Free Essay

Good to Great

In: Business and Management

Submitted By hazaa
Words 2117
Pages 9
Executive Summary
Jim Collins, already established as one of the most influential management consultants, further established his credibility with the wildly popular Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap...and Others Don’t, originally published in 2001. The book went on to be one of the bestsellers in the genre, and it is now widely regarded as a modern classic of management theory.
Collins takes up a daunting challenge in the book: identifying and evaluating the factors and variables that allow a small fraction of companies to make the transition from merely good to truly great. ‘Great,’ an admittedly subjective term, is operationally defined according to a number of metrics, including, specifically, financial performance that exceeded the market average by several orders of magnitude over a sustained period of time. Using these criteria, Collins and his research team exhaustively catalogued the business literature, identifying a handful of companies that fulfilled their predetermined criteria for greatness. Then, the defining characteristics that differentiated these ‘great’ firms from their competitors were quantified and analyzed.
The resulting data are presented in Good to Great in compelling detail. Over the course of 9 chapters, Collins addresses a number of management, personnel, and operational practices, behaviors, and attitudes that are both conducive and antithetical to the good-to-great transition. One overarching theme that links together virtually all of Collins’ arguments is the need to define a narrowly focused objective and field of competency and then focus all of the company’s resources toward that area of strength. Repeatedly, Collins warns that straying too far from a company’s established strengths is inimical to the attainment of greatness. Finally, Collins links the findings of Good to Great to the conclusions he reached in his previous book, Built to Last, which focused on the factors that define companies that survive in the long-term, meshing both sets of results into an overarching framework for enduring success.

Chapter Summaries
Chapter 1: Good is the Enemy of Great
The first chapter of the book lays out the criteria that Collins and his research team used in selecting the companies that served as the basis of the meta-analysis that provided the findings set forth in the book. The most important factor in the selection process was a period of growth and sustained success that far outpaced the market or industry average. Based on the stated criteria, the companies that were selected for inclusion were Abbott, Fannie Mae, Circuit City, Gillette, Kimberly-Clark, Kroger, Nucor, Philip Morris, Pitney Bowes,Walgreens, and Wells Fargo.
Collins also offers a few of the most significant findings gleaned from the study. Of particular note are the many indications that factors such as CEO compensation, technology, mergers and acquisitions, and change management initiatives played relatively minor roles in fostering the Good to Great process. Instead, Collins found that successes in three main areas, which he terms disciplined people, disciplined thought, and disciplined action, were likely the most significant factors in determining a company’s ability to achieve greatness.

Chapter 2: Level 5 Leadership
In this chapter, Collins begins the process of identifying and further explicating the unique factors and variables that differentiate good and great companies. One of the most significant differences, he asserts, is the quality and nature of leadership in the firm. Collins goes on to identify "Level 5 leadership" as a common characteristic of the great companies assessed in the study. This type of leadership forms the top level of a 5-level hierarchy that ranges from merely competent supervision to strategic executive decision-making.
By further studying the behaviors and attitudes of so-called Level 5 leaders, Collins found that many of those classified in this group displayed an unusual mix of intense determination and profound humility. These leaders often have a long-term personal sense of investment in the company and its success, often cultivated through a career-spanning climb up the company’s ranks. The personal ego and individual financial gain are not as important as the long-term benefit of the team and the company to true Level 5 leaders. As such, Collins asserts that the much-touted trend of bringing in a celebrity CEO to turn around a flailing firm is usually not conducive to fostering the transition from Good to Great.

Chapter 3: First Who, Then What
The next factor that Collins identifies as part of the Good to Great process is the nature of the leadership team. Specifically, Collins advances the concept that the process of securing high-quality, high-talent individuals with Level 5 leadership abilities must be undertaken before an overarching strategy can be developed. With the right people in the right positions, Collins contends that many of the management problems that plague companies and sap valuable resources will automatically dissipate. As such, he argues, firms seeking to make the Good to Great transition may find it worthwhile to expend extra energy and time on personnel searches and decision-making.
Collins also underscores the importance of maintaining rigorousness in all personnel decisions. He recommends moving potentially failing employees and managers to new positions, but not hesitating to remove personnel who are not actively contributing. He also recommends that hiring should be delayed until an absolutely suitable candidate has been identified. Hewing to both of these guidelines, Collins claims, will likely save time, effort, and resources in the long-term.

Chapter 4: Confront the Brutal Facts (Yet Never Lose Faith)
Another key element of some companies’ unique ability to make the transition from Good to Great is the willingness to identify and assess defining facts in the company and in the larger business environment. In today’s market, trends in consumer preferences are constantly changing, and the inability to keep apace with these changes often results in company failure. Using the example of an extended comparative analysis of Kroger and A & P, Collins observes that Kroger recognized the trend towards modernization in the grocery industry and adjusted its business model accordingly, although doing so required a complete transformation of the company and its stores. A & P, on the other hand, resisted large-scale change, and thus guaranteed its own demise.
Collins outlines a four-step process to promote awareness of emerging trends and potential problems: 1) Lead with questions, not answers; 2) Engage in dialogue and debate, not coercion; 3) Conduct autopsies without blame; and 4) Build red flag mechanisms that turn information into information that cannot be ignored.
Chapter 5: The Hedgehog Concept (Simplicity Within the Three Circles)
In this chapter, Collins uses the metaphor of the hedgehog to illustrate the seemingly contradictory principle that simplicity can sometimes lead to greatness. When confronted by predators, the hedgehog’s simple but surprisingly effective response is to roll up into a ball. While other predators, such as the fox, may be impressively clever, few can devise a strategy that is effective enough to overcome the hedgehog’s simple, repetitive response.
Similarly, Collins asserts, the way to make the transformation from Good to Great is often not doing many things well, but instead, doing one thing better than anyone else in the world. It may take time to identify the single function that will be a particular firm’s "hedgehog concept," but those who do successfully identify it are often rewarded with singular success. In order to help expedite this process, Collins suggests using the following three criteria: 1) Determine what you can be best in the world at and what you cannot be best in the world at; 2) Determine what drives your economic engine; and 3) Determine what you are deeply passionate about.

Chapter 6: A Culture of Discipline
Another defining characteristic of the companies that Collins defined as great in his study was an overarching organizational culture of discipline. He is quick to point out that a culture of discipline is not to be confused with a strict authoritarian environment; instead, Collins is referring to an organization in which each manager and staff member is driven by an unrelenting inner sense of determination. In this type of organization, each individual functions as an entrepreneur, with a deeply rooted personal investment in both their own work and the company’s success.
Although this discipline will manifest itself in a high standard of quality in the work that is produced by managers and employees alike, its most significant outcome will be an almost fanatical devotion to the objectives outlined in the "hedgehog concept" exercises. Disciplined workers will be better equipped to hew to these goals with a single-minded intensity that, according to Collins, will foster the transformation from merely Good to Great. In addition, the author asserts, it is important that within this overarching culture of discipline, every team member is afforded the degree of personal empowerment and latitude that is necessary to ensure that they will be able to go to unheard-of extremes to bring the firm’s envisioned objectives into existence.

Chapter 7: Technology Accelerators
Today, many businesses have come to depend upon technology to increase efficiency, reduce overhead, and maximize competitive advantage. However, Collins cautions that technology should not be regarded as a potential panacea for all that ails a company. The folly of this kind of thinking was revealed in the aftermath of the crash of the tech bubble in the early 2000s. The market correction threw into sharp relief the differences between sustainable uses of the Internet to extend established businesses and ill-planned, unviable online start-ups.
Collins contends that the good-to-great companies approach the prospect of new and emerging technologies with the same prudence and careful deliberation that characterizes all of their other business decisions. Further, these companies tend to apply technology in a manner that is reflective of their "hedgehog concepts" -- typically by selecting and focusing solely upon the development of a few technologies that are fundamentally compatible with their established strengths and objectives. Collins characterizes the ideal approach to technology with the following cycle: "Pause -- Think -- Crawl -- Walk -- Run."

Chapter 8: The Flywheel and the Doom Loop
In this chapter, Collins describes two cycles that demonstrate the way that business decisions tend to accumulate incrementally in either an advantageous or a disadvantageous manner. Both, the author emphasizes, accrue over time. Despite the popular misperception that business success or failure often occurs suddenly, Collins asserts that it more typically occurs over the course of years, and that both only transpire after sufficient positive or negative momentum has been accrued.
Collins describes the advantageous business cycle that, in some cases, can foster the transition from Good to Great as "the flywheel effect." By making decisions and taking actions that reinforce and affirm the company’s "hedgehog" competencies, executives initiate positive momentum. This, in turn, results in the accumulation of tangible positive outcomes, which serve to energize and earn the investment and loyalty of the staff. This revitalization of the team serves to further build momentum. If the cycle continues to repeat in this manner, the transition from Good to Great is likely to transpire. In contrast, the doom loop is characterized by reactive decision-making, an overextension into too many diverse areas of concentration, following short-lived trends, frequent changes in leadership and personnel, loss of morale, and disappointing results.

Chapter 9: From Good to Great to Built to Last
In the concluding chapter of Good to Great, Collins makes a connection between this book and his previous work, Built to Last, which represented the findings of a six-year study into the factors that determined whether a new company would survive in the long-term. First and foremost, Collins contends that companies need a set of core values in order to achieve the kind of long-term, sustainable success that may lead to greatness. Companies need to exist for a higher purpose than mere profit generation in order to transcend the category of merely good. According to Collins, this purpose does not have to be specific -- even if the shared values that compel the company toward success are as open-ended as being the best at what they do and achieving excellence consistently, that may be sufficient as long as the team members are equally dedicated to the same set of values.
Although many of the conclusions of both of the books overlap, Collins notes that Good to Great should not be seen as the follow-up to Built to Last, which focuses on sustaining success in the long-term. Instead, Good to Great actually functions as the prequel to Built to Last. First, a company should focus on developing the foundation that is necessary to work toward greatness. Then, they can begin to apply the principles of longevity that are set forth in Built to Last.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Good to Great

..."Good is the enemy of great” is the first sentence in Jim Collins book; Good to Great, Why Some Companies Make the Leap…and Other Don’t. Jim Collins says, because good is the enemy of great, is one of the key reasons why we have so little that becomes great. This book is packed with leading edge thinking, understandable examples, and data to support the conclusions. It is a challenge for CEOs, entrepreneurs and leaders to show evidence of the discipline required to shift their companies from Good to Great. Jim Collins and his research team of 20 compared and contrasted how many companies made the leap to greatness and how other companies didn’t. Based on bundles of evidence and a large quantity of data, he and his team uncovered how the good to great companies like Abbott, Circuit City, Fannie Mae, Gillette, Kimberly-Clark, Kroger, Nucor, Philip Morris, Pitney Bowes, Walgreens, and Wells Fargo maintained great results and accomplished enduring greatness, evolving into companies that were undeniably “Built to Last”. It’s strange that the research performed showed an opposition of what we had always thought, “People are our most important asset”. Instead the researched showed that the right people are the better people, in other words “First get the right people on the bus and the wrong people off the bus” and then later decide on when and where to drive the bus. Collins plans out three stages, each with two key concepts. These six concepts are the heart of Good to......

Words: 948 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Good to Great

...Good to Great “Why Some Companies Make the Leap... and Others Don’t" Harper Business, 2001, New York, NY. Review BySwarup Bose © www.hrfolks.com All Rights Reserved Table of Contents About the Author……………………………………….3 Thesis…………………………………………………...3 Chapter 1. Good is the Enemy of Great……………...4 Chapter 2.Level 5 Leadership………………………..5 Chapter 3. First Who….Then what…………………..6 Chapter 4. Confront the brutal facts…………………7 Chapter 5. Hedgehog Concept………………………9 Chapter 6. Cultural Discipline……………………….10 Chapter 7. Technological Accelerators…………….11 Chapter 8. The Flywheel And the Doom Loop…….12 Chapter 9. From Good To great To built to Last…..14 Learnings from Good to great……………………….15 Critique…………………………………………………16 . © www.hrfolks.com All Rights Reserved About the Author : Jim Collins is a student and teacher of enduring great companies -- how they grow, how they attain superior performance, and how good companies can become great companies. Having invested over a decade of research into the topic, Jim has co-authored three books, including the classic Built to Last, a fixture on the Business Week bestseller list for s eliminated wasteful luxuries, like executive dining rooms, corporate jets, lavish vacation spots, etc., for the good of the co mpany - to other people, external factors, and good luck. All 11 of the featured companies had this type of leadership, charactmulti-year research projects and works with executives from the private,......

Words: 8483 - Pages: 34

Free Essay

Good to Great

...Good to Great: Why some companies make the leap... And others don’t? Good to Great, published in March 2001 , is actually a narrative presentation of the quest of Jim Collins and his team as they conducted a research study regarding company performance which rooted from a single question: Can a good company become a great company and, if so, how? This seed of question was planted in the mind of Collins when confronted by Bill Meehan that his book “Built to Last”, which was about “how you take a company with great results and turn it into an enduring great company of iconic stature”, is considered useless in the world of business. As pointed out by Meehan, the companies written in Built to Last “never had to turn themselves from good companies into great companies” as they were always great. Challenged, Jim Collins started the five-year research of how a good company can become great. The study of Collins turned out into another breakthrough as it was systematically planned and well-structured; from six long months of search and analyzing financial reports of hundreds or even thousands of companies, identifying which companies made the leap from good results to great results and sustained those results for at least fifteen years and still taking into account their independence to the industry performance in which they belong, presenting and debating ,debating and debating until they’ve found eleven good-to-great companies to further study. The research, backed up......

Words: 1330 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Good to Great Book Review

...Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap... and Others Don’t ‘Good things take time, but great things happen all at once.’ – Rat Race. Jim Collins counters criticisms on Built to Last with Good to Great, by unfolding sought-after information on how to turn a company into a great one. ‘Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap…and Others Don’t’ written by Jim Collins in 2001 is the outcome of a rather ambitious research project. Collins and his team studied 11 companies, chosen out of 1,435 companies, which were able to transform themselves from ‘good’ companies to ‘great’ companies. These 11 companies were included based on at least 15 years of advanced performance. The research demonstrates the course of action that ‘good’ companies take on their journey to becoming ‘great’. Jim Collins began his research as a Stanford Graduate School of Business faculty member. At Stanford University, Collins has degrees in mathematics and business administration, as well as degrees from the University of Colorado and the Peter F. Drucker Graduate School of Management at Claremont Graduate University. In 1995, he founded a management laboratory in Boulder, Colorado where he continues to perform research and discuss his findings with executives from social and corporate areas. Collins has worked with CEOs in several companies and social sector organizations. He is the author and co-author of five books that revolve around his research including Built to Last, with Jerry I.......

Words: 1737 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

《Good to Great》—Book Review

...《Good to Great》—Book Review “Good to Great”, written by Jim Collins, is not only a guide book for company development but also can apply in self-development of every single person. It is mainly about the seven steps to constructing a system to turn a good or even bad company to a great company. I would like to share some feelings about this book with you in the following paragraphs. To start with, when talking about becoming great, there are seven pivotal steps that we must do. Firstly, we need to find the 5 level leadership. Secondly, finding the proper staff is more important than doing the proper things. Thirdly, confronting the brutal reality is also a necessity for being great. Fourthly, we should insisting on hedgehog concept throughout the process. Fifthly, we need to share a culture of discipline in the whole company. Sixthly, using technology as an accelerator when necessary. Seventhly, putting all these disciplines into practical management cyclically then we will make a difference and become great. As to the first step, finding the 5 level leadership, I think this is the key to the whole process. The core of 5 level leadership is to lead the company to gain sustaining development. A 5 level leadership can gain brilliant achievements in his or her duration and also can help construct a system to gain consisting achievements after his or her duration, this is the difference between a 4 level leadership and a 5 level leadership. Therefore, I think......

Words: 2355 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

Book Report Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap… and Others Don’t (Jim Collins, 1996)

...Book Report Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap… and Others Don’t (Jim Collins, 1996) In his book “Good to Great” Jim Collins asked the question, "Can a good company become a great company and if so, how?" Collins and a devoted team of 22 researchers embarked to discover what transforms good companies into truly great companies. To begin the research for the Good-to-Great study, they searched for companies that: performed at or below the general stock market for at least fifteen years; then at a transition point began to pull away from the competition, and sustained returns of at least 3 times the general market for the next fifteen years. They started with a list of 1,435 companies that appeared on the Fortune 500 list from 1965 to 1995 and ended up with only 11 that made the cut. These eleven companies produced, on average, a return of 6.9 times the general stock market during the 15 years following the transition points. Collins chose a 15-year span to avoid "one-hit wonders" and lucky breaks. The companies that were selected were Abbott Laboratories, Circuit City, Federal Home Loan Mortgage, Gillette, Kimberly-Clark, Kroger, Nucor, Philip Morris, Pitney Bowes, Walgreens, and Wells Fargo. In the book, Collins highlights some important factors which are the result of the research. Although there are several factors involved for taking a company from good to great', what these great companies turned out to have in common was a particular kind of......

Words: 1777 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Good to Great

...Good to Great Humility +Will=Level By Jim Collins “How on earth did a company with such a long history of being nothing special transform itself into an enterprise that outperformed some of the best led organizations in the world”? Like every other humankind I want to become a better person and not only that but I wanted to be well known and transform myself from good to great. In addition to my dream of thought to become a better leader I found this article to be extremely interesting. Jim Collins has done a wonderful job identifying what it makes for a company to go from good to great. He highlights the very important factors on how to go from good to great. Well, I am sure I learned something from this article on how anyone with enthusiasm can transform a good company to a great company. That is by well managed planning and decisions. However, only few of companies makes it to “Great” To go from good to great is not easy, but if with passion one can find out the core factors which lead to a good company. The model Collins used is to search for the companies that performed at or below the general stock market for at least 15 years, than at a transition point began to pull away from the competition. That sustained returns of at least 3 times the general market for the next 15 years. Collins with a list of 1,435 companies and found eleven that met his criteria. These 11 companies produced, on average, a return of 6.9 times the general stock market during the 15 years......

Words: 693 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

The Good and the Great

...Good to Great Book Analysis By Zain Muzammil Jim Collins “Good to Great” sold 3 million copies and became one of the top sellers in its genre. In the book, Collins takes up a daunting challenge in the book: identifying and evaluating the factors and variables that allow a small fraction of companies to make the transition from merely good to truly great. The extensive research conducted by Jim Collins and his team of analysts provides extravagant turnarounds of a few successful companies that were able to turn themselves from merely great to the greatest in the industry. Jim Collins believe that a great companies are always accompanied by “Great Leaders”, and he states them as Level 5 leadership. Great leaders cannot be selfish nor can they let their egoistic nature- from the position- to with-held the success of the company. Rather Jim narrates that they should be humble and modest. Ken Iverson, who lead Nucor’s transformation from bankruptcy to being one of the most successful companies in the world, was reported as being one of the most humble and modest CEO by board member Jim Hlavacek. Another key factor that Collins underscores as a part of Good to Great is the nature of the leadership team. He coins it as “First who and then what”. It is very important for a company to illustrate and reflect on the kind of leadership that a company has. If you have all the right people on the bus who willing to accomplish the unthinkable only then can a......

Words: 737 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Good to Great

...GOOD TO GREAT - Good to Great is a fantastic book via the compilation of 15,000 hours of hard work. With the support of a 21 person research team, top graduate students at the University of Colorado, and Executive interviews and follow-ups, these contribution made it possible to bring author, Jim Collin’s, book to life. Throughout these nine chapters, Jim Collin and his teams capture different methodology from a phasing approach such as (The Search, Compared to What, Inside the Black Box,, Chaos to Concept) to such concepts as the Flywheel and the Doom Loop. It’s was through my understanding that I discovered, what I believed, what takes companies from good to great and why are we compelled to try to create that greatness. . As reflected in Chapter 1, the “great” companies of today often endure years of an overwhelming shadow before their great results compel the world to look at them. It is with this perception that often leads many to perceive them as just another company. These leaps into greatness were not a result of massive company upheavals such as a New CEO with new and radical changes. In fact, the mark of a great company comes from result from change that occurs overtime due to the amount of effort, not just to the instant gratification of overnight results with a concept Collins refers to as, 'pushing against the flywheel'. After 5 five-years evaluating of 11 companies, Collin’s was able to distinguish what accounts for the sudden and sustained rise......

Words: 1138 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Good to Great

...The objectives after finishing an MBA program. Short term objectives Have the company registered as a professional investor. There is an obstacle that makes us at the moment not competitive in the market in some investments because the conditions to become a professional investor are: a. Have minimum 500.000 euros in equity. b. Minimum 5 year of experience in business and investment. c. Graduate degree from a university or one year experience in banking. It is my firm believe that a MBA degree can help me and my company competitively because with a MBA degree and registered as a professional investor my company will have the chance to participate in investments and therefore enhance the growth opportunities that otherwise might be missed. That may affect both growth and profitability of my company and affect my long term objective. Long term objectives Further develop the company and reach the growth and profitability objectives in order to be able to register the company in the First North stock market. Based on the size of Golden Seafood today, it is my objective that in 5 to 6 years the company will have reached the financial platform to advance to the third level in investments, to make the company a recognizable investor in the Icelandic fishing industry. Having reached that then the company will have all the necessary criteria to be registered on the First North stock market. With that the company will have the opportunity to get experienced investors to be on the......

Words: 412 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Good to Great

...Travis-1 Professor Dungan DEVW-143 September 23,2008 “It Is Hard To Make Time out To Study And Learn when you been out Of School so long.” Once you have been out of school for a long time it’s harder to learn and make the time to study. You have to discipline yourself and make time to study and spend time with your family. Unlike when you live at home with your parents, you have more responsibilities and outside influences that prevent you from studying. In most cases studying has to take the back burner. Because I’ve been out of school so long, it feels like I’m starting from scratch. Some of the basic things in education I have forgotten. I’m often looking up words and having my wife read my papers and give me her opinion. This takes up a lot of time because I have to take two steps backwards to get one step forward. My son also makes it hard for me to study. Don’t get me wrong, he comes before school, but school is also my obligation. He’s five years old and demands a lot of my attention. It seems he wants attention while I’m studying. So, I try to wait until after he goes to bed before I start studying. Sometimes in the process of putting him to bed, I fall asleep myself. While I’m at work, during lunch I try to read in my car. I have a co-worker that always likes to interrupt me. I try to give him a hint by saying “I sure do have a lot of homework to do”. But he never gets the clue and before you know it lunch is over.......

Words: 333 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Pop Music

...[22:02:48] simas: Goal 1 [22:02:51] simas: Goal 2 [22:02:55] simas: and Goal 3 [22:02:59] simas: :) by eli goldratt [22:03:13] simas: than [22:03:17] simas: The choice [22:03:20] simas: by the same author [22:03:25] simas: :) a bit much harder [22:03:26] simas: read [22:03:35] simas: actually not an easy [22:03:36] simas: way [22:03:43] simas: read [22:03:47] simas: not way [22:03:56] simas: but still interesting [22:04:15] simas: Funky business [22:04:21] simas: i think there are 2 books [22:04:23] simas: funky business [22:04:26] simas: and funky business 2 [22:04:27] simas: :D [22:04:40] simas: han how to clone a blonde i think its called this way [22:04:45] simas: tipping oint [22:04:47] simas: point [22:05:05] Lusya: oki doki, these all sounds grrrreat! [22:05:22] simas: Who moved my chease [22:05:25] simas: ? [22:05:41] simas: Than [22:06:02] simas: Purple cow [22:06:03] Lusya: you read all of the above?! [22:06:07] simas: yeah [22:06:13] simas: maybe 1 or 2 books i havent [22:06:22] simas: dont remmber need to re read [22:06:24] simas: :D [22:06:29] Lusya: wow [22:06:45] Lusya: book possessed u r lol [22:06:54] simas: I read them during the years [22:06:55] simas: :)) [22:06:59] simas: soo not all now [22:07:00] simas: :)) [22:07:02] simas: but yeah [22:07:05] simas: let me se there are more [22:07:15] Lusya: very well done man, no seriously [22:11:41] simas: Now [22:11:42] simas: a [22:11:46] simas: list of books i did not......

Words: 700 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Halo Effect

...common halo effects is the judgment that a good looking person is intelligent and amiable. There is also a reverse halo effect whereby perception of a negative or undesirable trait in individuals, brands, or other things influences further negative judgments about the traits of that individual, brand, etc. If a person "looks evil" or "looks guilty" you may judge anything he says or does with suspicion; eventually you may feel confident that you have confirmed your first impression with solid evidence when, in fact, your evidence is completely tainted and conditioned by your first impression. The hope that the halo effect will influence a judge or jury is one reason some criminal lawyers might like their clients to be clean-shaven and dressed neatly when they appear at trial. The phrase was coined by psychologist Edward Thorndike in 1920 to describe the way commanding officers rated their soldiers. He found that officers usually judged their men as being either good or bad "right across the board. There was little mixing of traits; few people were said to be good in one respect but bad in another."* The old saying that first impressions make lasting impressions is at the heart of the halo effect. If a soldier made a good (or bad) first impression on his commanding officer, that impression would influence the officer's judgment of future behavior. It is very unlikely that given a group of soldiers every one of them would be totally good or totally bad at everything, but......

Words: 2915 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Good Seafood, Great Health

...Good Seafood, Great Health OUTLINE Claim: Doctors and chefs agree seafood tastes great; seafood is a very healthy food source and the supply is plentiful. Antithesis: When stored or prepared incorrectly, seafood can be deadly. I. Nutritional and Health facts A. Types of fish and cholesterol B. Low-Density Lipoprotein(LDL) and High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) C. Seafood diets and long life II. Ways to consume and prepare healthy seafood A. Raw B. Baked / Broiled C. Boiled D. Grilling E. Fried F. Processing III. Types of seafood A. Scaled fish B. Shell C. Fresh water D. Thick and thin skinned IV. Sources of seafood A. Oceans, bays and gulfs B. Rivers, lakes and ponds C. Wild and farm raised Seafood is by far the ultimate choice when it comes to the combination of taste and health. On the nutrition scene, seafood has minimal Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL or bad cholesterol) and is stacked with High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL or good cholesterol). Scientists have found a diet high in seafood consumption leads to longer life expectancy. As for taste, seafood contains a plethora of choices when it comes to variety and preparation (“Tips for preparing Seafood”). Seafood is caught or farmed all over the world in ponds, lakes, rivers, streams, seas and oceans. Without a doubt doctors and chefs agree seafood tastes great; seafood is a very healthy food source and the supply is plentiful. Doctors at the world......

Words: 2015 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Great Men Need Not Be Good Men

...Great men need not be good men. Greatness outweighs good qualities in an individual. It is defined as a state of superiority, a quality possessed by several individuals who stand out from the normal social construct. This quality places an individual under the admiration of the masses. It gives the individual a superior advantage over his fellow counterparts in a specific area of interest in which he has attained greatness. One is only regarded as a great when he has reached the pinnacle of success in his area of interest. On the other hand good is a quality possessed by a fairly larger amount of society in comparison to those who possess greatness. Good is a quality that requires an individual to uphold ethically sound qualities in relation to society’s norm. An individual who demonstrates characteristics such as integrity, honesty, humility and etc is classified as a good individual. There is a clear distinction between both the qualities. It is irrelevant that a man needs to be good in order to be considered a great. A great man may be a good person in his own terms, living a life within boundaries created by himself, like superman in Nietzsche’s words. On the contrary, another man may be deemed good by society living under the oppressive boundaries that society has set for him. Not living his life to its fullest but living a life to meet the terms of society’s goodness. In the words of Nietzsche, “Great men, like great epochs, are like explosive material in whom......

Words: 1139 - Pages: 5