NHS and Social Services and they play a large part in looking after families. School's and the Media have gone on to take over the socialisation and education of children within the family. The final sexual needs and reproduction function has been taken over by prostitution and adoption as these are easy processes to meet this family function.
Overall , Functionalists have a large contribution to our understanding of the family as they provide functions which most families , especially nuclear families still follow to a certain extent. However , Feminists and Marxists have had a large contribution to our contribution and understanding of the family as well as functionalists as they highlight the family 'dark side'.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Functionalism

...Functionalism is the idea that mental states are functional state and you have to treat the mind as a functional concept. The imaginary level between the physical implementation and the behavioral output is concern with the brain. The brain is like a computer and the mind is the software. As long as the physical system is complex. It can recreate and interact with the neurons in the brain you can have a mind. The Idea functionalism contributes towards a better understanding of life because it takes a look at what the mental state is on a person and identifies the functional role. Our desires, beliefs, and sensations do not share a similarity to other creatures with a brain. Freedom, determinism, and responsibility are the idea that for which anyone is responsible or accountable for their significant action. Responsibility is the concept to a functional society. Responsibility is the root to all our traditions of reward and punishments. Freedom, determinism, and responsibility contribute to a better understanding of life because we see that the choices we make in life are free will. The outcome of the decision you make whether good or bad is what you deserve. The responsibility relies solely on you to make the correct decision that could lead you to a happier life or a dysfunctional one. The structure of the personality is the idea that there are three components to make up a personality the id, the ego, and the superego. The first component is id which is totally......

Words: 395 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Functionalism

...Functionalist’s accounts of education Functionalism is based on the view that society is a system of interdependent parts held together by a shared culture or value consensus. Each part of society, such as family, economy or the education system in this case, performs functions that help to maintain society as a whole. For some sociologists/functionalists, such as Durkheim or Parson for example, the real function of education is to act as a means of promoting consensus, by socialising people into the norms that are seen to be important in a particular society. An example is to instruct on authority relationships, on the ‘correct’ behaviour in public spaces and values, for example hard work, honesty and ambition. To other sociologists, education can be seen as a source of conflict or social division, particularly when issues of gender, class and ethnicity are put under the sociological microscope. The founder of functionalist sociology and French sociologist, Emile Durkheim (1903) identified two main functions of education; these are creating social solidarity and teaching specialist skills. Durkheim argues that society needs a sense of solidarity, meaning that its individual members must feel themselves to be part of a single body or community. The education system helps to create social solidarity by transmitting society’s culture, its shared beliefs and values, from one generation to the next. An example of this is that Durkheim argues that the teaching of a country’s......

Words: 1360 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Assess the Contribution of Functionalism to Our Understanding of Families and Households

...the contribution of functionalism to our understanding of families and households. Functionalism is a macro approach to society. It is based on a consensus that society as whole is run by and for the benefit of all its members. Early Functionalists such as Durkheim believed that society is made up of many institutions which work together to function. Regarding families, Functionalists believe that the nuclear family is best for society. Functionalists look at what the functions the family performs and they therefore say that the nuclear family is best for society. For example functionalists believe that traditional domestic roles (for the male to play an instrumental role as the breadwinner and the female to do the dual-burden) are necessary to ensure that children are socialised correctly with both male and female role models. Functionalists believe that the nuclear family is perfect for bringing up a geographically mobile workforce which allows families to move about for work easily, for example Functionalists believe during the industrial revolution nuclear families became more common as it was easier for families to move to an urban area in search of work than if it was for example an extended family. Conflict theories such as Marxism and Feminism challenge the Functionalism and the consensus of society by taking a more critical view. Social historians such as Laslett and Anderson also criticize the functionalist view of a ‘Functional Fit’ in the family. The main......

Words: 3354 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Functionalism

...What is Functionalism? In the social sciences specifically sociology and socio-cultural anthropology, functionalism also functional analysis, is a sociological philosophy that originally attempts to explain social institutions as collective means to fill individual biological needs. Later it came to focus on the ways social institutions fill social needs, especially social solidarity. Functionalism is associated with Emile Durkheim and more recently with Talcott Parsons (Marshall 1994: 190-1). Since functional analysis studies the contributions made by socio-cultural phenomena to the socio-cultural systems of which they are a part. Many functionalists argue that social institutions are functionally integrated to form a stable system and that a change in one institution will precipitate a change in other institutions; expressed by Durkheim and others as an organic analogy. Functionalism, originating as an alternative to historical explanations, was one of the first twentieth century anthropological theories, until it was superseded by structural-functional analysis or structural-functionalism. Structural-functionalism takes the view that society consists of parts (e.g. police, hospitals, schools, and farms), each of which have their own functions and work together to promote social stability. Structural-functionalism was the dominant perspective of cultural anthropologists and rural sociologists between World War II and the Vietnam War. Along with conflict theory and......

Words: 1525 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Functionalism

...http://anthropology.ua.edu/cultures/cultures.php?culture=Functionalism http://www3.niu.edu/acad/psych/Millis/History/2004/functionalism.htm INTRODUCTION     Functionalism was a major paradigm shift in the history of American psychology.  As an outgrowth of Darwin’s evolutionary theory, the functionalist approach focused on the examination of the function and purpose of mind and behavior.  Rather than the structures of the mind, functionalism was interested in mental processes and their relation to behavior. Through his work at Harvard as a professor teaching psychology courses and his writings related to the philosophy of pragmatism and functionalism, William James became known as spokesman of this burgeoning approach to psychology.  His influence was exponentially increased through the inspiration he gave to his students.  G. Stanley Hall, Mary Calkins, and Edward Thorndike are among those who spread functionalist psychology to other universities.  DARWIN AND FUNCTIONALISM     Charles Darwin’s theory of natural selection was tremendously influential on the establishment of functionalism.  After his famous voyage on The HMS Beagle, Darwin labored many years to produce the book responsible for a dramatic paradigm shift:  The Origin of Species.  Darwin’s argued that the environment forces a natural selection upon its inhabitants and favors those inhabitants that have adaptive characteristics.  The members within a species who have adaptive characteristics pass on this......

Words: 1664 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Assess the Contribution of Functionalism to Our Understanding of the Family

...sociologists believe that the family is important; a key institution in society as it performs vital necessities for each member within it and maintains order and stability within the community. According to Murdock and his study of 250 societies, the family provides the reproduction of the future generations and passes down vital norms and beliefs learnt for the future however another Functionalist, Parsons, argues that the family is affected by industrialisation and demands a geographically mobile workforce. Parsons also claims that the family allows the socialisation of children and the stabilisation of adult personalities, therefore passing down these values and beliefs to be able to function within civilization. Therefore, the young members of the family are taught to abide by the rules the family has and not consort to any delinquent behaviour. However, there are many criticisms towards the Functionalist view of the family. Marxists believe that, among families, there is no consensus and that society is based on inequality between the two classes, the bourgeois (ruling class) and the proletariat (working class). The family is a part of the superstructure of capitalist society which operates not in the interests of society and all of its members equally but in the interests of the capitalist system and of the capitalist class within that system, contrasting the view of Functionalists. According to Marxists, Functionalists ignore the negative side of the family and only......

Words: 644 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Functionalism View on the Family

...Functionalism is a theory that views society as a whole. Functionalists believe that society is based on a value consensus – a set of shared norms and values – into which society socialises its members. This enables individuals to cooperate harmoniously to meet society’s needs and achieve shared goals. Functionalists regard society as a system with symbiotic parts, in that each part depends on each other to function efficiently. For such reasons they use an organic analogy to explain society. For example, just as organs such as the heart or lungs perform functions vital to the well being of the body as a whole, so the family meet some of society’s needs, such as the need to socialise children. Murdock argued that these functions are; economic needs such as food and shelter, reproduction (without which society could not continue), primary socialisation of the young into society’s shared norms and values and sex. He believes that those needs can only be achieved within a nuclear family. However, some sociologists would argue that these needs can be met in other ways than within the family. For example, other family types such as an extended family or institutions such as the Kibbutz in Israel can be used for primary socialisation and economic security. Other needs such as reproduction and sex can also be met by sperm donors or prostitution. Marxist and Feminist sociologists have criticised Murdock’s (1994) theory. They contend that functionalism ignores conflict and......

Words: 1063 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Assess the Contribution of Functionalism to Our Understanding of Families and Households. (24)

...functions of the family Assess the contribution of functionalism to our understanding of families and households. (24) Functionalists take a consensus view of the role of family. They see it as a universal institution that performs essential functions for society as a whole and all members of the family. According to Murdock, it provides important sub-system that provides stable satisfaction for the sex drive and therefore avoids social disruption. As well as this, Murdock says the family reproduces the next generation and thus ensuring current society to continue. Parsons sees a functional fit with the nuclear family fitting modern society’s needs for a geographically and socially mobile labour force. However critics argue that he is wrong about the relationship between industrialisation and family structure. Moreover Marxists, Liberal, radical and Marxist feminist all view the functions of the family in different ways, this essay will assess the different perspectives in which all these groups view the functions of the family. Functionalists believe that society is based on a value consensus- as set of shared norms and values; into which society socialises its members. This enables them to cooperate harmoniously to meet society’s needs and achieve shared goals. They regard society as system made up of different parts or sub-systems that depend on each other, such as the family, the education system and the economy. Factionalists also see the family as a particularly...

Words: 1561 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Functionalism

...7. Functionalism: Historical origin, principles and contributions to the field of Psychology Abstract It is believed that the school of functionalism was first established in 1896 by the publication of John Dewey’s article “The Reflex Arc in Psychology. Functionalism can be defined as a broad school, which focuses on the function of the mind and mental processes, as opposed to the structure of the mind. The school also focuses on how behaviour allows individual adjustment to the environment (Hergenhahn, 2009). The purpose of this essay is to highlight the importance of knowing how the school originated and the basic principles such as; stream of consciousness, habit and instincts, the self and emotions, which shape what functionalism is today. Furthermore it is important to recognise the substantial contributions functionalism made to the broader psychology field such as; applied psychology, memory and behaviourism. Moreover it is important to acknowledge that introspection was the main approach many functionalists perceived to be authentic. Although a further recommendation for research could be how society’s fixation on technology influences an individual’s mind and body in regards to adaptation to the environment. Functionalism: Historical origin, principles and contributions to the field of Psychology Functionalism is an approach that has not been defined with clarity (Hergenhahn, 2009). Although......

Words: 1358 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Functionalism

...The Chosen People – Functionalism What if only you and the people you’re standing with in a room were the only ones left, while everyone else outside of that room perished completely? In this situation, that is our current dilemma. So how does the functionalist perspective apply to this scenario? Let us examine. Being the only people left alive is a pretty big think to try and come to terms with. What would be our first thoughts? After getting over the initial shock and heartbreak that we have most likely lost all the ones we love and the friends that were dear to us, we would need a game plan. But where do we even begin? Personally, I would make the statement that we would need someone to be our leader, to be our person in charge to put forth a plan so that we all can survive together. For this scenario, I think the functionalist perspective applies perfectly because according to functionalists, they believe everything serves a purpose, and I think we could all serve a purpose if we join together as a team. A great way to explain functionalism is to think of it being like the human body, there are many parts and pieces of the body that must come together and work as one in order for the body to function properly and continue thriving, I like to think of functionalist perspective as being defined in the same way, many interdependent parts that in the end must share an equilibrium. According to our text, “…every part of society is dependent to some extent on...

Words: 735 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Functionalism

...Functionalist Theory – Essay Plan Introduction * Functionalism is a consensus structuralist theory, which sees the source of crime and deviance located in the structure of society * Social order and cohesion are based on value consensus, and the agencies of social control seek to protect this by controlling the threat posed by crime and deviance * Functionalists do argue that crime and deviance are useful in society because they have a ‘function’ * They reinforce the consensus of values, norms and behaviour of the majority non-deviant population * Durkheim and other functionalist sociologists who came after him argue that all societies need some change to remain healthy and stable * If society reacts positively to deviant behaviour it starts the process for that behaviour to be seen as non-deviant in the future 1P – Study of crime 1E – Emile Durkheim 1E – Felt that an understanding of crime and deviance was essential in order to understand how society functioned. He argued that crime had 4 characteristics: Inevitable, Universal, Relative and Functional. Overall Durkheim saw high levels of crime and deviance as very negative for society causing uncertainty and disruption but despite the potential threats to social order, he saw some deviance as necessary and beneficial as it could perform positive functions in contributing to the well being by; strengthening collective values, enabling social change, acting as a safety valve and acting as a......

Words: 469 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Functionalism

...Functionalist Overview • Functionalism is a macro, structural theory. It focuses on the needs of the social system as a whole and how these needs shape all the main features of society - from the form that social institutions such as the family take, right down to the behaviour patterns of individuals and the roles they perform. • Functionalism is a consensus theory. It sees society as based on a basic consensus or agreement among its members about values, goals and rules. • Functionalism is very much a modernist theory of society and shares the goals of the Enlightenment project. Functionalists believe that we can obtain true knowledge of the functioning of society and that this knowledge can be used to improve society. DURKHEIM AND FUNCTIONALISM Durkheim was the most important forerunner of functionalism. He was concerned by rapid social change from a traditional society with a simple social structure to a complex modern society. • Traditional society was based on mechanical solidarity with little division of labour, where its members were all fairly alike. A strong collective conscience bound them so tightly together that individuals in the modern sense did not really exist. • Modern society has a complex division of labour, which promotes differences between groups and weakens social solidarity. Greater individual freedom must be regulated to prevent extreme egoism from destroying all social bonds. • Rapid change undermines old norms without creating clear new ones,......

Words: 1480 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Functionalism

...the strengths and limitations of the functionalists theory in sociology. In the study of sociology, the functionalist perspective is a view of society that focuses on the way various parts of society have funtions and live in a consensus that maintain the stability and social order of the whole society. Functionalism is seen as a macro scale approach to society; it sees society as a whole rather than just focusing on some parts of it. Because of this, functionalism views society as a body (organic analogy), all institutions works together to make the society. This is particularly useful when observing the society in order to understand the way it functions and how all the institutions work together to sustain society as a whole. This can also be denoted as one of its strengths. Functionalism is also seen as a consensus theory, it sees society as fair and just, and it acknowledges that many societies including the majority of western ones, have democracy and all individuals within a particular society share the same or similar norms and values. This also could therefore be seen as a strength as it acknowledges that democracy does exists in many societies. Functionalism emphasizes a societal equilibrium. If something happens to disrupt the order and the flow of the system, society must adjust to achieve a stable state. According to Durkheim, society should be analyzed and described in terms of functions. Society is a system of interrelated parts where no one part can......

Words: 1176 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Functionalism

...Assess the contribution of Functionalism and New Right theories and research to our understanding of society today. (33 marks) Functionalism, devised by Durkheim and Parsons, is a structural theory focusing on the needs of the whole social system and how these shape society’s main features (e.g. social institutions, humans’ behavioural patterns). It is a consensus theory, seeing society as based on value consensus (agreement) between its inhabitants about their values, goals and rules. The New Right is a conservative, political perspective that shares similarities with Functionalism (e.g. believing some people are more naturally talented than others) but contradicts it in arguing that the state should have less involvement in society (e.g. by cutting welfare). Durkheim saw modern industrial society as based on a complex division of labour which promotes differences between groups, weakening social solidarity. He argued that the resultant freedom to the individual must be regulated by society to prevent extreme egoism from destroying all social bonds. Resultantly, he saw society as external and independent to individuals, being made up of ‘social facts’ that constrain and shape people’s behaviour to meet society’s functional prerequisites (needs). Durkheim further believed that if any one thing (‘social fact’) exists, it has a function which will help meet society’s needs, the key ones of which are goals (met through political institutions, e.g. parliament), adaptation......

Words: 1668 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Using Material from Item a and Elsewhere, Assess the Contribution of Functionalism to Our Understanding of Families and Households

...assess the contribution of functionalism to our understanding of families and households (24 marks) According to functionalist sociologists, the family is a key institution of society. It performs vital functions for the maintenance of society as a whole and for the benefit of all its individual members. For example, according to George Peter Murdock, it provides for the stable satisfaction of the sex drive and thus avoids the social disruption and conflict that could be caused by a sexual ‘free for all’. Similarly, the family reproduces the next generation and thereby ensures the continuation of society over time. Functionalists tend to see the nuclear family as the ideal family type for modern society. For example, Talcott Parsons argues that it is the family structure best equipped to meet the need of industrial society for a mobile labour force. Similarly, the nuclear family performs two essential functions for its members and for society as a whole. However, not everyone accepts the functionalist view of the family and its role. Marxists and feminists reject its consensus assumptions about who benefits from the family. Similarly, historians and sociologists have put forward evidence to challenge Parsons’ view that there is a ‘functional fit’ between the type of society and the type of family structure found within it. When considering the question, we need to understand that functionalism has contributed towards our understanding of the family. However other......

Words: 1055 - Pages: 5