Free Essay

Gnosticism

In: Religion Topics

Submitted By waltermoney1
Words 3143
Pages 13
Anna Calabrese
Ch107
December 3, 2011

The Gnostic Movement(s) and the role of Women There is current pop cultural obsession with Gnosticism. A glimpse at the documentary section of Netflix will prove this to be true. Gnosticism is often presented as a mystical and poetic alternative to the patriarchal hierarchy of the Christian Church. It is also often presented as a safer and more holistic religious home for women, free of many of the misogynistic barriers of the larger institution of the church. But how much of this is true? What is Gnosticism anyway and what does it really have to say about women? This paper will explore these questions by giving an overview of what Gnosticism really is, beyond a new shelf in the Christian self-help section at Barnes and Noble. I will explore this through two Gnostic theologians, Valentinus and Ptolemy. From there, the second section will deal with women and Gnostic thought, giving focus to the role of Mary Magdalene in the Pistis Sophia, The Gospel of Mary, and The Gospel of Phillip. In order to being this exploration of Gnosticism, it is more accurate to begin by discussing Gnosticisms, acknowledging primarily that Gnosticism was more than just one movement but a series of movements that shared a common belief in salvation through knowledge.[1] These movements, or this style of “speculative religious metaphysics”[2], pre-exist Christianity and came to have largest impact on Christianity in the 2nd and 3rd centuries. According to Jaroslav Pelikan[3], even the title Gnostic is a creation of modern scholars and has “ been applied to so wide a variety of teachers and teachings that it is in danger of losing its usefulness” (Pelikan pg 82). However, Gnosticism, used because there is no appropriate term to substitute, is still an immensely important element in order to fully understand the early Christian Movement. Pelikan states “ Gnosticism may be defined as a system which taught the cosmic redemption of the spirit through knowledge” (Pelikan pg 82). This system of knowing focused on the corruptible and “fallen” nature of the corporeal form and the redemptive nature of knowledge, not just as an intellectual endeavor, but also as spiritual redemption. Narrowing what begins to feel like the broad and esoteric field of enlightenment, McGuckin suggests that the term Gnostic be saved for “ those materials where we see the myth of light and dark” (McGuckin pg.2), that is a system in which materiality of the world is associated with the fall of man to darkness and salvation is the divine light by which the dark pall of that world is cast out. To better understand this archetypal Gnostic thought is instructive to turn to the work of Valentinus of Alexandria. Although possibly born in Egypt, Valentinus spent much of his life in Rome and worked under Pope Anicetus, where he almost became Bishop. [4] He is one of the most influential theologians of the Gnostic movement, with his pupils Ptolemy (who I will discuss at greater length later on) and Heracleon aiding in the propagation of Gnosticism throughout the ancient world. Valentinus proposed a “ distinctive doctrine of the divine reality and of its relation to the cosmos”( Pelikan, pg 85). Valentinian cosmology is somewhat complex, and originates with the notion that God is a “single, transcendent, and utterly unknowable Being” (Frend, 207). This being was generated in the Depth (or Bythos). After many, many years of silence and contemplation, this Depth emanated Silence. Then Depth and Silence together, who are representative of male and female aspects, emanated two other principles, understanding and truth. Following this creation came thirty separate beings, called Aeons, all in separate male and female pairings, including Word and Life, and Man and Church. These pairings created the world, known as Pleroma. The last Aeon created was Sophia (wisdom). Because Sophia quested to know the Unknowable being, she was plunged into darkness where she gave birth to a deformed infant, sometimes known as “the Child of Chaos” (Frend, pg 207). This child is “hostile and destructive spiritual force who makes the material world[5]” (McGuckin, pg3). The subsequent struggle between Wisdom Sophia and the Child of Chaos is responsible for the constant battle between good and evil that exists in the internal and external world of man. To save the world from this dualistic battle, Jesus Christ is sent to Sophia to separate wisdom from passion and enact salvation in the material world through ascent via saving knowledge. The debate between the Valentinan Gnostics and Orthodox Christians revolved heavily around what was perceived as the dualism of God in Gnostic thought. As Elaine Pagels[6] writes, “ the majority of Christians early condemned this view as dualistic, and identified themselves as Orthodox by confessing one God, who is both ‘ Father Almighty’ and ‘Maker of Heaven and Earth’” ( Pagels, pg 28). Bishop Irenaeus, one of the major forces behind the movement classifying Gnosticism as Heresy, stated that his major issue with Gnosticism was that is posited another god apart from God the creator. The Valentinan division of God into Aeons and the notion that the material world was created by a Demiurge characterized by chaos and destruction, was heretical to the teachings of the Old Testament. Even though many Valentinian theologians publicly stated their belief in “one god”, Bishop Irenaus claimed they were really just “ saying one thing and thinking another”. [7] And most disturbingly for Iraneus, most Orthodox Christians were not even able to differentiate between Orthodox and Gnostic thought. However, Iraneus declared that even though the views may have been similar in some ways, and despite linguistic similarities, the Gnostic’s were in fact guilty of blasphemy and ordered that they be expelled from the churches. Adding more fuel to the conflagration emerging between Valentinian Gnostics and the Orthodox Church were differences in the way the two theologies viewed the relationship between the Old and New Testaments. As Frend asks, “ was the Old Testament the prefiguration or introduction to the New, as in Hebrews 10, or was it wholly alien—the work of an inferior being or an evil archon?” ( Frend, pg. 208) Ptolemy, a disciple of Vanentinus’s is a key figure for further exploring this schism. For Ptolemy, the Old Testament was not the evil creation of a demiurge, it was just inadequate because it was not created by the “perfect God” and therefore contains “commandments alien to the nature and thought of such a God”( Frend, pg.208). For example, teachings such as “an eye for an eye”, were not in keeping with Jesus’ teachings of “turn the other cheek”. Therefore, for Ptolemy, the Old Testament is the product of an inferior, intermediate god who is ultimately unaware of the True God, or Ground of Beings existence[8] His views are representative of the kind of educated intellectuals who found a home in Gnostic theology, and his famous Letter to Flora presents common views of the time. For instance, Ptolemy sees Judaism as a precursor to Christianity and feels that Jewish observances such as fasting may still be carried out because as Frend asserts, “ the Gnostics gaze was always fixed on the spiritual, enlightened by the Savior Christ”( Frend, pg.209). The Letter to Flora is a good transition into the second section of this paper that will discuss Women and the Gnostic movement(s). The letter to Flora is unique because it is addressed to a woman. This woman is obviously educated and articulate. As Frend illustrates, the Letter to Flora makes clear that the Gnostics had a lot to offer women. Women’s role in salvation was emphasized and held up, and Mary (both Mother of God and Magdalene) figured prominently.

Part Two: Women and the Gnostics

Feminist theologian Rosemary Radford Reuther is careful to point out that because Gnosticism is representative of such a diversity of thought and movements, so too is the “Gnostic” understanding of women. Therefore, the Gnostic interpretation of women must be analyzed on a text-by-text basis. Using the role of Mary Magdalene in several Gnostic texts is a keyhole into the varied views on women espoused by the writers of the Gnostic Gospels. Reuther points out that while canonical Gnostic Gospels point to Mary Magdalene as the “disciple to the disciples”[9], by the sixth century she was commonly seen as a prostitute instead of one of the disciples closest to Jesus. Looking at the role of Mary Magdalene in the Pisits Sophia, the Gospel of Mary, and the Gospel of Phillip will provide a diverse look at the Gnostic understanding of women. The Pistis Sophia and the role of Mary Magdalene is an oft-debated topic. According to Anne Graham Brock[10], “ since the first generation of early Christians, Mary Magdalene’s role has suffered from misrepresentation and distortion through the conflation of her character with other female figure, including the penitent sinner, perhaps a prostitute, who anointed Jesus. Her role has also been diminished through the substitution of her character with less threatening or controversial characters named Mary, such as Mary the mother of Jesus”( Brock, pg 123). It is this last point, that Mary Magdalene is oft conflated with Mary the Mother of Jesus in these Gnostic texts is what I found most compelling. Identifying the Mary in the texts as the Virgin, has the effect of keeping a very real woman out of the inner circle of Jesus’ disciples. Scholars like Elizabeth Schussler Firoenza have done great work to reconstruct the role of women, especially Mary Magdalene, in these texts. However, quoting Brock, “ still, certain scholars challenge the interpretation that Mary Magdalene is the primary character in some of the most important early noncanonical texts…instead they claim this primary figure is Mary the Mother of Jesus. In doing so they remove the threat of one of the most positive and empowering women and apostolic figures of early Christianity”( Brock 124). But the question really remains, what do the texts themselves say? According to Brock, the Pistis Sophia is decidedly representing Mary Magdalene. She points to several examples from the primary text that point to this conclusion. Many times in the Pistis Sophia, especially in Chapters 1-3 of the text, Jesus differentiates between Mary Magdalene and Mary the Mother of God. When Mary is mentioned without the specific title of Mother, she is referred to by stating, “ Miriam, the blessed one, whom I will complete in all the mysteries of the height, speak openly, you are she whose heart is more directed to the kingdom of heaven than all your brothers and sisters” (1.17). Brock contends that the blessed one is a definite signifier in the text that the Mary being spoken of is indeed Mary Magdalene. Evidence of this is the fact that in another passage of the first book of Pistis Sophia, Jesus speaks to his Mother Mary about Mary Magdalene stating, “ You and the other Mary, the Blessed One” (1.59)
Burton cites other evidence that the Mary being signified by the “blessed one” is indeed Mary Magdalene. In a further passage, Jesus states, “ Excellent , Mariam, the blessed one who will inherit the whole kingdom of the light”. Directly after this, Mary the Mother of Jesus comes forward and states, “ My Lord and my Savior, command me also that I answer this discourse” (1.61). Following this, even more praise is offered to Mary Magdalene, now sharply differentiated from Mary the Mother of God. Brock contends that what this text asserts above all is that in the logic of the Pistis Sophia, a woman can be blessed for more than just her biological capabilities of bearing children and being a Mother. The Pisits Sophia, a text within the Gnostic tradition, asserts that Mary Magdalene is blessed for her pure and spiritual nature,
“ Mary the spiritual one of pure light” (3.116.118). Just as the Gnostic movement itself was really a diversity of movements, the perspective on women in many of the Gnostic texts is just as diverse. However the Gospel of Phillip is similar to the Pistis Sophia in its presentation of women as spiritually enlightened beings. Rosemary Radford Reuther explains that in the Gospel of Phillip, the Valentinian creation mythos is explicated, with attention paid to the soul-spirit split that occurred with Adam and Eve. According to Reuther, “ the division of the original androgynous Adam into male and female brought death into the world. For the community of the Gospel of Phillip, the sacrament of the ‘bridal chamber’ could remedy this primal fall into gender duality and death. In this symbolic spiritual marriage, Valentinian Gnostics believed that they reunified their male-female (psychic-spiritual) duality and thus ascended to redemptive wholeness” (Reuther, pg. 124). The Gospel of Phillip also depicts Mary Magdalene as the “female half” of Christ if you will. Jesus is presented as having a special affinity for Mary, and even that he “ kisses her many times on the mouth”. In the Gospel of Phillip, Jesus’ disciples become upset and jealous of the special attention that Jesus bestows up Mary Magdalene. The Male disciples ask “ why do you love her more than us?” Jesus answers, “ when the light comes, then he who sees will see the light, and who is blind will remain in darkness”. Jesus appears to be saying in that passage that Mary is the one who is the keeper of the light is Mary Magdalene and those who are blind or in the dark are the male disciples. According to Radford Reuther, the most significant Gnostic gospel for analyzing the role of women as embodied in Mary Magdalene is the Gospel of Mary. The gospel begins with Jesus laying out the importance of fostering inner peace over creating laws and scriptural guidelines that hinder that inner peace and spiritual inspiration. In the Gospel of Mary, it is the male disciples who are depicted as not possessing the qualities of inner peace that Jesus speaks of. The disciples fear that if they approach the preaching of the gospels with these characteristics of tranquility and peace, they will be killed. It is then that Mary comes to the disciples and assures them that the presence of the savior will be with them, protecting them. Peter also comes forward and asserts that Jesus “Loved Mary than any other woman” (5:5), asking Mary to share the special insights that Jesus entrusted her with the rest of the disciples. After sharing a vision regarding the nature of the souls ascent to heaven, the disciples challenge Mary’s teaching because they say it contradicts the teaching of the savior himself. Peter himself then challenges whether or not Jesus would have really chosen to share such a secret with the likes of a woman. Why would he share something with a woman that he would not chose to share with his main disciples, the men. One of the disciples comes forward and asserts that “ if the Savior made her worthy, who are you indeed to reject her? Surely the Savior knew her very well. That is why he loved her more than us. Rather let us put on the Perfect Man and separate as he commanded us and preach the gospel, not laying down any other rule or law beyond what the Savior said” (9:6) [11]. With this the disciples are reminded that it is not gender that constitutes “true spirit”, and that woman are equally able to experience and preach the gospel. These passages again highlights that Gnostic scriptures were often open to viewing women beyond their gender, which so often defined them within society, and seeing them as spiritual creatures of God.

Conclusion In this paper, I have attempted to give a very brief overview of some of the substance and history of the Gnostic movement(s). I hope to have explicated that the Gnostic movement is not simple and easily defined as a “spiritual” movement, quickly palatable by “new age” consumers. Instead, the Gnostics were a group ( or groups) of elite intellectuals who constructed a complex system of beliefs that often melded Jewish, Christian, and Hellenistic tradition. It is a complex system of universal understanding, a style of “speculative religious metaphysics” that gained popularity among elites and intellectuals. Consequently, Gnosticism came under the sharp knife of the Christian Church, as Church Fathers like Bishop Irenaeus declared the Gnostics heretical for teachings that complicated notions of “one god” and preached a more dualistic conception instead. However, where the role of women is concerned, the Gnostic Gospels do present the role of women as existing beyond the biological and social roles they often found themselves trapped inside. Using three Gnostic style texts, I have shown the way that Mary Magdalene is shown as a spiritually powerful leader in her own right, not merely a woman or mother. While it is difficult to separate between the fact and fiction of modern understanding of the Gnostics, it is still a rich and vibrant area of research. In order to really begin exploration of things Gnostic, it is key to acknowledge the series of movements (often contradictory) that comprise this early Christian Movement. Nonetheless, Gnosticism sheds light on the foundations of the Church and the way it has understood itself through the ages.

Works Cited
1. J.McGuckin. 2009, Gnosticism : An Initial Consideration
2. Jaroslav Pelikan, The Emergence of the Catholic Tradition (100-600), The University of Chicago Press 1971

3. W.H.C. Frend, The Rise of Christianity , Fortress Press 1984
4. Elaine Pagels, The Gnostic Gospels, Vintage Books 1979
5. J.McGuckin, Christian Gnosticism: Valentinos (fl.c. 120-165)
6. Goddesses and the Divine Feminine: A Western Religious History, Rosemary Radford Reuther , University of California Press 2005

7. Walk in the Ways of Wisdom: Essays in honor of Elizabeth Schussler Fiorenza, Trinity Press International, 2003

8. Pistis Sophia : The Gnostic Society Library, Translated with Commentary by G. R. S. Mead
London: J. M. Watkins
Published 1921
9. The Gospel of Mary Magdala: Jesus and the First Woman Apostle, Karen King, Polebridge Press, 2003

-----------------------
[1] J.McGuckin. 2009, Gnosticism : An Initial Consideration

[2] J.McGuckin. 2009

[3] Jaroslav Pelikan, The Emergence of the Catholic Tradition (100-600), The University of Chicago Press 1971
[4] W.H.C. Frend, The Rise of Christianity , Fortress Press 1984
[5] J.McGuckin, Christian Gnosticism: Valentinos (fl.c. 120-165)
[6] Elaine Pagels, The Gnostic Gospels, Vintage Books 1979
[7] Pagels, pg 32
[8] Taken from Frend as he quotes from Ptolemy Ptolemee.
[9] Goddesses and the Divine Feminine: A Western Religious History, Rosemary Radford Reuther , University of California Press 2005
[10] Walk in the Ways of Wisdom: Essays in honor of Elizabeth Schussler Fiorenza, Trinity Press International, 2003
[11] Taken from Rosemary Radford Reuther in Goddesses and the Divine Feminine : A Western Religious History

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

God In Cormac Mccarthy's Blood Meridian

...many a bloody tale of war inside it” (McCarthy 248). Cormac McCarthy’s Blood Meridian tells the story of “the kid,” who joins the Glanton party—a group of men who ruthlessly scalped Native Americans and eventually others for bounty. The atrocities committed by the Glanton party are magnified by the presence of the judge, who seems to hold a deep understanding of God and the nature of the universe. This text seems to hold some of the same beliefs as a Gnostic worldview. Gnostic sects are present in several religions with ancient roots. Gnostics believe in a dual God—the False part of God who is found in human nature’s ways, and the True part of God who is beyond human comprehension, often detached from humanity. Blood Meridian (and Gnosticism for that matter) question whether morality can exist within humanity if humanity is a partial reflection of God. In this essay, I posit that Blood Meridian takes place in a Gnostic world—the False God being represented by the judge, and the True God being represented by the narrator. In addition, I argue that morality is unable to exist in this world due the False God’s influence on humanity. From the beginning of the novel, the reader is introduced to the True God, as represented by the narrator. The reader learns that this narrator is involved, yet detached. He observes the occurrences in the novel with great detail, yet he does not pass judgment nor does he involve himself in what happens: “See the child. He is pale and......

Words: 1667 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Theology Class

...orthodox manner. But who decides what is orthodox? An appeal to tradition was of importance in challenging unorthodox interpretations of the Scripture. Tradition refers to the way the gospels we handed down from teacher to teacher. Examples of this are known in the writings of Matthew, Mark, & Luke. It is known that Matthew used Mark as a source for his writings. Luke also used Mark and possible Matthew in his writings. This is known as the synoptic gospels. Gnosticism is another issue of tradition. Gnosticism was a major threat to the Christian church because some of their teachings were very similar to the Christians. However, their belief in Salvation was significantly different. Gnostic writers wrote of a secret teaching which ensured the believer would be saved. They taught the idea that the secret knowledge was required to pass into Heaven. The Gnostic writers argued that this secret oral teaching had been passed down from the apostles in a veiled form in the Bible. In response to Gnosticism, Christian theologians began to develop a traditional method of understanding Scripture, known as a single-source theory of tradition. Irenaeus of Lyons is noted for his major writing of Against Heresies. He defended the Christian faith against the Gnostic misrepresentations and criticisms. He made it be known the truth should be possessed through the tradition of interpreting Scripture to remain faithful by succession from the apostle’s teachings. Irenaeus......

Words: 616 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Research

...How the Nag Hammadi texts discovered in Egypt reintroduced the world to Gnostic Christianity Biblical Archaeology Society Staff   •  07/01/2014 This Bible History Daily feature was originally published in March 2011. It has been updated.—Ed.   The Nag Hammadi texts were contained in 13 leather-bound volumes discovered by Egyptian farmers in 1945. Dated papyrus scraps used to strengthen the bindings of the books helped date the volumes to the mid-fourth century A.D. Photo: Institute for Antiquity and Christianity, Claremont, CA. Until the discovery of the Nag Hammadi codices in 1945, the Gnostic view of early Christianity had largely been forgotten. The teachings of Gnostic Christianity—vilified especially since they were declared heretic by orthodox Christianity in the fourth century—had been virtually erased from history by the early church fathers, their gospels banned and even burned to make room for the view of Christian theology outlined in the canonical Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. But when two peasants discovered the Nag Hammadi texts, a 13-volume library of Coptic texts hidden beneath a large boulder near the town of Nag Hammadi in upper Egypt, the world was reintroduced to this long-forgotten and much-maligned branch of early Christian thought, Gnostic Christianity, from the Greek word gnosis, “knowledge.” The Nag Hammadi codices are 13 leather-bound volumes dated to the mid-fourth century that contain an unprecedented collection of more than......

Words: 1590 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Cultral Syncretism

...We have previously discussed syncretism and its definition and meaning. However, what legacies have the differences in types of encounters and degrees of cultural change left today? If we consider syncretism within the arenas of philosophy and religion, we can see that the melding of earlier cultures has had a lasting effect, even today. As cultures recombine with one another, they often create a new blend of teaching and belief systems from the two different cultures. However, some western religious syncretism occurred in China during the mid-late 1800s, its hybrid form not only refashioned a new belief system but also coauthored a massive rebellion known as the Taiping rebellion. While Hung Hsiu-ch'üan and his cousin baptized themselves in a well and Hung Hsiu-ch'üan called himself the other son of God, they called upon (Hooker, 1996) gender equality and sobriety, absolutism in the government and hierarchy established and even in worship during the Opium wars and rebelled not only against the foreigners and the despots then arising in opposition to foreign extraterritoriality but also to the Manchu rulers they blamed for the burgeoning group of people in the poorest class. More importantly, perhaps, this syncretism combined with the numerous cultural forces and western religions in the land, became militarized and regrettably eventually took between 30-50 million lives (Hooker, 1996). Syncretism is a fascinating amalgam of different cultures that exist at various times.......

Words: 668 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Heaven vs. Hell

...Mackenzie Rice Corn REL 250 28 November 2011 Gnosticism and Marcionism vs. Christianity What and where is heaven and hell? Many Christians today can answer these questions based on the beliefs they’ve obtained through the church. Most Christians would answer that heaven is a place in the sky where an obedient person’s soul goes after they die, and hell is a place in the ground where a misbehaved soul goes. These beliefs of afterlife are often taught in Christian churches; however, these beliefs weren’t always this way. This change was important because it answered the critical question in Christianity about the Last Judgment Day. This change took place after the church had to create specific writings of the beliefs of the Christian religion to refute the popular beliefs of Gnosticism and Marcionism. The ideas about heaven and hell came out of neo-platonic philosophy, which played the major role of influence in the Christian religious cults Gnosticism and Marcionism, who then prevailed with the same ideas that were adopted by the Christian orthodox. Another importance of this change in the history of the church is that the Christian orthodox today still practices these neo-platonic ideas that were first present in the Gnosticism and Marcionism. The Christian orthodox beliefs about heaven and hell would not be the same without the Gnostic and Marcionic influences on the church. Neo-platonic philosophy about heaven and hell show up in the beliefs of Gnostics and......

Words: 2352 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Chhi 301 Paper 1

...Hunt, Philip A. CHHI 301-B04 Research Exercise 1 29 August, 2015 Plescia, Joseph. “On the Persecution of the Christians in the Roman Empire.” Latomus, T.30, Fasc. 1 (1971) 120-132. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41527858 (accessed August 25, 2015) Emperor Decius was the first emperor to formulate a plan and initiate a systematic persecution of Christianity. Decius was not necessarily focused on Christians, but on the abolishment of Christianity itself. The emperor believed Christianity threatened the Roman way of life and the religious order of the Roman state. Decius attempted to overcome the will of the Christians in all possible ways so they would renounce. This resulted in extensive trials, physical torture, moral torture, and long prison sentence. His goal was to have the Christians show allegiance to the Roman state: even in a diminutive way. Unfortunately, the policy set forth by Decius was adhered to by several more emperors, resulting in persecution escalating over fifty more years. Grafton, David D. "Mission paradigms in the Pax Americana." Currents in Theology and Mission 32.5 (2005): 348-354. http://go.galegroup.com.ezproxy.liberty.edu:2048/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA138144023&v=2.1&u=vic_liberty&it=r&p=AONE&sw=w&asid=aab99e6642abf232be6352b7a7dc83c3 (Accessed August 26, 2015) Alexander the Great began the development of implementing Greek culture into the regions of Gaul, Arabia, and the Persian Empire. Pax Romana used this......

Words: 549 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Address Heresies Chapter 8 Summary

...discuss the following: a. State the issues of heresy addressed by II Peter, Jude, and I, II, & III John. b. Elaborate on the matter of Quasi-Gnosticism in John’s writings. c. Offer a defense of the faith using Peter’s, Jude’s, and John’s arguments. 3. Reference and cite your text, New Testament Survey, Chpt. 21, and “Addressing Heresies – II Peter, Jude, and I, II, & III John” PDF Issues of heresy confronting the churches was that of doubt and error coming from the false teachings of those who professed to be leaders. The denial of the redemption of all moral standards was spreading throught the church. Peter confronts the false teachers who had infiltrated the church (2:1). The main purpose of...

Words: 1106 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Religion

...controversies severed as a backdrop for the need to answer these pressing matters. The recognition of these writings as authoritative was formalized in the Second Council of Trullan of 692, although it was nearly universally accepted in the mid 300's.1 The Biblical canon was the result of debate and research. One of the key events that influence the recognition of the canonical books was the rise of "Gnosticism” they taught and believed in an (esoteric or intuitive knowledge) is the way to salvation of the soul from the material world. They saw the material world as created through an intermediary being rather than directly by God. Typically, Gnostic systems are loosely described as being "dualistic" in nature, meaning that they had the view that the world consists of or is explicable as two fundamental entities. Hans Jonas writes: "The cardinal feature of gnostic thought is the radical dualism that governs the relation of God and world, and correspondingly that of man and world."2 Irenaeus an early church father and apologist, was a leader in the attack on Gnosticism who said that they possessed a secret oral tradition from Jesus himself. The first Council of Nicea 325 AD. This council, convoked by the Roman Emperor Constantine the Great in AD 325, was the first ecumenical worldwide conference of bishops of the Christian Church. The purpose of the council or synod was to resolve disagreements in the Church of Alexandria...

Words: 349 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Issues with Arianism and Gnosticis

...because if God is based off one’s self-knowledge, the content of Christianity changes. Theologians Karl Barth and Thomas F. Torrance raise questions concerning the understanding of the doctrine of the immanent Trinity today. Despite Barth and Torrance’s belief that theology must allow the unique nature of its object to determine what is said about the triune of God, the beliefs of Arianism and Gnosticism are wrongly evident in the thinking of some theologians in their attempts to understand the doctrine of the Trinity. Even though the Church has rejected the beliefs Arianism and Gnosticism, they still continue to threaten Christian theology. Arianism states that Christ was not truly divine, but a created being. Fourth century priest Arius believed if God is ‘one and absolute’ then Jesus, the Son, could only be considered divine in a ‘subordinate sense.’ If Arius thought of Jesus as God Himself, then he believed he was compromising God’s oneness. The Council of Nicaea condemned Arius, and declared the Son to be ‘of one substance with the Father.’ St. Irenaeus rejected the heresy of Gnosticism in the second century. The heresy states humans save themselves through knowledge that they acquire through reflection. Eventually, they discover that in some sense, they are identical twins with Jesus and no longer rely on Him for salvation. According to theologian Gordon Kaufman, the human imagination uses the image/concept of God as the ‘ultimate point of reference.’ In......

Words: 1212 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Defending Christian Truth

...truth. The Apologists were scholarly men who took on the task of composing a defense and endorsement of Christian truths. Their objective, to dispel falsehoods and misunderstandings, and to point towards Christian truth. False teachings were found inside and outside the church. Examples of heresies in the church include Marcionism, a belief that there was a creator god who was evil and a redeemer god who was good. Ebionitism taught Jesus was not the second person in the Godhead. Instead, He was the prophetic successor to Moses. Montanism believed in celibacy and prolonged fasting. It also taught obedience to the Holy Spirit through His prophet Montanus and challenged church authority. Gnosticism, Manicheanism and Neoplatonism are examples of heresies outside the church. Gnosticism and Manicheanism are closely related, teaching among other things dualism believing spirit is good, material or physical is evil. God did not create the universe. Neoplatonism is a mystical religion based on the philosophical teachings of Plato. While these errant teachings were harmful to the early church, it forced the church to examine their beliefs concerning the Godhead, the role of the Holy Spirit and the canon. The third century brought doctrinal changes. There were disputes over the characteristics of the Godhead, the nature and character of Jesus and the salvation doctrine. These disputes sometimes resulted in error. In an effort to...

Words: 430 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The Biblical Canon

...The Biblical Canon: The Movement, Methodologies, and People Who Influenced It Thomas Gainey CHHI 301: History of the Christian Church I February 7, 2016 Introduction In Christianity one of the key factors of its faith is the belief that the Bible is inerrant. Many great Christian leaders have expressed the importance of the Bible. Norman Geisler once stated “The inerrancy of Scripture is the foundational doctrine in which all other doctrines rest, and the Psalmist rightly said, ‘If the foundation be destroyed, then what can the righteous do?’” In his statement he expresses the truth behind the fact that the Christian faith resides on the fact that the Bible is inerrant. Interesting enough the Bible of today with its 66 books, 39 Old Testament, and 27 New Testament are very similar to the bible of the early church. In the words of Herman Ridderbos, "the history of the Canon is the process of the growing consciousness of the Church concerning its ecumenical foundation.” People have often wonder why certain books made into the Bible, but others did not. In this paper will look how we got the Bible we have today and what movements, people, and doctrines effected. Old Testament Canon The Old Testament known to Christians in the Bible is what is known to Jews as the Tanakh. This is made of the writings of the Laws, the Prophets, and the Psalms. Jesus Christ stated in Luke 24:44 “Everything must be fulfilled that is written about me in the Law of Moses, the Prophets......

Words: 2229 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Re: Db Forum

...Foundation: The Orthodoxy and the Canon 4/25/2016 Submitted To- Professor C Paul King CHHI-301 2 Foundation: The Orthodoxy and the Canon Many in today’s culture follow this sad, but dangerous view: there is no truth that can be deemed as absolute truth. A few years back, I can recall sitting in a classroom at a Union County High school here in Tennessee, as the teacher begins to introduce himself and his stance on philosophy. The teacher, in his introduction states an ignorant statement in a very arrogant manner: “There is no such thing as absolute truth, just personal opinion.” He continued by stating, “Because there is no absolute truth, there is no absolute truth in the matter of what is right and wrong.” A few students were shocked by this statement and raised their hands to ask about whether certain issues were right or wrong–– such as stealing, murder, drug use, abortion, and similar issues. He attempted to shoot all their examples down, with a sense of arrogance on his face. I slowly slipped my hand up and asked him the following statement: “What about incest, where relatives molest and rape their children?” I will never forget the look on his face, his smirk swiftly dropped to the floor. As he stumbled through his incoherent response, I thought about the importance of absolute truth. Christians need to realize the importance of what our Canon represents: a book of absolute truth given to us by our God. We are living in a generation......

Words: 2036 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Bible Study Guide

...The Book Hebrews Author: Luke, Paul, Apollos, Barnabas, etc. Luke wrote for the use of medical terminology. Syntax- the study of rules Luke quoted the Greek Old Testament. May have written this in Greek from a sermonic construction that heard many times from Paul. Paul may have written this because: Early church He knew the Old Testament and Levitical Law He knew Timothy Sermonic construction Date: Before Paul died 66 A.D and before Jerusalem was destroyed 70 A.D Some early manuscripts included “To Hebrews” These were Christian Jews who were persecuted. Key Word: Better Really cared about the Word of God Passionate to demonstrate that Jesus was greater Committed to the high priesthood of Jesus How God separated the old from the new There were waves of persecution by against the Church in Jerusalem, mostly because of rivalry or competition, even though they shared cultural-religious backgrounds. The book of Hebrews is God’s call to Jewish Christians to leave the temple worship and only follow Christ. The Roman Titus destroyed Jerusalem Written to Jewish Christians who were involved in Temple worship. Believer were guilty of sacrificing animals Why Luke probably wrote Hebrews Was written to the Jewish Christians who were going back into Temple practices and Jewish customs Quoted Septuagint version of the Old Testament Not Pauline syntax Use of medical terms because Luke was a doctor No introduction Paul always quoted the Hebrew......

Words: 3531 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

Foundation of Orthodoxy and Formation of the Canon

...THE FOUNDATION OF ORTHODOXY AND THE FORMATION OF THE CANON Presented to Professor G. Johnson For CHHI 301-D06 LUO By Dana Peebles L25945367 July 18, 2015   Throughout the legacy of Rome there has been much conversation over the rise and fall of the empire. From the government and its ideas to establish an effective common law, to the economic and social status of the culture and what the values and beliefs are for Christians, the foundation of orthodoxy and the formation of the canon becomes quite influential in this process. It is my desire to explain that despite the disputes going on within the early church, the essential matters such as the nature, humanity, and deity of Christ are critical to the rise of Christianity. The fact that the “Roman law also influenced the church law,” is something that cannot go unnoticed either, as it was “derived from the Bible, the church fathers, church councils, and the decisions of popes.” [1]. In describing this and relating it to how we view the Bible today and its inerrancy, the formation of the New Testament Canon and its relationship to orthodox tradition can “accurately embody the revealed truth content of Christianity” and what that means for the church universal. [2]. In today’s world, often times people take for granted what the New Testament represents. We live day to day reading and trying to apply the teachings of Christ as Christians everywhere strive to follow God’s Word. However, we do......

Words: 1689 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Paul's Prison Letters

...1. How were the churches in the Lycus Valley founded? (Polhill pp. 330-331) The churches appear to have been established by Paul’s coworker Epaphras, who was a native Colossian. Luke indicated that during Paul’s ministry in Ephesus all the Jews and Greeks who lived in the province of Asia heard the word of the Lord. Paul followed his usual missionary strategy of establishing himself in a major city with his coworkers fanning out into the countryside to establish churches in the wider region. The Lycus Valley churches were a product of Paul’s Ephesian ministry. Epaphras served as Paul’s coworker, establishing the churches there. Paul did consider them his churches, as they were the product of his apostolic ministry. When difficulties arose in them, Epapharas turned to Paul for guidance and assistance. Colossians is the product of that relationship. 2. Describe each of the three cities in the Lycus Valley. (Pohill pp. 331-332) Laodicea was a new fairly city, having been founded by the Seleucid king Antiochus II in 250 B.C. and then under direct Roman rule in 133 B.C. when the last of the kings of Pergamum bequeathed his kingdom in Rom. In Paul’s day, Laodicea was the most prominent city of the Lycus Valley; it was the tax-gathering and judicial center for the whole administrative area, which consisted of twenty-seven towns, including Hierapolis and Colosse. It was prosperous, boasting a thriving industry in black woolen goods and a famous medical......

Words: 2493 - Pages: 10