Googles Case

In: Business and Management

Submitted By forreal
Words 1056
Pages 5
Introduction
The purpose of this case review is to summarize the case and identify the key issues. We also will evaluate how Google's mission statement is related to its business strategy, how their information systems strategy supports its business strategy, and how Google's organizational strategy supports its business strategy. Additionally we will identify which of Porter’s three generic strategies is Google employing. Finally we will analyze Google's strategy and the type of market disruption it has created using a dynamic environment perspective.
Case Summary
Google Inc was founded in 1998, and has grown to serve hundreds of thousands of users and customers around the world by providing access to a free search engine that locates information on the World Wide Web. Their mission is to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful.
Google has created a simple but successful business strategy that is focused on attracting Internet users to their search engine and earning revenue from targeted advertisement. According to Sounders (2013) Google is operating on a simple but innovative business model of attracting Internet users to its free search services and earning revenue from targeted advertisement. They are accomplishing this task through the use of their AdWords and AdSense programs. According to Sounders (2013) AdWords enables businesses to place ads on Google and its network of publishing partners and AdSense allows them to push advertisements on publishing partners websites targeting specific audiences.
Google Inc currently offers over 120 different products or service and is actively seeking to enter new markets or develop new products. According to Sounders (2013) Google continues to take risks and expand into new markets. This strategy has been supported by the implementation of a corporate culture that fosters…...

Similar Documents

Google Case

...Google Case Study Questions 1. How is Google’s mission statement related to its business strategy? Google’s mission is to make the world’s information universally accessible, demand products that support assistive technologies and provide a useful and enjoyable experience for everyone, including those with physical and cognitive limitations (Google, n.d.). Google uses the Internet to make its’ products universally accessible. The value proposition for the Google user involves receiving free Internet tools and applications in exchange for viewing content relevant advertising. Google believes relevant advertising can be useful and enjoyable for the user (Google, nod.). In order to increase revenue, Google must increase the number of places where it can display advertisements. Google continually creates new products which provide new advertising opportunities for Google. The advertiser is concerned with the amount of sales volume generated by the Google advertisement. Because a user is specifically searching for a topic when an ad is presented, Google advertisements are relevant to the user. When a user views a relevant ad, there is a greater likelihood that the user will purchase the product or service. Google’s contribution to advertising relevance is the hybrid paid search ranking scheme which rank search ads based on the combination of bid price and click through rate. By adding click through rate, Google not only maximized income but also increased the...

Words: 2319 - Pages: 10

Google Case

...How does a search engine work (1) and make money (2)? What is the exportability of a search engine's technology and business model (3)? (1) Internet search engines are websites designed for the purpose of helping people to find information stored on other web pages. Those search engines are working as follows: - web crawlers scan through billions of pages based on important words, - list them in an index to determine their location which is constantly updated and - allow users to look for words or combination of words found in that index In order to provide the user with popular and accurate results, Google does not only search for key words inside the web pages but also applies a PageRank technology which ranks these pages by the number and popularity of other sites linked to the page. (2) Google earns their revenue from two different sources: First though selling its technology to other sites and second through advertising on their website. Developing over the years there were several different advertising programmes: Google started with launching ‘premium sponsorship’ in first quarter of 2000, a program offering advertisers the ability to place text-based advertisements on Google’s website targeted to the keywords the users are using. Payments were made by the advertisers based on the number of times they were displayed on the search results page. Next they released AdWords at the end of 2000, which allowed advertisers to place those advertisements on a Cost-Per...

Words: 324 - Pages: 2

Google Case

...Google Case When someone has to find something on the net he has to google it...That's the appropriate answer to the first question we examin today. Google strategy is infact primarly focused on collecting, organizing and finally making information available to his customer. All the functions must be always performed faster and more complete than before. Google has not been the search engine but it has dictated the standard to all the other companies offering the same services. That's a challenging scope considering the always growing extent of the net. Google occupy a relevant place in its market, it can be defined to be in a dominant position with its market share both in the resident pcs and in mobile applications. The first little crack in its castle started here, infact we have to edit the second point in Google decalogue, infact its core business in not only research anymore. It was in tha past but now the company has to diversificate in order to keep its valuable competitor position in the future. Only in this way Google could be able to mantain its current level on rents. So we have assisted to various strategic moves, both with innovation and acquisition, that we can split in two major branches: A.- Enhance the services offered with new and powerfull web based applications like Google play, Google maps, knowledge graph, social network and Google Cloud. Its main strategy is "forcing" to integrate this application in quite every web site in the world (ex.maps) with...

Words: 967 - Pages: 4

Google Case

... information within this report has come from vast resources, ranging from academic journals and books, the lack of academic investigations such as survey etc. has to be recognised on analysis of practice of Google. 1. Introduction The known Google was set up in September 1998 by its founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin who created an epoch-making search engine for people and even changed the world (Byrnes & Cowan, 2007). According to investigation (CNN Money, 2012), Google’s net income rose to about $2.8 billion, up 11% from a year earlier in the second quarter 2012. In the furious competition of cyber world, Google healthily develop yet which is quite rare and precious. Google’s success gives the business world lots of enlightenments on organizational behaviour especially employee motivation (Cleverly, 2011). In addition, Google also creates the unique hiring practices to hire the employees. Furthermore, the clear job design also plays a vital role in Google’ success. This report explains Google’s success on its culture by many motivational theories and critically evaluates hiring practice and job design principles of Google. 2. Explanation of Google’s success from a motivational theory perspective 2.1. Brief introduction of Google’s culture With the ongoing growth so far, Google has generated a unique system of human resource management to win a place around the world (Finkle, 2012). For example, as the 5th, 8th and 10th ‘top ten reasons’ said (case study...

Words: 2323 - Pages: 10

Google Case

... Process14 Introduction In this assignment we will take a closer look at how technology, and Internet in particular, is changing the “rules of game” when it comes to cultural exchange and how it creates a need to protect ones own culture. We will give a brief presentation of Google as a company, explaining how a search engine works and how money is generated. We will review the Google case in light of different theories based on empirical knowledge. First we chose to use the GLOBE theory and Hofstede’s five dimensions to show the most distinct cultural differences between the countries and their cultures. We use the GLOBE theory to explain the differences between cultural clusters. Hofstede’s research is more detailed and shows the biggest differences between countries. We chose these theories to illustrate the most extreme differences. Hall and Hall’s high and low context theory will reinforce the explanation below. Further we will use the negotiation process model, which shows the steps of what a company could take when entering new markets and countries. From this model, companies can get valuable information and build networks in the markets they are operating or attempting to enter. Google Inc. was founded in September 1998 by Stanford Graduates, Sergey Brin and Larry Page. By June 2000 it became the world’s largest search engine with its introduction of a billion page indexes. How does a search engine work and make money?Efficient search engine provides......

Words: 4490 - Pages: 18

Google Case

...Assignment 2: Case Study essay Subject Code : TBS906 Subject Name : Information Systems for Managers Due Date : May 9th, 2012 Submission Date : May 9th, 2012 Submitted to Ph.D. Kathy Ning Shen Prepared by Name : Abdulghafor Al Saeed ID : 3730499 Phone : +971 50 6153914 email : aaias996@uowmail.edu.au Table of Contents ABSTRACT 3 1. INTRODUCTION 4 1.1. GOOGLE EXPANSION IN BRIEF… 4 1.2. HOW GOOGLE BENEFIT US? GOOGLE PRODUCTS… 4 2. GOOGLE IS INNOVATION & COMPETITIVE FORCE 5 3. GOOGLE TRANSNATIONAL GLOBALIZATION 6 3.1. GOOGLE ADAPTING “FLAT WORLD” 6 3.2. GLOBALIZATION CHALLENGES 6 3.3. GOOGLE VS. GLOBAL ECONOMY 6 4. GOOGLE SERVICES SECURITY 7 5. REFERENCES 8 Abstract In the following report I analyzed the case study in discussion – Google Inc. – from the prospective of Information Systems related topics studied during this semester. These data represented in order to reach for better understanding of the relation between the success of Google & the Information system setup, infrastructure & strategy implemented in Google. 1. Introduction 1.1. Google expansion in brief… Founded by to colleagues “Larry Page & Sergey Brin” Google started in 1996 with the name of “BackRub”, it was a search engine that meant to use links to determine the importance of an individual webpages. (Google Mission 2012) In 1998; this search engine that...

Words: 1442 - Pages: 6

Google Case

...------------------------------------------------- Google Inc. ------------------------------------------------- [Document Subtitle] Ivan Castillo, Poliane Cruz, SharadhChandran Sethuraju Abstract Google case write-up Google Inc. 1. How did Google create a competitive advantage initially (before 2006)?  There are many types of competitive advantage, and they can be separated into two categories: advantages based on the firm’s position and advantages based on firm’s capabilities. Advantages based on the firm’s position happen when a company accomplishes superior performance because it was the first to enter the industry. The forms of positional advantage are: positional advantage from an attractive industry structure, positional advantage from heterogeneity within the industry, positional advantage from a network of relationships. Advantages based on the firm’s capabilities happen when a company is definitely better than most of its competitors, at performing certain activities. This type of advantage tends to be hard to identify. However it can be easier by starting with the areas that the firm has already demonstrated success. According to the explanation above, it is possible to say that Google create a competitive advantage initially (before 2006) based on the firm’s capabilities. Google was not the first company in its industry but Google was able to improve the techniques presented in the market and make them its competitive advantage. Yahoo...

Words: 1587 - Pages: 7

Google Case

...Memorandum To: Joe S.Anderson, Ph.D From: Ziyue Huang Date: 7/ 27/2014 Re: Google-case, due Monday in class(7-28-14) 1.How does Google’s mission drive strategy at the company? The mission of Google drive it provide an search engine with freedom and fairness to customer, it allow people to gain access to information without business bias and political block. That is why Google decide not let the commercial consideration bias their ranking result, and they provided the useful and correct information for people. 2.Is Google’s stance toward Internet search in China consistent with its mission Google stance in China market is not consistent with their mission, it conflict with the principal of fairness and freedom from Google. Because people could not access politically sensitive sites that appear in Google’s result due to the censorship of Chinese government, Google’s comprise with Chinese censorship had oppose to its principal in order to develop Chinese Market. But the truth is Google quit Chinese Market in 2009, because the leadership members of Google cannot stand the accusations from other organizations and customers, and they didn’t reach an agreement with Chinese government , finally Google quit Chinese market, it still follow principal finally. 3.Do you think that Google should have entered China and engaged in self-censorship, given the company’s long-standing mantra “Don’t be evil”? Is it better to engage in self-censorship than to...

Words: 419 - Pages: 2

Google Case

...Team 2- Decision Strategies | Google’s Case Analysis | | | Prashant Sinha, Xinyi Wang, Karthik Pedduri, Deepak Mittal, Shubham Goel | 11/5/2014 | | Case Background This case talks about Google, the world’s leading search engine and one of the world’s most technically innovative companies. Google was founded in 1998 by two Ph.D. students at Stanford who were able to leverage their algorithm to rank random search results by relevancy to build a multibillion dollar business. The company employs more than 30,000 people and is one of the most sort after companies for software engineers. Despite such a tremendous growth at a fast pace, Google has still been able to maintain the small company feel, giving its employees freedom to invest 20% of their time in any projects of their choice. This has been one of the sources of innovation for the company. SWOT Analysis for Google Strengths The biggest strength for Google is the established brand name with a worldwide market share of more than 70% in the search engine space. Also, Google has been able to distinguish its services from all others and has gained high awareness, perceived quality, and brand loyalty through its branding which is mostly done by word of mouth. Google has also been growing by acquiring companies with diversified market offerings. The leadership has ensured that most of the internet using population is using their products some way or the other making them the most successful marketing...

Words: 716 - Pages: 3

Google Case

...1.Google believed in capability based advantage. Search engine market before Google, was dominated by Yahoo so Google never had the first mover advantage. Downstream competitive advantage: Innovation and Expansion of its traditional Web Internet services. Brin & Page saw this unmet need for a quicker and better search engine and developed an all-together new algorithm for Google, providing benefit of relevant, to the point, and quick search. 1998: PageRankTM Algorithm favored pages that were referred by other pages and was determined by counting its inbound link. Till now the only source of revenue was licensing search technology to other search engines, no advertising revenues. Dec 1999: Paid Listing, cost per impression basis, i.e. they changed advertisers each time user views thread irrespective of clicking on the link. Mid 2001: Without spending on Marketing, Google became the 9th largest website in US. 2002: Google adopted a variant of cost per click (CPC) model. They weighted CPC by actual click through rate (CTR) to its expected CTR, i.e. Ads with higher CTR received more prominent position and vice-versa. This maximized their revenue. Google launches Froogle, a product search that identifies merchants for specific products along with prices. Merchants paid neither for their products to appear nor for referral fees when user clicked. May 2002: AOL switches fully to Google Algorithm and paid listing. March 2003: Launches contextual paid listing called AdSense...

Words: 493 - Pages: 2

Google Case

...INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STRATEGY IN ACTION Google On july 19, 2005, Google announced the opening of a product research and development center in China, to be led by renowned computer scientist and industry pioneer Dr. Kai-Fu Lee. Dr. Lee served as de company´s first president and hoped to exploit China´s thriving economy, excellent universities and multitude of talent to help Google develop new products and expand its international business operations. One of the company´s goals was to revitalize the Google website and offer a search engine catered specifically to the Chinese population. The launch of the new web site and sear engine, Google.cn, enable the company to create a greater presence in the growing Chinese market and offered a customized region-specific tool with features (such as Chinese-language character inputs) that made the chinese user experience much simpler. It also sparked the greatest controversy in the company´s history. In order to gain the Chinese government´s approval and acceptance, it agreed to self-censor and purge any search result of which the government disapproved. Otherwise, the new website risked being blocked in the same way the previous Google. Com was blocked by the Chinese authorities. Google conceded. Type in “Falung gong” or “Tianannmen Square” on Google. Com and thousands of search results will appear; however, when typed into Google.cn all the links will have disappeared. Google will have censored them completely...

Words: 1172 - Pages: 5

Google Case

... be reinvested to gain and maintain competitive advantage. However, Kremic et al. (2006) say that many of the firms today are deciding to outsource setting aside the cost factor to focus on core competencies. Despite the potential risks of outsourcing for example, security issues, cultural problems firms hope to benefit from the lower cost. The importance of outsourcing can be understood by taking into consideration the example of Procter & Gamble (P&G), Pilot study case, when the company outsourced its Java Programming to Manila, Philippines, and Poland and saved about $ 28 million which is a significant amount in terms of cost saving and profit maximization (Corbett, 2004). The overall corporate strategy is to minimise operating costs but it is not necessarily a mean of gaining completive advantage because marginal cost might be higher than it used to be. 92 International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. 4 No. 8 [Special Issue – July 2013] Theoretical Perspective on Outsourcing Trends According to Manning et al. (2008) the next wave of outsourcing will be largely affected by low labour cost and global talent hunt in order to focus on the business core competencies. Companies can focus on core competencies by outsourcing non-core, non-strategic operations to an outside provider. - Transaction -Cost View This view supports the cost factors of outsourcing strategies in the organization. The services or production can only be outsourced......

Words: 11277 - Pages: 46

Case Google

...Please read the case and answer the question: what classical principles of organization theory does Google controvert? what principles are employed? Google’s Innovation Machine In the pantheon of internet-based companies, Google stands out as both particularly successful and particularly innovative. Not since Microsoft has a company had so much success so quickly. Google excels at IT and business architecture, experimentation, improvisation, analytical decision making, participative product development, and other relatively unusual forms of innovation. It balances an admittedly chaotic ideation process with a set of rigorous, data-driven methods for evaluating ideas. The company culture attracts the brightest technical talent, and despite its rapid employee growth Google still gets 100 applicants for every open position. It has developed or acquired a wide variety of new offerings to augment the core search product. Its growth, profitability, and shareholder equity are at unparalleled levels. This highly desirable situation may not last forever, but Google has clearly done something right. Indeed, Google has been the creator or a leading exponent of new approaches to business and management innovation. Much of what the company does is rooted in its legendary IT infrastructure, but technology and strategy at Google are inseparable and mutually permeable—making it hard to say whether technology is the DNA of its strategy or the other way around. Whichever it is, Google...

Words: 2495 - Pages: 10

Google Case

...By August 2013, Google, Inc., known more for its dominance in the area of internet search till then, began to overtake its major rivals in innovation. The firm started working on a lot of other projects and increased its spending on research and development, thus gaining an edge over its competitors (See Exhibit I for revenue, profits and R&D expenses). Some analysts predicted that Google had started outpacing Apple, Inc. (Apple) in design, an area traditionally dominated by Apple. Google achieved this feat by making innovation an everyday process rather than as a necessity during times of crisis. It followed a unique ‘launch and iterate’ process to innovation where the new products developed were initially made available to the public as beta versions. Google improved these new products after getting feedback from the early users. It also practiced the system of using lead users to find new and innovative applications for its products. In addition to this, its CEO and co-founder, Larry Page (Page), continuously pushed the employees to go in for ‘moon shots’, i.e., create products and services that were 10 times better than the competition. According to Page, “How exciting is it to come to work if the best you can do is trounce some other company that does roughly the same thing? That’s why most companies decay slowly over time. They tend to do approximately what they did before, with a few minor changes. It’s natural for people to want to work on things that they know...

Words: 669 - Pages: 3

Google Case

... market segment (Porter, 1980). Based on the case study, author concludes to say Google is using Differentiation generic strategic, Google try to differentiate its search engine style different from other search engines and also how the ad style are been advertise is also different. The use of innovative processes for business is a unique business model. Moreover, based on Google mission which is “to organize the world’s 3 information and make it universally accessible and useful” shows that Google targeted to broad market scope. Google also made its interface simple and easy to use compare to its rivals. Which most of it rivals have recently copied from Google. Google kept on investing on its employees so they can capture the big market or world. Last, analyses Google’s strategy and the type of market disruption it has created using a dynamic environment perspective. Google positions for speed and surprise by constantly innovating by setting limitations on how long it will take to make changes to its products and services. Through its new products and services Google gave, which are AdSense and GoogleApps, etc. And its low cost marketing its shifts the rules of competition by finding new and better ways to serve its customers. Google as an organization never stopped seeking new knowledge through its innovative management strategic and also they ready at all time to invest in risky projects that have a high-return potential. Beside of that, Google...

Words: 1151 - Pages: 5