Premium Essay

Gainesboro Machine Tools Corporation Executive Summary

In:

Submitted By alishan01
Words 1382
Pages 6
Statement of the Problem Established in 1923, Gainesboro Machine Tools Corporation (Gainesboro) started out manufacturing machinery parts but by the 1980s started to pioneer in the industry of computer aided design (CAD) and computer aided manufacturing (CAM). Competition ramped up in the 1990s and Gainesboro’s revenues per share declined by 16% from 1998-2004 (Exhibit 5). The company restructured itself and focused more resources on innovation. By late 2004 the company started to turn around its attrition with a positive growth outlook. In August 2005, Ashley Swenson, the Chief Financial Officer of Gainesboro, was considering 3 dividend policies to implement; a zero-dividend payout, a 40% dividend payout or $0.20 a share, or a residual dividend payout.
Discussion
Dividend Policy Choices
1. Zero-dividend payout: This option of not paying a dividend allows Gainesboro to invest their earnings into the expansion of their advanced technologies such as CAD and CAM. The company can use their earnings to create new technologies and lines of businesses. This gives investors and employees a clear sign that the company is making changes to stay competitive by transitioning from a machine parts manufacturer to a high technology innovator.
2. 40% dividend payout or a dividend of $0.20 a share: This option gives a 40% dividend payout implying an annual dividend of $0.80 a share. This could reassure investors that the company was back on its feet and optimistic of future earnings. Investors could also see this as a conflict with the growth strategy of the company. Gainesboro would also have to borrow to pay this dividend which would put a strain on cash flow making growth more difficult. Gainesboro has also been known to avoid debt.
3. Residual-dividend payout: This option would pay dividends to shareholders only after Gainesboro’s projects offered a positive net present

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Gainesboro Machine Tools Corporation Teaching Note

...GAINESBORO MACHINE TOOLS CORPORATION Teaching Note Synopsis and Objectives Other cases in which dividend policy is an important issue: “Deutsche Brauerei,” (Case 11) In mid September 2005, Ashley Swenson, the chief financial officer (CFO) of a large computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) equipment manufacturer needed to decide whether to pay out dividends to the firm’s shareholders, or to repurchase stock. If Swenson chose to pay out dividends, she would have to also decide upon the magnitude of the payout. A subsidiary question is whether the firm should embark on a campaign of corporate-image advertising, and change its corporate name to reflect its new outlook. The case serves as an omnibus review of the many practical aspects of the dividend and share buyback decisions, including (1) signaling effects, (2) clientele effects, and (3) the finance and investment implications of increasing dividend payouts and share repurchase decisions. This case can follow a treatment of the Miller-Modigliani dividend-irrelevance theorem and serves to highlight practical considerations to consider when setting a firm’s dividend policy. Suggested Questions for Advance Assignment to Students The instructor could assign supplemental reading on dividend policy and share repurchases. Especially recommended are the Asquith and Mullins article on equity signaling, and articles by Stern Stewart on financial communication. 1. In theory, to fund an increased...

Words: 5756 - Pages: 24

Premium Essay

Deluxe Corporation Teaching Note

...DELUXE Corporation Teaching Note Synopsis and Objectives Suggestions for complementary cases in capital structure choice and financial flexibility: “The Wm. Wrigley, Jr. Company: Capital Structure, Valuation, and Cost of Capital,” (case 30); “Rosario Acero S.A.,” (case 32); “Gainesboro Machine Tools Corporation,” (case 25) In July 2002, an investment banker advising Deluxe Corporation must prepare recommendations for the company’s board of directors regarding the firm’s financial policy. Some special considerations are the mix of debt and equity, maintenance of financial flexibility, and the preservation of an investment-grade bond rating. Complicating the assessment are low growth and technological obsolescence in the firm’s core business. The student must recommend an appropriate financial policy for the firm and, in support of that recommendation, must show the impact on the firm’s cost of capital, financial flexibility (i.e., unused debt capacity), bond rating, and other considerations. This case may be used to pursue a number of teaching objectives: • Survey the determinants of corporate bond ratings. The case highlights the important influence of the rating agencies on the costs of debt and the access to capital markets. The case data affords students the opportunity to explore profitability, coverage ratios, and capitalization ratios as measures of credit quality. • Explore the practical challenges involved in determining the optimal...

Words: 4191 - Pages: 17