Free Essay

Genocide

In: Historical Events

Submitted By Prowrite
Words 3101
Pages 13
Genocide Foundations
Name
Institution Affiliation
Date

Genocide Foundations

Introduction

Over the years, genocide studies receive positive and negative influences from both the cultural and political contexts. The two contexts have extensively influenced the view of genocide. The major view of genocide is that it is a domestic occurrence of states. On a literal perspective, various authors have contributed to the subject of genocide. The assignment looks to extensively explore the foundations of genocide based on book reviews. The paper will provide an in-depth analysis and reviews of three books on genocide, What is Genocide by Martin Shaw, Centuries of Genocide by Totten and On the nature of genocidal intent by Campbell.

Shaw, M. (2007). What is Genocide? Cambridge: Polity Press. ISBN: 0745631827.

Martin Shaw’s takes up the subject of defining genocide in all contexts. Through the book, What is Genocide, Shaw seeks to address two major issues related to genocide definition.

• Unchanging definition of genocide

• Reasons and need for changing definition of genocide

Modern comprehension of the genocide ideology arises from a historical and contemporary viewpoint. It is evident over the years that the definition of genocide has undergone minimal change. In the book, the author offers key reasons for the unchanging definition of genocide while at the same time offering major reasons for the need to make the necessary changes (Shaw, 2007). Different reasons contribute to the unchanging definition of genocide. In the past years, people paid minimal attention to the criminological and sociological aspects of the crime of genocide. For instance, the legal aspect working on the definition of genocide did not consider the major reasons contributing to the occurrence of genocide. The legalists working on the legal definition of genocide failed to consider genocide motives as elements of the crime. In the recent times, social scientists seek to incorporate the limiting acts of genocide in the definition of the crime.

Shaw (2007), highlights the fact that unprotected groups were left out of the genocide definition. In this regard, modern comprehension of genocide lacks various aspects in its definition to make it comprehensive. Some of the perspectives include political and social scientists that strive to include ideologies from the minority groups. Initially, genocide was defined as crimes against humanity. However, over years, crimes against humanity ranges to include aspects such as widespread and systematic crimes against all civilians. Shaw explains in the book that the definition of genocide as defined by the Convention has remained untouched since 1948 (Shaw, 2007). It is therefore, important that contemporary parties incorporate new meaning and understanding of genocide.

History is full of human violence against each other. The mid-twentieth century gave birth to the academia and human rights activist spheres with a new concept of human destructive behavior termed as genocide. Shaw explains that various episodes of genocide have occurred in the world with the earliest genocide being witnessed in 1915. The latest one being in 1994. According to the author, the occurrence of the genocides is quite alarming as the numbers are too high. For this reason, the subject of genocide has caught attention of different people and institutions including human rights activists, academicians, and social scientists (Shaw, 2007). Despite the rising interest in the subject, there has never been a standard definition of genocide. The aim of social scientists in engaging in the definition of genocide is to relate the moral barbarity of such crimes and better place them within the larger communal context in which it is felt they belong. Shaw’s in-depth analysis of the social science aspect of genocide implies that their definition aims to be more comprehensive and preemptive in their formulations.

The author presents the key aspects of the 1948 Convention definition of the term genocide. Genocide is an act committed with intent to ruin a national, ethnical, religious or racial group. Despite the definition trying to encompass every aspect, there have been a major criticism of the definition as most groups find it vague and with varied shortcomings. The definition relates to several unrelated situations. Shaw cites one example relating to the definition as the one-child policy in China which is considered genocidal as it limits the population growth of particular segments of the nation’s ethnic affiliations. Scholars reject major aspects of the UN Convention 1948 definition (Shaw, 2007). Shaw explains that the definition excludes the “annihilation of groups defined by other characteristics such as class or political affiliation”.

Chapter One – The Origins of Genocide

The chapter focuses on the origins of genocide, with key emphasis on the global-historical ideology. The author uses the chapter to offer a sense of genocide’s frequency over the years. The chapter examines the derivation and progression of the theory, unravels some central speculative deliberations, and explores debated cases which explore the confines of the genocide background. In order to understand the meaning and definition of genocide, it is important that the readers have knowledge of genocide in prehistory, early modernity and antiquity (Shaw, (2007).

The term “genocide” is quite new but the ideology is ancient. The chapter quotes the bible to indicate the different aspects of the origin of genocide. The main aim of genocide in the past years was to eradicate enemy ethnicities and to incorporate and exploit other members. In ancient times, the genocides spare young women and girls for the sake of procreation and a source of dominant offspring. This was a typical trait in the ancient times as the gender-selective mass killing and root and branch genocide took over the past genocides. According to the chapter, the first recorded genocide was the Roman siege. In the siege, over 150,000 people were killed in Rome. Understanding the aspects of genocide, the chapter explores two different cases classified as genocide, one in Europe and the other in Africa. The two case studies indicate the times and geographical aspects of genocide and its effects. The chapter delves into details of the Vendee uprising in which over 150,000 people died while the Zulu genocide was responsible for displacement and murder of thousands of people (Shaw, 2007).

Prior to 1948, genocide was a crime without a name and until the Second World War, the naming process was yet to kick off. Raphael Lemkin was the founder of genocide studies and played a key role in the naming of the term/crime “genocide”. After the Lemkin era, the UN Convention in 1948 takes over in an effort to name genocide. Contemporary times focus on the genocidal intent, which may influence future definitions of the crime. The chapter also explains major contested cases of genocide. One notable contested case is the viewpoint in which terrorism should take. The key question is whether terrorism should be categorized as genocide regarding the intent, circumstance, and consequences of the act. The author finalizes with the debate of justifying genocide. All these aspects majorly rely on the intent of the act.

Chapter Eight; Genocidaires

In this chapter, Shaw outstandingly tries to reconcile the sociological factor that is often involved in the mind of those with the intention to commit the crime. These people rarely own up to the fact that they are killing people (Shaw, 2007). In essence, they refer to their victims in inhuman terms such as insects. The ideology behind this denial is to motivate their actions of mass murder. In the chapter, the author also highlights the acknowledgement of the killers through their crude ways of killing civilians.

Totten, S. (2012). Centuries of Genocide: Essays and Eyewitness Accounts. Routledge.

The fourth edition of Centuries of Genocide: Essays and Eyewitness Accounts, has major focus on the different examples of genocides committed in the 19th, 20th and 21st centuries. The book contains various chapters, each written by acknowledged expert in the given field. The chapters collectively depict a wide range of disciplinary viewpoints. The key backbone of the book is in the introduction part which offers readers with definitional issues, promises, convolutions and obstructions to the prevention and intervention of genocide. The book consists of various genocide accounts from people and institutions who witnessed the crime first hand. These accounts are from various parts of the world, and the diversity of the accounts allows readers to fully comprehend the genocide issue in the world. The witnesses’ genocide accounts also help readers to understand more about the similarities and differences of the different genocidal crimes (Totten, 2012). To achieve this understanding, the author structures the accounts through leading questions. These questions help the witnesses to address similar issues of their different genocide which in turn provide the readers with deep understanding of every genocide witnessed in the world.

Reading through every chapter of Centuries of Genocide: essays and Eyewitness Accounts, it is noticeable of the standard questions posed to every witness of different genocides. The particular leading questions include; who committed the genocide, how the act was committed, reasons behind the occurrence of the genocide, the main victims of the crime, and the outstanding historical forces in relation to the genocide (Totten, 2012). In addition, the author questions the witnesses on the long-range consequences of the genocide, the responses received during and after the genocide, future interpretation by scholars, and the contribution of the genocide to the relevant field of study. The book aims to provoke readers to the understanding that learning about genocide is significant and that every individual has an obligation not to become immune to acts of genocide, particularly in the contemporary world. The eyewitness accounts give major back up to the information provided in the book. The edition includes few revisions of the chapters including new chapter authors on Herero genocide and Rwanda genocide.

Centuries of Genocide offers readers a platform to learn in measured but no less wrenching tones of the deliberate annihilation of the different aspects of genocide committed in Indonesia, Rwanda, Armenia, Burundi, Kosovo, Darfur, Cambodia, Bangladesh, Iraqi-Kurdistan, and many other areas highlighted in the eighteen essays (Totten, 2012). The author dedicates three chapters to explore the perspectives of the European Holocaust which witnessed the death of over 44 million people. It is evident that the essays differ in detail, tone, and range. However, despite the difference in time, geographical location, and other factors, the author brings about major similarities through the standard questions. The essays are similar as they provide readers with background information, the ethos, response or lack thereof from the persons and institutions responsible.

The introductory statement in the book “ Will the killing ever stop?” is a profound question which allows the readers to ponder over the impacts of genocide. The introduction by the author integrates the ideas and concepts developed in the foreword and continues to set out the parameters for the discussion in the rest of the book. The first parts of every chapter in the book provide the context for the genocide followed by the second part which includes a compilation of eyewitness explanations relating to the particular genocide under discussion. The fourth edition of the book also offers maps to locate the various regions where the atrocities were committed. Reading the seventeen essays and the introduction part, it is evident that the book aims to portray the key issues witnessed in different genocides (Totten, 2012). The book revolves around the struggle to bring about significant and profound worldwide change in fighting to the scourge of genocide in contemporary times. The inclusion of eyewitness accounts from different parts of the world is an indication that the atrocity can occur anywhere and to anyone at any time. Few governmental forces have been able to limit the occurrence of genocide with a perfect example being of the Darfur situation. The genocide cited in Darfur is still ongoing even in the 21st century, hence, genocidal acts are not ancient.

Chapter Ten – The Burundi Genocide

The chapter focuses on the first recorded case of genocide in the Great Lakes Region of Africa which led to the death of over 300,000 Hutu. The genocide occurred in 1972, which attracted minimal media attention. Notable, there were no efforts by the reigning governments to carry out investigations on the reasons behind the occurrence of the atrocity (Totten, 2012). Over the years, there have been cases of blame game between the two communities, Hutus and Tutsis. The following areas of the chapter needs emphasis.

– The historical and regional context of the Burundi genocide

– The road to mass murder

– The silence of the international community

– The aftermath

– Eyewitness Accounts: The Burundi Genocide

It is seeming that the Burundi 1972 killings intended to crush the insurrection. The reigning government orchestrated the atrocity with the intention to insure the long-term stability of the state. The only reasonable way to maintain this control was through the elimination of the all educated Hutu elites and potential elites. Another motivating factor is the need for the government to transform the instruments of force including the police, army to a monopolistic aspect of rule. The 1972 Burundi genocide drastically altered the nation’s ethnic frame. Subsequent years have witnessed the stern lines of the Hutu-Tutsi fault line to extreme aspects. It is apparent that the 1972 genocide majorly contributed towards the 1994 Rwanda genocide as the two communities strive to claim prominence in the regions (Totten, 2012).

Chapter Seventeen: The intervention and prevention of Genocide-Where there is the political will, there is a way.

The last chapter of the book seeks to make sense of the genocide and its consequences. Despite the regular mass killing of innocent people in the whole world, there have been minimal initiatives to prevent further occurrence. The author provides different ways to intervene and prevent the occurrence of genocide. According to the research carried out by the experts on genocide, Totten recommends the establishment of proper and efficient systems which will help prevent the occurrence of genocide (Totten, 2012). One notable approach presented in the chapter is detecting an actual case of genocide early enough to put stringent measures. From the discussed cases of genocides in the book, some of them would have been avoided had the relevant authorities been keen on the early signs.

Campbell, J. J. (2012). On the Nature of Genocidal Intent. Lexington Books.

Over the years, the subject of genocide has received key attention from different scholars. One major aspect is the intention behind most genocides in the world. In this regard, Jason Campbell takes up the subject in his book, On the Nature of Genocidal Intent. The author provides a hypothetical insight into the nature of genocidal intent, analytically examining the theoretical and coherent structures for genocidal intent, and discussing its conjectural foundations. The in-depth exploration provides specific insight into the process of operationalizing genocide and mass extermination (Campbell, 2012). The examination comprises of analysis of the obligations orchestrators play and the systematic development of a genocidal strategy. This requires the intent to purge pre-selected demographic identifiers from the population.

The author also discusses in detail the vigorous process of generational struggle, wherein former offenders become victims and victims become perpetrators (Campbell, 2012). The 1948 UN Convention worked on the definition of genocide. It is apparent that the connotation of genocide and its consequence both legally and socially, relies keenly on the ideology of intent. However, further discussion of the subject has been rigid, not allowing contribution from social scientists. The major reason for the making of the book is to allow other members of the community to make contributions towards the genocide subject. The major way for this contribution is through the understanding of genocidal intent. In the introduction part of the book, Campbell tries to uncover the relationship between “the intent to kill and the intended result” which is an act of genocide (Campbell, 2012). The UN Convention explores the intent within the boundaries of genocide. The deeper people understand about genocidal intent, the more the comprehension of the nature and preconditions required to satisfy an act of genocide. The author highlights the need of understanding the relationship between the act and the intent behind the act. According to the UN Convention, the definition and its details lacks a chance for finding the relationship between the intent and the act of genocide. In the introduction part of the book, Campbell offers eight definitional perceptions of genocidal intent. Prior to understanding of the genocidal intent, the author explores the criteria for the selection of direct or indirect genocidal force. In terms of direct genocidal force, the use of government authorized and sanctioned military forces to commit an act of genocide. In the case of indirect genocidal force is where the perpetrators of genocide use paramilitary or militia groups to commit the act of genocide (Campbell, 2012).

Chapter Three – Genocidal Intent and its Relationship to Consequences

In this chapter, Campbell brings out the existing relationship between the genocidal intent and the consequences of the act of genocide. The impact of genocide are detrimental with the major one being murder of innocent lives. For such atrocities to pass as genocide, the act involves the loss of lives. In most cases, the number of deaths run into thousands. Various genocide acts indicate different intent, depending on the forces behind the atrocity. For instance, the Burundi 1972 genocide occurred from the direct force where the government intended to remain in power. The consequences witnessed after any genocide may clearly portray the genocidal intent. The people succumbing to the act, the destruction of property, and people affected in terms of future arrests will indicate the genocidal intent. The recommendation of the author in the chapter is for the relevant organizations and authorities to identify genocidal intent before any major consequences and damages (Campbell, 2012).

Chapter Eight: Inconsistencies within the logic of genocidal intent

The last chapter of the book tries to explore the existing inconsistencies within the logic of genocidal intent. Despite the constant calls in the modern times to understand the nature of genocidal intent, the criteria employed in the process leaves room for inconsistencies. The reported cases of genocide vary at lengths, from the geographical locations to the time of occurrence. In this regard, it is difficult to reach a standard way in which various relevant authorities can use to figure out the genocidal intent (Campbell, 2012). Notable, different genocides occur under varied circumstances hence the inconsistencies. On the other hand, the pre-genocide factors may lead to major inconsistencies.

References

Campbell, J. J. (2012). On the Nature of Genocidal Intent. Lexington Books.

Shaw, M. (2007). What is Genocide? Cambridge: Polity Press. ISBN: 0745631827.

Totten, S. (2012). Centuries of Genocide: Essays and Eyewitness Accounts. Routledge.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Genocide

...Essay Genocide Genocide was the term that came out after the Nazi’s Holocaust of World War Two, but it was not the first incident of Genocide, or the last. During the Genocide Convention that followed World War Two it was agreed amongst the world leaders that genocide would “never again” occur in the world. Time has shown that this might have been an empty promise however, and this essay will review the laws being implemented by the United Nations to help prevent genocide, arguments about why humans kill, incidents of genocide and how genocide is defined and, of course, the victims of the violent crime known as genocide. Genocide is now defined in the Oxford English Dictionary as “[t]he deliberate and systematic extermination of an ethnic or national group”. The United Nations created a much broader and in depth definition in the Genocide Convention of 1948. They state that genocide is “…any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or part, a national, ethnical or religious group, as such: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or part; imposing measures to prevent births within the group; forcibly transferring children of the group to another group”. Despite some flaws and loopholes in this definition, it covers the atrocities that occur during genocide quite well. Genocide has occurred...

Words: 1454 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Genocide

...Jose Rivers Genocide Reflection First, what is a genocide? According to the Article II of the United States Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide is “any of the following acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life, calculate to bring about its physical destruction in whole or on part; imposing measures intended to prevent birth within the group; forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.” In other words, genocide is when a group attempts to destroy or hurt mentally or physically a minority. The perfect example for a genocide is the Holocaust. Hitler and his followers wanted to get rid of “imperfect” people such as, Jews, homosexuals, Gypsies, disabled, Jehovah’s Witnesses, and anyone that he considered racially inferior. I believe in equality. We are all considered human beings and that massacre is against all morals. Hitler was just like any other human; he shouldn’t have had the power to decide who should live, or not. The Holocaust was a tragedy which we shall all remember around the world. Remember those innocent people killed by one person’s false belief. There are some situations going on now that the United Nations consider to be genocides. For example, the Darfur Genocide. This must stop...

Words: 281 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Genocide

...Genocide Name: Course: Tutor: Date: Introduction The term genocide refers to the mass murder of a specific race or tribe or group of people with the sole intention of eliminating the said group. As the world came to realize with the discrimination of Jews by the Nazi forces, genocide does not sit on the same bench as other crimes such as burglary. The spirited effort towards the elimination of a single race or tribe is the driving force of this heinous crime. It is said “power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely”. At the centre of genocide, power and resources are usually the propagators of this vice. In a state in which the availability and distribution of resources is anything short of equal, negative ethnic traits such as tribalism, nepotism and even clanism, in other cases, can easily result in the onset of genocide. Greed is also a consistent feature of many genocide-stricken states. The more worrying issue, apart from the killing of millions of innocent civilians, is the prejudice with which many of the leaders of these factions plan and coordinate these atrocities. The notion that leaders are well above the law is characteristic of states that have felt the iron grip of genocide. The case of Darfur is one of the most disheartening. Darfur has been embroiled in the throes of genocide for the better part of the 21st Century. Having been the first genocide of the 21st Century, the mention of Darfur does not resonate well on the global landscape. Upon...

Words: 2199 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Genocide

...Final Paper Genocide Wade Harris HIS306: Twentieth-Century Europe Instructor: Fara Driver November 2nd, 2015 If anything could be described as a scar on the face of the twentieth century genocide would be that scar. Genocide is not the invention of those in the twentieth century, but rather the epitome, the refinement of a horrific act that the twentieth century has perfected. An act that has popular support and the backing of governments, so how can people who live side by side peacefully with others for so long suddenly flip and be able to kill their neighbors? Genocide is a series of choices, choices made by leaders to begin the killings, choices made by people to participate, and the choice to see something wrong and having the power to stop it, but choose not to. Many have written that it is deep seeded hatred passed on from generation to generation that always sits in the back of the minds of those committing genocide, things that may or may not have happened. Other scholars write that it is cultural differences that are ignored until a leader or group uses them for their own gain. (Churchill, R. P. 2014) Whatever the reasons, it is always the minority on the losing end, the bully mentality of a few whirling up hatred for someone else until everyone is in a frenzy and the rhetoric seems real, the threat conjured up is real, and the only action to keep things safe and secure is to remove the problem by any means. This is how genocide starts. But...

Words: 2605 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Genocide In Darfur

...Genocide is the deliberate killing of a large group of people, especially those of a particular ethnic group or nation. One of the most commonly referred to and widely known genocide is the Holocaust, but this is not the only genocide. There are many different genocides that have gone on throughout the course of history, all of which could have been prevented. One of these is a 21st century genocide going on in the Sudanese region to this day. This paper will describe the genocide in Darfur, compare it to the Holocaust and discuss not only how it can be ended but how future genocides can be prevented. 6 million citizens reside in Darfur is a region in western Sudan that was created in 1956 (“Darfur Genocide”). There has been distrust between...

Words: 1098 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Darfur Genocide

...still occurring today. Many of the minority tribes have been forced into refugee camps and left to starve and die. Many others have seen their houses and lives burned to ashes or they have watched family and friends being killed by the Sudanese military. Amnesty International USA has reported that so far, 400,000 men, women, and children have been killed and 2.6 million have been left without a home.  So how much is too much?  At what point will we stand up and stop this genocide? After 500,000 have lost their lives?  600.000? 700,000?  Has the world not learned from the tragedies that happened in Rwanda just over a decade ago?   There is debate over whether Darfur is considered Genocide or a civil war. This is a crucial question, as this will affect the way other countries will react to the situation. Another country does not want to choose sides in a civil war in fear that it will only magnify the situation. They do not want to make it seem like a invasion to reform the country. However in the case of genocide...

Words: 909 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Genocide

...Author/Editor Title Stanton, Gregory "The 8 Stages of H. Genocide" Title of Website Site Publisher Genocide Watch Genocide Watch Publication Date Medium Date Accessed Quoted Material 1998 Web 17 Jan 2016 DENIAL is the eighth The final stage of genocide, stage that always follows denial, is a coordinated a genocide. It is among effort by the perpetrators the surest indicators of to ensure that their is no further genocidal evidence or witness to their massacres. The crimes. perpetrators of genocide dig up the mass graves, burn the bodies, try to cover up the evidence and intimidate the witnesses. They deny that they committed any crimes, and often blame what happened on the victims. They block investigations of the crimes, and continue to govern until driven from power by force, when they flee into exile. Summarized Material Paraphrased Material In the final stage of genocide, denial, the perpetrators bury or burn their victimes, cover up the evidence and silence the witnesses. There is denial and victim-blaming, as the perpetrators work to avoid investigation so they can either remain in power or go into hiding. Commentary / Notes Questions / Comments for teacher Topic Sub-topics --> stages final stage cover up investigation Author/Editor Title Title of Website Site Publisher Publication Date Medium Date Accessed Quoted Material Summarized Material ...

Words: 313 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Genocide In Sudan

...Genocide To call something genocide is controversial because genocide is the deliberate killing off of a particular ethnic group or nation. Although the human race classifies the killing in Sudan a civil war. It actually should be classified as a genocide. The human race has classified killings in Darfur, Sudan as a civil war between the Arabic shepherds, and the African farmers. People believe it is a war over land, and whom should get the profit from the Sudan oil port. It all started because the “ Arabs from the north migrated down south because years of drought destroyed their northern fertile land.” Another reason people believe that the killings in Darfur are classified as a civil war because the islamic government...

Words: 391 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Examples Of Genocide

...The Holocaust What is Genocide? Ushmm.org says genocide is a term used to describe violence against members of a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group with the intent to destroy the entire group. In 1944, a Polish-Jewish lawyer named Raphael Lemkin (1900-1959) sought to describe Nazi policies of systematic murder, including the destruction of the European Jews. He formed the word "genocide" by combining geno-, from the Greek word for race or tribe, with -cide, derived from the Latin word for killing. The Holocaust is one of many examples of genocide. On January 30th, 1933 according to ushmm.org, the Jewish population in Europe stood at nine million. Most Jews lived in the areas the Nazi’s would later occupy during World War II. In 1945, The Germans and collaborators had killed two of three...

Words: 754 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

What Is Genocide

...Dante Powell 1st Paper January 27, 2014 History 231 - Genocide Dr. Thomas Porter “What is Genocide?” The term genocide has been one of the most used terms in many on-going debates since the early 20th century. The Holocaust, which took place during World War II, is one of the most common cases of acts of genocide and is a main reason why the term genocide exists. Other widely known cases of genocide are the Rwandan genocide and the Armenian genocide. The question, however, that many historians and those with interests in genocide ask, is exactly what is genocide? Since first being “coined” by Raphael Lemkin, there have been several different definitions of the term. It is these different versions of a description of genocide that have led people to try to figure out what the correct form of the definition should be and how we can use it to try and prevent it from happening. When considering genocide and what it is, one must define it containing three aspects. A definition of genocide must have a mode, an object, and an actor. Initially, I would describe genocide as the intended mass killing of a specific group of people by another party for a desired result. However, there are problems with this definition. This definition is vague as it does not specify a type of reason behind the action being performed. If someone is to commit genocide, there must be a particular reason why an act as violent as this should be committed. Also, the definition does not say why the...

Words: 1634 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Genocide

...glorimar c The Rwandan Genocide was the 1994 mass killing of hundreds of thousands of Rwanda's Tutsis and Hutu political moderates by the Hutu dominated government under the Hutu Power ideology. Over the course of approximately 100 days, or more, from the assassination of Juvénal Habyarimana on April 6 through mid-July, at least 500,000 people were killed, according to the estimate of Human Rights Watch.[1] Other estimates of the death toll have ranged between 500,000 and 1,000,000,[2] (a commonly quoted figure is 800,000), or as much as 20% of the total population of the country. In 1990 the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), a rebel group, composed mostly of Tutsi refugees, invaded northern Rwanda from Uganda. The Rwandan Civil War, fought between the Hutu regime, with support from Francophone nations of Africa and France itself,[3][4] and the RPF, with support from Uganda, vastly increased the ethnic tensions in the country and led to the rise of Hutu Power. As an ideology, Hutu Power asserted that the Tutsi intended to enslave Hutus and thus must be resisted at all costs. Despite continuing ethnic strife, including the displacement of large numbers of Hutu in the north by the rebels and periodic localized extermination of Tutsi to the south, pressure on the government of Juvénal Habyarimana resulted in a cease-fire in 1993 and the preliminary implementation of the Arusha Accords. The assassination of Habyarimana in April 1994 was the proximate cause of the mass...

Words: 322 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Genocide

...Introduction There is an extensive history of ethnic tension between the Hutus and Tutsis in Rwanda. The conflict and animosity between the two tribes ultimately led to the loss of over one million lives during the 1994 genocide. Michael Newdow made the following remarks concerning the cause of genocide: “People don't simply wake up one day and commit genocide. They start by setting themselves apart from others, diminishing the stature of those adhering to dissenting beliefs in small, insidious steps. They begin by saying, 'We're the righteous, and we'll tolerate those others.' And as the toleration diminishes over time, the inevitable harms are overlooked. It is for that reason that James Madison wisely wrote that 'it is proper to take alarm at the first experiment on our liberties'." (Michael Newdow 1) It is widely believed and stated that the 1994 Rwanda Genocide was started by the assassination of Hutu President Juvenal Habyarimana. However, the divide cause by the colonization and influence of Belgium can be seen as the underlying cause of genocide in Rowanda. http://www.religioustolerance.org/genocide0.htm Body When Rowanda was awarded to Belgium after World War, part of German’s territory that was never a part of the Kingodm of Rwanda, was stripped and attached to Tanganyika. This forced people to live amongst tribes they were unfamiliar with. Still, the Tutsi power structure for administering the country remained in place. The government also provided the Tutsis...

Words: 842 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The Rawandan Genocide

...many Rawandans, the genocide against the Tutsi became an integral and unforgettable part of their history. The slaughter of nearly a million people is usually associated with the medival times and one can only wonder how the Rawandan genocide could occur in our lifetime. Phillip Gourevitch’s essay “We Wish To Inform You That Tomorrow We Will Be Killed With Our Families” explores the mechanisms and motivation required for a mass genocide such as the Rawandan Genocide to occur in our lifetime. Taking the role of a journalist, Phillip Grouevitch brings the reader to ground zero of the genocide and brings awareness to the atrocities committed outside of our sheltered first world lives. Through the use of vivid imagery, objective approach, and...

Words: 534 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Genocide

...A Summary of the Rwandan Genocide Rwanda: A Brief History of the Country Rwanda’s population of more than 7 million people is divided into three ethnic groups: the Hutu (who made up roughly 85% of the population), the Tutsi (14%) and the Twa (1%). Prior to the colonial era, Tutsis generally occupied the higher strata in the social system and the Hutus the lower. However, social mobility was possible, a Hutu who acquired a large number of cattle or other wealth could be assimilated into the Tutsi group and impoverished Tutsi would be regarded as Hutu. A clan system also functioned, with the Tutsi clan known as the Nyinginya being the most powerful. Throughout the 1800s, the Nyingiya expanded their influence by conquest and by offering protection in return for tribute. Ethnic Conflict Begins The former colonial power, Germany, lost possession of Rwanda during the First World War and the territory was then placed under Belgian administration. In the late 1950’s during the great wave of decolonization, tensions increased in Rwanda. The Hutu political movement, which stood to gain from majority rule, was gaining momentum while segments of the Tutsi establishment resisted democratization and the loss of their acquired privileges. In November 1959, a violent incident sparked a Hutu uprising in which hundreds of Tutsi were killed and thousands displaced and forced to flee to neighboring countries. This marked the start of the so- called ‘Hutu Peasant Revolution’ or ‘social revolution’...

Words: 2186 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Essay On Genocide In Darfur

...In early 2003, a horrific event started; genocide in Darfur, Sudan. Genocide is the intentional killing of a mass quantity of people, usually of people of a particular ethnic group. In the following, you will see how this gruesome act was put into action. Darfur, Sudan is located in northeast Africa. Surrounding Sudan is Egypt to the north, Ethiopia and Eritrea to the east, South Sudan to the south, and Chad to the west. The Sudanese government committed the genocide. The government orchestrated the genocide because they wanted to stop the rebel groups from their up rise against the government. In February of 2003 the Darfur Liberation Front (later the Sudan Liberation Army) attacked Gulu, the capital of the district of Jebel Marra. Their second attack was on April 25, 2003. In Darfur, Sudan, two rebellious groups, the Sudanese Liberation Army and the Justice and Equality Movement, attacked the El Fasher airport....

Words: 683 - Pages: 3