Gap Inc. 2010

In: Business and Management

Submitted By StefanKnoedler
Words 2745
Pages 11
Short Case Analysis of
Gap Inc. in 2010: Is the Turnaround Strategy Working?
Author of the article Annette Lohman of the California State University, Long Beach


The Gap Inc. In 2010 Case Summary

Case Summary
This case study describes the business environment of the apparel market and how Gap Inc. tried in this highly competitive market environment to manage a turnaround in the time between 2000 and 2010. The U.S. clothing store sector accounted for approximately $156 billion in the year 2009 and had slightly declined compared to 2008 due to the worldwide recession. Average before-tax profits estimated by IBIS-World were around 3% in the year 2009. The level of globalization in the market is relatively low and made up by a large number of small and few major, domestically owned companies. The family clothing store industry is the most important sector, as it is responsible for more than half of the revenues in the U.S. clothing market. Concerning the gender woman clothes are most interesting, due to their will to spend more. Women clothing accounts for 50% of the market, followed by men and children with market shares of 37% and 13%. Hereby more than one third of the adult population has to be considered obese. According to price sensitivity 65% of the market is value-priced driven and targeted by family stores of companies such as Ross Stores or TJX Companies. They focus on still wanted brand names and discounts by delivering off-season styles. More emotional driven fashion and brand-conscious customers rather shop at Gap or Abercrombie & Fitch and are influenced by marketing efforts. These four companies are the major rivals in the family clothing store industry. These big players account for 40% of the Market, the rest is highly fragmented and consists of thousands of small local or regional retailers with little individual market shares.

20%
19%…...

Similar Documents

Discussion Case: the Gap Inc.’S Social Responsibility Report

...Discussion Case: The Gap Inc.’s Social Responsibility Report 1. Do you think Gap has demonstrated global corporate citizenship, as defined in this chapter? Why or why not? Gap has demonstrated global corporate citizenship because they develop one of the most comprehensive factory- monitoring programs in the apparel industry. 2. In its response to problems in its contractor factories, do you think Gap moved through the stages of corporate citizenship presented in this chapter? Why or why not? Gap move through the stages of corporate citizenship because they recognize their problem, develop a program to address the issue, made a pledge to do business with vendors with a high set of standards, they expanded discrimination section of the Universal Declaration of Human Right, and also hired dozens of vendors compliance officers, or VCOs to audit Gap factories. 3. Compare Gap Inc.’s social audit and reporting practices with those of others companies described in the chapter. In what ways is Gap’s effort different, and in what ways is it similar? Do you think Gap’s social auditing and reporting is better or worse than those of other companies, and why? What differs is that the other companies utilized a multiple stakeholder governance structure so that the firm interacts with many of the stakeholders it seeks to serve though its multiple performance targets. On the other hand what’s similar is that many companies commit to social responsive practices. 4. Will......

Words: 278 - Pages: 2

Apple Inc, in 2010 Case Study

... and development * Strengthen current products and increase capabilities of software such as Siri, iClould, and applications * Develop new hardware for the existing systems such (camera and video capabilities) * Explore New markets, do not limit to just a few segments open up internationally * Emerge in new economies that are under saturated with Apple products. * Enforce stricter product testing to ensure less product recalls In conclusion Apple is a very stable company financially and extremely innovative for future products and services. As long as they can keep up with competition, as well as, the consumer Apple will continue to make profits and keep in the top ranking companies. Apple will need to adjust to the times and keep coming up with new and improved technology. Apple has already set a number of records in performance going into the fourth quarter of 2010. “The company’s quarterly revenue of 15.7 billion was its highest ever quarterly sales figure, and the company set a new record for quarterly shipments of computers, with 3.47 million Macs shipped during the quarter” (Marino, pg.203). The future looks bright for Apple and with the proper leadership and innovations they will continue to succeed. Bibliography Marino, L. (2010). Apple Inc. in 2010. In L. Marinr, Quantitative Thinking (pp. 191-204). New York....

Words: 3175 - Pages: 13

Gap Inc

.... Exhibit A |Valuation of The Gap using the Discounted Abnormal Earnings Model | |Year |BVE | |+ Beginning Book Value |2,755,000,000 | |= Equity Value |4,691,057,855 | Exhibit B | | |Determining R(e) using the CAPM | |R(f) - Ten year treasury bill (2/28/12) |2.20% | |GPS beta |1.25 | |Average Market Rate of Return |10.5% | | | | |R(e) = 2.2 + 1.25(10.5 – 2.2) = 12.575% | |  |Jan-12 |Jan 2011 |Jan 2010 ......

Words: 1590 - Pages: 7

Gap Inc. 2010

...Short Case Analysis of Gap Inc. in 2010: Is the Turnaround Strategy Working? Author of the article Annette Lohman of the California State University, Long Beach The Gap Inc. In 2010 Case Summary Case Summary This case study describes the business environment of the apparel market and how Gap Inc. tried in this highly competitive market environment to manage a turnaround in the time between 2000 and 2010. The U.S. clothing store sector accounted for approximately $156 billion in the year 2009 and had slightly declined compared to 2008 due to the worldwide recession. Average before-tax profits estimated by IBIS-World were around 3% in the year 2009. The level of globalization in the market is relatively low and made up by a large number of small and few major, domestically owned companies. The family clothing store industry is the most important sector, as it is responsible for more than half of the revenues in the U.S. clothing market. Concerning the gender woman clothes are most interesting, due to their will to spend more. Women clothing accounts for 50% of the market, followed by men and children with market shares of 37% and 13%. Hereby more than one third of the adult population has to be considered obese. According to price sensitivity 65% of the market is value-priced driven and targeted by family stores of companies such as Ross Stores or TJX Companies. They focus on still wanted brand names and discounts by delivering off-season styles. More emotional...

Words: 2745 - Pages: 11

Financial Performance: Nike Inc and Gap Inc.

...Gap Inc. and Nike, Inc. Overview Gap Inc. and Nike, Inc. Overview Financial Performance: Nike, Inc and Gap Inc. Nike, Inc. and Gap Inc. achieved top ranks for specialty retailers of 2007 according to CRO (Corporate Responsibility Officer, 2007) Magazine for “100 Best Corporate Citizens 2007.” Shareholders review various financial reports which help determine which organization yields the greatest profits and minimum loss in cash flow. This review contains two-year comparisons for Nike, Inc. and Gap Inc. by analyzing ratios for Liquidity and Asset Utilization, Debt and Interest Coverage, and Market based ratios. Analysts evaluate market and industry trends periodically that help determine where a company is most profitable. Usually, stockholders are interested in profitability ratios. However, lenders and suppliers favor liquidity ratios detailing how assets compare with current liabilities. Respectively, according to results for Liquidity and Asset Utilization, the current ratios, (current assets / current liabilities) shows for every $1.00 of current liabilities for Nike, Inc. has 3.1:1 (2007) and 2.8:1 (2006). On the other hand, Gap Inc. has 2.2:1 (2007) and 2.7:1 (2006). Specialty retailers’ average return is greater than 3 and the general retail average is 1.0 - 1.2. Nike, Inc. at 3.1:1 (2007) has the greatest financial responsibility to pay bills over the next year timely. However, Gap Inc. also has money to meet obligations with a 2.7:1 (2006) which is...

Words: 1548 - Pages: 7

Gap Inc

...Gap Inc. in 2010: Is the turnaround strategy working? Gap Inc. is a leading international specialty retailer offering clothing, accessories and personal care products for men, women, children and babies. Gap owned and operated more than 3,100 Gap, Banana Republic and Old Navy stores world wide in 2010. With stores located in the U.S, UK, Canada, France, Japan and Germany, Gap Inc. employees nearly 165,000 employees world wide. Since 2002 Gap Inc. has been a number of issues including the declining sales of the family clothing store industry. During this time many turnaround strategies have been implemented in the attempt to eliminate long term debt, redesign the companies online presence, create a new e-commerce platform, expensing internationally and improving quality, styling and overall image. Through this adoption since 2002, the market share and sales of Gap Inc. have still decreased and the brand image has also taken a hit. An Internal analysis shows that even though sales have decreased, Gaps financial performance has strengthened year on year. Gap’s Liquidity, leverage and profitability have shown a stead increase that has helped the company maintain a stronger business situation than competitors throughout the recession. A SWOT analysis of Gaps Inc.’s internal structure shows strengths in net profit margins, a strong franchising model and the reinstatement of their strong brand image. Weaknesses include high levels of competition, large amount of...

Words: 608 - Pages: 3

Apple Inc. in 2010

...Case Study 8: Apple Inc. in 2010 By reviewing performances of each product line and analyzing the financial statements before 2010, we suggest Apple to keep all of its business segments, because personal media players and personal computers have played an important role in Apple’s longevity, and Smart phones and tablet computers are critical divers of revenues in the present and future. First, personal media players product line should not be dropped since it was not only the driver of “hallo effect,” but also the leader of personal media player industry. Dropping this product line will cause adverse conjecture about the future of Apple and affect the stock price dramatically, because this business segment created “hallo effect,” helping other products of Apple became popular with customers in the past years, which means it was considered by publics as the icon product to Apple. In addition, there is no need to drop this line. Although there were a lot of producers in the digital music players industry, Apple held 73% market share in 2010, and none of rivals with very little market share in this industry can compete with Apple. Because of the significance and absolute predominance of personal media players, Apple should not drop its media players line. Second, since personal computers is a potential market which has big growth space, and this sector is the main business for Apple, Apple should not get rid of this product line. With the worldwide recovering economy, the...

Words: 665 - Pages: 3

Business Ethics at Gap Inc.

... (Tanner, 2010). 5.2. Campaign against Child Labour Gap Inc. declared that they have a zero-tolerance policy against child labour, which means that they will immediately address the problem when it occurs as seen in their reaction to the BBC documentary discussed before. Gap also invests in different organizations like the Self Employed Women’s Association and Bachpan Bachao Andolan, which teaches children that they are not obligated to work (Gap Inc, 2013d). 5.3. Monitoring Another step towards better social responsibility is a better monitoring of the different factories. The previous incidents have shown that Gap Inc. does not always know the working conditions in their factories and whether they respect the Code of Vendor Conduct. With the help of monitoring the factories, Gap Inc. tries to prevent and address bad working conditions (Gap Inc., 2013e). The creation of a Monitoring and Vendor Development team, which consists of people who speak the language of the monitored suppliers, helps improving the working conditions. By making announced and unannounced visits, the Social Responsibility Specialists will quickly trace and solve possible problems (Gap Inc., 2013f). As seen on the chart, the last 3 years more and more factories respect the Code of Vendor Conduct. By using this data, Gap can decide where there is room for improvement (Gap Inc., 2013g). Figure [ 1 ] 2009-2011 Factory Ratings comparison 6. Conclusion With its Code of...

Words: 2155 - Pages: 9

Apple Inc. in 2010

...Key Success Factors There are several key success factors for Apple, Inc. that have made it successful in the markets that it competes in. First, the company is constantly coming up with new and creative innovations. In the personal computer industry, it created MacBooks in 2009. In the personal media player industry Apple created the iPod. This followed with the creation of the itunes store, which catapulted iPod sales. This was due to the fact that consumers could download and store music, movies, and applications and use iTunes in conjunction with the iPod. In 2007, Apple entered the smartphone industry by launching the iPhone. Finally, in 2010, Apple introduced the iPad (Thompson, Peteraf, Gamble, & Strickland, 2012) .The iPad is the product that put the entire tablet industry on the map. Apple's innovation was ingenious in that its products are linked together with one another. iPods, iPads, and iPhones are nearly identical in the way they are run and they all are used with iTunes. Users are able to run their songs, movies, and applications on all of the above products. This creates a huge halo effect as many consumers choose Apple products when shopping for portable music devices, tablets, and phones because there is very little learning curve from one product to the next and they can download their iTunes purchases onto all of their Apple products. These products show how innovative Apple is and leave competitors scrambling to launch products to...

Words: 747 - Pages: 3

Apple Inc 2010 - Case Study

... innovative products and bring new features to the market. Through innovation they shaped the market of personal media players. 3. The competitive strength assessment reveals about Apple’s computer business is that Hewlett Packard and Dell seem to be the leaders in the computer industry. Toshiba being the weakest in the computer industry. Apple’s competitive position in personal media players and smart phones, is stronger than its position in the computer industry. In 2010, Apple had the highest market share of 73% whilst competitors in the same industry were not able to gain a market share greater than 5%. Their competitive strength assessment is stronger in personal media players and smart phones due to their ability of innovation and design. 4. I think it makes sense for Apple to compete in the computer, personal media, mobile phone and tablet computer industries. Their main ability to develop computers with their own operating systems and software helped them to grow because, they were able to shift those features and ideas into other products. For example, iTunes was created to be used on their computers but they were able to integrate the software on to the iPod and iPhone which helped them to dominate the markets. I believe the value chains are similar because, I would think that the research and supporting activities of all the products are similar. The same technology is used for the product lines difference might just be in versions or upgrades. The only......

Words: 1109 - Pages: 5

Apple Inc. in 2010

...After Steve Jobs took over as interim CEO of Apple in September of 1997 the company moved from being solely a PC company to creating several new and innovative products, contributing to the company's extreme success. In 2001 Jobs presented his "Digital Hub" strategy involving the Mac computer. This strategy that had been implemented to the Macintosh and other products resulted in Apple becoming the fourth-largest PC vendor in the US. Jobs' digital hub strategy was expanded with the release of the Apple iPod in 2001, followed by the iPhone in 2007, and the iPad in 2010. Although Apple had several great success with Jobs as CEO, the company faced some occasionally failures as well. The Mac Mini did not sell as well as the company had hoped due to limited memory and few expansion options. Another disappointment that Apple faced was the Apple TV. Apple has been able to differentiate themselves from other competitors in the PC industry due to the innovative digital hub strategy that Jobs founded and implemented in the Mac PC. He saw that people were becoming more enriched in a digital lifestyle and used the Mac as the "hub" to control and integrate these other digital devices that people were using day to day. This digital hub strategy ultimately changed the PC industry, creating a lower level of rivalry within the industry. The characteristics of the PC Industry may not have proven to be favorable for Apple, however, the company seems to be able to continue to be a leading...

Words: 559 - Pages: 3

Gap Inc Summary

...• Gap Inc. has the components of a global retailer: centralized, standardize, and vertically integrated o (They look for countries that will except their company as is without much change… this is true to Gap Inc. the biggest change in their merchandise came during the move to Japan where they altered their clothing size to fit them) • Although most of gaps revenue (about 89 %) comes from domestic sales, it has expanded internationally to the United Kingdom, Canada, Germany, France, and Japan • Gap Inc. has acquired several other brands in order to expand its target market while still staying true to its original Gap aesthetics • An example of this took place in Germany. While moving its company there they realized it was not brining in revenue, in fact it was the companies smallest international business. Gap, Inc. decided to acquire H&M in order to optimize their growth. • Brands Include: Gap, Banana Republic, Old Navy, Intermix, piperlime, and athleta • More then 150, 000 employees and approximately 3700 stores worldwide • -400 franchise stores • -United Kingdom: In 1987 gap opened their first store outside the United States, which was located in London. Today there are approximately 189 stores located in Europe • Canada: gap Inc. largest international market. In 1998 Canada was introduced to its first gap store. Gap has continuously kept the strategy of opening big stores, their biggest, and extensive advertisement strategies in Canada • -Germany: 1990s...

Words: 535 - Pages: 3

Gap Inc. Case Study

... |  |  |  | 24.00 | 24.00 | | International | 1,752.00 | 442.00 | 180.00 | 8.00 | 2,406.00 | |Total | 6,246.00 | 6,484.00 | 2,431.00 | 8.00 | 15,193.00 | Main Issues to Address in 2010 General Issues Gap, Inc. Faces All three of Gap’s brands face similar issues in the apparel industry. These issues are the recession that is currently affecting many countries, the necessity and difficulty of keeping up with the latest fashion fads, and establishing stores in locales that have similar stores in order to attract consumers. Although Gap, Banana Republic, and Old Navy face some unique issues, these are issues that they will have to work towards in the next year. Issues facing Gap In order for Gap to continue being a best-cost provider of apparel in the family apparel industry they will need to develop unique expertise in cutting costs while incorporating upscale features and attributes. Due to the worldwide recession this is even more imperative in order to attract buyers. Issues facing Banana Republic Banana Republic’s competitive strategy is different than the Gap brand, which means they will face some unique issues. In order to maintain its position as a focused differentiation provider they need to know their target consumer......

Words: 5362 - Pages: 22

Apple Inc. in 2010

...Case analysis: Apple Inc. in 2010 Jingbo Liu 11529267 1. What, historically, have been Apple’s competitive advantages? 1) Keep the original though to try build the foundation of apple company. When entering in the late 1990s, the computer out from the laboratory as well as some important institutions to enter the market for personal use, then the computer began to uncover the mystery of it, and the explosive growth stages. And Apple has not been the market during the impetuous move, still adheres to a dozen years, we insist on doing their own technologies and platforms.    2) The independent technology to create a completely independent operating platform. MAC system use different subcode with any other system like android and Microsoft, which is extremely difficult to crack. Of course you can see Apple's products are also constantly increased, from MAC, iPhone, ipad and so on, until the iTV, etc., will continue to be unique in the field of information technology.   3) Apple's marketing model seemingly unique tradition but also advance. Apple different marketing tools used in conjunction with local conditions. Clearly it can be seen in the United States it is a populist image, consumers can enjoy Apple brought the trend of breath at the first time. 2. Analyze the personal computer industry. Are the dynamics favorable or problematic for...

Words: 898 - Pages: 4

Analysis of Gap Inc. Multichannel Strategy

...://digiday.com/brands/inside-gaps-fall-2014-campaign-dressnormal/ . Accessed on: (15 February 2016). Emrich, O. & Paulb, M. & Rudolphc, T. (2015) “Shopping Benefits of Multichannel Assortment Integration and the Moderating Role of Retailer Type”. Journal of Retailing, Vol. 91 (2), pp. 326–342. Euromonitor (2015) Apparel and Footwear in 2015: Trends, Developments and Prospects. Available at: http://www.portal.euromonitor.com/portal/analysis/tab . Accessed on: (12th February 2016). Euromonitor (2015) Gap Inc., the in Apparel and Footwear (World). Available at: http://www.portal.euromonitor.com/portal/analysis/tab . Accessed on: (15th February 2016). Gap Inc. (2015) Gap Inc.'s Global Footprint. Available at: http://www.gapinc.com/content/attachments/gapinc/GPSEarnings/Global%20Footprin t.pdf. Accessed on: (18th February 2016). Gap Inc. (2014) 2014 Annual Report. Available at: http://www.gapinc.com/content/attachments/gapinc/GPS%202014%20Annual%20Re port.pdf. Accessed on: (10th February 2016). Herhausena, D. & Binderb, J. & Schoegela, M. & Herrmannc, A. (2015). “Integrating Bricks with Clicks: Retailer-Level and Channel-Level Outcomes of Online–Offline Channel Integration”. Journal of Retailing. Vol. 91 (2), pp. 309-325. Lee, H. and Kim, J. (2010). “Investigating Dimensionality of Multichannel Retailer’s Cross-Channel Integration Practices and Effectiveness: Shopping Orientation and Loyalty Intention”. Journal of Marketing Channels, Vol. 17 (1), pp.......

Words: 3873 - Pages: 16