Premium Essay

Gas and Multifuel

In: Other Topics

Submitted By cami186
Words 2951
Pages 12
GAS AND MULTI-FUEL POWER PLANTS

The Sheki power plant in Azerbaijan is equipped with 10 x Wärtsilä 20V34SG engines.

WÄRTSILÄ GAS AND MULTI-FUEL POWER PLANTS’ BENEFITS:
• Plant electrical efficiency over 53% • Fast start-up – 2 min from hot standby to full plant load • Combined heat and power as an option • Excellent plant availability and reduced need for back-up capacity due to multi-unit installation • High part-load efficiency • Low gas pressure requirement • Maintenance schedule independent of the number of starts, stops or trips • Full plant output at high altitudes and in hot and dry ambient conditions • Minimal water consumption due to closed-circuit radiator cooling • Stepwise investment with smaller risks and optimized profit generation.

2

ICE-strengths: Relatively high efficiency at small scale; modular; rapid start-up; lower capital cost than OCGT; tolerant of different fuel qualities
Source: Internal Energy Agency: Energy Technology Perspective – Harnessing Electricity’s Potential, 2014

Whether you need baseload, intermediate, peaking or standby power generation, we provide it. WÄRTSILÄ® gas and multifuel plants are typically based on modular 4–19 MW internal combustion engine (ICE) units. ICEs are designed for continuous operation on natural gas or in multi-fuel mode (gas/oil). Our gas and multi-fuel power plants offer high output and efficiency even in the most challenging conditions and locations. In the hottest deserts or high in the mountains, in city centres or jungles, energy output and efficiency is consistent and reliable, throughout the entire load range. And the fact that a negligible amount of water is consumed in the process has obvious advantages, too, particularly in dry locations. World-class operational flexibility with uniquely fast starts, stops and restarts, ensures

perfect control over daily load fluctuations....

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Gas Prices

...Federal Trade Commission DEBORAH PLATT MAJORAS ORSON SWINDLE THOMAS B. LEARY PAMELA JONES HARBOUR JON LEIBOWITZ Maryanne Kane Charles H. Schneider Susan A. Creighton Lydia B. Parnes Luke Froeb William Blumenthal Anna H. Davis Nancy Ness Judy Maureen K. Ohlhausen Donald S. Clark Chairman Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Chief of Staff Executive Director Director, Bureau of Competition Director, Bureau of Consumer Protection Director, Bureau of Economics General Counsel Director, Office of Congressional Relations Director, Office of Public Affairs Director, Office of Policy Planning Secretary of the Commission Report Drafters and Contributors Louis Silvia, Assistant Director, Bureau of Economics David Meyer, Bureau of Economics Sarah M. Mathias, Office of General Counsel Policy Studies Michael S. Wroblewski, Assistant General Counsel Policy Studies Phillip L. Broyles, Assistant Director, Bureau of Competition J. Elizabeth Callison, Bureau of Economics Jeffrey Fischer , Bureau of Economics Nicolas J. Franczyk, Bureau of Competition Daniel E. Gaynor, Bureau of Economics Geary A. Gessler, Bureau of Economics James F. Mongoven, Bureau of Competition John H. Seesel, Associate General Counsel for Energy Christopher T. Taylor, Bureau of Economics Michael G. Vita, Assistant Director, Bureau of Economics Anthony G. Alcorn, Bureau of Economics Sarah Croake, Bureau of Competition Madeleine McChesney, Bureau of Economics Guru Raj, Bureau of Competition Natalie Shonka...

Words: 65952 - Pages: 264

Premium Essay

Sugar Industry

...DETAILED PROJECT REPORT OF 2500 TCD SUGAR WITH 14 MW COGENERATION PLANT For OM SUGARS PVT LTD., BC – 132 LODGE ROAD, BOGARVES CAMP, BELGAUM By Ugar Consultancy Ltd., Ugar Khurd, Tq Athani Dist Belgaum MAY 2011 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY HIGHLIGHTS OF THE PROJECT 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. INTRODUCTION NEED FOR THE PROJECT SUGAR CANE AVAILABILITY PRODUCT SALE POLICY TECHNO COMMERCIAL ASPECTS LOCATION AND SITE ASSOCIATED DETAILS TECHNICAL FEATURES (SPECIFICATIONS) OF MAJOR EQUIPMENTS 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. DESCRIPTION OF MAJOR PROCESS RISK ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT PROJECT COST ESTIMATION PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE MANPOWER REQUIREMENT LIST OF ANNEXURES 13. ANNEXURE – I KERC / KPTCL POLICY LIST OF APPENDICES 14. 15. APPENDIX – I BAGASSE ANALYSIS APPENDIX – II CANE TRASH ANALYSIS 124 125 118 – 123 85 – 97 98 – 104 105 – 109 110 – 114 115 – 117 1–8 9 – 11 12 – 16 17 – 19 20 – 36 37 – 39 40 – 47 48 – 59 60 – 84 16. 17. APPENDIX – III RICE HUSK ANALYSIS APPENDIX – IV COAL ANALYSIS LIST OF DRAWINGS 126 127 18. DRAWING – I BAGASSE BALANCE – SEASON OPERATION 128 19. 20. 21. DRAWING – II STEAM BALANCE – SEASON OPERATION DRAWING – III POWER BALANCE – SEASON OPERATION DRAWING – IV STEAM BALANCE – NON CRUSHING OPERATION 129 130 131 22. DRAWING – V POWER BALANCE – NON CRUSHING OPERATION 132 23. DRAWING – VI HEAT & MASS BALANCE - SEASON OPERATION 133 24. DRAWING – VII HEAT & MASS BALANCE – NON CRUSHING SEASON 134 25. 26.......

Words: 29039 - Pages: 117