Free Essay

Fundamentals of Ethics

In: Philosophy and Psychology

Submitted By belleaet
Words 3455
Pages 14
Philosophy is the study of general and fundamental problems, such as those connected with reality, existence, knowledge, values,reason, mind, and language
Philosophy is distinguished from other ways of addressing such problems by its critical, generally systematic approach and its reliance on rational argument. In more casual speech, by extension, "philosophy" can refer to "the most basic beliefs, concepts, and attitudes of an individual or group".
The word "philosophy" comes from the Ancient Greek φιλοσοφία (philosophia), which literally means "love of wisdom". The introduction of the terms "philosopher" and "philosophy" has been ascribed to the Greek thinker Pythagoras.
The Main Branches of Philosophy are divided as to the nature of the questions asked in each area. The integrity of these divisions cannot be rigidly maintained, for one area overlaps into the others. A. Axiology: the study of value; the investigation of its nature, criteria, and metaphysical status. More often than not, the term "value theory" is used instead of "axiology" in contemporary discussions even though the term “theory of value” is used with respect to the value or price of goods and services in economics.
Axiology is usually divided into two main parts.
Ethics: the study of values in human behavior or the study of moral problems: e.g., (1) the rightness and wrongness of actions, (2) the kinds of things which are good or desirable, and (3) whether actions are blameworthy or praiseworthy.
Æsthetics: the study of value in the arts or the inquiry into feelings, judgments, or standards of beauty and related concepts. Philosophy of art is concerned with judgments of sense, taste, and emotion. B. Epistemology: the study of knowledge. In particular, epistemology is the study of the nature, scope, and limits of human knowledge.

C. Ontology or Metaphysics: the study of what is really real. Metaphysics deals with the so-called first principles of the natural order and "the ultimate generalizations available to the human intellect." Specifically, ontology seeks to indentify and establish the relationships between the categories, if any, of the types of existent things.

Ethics, sometimes known as moral philosophy, is a branch of philosophy that involves systematizing, defending and recommending concepts of right and wrong conduct.[1] The term comes from the Greek word ἠθικός ethikos from ἦθος ethos, which means "custom, habit". The superfield within philosophy known as axiology includes both ethics and aesthetics and is unified by each sub-branch's concern with value.[2] Philosophical ethics investigates what is the best way for humans to live, and what kinds of actions are right or wrong in particular circumstances. Ethics may be divided into three major areas of study:[1] * Meta-ethics, about the theoretical meaning and reference of moral propositions and how their truth values (if any) may be determined * Normative ethics, about the practical means of determining a moral course of action * Applied ethics draws upon ethical theory in order to ask what a person is obligated to do in some very specific situation, or within some particular domain of action (such as business)
Related fields are moral psychology, descriptive ethics, and value theory. Ethics seeks to resolve questions dealing with human morality—concepts such as good and evil, right and wrong, virtue and vice, justice and crime.
Morality (from the Latin moralitas "manner, character, proper behavior") is the differentiation of intentions, decisions, and actions between those that are good or right and those that are bad or wrong.[citation needed] Morality can be a body of standards or principles derived from acode of conduct from a particular philosophy, religion, or culture, or it can derive from a standard that a person believes should be universal.[1] Morality may also be specifically synonymous with "goodness" or "rightness."
Just war theory (jus bellum iustum) is a doctrine, also referred to as a tradition, of military ethics studied by theologians, ethicists,policy makers, and military leaders. The purpose of the doctrine is to ensure war is morally justifiable through a series of criteria, all of which must be met for a war to be considered just. The criteria are split into two groups: "the right to go to war’' (jus ad bellum)and ‘'right conduct in war’' (jus in bello). The first concerns the morality of going to war and the second with moral conduct within war.[1] Recently there have been calls for the inclusion of a third category of just war theory - jus post bellum - dealing with the morality of post-war settlement and reconstruction.
Just War theory postulates that war, while very terrible, is not always the worst option. There may be responsibilities so important, atrocities which can be prevented or outcomes so undesirable they justify war.[2]
Thomas Aquinas[edit]
Nine hundred years later, Thomas Aquinas — an immensely influential philosopher and theologian in the tradition of scholasticism — used the authority of Augustine's arguments as he laid out the conditions under which a war could be just:[14] * First, just war must be waged by a properly instituted authority such as the state. (Proper Authority is first: represents the common good: which is peace for the sake of man's true end—God.) * Second, war must occur for a good and just purpose rather than for self-gain (for example, "in the nation's interest" is not just) or as an exercise of power. (Just Cause: for the sake of restoring some good that has been denied. i.e., lost territory, lost goods, punishment for an evil perpetrated by a government, army, or even the civilian populace.) * Third, peace must be a central motive even in the midst of violence.[15] (Right Intention: an authority must fight for the just reasons it has expressly claimed for declaring war in the first place. Soldiers must also fight for this intention.)

Preemptive war is a strike to gain the advantage when an enemy strike is believed to be imminent. The classic example in recent history is the 1967 Arab-Israeli War. Israel was aware that Egypt and Syria where about to invade. Instead of waiting, Israel struck first and successfully destroyed Egyptian air power before they were able to get their planes in the air. This preemptive strike was justified by Israel because war with the Arabs was virtually an inevitability, and they wished to gain the upper hand.
The problem
A pre-emptive strike can conflict with the doctrine of the just war in two ways: * it is carried out before the other side attacks with military force, and so appears to make the side carrying out the strike the aggressor * it is usually carried out before a formal declaration of war

Preventive war is something else altogether. It is war designed to prevent imagined future war. It is based on a set of suppositions, hypotheses which could prove true or false. At its heart is the idea — our enemies our strong now, but they will be even stronger in the future. Better to attack them sooner rather than later. Better to defeat them before they get any stronger.
Terrorism is not new and even though it has been used since the early times of recorded history, it can be relatively hard to define terrorism.

Terrorism has been described variously as both a tactic and strategy; a crime and a holy duty; a justified reaction to oppression and an inexcusable abomination. Obviously, a lot depends on whose point of view is being represented. Terrorism has often been an effective tactic for the weaker side in a conflict. As an asymmetric form of conflict, it confers coercive power with many of the advantages of military force at a fraction of the cost. Due to the secretive nature and small size of terrorist organizations, they often offer opponents no clear organization to defend against or to deter. Terrorism is commonly defined as violent acts (or the threat of violent acts) intended to create fear (terror), perpetrated for a religious, political, or ideological goal, and which deliberately target or disregard the safety of non-combatants (e.g., neutralmilitary personnel or civilians). Another common definition sees terrorism as political, ideological or religious violence by non-state actors. Some definitions now include acts of unlawful violence and war. The use of similar tactics by criminal organizations for protection rackets or to enforce a code of silence is usually not labeled terrorism, though these same actions may be labeled terrorism when done by a politically motivated group. Usage of the term has also been criticized for its frequent undue equating with Islamism or jihadism, while ignoring non-Islamic organizations or individuals.[1][2] In theinternational community, terrorism has no legally binding, criminal-law definition.[3][4]

WHAT JIHAD IS * The Arabic word "jihad" is often translated as "holy war," but in a purely linguistic sense, the word " jihad" means struggling or striving. * The arabic word for war is: "al-harb". * In a religious sense, as described by the Quran and teachings of the Prophet Muhammad (s), "jihad" has many meanings. It can refer to internal as well as external efforts to be a good Muslims or believer, as well as working to inform people about the faith of Islam. * If military jihad is required to protect the faith against others, it can be performed using anything from legal, diplomatic and economic to political means. If there is no peaceful alternative, Islam also allows the use of force, but there are strict rules of engagement. Innocents - such as women, children, or invalids - must never be harmed, and any peaceful overtures from the enemy must be accepted. * Military action is therefore only one means of jihad, and is very rare. To highlight this point, the Prophet Mohammed told his followers returning from a military campaign: "This day we have returned from the minor jihad to the major jihad," which he said meant returning from armed battle to the peaceful battle for self-control and betterment. * In case military action appears necessary, not everyone can declare jihad. The religious military campaign has to be declared by a proper authority, advised by scholars, who say the religion and people are under threat and violence is imperative to defend them. The concept of "just war" is very important. * The concept of jihad has been hijacked by many political and religious groups over the ages in a bid to justify various forms of violence. In most cases, Islamic splinter groups invoked jihad to fight against the established Islamic order. Scholars say this misuse of jihad contradicts Islam. * Examples of sanctioned military jihad include the Muslims' defensive battles against the Crusaders in medieval times, and before that some responses by Muslims against Byzantine and Persian attacks during the period of the early Islamic conquests.
WHAT JIHAD IS NOT * Jihad is not a violent concept. * Jihad is not a declaration of war against other religions. It is worth noting that the Koran specifically refers to Jews and Christians as "people of the book" who should be protected and respected. All three faiths worship the same God. Allah is just the Arabic word for God, and is used by Christian Arabs as well as Muslims. * Military action in the name of Islam has not been common in the history of Islam. Scholars says most calls for violent jihad are not sanctioned by Islam. * Warfare in the name of God is not unique to Islam. Other faiths throughout the world have waged wars with religious justifications
The term hirabah refers to public terrorism in a war against society and civilization. In legal terminology it is defined as “spreading mischief in the land,” but its precise meaning, as defined by Professor Khalid Abou el Fadl, is “killing by stealth and targeting a defenseless victim in a way intended to cause terror in society.” This is the Islamic definition of terrorism. It is the very opposite of jihad. 1. Moral relativism is the view that moral judgments are true or false only relative to some particular standpoint (for instance, that of a culture or a historical period) and that no standpoint is uniquely privileged over all others.
Violence, Terrorism and Justice by Christopher Morris and R.G. Frey I. What is Terrorism? A. The use of violence, usually to achieve social or political goals, with the following frequently conjoined characteristics: (1) violence is designed to create terror, fear, or panic in a population. (2) the use of violence is usually random or arbitrary. (3) non-combatants or “innocents” are often the target. (a) this feature is more controversial given that terrorists often claim that their victims are not innocent. This gives rise to an interesting question, namely, what does it mean for people to be innocent or not responsible for the actions of, for example, their government? II. Can Terrorism Ever Be Justified? A. Act Utilitarianism: in principle could condone the use of terrorism on occasion, if the act of terrorism maximized the well-being of all those affected by an act of terrorism over some peaceful alternative. So, groups broader than those sponsoring and benefitting from the terrorism would have to be considered. (1) Necessary questions to ask (a) Is the terrorist’s means the most effective and efficient way to achieve the desired goal? Here we would have to compare terrorism with other peaceful means to achieve sociopolitical ends, such as non-violent civil disobedience and passive resistance, boycotts etc. These alternative means seem more likely to be efficient and effective, given that they do not tend to harden the resistance of the targeted group as much as terrorism, and given that they often bolster sympathy from outsiders and make it more difficult for aggressors to continue their aggression. (b) Is the goal desirable enough to justify the terrorists horrible methods? For example, is the reunification of Ireland worth the suffering and loss inflicted by the IRA? The key for consequentialists, is that the party we have to consider is not just the IRA but those who are affected by their acts of terror. (2) Rectifying Injustice: given the difficulty of justifying acts of terrorism by appeal to achieving socio-political goals, such as the reclamation of territory or the elimination of unwanted cultural influence, terrorists often try to justify terrorism by claiming that their acts are concerned with rectifying or eliminating injustice. This is problematic for two reasons: (a) One problem, of course, is that there is usually something to be said to support both sides of the conflict, hence the parties do not fall so neatly into the “just” and “unjust” categories. This makes the endeavor to rectify injustice through terrorism different from using legal punishment to rectify the injustice of a murder. (b) Moreover, can we rectify one injustice without perpetrating another? (3) Conclusion: Although it is theoretically possible to justify terrorism using consequentialist reasoning, doing so in practice seems to be quite difficult. B. Non-Consequentialist Theories (1) The Intentional Killing of Innocents: the Kantian tradition will impose an indefeasible prohibition against the intentional killing of the innocent. Calling this prohibition “indefeasible” means that an innocent person can never be intentionally killed, regardless of how favorable the consequences may be. (Think, for example, of Kant’s second categorical imperative: if one were to blow up a cafe as a means to obtain some political goal and to strike fear in a population, innocent human lives would be used merely as a means to achieve such ends). Such an indefeasible prohibition against the intentional killing of innocents would oftentimes condemn terrorist acts. (a) constraints on responses to terrorism: the Kantian tradition would place constraints on how we may respond to terrorists. For example, we could not indiscriminately carpet bomb a city to deter terrorists from striking again, since we too would be targeting innocents to achieve a similar end, namely striking fear in the heart of people--in our case, the terrorists. i. natural rights: some non-consequentialist thinkers appeal to the notion of natural rights, or entitlements we have for no other reason than that we are human. Since we retain our humanity until death, these rights are inalienable and cannot be forfeited regardless of one’s actions. So, while such theorists would condemn terrorism, terrorists themselves would also retain their moral standing, in which case we would be limited in our capacity to respond to them. III. Who is Innocent? A. Two Approaches: Most non-consequentialist moral theories prohibit the intentional targeting of the innocent, which is why they often condemn acts of terrorism. However, terrorists often claim that their victims are not really innocent. (1) Moral or Juridical Sense of Innocence: someone is not innocent in this sense if he has committed some moral or legal transgression. Terrorists who are concerned with targeting those who they believed were not innocent in this sense might target certain political figures or nationalities who they think violated some moral or legal standard. (2) Causal Innocence: someone can lack innocence in this sense so long as he poses a treat, even if he does not have culpability. A terrorist concerned to target those who are not innocent in this sense might target who financially or electorally support a repressive regime. The September 11th terrorists might have believed that inhabitants of the World Trade Center lacked this type of innocence. B. Analogies Between Terrorism and other Indiscriminate Killing: there is a clear similarity between terrorism and other indiscriminate acts of killing, such as the bombing of Dresden and Tokyo, and Hiroshima and Nagasaki. These bombings were designed to create terror in a population and intentionally targeted innocents as a means to do so. Moreover, like terrorism, the use of force was random or arbitrary, since people and buildings with little or no political or social significance were targeted. This analogy is significant, I think, because people of our country tend to think that our preferred type of violent behavior is usually markedly different from that of so-called “terrorists”. Moreover, in the case of Dresden and Tokyo, our indiscriminate killing was as ineffective in achieving its goals as more paradigmatically terrorist acts are. Moreover, if Dresden and Tokyo are actions of which one approves, it is difficult to broadly claim that all acts of terrorism are impermissible. IV. What are the Ideological Roots of Terrorism? Robert L. Philips contends that the intellectual sources of terrorism spring from three Western ideas, popular sovereignty, self-determination, and consequentialism. How so? A. Popular Sovereignty: this is the view that human beings are born free and equal and have a right to an equal share of political power. They exercise this power either by becoming politicians themselves or, more commonly, by voting. Hence, the doctrine of popular sovereignty identifies the state with “the people”. So how is this idea behind terrorism? Well, if the people are identified with the state, then they are responsible for the actions of the state of which they are a part. And if that state commits an injustice in the eyes of a particular group, then that particular group can hold the ordinary citizens of that state responsible. Or so they believe. B. Self-Determination: this is the view that “a people” has the right to determine its own destiny and the disposition of the land on which it lives without intervention from a third party. This idea lends support to terrorism since terrorists often give it as the principle justification for their actions (think of the IRA and Palestinian terrorists). The idea itself is dangerously vague and is often exploited by both sides. For instance, Protestants in N. Ireland claim that they have a right as “a people” to determine their own destiny, which is to remain part of the UK, while Catholic nationalists identify “the people” with the island of Ireland as a whole. C. Ethical Consequentialism: in general, this can make permissible acts leading to great harm for the ultimate purpose of achieving some good. Hence, non-combatants may be killed for the sake of obtaining some social or political objective. This way of thinking stands in marked contrast with categorical moral principles which prohibit the intentional killing of innocents regardless of the consequences. D. Putting the pieces together: a terrorist organization believes are entitled to determine its own destiny and the disposition of the land on which they live (self-determination). If a third party interferes with that right, then the citizens of that third party should be held responsible (popular sovereignty). Finally, those non-combatants may be killed for the sake of achieving the ultimate goal of self-determination. E. The Solution: Philips suggests that we should jettison ethical consequentialism as a solution to the problem of terrorism. The principles of popular sovereignty and selfdetermination seem like notions that are worth preserving over the doctrine of ethical consequentialism.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Fundamental Ethics

...Chapter 1 The Imperatives of Ethics Ethics presupposes some imperatives or sine qua non, those without which Ethics would not be possible. These imperatives are: 1) the existence of God or a Supreme Being; 2) the existence of human freedom; 3) the existence of an afterlife, i.e. life beyond the grave, or the immortality of the soul. 1. The existence of God or a Supreme Being Without the existence of God or a Supreme Being, Ethics would make no sense. There is no reason for man to deny himself evil but pleasurable acts if there were no final judge to dispense justice. When one speaks off morality or the goodness or badness of human acts, one idea, is presupposed: retribution. Retribution means that good acts deserve reward; bad acts deserve punishment. Reward and punishment are presupposed by morality. Who metes out reward or punishment? It must be a Lawgiver or an Arbiter of Morality, One who dispenses retributive justice. Without this being, the whole structure of Ethics will collapse. At this early point, it must be explained that cultures other than the Christian speak of retribution in a different way. In some cases, the Supreme Being is not a personal God in Whom Christians believe, but rather a law or a process. These cultures had been in existence long before the biblical and Christian eras. The people of these ancient cultures arrived at these concepts by way of human reasoning without the aid of divine revelation. The Indians do not accept......

Words: 9309 - Pages: 38

Premium Essay

Lwc1 Cos

...LWC1 - Fundamentals of Business Law and Ethics Course of Study Your competence will be assessed as you complete the LWC1 objective assessment for this course of study. This course of study may take up to 10 weeks to complete. Introduction Overview There are the two major subdomains of study within the Fundamentals of Business Law and Ethics Course of Study: business law and business ethics. The exam covers 11 business law and ethics concepts, including the following: contractual relationship government regulation of business dispute resolution labor and employment law hiring and employment practices warranties, negligence, and liabilities Sarbanes-Oxley Act ethical issues in business ethical leadership ethics programs use of company resources You likely have had some experience with the legal system, either through your own encounters or merely through listening to the nightly news, and you have probably read or heard about various ethical and legal issues causing financial upheaval in today's business world. This background will serve you well in this study. Now you can expand on that experience, and perhaps refine and enhance your own views on these issues. Once you complete this course of study, you will have demonstrated a level of competence that you can immediately use in your work setting and career. Outcomes and Evaluation There are 10 competencies covered by this course of study; they are listed in the "Competencies for Fundamentals of Business Law and Ethics......

Words: 8481 - Pages: 34

Premium Essay

Professional Ethics

...Journal of Accounting, Ethics & Public Policy   Volume 3, Number 1 (Winter 2003), pp. 1‐26 Ayn Rand and Contemporary Business Ethics    Stephen R. C. Hicks Introduction: business and the free society Advocates of the free society think of business as an integral part of the dynamic, progressive society they advocate. In the West, the rise of a culture hospitable to business has unleashed incalculable productive energies. Business professionals have taken the products of science and revolutionized the fields of agriculture, transportation, and medicine. Business professionals have taken the products of art and dramatically increased our access to them. We have more food, we are more mobile, we have more health care, we have more access to works of fiction, theater, and music than anyone could reasonably have predicted a few centuries ago. The result of business in the West, and more recently in parts of the East, has been an enormous rise in the standard of human living. We have gone, in the space of a few centuries, from a time in which perhaps 10% of the population lived comfortably while 90% lived near subsistence to a time in which 90% live better than comfortably and 10% live near subsistence. And we haven’t given up on the remaining 10%.   Intellectuals who study the free society have, in the fields of economics and politics, a good understanding of what makes this possible: individualism. In economics there exists a well worked out understanding......

Words: 10396 - Pages: 42

Premium Essay


...Ethics Tracy Booker Ethics and Moral Reasoning Instructor: Galen Johnson August 12, 2013 l If the majority of our society conducted themselves in a way they saw fit and did not abide by rules we would be living in complete chaos. My topic for this assignment is ethics. Ethics is a part of everyday life. I will demonstrate in my assignment the most convincing ethical system. I will attempt to explain why it is necessary to have universal principles. I will give the fundamental principles of ethics. I will explain what is considered the good life and how to achieve it. I will elaborate on what it ethically bad life. I will attempt to discuss if ethics is natural or learned. I will discuss the role of ethical actions. I will discuss how humans differentiate on between what is good and bad. My final point will be to explain if humans are free or determined and how this perspective relates to human responsibility. The systematic study of rules for behavior and conduct, for ourselves and for others is called ethics. Ethics are a requirement for a normal life. It is a study of right or wrong in human actions. Ethics helps us understand who we are. Without out ethics a human life would be full of destructive patterns. A good foundation of ethics requires a standard. This standard has to have proper goals and actions to be considered ethically correct. The most convincing ethical system is utilitarianism. This ethical system dates back to the seventeenth century......

Words: 1689 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Dreamliner Case

...MBSA1533-BUSINESS ETHICS, RESPONSIBILITY AND SUSTAINABILITY INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT: BEHAVIORAL ETHICS: A CRITIQUE AND A PROPOSAL NUR AZUWA BINTI OTHMAN MBS141051 LECTURER’S NAME: DR ABUL QUASEM 20 MAY 2015 Summary The article depicts the argument whether there is a need in behavioural ethics to change our understanding from the influence of contemporary moral psychology and back to management theorist, in which Goshal expressed his opinion that moral is fundamental. Philosophical work of Emmanuel Levinas is then constructed to test on the metaphysical concern. Levinas viewed that essential moral character of human life and the reality of human agency as ontologically fundamental or to put simply, ethical is the “first cause” in regard to understand the nature and action of the individual. Problem Statement 1) The search for a definition of moral personhood which explains the moral-judgement-moral action gap For the past 10 years, researchers have worked to express definition of moral personhood and at the same time address the moral-judgment and moral-action gap. This gap represent the imbalance between an individual’s moral judgment and the action that follows this judgment. 2) The search for the nature and role of the primitive evaluative processes in moral judgement and action Hoffman (1970) and Eisenberg (1986) has come up with their theories that role emotion play important role in moral behaviour. However different views have arose to explain which......

Words: 1506 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay


...2 What is Nursing? In this paper I will identify the fundamental concepts of nursing. In addition, I will recognize how nursing is based on the principles of Primary Health Care (PHC). Further, how the history of nursing has formed nursing today and what it means to be a professional in nursing by incorporating the code of ethics. Fundamentals of Nursing Nursing is a profession that centers on the caring for individuals, as a client, as a family, as a group and as a community so they can achieve, maintain or recover optimal health and quality of life (Burger & Goddard, 2010). I believe that the nursing role is to educate clients by the protection and promotion of general health which is congruent to The American Nurses Association (2007) which defines nursing as; the protection, promotion and optimization of health, prevention of illness, lessening of suffering through diagnoses and treatment and advocating client care for individuals, families, groups and communities (American Nurses Association, 2007). The nursing profession utilizes a system that increases client knowledge about factors that can contribute to overall health and the resources that can increase wellbeing; this is called the Nursing Process. This process is a technique used to assess and diagnose needs, plan and implement interventions, and evaluate the outcomes of care provided (Adams, 2007). I believe that the fundamental concepts of nursing are to preserve, conserve or revive the...

Words: 1902 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay


...Philosophy is the study of general and fundamental problems, such as those connected with reality, existence, knowledge, values,reason, mind, and language.[1][2] Philosophy is distinguished from other ways of addressing such problems by its critical, generally systematic approach and its reliance on rational argument.[3] In more casual speech, by extension, "philosophy" can refer to "the most basic beliefs, concepts, and attitudes of an individual or group".[4] The word "philosophy" comes from the Ancient Greek φιλοσοφία (philosophia), which literally means "love of wisdom".[5][6][7] The introduction of the terms "philosopher" and "philosophy" has been ascribed to the Greek thinker Pythagoras.[ Epistemology is concerned with the nature and scope of knowledge,[11] such as the relationships between truth, belief, and theories of justification. Logic is the study of the principles of correct reasoning. Arguments use either deductive reasoning or inductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning is when, given certain statements (called premises), other statements (called conclusions) are unavoidably implied. Ethics Ethics is one of the major branches of philosophy and an ethical theory is part and parcel of all philosophies broadly conceived. The aim of ethics has been viewed in different ways: according to some, it is the discernment of right from wrong actions; to others, ethics separates that which is morally good from what is morally bad;... Metaphysics is one of the core......

Words: 334 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

International Accounting Ethics

...Abstract Advanced Audit & Assurance often creates the question on practice of ethics in professional activities. The purpose of this report is to review Threats to Compliance with the Code of Conduct by Professional Accountants. With the expanding business in the modern world, issues arise on professionalism of Independent and Internal Auditors. Is it whether the Professional Accountants follows the ethical code provided by the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants in order to provide true and effective financial reports to the internal and external users? Professionals are expected to conduct themselves at a higher level than most others members in the organization. The International Accounting Bodies has emphasized the conceptual...

Words: 3543 - Pages: 15

Free Essay

Examine Four of Fletchers Six Principles

...Situation ethics is an ethical theory devised by philosopher Joseph Fletcher. In situation ethics moral principles can be overlooked if love is better served. It is teological, which is consequential but rather than the greatest good it is looking for the greatest love. Joseph Fletcher outlined his theory of situation ethics in ten principles which he separated into the four working presumptions and the six fundamental principles otherwise known as propositions. In this essay I will be examining four of Joseph Fletchers six fundamental principles. The first fundamental principle is ‘only one thing is intrinsically good; namely love: nothing else at all’. Only love is good in itself. Actions are not intrinsically good or evil as they are good or evil depending upon whether they promote the most loving result. Love is intrinsically valuable it has inherit worth. Nothing else has intrinsic value but it gains or acquires its value because it happens to help people making it good or hurt people making it bad. Actions are not intrinsically good or evil depending upon whether they produce the most loving result. They are extrinsically good depending on their circumstances and consequences. Joseph Fletcher said that actions are extrinsically good depending upon the circumstances. According to Joseph Fletchers first principle actions such as lying can be justified if the action itself is extrinsically good. Natural law states that actions such as lying are always wrong regardless...

Words: 682 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Short Paper – Healthcare Reform

...Seminar 3 Short Paper – Healthcare Reform Philosophy of Ethics Healthcare Reform According to Teitbaum & Wilensky (2007), policies developed in different industries form an integral part of how individuals perform various activities aimed at assisting the society. Signing of Patient Protection and Affordable Act by the United States by President Barrack Obama led to a lot of changes in the health sector. The introduction of healthcare reform in the health sector act brought about many reforms that ensues affordable healthcare services to all regardless of financial status. The healthcare reform ensures every American citizen has a private or government insurance to take care of their hospital bills. In addition, more than 60% of citizens have their insurance covered by employers while Medicaid covers most low income earners, disabled people and people over the age of 65. Healthcare reform has introduced both virtue ethics and care ethics in the health sector through human resource capacity building and development and knowledge sharing as well as information management systems. The ethical issues that relate to health care requirements should ensure that clinicians and physicians have adequate training on how to handle ethical values in health problems. The health care practitioners are obligated to understand the ethical frameworks as well as moral theories related to influencing health care practices positively. Healthcare reform must follow a clear moral......

Words: 821 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Personal Responsibility

...Personal Responsibility Frank Franklin GEN/200 October 14, 2013 Bonnie Ferguson   Personal responsibility is necessary to function in your work or school environments. Giving in to peer pressure, the moment or the lighter hearted fun can ruin your long run success. Remaining focused, goal oriented and committed to the final result, remaining responsible and properly directed will get the job done. While Some can direct themselves without effort or thought, personal responsibility is fundamental for success in all school and work endeavors. Your work ethic is the backbone of your success, if you do not keep a positive work ethic, your efforts will fail. Personal responsibility is fundamental for success in all endeavors. It is a way of thinking and responding. A way of life for some. A recipe for success for others. No matter your preference, it is the foundation of work ethics. It is understand what you want and being willing to do whatever is necessary to get that job done. You have to get the job done, nobody is going to do it for you. It is taking upon yourself a job and completing it. Keeping on track and understanding that you and you alone are ultimately in control of your actions and destiny. (Zavod, PhD. 2011). Reading, Studying and watching lessons. Keeping up with current discussions and course materials. Success or failure is yours to earn. You have made the decision to go to school, next is getting...

Words: 930 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Business Analysis determine the business strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (The situation analysis, 2011) and make beneficial decisions. However, legal and ethical factors are areas where issues comes at any level of the business. In this topic, it’s important to describe and analyze the critical issues around legal and ethical factors and how they impact the business performance and strategic direction. A legal factor relates to new laws or directives governing how businesses behave. This can be in relation to other businesses, customers or the environment. Indeed, businesses need to watch out for new laws put on the market. In fact, businesses’ activities are restrained by laws and regulations (A hands-on introduction to business fundamentals in foundation, 2014). Those laws could be local, national or international and all depend on where the business is operating. Moreover, changes in the laws can have a direct impact on the business if the service or product becomes highly regulated or outlawed. Similarly, government regulations, such as those that affect the environment or communication, are beyond the business control and could have a direct impact on the business. In the same way, ethical factors are the basic concepts and...

Words: 650 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Ethical Dimensions in Health Care Profession

...principles (Fry & Johnstone, 2002). Tesfamicael GhebrehiwetThe nursing profession uses regulatory mechanisms, codes of ethics and other means to ensure ethical behavior. For example, The ICN Code of Ethics for Nurses asserts, “Inherent in nursing is respect for human rights, including the right to life, to dignity and to be treated with respect” (ICN, 2000, p. 2). To locate ethical issues within the context of nursing, it is vital to understand the International Council of Nurses (ICN) definition of nursing itself: “Nursing encompasses autonomous and collaborative care of individuals of all ages, families, groups and communities, sick or well and in all settings. Nursing includes the promotion of health, prevention of illness, and the care of ill, disabled, and dying people. Advocacy, promotion of a safe environment, research, participating in shaping health policy and in patient and health systems management, and education are also key nursing roles” (ICN, 2005). This definition incorporates the three components of bioethics as outlined by Fry and Johnstone (2002), including norms of nursing practice, expansion of knowledge, and advocacy or policy development. It follows that nurses must develop a thorough knowledge of ethical issues, policies and procedures related to the protection of people as part of their responsibility as professional nurses. Ethics and nursing responsibilities As medical and scientific technology advance, individuals and society face......

Words: 1484 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay


...Abstract This paper is on the based on ethical issues in financial accounting, I picked this subject because I believe that having good morals and ethics is the mainstay of life in general, But in finance and accounting it is very important to have this to be successful in business, which is based on personal, professional and corporate issues that will arise in day to day operation. Introduction Accounting is the profession of Analyzing, collection, recording and posting financial transactions in a manner to provide useful information essential to making financial decisions by leaders in a business or organization. Accounting is also called the language of business. The financial statements are used to communicate the effects of the operation and financial strength of a business or organization. By making comparisons of statements from a company from year to year, a professional could be able to predict the profitability, direction and financial condition of a business or organization (Juan, 2007). It is important that the accounting practice is immune to greed and selfishness, and should be a free emotional reporting function which requires a skillset to handle complex technical skills but have no moral involvement. People think on most financial issues or scandals are problems of disloyalty and distrust (Senaratne, 2011). Can we trust those who run the finances in today’s world? Can Accountants, auditors, bankers can be trusted? Yet when an issue is......

Words: 1067 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Ways of Knowing

...Ways of Knowing D. Boone Ways of Knowing What are the four patterns of knowing fundamental to the professional nurse? Unlike many other professions, the nursing profession has many distinct and unique components. Nurses’ knowledge is acquired from many different sources and life experiences. Although hands on clinical skills are necessary, these skills are not usable alone. The ways of knowing is much more than the educational components of a college degree and licensure. Barbara Carper established four patterns of knowing which are needed in order to learn and apply nursing knowledge. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the four patterns of knowing, describe its relation to professional nursing and reflect upon these patterns in personal practice. Barbara Carper was a nurse pioneer who developed the four fundamental patterns of knowing in nursing. According to Carper (1978), “Understanding these patterns is essential for the teaching and learning of nursing” (P. 13). Carper identified four fundamental patterns of knowing which she classified as empirical, esthetic, personal and ethical. Carper (1978) states “The four patterns are distinguished according to logical type of meaning and designed as: (1) empirics, the science of nursing; (2) esthetics, the art of nursing; (3) the components of personal knowledge in nursing; and (4) ethics, the component of moral knowledge in nursing” (P. 14). Nursing knowledge goes beyond factual information. According......

Words: 1271 - Pages: 6