Free Essay

Group and Organizational Dynamics

In: Business and Management

Submitted By OneZuri
Words 2647
Pages 11
Introduction According to Meriam-webster a group is defined as two or more figures forming a complete unit in a composition or a number of individuals assembled together or having some unifying relationship. Group and organizational dynamics are in all areas of our lives. From the corporate jobs, small business owners to family and friends, each area of our lives consist of different groups. Working in groups can be challenging at times. Knowing your strengths as individuals as well as knowing your role in group settings can make the challenges easier. I will discuss group and organizational dynamics from six different areas: group vs. individual decision making; motivational patterns in group dynamics; conflict; competition; task functions; and maintenance function.
Group vs. Individual Decision Making It has been said that two heads is better than one. When it comes to making a decision rather it’s in your personal or professional life many seek the opinions of others before making a final decision. When I worked in 911 call centers there were times when you had to work with a group of dispatchers on task throughout the city and then there were times when I needed to make a quick decision to make sure that officers in the field were safe on my own. I found myself at ease when making the group decisions because I knew that the bulk of what happened wouldn’t be on my shoulders. There was someone else to share responsibilities with me. When working with a group of people communication with all individuals is critical to keep the group on the same level. There are verbal and non verbal ways to communicate with individuals in the group. Depending on your role in the group the way you decide to communicate with others will vary. When working on the survival guide with my two peers I found that we each had a voice about what we would need to survive if left out in the woods. We each had our own ideas at first and started out working as individuals but soon realized that we would need to communicate and team up in order for our ideas to be the same. We interacted verbally with what we needed and what order we would need the items to survive until help came. We each explained what item was more important and why. This was not my first time working in a group however this was the first time a group project went smoothly. I would say partially to the short time we worked together and the type of project assigned
I appreciate the dynamics that working in groups bring however sometimes working alone is easier. Individual decision making at times can be stressful however because you don’t have to weigh others opinions it can be easily accessed. When working alone there is no one to place blame or to celebrate with at the end of an assignment. Most of my career I have worked in some type of group setting except for when I was supervising my own shift. There was time when I would have to make quick decisions to make sure that the dispatch center still ran smoothly even though there were problems with a certain computer or radio. When having to make a split decision I found that working alone was easier because I didn’t have to deal with the person who wasn’t as confident or lack information to get the job done.
Motivational Patterns in Group Dynamics What motivates one individual may be different for another individual. When working with groups it is imperative that the leader of the group is able to decipher what motivates members to put their best foot forward. When speaking with DeAndrae Thompson, president of a social club in Dallas, she explained that working with a group of women on projects can be very challenging. She stated that what she learned to do is to figure out what motivates the women and to challenge them to achieve certain goals. She pushes the women to find charities that are of their area of interest so that when it comes time to work they take it to heart. I have learned while working with others that rewards and punishments are expected. One has to know what the standard is and once it is achieved what is available to keep them motivated. Job security, wages, promotions, monetary gifts are all things that will keep an individual motivated. However there has to be some type of standard required. When the leader of the team notices that the moral of the group is changing then one must become creative and rethink what will motivate the group to do more to complete assignments in a prompt time with few errors When thinking of motivation in group dynamics Douglas McGregor theories comes to mind how management could use a set of needs to motivate employees. There are two theories that McGregor developed his work from based on Maslow’s Hierarchy of needs. Theory X the mangers role was to coerce and control employees. With Theory Y the managers would develop the potential in employees and help them to release that potential towards common goals. Now to motivate and keep a group on one accord I believe that Theory Y would work best today. Employees and members of any group want to feel like they are apart and not boss around all the time. Theory Y doesn’t make one feel like they are being micromanaged. Fredrick Herzberg two factor motivation hygiene theory states that there are certain factors in the workplace that cause job satisfaction, while a separate set of factors cause dissatisfaction. The following table presents the top seven factors causing dissatisfaction and the top six factors causing satisfaction, listed in the order of higher to lower importance.
Leading to satisfaction
• Achievement
• Recognition
• Work itself
• Responsibility
• Advancement
• Growth Leading to dissatisfaction
• Company policy
• Supervision
• Relationship with boss
• Work conditions
• Salary
• Relationship with peers
• Security

Herzberg reasoned that because the factors causing satisfaction are different from those causing dissatisfaction, the two feelings cannot simply be treated as opposites of one another. The opposite of satisfaction is not dissatisfaction, but rather, no satisfaction. Similarly, the opposite of dissatisfaction is no dissatisfaction.
Conflict
Group conflict is bound to happen at someone point. As we discussed in class if there is no conflict there is a possibility that someone is not agreeing with the other people in the group and is too afraid to speak up. In article, Managing Organizational Conflict, author that’s that when we accept that unanimity does not exist in complex organizations, we acknowledge that friction is part of the administrator’s job. So conflict though it has been viewed upon as being negative, can actually be positive. Conflict when handled appropriately allows members of the group who feel differently about a task or the way something is being done to speak on it. Conflict doesn’t always mean that everyone is fighting, is simply means that all parties in the team don’t accept what is currently going on. Group conflict can actually lead to positive results at times. The person that brings up the idea or whose opinion is differently can cause a shift in the way a project is being handled. The sole purpose of conflict is so that someone can re-evaluate the way something is being handled. I recall when we first started our course at Texas College as Group 52. There was one member of our group that seemed to play devil’s advocate every class session. It became unbearable for another student and I. It seemed like week after week he would find something to complain about or something to do to agitate the professor and prolong progression in the course. During one class we both stated how we felt about him and his attitude. It was an awkward moment but it felt good to get it off our chest. We didn’t want to carry on this same behavior for another year through other courses. He has since become more attentive and even easier to get along with. Not sure if the conflict or just a change is course caused it to happen but it is good to see the change.
Competition
Competition in groups can be used as a form of motivation. When competing with someone else most people will try to put their best foot forward; and major players like to say they won. Robbins believes that competition and conflict go hand and hand. However that is no always the case. Competition could be to complete a task as a cohesive unit with the minimum amount of mistakes. In most of my working environments I would find myself competing with others to shine for my manager. I wanted to make sure when records were pulled or numbers were counted it would be said that I did the best. I always wanted to compete so that my mangers would see the value in me and want to elevate me up in the work place. Competition is a friendly way to keep moral and motivate groups or employee. Celebrity Apprentice is a prime example how healthy competition can be rewarding. It is amazing to see how a group can work together for a common goal. Though they are not always on one accord when it comes to conflict the groups seem to pull it together enough to focus on the competition and win. I also find that competition within the group is unique when it comes to the board room. Each celebrity tries to show they are more worthy of staying even when they don’t always make the best decision or best fit to stay on the show. So far it has worked out well for celebrities like LaToya Jackson and Gary Buesy whom myself would love to vote off the show. When it comes to competing LaToya contributes bare minimum on just about every task and Gary is all over the place. In the upcoming weeks I am sure it will get interesting on who will be crowned The Celebrity Apprentice.
Task Functions Working with a group of people can be challenging and rewarding at times. Each person in the group plays a group task role. The functionality of the group sometimes can depend on the task role that members decide to play. Sometimes members have more than one role to play in an assignment, other times they my stick to just one task function. The task functions are: initiator-contributor, information-seeker, opinion-seeker, information-giver, opinion-giver, elaborator, coordinator, orienter, evaluator-critic, energizer, procedural technician and recorder. When I first started out at Suddenlink communications my main task was to be the information give to the customers that called in. I was a customer service representative and spent majority of my day talking to customers about their bills. I would offer them new products as well as inform them on ways to save. I worked on a team of roughly ten people and each of us had different years of experience in customer service as well as with the cable company. As a information giver I offered facts to the customers. When our team would have meeting I found myself being more of the opinion giver. I would state how I felt about new policies and procedures. I would also give my opinion on how I felt things could run smoother. As I have been promoted the department I am currently in doesn’t really have a group. We are a small unit and tasks are split up so very seldom do I have to work with anyone. So I consider my group task role now as the initiator-contributor as well as the recorder. I have to be a self starter and initiate, review and complete all assignments that are given to me. There is no shared responsibility. What I enjoy about this is that I can work at a pace that is suitable for me and not feel the pressure of having to be competitive with others. When we did the Survival assignment in class I was the recorder and well as the information seeker. I wanted to know why we would choice the items in this order and how we could benefit the most. As the information seeker I was always looking for clarification on why the decision as being made. When working in a group I think that having an information seeker is imperative to give the group a rational way of thinking.
Maintenance Function The role of maintenance function is focused more on the functioning of the group as a group not as individuals. The maintenance function is designed more for the way the group is working together. There are seven types of characteristics for the maintenance function which are: encourager, harmonizer, compromiser, gate-keeper and expediter, standard-setter or ego ideal, group observer and commentator and follower. When working in group these roles could change during the task. Watching Celebrity Apprentice I noticed how Star Jones went from being a harmonizer to compromiser when they were working on the task of art. She seemed to want to do the one job of working with the print outs and making sure that the finance side of things was handled however when it came to getting her hand dirty she was so swift and had hesitation. NeNe Leakes was the encourager and told her Star that she could do it. NeNe sarcastically even told her how to remove the paint. When working in a group to maintain it is great to have a harmonizer to relieve tension in conflicting situations. As well as a gate keeper to keep the channels of communication open. I found myself in teams that I have been on for projects at work that I like to set the standard. I want to think outside the box and will pick up extra task to make it happen. Followers in the group seem to be quieter and will agree with everything that the more dominate group members say. In our class discussion on men and women I feel that a lot of times when women are told to be submissive that they feel the need to be the follower. However, to me being submissive doesn’t always mean that you have to go along with everything as followers do. Women still should have some type of standard set so that they want feel devalued. Just because the man is head doesn’t mean that the woman has to loss herself or her voice.
Conclusion
A group rather big or small should have complementary skills and be committed to the same end result. There is a possibility for conflict in a group. To keep groups performing it is imperative to motivate them and have goals set. In my paper I discussed group and organizational dynamics from six different areas: group vs. individual decision making; motivational patterns in group dynamics; conflict; competition; task functions; and maintenance function. All these areas discussed in a broad overview. I enjoy working in groups as well as alone. In studying group dynamics I was able to see what roles of a team that I play and how to put a group together to get more from them.

References
Group. (2011). Retrieved from MERRIAM-WEBSTER ONLINE (www.Merriam- Webster.com).
Pierce, Jon L. Newstrom. (2002). The Manager’s Bookshelf Sixth Edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Robbins, Stephen P. (unknown). Managing Organizational Conflict. (Module).
Robbins, Stephen P. (unknown). A Point of Departure. (Module).
Thompson, DeAndrae, President of Social Club The Giddy Up Girls (Personal Communication, April 13, 2011).
Tubbs, Stewart L. (2004). A Systems Approach to Small Group Interaction Eight Edition. New York. The McGraw-Hill Companies.
Two-Factory Theory. (n.d.). Retrieved from the OPLC WIKI: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two- factor_theory.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Organizational Group Dynamics

...“India is a Nation of Unfulfilled greatness. Its potential has lain fallow, underused. ” -Late Lee Kuan Yew, Former prime minister, Singapore Manufacturing in India is one of the most classical cases of high potential-low on performance type of industry. 68 years and beyond India still is trying to find the right foot for its manufacturing sector. Back in 1950s, India had a great platform and could have set stage for a prosperous future. But it was marred by political instability, vicious fights for power, cultural prejudice, caste discrimination, lack of entrepreneurial vision and above all sheer will to understand the cost of success. The Indian concept of ‘jugaad’ is good but is it this what is required for the success of manufacturing industry? The story till date: Not a happy start Today manufacturing in India accounts for approximately 15 % of the GDP. In 1993 the manufacturing sector was also around 15% of RESTRUCTURING INDIA’s GDP DISTRIBUTION Saurabh Kumar Singh IMT-Ghaziabad GDP. With almost negligible percentage of growth, countries like China or even Malaysia, Indonesia and Philippines have shown significant improvement in the last decade. Since independence of India, the vision of the government never included good reforms for manufacturing industries. When it was the time for the Indian SMEs to understand that export was the key to ensuring their prosperous future, India was beleaguered by emergency and license Raj. China during this time was gathering forces...

Words: 1287 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Organizational Behaviour

...Organizational Behaviour (BAM – 317) Assignment Topic: * Group Dynamics with example. * Current trends in the field of organizational behaviour. Submitted to - Mr P. S. Lakhawat Submission date -: 18th March’2015 Submitted by -: Himanshu Sharan P.Id -: 12BTCSE052 Stream -: B.Tech CSE 6th Sem. * Group Dynamics with example Kurt Lewin a social psychologist and change management expert, is credited with coining the term "group dynamics" in the early 1940s. He noted that people often take on distinct roles and behaviours when they work in a group. "Group dynamics" describes the effects of these roles and behaviours on other group members, and on the group as a whole. The phrase "Group Dynamics" contains two words -: I. Group- a social unit of two or more individuals who have in common a set of beliefs and values, follow the same norms and work for an establishable common aim. The members of the group share a set of common purpose, tasks or goals. II.  Dynamics- the flow of, coherent activities which as envisaged, will lead the group towards the establishment of its set goals. Group dynamics deals with the attitudes and behavioural patterns of a group. Group dynamics concern how groups...

Words: 3913 - Pages: 16

Premium Essay

Effect of Fdi on Indian Insurance Sector

...Culture represents the beliefs, ideologies, policies, practices of an organization. It gives the employees a sense of direction and also controls the way they behave with each other. The work culture brings all the employees on a common platform and unites them at the workplace. There are several factors which affect the organization culture: * The first and the foremost factor affecting culture is the individual working with the organization. The employees in their own way contribute to the culture of the workplace. The attitudes, mentalities, interests, perception and even the thought process of the employees affect the organization culture. Example - Organizations which hire individuals from army or defence background tend to follow a strict culture where all the employees abide by the set guidelines and policies. The employees are hardly late to work. It is the mindset of the employees which forms the culture of the place. Organizations with majority of youngsters encourage healthy competition at the workplace and employees are always on the toes to perform better than the fellow workers. * The sex of the employee also affects the organization culture. Organizations where male employees dominate the female counterparts follow a culture where late sitting is a normal feature. The male employees are more aggressive than the females who instead would be caring and softhearted. * The nature of the business also affects the culture of the organization. Stock broking...

Words: 2763 - Pages: 12

Free Essay

Group and Team Formulations

...Group and Team Formulations B. Nelson Management May 17, 2011 Marian G. Group and Team Formulations Modern day organizations collectively formulate a team approach to work actively in accomplishing a common task or objective in meeting a goal in which each individual is held accountable. Organizations look to uncover the lapse in group and team approaches and to facilitate a reaction in managing organizational goals in which the workforce restructures its self to maximize the gravity of assignments moving forward. In attaining this goal, organizations delve into developing a more collaborative and autonomous atmosphere in realizing success in his or her approach. In this paper the subject to explain is the differences between group and team formulations while examining the importance of workplace diversity in organizations and the role team dynamics possess in the workplace. Group Formulations A group is a collection of two or more people who work with one another regularly to achieve common goals...

Words: 1231 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Management

...Solving the Dilemma A Leader’s Guide to Managing Diversity Increasing workforce diversity has become an inevitable fact of organizational life, but it is still unclear whether this increasing diversity has a positive or negative effect on organizational performance. Leaders seeking to manage diversity effectively should consider research findings that suggest that when the tasks to be performed are complex, diverse workgroups produce more creative and innovative solutions and achieve better results than workgroups that are more homogeneous; for less complicated tasks, however, the complex dynamics of a highly diverse workgroup can actually hinder the work process and lower performance. T he first and foremost task of leaders is to successfully implement organizational strategies. In today’s business environment, one of the critical elements of achieving this goal is effectively managing an increasingly diverse workforce—teams of people of different races, cultures, religions, languages, and so on. Corporate strategists are increasingly viewing workforce diversity as something that can drive organizational value by sparking innovation and increasing competitiveness in an ever more global marketplace. Often overby David L. Dinwoodie looked, however, are the leadership challenges inherent in managing people who have vastly different backgrounds, traditions, motivations, and concerns. In facing these challenges, it is essential for leaders to consider that individuals draw...

Words: 2489 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Research

... | | |College of Social Sciences | | |PSYCH/570 Version 2 | | |Organizational Psychology | | |Dr. Kathleen Hughes De Sousa | Copyright © 2010, 2009, 2008 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved. Course Description This course is an in-depth look at organizational psychology and therefore covers the organizational side of the field, including the impact of the organizations on the individual and on groups of individuals. The dynamics and cultural characteristics of organizations are identified and described in-depth, and organizational development and change are given particular emphasis as well. Policies Faculty and students/learners will be held responsible for understanding and adhering to all policies contained within the following two documents: • University policies: You must be logged into the student website to view this document. • Instructor policies: This document is posted in the Course Materials forum. University policies...

Words: 1534 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Group Dynamics

...Group Dynamics Most people within the organizations belong to some formal work group that establishes temporary or permanent groups to accomplish tasks and achievements. These groups consist of different people within the organization who work together to accomplish objectives of the company (Jex & Britt, 2008). It is important that there is an examination of the behavior of the groups so that a complete understanding of the behavior is obtained. There are many types of groups that people become a part of in their everyday life including family, community, church, and within their profession. Memberships to these groups are important because it plays an important role in their behaviors and attitudes. This paper will identify an organizational group of which I have been a part of and will give analysis of the group dynamics of my chosen group. As a part of the analysis the group will be described including the purpose, goals, and demographic nature such as gender, education, and so forth. The stages are development experienced by the group is described and the structure and effect of the structure on the effectiveness of the group is written to help readers understand the importance of the group. Explanation of the dynamics of group behavior within the group and analysis of the effect that group has on me concerning group polarization, conformity, and groupthink concepts. Counseling Department for Georgia Department of Corrections There are many reasons to why a...

Words: 2032 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Organizational Behavior

...Organizational Behavior and Group Dynamics Leon Hildreth MGT 307 Timothy Thacker April 27,2011 This article will discuss the terminology in organizational behavior, diversity, communication, and organizational culture. These terminologies will be defined and this article will show how these terminologies are used in group dynamics. This article will explain how group dynamics and organizational behavior work together in the business world. Organizational behavior is the scientific practice used by companies to study the behavior of individuals within the organization. The academic study of organizational behavior is devoted to the understanding of individuals, groups, and their collective behavior and interaction with one another. The goal of studying behavior is to improve performance of the company, as well those whom they employ. Organizational behavior also deals with researching individual mindsets and viewpoints, dynamics of departments and groups, and the interconnection of employees and managers (Robbins, S. & Judge, T. 2009). When looking at diversity in the work place one will notice that there are many different employees working together to make the company run properly and of those different employees you have different races, genders, religions, ethics, thoughts and values that can play a part in changing the way a company works. Everyone has different personalities and values that need to be considered when working as a team in a company....

Words: 622 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Worplace Diversity and Team Dynamics

...Workplace Diversity and Team Dynamics Mary Martin University of Phoenix MGT307-Organizational Behavior and Group Dynamics Joey Martin, MBA April 25, 2011 Workplace Diversity and Team Dynamics Teamwork is the mantra of the business world for the new millennium. Organizations are realizing that collective problem-solving, in a team setting, enhances creative and critical thinking skills, thus elevating productivity. This paper will explore the characteristics of and differences between groups and teams. Additionally, workplace diversity relevance to team dynamics will be explored in an effort to better understand this phenomenon called teamwork. Groups Groups consist of two or more individuals who come together to achieve particular objectives. Work groups share information and make decisions that help members perform within each individual's area of responsibility. The group focuses on improving individual results. Work groups do not work together to achieve a communal goal, the result being that no positive synergy exists among members. Each member’s performance is the entirety of his or her contribution (Robbins & Judge, 2009). Teams Teams consist of a small grouping of people with complementary skills, working together to achieve a common purpose for which they hold themselves collectively accountable (Schermerhorn, Hunt, & Osborn, 2009). Work team goals are focused on the collective performance of the members’, the result of which is mutual...

Words: 1062 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Groups and Team

...Groups and Teams Your Name MGT307 Date Instructor Groups and Teams The terms group and team are often used interchangeably, although the two terms represent distinctly different functions. Both groups and teams are used in many organizations to achieve organizational goals and further production. Workplace diversity is an important aspect of an organization, and helps to promote effective team dynamics. Groups and team can work together to achieve organizational success. Groups and teams are similar yet very different from each other. Within an organization groups are often referred to as departments. Examples of departmental groups can include accounting departments, graphic design departments, installation departments, and project management departments. Groups consists of several employees who interact primarily to share best practices, information, perspectives, and make decisions to help each group member perform individual tasks (Executive Evolution, 2004). Groups are focused on accomplishing a particular task or goal such as the accounting department being responsible for an organization´s accounts payable and accounts receivable functions. Group members report to a specific leader, often known as a manager or supervisor, of the department or group. The group leader assigns individual tasks to members of the group, holding each group member responsible for specific functions. Accountability within a group is not shared as in a team environment; instead each individual...

Words: 879 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Poitive Organization Scholorship

...Assignment Topic: “How Positive Organization Scholarship developed into an emerging organizational science? How did positive psychology contributed to development of POS? Positive Organizational Scholarship (POS): Positive Organizational Scholarship (POS)has a focal point related to generative dynamics in organizations that eventually lead to human strength and virtue, patience threshold and healing power, vitality and striving, ability-development and producingmore than just ordinary individuals, groups and organizations. POS is based on the argument that enabling human excellence in companiesunleashes somewhat unapparent potential residing inside people and systems; that fosters organizational welfare. POS does not adopt one particular theory or rationale rather draws from a wide array of organizational theories. The term “POS”is composed of: * Positive:This is due to the fact that it emphasizesescalating, confirmatory, and generative states and dynamics; * Organizational:This is because it puts that into organizational perspective. * Scholarship:this is because it asserts theoretically-informed accounts, having strong backing of data and its statistical analysis, that ultimately provide implications for functioning, execution and operations of organizations. When practically applied to career development, POS reveals new horizons of thinking about antecedents and results of career development and provides new research questions for the researchers. ...

Words: 2257 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Organization Behavior

...Organizational Behavior CJA/510 Tracy Webb, J.D. August 15, 2011 This paper will discuss the meaning of Organizational Behavior and understanding human behavior. I will discuss Organizational Behavior within the Criminal Justice Agency and the important elements of Organizational Behavior and how these elements can challenge the effectiveness of an agency. Organizational Behavior is the study of individual behavior and group dynamics in organizations. An article that I read stated that Organizational Behavior is an application of knowledge about how people, individuals, and groups act in organization. Whatever career and individual choose, the behavior of the human beings tends to shape the behavior of others. The primary concern of organizational behavior is psychosocial, interpersonal, and behavioral dynamics in organizations. The variables that affect human behavior at work are relevant to the study of organizational behavior. These organizational variables include jobs, communication, performance, design, organizational design and structure. The variables are very important in individuals’ behavior and group dynamics. Organizational Behavior encompasses mass professions, companies and organizations, with the goal of increasing productivity, attaining goals, promoting employee development and learning, motivating employee and providing customer service to external and internal stakeholders. The company that I worked for mission was to keep an open line of communication...

Words: 866 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Abd12532

...impact of individuals, groups, and structure on behavior within organizations; the aim is to apply such knowledge toward improving organizational effectiveness. The purpose of organizational behavior is to gain a greater understanding of those factors that influence individual and group dynamics in an organizational setting so that individuals and the groups and organizations to which they belong may become more efficient and effective. The field also includes the analysis of organizational factors that may have an influence upon individual and group behavior. Much of organizational behavior research is ultimately aimed at providing human resource management professionals with the information and tools they need to select, train, and retain employees in a fashion that yields maximum benefit for the individual employee as well as for the organization. The are following three levels of analysis in Organizational Behavior are individual, group, and organizational. Individual Level of Analysis: At the individual level of analysis, organizational behavior involves the study of learning, perception, creativity, motivation, personality, turnover, task performance, cooperative behavior, deviant behavior, ethics, and cognition. At this level of analysis, organizational behavior draws heavily upon psychology, engineering, and medicine. Group Level of Analysis At the group level of analysis, organizational behavior involves the study of group dynamics, intra- and intergroup...

Words: 407 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Behavioral

... Organizationa Behavior: Organizational behavior is a misnomer. It is not the study of how organizations behave, but rather the study of individual behavior in an organizational setting. This includes the study of how individuals behave alone, as well as how individuals behave in groups. The purpose of organizational behavior is to gain a greater understanding of those factors that influence individual and group dynamics in an organizational setting so that individuals and the groups and organizations to which they belong may become more efficient and effective. The field also includes the analysis of organizational factors that may have an influence upon individual and group behavior. Much of organizational behavior research is ultimately aimed at providing human resource management professionals with the information and tools they need to select, train, and retain employees in a fashion that yields maximum benefit for the individual employee as well as for the organization. Organizational behavior is a relatively new, interdisciplinary field of study. Although it draws most heavily from the psychological and sociological sciences, it also looks to other scientific fields of study for insights. One of the main reasons for this interdisciplinary approach is because the field of organizational behavior involves multiple levels of analysis, which are necessary to understand behavior within organizations...

Words: 388 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Assignment 1

...BUS 520 March 4, 2014 #1 – Provide a brief one paragraph background of the CEO of Zappos.com, Tony Hsieh. Zappos.com is an online apparel store that was established in the late nineties in Las Vegas, Nevada. Specifically, they sell purses, clothes, jewelry and eyewear. The name, Zappos, comes from the word zapatos, which means shoes in Spanish. Since its inception and through its acquirement by Amazon.com in 2009, Zappos has become the world-leader in on-line shoe sales. (Crunchbase) The company’s Chief Executive Officer is Tony Hsieh. The son of Taiwanese immigrants, Hsieh was born in Illinois, raised in California and graduated from Harvard University with a bachelor’s degree in Computer Science in 1995. Dissatisfied working in corporate America for software giant, Oracle, Hsieh left his employment after only several months. He started his own business, an internet advertising company, and became a venture capitalist. In 1998, at the age of 24, Hsieh sold that internet start-up company, LinkExchange, instantly making him a millionaire. He then invested heavily in Zappos. In addition to investing in Zappos, he also worked for the company as a consultant. (businessider) By the year 2000, Hsieh was CEO of the Zappos and maintains that position today. #2) Analyze the CEO’s leadership style and philosophy and how the CEO’s leadership style aligns with the culture. Tony Hsieh has a casual leadership style. He left Oracle because he was not happy or comfortable with...

Words: 1662 - Pages: 7