Free Essay

Genetic Engineering Is Not the Answer to Hunger

In: Science

Submitted By Rasalters
Words 2631
Pages 11
Genetic Engineering is Not the Answer to Hunger
Rachel Salters

Genetic Engineering is Not the Answer to Hunger
In the past ten years, the world has seen many changes and advances, but none hold as many possibilities as genetic engineering. Genetic engineering is turning up all over, and it is definitely here to stay. Just as computers and plastics changed most aspects of living, since they were invented, biological engineering has the potential to do the same in the future. This new technology has a wide range of possible benefits, from helping farmers and sick people, to improving foods and helping the environment. Genetic engineering may even one day be used to help solve world hunger.
Genetically engineered crops might seem an ideal solution. Yet both current data and past examples show problems and provoke doubts as to their necessity.There is no simple solution to end world hunger. Genetic engineering is not the answer, just as pesticides weren't the answer. Even increasing food production is not the answer. World hunger will only end when the underlying causes of poverty are addressed. Poverty stops people from obtaining their basic right to food - either because they have no means to purchase food or they have no access to the farmland and natural resources necessary to meet basic food needs (http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/edumat/IHRIP/circle/modules/module12.htm). Genetically engineering crops do not address the poverty that causes hunger – in fact it threatens to make it worse.
Do the proponents of genetically engineered food think that agribusiness companies will distribute such food free to the hungry poor who have no money? There was food in Ireland during the famine in the 1840’s, for example, but those who were starving had no access to it or money to buy it (Donnelly, Jim). Those who wish to banish hunger should address the social and economic inequalities that create poverty and not claim that a genetically engineered technology will solve all the problems.
Claims are often made for the potential of genetically modified food to feed the world. If genes could be manipulated to enable staple crops to grow in what are today marginal conditions, it might make a big difference for many countries which struggle to feed themselves. According to Wisegeek.com, “Genetically engineered food is cost effective. Because it is designed to resist pests and prosper under non-optimal conditions, it can also help people in areas where regular crops would not prosper. Large savings in production may lead to financial gain and help fight poverty.
The impact of genetic engineering on a sustainable world has its pros and cons. It will increase crop productivity which reduces the need for agricultural land. Most concerns about genetically modified foods fall into three categories: environmental hazards, human health risks, and economic concerns. Environmental hazards like unattended harm to other organisms became apparent when studies showing that pollen from b.t. corn caused high mortality rates in monarch butterfly caterpillars. Genetic engineering also reduces the use of herbicides and pesticides, thereby reducing the damage done to the environment through modern agrichemical farming technologies (McDonagh, Sean). On the other hand those opposed to genetic engineering argue there is little evidence to show that genetic engineering increases crop yield or reduces herbicide and pesticide use. Just as some populations of mosquitoes developed resistance to the now-banned pesticide DDT, many people are concerned that insects will become resistant to b.t. or other crops that have been genetically-modified to produce their own pesticides. They state that research has shown that genes for resistance to herbicides will outcross into the natural ecosystem, generating "super weeds," and that plants engineered to be pesticides will create resistant insect pests- self-defeating processes that will irreversibly damage the environment (McDonagh, Sean).
The human health risk of genetically modified foods is allergens. Many children in the US and Europe have developed life-threatening allergies to peanuts and other foods. There is a possibility that introducing a gene into a plant may create a new allergen or cause an allergic reaction in susceptible individuals. Gene transfer from genetically modified foods to cells of the body or to bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract would cause concern if the transferred genetic material adversely affects human health. Another real risk is the movement of genes from genetically modified plants into conventional crops or related species in the wild (referred to as “out crossing”), as well as the mixing of crops derived from conventional seeds with those grown using genetically modified crops, may have an indirect effect on food safety and food security. Also there are unknown effects on human health. There is a growing concern that introducing foreign genes into food plants may have an unexpected and negative impact on human health. In fact, around the world, from Europe to Asia, doctors and consumers are watching, the United States, with curiosity, to see whether genetically modified foods in our diet will turn out to be safe. Especially, they are watching our children, the first generation to be raised on these new biotech foods (Hart, K., pg. 9).
Then there are the economic concerns of genetically modified foods. Bringing a genetically modified food to market is a lengthy and costly process, and of course agri-biotech companies wish to ensure a profitable return on their investment. Many new plant genetic engineering technologies and genetically modified plants have been patented, and patent infringement is a big concern of agribusiness. Yet consumer advocates are worried that patenting these new plant varieties will raise the price of seeds so high that small farmers and third world countries will not be able to afford seeds for genetically modified crops, thus widening the gap between the wealthy and the poor. Genetically modifying food is an expensive technology that the farmers of the developing nations would not be able to afford easily. In the past, about 3,000 species of plants have been used for food at one time or another. Now, most of the world’s food comes from only 16 widely grown crops (Cunningham, pg 168). According to the International Programs Center, U.S. Census Bureau, the total population of the World, projected to 11/22/10 is 6,883,165,529. Genetically modified food is widespread. Farmers first planted genetically modified corn seed in 1996 (Hart, K. pg. 6). Advocates argue that feeding a world population of nine billion by mid-century means finding ways to increase food supply. This year nearly 9 million children younger than 5 will die needlessly, more than half from hunger-related causes (UNICEF). Few of these deaths are related to outright starvation, but rather to common illnesses (like diarrhea, malaria and measles) that move in on vulnerable children whose bodies have been weakened by hunger. Freedom from hunger concentrates its services on the world's poorest nations where an overwhelming 32% are moderately to severely stunted- seriously below normal height for one's age.
In the developing world, more than 1.4 billion people currently live below the international poverty line, earning less than $1.25 per day. Among this group of poor people, many have problems obtaining adequate, nutritious food for themselves and their families. As a result, 1.02 billion people in the developing world are undernourished (UNICEF). They consume less than the minimum amount of calories essential for sound health and growth. Undernourishment negatively affects people’s health, productivity, sense of hope and overall well-being. A lack of food can stunt growth, slow thinking, sap energy, hinder fetal development and contribute to mental retardation.
Economically, the effort of constantly securing food consumes valuable time and energy, allowing poor people less time for work and earning income. Pregnant women, new mothers who breastfeed infants and children are among the most at risk of undernourishment, they have fewer resources to protect themselves and their families and are already living on the margin of survival. They are vulnerable and exploited in cultures beset by poverty (Dole, McGovern, Mosser) Genetically modified foods will not alleviate the five things that do contribute to most of the world's hunger. When people are suffering from poverty they do not have the resources, whether land, tools or money- needed to grow or buy food on a consistent basis. Armed conflict and wars disrupts agricultural production, and governments often spend more on arms than on social programs. Environmental overload and over-consumption by wealthy nations and rapid population growth in poor nations strain natural resources and make it harder for poor people to feed themselves. Discrimination, lack of access to education, credit and employment -- a recipe for hunger -- is often the result of racial, gender or ethnic discrimination. Lack of clout, the final analysis of chronic hunger is caused by powerlessness. People who don't have power to protect their own interests are hungry. The burden of this condition falls most acutely on children, women and elderly people.
There is no single cause of hunger, there is no single solution. To alleviate world hunger, efforts must address root causes, be sustainable (that is, programs must pay for themselves). We must reduce poverty by helping poor people find and hold jobs or training them for jobs where they can make money. Provide information to people about the necessity of a well-balanced diet. Make farming more productive so that there will be more food for the world’s growing population. Yes genetically altered salmon grow fatter and faster than their unaltered brethren, so fish farmers will be able to produce more salmon at lower cost. I am not convinced fatter fish or more bug-resistant crops will solve world hunger. I worry whether the fish will cause allergies or alter other fish populations if it escapes.
We've learned to accept a lot of food that comes to us in, shall we say, an "altered state," seedless watermelon, farm animals bred for extra meat, cows overflowing with milk, and the multi-billion-dollar business of genetically modified crops, like soybeans and wheat. Many people feel that genetic engineering is the inevitable wave of the future and that we cannot afford to ignore a technology that has such enormous potential benefits. However, we must proceed with caution to avoid causing unintended harm to human health and the environment as a result of our enthusiasm for this powerful technology. Using this technology, governments could grow crops at faster rates and feed the masses, ending hunger all together.
This idea however, faces certain doubt, for it also has its many disadvantages: harm to nature, reduced effectiveness of pesticides, gene transfer to non-target species, health effects on human health, and economic concerns. Consider the environmental watchdogs, Greenpeace, who show their disapproval towards genetic engineering, disagreeing with the unnatural manipulation of genes, all while blaming commercial interests as one of the culprits (http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/campaigns/agriculture/problem/genetic-engineering/). Clearly, implementing this technology reaps fortunes to the engineering sector, the farming sector (those who foster genetically modified foods), and the corporate sector alike, yet the many risks and hazards associated, however, raise many doubts about its effectiveness in reducing world hunger. In fact, reports have shown that some crops have been lucratively designed to thrive only for a certain season of time; the seeds are oftentimes engineered to purposely render no cultivation whatsoever, thus forcing consumers to repurchase crops altogether. By the same token, many governments have already implemented hefty regulations, mandatory testing, or even outlawed genetically modified crops entirely.
Contrarily, some hold the belief that developing countries face a problem in that genetically modified crops are being market led and thus focusing on the wealthy countries of the world- ignoring the third world. The Royal Society in England indicate that genetically modified crops are not essentially the solution to world hunger, but do however render a “significant contribution” towards that cause (http://www.organicconsumers.org/organic/health-benefits.cfm). While the development of genetically modified crops does cultivate differing positions and biases, it’s hard to fully understand the future direction genetic modification is taking and moreover far-fetched to imagine its headed towards ending world hunger once in for all.
Hunger is a political problem, and people need to demand change from their elected officials. Overcoming the unequal distribution of food and conflict over dwindling resources are the real challenges. Globally there needs to be an increase in the standard of living and working productivity. Nonprofit organizations who work to end hunger may provide short-term emergency food in cases of drought, civil unrest, or other emergency, or they may focus on development projects that break the cycle of poverty and help ensure long-term food supplies. Genetically modified crops are not essentially the solution to world hunger, but do however render a significant contribution towards that cause.
Since hunger results from human choices, not inexorable natural forces, the goal of ending hunger is obtainable. It is no more utopian than the goal of abolishing slavery was, not all that long ago. While slowing population growth in itself cannot end hunger, the very changes necessary to end hunger-the revitalization of economic life, especially the empowerment of women-are key to reducing birth rates so that the human population can come into balance with the rest of the natural world.
It is not necessary to destroy our environment to end hunger. On the contrary, it requires protecting it by using agricultural methods that are both ecologically sustainable and with the reach of the poor. Greater fairness does not undercut the production of needed food. The only path to increased production that can end hunger is to devise food systems in which those who do the work have a greater say and reap a greater reward. Genetically modified food will not end world hunger. Perhaps not fearing the advance of the poor in the third world and understanding that their increased well-being can advance our own.

Reference

Bocco, D., What are the Pros and Cons of Genetically Engineered Food? http://www.wisegeek.com/what-are-the-pros-and-cons-of-genetically-engineered-food.htm. Retrieved November 7, 2010

McDonagh, Sean. The Pros and Cons of GE Food. http://www.columban.com/stateofplanet4.htm

Donnelly, Jim. -10-15 2010 The Irish Famine, http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/victorians/famine_01.shtml Retrieved November 8, 2010

The Right to Adequate Food, http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/edumat/IHRIP/circle/modules/module12.htm
World Population Clock: U.S. Census Bureau, International Data Base. http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/popclockworld.html. Retrieved 11/22/2010
Cunningham, W.P. and Cunningham, M.A. (2008). Principles of Environmental Science: Inquiry and Applications (Custom 4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Easton, Thomas (2008). Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Environmental Issues (13th ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.
Tandem Constructs: Preventing the Rise of Superweeds (Trends in Biotechnology, Vol 17, No 9, pp 361-366, Sep 1999)
Containment of Herbicide Resistance Through Genetic Engineering of the Chloroplast Genome (Nature Biotechnology, Vol 16, No 4, pp 345-348, Apr 1998)
UNICEF, WHO, The World Bank, the United Nations Population Division, Levels and Trends in Child Mortality, Report 2010. http://www.childinfo.org/mortality.html Retrieved November 18, 2010
Dole, Bob, McGowen, George, Mosser, Donald, (2005), Ending Hunger Now: A Challenge to Persons of Faith. Minnesota: Augsburg Fortress.
Say No to Genetic Engineering http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/campaigns/agriculture/problem/genetic-engineering/ Retrieved November 12, 2010

UK Soil Association Release Fact Sheet on Key Health Benefits of Organic Foods. http://www.organicconsumers.org/organic/health-benefits.cfm. Retrieved November 14, 2010

Hart, Kathleen (2002), Eating In The Dark: America’s Experiment with Genetically Engineered Food. Pantheon Books: New York.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Is Genetic Engineering the Answer to Ending Global Hunger?

...Is genetic engineering the answer to ending global hunger? Jennifer E. Law SCI 207 Haleh Keshtkar February 27, 2012 The controversial statement that genetic engineered food may be the solution to hunger in the world is gaining more and more interest by the media in today’s society. On the one hand, supporters of biotechnology believe that genetic engineered food ensures and sustains food security around the world as the population increases, but on the other hand, there are many concerns involved with genetically modified food. In fact, a lot of food that we eat on a daily basis contains genetically modified ingredients and usually without our knowledge. Yet, is genetic engineered food safe? Moreover, do we really need genetic modified food? Many researchers do not consider biotechnology the solution to hunger but they believe that poverty is the cause of famine in numerous countries. As a result, biotechnology raises various questions among citizens and farmers since there is the assumption that genetic engineered food is the key to eliminating global starvation (Genetically, 2010). Before weighing the pros and cons of genetic engineered food, it is essential to understand what is genetic engineered food? “Genetic engineering is a laboratory technique used by scientists to change the DNA of living organisms” (What is genetically, 2010). Scientists have learned that there are ways of changing the structure of DNA in living organisms and build customized DNA. Genetic...

Words: 1734 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Genetic Outline

...Genetic Engineering and Global Hunger Outline “Genetic engineering is a very broad term which covers a range of ways of manipulating the genetic material of an organism. It is also variously called gene manipulation, genetic manipulation, recombination DNA technology, the new genetics, and in humans only gene therapy.” (Bruce & Bruce 1999) Today many farmers and are using this technique to help produce more livestock and crops which is why this issue in agriculture is one of the most contested technologies of the past half-century. Which raises a question, is genetic engineering the answer to ending global hunger? I will look at both sides of genetic engineering ending world hunger and discuss the impact of genetic engineering on the environment. Body Paragraph # 1 Topic Sentence: Genetic Engineering on livestock Supporting Evidence: Many individuals that produce livestock in the world are turning to genetic engineering for their cows, pigs, and other livestock. The reason for this is genetic engineering can be used to create better and more productive livestock, which will boost the farmer’s milk and meat production. Since the beginning of genetic engineering, “the farming community has successfully increased the yield and efficiency of production in most agricultural species while utilizing land resources that are often unsuitable for other agricultural purposes.” (Fahrenkrug, Blake, Carlson, Doran, Van Eenennaam, Faber, & Whitelaw, 2010) Body Paragraph # 2 ...

Words: 291 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Genetic Modified Food

...food grows faster than non-GM food, so it can produce food at a faster rate. GM food is high in nutrients and can control the occurrence of diseases. Pest and disease resistant GM food can preserve the environment by reducing the use of herbicide. But there are some doubts about producing GM crops or livestock. Some experts worry about widespread distribution of GM food because GM food is not proven to be safe, may reduce biodiversity, and create “super weeds.” In spite of those opponents, GM food should become more widespread because it is a solution to world hunger; it has more nutrients than those of regular food; it reduces environmental damage, and it can help control diseases. Since Gregor Mendel’s discovery, certain traits show up in offspring without any blending of parent characteristics. People recognized the possibility of GM organism by selecting genes. According to the book, Plant Biotechnology: the Genetic Manipulation of Plants, written by Adrian Salter, the "green revolution,"  led by Norman Borlaug, Monkombu Swaminatha and Gurdev Khush, enabled the world’s food supply to be tripled during the last three decades of the 20th Century. Adopting molecular breeding biotechnology increases the amount of product and decreases the cost of production, so people can get foods at lower price....

Words: 1897 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Reflection Essay

...these scenarios have in common? Chances are fairly high that these foods contain some sort of genetically modified ingredients. Americans’ lack of knowledge about genetically modified foods was clear when a survey was conducted by the Pew Initiative on whether they had eaten them: just 24% believe they have consumed genetically modified foods (“Pew Initiative”). In the United States, an estimated 60% of processed foods now contain genetically engineered ingredients (Fox 12). With such ubiquity of genetically modified foods, there is much to be discovered about the risks and consequences of their entrance into our food supply. How do we know we are asking the right questions regarding genetically modified foods and crops? The honest answer: we don’t! To fully understand the issue at stake, we must take a look at what questions are currently being asked by delving deeply into the realm of genetically modified foods. The typical American now eats up to 34% of calories away from home; most often in the form of fast food, which is notorious for being high in fat, calories, and sugar (Spake 1). Busy Americans often do not have time to consider the specific ingredients being used in food, and most are not even aware of how widespread genetically engineered ingredients are in society today. In fact, knowledge concerning genetically modified (GM) foods remains low. In 2001, 44% had heard something about GM foods; in 2003, that number dropped to 34% (“Pew Initiative”). Even...

Words: 3833 - Pages: 16

Premium Essay

Gmo Research Paper2

...GMOs also have adverse effects on animals, the environment and the health of the consumer. In order to understand why GMOs have these effects, it is important to know exactly what a GMO is and how these differ from the normal breeding farmers have done for years. The Free Dictionary defines a GMO as “An organism whose genetic characteristics have been altered using the techniques of genetic engineering.” It goes on to explain that modern science has the ability to modify the genetic makeup of plants and animals. Scientists can even transfer genes from one species to another. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/genetically+modified+organism Advocates of genetically modified organisms say that the use of the gmos could end world hunger they also say we could create plants and animals that are resistant to disease and tolerant to pesticides. They can also engineer plants to be drought resistant. They argue these changes would stop famine because the plants could naturally resist. The proponents use pathos to convince people they have the answer to world hunger. They show you pictures starving people around the world and tell you their “improved” seeds make hunger go away. Perhaps it could but the studies do not prove that yet. In fact, the only feeding study done with humans showed that GMOs survived inside the stomach of the people eating GMO food. This does not mean it is safe for our consumption. No other follow-up studies were done to determine the long term effects on humans...

Words: 2243 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Genetically Modified Organism

...Questions and Considerations Psychological Affects Moral and Ethical Implication Conclusion Works Cited Appendix Abstract Introduction The Hunger Games trilogy dwells upon genetic modification. With genetically engineered animals such as the jabberjay, mockingjay, tracker jacker and wolf mutts, monkey mutts and even genetically engineered roses, the trilogy explores the ethics and consequences of toying with Nature. This paper will discuss the pros and cons of genetically modified organisms. Also the economic, psychological effect on society as well as the moral and ethical implications that this technology can have on today’s society. History Genetically modified organisms have continually been around but have recently evolved and came to light in the past 10 years. Genetically modified organisms are described as “An organism whose genetic characteristics have been altered by the insertion of a modified gene or a gene from another organism using the techniques of genetic engineering (www.medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com, 2013).” genetically modified organism (GMO) is used to refer to any microorganism, plant, or animal in which genetic engineering techniques have been used to introduce, remove, or modify specific parts of its genome(www.medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com, 2013).” There is a genetic material found inside cells in molecules called (DNA), which is the "blueprint" for any living thing, such as plants, animals or the tiniest bacterium...

Words: 2687 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Genetically Modified Organisms

...Aspect of GMO by Chad Dookie Description of GMOs and the associated science Most of the populations that do shopping in the groceries to buy food for their family are not aware of the “naturalness” of the food. Groceries sell items such as; cotton seeds, rice, soy, sugar beets, yeast, cassava, papaya, bananas, food flavoring, potatoes, corn, tomatoes, squash, oils, beef, pork, chicken, salmon, peas, alfalfa, and honey. Notice that most of the items listed either came from a plant or an animal. Those are the top 20 grocery items that have been genetically modified. What are genetically modified organisms? A genetically modified organism is any living thing that has had their DNA tampered with. This can be mutating, removing, or adding genetic material into the organism. All of the items listed in paragraph one has had their DNA tampered with. Most times when people talk about genetically modified organisms, they mostly refer to plants that are genetically modified. You may be wondering how the animals listed are considered genetically modified. This is because scientists modify the plants that are being fed to the animals. This causes the DNA in the animals to also get tampered with. There are ways, for example, to feed chicken so that they are stronger and they get more meat in them. The way to do this is to modify the foods they eat and put something in the plant’s DNA to make these chickens stronger. Scientists can also directly modify the DNA of the animal also, instead of...

Words: 9591 - Pages: 39

Premium Essay

Genetically Modified Foods - Persuasive Essay

...foods) or genetically modified foods, what will you consume? After reading this document, you will think twice before consuming food containing ingredients that are not familiar to you. Genetically Modified Foods; Choosing Organic Choose the Best Farmers are the main source of food production within the US, as the country’s population begins to grow; a concern arises. Will the farmers be able to produce enough food to feed all the mouths? According to Monsanto (producer of genetically modified seeds) and biotech food scientists’ the answer is no. As scientist research and move genes from one organism to another, they develop GMOs. The resulted product, GMO seed, are being introduced to farmers as a crop enhancer and pesticide to accommodate the rapidly growing countries need for a larger food supply. Modern genetic engineering is the ability to identify and splice genes from one kind of organism into the DNA of another. Modern genetic engineering as altered agriculture forever. Splicing and cross-pollinating have been and currently are the two most commonly used methods when growing GMO filled crops. Ingesting the genetically altered foods versus the all-natural foods (containing no built in pesticides) is a choice we, as a country, should not have to make. GMOs Genetically modified...

Words: 1090 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Genetically Modified Organism

...world continues to increase, it will be accompanied by an increase in the demand for food. Food is one of the most vital needs of the world we live in. In the old days, ancient people kill for food to survive. Today, some people mark it as piece of extravagance and whatnots. Food feeds our hunger and in turn, gives energy for the daily activities we humans need to do in order to get through the day. Also, it forms connection within another human being for it is shared along the dinner table and have food as the topic of the night. Basically, food is the demand and supply which runs the world: be it in the developed country where food is made even luxury and be it in the developing country where food is seen as a staple for survival. Since the total acreage planted is no longer increasing, unless new production technology is adopted, such an increase in demand that is unmatched by an increase in supply in the world food market will raise food prices and lead to food shortages, especially in underdeveloped countries. At the same time, many people are troubled by the idea of messing with nature, and say they don’t want their meals turned into “frankenfoods.” They are worried that taking genetic material from one organism and putting it in another could not only unhinge the ecosystem, but threaten people’s health, including...

Words: 2676 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

‘Gm Food Advances the Goal of Sustainable Development.’ to What Extent Do You Think This Is True?

...allowed the world to cope with agriculture and an increasing population, however the FAO expects a long term decrease in food production in rich countries (Alexandratos 1988). 800 million people are affected today by hunger and malnutrition(Food Future 2000). The FAO claims that 650 million of these people will still be in the same situation by 2010. The world produces enough food, often it is the distribution process that causes problems. However this food may be produced in a non sustainable way. Pesticides, use of non farming land and the demand for cash crops over self sufficiency are not necessarily in the environments best interest. Factors such as poverty, wealth and inequality place burdens on the environment and possible sustainability. Genetically modified foods could be a key factor in advancing the goal of sustainable development. Biotechnology is the use of biological science to alter living organisms for the benefit of mankind. Every organism carries a set of instructions telling it how to grow and reproduce in its genes. Genetic engineering is deliberately changing a plants make up giving the organism new features by removing or copying selected genes with the aim of improving the plant and introducing more beneficial traits. Often the genetic material inserted is alien to the receiving plant. It can result in cross...

Words: 4659 - Pages: 19

Free Essay

Director

...of GM crops bringing the second green revolution and the answer to African hunger, but a closer look makes it clear that GM crops have no place in African agriculture. The push to bring genetically modified (GM) crops into African agriculture is not letting up, even as (and partly because) the GM industry is faltering in much of the world. A growing list of organizations, networks and lobby groups with close ties to the GM industry are working to promote GM agriculture on the continent. GM crops are so far only commercially available in South Africa, but there have been field trials in Kenya, Egypt and Burkina Faso, and also in Senegal and Zimbabwe where there was no public knowledge or regulatory oversight. At least12 African countries are carrying out research on GM crops, including Egypt, Uganda, Morocco, Nigeria, Tunisia and Cameroon, and a long list of GM crops are in the pipeline for introduction in various African countries (see map). There's also concern that GM crops are coming in by way of food imports and seed smuggling, even for countries that have taken measures to prevent imports of GM food, such as Zambia, Angola, Sudan, and Benin. In short, Africa is in danger of becoming the dumping ground for the struggling GM industry and the laboratory for frustrated GM scientists. The proponents of GM technology sell a sweet message of GM crops as the second green revolution and the answer to African hunger, but the reality is quite different. A close look at GM crops...

Words: 1906 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

To What Extent Can Global Food Production Meet the Demands of Today and Tomorrow Whilst Remaining Sustainable and Ethical

...To what extent can global food production meet the demands of today and tomorrow whilst remaining sustainable and ethical? In the first half of this century, agriculture will have to face several challenges. Currently food production can meet the whole worlds population needs, except it is not distributed fairly. World population is expected to soar by 34% to reach 9.1 billion by 2050, with the entire 2.3 billion rises to take place in the developing countries. Furthermore, not only will population growth take place entirely in developing countries but also it will occur mostly in urban areas that will swell by 86% or nearly 3 billion people while rural populations shrink by 18%. The combined effect of population growth, high-income growth and urbanization, with the shifts in diet structures towards more nutritious and higher quality foods, is expected to result in almost the doubling of demand for food, feed and fibre. There could be a few solutions for these issues, but the question is asked if they are both sustainable and ethical. Because of this increase in demand, natural resources such as land, water and biodiversity, will become more and more scarce because of increasing pressures. This means that a smaller rural workforce will have to produce more and better from fewer resources to meet future demand. In addition to the growing resource scarcity, global agriculture will have to cope with the effects of climate change, notably higher temperatures, greater rainfall variability...

Words: 954 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Environmental Issues – Genetically Engineered Products

...One of the most powerful and argumentative question today is if genetically altered food really the answer to stop global hunger. We ask this question with one purpose in mind and that’s finally a way to feed desperate and starving people in our world. Who would say no to that? According to many researchers however, this may just be on every level a deception. For over a decade, GE or genetically modified crops have been in popular demand. But with every new innovation, there is always a downfall, and that’s GE foods are not only harmful but are on some levels unethical as well. This paper will discuss both positive and negatives points on bringing an end to global hunger, and the impact it will cause our planet. GE crops can range from many different assortments of plants such as rice, soybeans, corn, cottonseeds. GE crops are mainly used for human and animal consumption. Farmers tend to use more GE crops than ever today, because of global hunger, the demand in GE products are at an all-time high. GE altered crops plays a major role in our future. (Mercola, 2011) We have already seen them in our grocery stores and our kitchen. As of 2010, 85% of our corn crops our genetically engineered, 91% of our soybeans, and 88% of cotton. Our government has stated even 95% of sugar beets are genetically enerineered. It has been estimated that over 70% of our food in our stores are genetically engineered; anything from crackers, soups, sodas, and even our condiments. Genetically engineered...

Words: 2687 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Muscle Binds

...Unit 1 VOCABULARY Text Muscle Binds (p. 3) virtue (n.), virtuous (adj.) to involve smb. in smth., be involved in/with, involvement (n.), involvement with/in strenuous (adj.) smugness (n.), smug (adj.) superiority (n.), superiority complex, superior (adj.), superior to smb. (opposite) inferiority (n.), inferiority complex., inferior (adj.), inferior to smb. lure (v), lure (n) eternity (n.), eternal (adj.) cripple (v.), cripple (n.) flourish (v.) humiliate (v.), humiliation (n.) fad (n.), passing fad drag (n.), real drag charity (n.), charitable (adj.) mortal (n., adj.) obsess (v.), be obsessed by/with smth. obsession (n.), obsession with smth terms (plural) in practical/political/economic terms, in terms of time/money/efforts Word Combinations to result from smth to result in smth apart from Expressions with “come” (p.7) Idiomatic expressions (p.8) Physical complains (p.18) Text How are your genes? (p. 19) span (n.), life span determine (v.), genetically/culturally/biologically determined, to determine + whether/why/who/what Text of the sample composition (p.30) benefit (v.), to benefit from, benefit (n.), to reap/receive benefit from, beneficial (adj.) test-tube (n.), test-tube baby controversy (n.), to create/cause/spark/stir controversy, controversial (adj.) affect (v.) hostility (n.), hostile (adj.) interfere (v.), interfere in/with abuse (v.), abuse (n.) ban (v.), ban (n.), ban on smth. One Man’s Meat is Another Man’s...

Words: 9264 - Pages: 38

Premium Essay

Gmo & Disease

...needs of society. For example, the use of cross breeding in fruits and vegetables to make them stronger, breeding live stock to fit human needs, and pasteurization of milk to protect against harmful bacteria. Is GMO really any different from these techniques? The biggest difference is that the genes of the plants and animals are being altered. The use of rDNA has been shown to be unpredictable, each generation could have traits that may or may not differ from the intended traits. So the question is “are GMO foods healthy or not?” I don't know if there can be a direct answer to this question. Research shows that the use of RBGH can increase the presence of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) in humans. IGF-1 in large doses can cause illness and disease such as headache, and hypoglycemia. Overdose of IGF-1 can cause Hypoglycemia, edema, and Hyperandrogenism. Other side effects of IGF-1 are Increase hunger, and Weight gain, and IGF-1 has also been linked to breast, colon, and prostate cancer. However, in the rite doses IGF-1 can treat disease such as type 1 and 2 diabetes, kidney disease, and Alzheimer’s disease. It plays a key role in homeostasis and could be used to treat heart disease and improve bone mass. The FDA has said that there is not enough IGF-1 in milk to be of concern. The studies that have been done point to both positive and negative aspects of IGF-1,...

Words: 1027 - Pages: 5