Free Essay

Ge Alstom

In: Business and Management

Submitted By khushi89
Words 2515
Pages 11
Find our latest analyses and trade ideas on bsic.it

Alstom saga ends with a “ménage à trois”
General Electric; Market Cap: $299.6bn (as of 06/11/2015)
Alstom; Market Cap: $9.06bn (as of 06/11/2015)

Introduction
General Electric finally concluded its €9.7bn (about $10.6bn) acquisition of Alstom’s power business after getting the final regulatory approvals. The deal represents GE’s biggest ever industrial acquisition.
GE's offer was accepted by Alstom at €12.35bn in April 2014, but then the French government rightfully forced some changes in the deal structure. To win the approval from the French government, GE’s newest proposition involved setting up joint ventures in renewable energy, electricity grid equipment and nuclear power. In fact, the value of the stakes Alstom will own in the three joint ventures is estimated to be about €2.6bn which means that the net cash cost of the deal for GE is about €9.7bn. Moreover, the US and European regulators required the sell-off of part of the GE’s turbine business to the
Italian Ansaldo Energia in order to keep the market competitive. Before GE got the “green light” from Paris, there was lot of competition between GE and the joint offer of Siemens and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries for the acquisition of Alstom, even though the board of Alstom favoured GE’s clear and simple offer. Moreover, GE promised to add about 1000 new jobs in France, where it has had large existing operations for decades. On the other hand, the government liked the fact that
Mitsubishi-Siemens offer was based on forming a partnership and was not going to be a takeover. Finally, when GE modified its proposal, it won the war.
About General Electric
General Electric, headquartered in Fairfield, Connecticut (US), is a multinational leading corporation with a highly diversified business. General Electric is a key player in the Transportation, Marine, Energy and Mining industries but it also has a solid presence in the Healthcare, Retail and Food & Beverage industries.
Founded in 1878, General Electric has a tradition of innovation and excellence in the Energy division and throughout the years it has been able to explore other businesses, becoming a major player in many industries with a high customer satisfaction. At the moment, General Electric operates worldwide with offices in more than 130 countries.
General Electric’s strong position in the market is given by increasing operating margins (16.2% in 2014 and expected to grow up to 17% by the end of 2016) as well as high R&D of $10bn to $15bn each year.
GE’s operating margin is perfectly in line with the industry average, confirming the competitive position of the firm in its segment. However, ever since the CEO Mr. Immelt arrived, the company has never been able to outperform the market expectations and shares are still priced 30% less than in 2000 under the former CEO, Mr. Welch.
In 2014, GE paid out $10.8bn in dividends and in stock buybacks returning about $30mn to shareholders every day.
The General Electric’s strategy is to become the world’s best infrastructure and technology company, retaining a small financial division. General Electric is planning to drive infrastructure leadership through investments in innovations in order to achieve a greater industrial leadership.
Moreover, the recent formation of GE Digital is consolidating all digital capabilities across the company to provide customers with the best industrial solutions and software as GE keeps winning in the marketplace and delivering strong financial results.
About Alstom
Alstom, headquartered in Levallois-Perret, Paris (France), is an industrial multinational company which operates in the transportation and energy business. Alstom was originally founded in 1928 as the merger between Compagnie Française
Thomson-Houston and the Société Alsacienne de Constructions Mécaniques. About ten years ago, the French government bailed out the company providing more than €3bn in the form of equity investments, loans, and financial guarantees to
Alstom customers. The success of Alstom is the result of a strong focus on environmental and operational excellence achieved thanks to a diverse and entrepreneurial team across the globe.

Find our latest analyses and trade ideas on bsic.it The key shareholder of Alstom is the French government that in June 2014 decided to buy 20% of shares from Bouygues, a
French industrial group which has owned a considerable stake in Alstom, in order to strengthen its position on Alstom that employs thousands of people in France.

For the upcoming years, Alstom is planning to focus only on its transportation business, becoming a global player with offices in more than 60 countries worldwide.
Alstom’s sales and operating revenues increased by 7.63% YoY (from €5.73bn to €6.16bn). Despite growing revenues, an increase in cost of goods sold as a percentage of sales (from 83.90% to 84.97%) was responsible for a decline in net income, YoY, from a gain of €556mn to a loss of €719mn. EPS drop resulted from the reduction in net income. However,
Alstom still has a great liquidity with a quick ratio of 2.94 and a current ratio of 3.02. By 2020, Alstom plans to become its customers’ preferred partner for transport solutions.
Deal Structure
The deal structure turned out to be slightly more complicated than Alstom’s board and GE hoped for. In fact, it turned out to be “a living hell” as far as regulatory approval goes. Namely, the acquisition needed regulatory approval in more than 20 countries and regions, including the EU, US, China, India, Japan and Brazil.
The first part of the deal involves GE acquiring Alstom’s power business. It will take over Alstom’s main coal and gas-fired turbine operations. Adjusting for the 2014 joint ventures, price adjustments for remedies, net cash at close, changes in the deal structure and effects of the currency, the final price will be about €9.7bn($10.6bn). The deal implies the acquisition of
91.5 million Alstom shares by General Electric, almost 30% of the total. The price has been set to €35 per share with an implied premium of about €4 per share. Moreover, GE will sell its rail signalling business to Alstom for $825mn, which had sales of about €400m last year, further decreasing the cost of the acquisition.
The second part of the deal involves setting up three 50-50 joint ventures for Alstom’s grid business, its renewable energy operations, and the nuclear systems. The JVs will deliver services under the GE brand and they will be based in France providing new jobs for the country. The joint venture in renewable energy focuses on Alstom’s Offshore Wind and Hydro businesses. The other JV will create a global Grid business thanks to the combination of the assets of the two companies.
An important thing to note is that the JV in nuclear systems was created in order to assure security and growth of nuclear steam technology for France. The French government acquired 20% stake in Alstom, becoming the company’s biggest shareholder. Moreover, this move made the French state GE’s main partner in three joint ventures. Furthermore, the
French government holds a preferred, or the so-called “golden”, share in this joint venture giving it veto power and special governance rights over issues related to security and technology of nuclear plants. Alstom benefited from liquidity rights with upside sharing and downside protection on the 2.5 billion JVs with General Electric.
This is not the end of the story. The US and EU regulators required the sell-off of part of the General Electric’s turbine business in order to guarantee the competition in the industry. The actual market share of General Electric is 34% and the regulators believed that the acquisition of Alstom could have potentially driven prices higher since the only two big players would have been GE and Siemens. The GE’s large turbine business will be sold for €500 million to Ansaldo Energia, a key player in the industry with more than €1.3bn revenues and a 2014 ROI of 13.5%. Alstom will sell to Ansaldo Energia its
Power Systems Manufacturing unit and it will also cede two test facilities for these turbines in Switzerland. Moreover, the
Italian company will take over Alstom’s long-term contracts gaining a foothold in the maintenance business and having a real chance to compete in the European market. The deal will give Ansaldo Energia the opportunity to double revenues in the upcoming 5 years increasing its market share from 7% to 10% and becoming the 5th player in the industry also thanks to the latest technology it acquired. The reason GE chose Ansaldo Energia, instead of other competitors, is that General
Electric’s management believes that if things will go well for Ansaldo Energia, GE will have a strong competitor but not one to be afraid of. Otherwise, GE will benefit from less competition in the industry.
Alstom said it will buy back about $3.5 billion shares thanks to the new funds provided by the sell-off of its energy business to General Electric.
Deal Rationale
Why is this deal beneficial to General Electric?
The Alstom businesses give GE a much stronger position in steam turbines used in coal-fired, gas-fired and nuclear power plants, and in power grid equipment, as well as a much larger installed base of power plants for its service operations.

Find our latest analyses and trade ideas on bsic.it Moreover, this deal came as a result of GE’s strategy to become a simpler company focused on its industrial business. To be able to execute this strategy, the company decided to spin-off of its store credit business Synchrony Financial and to sell
GE Capital assets, which are worth $126bn, reducing the group’s reliance on its revenues. The Alstom deal puts the company closer to its target of deriving 70% of the group’s earnings from industrial manufacturing and service business and only 30% from financial services, which last year stood at 47% of the group’s earnings. Once both the Alstom deal and the spin-off of Synchrony Financial are finalized, earnings from financial services should drop to c.25%, making the company more attractive for investors who do not want the exposure to the financial services sector when investing in GE. Basically, it is a move that should help GE extract more value by focusing on its core business.

As for the Alstom deal, GE told investors that it expects to realize cost synergies of $3bn during the next five years after the two companies combine their operations. The company expects the deal to be accretive on its earnings. Namely, GE expects the deal to generate .05-0.08 of earnings per share in 2016 and .15-0.20 of earnings per share by 2018.
What about Alstom?
Some analysts wondered if the deal would leave Alstom’s new transport-focused business small and unable to cope with the larger players such as Bombardier, Siemens or the Chinese giants CNR and CSR.
The CEO of Alstom remained confused about those claims, as last year he tried organizing the IPO of Alstom’s transport business and was accused of selling “the family jewels”. He defended the deal saying that the business has more than €5bn in sales and the potential to improve the margins. The transport business of Alstom is solid as it has steady sales and margins growth; therefore there is no need to worry about its size. Alstom’s transportation business has a better strategic position than its energy business so the deal is bound to help Alstom focus on what it does best and extract a higher value of its business. Moreover, as previously mentioned, Alstom is going to buy GE’s signalling operations which had sales of about €400m last year and it has future alliance plans with GE in the rail business. Furthermore, after it collects the deal proceeds, it will use the cash to pay off part of its debt and fund acquisitions. It will be able to have a solid balance sheet and focus on its growth in the transportation industry.

Economic patriotism at its best
Even though the government gave an advantage to the Mitsubishi-Siemens proposal, claiming that partnership would be a better choice than a takeover, it decided to give its approval to GE after it offered similar conditions and was favoured by the board of Alstom. Among other reasons, the Alstom board was supporting the GE offer, in part due to concerns that the rival offer would give Mitsubishi the power to veto future tender bids that competed directly with the Japanese group.
In fact, Mitsubishi competes with Alstom for projects across Europe and Asia.
Arnaud Montebourg, France’s economy and industry minister undoubtedly played a big role in defining the structure of this deal. When the news about the deal leaked in April, the government immediately blocked the offer claiming that this was not just a corporate deal but much more, as a lot of things were at stake. Alstom was bailed out a decade ago by the taxpayers and its main client is the public, this made the deal a national issue. The government was mainly concerned about safeguarding the French control of Alstom’s nuclear business and the jobs of the French people. Therefore, French state decided to buy 20% stake in Alstom by acquiring most of the existing shareholding of Bouygues, the French conglomerate.
And as previously stated, it now represents GE’s main partner in three joint ventures and has veto power with its golden share. During the Alstom saga, Mr. Montebourg and Mr. Valls issued a decree extending the range of sectors subject to state veto on takeovers from defence, technology and betting to include the energy, transport, telecoms, water and health sectors. In the case of Alstom, the government believed it was important to understand that the deal had a wider specter. It was not only a corporate matter but also a political one.
GE was advised by Centerview Partners LLC, Credit Suisse Group AG and Lazard Ltd. Alstom was advised by Bank of
America Corp. and Rothschild.

Find our latest analyses and trade ideas on bsic.it Tags: General Electric, Alstom, Siemens, Mitsubishi, Bouygues, GE Capital, Acquisitions, joint ventures, French government, All the views expressed are opinions of Bocconi Students Investment Club members and can in no way be associated with Bocconi University. All the financial recommendations offered are for educational purposes only. Bocconi Students Investment Club declines any responsibility for eventual losses you may incur implementing all or part of the ideas contained in this website. The Bocconi Students Investment Club is not authorised to give investment advice. Information, opinions and estimates contained in this report reflect a judgment at its original date of publication by Bocconi Students Investment Club and are subject to change without notice. The price, value of and income from any of the securities or financial instruments mentioned in this report can fall as well as rise. Bocconi
Students Investment Club does not receive compensation and has no business relationship with any mentioned company.
Copyright © Nov-15 BSIC | Bocconi Students Investment Club

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Hghcghjagjghc

...MIDCAP Following are companies traded on Bomambay Stock Exchange’s MIDCAP indices (All the companies are traded along with liberated move fitting bourgeois for Midcap index) : Code | NAME | factor 532628 3i INFOTECH LTD 0.50  532273 CENTURION BN 0.60 523395 3M INDIA LTD 0.20  500280 CENTURY ENKA 0.45 523204 ABAN LOYD 0.40  500040 CENTURY TEXT 0.60 500488 ABBOTT (I) 0.40  500084 CESC LTD. 0.60 521064 ABHISHEK IND 0.35  500085 CHAMBAL FERT 0.55 512599 ADANI EXPORT 0.45  517326 CMC LTD. 0.50 530707 AFTEK INFOS. 0.90  500830 COLGATE PALM 0.50 506235 ALEMBIC LTD. 0.40  506395 COROMA.FERT. 0.30 505885 ALFA LAVAL 0.40  512093 CRANES SOFTW 0.70 521070 ALOK INDS. 0.75  500092 CRISIL LTD. 0.45 522275 ALSTOM LTD. 0.35  500093 CROMPT.GREAV 0.50 532309 ALSTOM POWER 0.35  500480 CUMMINS (I) 0.50 532201 AMBUJA CEMENT E 0.05  532545 DABUR PHARMA 0.25 520077 AMTEK AUTO 0.65  532528 DATAMATICS TECH 0.35 508869 APOLLO HOSP. 0.55  523367 DCM SHR.CON 0.50 500877 APOLLO TYRES 0.50  532608 DECCAN CHRONICL 0.25 500101 ARVIND MILLS 0.65  500645 DEEPAK FERT. 0.60 515030 ASAHI INDIA GLA 0.45  532121 DENA BANK 0.50 500023 ASIAN HOTELS 0.40  500119 DHAMPUR SUGA 0.55 532493 ASTRAMICR 0.40  532526 DISHMAN PHARMA 0.30 506820 ASTRAZEN.PH. 0.10  532488 DIVI’S LAB. 0.50 526991 ATLAS COPCO 0.20  523618 DREDGING COR 0.25 524804 AUROB.PHARMA 0.50  509516 DSP MERRILL 0.05 505010 AUTO AXLES 0.30  500125 E.I.D.PAR 0.65 500463 AVAYA GLOBALCON 0.45  505200 EICHER......

Words: 749 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Business Paper

...29% of the total revenue), and industrial products (accounting for 10% of the total revenue), it serves customers in more than 100 countries. 2. What is General Electric’s strategy for future? The firm’s strategy for future is to divest consumer-facing assets because of the volatile and highly competitive nature of the consumer facing business, and acquire and boost commercial- facing assets. 3. How does General Electric intend to grow? Does if grow through acquisitions? Yes, the firm grows through acquisitions. Its much-awaited “Alstom” acquisition is set to close halfway through the campaign. The firm’s strategic growth model focuses on building global relationships with sponsors, vendors, Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM’s), and global mid-market corps. Expanding product franchising is also another key aspect of their model. The firm expects a growth in its EPS in both 2015 and 2016 even as it repositions GE capital and expects gains to equal restructuring. 4. What is General Electric’s competitive environment? Who are its main competitors? The worldwide competition in aircraft jet engines and MRO (including parts sales) is intense. Both U.S. and export markets are important. Product development cycles are long...

Words: 1012 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

None

...Study Case from Modern Banking by Shelagh Heffernan - Kidder Peabody Group – ‘‘But Leo’’, said Alan Horrvich, a third-year financial analyst at General Electric Capital Corporation (GECC) in September 1987: ‘‘I don’t know anything about investment banking. If I walk in there with a lot of amateurish ideas for what he ought to do with Kidder, Cathart will rip me apart. OK, you’re the boss, but why me?’’ ‘‘Look Alan’’, replied Mr Leo Halaran, Senior Vice-President, Finance of GECC: ‘‘we’ve got ten thousand things going on here right now and Cathart calls up and says, very politely, that he wants somebody very bright to work with him on a strategic review of Kidder Peabody. You’re bright, you spent a semester in the specialised finance MBA programme at City University Business School in London, you earned that fancy MBA from New York University down there in Wall Street, and you are available right now, so you’re our man. Relax, Si isn’t all that tough. If you make it through the first few weeks without getting sent back, you’ve got a friend for life. . .’’, he ended with a grin. ‘‘Me.’’ Mr Silas S. Cathart, 61, had retired as Chairman and CEO of Illinois Tool Works in 1986. He had been a director of the General Electric Company for many years and was much admired as a first-rate, tough though diplomatic results-oriented man- ager. After the resignation of Mr Ralph DeNunzio as Chairman and CEO of Kidder Peabody following the management......

Words: 2864 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Mg 495 Anaylisis of General Electric

...the General Electric Company INTRODUCTION The General Electric Company (GE) is ranked among Fortune 500 as the 6th largest firm in the U.S. by gross profit as well as the 14th most profitable, #7 for executives, #5 best global brand, #82 green companies, #13 most respected companies and #19 most innovated firms. GE divisions include GE Capital, GE Energy, GE Technology Infrastructure and GE Home and Business Solutions. Through these divisions, GE is able to participate in a wide variety of markets, from industrial to lending and insurance. It sells a variety of products like lighting, industrial automation, medical imaging, motors, railway locomotives, jet engines and transmission/distribution of electricity. The company is headquartered in Fairfield, Connecticut and incorporated in Schenectady, New York. It employed 301,000 (131,000 in the U.S.) people as of December 2011. (http://www.ge.com/ar2011/pdf/GE-20120224-10K-20111231.pdf) The company recorded revenues of $142.24 billion during the financial year ended December 2011 (FY2011) this is a 4.58% decrease from FY2010. The decrease in net sales for FY2011 reflects the impact of the current economy here in the U.S. The operating profit of the company was $14.07 billion in FY2011, an increase of 8.9% over 2010. The net profit was $1.45 billion in FY2011. (http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/ge/financials) HISTORY OF THE COMPANY GE was founded in 1878 by Thomas Edison in Menlo Park, NJ. In 1890 Edison......

Words: 1502 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

My Essay

...Peter Demerjian 02/24/2013 ACT 563 Course Project General Electric (GE) Table of Contents Phase 1 Initial Survey and Engagement Development Pages 1-4 Phase 2 Planning Phase Pages 4-8 Phase 3 Work Program Phase Pages 8-12 Phase 4 Field Work Phase Pages 12-19 Phase 5 Findings and Recommendations Pages 19-20 General Electric (GE) seems to be a very high profited company which seems to be growing in profitability based on the way they do business and how they train their employees to be the best at what they do. Based on the articles I have read GE prides itself in training and leading its employees to grow and mature. The culture seems very open to smart and talented business professionals. “If businesses managed their money as carelessly as they manage their people, most would go bankrupt.& The authors believe that for a CEO it is in your and your company's best interest to know what your employees are capable of. This is done by having a file on each employee - not just the basic information, but having interviews with colleagues and superiors. An example is the CEO of General Electric's appliance wing, Larry Johnston. When he decided to quit, the heads of General Electric knew exactly who the candidates were to replace him. On the same day General Electric announced his resignation they also announced his replacement. This is done through what Conaty explains as General Electric's Operating System which has three main phases: people; strategy; and operations...

Words: 5880 - Pages: 24

Premium Essay

Mrs Ankita

... Indian CA Languages: English, Hindi, Gujarati USA 92301 Date of Birth: September 25th 1983 Mobile: 0413232560 OBJECTIVE: Seeking a mutually rewarding position in accountancy & finance, which will utilise my skills and ability and provide a room for personal growth. SUMMARY: Ability to pay attention to the details. Strong organisational methods. Well developed interpersonal skills. Effective as a team member and comfortable in leading one. Self motivated and determine. EMPLOYMENT AJ GROCERY ( Australia) Working as part time, doing customer service sell of the goods to the customer taking cash. GE CAPITAL (CUSTOMER SERVICE) (CARDS UNDERWRITING) – U.K March 2007 – February 2008 GE capital bank/ GE Money, as card underwriter associate. My main responsibilities are checking customers credit history, taking decision about credit limit. Also I got authority to accept or decline application. My team leader name was Linda Brook My main duty was to handle the call of the high street store and check the credit history of the customer and issue them the store card or the master card if there credit rating are fine. Halifax plc (HBOS)(May 2006 –May 2007) Administrator – U.K I was appointed as administrator where I have to do Scaning and sorting the documents and also working with other departments like data enty, microfilming as a part of the administration work. Orange (September......

Words: 436 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Act 563 Course Project

...Course Project General Electric (GE) Table of Contents Phase 1 Initial Survey and Engagement Development Pages 1-4 Phase 2 Planning Phase Pages 4-8 Phase 3 Work Program Phase Pages 8-12 Phase 4 Field Work Phase Pages 12-19 Phase 5 Findings and Recommendations Pages 19-20 General Electric (GE) seems to be a very high profited company which seems to be growing in profitability based on the way they do business and how they train their employees to be the best at what they do. Based on the articles I have read GE prides itself in training and leading its employees to grow and mature. The culture seems very open to smart and talented business professionals. “If businesses managed their money as carelessly as they manage their people, most would go bankrupt.& The authors believe that for a CEO it is in your and your company's best interest to know what your employees are capable of. This is done by having a file on each employee - not just the basic information, but having interviews with colleagues and superiors. An example is the CEO of General Electric's appliance wing, Larry Johnston. When he decided to quit, the heads of General Electric knew exactly who the candidates were to replace him. On the same day General Electric announced his resignation they also announced his replacement. This is done through what Conaty explains as General Electric's Operating System which has three main phases: people; strategy; and operations and budgets.”......

Words: 5861 - Pages: 24

Premium Essay

Swot Analysis of Ge

...STRENGTHS Global recognition: General Electric has ventured into the world market thus gaining global recognition for its unique goods and services. In the year 2009, Forbes magazine ranked GE as the world's largest company. Hurbert (2007) notes that General Electric's brand is the world's most recognized brand. This kind of recognition has given it a competitive edge over other companies due to its ability to attract more customers. Global strength and competitiveness:The Company’s products have been recognized for their quality and the company is known for meeting customer-specific needs (General Electric, 2009). As a result, it has attracted numerous clients including corporations and government agencies and its competitive position is quite favorable. GE is the biggest lender in many of the countries where it invests with exception of the United States (Hurbert, 2007). Its power generation equipment generates a quarter of the world's electricity everyday. Excellent Management: GE utilizes a unique management style, whereby business operations are divided into business units. Each business unit plays a distinct role within the company and has its own independent management. Examples include GE Commercial Finance, GE Equipment Services, GE Energy, GE Insurance, and GE Consumer Finance among others. This kind of management style increases productivity due to the high level of accountability and efficiency that business unit managers are expected to......

Words: 1057 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Questions

...Negative Interest Rates Nominal interest rates are normally positive, but not always. Given the alternative of holding cash, and thus earning 0%, rather than lending it out, profit-seeking lenders will not lend below 0%, as that will guarantee a loss, and a bank offering a negative deposit rate will find few takers, as savers will instead hold cash. During the European sovereign-debt crisis, government bonds of some countries (Switzerland, Denmark, Germany, Finland, the Netherlands and Austria) have been sold at negative yields. Suggested explanations include desire for safety and protection against the Eurozone breaking up. More often, real interest rates can be negative, when nominal interest rates are below inflation. When this is done via government policy (for example, via reserve requirements), this is deemed financial repression, and was practiced by countries such as the United States and United Kingdom following World War II (1945) until the late 1970s or early 1980s (during and following the Post–World War II economic expansion). In the late 1970s, United States Treasury securities with negative real interest rates were deemed certificates of confiscation. Negative interest rates have been proposed in the past, notably in the late 19th century by Silvio Gesell. To prevent people from holding cash (and thus earning 0%), Gesell suggested issuing money for a limited duration, after which it must be exchanged for new bills; attempts to hold money thus result in...

Words: 1653 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Develop Supply Chain Operations Plan

...141 El-madena El-riadia st., Flat 10 Phone: 012-4592887 / 062-3305418 Qatar: 00974/55723824 | | | |Fl EL-Mallaha, Al-Moamen Tower, Suez, Egypt | E. Mail: Medhatelshiwi @yahoo.com | | | | MEDHAT AHMED MAHMOUD EL-SHIWI |[pic] | Objective: I am interested in working as an Operation Manager for your organization. I am an expert supervisor with over 23 years of experience to offer you. I enclose my resume as a first step in exploring the possibilities of employment with you. Biography: Birth Date: 17/4/1966 Nationality: Egyptian. Marital Status: Married. Military Service: Completed. Education: 5/1989 B.sc of mechanical Power Engineering, Mansoura University, Faculty Of Engineering. 7/1999 Master degree in Power Stations, Mansoura University, Faculty of......

Words: 1110 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

General Electric

...Executive Summary “GE works on things that matter. The best people and the best technologies take on the toughest challenges. Finding solutions in energy, health, home, transportation, and finance. Building, powering, moving and curing the world. Not just imagining. Doing. GE Works.” (GE’s company statement)[i] This report will analyze GE’s management of its operations by first listing the various products and services within their operational infrastructure and by breaking down GE’s competitive environment. It will then describe GE’s operational processes. The operational management analysis includes research into product/process designs, outsourcing, quality management, and the role of employees. The impact of GE’s Operations Management Leadership program will also be discussed. This report will conclude with how the management of these processes contributes to the firm’s overall strategy. With its beginnings tracing back to Thomas Edison, General Electric (GE) was founded in 1892. It is the only company that was listed in the Dow Jones Industrial Index both in the late 1800’s and now. At the end of 2011, GE was #6 on the list of Fortune 100 companies with over $125 million in annual revenues. Headquartered in Fairfield, Connecticut and operating in over 100 countries, GE employs close to 300,000 people worldwide. While many other companies were struggling to keep up during the most recent recession, GE brought......

Words: 2516 - Pages: 11

Free Essay

Term Paper

...LARGE POWER TRANSFORMERS AND THE U.S. ELECTRIC GRID Infrastructure Security and Energy Restoration Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability U.S. Department of Energy April 2014 Update Large Power Transformers and the U.S. Electric Grid This page intentionally left blank. DOE / OE / ISER April 2014 ii Large Power Transformers and the U.S. Electric Grid FOR FURTHER INFORMATION This report was prepared by the Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability under the direction of Patricia Hoffman, Assistant Secretary, and William Bryan, Deputy Assistant Secretary. Specific questions about information in this report may be directed to Dr. Kenneth Friedman, Senior Policy Advisor (kenneth.friedman@hq.doe.gov). Tiffany Y. Choi of ICF International contributed to this report. The U.S. Department of Energy would like to acknowledge the following reviewers for their contribution to this report:  ABB  American Transmission Company  Bartley, William H., Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Company, A member of the Munich Reinsurance Company  North American Electrical Reliability Corporation  Ontario Power Generation  Scott, Daniel  U.S. Department of Commerce  U.S. Department of Homeland Security  U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Cover photo sources: Large power transformer photo: Siemens.com High-voltage transmission lines photo: Utilities-me.com DOE / OE / ISER April 2014 iii Large Power......

Words: 20748 - Pages: 83

Premium Essay

Top 500 Company

...Ranking of Top 500 Companies Rank | Company | Rank | Company | Rank | Company | Rank | Company | Rank | Company | 1 | O N G C | 101 | Adani Power | 201 | Sundaram Finance | 301 | Kirloskar Oil | 401 | Himadri Chemical | 2 | TCS | 102 | Glenmark Pharma. | 202 | Rajesh Exports | 302 | Sh.Renuka Sugar | 402 | Orient Paper | 3 | Reliance Inds. | 103 | Shree Cement | 203 | Opto Circuits | 303 | H T Media | 403 | IVRCL | 4 | Coal India | 104 | M R P L | 204 | TTK Prestige | 304 | KSK Energy Ven. | 404 | Nitin Fire Prot. | 5 | ITC | 105 | Bajaj Finserv | 205 | Prestige Estates | 305 | Bombay Dyeing | 405 | SRF | 6 | St Bk of India | 106 | Wockhardt | 206 | CESC | 306 | BGR Energy Sys. | 406 | Unichem Labs. | 7 | HDFC Bank | 107 | Bhushan Steel | 207 | Madras Cement | 307 | City Union Bank | 407 | Magma Fincorp | 8 | Infosys | 108 | United Spirits | 208 | D B Corp | 308 | United Bank (I) | 408 | Elantas Beck | 9 | NTPC | 109 | Satyam Computer | 209 | Info Edg.(India) | 309 | Kennametal India | 409 | Hotel Leela Ven. | 10 | Bharti Airtel | 110 | GMR Infra. | 210 | Indiabulls Power | 310 | KPIT Infosys. | 410 | Styrolution ABS | 11 | ICICI Bank | 111 | Tech Mahindra | 211 | Voltas | 311 | Tuni Text. Mills | 411 | Gravita India | 12 | H D F C | 112 | Aditya Bir. Nuv. | 212 | Shri.City Union. | 312 | Wyeth | 412 | ICRA | 13 | Hind. Unilever | 113 | JP Power Ven. | 213 | Jindal Saw | 313 | Sadbhav Engg. | 413 | P I Inds. | 14 | Wipro | 114 | Piramal Enterp. |...

Words: 1619 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Winfdsdsdsd

...Wind Turbine Manufacturers in the U.S.: Locations and Local Impacts WINDPOWER 2010 Conference and Exhibition Dallas, Texas Suzanne Tegen May 26, 2010 NREL/PR-6A2-47913 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. Challenges to modeling Renewables Renewables represent new industries • Not isolated as an industry in conventional I/O codes Requires detailed knowledge of project costs and industry specific expenditures • Equipment, Engineering, Labor, Permitting, O&M, etc. The Wind JEDI Model • Provides a project basic project recipe for specific RE technologies • Applies Industry Specific Multipliers derived from IMPLAN National Renewable Energy Laboratory Innovation for Our Energy Future Jobs and Economic Impacts from the JEDI Model Wind Energy’s Economic Impacts JEDI Model Version W1.09.03e Local Revenue, Turbine, & Supply Chain Impacts Project Development & Onsite Labor Impacts •Construction workers •Management •Administrative support •Cement truck drivers •Road crews •Maintenance workers •Legal and siting •Blades, towers, gear boxes •Boom truck & management, gas and gas station workers; •Supporting businesses, such as bankers financing the construction, contractor, manufacturers and equipment suppliers; •Utilities; •Hardware store purchases and workers, spare parts and their suppliers Induced Impacts Jobs and earnings......

Words: 1548 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Term Paper

...profit-making business units, carries a cost to the entire business. These costs that include corporate overheads due to mismatch in synergies among the SBUs, delays in decision processes etc., do not get strike out by any direct revenue streams of the business. Therefore, it becomes a necessity for a corporate parent to justify its existence as it looks to find reasoning to whether and how it adds value to the overall business and SBUs alike. Corporate parent gives opportunity to develop lateral synergies across interrelated business units but of late these lateral relationships between businesses are often net negative rather than positive. It is also argued that most of these lateral synergies are present between independent businesses like GE. Values creations, Diversity, Leveraging resources across SBUs – Resource Stretching, are the strategic propositions that corporate parent boasts of bringing in to the overall organization. However, like in the case of Sears, Burns Philp, and most of the multi-business, there lie implicit and pervasive tendencies that contribute to unavoidable drag to the overall profitability and efficiency of the business by inherent excess diversification of the corporate parent. This leads to the widely accepted common belief of adding value not only through resource stretch but with ‘Resource Fit’ also, maintaining the idiosyncrasies of the individual SBUs in multi-business organization. Introduction: “Corporate Parenting is a philosophy......

Words: 4213 - Pages: 17